Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1987 Oct;391:1–11. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016721

Human muscle strength training: the effects of three different regimens and the nature of the resultant changes.

D A Jones 1, O M Rutherford 1
PMCID: PMC1192197  PMID: 3443943

Abstract

1. Increases in strength and size of the quadriceps muscle have been compared during 12 weeks of either isometric or dynamic strength training. 2. Isometric training of one leg resulted in a significant increase in force (35 +/- 19%, mean +/- S.D., n = 6) with no change in the contralateral untrained control leg. 3. Quadriceps cross-sectional area was measured from mid-thigh X-ray computerized tomography (c.t.) scans before and after training. The increase in area (5 +/- 4.6%, mean +/- S.D., n = 6) was smaller than, and not correlated with, the increase in strength. 4. The possibility that the stimulus for gain in strength is the high force developed in the muscle was examined by comparing two training regimes, one where the muscle shortened (concentric) and the other where the muscle was stretched (eccentric) during the training exercise. Forces generated during eccentric training were 45% higher than during concentric training. 5. Similar changes in strength and muscle cross-sectional area were found after the two forms of exercise. Eccentric exercise increased isometric force by 11 +/- 3.6% (mean +/- S.D., n = 6), and concentric training by 15 +/- 8.0% (mean +/- S.D., n = 6). In both cases there was an approximate 5% increase in cross-sectional area. 6. It is concluded that as a result of strength training the main change in the first 12 weeks is an increase in the force generated per unit cross-sectional area of muscle. The stimulus for this is unknown but comparison of the effects of eccentric and concentric training suggest it is unlikely to be solely mechanical stress or metabolic fluxes in the muscle.

Full text

PDF
1

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., BIGLAND B., RITCHIE J. M. The physiological cost of negative work. J Physiol. 1952 Jul;117(3):380–390. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigland-Ritchie B., Woods J. J. Integrated electromyogram and oxygen uptake during positive and negative work. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):267–277. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulcke J. A., Termote J. L., Palmers Y., Crolla D. Computed tomography of the human skeletal muscular system. Neuroradiology. 1979 Mar 23;17(3):127–136. doi: 10.1007/BF00339869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bárány M., Close R. I. The transformation of myosin in cross-innervated rat muscles. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(2):455–474. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards R. H., Young A., Hosking G. P., Jones D. A. Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1977 Mar;52(3):283–290. doi: 10.1042/cs0520283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grindrod S., Tofts P., Edwards R. Investigation of human skeletal muscle structure and composition by X-ray computerised tomography. Eur J Clin Invest. 1983 Dec;13(6):465–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1983.tb00130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horber F. F., Scheidegger J. R., Grünig B. E., Frey F. J. Thigh muscle mass and function in patients treated with glucocorticoids. Eur J Clin Invest. 1985 Dec;15(6):302–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1985.tb00276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ikai M., Fukunaga T. A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol. 1970;28(3):173–180. doi: 10.1007/BF00696025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz B. The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol. 1939 Jun 14;96(1):45–64. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Komi P. V., Buskirk E. R. Effect of eccentric and concentric muscle conditioning on tension and electrical activity of human muscle. Ergonomics. 1972 Jul;15(4):417–434. doi: 10.1080/00140137208924444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindh M. Increase of muscle strength from isometric quadriceps exercises at different knee angles. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1979;11(1):33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MacDougall J. D., Elder G. C., Sale D. G., Moroz J. R., Sutton J. R. Effects of strength training and immobilization on human muscle fibres. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980 Feb;43(1):25–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00421352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MacDougall J. D., Sale D. G., Elder G. C., Sutton J. R. Muscle ultrastructural characteristics of elite powerlifters and bodybuilders. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1982;48(1):117–126. doi: 10.1007/BF00421171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McDonagh M. J., Davies C. T. Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;52(2):139–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00433384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moritani T., deVries H. A. Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. Am J Phys Med. 1978 Dec;57(6):263–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rasch P. J. The present status of negative (eccentric) exercise: a review. Am Correct Ther J. 1974 May-Jun;28(3):77–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rutherford O. M., Greig C. A., Sargeant A. J., Jones D. A. Strength training and power output: transference effects in the human quadriceps muscle. J Sports Sci. 1986 Autumn;4(2):101–107. doi: 10.1080/02640418608732105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rutherford O. M., Jones D. A., Newham D. J. Clinical and experimental application of the percutaneous twitch superimposition technique for the study of human muscle activation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1288–1291. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.11.1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rutherford O. M., Jones D. A. The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55(1):100–105. doi: 10.1007/BF00422902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schiaffino S., Bormioli S. P., Aloisi M. Cell proliferation in rat skeletal muscle during early stages of compensatory hypertrophy. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol. 1972;11(3):268–273. doi: 10.1007/BF02889406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seliger V., Dolejs L., Karas V., Pachlopníková I. Adaptation of trained athletes' energy expediture to repeated concentric and eccentric muscle contractions. Int Z Angew Physiol. 1968;26(3):227–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00695111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tesch P. A., Larsson L. Muscle hypertrophy in bodybuilders. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1982;49(3):301–306. doi: 10.1007/BF00441291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thorstensson A., Hultén B., von Döbeln W., Karlsson J. Effect of strength training on enzyme activities and fibre characteristics in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Mar;96(3):392–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb10207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Young A., Stokes M., Round J. M., Edwards R. H. The effect of high-resistance training on the strength and cross-sectional area of the human quadriceps. Eur J Clin Invest. 1983 Oct;13(5):411–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1983.tb00122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Young A. The relative isometric strength of type I and type II muscle fibres in the human quadriceps. Clin Physiol. 1984 Feb;4(1):23–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1984.tb00641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES