Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1987 Aug;389:491–512. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016668

Activation patterns of embryonic chick lumbosacral motoneurones following large spinal cord reversals.

M W Vogel 1
PMCID: PMC1192092  PMID: 3681734

Abstract

1. Embryonic chick motoneurones were caused to innervate inappropriate hindlimb muscles by rotating the presumptive lumbosacral region of the neural tube in stage 15-16 embryos which is prior to the outgrowth of motoneurone axons. 2. The activation patterns of motoneurones in control and spinal cord reversal embryos were analysed from electromyographic (e.m.g.) recordings of stage 36 limb muscles during evoked movement sequences in an isolated spinal cord-limb preparation. Histograms representing the frequency of activation were constructed for each muscle. The muscle's pattern of activation was classified as flexor-like or extensor-like and compared to the activation patterns of control muscles. 3. A series of control operations was performed in which the prospective lumbosacral region of the neural tube was removed and replaced in its original orientation. Muscles in these embryos were innervated by their normal motoneurone pools and they were activated normally, indicating that the neural tube operation per se does not alter the activation pattern of motoneurones. Furthermore, some muscles (twelve out of sixty-one) in spinal cord reversal embryos had normal activation patterns and appeared to be innervated by their original motoneurones. Based on these results and the result of a previous study (Landmesser & O'Donovan, 1984 b), it is concluded that motoneurones in reversed spinal cords are activated in a manner appropriate for their original identity. 4. The majority of muscles (thirty-three out of sixty-one) in large spinal cord reversal embryos were activated during an appropriate phase of the kicking cycle. Of the remaining muscles, 16% were activated inappropriately (i.e. extensor muscles were activated as flexors, and vice versa), and 30% had a novel 'mixed' flexor- and extensor-like activation pattern. However, the activation pattern of most muscles differed markedly from that of any other control muscles regardless of whether the muscle was activated appropriately or inappropriately as a flexor or extensor. The abnormal activation patterns are a likely consequence of the diffuse distribution of inappropriate motoneurones projecting to foreign muscles in embryos with large spinal cord reversals. Since it is likely that motoneurones are still activated according to their original identity, the activation patterns of individual foreign motor units projecting to a muscle sum in e.m.g. recordings to produce a novel abnormal activation pattern.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
491

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bekoff A. Ontogeny of leg motor output in the chick embryo: a neural analysis. Brain Res. 1976 Apr 23;106(2):271–291. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)91025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bekoff A., Stein P. S., Hamburger V. Coordinated motor output in the hindlimb of the 7-day chick embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Apr;72(4):1245–1248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.4.1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M., MAGNI F. Monosynaptic excitatory action on motoneurones regenerated to antagonistic muscles. J Physiol. 1960 Nov;154:68–88. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M., SHEALY C. N., WILLIS W. D. Experiments utilizing monosynaptic excitatory action on motoneurons for testing hypotheses relating to specificity of neuronal connections. J Neurophysiol. 1962 Jul;25:559–580. doi: 10.1152/jn.1962.25.4.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eide A. L., Jansen J. K., Ribchester R. R. The effect of lesions in the neural crest on the formation of synaptic connexions in the embryonic chick spinal cord. J Physiol. 1982 Mar;324:453–478. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferguson B. A. Development of motor innervation of the chick following dorsal-ventral limb bud rotations. J Neurosci. 1983 Sep;3(9):1760–1772. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-09-01760.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forehand C. J., Purves D. Regional innervation of rabbit ciliary ganglion cells by the terminals of preganglionic axons. J Neurosci. 1984 Jan;4(1):1–12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-01-00001.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frank E., Westerfield M. The formation of appropriate central and peripheral connexions by foreign sensory neurones of the bullfrog. J Physiol. 1982 Mar;324:495–505. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HAMBURGER V., BALABAN M. Observations and experiments on spontaneous rhythmical behavior in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1963 Mar;6:533–545. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hollyday M., Hamburger V., Farris J. M. Localization of motor neuron pools supplying identified muscles in normal and supernumerary legs of chick embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3582–3586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hollyday M., Mendell L. Area specific reflexes from normal and supernumerary hindlimbs of Xenopus laevis. J Comp Neurol. 1975 Jul 15;162(2):205–220. doi: 10.1002/cne.901620204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hollyday M. Rules of motor innervation in chick embryos with supernumerary limbs. J Comp Neurol. 1981 Nov 1;202(3):439–465. doi: 10.1002/cne.902020312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobson R. D., Hollyday M. A behavioral and electromyographic study of walking in the chick. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Jul;48(1):238–256. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.1.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobson R. D., Hollyday M. Electrically evoked walking and fictive locomotion in the chick. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Jul;48(1):257–270. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.1.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson D. A., Purves D. Tonic and reflex synaptic activity recorded in ciliary ganglion cells of anaesthetized rabbits. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:599–613. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lance-Jones C., Landmesser L. Motoneurone projection patterns in the chick hind limb following early partial reversals of the spinal cord. J Physiol. 1980 May;302:581–602. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lance-Jones C., Landmesser L. Pathway selection by embryonic chick motoneurons in an experimentally altered environment. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Dec 9;214(1194):19–52. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Landmesser L. T., O'Donovan M. J. Activation patterns of embryonic chick hind limb muscles recorded in ovo and in an isolated spinal cord preparation. J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:189–204. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Landmesser L. T., O'Donovan M. J. The activation patterns of embryonic chick motoneurones projecting to inappropriate muscles. J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:205–224. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Landmesser L. T. The generation of neuromuscular specificity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1980;3:279–302. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.03.030180.001431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Landmesser L. The distribution of motoneurones supplying chick hind limb muscles. J Physiol. 1978 Nov;284:371–389. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mark R. F. Synaptic repression at neuromuscular junctions. Physiol Rev. 1980 Apr;60(2):355–395. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mendell L. M., Scott J. G. The effect of peripheral nerve cross-union on connections of single Ia fibers to motoneurons. Exp Brain Res. 1975 Mar 27;22(3):221–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00234765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oppenheim R. W. The role of supraspinal input in embryonic motility: a re-examination in the chick. J Comp Neurol. 1975 Mar 1;160(1):37–50. doi: 10.1002/cne.901600104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Purves D., Thompson W. The effects of post-ganglionic axotomy on selective synaptic connexions in the superior cervical ganglion of the guinea-pig. J Physiol. 1979 Dec;297(0):95–110. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Purves D., Wigston D. J. Neural units in the superior cervical ganglion of the guinea-pig. J Physiol. 1983 Jan;334:169–178. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Scott S. A. Maintained function of foreign and appropriate junctions on reinnervated goldfish extraocular muscles. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(1):87–109. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thompson W. J., Sutton L. A., Riley D. A. Fibre type composition of single motor units during synapse elimination in neonatal rat soleus muscle. Nature. 1984 Jun 21;309(5970):709–711. doi: 10.1038/309709a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsukahara N., Fujito Y. Physiological evidence of formation of new synapses from cerebrum in the red nucleus neurons following cross-union of forelimb nerves. Brain Res. 1976 Apr 16;106(1):184–188. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90085-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wigston D. J., Sanes J. R. Selective reinnervation of intercostal muscles transplanted from different segmental levels to a common site. J Neurosci. 1985 May;5(5):1208–1221. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-05-01208.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES