Skip to main content
Central European Journal of Urology logoLink to Central European Journal of Urology
. 2024 Jun 18;77(3):538–546. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.55.R1

Epidemiological characteristics of 214,063 hospital admissions to adult urological departments in Poland in 2022

Gabriela Moczeniat 1,2,✉, Mateusz Jankowski 3, Paweł Goryński 3, Mariusz Gujski 1
PMCID: PMC11921939  PMID: 40115477

Abstract

Introduction

Nationwide data on urological hospitalizations may improve the quality of care. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of all registered hospital admissions to adult urological departments in Poland in 2022.

Material and methods

This epidemiological retrospective analysis is based on the national registry on hospital admissions managed by the National Institute of Public Health – National Research Institute. All adult patients admitted to urological departments were included in the analysis.

Results

In 2022, 214,063 hospital admissions were recorded in Polish urological departments, 72% of the patients were male. Emergency admissions accounted for 17.6% of these admissions. There were significant differences in hospitalization rate per 100,000 population between the administrative regions (voivodeships), with extreme values recorded in the Opolskie (411.5) and Podkarpackie (987.9) voivodeships. The major causes of admission were genitourinary diseases (ICD-10: N00-N99) at 59% and cancers (ICD-10: C00-C97; D00-D48) at 36%. In general, kidney and ureteral stones (19.9%), bladder cancer (15.2%), and prostate hyperplasia (10%) were the most common causes of hospital admissions. The highest hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants was observed among adults aged 60–69 and 70–79 years. A quarter of hospitalizations were one-day hospitalizations, and the mean duration of hospitalization was 2.93 days for all hospitalizations, and when excluding one-day hospitalizations 3.89 days. Epidemiological characteristics of patients and duration of hospitalization differed by cause of admission.

Conclusions

Findings from this study provide precise epidemiological data on inpatient urological care in Poland. Physicians and policymakers may use this study to evaluate and improve inpatient urological care in Poland.

Keywords: urology, hospitalization, Poland, urological care, nationwide data

INTRODUCTION

Urological diseases are a wide group of urinary tract diseases, pelvic conditions, and genital condi-tions [1–4]. The most prevalent urological diseases are urinary tract infections (UTIs), urolithiasis, bladder control problems, and prostate hyperplasia [1, 2, 4]. Moreover, urologists also treat oncological patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and kidney cancer [3].

Globally, over 150 million cases of community-acquired UTIs are reported annually [2]. Global prev-alence of urolithiasis ranges from 1% up to 13% [1]. Socioeconomic changes and changes in lifestyle habits led to a rise in urolithiasis incidence from 77.78 million incident cases in 1990 to 115.55 million in 2019 (an increase of 48.57%) [1]. Population aging and an increase in expected life expectancy led to an increase in the global prevalence of prostate hyperplasia, from 51.1 million cases in 2000 to 94 million cases in 2019 [4]. A significant rise in the global prevalence of urological cancers is observed globally. Between 1990 and 2019 the global incidence of kidney cancer increased by 155%, bladder cancer by 123%, and prostate cancer by 169% [5]. The growing global burden of urological diseases will lead to increased utilization of urological care [3–5]. Urological diseases are treated both in outpatient and inpatient settings. A significant part of urological care is related to surgical procedures both diagnostics (e.g., biopsy, cystoscopy, ureteroscopy) and treatment (e.g., lithotripsy, cancer resection) [6]. The organization of urological care differs across the countries.

In Poland, as of January 2024, there were 1,461 active urologists and 79 pediatric urologists [7]. Urological care is offered both by public and private institutions and funded under mandatory health insurance (public services within the insurance – National Health Fund) or private healthcare services (paid-for service) [8]. There are both public and private medical facilities offering inpatient urological care. Patients admitted to urological departments within the public funding system require a referral and are admitted according to position on the waiting list [9]. Waiting time differs between the med-ical facilities and departments [10]. A total of 881 urology clinics offered a medical consultation within the mandatory health insurance in January 2024 [10]. There are approximately 120 urological departments in Poland [10]. Urological departments are most often part of multi-profile public hospitals located in larger cities. Urological departments are also managed by private medical facilities, mostly as monoprofile hospitals [8, 11].

Patients with urological diseases are referred to urological departments mainly for diagnosis and treatment using surgical procedures (including minimally invasive surgery) [11, 12]. A significant part of urological hospital care is one day surgery admissions, mostly related to radiological tests (e.g., urography), ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, non-surgical breaking of stones, as well as endoscopic examinations and procedures [13].

Data on patients admitted to urological departments are limited to single-center or multicenter studies, wherein there is a lack of nationwide data on urological inpatient care in Poland [14–16].

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of 214,063 hospital ad-missions to adult urological departments in Poland between January and December 2022.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data source and data collection methods

This epidemiological retrospective analysis is based on the nationwide registry on hospital admission managed by the National Institute of Public Health – National Research Institute [17]. Under the Polish law on nationwide statistics, all public and private hospitals (except the psychiatric units) are obligated to report data on hospitalized patients using a discharge report template. Data from discharge reports are collected and aggregated by the Nationwide General Hospital Morbidity Study Registry scientific board [17]. All medical facilities are trained on reporting procedures by the representatives of the National Institute of Public Health – National Research Institute. Discharge reports include demographic data (gender, age, place of residence), hospital characteristics, admission details (dates of admission, type of admission, cause of admission, hospital wards), comorbidities, and outcome of hospitalization (duration of hospitalization and its course). Data are coded with personal data protection rules and are anonymous. Data on medical conditions are based on the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) [18] and filled out by physicians.

Data were obtained from the National Institute of Public Health – National Research Institute based on the request for public information for scientific purposes.

Hospital admissions to urological departments

Data on all patients admitted to adult urological departments were included in this study. Hospital admissions to urological departments were identified using the medical codes for hospital departments and other hospital care units listed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health on May 17, 2012 [19]. Urological departments were identified using code “4640” as listed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health [19]. Data on patients (a total of 15,996 patients in 2022) who were transferred to the urology department from other departments (the urology department was not the first admission department) were not included in this study.

Causes of hospitalization (primary diagnosis) were defined by physicians in discharge reports using ICD-10 codes [18]. Patients hospitalized due to genitourinary diseases were identified using ICD-10 codes N00-N99. Patients hospitalized due to cancers were identified using ICD-10 codes C00-C97 and D00-D48 [18].

The following ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients with selected diseases: prostate cancer (C61), kidney cancer (C64), bladder cancer (C67), neoplasm of uncertain or unknown behavior of male genital organs (D40), neoplasm of uncertain or unknown behavior of urinary organs (D41), obstructive and reflux uropathy (N13), kidney and ureteral stones (N20), stones of lower urinary tract (N21), unspecified renal colic (N23), urethral stricture (N35), and hyperplasia of prostate (N40) [17].

The type of hospital admission was based on the discharge data and classified into two categories: emergency admission and scheduled admission.

If physicians filled out data on secondary diagnoses and coexisting diseases in discharge reports, patients were classified as those with comorbidities.

The comparable methodology was used in previously published retrospective epidemiological analyses based on the Nationwide General Hospital Morbidity Study Registry [20, 21].

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics v.29 (USA: IBM, Armonk, NY). Epidemiological characteristics of patients admitted to urological departments were presented with descriptive statistics typical for registry-based studies. As the nationwide data were used, hospital admissions per 100,000 adult inhabitants were calculated based on the demographic data from Statistics of Poland (Statistical Yearbooks. Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2022) [22], including data on age, gender, and administrative region of residence. A separate analysis was conducted for the most common causes of admission to urological departments.

Bioethical standards

The Ethical Committee at the Medical University in Warsaw, Poland approved the study protocol, decision AKBE/338/2023 as of December 2023. The study was carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki regulations. Patient consent was waived as anonymous and retrospective data from public statistics (Nationwide General Hospital Morbidity Study Registry) were used.

RESULTS

Number of hospital admissions to urological departments in 2022

In 2022, a total of 214,063 hospital admissions to urological departments (for adults) were reported. Almost three-quarters of patients admitted to urological departments were males (Table 1). Emergency admissions accounted for 17.6% of admissions to urological departments in 2022. Monthly number of hospital admissions varied from 15,338 in January and 15,346 in February to 19,709 in March and 19,668 in May (Table 1).

Table 1.

Number of hospital admissions to urological departments per month, January-December 2022

Month Overall (n = 214,063) Gender Type of hospital admission
Male (n = 155,349) Female (n = 58,714) Emergency (n = 37,669) Scheduled (n = 176,394)
n % n % n % n % n %
January 15,338 7.2 11,172 7.2 4,166 7.1 2,856 7.6 12,482 7.1
February 15,346 7.2 11,330 7.3 4,016 6.8 2,694 7.2 12,652 7.2
March 19,709 9.2 14,353 9.2 5,356 9.1 3,270 8.7 16,439 9.3
April 17,238 8.1 12,551 8.1 4,687 8.0 3,149 8.4 14,089 8.0
May 19,668 9.2 14,233 9.2 5,435 9.3 3,424 9.1 16,244 9.2
June 18,287 8.5 13,283 8.6 5,004 8.5 3,199 8.5 15,088 8.6
July 17,899 8.4 12,936 8.3 4,963 8.5 3,296 8.7 14,603 8.3
August 18,363 8.6 13,377 8.6 4,986 8.5 3,606 9.6 14,757 8.4
September 18,092 8.5 13,070 8.4 5,022 8.6 3,212 8.5 14,880 8.4
October 18,760 8.8 13,595 8.8 5,165 8.8 3,161 8.4 15,599 8.8
November 19,564 9.1 14,014 9.0 5,550 9.5 3,178 8.4 16,386 9.3
December 15,799 7.4 11,435 7.4 4,364 7.4 2,624 7.0 13,175 7.5

In 2022, there were 692.4 hospital admissions per 100,000 adult inhabitants in Poland. There were markable differences in the hospital admissions per 100,000 adult inhabitants by administrative regions (voivodeships). The number of hospital admissions per 100,000 adult inhabitants in Opolskie (411.5), Wielkopolskie (469.0), Małoposkie (471.4) and Zachodniopomorskie (475.1) Voivodeships was almost two times lower than in Kujawsko-pomorskie (829.6) and Podkarpackie (987.9) Voivodeships (Table 2). Over one-quarter of all hospital admissions to urological departments took place in Śląskie and Mazowieckie Voivodeships (Table 2).

Table 2.

Regional differences in the number of hospital admissions to urological departments in Poland in 2022

Voivodeship Number of hospital admissions Hospital admissions per 100,000 adult inhabitants Percentage of total admissions
Dolnośląskie 13,574 530.1 6.3
Kujawsko-pomorskie 14,533 829.6 6.8
Lubelskie 13,972 788.8 6.5
Lubuskie 5,592 651.1 2.6
Łódzkie 17,258 817.0 8.1
Małopolskie 13,811 471.4 6.5
Mazowieckie 31,323 663.6 14.6
Opolskie 3,451 411.5 1.6
Podkarpackie 17,707 987.9 8.3
Podlaskie 5,708 575.3 2.7
Pomorskie 14,865 737.3 6.9
Śląskie 24,922 649.6 11.6
Świętokrzyskie 8,051 766.9 3.8
Warmińsko-mazurskie 8,335 701.0 3.9
Wielkopolskie 14,038 469.0 6.6
Zachodniopomorskie 6,923 475.1 3.2
Total 214,063 692.4 100.0

Age of the patients admitted to urological departments

Most of the patients (58.8%) admitted to urological departments were aged 60–79 years, wherein there were 39564 hospital admissions of patients aged 65–69 years and 38065 hospital admissions of patients aged 70–74 years (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of patients admitted to urological departments by age group.

Epidemiological characteristics of patients admitted to urological departments

One-quarter of hospitalizations (24.6%) were one-day hospitalizations (<24 h). The mean duration of hospitalization was 2.93 ±3.62 days, median of 2 days. When excluding one-day hospitalizations, the mean duration of hospitalization was 3.89 ±3.69 days, a median of 2 days. Almost all of the patients (99.1%) were hospitalized in one ward (only the urological department, without transfer to other wards). A total of 716 (0.3%) in-hospital deaths were reported. Most of the patients were admitted to urological departments due to genitourinary diseases (59%) or cancers (36%), and 5% of patients were admitted due to other medical conditions (Table 3). Kidney and ureteral stones (19.9%) was the most common cause of admission to urological departments (Table 3). Out of all genitourinary cancers, bladder cancer (15.2%) was the most common cause of admission. One-tenth of hospital admissions were caused by hyperplasia of the prostate (Table 3). In general, diseases of male genital organs (N40-N51) accounted for 16.6% of all hospital admissions to urological departments According to the data available in the nationwide registry, physicians working in urological departments reported that only 16.7% of patients admitted to urological departments had comorbidities (Table 3).

Table 3.

Characteristics of patients admitted to urological departments in 2022

Overall n = 214,063
Variable n %
Gender
 male 155,349 72.6
 female 58,714 27.4
Age
 18–29 8,959 4.2
 30–39 13,737 6.4
 40–49 18,649 8.7
 50–59 27,768 13.0
 60–69 67,061 31.3
 70–79 58,885 27.5
 80–89 17,531 8.2
 90+ 1,473 0.7
One-day hospitalization (<24 h)
 yes 52,573 24.6
 no 161,490 75.4
Duration of hospitalization (days) 2.93 ±3.62
mean ±SD; median (min–max) 2 (0–275)
Duration of hospitalization when excluded one-day hospitalizations (days) (n = 161,490) 3.89 ±3.69
mean ±SD; median (min–max) 2 (1–275)
Type of admission
 emergency 37,669 17.6
 scheduled 176,394 82.4
Number of hospital wards
 1 212,219 99.1
 2 927 0.4
 3 820 0.4
 4 48 0.1
 5 49 0.1
Cause of admission
 cancers (C00-C97; D00-D48) 76,957 36.0
  prostate cancer (C61) 13,123 6.1
  kidney cancer (C64) 5,402 2.5
  bladder cancer (C67) 32,553 15.2
  neoplasm of uncertain or unknown behaviour of male genital organs (D40) 6,535 3.1
  neoplasm of uncertain or unknown behaviour of urinary organs (D41) 15,207 7.1
 genitourinary diseases (N00-N99) 126,270 59.0
  obstructive and reflux uropathy (N13) 20,975 9.8
  kidney and ureteral stones (N20) 42,504 19.9
  stones of lower urinary tract (N21) 3,085 1.4
  unspecified renal colic (N23) 1,058 0.5
  urethral stricture (N35) 5,486 2.6
  hyperplasia of prostate (N40) 21,382 10.0
  redundant prepuce, phimosis and paraphimosis (N47) 5,287 2.5
  other causes 10,836 5.0
In-hospital death
 yes 716 0.3
 no 213,347 99.7
Data on comorbidities reported in the registry
 yes 35,780 16.7
 no 178,283 83.3

Age-differences in the causes of hospital admissions to urological departments

The highest hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants was observed among adults aged 70–79 years (1,925.8 per 100,000 inhabitants). The hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants for all major causes of hospitalization doubled in a group aged 50–59 years (610.6) compared to a group aged 40–49 (317.8). Moreover, a markable increase in hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants was observed between 50–59 and 60–69 years. Details are presented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Causes of hospital admission to urological department by age groups in Poland in 2022

18–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70–79 80+
Overall (all causes of hospitalizations in urological departments) n 8,959 13,737 18,649 27,768 67,061 58,885 19,004
rate per 100,000 184.8 232.0 317.8 610.6 1,328.0 1,925.8 1,171.3
Kidney cancer (C64) n 20 116 468 890 1,830 1,732 346
rate per 100,000 0.4 2.0 8.0 19.6 36.2 56.6 21.3
Bladder cancer (C67) n 45 181 690 2,590 11,273 12,733 5,041
rate per 100,000 0.9 3.1 11.8 56.9 223.2 416.4 310.7
Obstructive and reflux uropathy (N13) n 1,072 1,795 2,367 3,007 5,946 4,767 2,021
rate per 100,000 22.1 30.3 40.3 66.1 117.7 155.9 124.6
Kidney and ureteral stones (N20) n 2,489 5,752 7,752 8,491 10,971 5,832 1,227
rate per 100,000 51.3 97.1 132.1 186.7 217.3 190.7 75.6
Stones of lower urinary tract (N21) n 55 105 130 293 1,063 1,067 372
rate per 100,000 1.1 1.8 2.2 6.4 21.0 34.9 22.9
Unspecified renal colic (N23) n 163 188 222 200 185 83 17
rate per 100,000 3.4 3.2 3.8 4.4 3.7 2.7 1.0
Urethral stricture (N35) n 165 268 349 476 1,631 1,885 712
rate per 100,000 3.4 4.5 5.9 10.5 32.3 61.6 43.9
Prostate cancer (C61) n 1 2 180 1,529 6,459 4,316 636
rate per 100,000 (only males) 0.0 0.1 6.1 68.3 278.5 345.0 127.3
Hyperplasia of prostate (N40) n 8 33 271 1,958 8,393 8,423 2,296
rate per 100,000 (only males) 0.3 1.1 9.2 87.5 361.9 673.2 459.7
Redundant prepuce, phimosis and paraphimosis (N47) n 1,472 638 586 552 883 782 374
rate per 100,000 (only males) 59.6 21.2 19.8 24.7 38.1 62.5 74.9

n – number of patients; SD – standard deviation

Characteristics of patients admitted to urological departments with common urological conditions

Three-quarters of patients hospitalized due to bladder cancer were males (Table 5), the mean age was 70.2 years, and the mean duration of hospitalization was 3 days. One-third of hospitalizations led to the completion of the therapeutic or diagnostic process, and 66.9% ended up with a referral for further treatment in the outpatient clinic (Table 5). Out of all patients admitted due to kidney and ureteral stones, 57.2% were males, the mean age was 54.4 years, almost one-quarter of admissions were in emergency mode, and 23.5% lasted less than 24 hours (Table 5). Most of the patients hospitalized due to obstructive and reflux uropathy were females (52.1%), the mean age was 60.4 years and 23% of patients had comorbidities. One-third of patients (30.6%) were admitted in emergency mode and 28% of hospital admissions lasted less than 24 hours (Table 5). The mean age of patients admitted due to prostate cancer was 67.3 years and the mean duration of hospitalization was 4 days (Table 6). Among patients admitted due to hyperplasia of the prostate, the mean age was 69.4 years and the mean duration of hospitalization was 2.9 days. Among males admitted due to prostate cancer or hyperplasia, approximately one-third of admissions ended up with completion of the therapeutic or diagnostic process (Table 6).

Table 5.

Epidemiological characteristics of patients admitted to urological departments due to bladder cancer, kidney and ureteral stones or uropathy in Poland in 2022

Cause of admission to urological department
bladder cancer (C67) n = 32,553 kidney and ureteral stones (N20) n = 42,504 obstructive and reflux uropathy (N13) n = 20,975
Variable n % n % n %
Gender
 male 24,346 74.8 24,308 57.2 10,040 47.9
 female 8,207 25.2 18,196 42.8 10,935 52.1
Age
 mean ±SD; median; min–max 70.2 ±9.5 54.4 ±15.1 60.4 ±16.2
 median; min–max 70; 18–99 56; 18–98 64; 18–104
Type of admission
 emergency 3,227 9.9 9,994 23.5 6,423 30.6
 scheduled 29,326 90.1 32,510 76.5 14,552 69.4
Duration of hospitalization
 mean ±SD 3.0 ±4.4 2.6 ±2.7 2.8 ±3.7
 median; min–max 2; 0–275 2; 0–98 2; 0–140
 <24 hours 5,685 17.5 9,993 23.5 5,864 28.0
 1 day 2,191 6.7 3,179 7.5 2,294 10.9
 2 days 12,553 38.6 12,719 29.9 4,336 20.7
 3 days 4,468 13.7 6,422 15.1 2,623 12.5
 4 days or more 7,656 23.5 10,191 24.0 5858 27.9
In-hospital death
 yes 159 0.5 28 0.1 100 0.5
 no 32,394 95.5 42,476 99.9 20,875 99.5
Number of hospital wards
 1 32,185 98.9 42,363 99.7 20,804 99.2
 2 or more 368 1.1 141 0.3 171 0.8
Data on comorbidities reported in the registry
 yes 4,906 15.1 5,315 12.5 4,820 23.0
 no 27,647 84.9 37,189 87.5 16,155 77.0

n – number of patients; SD – standard deviation

Table 6.

Epidemiological characteristics of males admitted to urological departments due to prostate diseases in Poland in 2022

Variable Cause of admission to urological department
prostate cancer (C61) n = 13,123 hyperplasia of prostate (N40) n = 21,382
n % n %
Age
 mean ±SD 67.3 ±7.3 69.4 ±8.2
 median; min–max 67; 29–98 70; 20–99
Type of admission
 emergency 1,111 8.5 1,546 7.2
 scheduled 12,012 91.5 19,836 92.8
Duration of hospitalization
 mean ±SD 4.0 ±3.7 2.9 ±3.1
 median; min-max 4; 0–121 2; 0–120
 <24 hours 2,488 19.0 6,318 29.5
 1 day 445 3.4 1,248 5.8
 2 days 828 6.3 3,307 15.5
 3 days 2,466 18.8 3,516 16.4
 4 days or more 6,896 52.5 6,993 32.7
Outcome of hospitalization In-hospital death
 yes 30 0.2 8 0.0
 no 13,093 99.8 21,374 99.9
Number of hospital wards
 1 13,011 99.1 21,318 99.7
 2 or more 112 0.9 64 0.3
Presence of comorbidities according to discharge card
 yes 1,651 12.6 3,639 17.0
 no 11,472 87.4 17,743 83.0

n – number of patients; SD – standard deviation

DISCUSSION

This is the first characteristic of patients admitted to urological departments carried out based on a nationwide registry that provides detailed epidemiological data on inpatient urological care in Poland. In 2022, 214,063 hospital admissions to urological departments were reported, without markable seasonal differences in particular months. There were significant differences in the urological hospitalization rates between the administrative regions (Voivodeships) that point out potential health inequalities in urological care. Over 70% of patients admitted to urological departments were males and the most of the patients were aged 65–74 years. One-quarter of hospitalizations lasted up to 24 hours and were related to one-day surgery and diagnosis. Kidney and ureteral stones (19.9%), bladder cancer (15.2%), and hyperplasia of the prostate (10%) were the most common causes of admission to the urological department.

In 2022, over 200,000 hospital admissions to urological departments were reported, which confirms that urological care is a significant part of inpatient medical care. There were no markable seasonal differences in the number of hospital admissions per month, with a slight decrease in the first two months of the year. Since March 2022, most of the anti-epidemic restrictions have been lifted which may lead to an increase in the number of hospital admissions between February and March 2022 [23].

This nationwide registry-based study revealed significant (up to twofold) differences in urological hospitalization rates between administrative regions in Poland. This observation may result from the access to urological care services in particular regions. Moreover, further analyses are needed to assess the regional differences in the exposure to urological disease risk factors [24]. Health policymakers should use the findings from this study to reduce health inequalities in access to urological care in Poland.

Gender and age are well-known factors associated with the risk of urological diseases [25, 26]. For example, gender discrepancy exists in the incidence of kidney cancer, bladder cancer, and urolithiasis, with a higher prevalence among males [25, 26]. Findings from this study revealed that 72% of patients admitted to urological departments were males. However, the prevalence of kidney and ureteral stones was only slightly higher among males which is in line with the previously reported data on the prevalence of urolithiasis and its risk factors like obesity [27]. Out of all major causes of admission to urological departments, obstructive and reflux uropathy was more common among females than males. Older age is a risk factor for numerous urological diseases, especially among males (diseases of the prostate) [28, 29]. In 2022. the highest urological hospitalization rate was observed among adults aged 65–74 years. We can hypothesize that reaching retirement age (65 years for men) has an impact on the attitudes towards urological screening and visiting urologists that lead to hospitalization due to urological conditions. Age differences in hospital admissions to the urological department presented in this study may be used by urologists to assess the age of diagnosis of urological diseases and monitor current trends in urological disease onset.

One-day surgery and diagnosis are growing trends in healthcare, including urological care [13]. Findings from this study revealed that one-quarter of admissions to the urological department were one-day hospitalizations. This observation suggests that one-day hospitalizations are a significant part of urological care and may contribute to increasing the effectiveness of healthcare in Poland. Moreover, most of the urological hospitalizations ended within 3 days, but almost one-quarter of patients were hospitalized for 4 days or more. Over half of males admitted due to prostate cancer were hospitalized for 4 days and over. This observation suggests that particular attention should be paid to the quality of urological care of patients with prostate cancer and the development of novel techniques and surgical methods that may shorten the duration of hospitalization [30]. There were only 716 in-hospital deaths (0.3% of all urological hospitalizations) which suggests that the safety of procedures provided in urological departments is high and patients admitted to urological departments are in general good condition.

Data used in this study were collected as a part of public statistics and aggregated into a nationwide registry. Previously published data based on the same registry indicated that physicians performing one-day surgical procedures (e.g., ophthalmologists taking care of patients with cataracts) miss comorbidities in discharge records [21]. Findings from this registry-based study revealed that 16.7% of patients admitted to the urological departments had comorbidities, which is lower than the prevalence of comorbidities in a general population (up to 50% of the population) [31]. This observation suggests that urologists did not follow guidelines on data reporting on comorbidities of patients admitted to urological departments, especially patients admitted for one-day surgeries.

Practical implications

Findings from this study provide precise epidemiological data on inpatient urological care in Poland. Demographic characteristics of patients hospitalized in urological departments may be used to forecast further needs for urological care for the elderly population. Data on the duration of hospitalization and outcomes of hospitalization may be used by urologists and policymakers to evaluate the current quality of urological care in Poland. Regional differences in urological hospitalizations presented in this study point out an urgent need to remove barriers to access to urological procedures. Moreover, findings from this study suggest that data reporting should be improved and there is a need to educate urologists on the importance of public statistics and data reporting (especially those related to medical history and comorbidities) that pose a basis for policymaking. Data presented in this study may be also used for comparisons between urological departments and benchmarking related to the demographic characteristics of the patients, duration of care, and its outcome.

