Abstract
1. Corneal endothelial cell membrane electrical resistance is estimated at about 400 M omega by using intracellular micro-electrodes. 2. If all ion diffusion across the endothelium were transcellular, electrical resistance of the endothelial monolayer would be about 1300 omega cm2, as there are about 3000 cells mm-2. 3. Measured endothelial monolayer resistance is 12.7 +/- 0.8 omega cm2 (mean +/- S.E., n = 6), which indicates that about 99% of ion diffusion does not cross the transcellular pathway, but must pass through the paracellular route. Arguments are presented which suggest that the proportion may be even higher. 4. Endothelial passive ion permeabilities are about the same as corneal stromal passive ion permeabilities. 5. Stromal water diffusional permeability is about the same as stromal ion permeability, after allowance is made for free diffusion coefficients. In contrast, endothelial water diffusional permeability is so high as to be unmeasurable. 6. It is concluded that ions diffuse across the corneal endothelium through the paracellular route, and that water diffuses across the endothelium mainly through the transcellular route.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- DONN A., MILLER S. L., MALLETT N. M. WATER PERMEABILITY OF THE LIVING CORNEA. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963 Oct;70:515–521. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1963.00960050517015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dikstein S., Maurice D. M. The metabolic basis to the fluid pump in the cornea. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):29–41. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodson S., Miller F. The bicarbonate ion pump in the endothelium which regulates the hydration of rabbit cornea. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(3):563–577. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodson S. The regulation of corneal hydration by a salt pump requiring the presence of sodium and bicarbonate ions. J Physiol. 1974 Jan;236(2):271–302. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodson S., Wigham C. The permeability of rabbit and human corneal endothelium. J Physiol. 1983 Sep;342:409–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klyce S. D., Russell S. R. Numerical solution of coupled transport equations applied to corneal hydration dynamics. J Physiol. 1979 Jul;292:107–134. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liebovitch L. S., Fischbarg J., Koatz R. Osmotic water permeability of rabbit corneal endothelium and its dependence on ambient concentration. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Aug 6;646(1):71–76. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90273-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim J. J., Ussing H. H. Analysis of presteady-state Na+ fluxes across the rabbit corneal endothelium. J Membr Biol. 1982;65(3):197–204. doi: 10.1007/BF01869963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maurice D. M. Cellular membrane activity in the corneal endothelium of the intact eye. Experientia. 1968 Nov 15;24(11):1094–1095. doi: 10.1007/BF02147776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mishima S., Hedbys B. O. The permeability of the corneal epithelium and endothelium to water. Exp Eye Res. 1967 Jan;6(1):10–32. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(67)80049-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]