Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1987 Oct;391:193–207. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016733

Cold stimulation of teeth: a comparison between the responses of cat intradental A delta and C fibres and human sensation.

E Jyväsjärvi 1, K D Kniffki 1
PMCID: PMC1192209  PMID: 3443945

Abstract

1. In nembutal-anaesthetized cats, the responses of intradental A delta and C fibres to rapid cooling of the crown of canine teeth were studied. 2. Single-unit recordings were obtained from a total of eighty-six intradental A delta and C fibres. The mean conduction velocity of A delta fibres was 13.9 m/s (n = 43; range: 3.6-26.0 m/s), that of C fibres was 1.3 m/s (n = 43; range: 0.5-2.2 m/s). 3. In the intact tooth none of the identified A delta or C fibres showed any ongoing activity in the absence of intentional stimulation. 4. 84% of the A delta fibres (thirty-six out of forty-three) and 88% of the C fibres thirty-eight out of forty-three) were excited by cold stimulation of the canine tooth they were innervating. 5. For all cold-sensitive A delta fibres the responses to rapid lowering of the tooth temperature were rather uniform. After an initial high-frequency discharge during the most rapid change in temperature, the discharge rate fell as the rate of change of temperature became smaller, and firing stopped completely when the temperature had reached a steady level. No firing occurred as the tooth temperature returned to its initial value. 6. A good linear correlation (r = 0.89) was found between the initial dynamic discharge of responding A delta fibres and the maximum rate of change of temperature achieved in a particular experiment. 7. The response behaviour of C fibres to rapid cooling of the tooth was also rather uniform but different from that of A delta fibres. For C fibres no initial dynamic response phase was observed. After a mean latency of 7.3 s the fibres began to discharge regularly at a low rate at a time when the change of tooth temperature was already small. 8. The firing rate of the C fibres had a weak linear correlation (r = 0.6) with the static tooth temperature achieved. No discharge was observed as the temperature returned to its initial value. 9. For eleven cold-sensitive A delta and C fibres the receptive fields were determined by mechanical stimulation of the exposed pulp tissue. For A delta fibres the receptive fields were located at the pulp-dentine border, those for C fibres were located much deeper in the pulp and tended to have higher mechanical thresholds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
193

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahlquist M. L., Edwall L. G., Franzén O. G., Haegerstam G. A. Perception of pulpal pain as a function of intradental nerve activity. Pain. 1984 Aug;19(4):353–366. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90081-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brännström M., Johnson G. Movements of the dentine and pulp liquids on application of thermal stimuli. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1970 Mar;28(1):59–70. doi: 10.3109/00016357009033132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byers M. R., Neuhaus S. J., Gehrig J. D. Dental sensory receptor structure in human teeth. Pain. 1982 Jul;13(3):221–235. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwall L., Scott D., Jr Influence of changes in microcirculation on the excitability of the sensory unit in the tooth of the cat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Aug;82(4):555–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb05002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuss Z., Trowbridge H., Bender I. B., Rickoff B., Sorin S. Assessment of reliability of electrical and thermal pulp testing agents. J Endod. 1986 Jul;12(7):301–305. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80112-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Matthews B. Responses of intradental nerves to electrical and thermal stimulation of teeth in dogs. J Physiol. 1977 Jan;264(3):641–664. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Närhi M. V., Hirvonen T. J., Hakumäki M. O. Activation of intradental nerves in the dog to some stimuli applied to the dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 1982;27(12):1053–1058. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(82)90011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Närhi M. V. The characteristics of intradental sensory units and their responses to stimulation. J Dent Res. 1985 Apr;64(Spec No):564–571. doi: 10.1177/002203458506400411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Närhi M., Jyväsjärvi E., Hirvonen T., Huopaniemi T. Activation of heat-sensitive nerve fibres in the dental pulp of the cat. Pain. 1982;14(4):317–326. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Trowbridge H. O., Franks M., Korostoff E., Emling R. Sensory response to thermal stimulation in human teeth. J Endod. 1980 Jan;6(1):405–412. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80216-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WAGERS P. W., SMITH C. M. Responses in dental nerves of dogs to tooth stimulation and the effects of systemically administered procaine, lidocaine and morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1960 Sep;130:89–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yamada M., Suzuta K., Higuchi H. Sensitivity of the tooth to thermal stimulation. Jpn J Physiol. 1968 Jun 15;18(3):310–325. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.18.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES