Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2025 Mar 7;16:1508584. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1508584

The ability to detach from biofilms in the lung airways prior to transmission to another host is associated with the infectious phenotype of Mycobacterium abscessus

Bailey Keefe 1,, Amy Leestemaker-Palmer 1,, Luiz E Bermudez 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC11925935  PMID: 40124375

Abstract

Introduction

Mycobacterium abscessus is a pathogen recently associated with patients with chronic lung conditions such as bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis. M. abscessus is an environmental bacterium but recent evidence suggests that the pathogen is also transmitted from host-to-host. Because M. abscessus is known to form biofilms on the respiratory mucosa the release of bacteria from the biofilm becomes an important aspect on the transmission of the infection.

Methods

A biofilm releasing system was established. A transposon library of M. abscessus was then screened to identify genes associated with the release from biofilms.

Results

Several enzymes and genes of unidentified function were linked with the ability to detach from the biofilm. It was also shown that detached bacteria were increased capable of establish a new biofilm, attach to epithelial cells, and infect macrophages. To determine the surface molecules linked with the ability to infect new hosts, a surface proteomic was performed, showing that detaching bacteria express many proteins do not present in biofilm bacteria.

Discussion

Detached M. abscessus, one of the possible infectious phenotypes, contains specific proteins and lipids in the surface that facilitate the infection of new hosts. In addition, we identified many small proteins that have the likelihood to be associated with the release of the biofilm bacteria.

Keywords: mycobacterium abscessus, biofilm, detachment, infectious phenotype, host bacterial surface, macrophages, uptake

Introduction

Pulmonary infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus have been increasingly identified in individuals with chronic lung pathologies, such as emphysema, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis (13). All three subspecies of M. abscessus, i.e., M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. Bolletii, and M. abscessus subsp. masssiliense, are resistant to the majority of available antibiotics, making the treatment of patients quite challenging (3, 4).

There is evidence that M. abscessus has evolved recently in order to adapt to the airway environment of humans harboring the risk factors (5, 6). Not only is the infection becoming more common, but additional evidence of genome evolution has also emerged (7, 8). A few clones of the pathogen have been isolated from infections in the respiratory tracts of patients, which suggests rapid evolution allowing for adaptation to the environment.

One of the strategies by which environmental bacteria adapt to mammalian host infections is the inherent ability to form a biofilm (BF). Studies and clinical experience have shown that M. abscessus uses that resource to initiate and maintain a niche or niches on the airway mucosal surface in patients with chronic lung pathologies (9, 10). To achieve this, the bacterium rapidly needs to establish and develop the biofilm structure before being challenged by the host immune cells or anti-bacterial products secreted by the host cells. We have previously described how M. abscessus responds to the environmental conditions of the airways with the efficient formation of biofilm (9). It is apparent that the bacterium uses the magnesium concentration in the mucus of cystic fibrosis patients to quickly adhere to the respiratory mucosa and develop a robust biofilm (911). It is also puzzling that the pathogen uses the host DNA existing in the airways as a carbon source, which apparently also has a role in the transition from the planktonic to the biofilm phenotype (12).

Considering all the accumulated pieces of information and adding the recent evidence that M. abscessus can be also transmitted among cystic fibrosis patients, in many cases, within the shared environment of a clinic waiting room or other facilities (7), we hypothesized the bacteria being released from airway biofilms would most likely represent an infectious phenotype of the pathogen. In fact, the ability to detach from biofilm can be linked with additional site seeding in the airways which would have implications in the extension of the disease. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms associated with the infection will allow for the development of prevention measures or potentially the elimination of the disease in the at-risk population.

To address the question, we established an in vitro set of assays to identify detached organisms and the genes associated with the ability. Our findings identified many genetic components pointing to an association with genes and encoded proteins linked to surface structures and the transport mechanisms that exist to export these proteins to the bacterial surface. Further studies determined that some of these proteins participate in the attachment to bronchial epithelial cells.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth

Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus strain 19977 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). M. abscessus subsp. abscessus strains 00103 and 01715 (obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis) were a gift from Jerry Nick and Charles Daley from the National Jewish Health Hospital. All three strains were of the in vitro smooth phenotype. Unless otherwise noted, bacteria for assays were grown and maintained on Middlebrook 7H10 agar supplemented with 10% oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase (OADC; Hardy Diagnostics), referred to as 7H10. For liquid cultures, bacteria were grown in 7H9 broth supplemented with Tween-80 and OADC, referred to as 7H9. All the cultures were grown at 37°C for 3 to 5 days. The bacteria used in the assays were of the planktonic phenotype initially. Every assay was controlled by microscopic observation so that the inoculum completely dispersed.

