Abstract
Preeclampsia is a syndrome of hypertension in association with target organ dysfunction, including proteinuria, that manifests during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia originates from impaired trophoblastic invasion of the placental resulting in malperfusion and involves multiple mechanistic pathways that include anti-angiogenic factors, endothelial dysfunction, and immune dysregulation. Preeclampsia caries an increased risk for subclinical cardiovascular disease - left ventricular remodeling, diastolic dysfunction, coronary artery calcification, peripheral vascular abnormalities, and microvascular dysfunction – as well as increased risk for clinical cardiovascular disease including stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death from a cardiovascular cause. This review will highlight several common mechanistic pathways shared between preeclampsia and cardiovascular diseases that provide insight into potential targets for risk reduction and disease process mitigation that can be examined in future trials.
Keywords: Preeclampsia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, pregnancy
Subject Terms: Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Hypertension, Women, Sex, Gender
Introduction
Pregnancy serves as a 9-month stress test and, as such, can identify reproductive-age women who may be at heightened risk for cardiovascular disease in later life. Preeclampsia, a hypertensive disorder affecting 5–8% of pregnancies, is a leading contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality, as well as fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth and its incidence is on the rise.1,2 Preeclampsia was long regarded as a temporary obstetrical condition with implications limited to pregnancy. However, we now recognize that women with prior preeclampsia are at elevated risk for the development of not only sustained hypertension but also premature cardiovascular disease (CVD).3–9 Affected women have an increased incidence as early as one year after pregnancy and remain at heightened risk compared with women who did not have preeclampsia.4,9–12
The pathophysiology of preeclampsia includes excessive placental release of anti-angiogenic proteins (sFlt-1, sEng) that lead to systemic manifestations of hypertension, proteinuria, and endothelial dysfunction and may impact long term CVD.13–15 Preeclampsia is also associated with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and abnormal LV systolic and diastolic function both at the time of delivery and later in life.16,17 Meta-analyses have shown that a history of preeclampsia is associated with approximately 4 times increased risk of heart failure and hypertension, 2 times increased risk of coronary artery disease, and more than double the risk of dying from a cardiovascular-related cause.4,18 The majority of the data linking preeclampsia to future CVD comes from epidemiologic studies. Because preeclampsia and CVD share many common risk factors (Figure 2) prospective studies in humans and animal models are greatly needed to better understand the independent contributions of preeclampsia to CVD risk and disease. In this review, we will define subtypes and mechanisms contributing to the development of preeclampsia, describe the structural and functional cardiac changes after preeclampsia, and potential mechanisms contributing to CVD in affected individuals.
Figure 2.

Preeclampsia and cardiovascular diseases share many common risk factors and a growing body of evidence suggests a direct causal pathway between preeclampsia and cardiovascular diseasess
Clinical Manifestations of Preeclampsia and Diagnostic Criteria
Preeclampsia is a complex, multi-organ system disorder of pregnancy characterized by the development of hypertension and proteinuria after the 20th week of gestation. Preeclampsia can also be further categorized as early-onset (before 34 weeks) or late-onset (after 34 weeks). Another important distinction is between mild and severe forms of preeclampsia.
The diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia19 include the presence of:
-
Hypertension: Defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg on two occasions at least four hours apart after 20 weeks of gestation.
AND
Proteinuria: Excretion of ≥ 300 mg of protein per 24 hours, or a protein-to-creatinine ratio ≥ 0.3. In the absence of quantitative studies, 1+ or greater urine dipstick for protein should prompt further evaluation to confirm the diagnosis
In cases of severe preeclampsia, end-organ damage may be part of the initial presentation including any of the following manifestations:
Severe range hypertension: Defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg on two occasions 15 minutes apart
Hepatic dysfunction: defined as elevated liver enzymes (AST, ALT) >2x the upper limit of normal
Neurologic symptoms of severe headache, visual disturbances, or other signs of cerebral edema
Thrombocytopenia
Pulmonary edema
HELLP Syndrome (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets)
More severe forms of preeclampsia correlate with increased risk for peripartum morbidity20 and a more adverse postpartum cardiometabolic profile.21 After pregnancy, severe preeclampsia is associated with a higher likelihood and earlier onset of CVD.4 Recurrent preeclampsia also carries an increased risk of CVD compared with having just one pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia.22
To date, the majority of successful trials aimed at preeclampsia prevention in humans have involved low dose aspirin.23 Aspirin is thought to reduce the risk of preeclampsia through several potential mechanisms, including decreased platelet aggregation, inhibition of prostaglandins and thromboxane, suppression of sFlt-1 expression, and increased proliferation and invasion of trophoblasts improving placental growth. It has also been hypothesized that aspirin slows the metabolic clock of gestation by altering metabolites involved in glycerophosphoid metabolism, polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism and steroid hormone biosynthesis effectively decelerating metabolic gestational age.24 These diverse potential mechanistic pathways targeted by aspirin, as well as histopathologic placental analyses have provided insights into the potential pathophysiology of preeclampsia described herein.
The Syndrome of Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia is associated with placental dysfunction, leading to systemic maternal endothelial injury, via mechanisms of angiogenic imbalance, vasoconstriction, increased vascular permeability and senescence (Figure 3). Preeclampsia is thought to arise from impaired trophoblast invasion and abnormal placental vascular remodeling with failure of spiral artery remodeling and impaired extension of invasion, which results in insufficient placental perfusion. There is also increased upstream myometrial artery tone due to decreased vasodilator sensitivity and thus contribute to increased uteroplacental vascular resistance. This ischemic insult leads to a cascade of pathological events, including the release of anti-angiogenic factors, endothelial dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, and activation of the maternal immune system. The hypertensive component of preeclampsia is thought to be due to increased vascular tone and arteriolar vasoconstriction because of endothelial dysfunction, loss of nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasodilation, and the activation of angiotensin II and endothelin systems. Endothelial dysfunction is also thought to be the main driver of proteinuria, though podocyte injury, increased vascular permeability, and renal vasoconstriction and altered renal hemodynamics also contribute. Key players in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia include:
Placental Syncytiotrophoblasts: Inadequate trophoblast invasion of the uterine spiral arteries leads to shallow placentation and reduced extension, which impairs the blood flow to the placenta.