This is a registry-based study, and the scope of analysis is limited to data available in datasets collected within the nationwide registry. Data on procedures performed during the hospitalization were not available, so the impact of surgical techniques on the outcomes of hospitalizations was not analyzed. Datasets were anonymous, so patients re-hospitalized after 30 days from the first admission cannot be identified. Data on comorbidities should be analyzed carefully, as the low prevalence of comorbidities presented in this study may result from the insufficient attention paid to the data coding (mostly in patients admitted to one-day surgical procedures) by physicians rather than the health status of the population.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that most of the patients admitted to urological departments were males and the significant peak in hospital admissions was observed after 60 years of age. Significant regional differences in the hospitalization rates in urological departments were observed. Almost every fourth patient admitted to the urological department was discharged within 24 hours. Kidney and ureteral stones, bladder cancer, and prostate hyperplasia were the most common causes of hospital admis-sions. Data presented in this study may be used by physicians and policymakers to evaluate and im-prove inpatient urological care in Poland (especially access to healthcare services and quality of data reporting) and forecast demand for urological care.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to the Department of Population Health Monitoring and Analysis, National Institute of Public Health – National Research Institute in Warsaw for data sharing.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A, Sindhwani P, Ekwenna O. Global Trends in Incidence and Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study Data. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 35: 37–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Öztürk R, Murt A. Epidemiology of urological infections: a global burden. World J Urol. 2020; 38: 2669–2679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tian YQ, Yang JC, Hu JJ, Ding R, Ye DW, Shang JW. Trends and risk factors of global incidence, mortality, and disability of genitourinary cancers from 1990 to 2019: Systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Front Public Health. 2023; 11: 1119374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.GBD 2019 Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Collaborators . The global, regional, and national burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia in 204 countries and territories from 2000 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022; 3: e754-e776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zi H, He SH, Leng XY, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of kidney, bladder, and prostate cancers and their attributable risk factors, 1990–2019. Mil Med Res. 2021; 8: 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heldwein FL, Loeb S, Wroclawski ML, et al. A Systematic Review on Guidelines and Recommendations for Urology Standard of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 6: 1070–1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Supreme Medical Chamber of the Republic of Poland . Statistical information. Available online: https://nil.org.pl/rejestry/centralny-rejestr-lekarzy/informacje-statystyczne (accessed on January 19, 2024).
  • 8.Zgliczyński WS, Jankowski M, Rostkowska O, et al. Public and private health care services in the opinion of physicians in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020; 33: 195–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sagan A, Panteli D, Borkowski W, et al. Poland health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011; 13: 1–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Healthcare facilities dataset . Urology. Available online: https://swiatprzychodni.pl/specjalnosci/urolog/ (accessed on: January 19, 2024).
  • 11.Srinivasan A, Wang R. An Update on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Techniques, Risks, and Efficacy. World J Mens Health. 2020; 38: 402–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Amparore D, Campi R, Checcucci E, et al. Forecasting the Future of Urology Practice: A Comprehensive Review of the Recommendations by International and European Associations on Priority Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 6: 1032–1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ambusaidi H, Alshuaibi MK, Colau A, Dominique I, Mouton M, Sebe P. Day of surgery admission in urology: Patient criteria and the organization required for same-day admission in urology: A retrospective study. Urol Ann. 2023; 15: 368–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ratajczak JM, Gawrońska A, Fischer M, Hladun T, Marczak M. Can We Identify Patients in Danger of Delayed Treatment? Management of COVID-19 Pandemic Backlog in Urology Care in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19: 16547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Antoniewicz AA, Niemczyk W, Regulski PA, Niezgodka M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urological care in Poland - Post-COVID resilience scenarios and recommendations for healthcare system: A national population-based modelling study. Archives of Medical Science. 2021. doi: 10.5114/aoms/144310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rajwa P, Przydacz M, Krajewski W, et al. Changing patterns of urologic emergency visits and admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study. Arch Med Sci. 2020; 17: 1262–1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Poznańska A, Goryński P, Seroka W, Stokwiszewski J, Radomski P, Wojtyniak B. Nationwide General Hospital Morbidity Study as a source of data about Polish population health. Przegl Epidemiol. 2019; 73: 69–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.World Health Organization (WHO) . ICD-10 Version: 2010. Available online: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2010/en (accessed on January 19, 2024).
  • 19.Ordinance of the Ministry of Health on May 17, 2012 on the system of departmental identification codes and the detailed method of assigning them . Polish Jorunal of Laws, 2019, item 173. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kanecki K, Nitsch-Osuch A, Goryński P, et al. Hospitalizations for COVID-19 in Poland: a study based on data from a national hospital register. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021; 131: 535–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kamińska A, Pinkas J, Goryński P, Jankowski M. A National Registry-Based Epidemiological Study to Evaluate 395 646 Patients Hospitalized Due to Eye Diseases in Poland in 2019. Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29: e939351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Statistics of Poland. Statistical Yearbooks . Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2022. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/statistical-yearbooks/statistical-yearbooks/demographic-yearbook-of-poland-2022,3,16.html (accessed on January 19, 2024).
  • 23.Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 25 March 2022 on establishing specific restrictions, orders, and prohibitions in relation to the state of epidemic. Polish Journal of Laws, 2022, item 673. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ufuah S, Tallman JE, Moses KA. The Pursuit of Health Equity and Equality in Urologic Oncology: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going. Eur Urol Focus. 2021; 7: 929–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deltourbe L, Lacerda Mariano L, Hreha TN, Hunstad DA, Ingersoll MA. The impact of biological sex on diseases of the urinary tract. Mucosal Immunol. 2022; 15: 857–866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Doshi B, Athans SR, Woloszynska A. Biological differences underlying sex and gender disparities in bladder cancer: current synopsis and future directions. Oncogenesis. 2023; 12: 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seitz C, Fajkovic H. Epidemiological genderspecific aspects in urolithiasis. World J Urol. 2013; 31: 1087–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Faure Walker N, Gill B, Olsburgh J, et al. Age-related urologic problems in the complex urologic patient. World J Urol. 2021; 39: 1037–1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Welén K, Damber JE. Androgens, aging, and prostate health. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022; 23: 1221–1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gandaglia G, Schatteman P, De Naeyer G, D’Hondt F, Mottrie A. Novel Technologies in Urologic Surgery: a Rapidly Changing Scenario. Curr Urol Rep. 2016; 17: 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gańczak M, Miazgowski T, Kożybska M, et al. Changes in disease burden in Poland between 1990–2017 in comparison with other Central European countries: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0226766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Central European Journal of Urology are provided here courtesy of Polish Urological Association

RESOURCES