Host cell tissue culture

Human monocyte THP-1 (TIB-202) and HEp-2 (CCL-23) pharyngeal epithelial cells were obtained from the ATCC and grown in RMPI-1640 (RPMI) and DMEM sterile media containing L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES (Corning Life Sciences), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gemini Bio-products, Sacramento, CA). Both cell types were obtained from the ATCC and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Generation of secondary biofilms in either HBSS or SCFM media

M. abscessus biofilms were formed by generating a turbid suspension of the bacteria in HBSS. Turbidity was measured via O.D. using an EPOCH spectrophotometer (Biotex) at 595nm to obtain a concentration of 3 x 108 CFU/mL. SCFM media were prepared as described previously (9, 13) and utilized as a biofilm formation condition in tandem with HBSS biofilm formation. For the biofilms formed in SCFM, bacteria were diluted to obtain 1 x 106 CFU/200 µL and biofilms formed in HBSS were diluted to obtain 1 x 107 CFU/200 µL. Secondary biofilms were established by collecting the supernatant from primary biofilms during the replicative stage (day 2) or non-replicative stage (day 5) of biofilm formation and then placed in fresh SCFM or HBSS. SCFM and HBSS were replaced with fresh media every 24 h so that the supernatants mainly contained released bacteria during biofilm formation. Secondary biofilms were established for 7 and 14 days. The biomass of the primary and secondary biofilms was quantified using the crystal violet assay (14) and absorbance was measured at 550 nm. CFU quantitation for the biofilms was obtained by mechanically disrupting the biofilms via pipetting, followed by serial dilutions and plating on 7H10 agar. Planktonic bacteria at 1 x 105, 1 x 106, and 1 x 107 CFU/mL served as biofilm controls.

Generation of the M. abscessus 19977 mycomarT7 transposon library

The M. abscessus transposon library was generated as described previously (15). MycomarT7 (mmT7) is a temperature-dependent transposon-containing phagemid and was kindly provided by Eric Rubin (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA). MmT7 was propagated and titers were generated using M. smegmatis strain mc2 155 as described previously (15). M. abscessus was grown in 7H9 broth supplemented with 10% OADC and 0.1% Tween-80 at 37°C in a shaking incubator before transduction. Bacteria were then pelleted and washed with MP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM Mg2SO4, 2 mM CaCl2) twice. Washed bacteria were resuspended in MP and buffered and infected with mmT7 at an MOI of 2. The transduction commenced at 37°C for 4 hours with intermittent mixing. Aliquots were plated on 7H10 containing 400 µg/mL kanamycin to obtain individual transposon mutants. A selection of mutants was screened for the presence of mmT7 by amplifying the kanamycin resistance gene with PCR.

Screening the M. abscessus transposon library for deficiency in secondary biofilm formation

The SCFM and HBSS biofilm conditions were screened to identify mutants unable to release bacteria to form secondary biofilms. For the SCFM biofilms, individual mmt7 mutants were selected and cultured in 7H9 broth containing 400 µg/mL kanamycin for 4 days at 37°C in a shaking incubator using a 96-deep-well plate format. After 4 days, bacteria were pelleted and resuspended in HBSS. Fresh SCFM was aliquoted into a flat bottom 96-well plate, and 50 µL of each mutant suspension was added to the plate. Biofilms were formed for 7 days in the dark at 25°C with supernatant replacement after 2 days and then the resulting supernatant was carefully removed to form a secondary biofilm. These secondary biofilms were allowed to form for another 7 days and then the O.D. of the supernatant was measured along with the biomass of the biofilm using the crystal violet assay. Mutants were selected based on diminished secondary biofilm biomass and low O.D. in the corresponding supernatant compared to the wild-type.

For HBSS biofilms, individual mmt7 mutant colonies were added to a 48-well plate containing 7H9 broth media and allowed to grow for 3-4 days. Once mutants had grown to 3 x 108 CFU/mL, 100 µL of the bacteria was placed in 900 µL of HBSS in a fresh 48-well plate to form biofilm for 7 days in the dark at 37°C with supernatant replacement after 2 days. After 7 days, the supernatant was carefully removed without disturbing the transposon mutant biofilm and placed in another fresh well containing HBSS. The supernatant of each of these mutants was allowed to form biofilm for another 7 days, and the O.D. at 595 nm was measured, along with a visual inspection for opaqueness. Wells that matched the O.D. of HBSS alone or had a low O.D. were considered deficient in release or secondary biofilm formation. These mutants were selected for Sanger sequencing using an ABI 3730 capillary sequence machine within the Center for Quantitative Life Sciences (CQLS) at Oregon State University.

Identifying transposon insertion location within M. abscessus mutants

Transposon mutants were reconfirmed in duplicate before sequencing as previously described (9). Briefly, mutants selected from the biofilm detachment screen were sequenced utilizing a previously reported LM-PCR assay with some changes (16). Cells were lysed using 1-mm-diameter glass beads in diH2O via mechanical homogenization. Lysates were centrifuged for 1 minute at 21,000 x g to pellet cell debris. DNA was purified from collected supernatant using a DNA clean and concentrate kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Furthermore, 150 ng of purified DNA was utilized for single digestion with SalI (Thermo fast-digest enzyme) for 30 minutes at 37°C. LM-PCR adapter oligos were generated for SalI (Salgd+Salpt, see Table 1) by adding 45 mM of each oligonucleotide to 1x Taq DNase buffer plus MgCl2 and ligating by decreasing the temperature from 80°C to 4°C over an hour. After digestion, DNA for each mutant was ligated with the adapter oligos using T4 DNase ligase. The ligated product was used as the template in the LM-PCR reaction. The LM-PCR reaction utilized Gold 360 MasterMix (Applied Biosystems) and was performed using 97°C for 7 min, 40 cycles of 97°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min 45 s, and then a final step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were visualized using gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide. The bands of interest were excised and purified using a gel extraction kit (Thermo) and sequencing at the Center for Quantitative Life Sciences (CQLS) at Oregon State University. Sequencing results were blasted in the NCBI against M. abscessus to identify disrupted genes.

Table 1.

Primers used in the PCR, LM-PCR, and complementation assays.

Primer Sequence (5’ to 3’)
Saldg (for both adapters) TAGCTTATTCCTCAAGGCACGAGC
Salpt (for SalI adapter) TCGAGCTCGTGC
pSalg R (for LMPCR reaction) GCTTATTCCTCAAGGCACGA
pMyco F1 (for LMPCR reaction) CCGGGGACTTATCAGCCAAC
pMyco F2 (for LMPCR reaction) ACCCGTGATATTGCTGAAGAG
MAB_4706ccompF AAAAAAtctagaGCCACAATCCGAAATTTGTT
MAB_4706ccompR TTTTTTaagcttTTTGGGCGACTAGGAAGCTA
Kan F ATGACTGGGCACAACAGAC
Kan R TCGTCAAGAAGGCGATAGA

Complementation of M. abscessus mutant MAB_4706c

The MAB_4706c gene with native promoters was complemented by the use of the integrative pMV306 plasmid as previously described (17) with some changes. First, an apramycin-resistance gene was cloned into pMV306 to generate the pMV306-Apr plasmid. Genes were cloned into pMV306-Apr using primers designed for these specific regions. This product was then transformed into electrocompetent DH10β E. coli and grown on LB containing 400 µg/mL kanamycin and apramycin. Positive colonies were used for colony PCR to confirm apramycin resistance and gene of interest ligation. These constructs were extracted using a Qiagen Mini Prep kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Electrocompetent M. abscessus mutant cells were prepared by washing plate-grown bacteria four times via centrifugation at 2000 x g at 4°C for 10 minutes in an ice-cold 10% glycerol and 0.1% Tween-80 solution. Cells were stored at -80°C in 10% glycerol until use. Plasmids were electroporated into M. abscessus competent cells using a 0.2cm cuvette (BioRad) at 2500 V, 1000Ω, and 25µF. Bacteria were recovered in 7H9 for 2 to 3 hours and plated onto 7H10 containing 400 µg/mL of kanamycin and apramycin and positive colonies were screened via PCR as described above.

Addition of monocytes to M. abscessus biofilms

Biofilms were established for 7 days in either HBSS or SCFM as described above. THP-1 monocytes were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of IFN-γ for 24 h prior to biofilm contact. After biofilm maturation, supernatants were removed and replaced with stimulated THP-1 monocytes (1x105 cells/well) in RPMI media. The biofilms were mechanically lysed at days 1, 2, and 3 post THP-1 addition to determine macrophage activity against these biofilms as quantified by CFUs. Activated THP-1 cells were also added during the replicative stage and non-replicative stage of biofilm formation by replacing supernatants with RMPI media followed by CFU determination at days 1 and 3 post contact with monocytes via serial dilution.