Anti-Angiogenic Factors: The placental release of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and soluble endoglin (sEng) inhibits the bioavailability of pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF), leading to endothelial dysfunction and hypertension.
Endothelial Dysfunction: A key feature of preeclampsia is endothelial cell injury and increased vascular permeability, which results in proteinuria, edema, and multi-organ dysfunction.
Immune Dysregulation: Abnormal immune responses, including increased inflammation and immune cell infiltration in the placenta, contribute to the pathophysiology.
Figure 3.

Angiogenic imbalance in conjunction with abnormal spiral artery remodeling and invasion results in a proinflammatory state, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, increased senescence contributing to endothelial dysfunction, increased vascular tone and a pro-coagulant syndrome of preeclampsia.
ADH=anti-diuretic hormone, ROS=reactive oxygen species
Animal Models of Preeclampsia
Animal models have been crucial for investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia, although have somewhat limited relevance to humans as no animal model spontaneously develops preeclampsia. A comprehensive review of preeclampsia models has been recently published.25 To summarize, various species have been employed to model aspects of the disease, including dogs, sheep, rhesus monkeys and baboons, with rodent models being the most frequently used. As is the case with many other disease processes, all animal models of preeclampsia have their strengths and weaknesses; for preeclampsia differences in the placental physiology between humans and animals is the greatest weakness, with only non-human primates having a similar haemomonochorial placenta.26–28
Rodent models, have been extensively used to study preeclampsia due to their feasibility in genetic manipulation, their ability to mimic many of the hypertensive and renal features of the disease, rapid reproductive cycles, and their small size which facilitates cost-effective housing. The Reduced Uterine Perfusion Pressure (RUPP) rat model involves clipping the ovarian arteries and abdominal aorta above the uterine arteries to reduce placental perfusion. The RUPP model is also used in sheep which have a large, hemochorial placenta which allows for investigations involving the maternal-fetal interface. This results in a preeclampsia-like phenotype of elevated blood pressure, proteinuria, endothelial dysfunction, cardiac remodeling and fetal growth restriction.29 Another rat model involves exposure to angiotensin II receptor Type 1 autoantibodies; female rats harboring the human angiotensinogen gene [TGR(hAogen)L1623] develop a preeclamptic phenotype with hypertension and albuminuria during pregnancy when mated with male rats bearing the human renin gene.30 Several transgenic mouse models have been developed to study specific molecular pathways implicated in preeclampsia31: (1) sFlt-1 Transgenic Mice: Overexpression of sFlt-1 in pregnant mice leads to hypertension, proteinuria, and vascular dysfunction, similar to human preeclampsia. This model is often used to study the role of anti-angiogenic factors in preeclampsia; (2) Mice with mutations in genes encoding the renin-angiotensin system, as well as COMT-, eNOS- and corin-deficient mice develop hypertension and other features of preeclampsia. Although infrequently used, non-human primates, particularly rhesus macaques and baboons are valuable for preeclampsia research because their placental morphology and immune responses are highly similar to humans and these animal models can provide insights into the immune and inflammatory pathways, as well as the effects on placental and fetal development given their longer gestational period.
Biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis
As previously described, the ischemic placenta releases vasoactive and pro-inflammatory substances that induce oxidative stress and impair vasodilation.15 The placenta also overproduces sFlt-1 and sEng, anti-angiogenic proteins which antagonize vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and TGF-β1 signaling, resulting in damage to small vessels, widespread endothelial dysfunction and the aforementioned systemic manifestations (Figure 2).32–39 sFlt-1 and PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) are increasingly used in combination for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, particularly to help distinguish preeclampsia from other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.40 The sFLT-1/PlGF ratio reflects the balance between anti-angiogenesis which occurs when sFLT-1 binds to and neutralizes VEGF and PlGF, and pro-angiogenesis reflected by PlGF levels. In a healthy pregnancy, PlGF supports placental development and vascularization and its concentration rises as the placenta matures. A high sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (>85–100) is strongly indicative of preeclampsia and a low ratio (<38) has a high negative predictive value and is reassuring that the clinical presentation is less likely to be preeclampsia. The ratio is also useful to determine disease several and serial testing can be used to monitor disease progression.41,42
Cardiac remodeling related to preeclampsia
Preeclampsia is also associated with structural heart disease (Stage B heart failure) characterized by increased LV mass and abnormal diastolic function, the presence of which predisposes to the development of clinical (Stages C and D) heart failure (Figure 4).43,44 Preeclampsia was long considered cured at the time of delivery, but there is now accumulating evidence its effects on the vasculature and myocardium are durable.10,45 To date, studies examining the associations between preeclampsia and these abnormalities have not been able to ascertain whether the observed cardiovascular changes in women with preeclampsia are a direct effect of the anti-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory substances secreted at high levels in preeclampsia, or a result of increased blood pressure (BP) and other shared risk factors. Another limitation of prior research is that it is unknown if women destined to develop preeclampsia have preexistent cardiac abnormalities, because cardiac imaging is rarely performed in asymptomatic young women of childbearing age.
Figure 4.

Preeclampsia is associated with the perfect storm of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction risk factors
Preeclampsia is associated with mechanisms that are also common in the development of heart failure including biomarker changes (inflammatory, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, reactive oxygen species) and structural and functional cardiac changes (endothelial dysfunction, ischemia, myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy). These mechanisms may impact the development of structural and functional heart disease (Stage B heart failure) characterized by increased LV remodeling and abnormal diastolic function, the presence of which predisposes to the development of clinical (Stages C and D) heart failure.
Around the time of delivery, individuals with preeclampsia are more likely to have abnormalities of cardiac structure and function compared with women who are normotensive during pregnancy.46 Individuals with preeclampsia have more abnormal parameters of diastolic function, including an exaggerated reduction in E/A mitral inflow ratio and increased E/e’ ratio, as measured with spectral and tissue Doppler on transthoracic echocardiogram.47 Additionally, individuals with preeclampsia have higher LV mass in late pregnancy.48 Individuals with severe and preterm preeclampsia also have more pronounced changes on echocardiogram around the time of delivery compared with women who have normotensive pregnancies including increased estimated mean right ventricular systolic pressure, lower mean global right ventricular longitudinal strain, increased left atrial size, increased LV wall thickness, abnormal LV cardiac relaxation, and increased estimated LV filling pressures.49,50 In the years after pregnancy, a history of preeclampsia remains associated with abnormal diastolic function and LV remodeling. In the fifth decade of life, averaging 9–16 years after the index pregnancy, preeclampsia history was associated with higher mean E/e’ ratio, increased LV mass index and increased relative wall thickness compared with those without preeclampsia.17,43,51 Individuals with a history of severe forms of preeclampsia such as those with HELLP syndrome have the highest proportion of LV concentric remodeling 6 months to 4 years after delivery.52 Preterm preeclampsia also identifies a higher risk phenotype of individuals with Stage B heart failure given its association with lower LV global longitudinal strain in the years after delivery52 and in later life.53 While many studies have demonstrated the strong associations of preeclampsia history with Stage B heart failure in the months to years after delivery, in other studies the association is attenuated after accounting for potential confounding variables.54,55
Mechanisms contributing to the development of abnormal cardiac structure and function in individuals with a history of preeclampsia have not been well studied, however likely have overlap with the mechanisms contributing to its pathogenesis. The anti-angiogenic imbalance in preeclampsia has been correlated with cardiac dysfunction in vivo, and preeclampsia is strongly associated with an increased risk of peripartum cardiomyopathy, a form of severe systolic dysfunction.56,57 Small, single center studies around the time of delivery suggest that anti-angiogenic proteins, sFlt1 and sEng, are associated with worse LV global longitudinal strain and increased LV mass index among individuals with preeclampsia.58 Similarly, activin A has correlated with reduced LV strain and increased LV wall thickness at 1 year postpartum59,60 and at 10 years postpartum.61 Antepartum inhibition of activin A may be associated with improved LV function after preeclampsia.62 In animal models, statin therapy and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade during gestation correlated with reduced LV remodeling and improved LV function after preeclampsia suggesting potential ongoing mechanistic contributions of inflammation, NO, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and could serve as targets for future human studies.63,64 Additional studies are needed to clarify if there may be differences in mechanisms of cardiac changes by preeclampsia subtypes as preliminary studies have shown there may be differences in circulating biomarkers with early-onset preeclampsia (<34 weeks).65
Postpartum progression to hypertension and impact on cardiovascular disease risk factors and risk
Individuals without a history of hypertension who experience a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia, exhibit a heightened incidence of chronic hypertension early in the life course. Home BP monitoring programs have shown that ~30% of individuals remain hypertensive at 6 weeks postpartum. Progression to sustained hypertension varies by severity of preeclampsia; 41% of individuals with severe preeclampsia meet criteria for hypertension (sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, or white-coat hypertension) by ambulatory blood pressure monitor at one year postpartum.66 This is supported by data from the P4 study where at 2 years postpartum, 60% of individuals after preeclampsia were classified as above-normal BP and 21% had hypertension (BP≥130/80 mmHg) by 24-hour average ambulatory BP measurement.67 Data from the NuMom2b-Heart Health Study showed that 35–40% of participants with preeclampsia developed hypertension in the 2–7 years following their first pregnancy at a mean age of 27 at index pregnancy.68 The highest risk was experienced by individuals who delivered preterm. These iatrogenic preterm births were likely related to maternal and/or fetal indications resulting from the clinical manifestations of severe preeclampsia. This is supported by data from Thailand showing 32% of individuals with prior preeclampsia developing hypertension with 7 years after delivery.69
A number of potential mechanisms have been hypothesized to contribute to the development of hypertension after preeclampsia. Angiogenic factors, specifically higher sFlt1/PlGF ratio, have been associated with immediate postpartum hypertension.70 Another potential mechanism is related to natriuretic peptide signaling with higher NT-proBNP concentration in early pregnancy being associated with a lower risk of hypertension 2 to 7 years after delivery.71 Activin A also has been shown to correlate with BP, 1–2 years postpartum.59 These may be targetable pathways for preventing progression to chronic hypertension after preeclampsia.62,72
The high rates of chronic hypertension after preeclampsia coupled with the undertreatment of blood pressure in these individuals likely impacts and accelerates CVD.73 Individuals with both a history of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and current hypertension had the highest proportion of LV remodeling (79%) in just the 8 to 10 years after delivery.17 A study including Hispanic/Latina individuals showed that the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and LV structure and function (LV hypertrophy, relative wall thickness, and diastolic dysfunction), were only partially mediated by current hypertension.74 Further, an echocardiographic study in a cohort of primarily Black individuals, suggested that all LV wall thickness changes after preeclampsia were related to hypertension.75 In a meta-analysis, hypertension was shown to significantly increase risk for the development of coronary artery disease after preeclampsia18. Additionally, data from the UK Biobank has shown that hypertension mediates 64% of coronary artery disease development and 49% of heart failure development76. Similarly, established CVD risk factors (chronic hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and changes in body mass index) accounted for 57% of the increased rate for CVD after preeclampsia in the Nurses’ Health Study, with hypertension alone mediating 48% of the association between preeclampsia and CVD.77 There is a strong shared genetic background between the preeclampsia, gestational and chronic hypertension, and polygenic risk scores developed to predict preeclampsia perform less well than those derived to predict elevated BP.78,79 Taken together, these data suggest that hypertension is a major mediator of subclinical abnormalities of cardiac structure and function and overt CVD after preeclampsia. Thus, highlighting the importance of developing interventions to reduce the chance of progression to chronic hypertension, and, in the interim, strategies to improve hypertension awareness, diagnosis and treatment to goal in this at risk population.
Commonalities between preeclampsia and coronary microvascular disease
Although preeclampsia is unique to pregnancy, it shares many pathological features, including endothelial dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, and inflammation, with CVD in general and coronary microvascular disease in particular.12,80–83 84 Coronary microvascular disease, a form of endothelial dysfunction that manifests as impaired vasodilation of the coronary microcirculation, has been described in up to 30% of women with signs and symptoms of cardiac ischemia who are found to have non-obstructed coronary arteries on invasive angiography.85 Despite having ‘normal’ epicardial coronary arteries, these women have elevated rates of CVD and increased mortality.86,87 The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) and other studies have implicated coronary microvascular disease88 as a causative factor in female-predominant ischemic heart disease pathophysiology.
A limited number of studies have investigated microvascular function after preeclampsia. In a meta-analysis, studies evaluating flow-mediated dilation suggest impaired endothelial function during pregnancy, at the time of preeclampsia diagnosis, and for 3 years postpartum.45 A small, early postpartum study found reduced postpartum coronary flow reserve, a measure of microvascular function, among individuals with severe preeclampsia compared with those without pregnancy complications.89 Mechanistically, postpartum coronary endothelial-dependent dysfunction may be related to angiotensin II receptor type 1 autoantibodies.90 In the year postpartum, individuals with preeclampsia also had evidence of peripheral microvascular dysfunction measured in the cutaneous microcirculation.91 Placental insufficiency and placental vascular lesions related to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have been associated with evidence of endothelial dysfunction 5 to 10 years after delivery.92,93 Later, 8 to 10 years after delivery, individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were found to have reduced coronary flow reserve and higher proportion of microvascular dysfunction compared with individuals without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.94 In this study, results were attenuated after adjustment for diabetes and pre-pregnancy body mass index.
Contributions to vascular disease
Preeclampsia is also highly associated with later life coronary atherosclerotic disease. In a cohort of Swedish women, preeclampsia history was associated with obstructive and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerotic disease by coronary CT angiogram, a median of 29.6 years after delivery95. In this study, preeclampsia history carried an 8% higher prevalence difference for any coronary atherosclerosis. Individuals with preeclampsia history also have evidence of accelerated coronary artery calcification in later life.96,97
In the peripheral vasculature, preeclampsia has been shown to be associated with subclinical peripheral vascular disease of the carotid and femoral arteries.98,99 Overall, these data suggest that earlier onset and more severe subclinical cardiovascular disease is commonly found in individuals with prior preeclampsia. Additionally, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including preeclampsia, have been associated with pulse wave velocity at 1 year after delivery, results that were primarily driven by blood pressure.100
The cerebral vasculature is also impacted by preeclampsia.101 Preeclampsia history is associated with earlier age of stroke.102 Additionally, individuals with prior preeclampsia exhibit worse cognitive function after delivery and are at increased risk for dementia, potentially due to small vessel disease in the brain.103,104 Given the known positive correlations between higher blood pressure and increased rates of cerebrovascular diseases, including stroke, mild cognitive impairment and dementia, clarification as to whether this these associations are independent of the afore mentioned heightened rates of hypertension and other shared risk factors remains to be elucidated. As such, recently updated guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke focus on the importance of hypertension management for risk reduction.105
Accelerated aging after preeclampsia
Individuals with a history of preeclampsia have evidence of accelerated vascular aging. Studies have shown that preeclampsia history puts females on a CVD risk trajectory more similar to males than females of a comparable age.106 This also includes earlier presentation with myocardial infarction overall and amongst the young (age <65 at presentation).107,108 This phenomenon is at least partially mediated through the development of hypertension and a higher burden of other cardiovascular risk factors at a young age.109 Other potential mechanisms driving accelerated aging related to the underlying pathophysiology include increased inflammation and the accumulation of senescent cells, which secrete pro-inflammatory molecules that further perpetuate inflammation and oxidative stress.110
Future research for risk modification
Despite robust evidence of subclinical and overt atherosclerotic, structural, and functional cardio- and cerebrovascular abnormalities after preeclampsia (Figure 1), there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials among postpartum women that investigate ways to mitigate cardiovascular risk. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system may provide an important target for improving vascular and myocardial measures.111 Early postpartum data suggests that angiotensin receptor blockers may improve peripheral vascular endothelial function.91 In addition, treatment with postpartum ACE inhibitor has been associated with improved measures of diastolic function and LV remodeling at 6 months postpartum.112 In a rat model exposed to angiotensin II receptor type 1 autoantibodies, treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker blocked changes in cardiac structure and function.64 Mouse models also suggest that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists could reduce the chance of progression to hypertension.113 Further supportive, pravastatin therapy reversed post-pregnancy LV remodeling63 in rats with the human angiotensinogen gene, suggesting that statins could have a roll in reducing LV remodeling and dysfunction associated with preeclampsia as well.63 Although incorporating preeclampsia in the pooled risk cohort equations did not better risk stratify individuals with a history of preeclampsia,114 preeclampsia is considered a CVD “risk enhancer” and a lower threshold to initiate statin therapy may be warranted in this at-risk population. Whether all individuals with preeclampsia, or only those with severe or early onset preeclampsia can benefit from early initiation of statins for risk modification should be tested in prospective, randomized clinical trials. Importantly, randomized controlled trials conducted in low to middle income countries may have the most benefit as individuals in those countries have some of the highest risk for preeclampsia-related morbidity and mortality.
Figure 1. Acute and Chronic Clinical Manifestations of Preeclampsia.

CIMT=carotid intima-media thickness, CV=cardiovascular, EF=ejection fraction, eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESRD=end stage renal disease, GLS=global longitudinal straing, LV=left ventricular, LVMI=left ventricular mass index
Conclusions
For those who develop preeclampsia, pregnancy thus serves as a window to future cardiovascular health. Preeclampsia is associated with changes in LV myocardial structure, atherosclerotic disease, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes both peripartum and later in life. Shared mechanisms contributing to preeclampsia and CVD may include anti-angiogenic proteins, the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin system, endothelial dysfunction, and immune dysregulation. Further research is needed to investigate interventions in humans that are effective at mitigating cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia.
Sources of Funding:
MEC is supported by AHA CDA 941351. NAB is supported by R01 HL153382.
Footnotes
Disclosures: None.
References
- 1.American College of O, Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in P. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;122:1122–1131. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang S, Cardarelli K, Shim R, Ye J, Booker KL, Rust G. Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients. Maternal and child health journal. 2013;17:1518–1525. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1162-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2002;325:157–160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2007;335:974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, Babu A, Kotronias RA, Rushton C, Zaman A, Fryer AA, Kadam U, Chew-Graham CA, et al. Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller EC, Boehme AK, Chung NT, Wang SS, Lacey JV Jr., Lakshminarayan K, Zhong C, Woo D, Bello NA, Wapner R, et al. Aspirin reduces long-term stroke risk in women with prior hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Neurology. 2019;92:e305–e316. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hauspurg A, Parry S, Mercer BM, Grobman W, Hatfield T, Silver RM, Parker CB, Haas DM, Iams JD, Saade GR, et al. Blood pressure trajectory and category and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:277 e271–277 e278. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Behrens I, Basit S, Melbye M, Lykke JA, Wohlfahrt J, Bundgaard H, Thilaganathan B, Boyd HA. Risk of post-pregnancy hypertension in women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: nationwide cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;358:j3078. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leon LJ, McCarthy FP, Direk K, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Prieto-Merino D, Casas JP, Chappell L. Preeclampsia and Cardiovascular Disease in a Large UK Pregnancy Cohort of Linked Electronic Health Records: A CALIBER Study. Circulation. 2019;140:1050–1060. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Catov JM, Dodge R, Barinas-Mitchell E, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Yamal JM, Piller LB, Ness RB. Prior preterm birth and maternal subclinical cardiovascular disease 4 to 12 years after pregnancy. Journal of women’s health (2002). 2013;22:835–843. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rich-Edwards JW, Fraser A, Lawlor DA, Catov JM. Pregnancy characteristics and women’s future cardiovascular health: an underused opportunity to improve women’s health? Epidemiologic reviews. 2014;36:57–70. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxt006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Berends AL, de Groot CJ, Sijbrands EJ, Sie MP, Benneheij SH, Pal R, Heydanus R, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM, Steegers EA. Shared constitutional risks for maternal vascular-related pregnancy complications and future cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2008;51:1034–1041. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hod T, Cerdeira AS, Karumanchi SA. Molecular Mechanisms of Preeclampsia. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2015;5. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Granger JP, Spradley FT, Bakrania BA. The Endothelin System: A Critical Player in the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia. Current hypertension reports. 2018;20:32. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0828-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aouache R, Biquard L, Vaiman D, Miralles F. Oxidative Stress in Preeclampsia and Placental Diseases. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lane-Cordova AD, Khan SS, Grobman WA, Greenland P, Shah SJ. Long-Term Cardiovascular Risks Associated With Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: JACC Review Topic of the Week. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;73:2106–2116. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Countouris ME, Villanueva FS, Berlacher KL, Cavalcante JL, Parks WT, Catov JM. Association of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy With Left Ventricular Remodeling Later in Life. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;77:1057–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, Babu A, Kotronias RA, Rushton C, Zaman A, Fryer AA, Kadam U, Chew-Graham CA, et al. Preeclampsia and Future Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020;135:e237–e260. doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Malhamé I, Nerenberg K, McLaughlin K, Grandi SM, Daskalopoulou SS, Metcalfe A. Hypertensive Disorders and Cardiovascular Severe Maternal Morbidity in the US, 2015–2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2436478. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Veerbeek JHW, Hermes W, Breimer AY, van Rijn BB, Koenen SV, Mol BW, Franx A, de Groot CJM, Koster MPH. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors After Early-Onset Preeclampsia, Late-Onset Preeclampsia, and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;65:600–606. doi: doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brouwers L, van der Meiden-van Roest AJ, Savelkoul C, Vogelvang TE, Lely AT, Franx A, van Rijn BB. Recurrence of pre-eclampsia and the risk of future hypertension and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bjog. 2018;125:1642–1654. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:287–293.e281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li X, Milosavljevic A, Elsea SH, Wang CC, Scaglia F, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, Poon LC. Effective Aspirin Treatment of Women at Risk for Preeclampsia Delays the Metabolic Clock of Gestation. Hypertension. 2021;78:1398–1410. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gatford KL, Andraweera PH, Roberts CT, Care AS. Animal Models of Preeclampsia: Causes, Consequences, and Interventions. Hypertension. 2020;75:1363–1381. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.14598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Carter AM. Unique Aspects of Human Placentation. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;22. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chau K, Welsh M, Makris A, Hennessy A. Progress in preeclampsia: the contribution of animal models. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2022;36:705–710. doi: 10.1038/s41371-021-00637-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gatford KL, Andraweera PH, Roberts CT, Care AS. Animal Models of Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2020;75:1363–1381. doi: doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bakrania BA, Hall ME, Shahul S, Granger JP. The Reduced Uterine Perfusion Pressure (RUPP) rat model of preeclampsia exhibits impaired systolic function and global longitudinal strain during pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2019;18:169–172. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2019.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang HP, Zhang WH, Wang XF, Zhu J, Zheng YQ, Xia Q, Zhi JM. Exposure to AT1 receptor autoantibodies during pregnancy increases susceptibility of the maternal heart to postpartum ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15:11495–11509. doi: 10.3390/ijms150711495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ishida J, Matsuoka T, Saito-Fujita T, Inaba S, Kunita S, Sugiyama F, Yagami K-i, Fukamizu A. Pregnancy-associated homeostasis and dysregulation: lessons from genetically modified animal models. The Journal of Biochemistry. 2011;150:5–14. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvr069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia: recent insights. Hypertension. 2005;46:1243–1249. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000188408.49896.c5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gilbert JS, Ryan MJ, LaMarca BB, Sedeek M, Murphy SR, Granger JP. Pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia with endothelial dysfunction. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology. 2008;294:H541–550. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01113.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Granger JP, Alexander BT, Llinas MT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA. Pathophysiology of preeclampsia: linking placental ischemia/hypoxia with microvascular dysfunction. Microcirculation (New York, NY : 1994). 2002;9:147–160. doi: 10.1038/sj.mn.7800137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Granger JP, Alexander BT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA. Pathophysiology of pregnancy-induced hypertension. American journal of hypertension. 2001;14:178S–185S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02086-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Noris M, Perico N, Remuzzi G. Mechanisms of disease: Pre-eclampsia. Nature clinical practice Nephrology. 2005;1:98–114; quiz 120. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science. 2005;308:1592–1594. doi: 10.1126/science.1111726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sankaralingam S, Arenas IA, Lalu MM, Davidge ST. Preeclampsia: current understanding of the molecular basis of vascular dysfunction. Expert reviews in molecular medicine. 2006;8:1–20. doi: 10.1017/S1462399406010465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet (London, England). 2005;365:785–799. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17987-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Verlohren S, Brennecke SP, Galindo A, Karumanchi SA, Mirkovic LB, Schlembach D, Stepan H, Vatish M, Zeisler H, Rana S. Clinical interpretation and implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the prediction, diagnosis and management of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;27:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stepan H, Herraiz I, Schlembach D, Verlohren S, Brennecke S, Chantraine F, Klein E, Lapaire O, Llurba E, Ramoni A, et al. Implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for prediction and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia in singleton pregnancy: implications for clinical practice. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:241–246. doi: 10.1002/uog.14799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thadhani R, Lemoine E, Rana S, Costantine MM, Calsavara VF, Boggess K, Wylie BJ, Moore Simas TA, Louis JM, Espinoza J, et al. Circulating Angiogenic Factor Levels in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. NEJM Evid. 2022;1:EVIDoa2200161. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bokslag A, Franssen C, Alma LJ, Kovacevic I, Kesteren FV, Teunissen PW, Kamp O, Ganzevoort W, Hordijk PL, Groot CJM, et al. Early-onset preeclampsia predisposes to preclinical diastolic left ventricular dysfunction in the fifth decade of life: An observational study. PloS one. 2018;13:e0198908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shahul S, Rhee J, Hacker MR, Gulati G, Mitchell JD, Hess P, Mahmood F, Arany Z, Rana S, Talmor D. Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in preeclamptic women with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a 2D speckle-tracking imaging study. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2012;5:734–739. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Milin-Lazovic JS, Garovic VD. Impaired Flow-Mediated Dilation Before, During, and After Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2016;67:415–423. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Castleman JS, Ganapathy R, Taki F, Lip GY, Steeds RP, Kotecha D. Echocardiographic Structure and Function in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2016;9. doi: 10.1161/circimaging.116.004888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rafik Hamad R, Larsson A, Pernow J, Bremme K, Eriksson MJ. Assessment of left ventricular structure and function in preeclampsia by echocardiography and cardiovascular biomarkers. Journal of hypertension. 2009;27:2257–2264. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283300541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Baltabaeva A, Liberati M, Thilaganathan B. Maternal cardiac dysfunction and remodeling in women with preeclampsia at term. Hypertension. 2011;57:85–93. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.162321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Melchiorre K, Sutherland GR, Watt-Coote I, Liberati M, Thilaganathan B. Severe myocardial impairment and chamber dysfunction in preterm preeclampsia. Hypertension in pregnancy. 2012;31:454–471. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2012.697951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vaught AJ, Kovell LC, Szymanski LM, Mayer SA, Seifert SM, Vaidya D, Murphy JD, Argani C, O’Kelly A, York S, et al. Acute Cardiac Effects of Severe Pre-Eclampsia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.AbdelWahab MA, Farrag HM, Saied CE. 24-Hour blood pressure variability as a predictor of short-term echocardiographic changes in normotensive women with past history of preeclampsia/eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;13:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Orabona R, Vizzardi E, Sciatti E, Prefumo F, Bonadei I, Valcamonico A, Metra M, Frusca T. Maternal cardiac function after HELLP syndrome: an echocardiography study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:507–513. doi: 10.1002/uog.17358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Clemmensen TS, Christensen M, Kronborg CJS, Knudsen UB, Logstrup BB. Long-term follow-up of women with early onset pre-eclampsia shows subclinical impairment of the left ventricular function by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;14:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ghossein-Doha C, van Neer J, Wissink B, Breetveld NM, de Windt LJ, van Dijk AP, van der Vlugt MJ, Janssen MC, Heidema WM, Scholten RR, et al. Pre-eclampsia: an important risk factor for asymptomatic heart failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:143–149. doi: 10.1002/uog.17343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Breetveld NM, Ghossein-Doha C, van Neer J, Sengers M, Geerts L, van Kuijk SMJ, van Dijk AP, van der Vlugt MJ, Heidema WM, Brunner-La Rocca HP, et al. Decreased endothelial function and increased subclinical heart failure in women several years after pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:196–204. doi: 10.1002/uog.17534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Patten IS, Rana S, Shahul S, Rowe GC, Jang C, Liu L, Hacker MR, Rhee JS, Mitchell J, Mahmood F, et al. Cardiac angiogenic imbalance leads to peripartum cardiomyopathy. Nature. 2012;485:333–338. doi: 10.1038/nature11040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bello N, Rendon ISH, Arany Z. The relationship between pre-eclampsia and peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;62:1715–1723. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shahul S, Medvedofsky D, Wenger JB, Nizamuddin J, Brown SM, Bajracharya S, Salahuddin S, Thadhani R, Mueller A, Tung A, et al. Circulating Antiangiogenic Factors and Myocardial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2016;67:1273–1280. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.07252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Koczo A, Hauspurg A, Countouris ME, Berlacher KL, Özbay B, Hanley-Yanez K, Catov J. Immune Markers, Blood Pressure Severity, and Cardiac Remodeling 1 to 2 Years After Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e030759. doi: 10.1161/jaha.123.030759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shahul S, Ramadan H, Nizamuddin J, Mueller A, Patel V, Dreixler J, Tung A, Lang RM, Weinert L, Nasim R, et al. Activin A and Late Postpartum Cardiac Dysfunction Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2018;72:188–193. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.10888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.deMartelly VA, Dreixler J, Tung A, Mueller A, Heimberger S, Fazal AA, Naseem H, Lang R, Kruse E, Yamat M, et al. Long-Term Postpartum Cardiac Function and Its Association With Preeclampsia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018526. doi: 10.1161/jaha.120.018526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Naseem H, Dreixler J, Mueller A, Tung A, Dhir R, Chibber R, Fazal A, Granger JP, Bakrania BA, deMartelly V, et al. Antepartum Aspirin Administration Reduces Activin A and Cardiac Global Longitudinal Strain in Preeclamptic Women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015997. doi: 10.1161/jaha.119.015997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kräker K, O’Driscoll JM, Schütte T, Herse F, Patey O, Golic M, Geisberger S, Verlohren S, Birukov A, Heuser A, et al. Statins Reverse Postpartum Cardiovascular Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2020;75:202–210. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang H-P, Zhang W-H, Wang X-F, Zhu J, Zheng Y-Q, Xia Q, Zhi J-M. Exposure to AT1 Receptor Autoantibodies during Pregnancy Increases Susceptibility of the Maternal Heart to Postpartum Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15:11495–11509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lekva T, Sugulle M, Moe K, Redman C, Dechend R, Staff AC. Multiplex Analysis of Circulating Maternal Cardiovascular Biomarkers Comparing Preeclampsia Subtypes. Hypertension. 2020;75:1513–1522. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.14580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Benschop L, Duvekot JJ, Versmissen J, van Broekhoven V, Steegers EAP, Roeters van Lennep JE. Blood Pressure Profile 1 Year After Severe Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2018;71:491–498. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.10338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Henry A, Mangos G, Roberts LM, Brown MA, Pettit F, O’Sullivan AJ, Crowley R, Youssef G, Davis GK. Preeclampsia-Associated Cardiovascular Risk Factors 6 Months and 2 Years After Pregnancy: The P4 Study. Hypertension. 2024;81:851–860. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.123.21890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Haas DM, Parker CB, Marsh DJ, Grobman WA, Ehrenthal DB, Greenland P, Bairey Merz CN, Pemberton VL, Silver RM, Barnes S, et al. Association of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes With Hypertension 2 to 7 Years Postpartum. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e013092. doi: 10.1161/jaha.119.013092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sukmanee J, Rothmanee P, Sriwimol W, Staff A, Liabsuetrakul T. Levels of blood pressure, cardiovascular biomarkers and their correlations in women with previous pre-eclamptic pregnancy within 7 years postpartum: a cross-sectional study in Thailand. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e055534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lopes Perdigao J, Chinthala S, Mueller A, Minhas R, Ramadan H, Nasim R, Naseem H, Young D, Shahul S, Chan SL, et al. Angiogenic Factor Estimation as a Warning Sign of Preeclampsia-Related Peripartum Morbidity Among Hospitalized Patients. Hypertension. 2019;73:868–877. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.12205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hauspurg A, Marsh DJ, McNeil RB, Bairey Merz CN, Greenland P, Straub AC, Rouse CE, Grobman WA, Pemberton VL, Silver RM, et al. Association of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Concentration in Early Pregnancy With Development of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Future Hypertension. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:268–276. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schuermans A, Truong B, Ardissino M, Bhukar R, Slob EAW, Nakao T, Dron JS, Small AM, Cho SMJ, Yu Z, et al. Genetic Associations of Circulating Cardiovascular Proteins With Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9:209–220. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen MT, Vollmer BL, Blyler CA, Cameron NA, Miller EC, Huang Y, Friedman AM, Wright JD, Boehme AK, Bello NA. Antihypertensive medication prescription dispensation among pregnant women in the United States: A cohort study. Am Heart J. 2024;278:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Quesada O, Kulandavelu S, Vladutiu CJ, DeFranco E, Minissian MB, Makarem N, Bello NA, Wong MS, Pabón MA, Chandra AA, et al. Cardiac Abnormalities in Hispanic/Latina Women With Prior De Novo Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2024;81:255–263. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.123.21248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Levine LD, Ky B, Chirinos JA, Koshinksi J, Arany Z, Riis V, Elovitz MA, Koelper N, Lewey J. Prospective Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk 10 Years After a Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;79:2401–2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Aragam K, Klarin D, Bhatt DL, Scott NS, Peloso GM, Natarajan P. Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Hypertension During Pregnancy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;74:2743–2754. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Missmer SA, Mukamal KJ, Rexrode KM, Rich-Edwards JW. Cardiovascular Risk Factors Mediate the Long-Term Maternal Risk Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;79:1901–1913. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nurkkala J, Kauko A, FinnGen, Laivuori H, Saarela T, Tyrmi JS, Vaura F, Cheng S, Bello NA, Aittokallio J, et al. Associations of polygenic risk scores for preeclampsia and blood pressure with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Journal of hypertension. 2023;41:380–387. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nurkkala J, Vaura F, Toivonen J, Niiranen T. Genetics of hypertension-related sex differences and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Blood Press. 2024;33:2408574. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2408574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Smith GN, Walker MC, Liu A, Wen SW, Swansburg M, Ramshaw H, White RR, Roddy M, Hladunewich M, Pre-Eclampsia New Emerging T. A history of preeclampsia identifies women who have underlying cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:58 e51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rodie VA, Freeman DJ, Sattar N, Greer IA. Pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease: metabolic syndrome of pregnancy? Atherosclerosis. 2004;175:189–202. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1685–1695. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000;407:233–241. doi: 10.1038/35025203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Paulus WJ, Tschope C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;62:263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cannon RO 3rd, Epstein SE. “Microvascular angina” as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. The American journal of cardiology. 1988;61:1338–1343. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91180-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sedlak TL, Lee M, Izadnegahdar M, Merz CN, Gao M, Humphries KH. Sex differences in clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2013;166:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Maddox TM, Stanislawski MA, Grunwald GK, Bradley SM, Ho PM, Tsai TT, Patel MR, Sandhu A, Valle J, Magid DJ, et al. Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2014;312:1754–1763. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wong TY, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Duncan BB, Couper DJ, Tielsch JM, Klein BE, Hubbard LD. Retinal arteriolar narrowing and risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. JAMA. 2002;287:1153–1159. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.9.1153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Honigberg MC, Economy KE, Pabón MA, Wang X, Castro C, Brown JM, Divakaran S, Weber BN, Barrett L, Perillo A, et al. Coronary Microvascular Function Following Severe Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2024;81:1272–1284. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.22905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Minhas AS, Vaught AJ, Schär M, Soleimani‐Fard A, Fedarko N, Bennett W, Darla Esteban M, Zakaria S, Coresh J, Hays AG. Association of Coronary Endothelial Function and Angiotensin Receptor Autoantibody With Preeclampsia Among Postpartum Women. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2024;13:e035799. doi: doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Stanhewicz AE, Jandu S, Santhanam L, Alexander LM. Increased Angiotensin II Sensitivity Contributes to Microvascular Dysfunction in Women Who Have Had Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2017;70:382–389. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.09386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kvehaugen AS, Dechend R, Ramstad HB, Troisi R, Fugelseth D, Staff AC. Endothelial Function and Circulating Biomarkers Are Disturbed in Women and Children After Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2011;58:63–69. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.172387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Catov JM, Muldoon MF, Gandley RE, Brands J, Hauspurg A, Hubel CA, Tuft M, Schmella M, Tang G, Parks WT. Maternal Vascular Lesions in the Placenta Predict Vascular Impairments a Decade After Delivery. Hypertension. 2022;79:424–434. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Countouris ME, Catov JM, Zhu J, de Jong N, Brands J, Chen X, Parks WT, Berlacher KL, Gandley RE, Straub AC, et al. Association of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 8 to 10 Years After Delivery. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024;17:e016561. doi: doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Sederholm Lawesson S, Swahn E, Pihlsgård M, Andersson T, Angerås O, Bacsovics Brolin E, Bergdahl E, Blomberg M, Christersson C, Gonçalves I, et al. Association Between History of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Jama. 2023;329:393–404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Benschop L, Brouwers L, Zoet GA, Meun C, Boersma E, Budde RPJ, Fauser B, de Groot CMJ, van der Schouw YT, Maas A, et al. Early Onset of Coronary Artery Calcification in Women With Previous Preeclampsia. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2020;13:e010340. doi: 10.1161/circimaging.119.010340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Zoet GA, Benschop L, Boersma E, Budde RPJ, Fauser BCJM, van der Graaf Y, de Groot CJM, Maas AHEM, Roeters van Lennep JE, Steegers EAP, et al. Prevalence of Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in 45- to 55-Year-Old Women With a History of Preeclampsia. Circulation. 2018;137:877–879. doi: doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Blaauw J, van Pampus MG, Van Doormaal JJ, Fokkema MR, Fidler V, Smit AJ, Aarnoudse JG. Increased intima-media thickness after early-onset preeclampsia. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2006;107:1345–1351. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218097.22464.b4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Akhter T, Wikstrom AK, Larsson M, Naessen T. Individual common carotid artery wall layer dimensions, but not carotid intima-media thickness, indicate increased cardiovascular risk in women with preeclampsia: an investigation using noninvasive high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2013;6:762–768. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Moe K, Sugulle M, Dechend R, Angel K, Staff AC. Functional and structural vascular biomarkers in women 1 year after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020;21:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2020.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wolfova K, Miller EC. Impact of adverse pregnancy outcomes on brain vascular health and cognition. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8:102331. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Miller EC, Kauko A, Tom SE, Laivuori H, Niiranen T, Bello NA. Risk of Midlife Stroke After Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: The FinnGen Study. Stroke. 2023;54:1798–1805. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.123.043052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schliep KC, McLean H, Yan B, Qeadan F, Theilen LH, de Havenon A, Majersik JJ, Østbye T, Sharma S, Varner MW. Association Between Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Dementia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2023;80:257–267. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.122.19399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Eliza C Miller PC, Alirezaei Mohammad, Wolfova Katrin, Gonzales Mitzi M., Tan Zaldy S., Tom Sarah E., Yee Lynn M., Brickman Adam M., Bello Natalie A.. Associations of adverse pregnancy outcomes with cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Healthy Longevity. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Bushnell C, Kernan WN, Sharrief AZ, Chaturvedi S, Cole JW, Cornwell WK 3rd, Cosby-Gaither C, Doyle S, Goldstein LB, Lennon O, et al. 2024 Guideline for the Primary Prevention of Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2024. doi: 10.1161/str.0000000000000475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Langlois AWR, Park AL, Lentz EJM, Ray JG. Preeclampsia Brings the Risk of Premature Cardiovascular Disease in Women Closer to That of Men. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Countouris ME, Koczo A, Reynolds HR, Hausvater A, Mann H, Wang Y, Sharbaugh D, Thoma FW, Mulukutla SR, Catov JM. Characteristics of Premature Myocardial Infarction Among Women With Prior Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. JACC: Advances. 2023;2:100411. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Vaughan Lisa E, Kanaji Y, Suvakov S, Parashuram S, Butler Tobah Yvonne S, Chamberlain Alanna M, Bielinski Suzette J, Milic N, Gulati R, Nath Karl A, et al. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Increase the Risk for Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology.0. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Groenhof TKJ, Zoet GA, Franx A, Gansevoort RT, Bots ML, Groen H, Lely AT. Trajectory of Cardiovascular Risk Factors After Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Hypertension. 2019;73:171–178. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.11726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Suvakov S, Vaughan LE, Parashuram S, Butler Tobah YS, Jayachandran M, Kattah A, Chamberlain AM, Bielinski SJ, Milic N, Garovic VD. Women With a History of Preeclampsia Exhibit Accelerated Aging and Unfavorable Profiles of Senescence Markers. Hypertension. 2024;81:1550–1560. doi: doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Gennari-Moser C, Khankin EV, Schüller S, Escher G, Frey BM, Portmann CB, Baumann MU, Lehmann AD, Surbek D, Karumanchi SA, et al. Regulation of placental growth by aldosterone and cortisol. Endocrinology. 2011;152:263–271. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ormesher L, Higson S, Luckie M, Roberts SA, Glossop H, Trafford A, Cottrell E, Johnstone ED, Myers JE. Postnatal Enalapril to Improve Cardiovascular Function Following Preterm Preeclampsia (PICk-UP):: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Trial. Hypertension. 2020;76:1828–1837. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Biwer LA, Lu Q, Ibarrola J, Stepanian A, Man JJ, Carvajal BV, Camarda ND, Zsengeller Z, Skurnik G, Seely EW, et al. Smooth Muscle Mineralocorticoid Receptor Promotes Hypertension After Preeclampsia. Circ Res. 2023;132:674–689. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.122.321228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Cook NR, Spiegelman D, Missmer SA, Rimm EB, Rexrode KM, Mukamal KJ, Rich-Edwards JW. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk Prediction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72:1252–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