Infection and binding of host cells with M. abscessus biofilm phenotypes

THP-1 cells were seeded at 3 x 105 cells/500 µL of RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS containing 50 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and incubated at 37°C. After 24 hours, PMA was removed and replaced with fresh complete media and incubated overnight at 37°C. Biofilms were formed as previously described in either HBSS or SCFM. At day 7, the biofilms were disrupted to release bacteria and then THP-1 macrophages were infected with primary biofilm or secondary biofilm bacteria for 1 hour, including a 10-min synchronization step at 150 x g. To kill extracellular bacteria, 200 µg/mL of amikacin was added to the monolayers for 2 hours. Cells were lysed post antibiotic treatment, at 24 hours, and 72 hours post infection. Lysates were serial diluted and plated on 7H10 agar for intracellular CFU quantification.

HEp-2 cells were seeded with DMEM media containing 10% FBS and allowed to achieve 90% confluency. Cells were then overlayed with ice-cold culture medium containing 106 CFU/mL bacteria to prevent internalization of bacteria by the epithelial cells. Wild-type M. abscessus 19977, secondary biofilm mutants, and a complemented strain were utilized for infection. The M. abscessus strains were allowed to bind to epithelial cells for 30 min at 4°C. Monolayers were then washed with ice-cold HBSS twice and lysed with 0.01% TritonX-100 and serially diluted on 7H10 agar for CFU determination.

Isolation of bacterial surface proteins and proteomic identification

To isolate surface proteins from bacteria, we utilized biotinylation followed by streptavidin-bound magnetic bead purification. We compared planktonic bacteria, bacteria with the biofilm phenotype in HBSS (7-day biofilm), bacteria that formed secondary biofilms in HBSS, and bacteria that formed secondary biofilms in SCFM. First, bacteria cells were washed twice with HBSS. After the 2nd wash, bacteria pellets were resuspended in 1 mg Sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin (Thermo Scientific) reconstituted in 1mL HBSS and then incubated for 30 min at 4°C with gentle rotation. Leftover biotin reagent was quenched with 10 mM glycine in HBSS for 10 min at room temperature under gentle rotation. Bacteria cells were washed twice with 1mL HBSS. After washing, the pellets were resuspended with GLIB buffer (10 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.1% tween-20, 6 M guanidinium HCl in PBS, pH 7.2) and then transferred to a 2 mL bead-beating tube with <0.1 mm glass beads.

Bacteria samples were lysed using an Omni Bead Ruptor (Omni Intl.) set to speed 4 with three cycles of 30 s between each cycle samples and were placed on ice to prevent degradation. To clear, the lysate samples were centrifuged for 1 min at room temperature at 21,000 x g. The supernatant was collected and passed through a 0.2 µm syringe filter to remove DNA and any large debris from the protein extract. The supernatant was transferred to a 2 mL protein lo-bind (Eppendorf) tube. Streptavidin Dynabeads (Thermo Scientific) were added to the extract and incubated for 1 hour in a rotary shaker at room temperature. The protein mixture was transferred into a µMacs magnetic column (Miltenyi Biotec). The beads were washed twice with GLIB buffer with an incubation step in between for 5 mins on a rotary shaker. After second GLIB wash, the beads were washed twice with PBS (0.05% tween-20 in PBS, pH 7.2) in a new clean tube with an incubation of 30 min on a rotary shaker at room temperature. Beads containing surface proteins were eluted in resuspension buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA in H2O) and then incubated at 65°C for 10 min to denature proteins from the beads for mass spectrometry.

To reduce the disulfide bonds of the proteins, the samples were incubated at 56°C for 1 hour with 5 mM dithiothreitol (ThermoFisher). The samples were then incubated with 10 mM iodoacetamide (MilliPore Sigma) for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark in order to carbamidomethylate the cysteine residues. The samples were digested overnight at 37°C using Trypsin Gold (Mass Spectrometry Grade, Promega). After digestion, the samples were spun down at 12,000 x g for 30 s to collect the condensate, and the digestion was stopped by the addition of 0.5% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid. The samples were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 minutes and then transferred to LC vials.

A Waters nanoAcquityTM UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) was coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were loaded onto a trap 2G nanoAcquity UPLC Trap Column (180um, 50mm, 5um) at a flow rate of 5 μL/min for 5 min. The results were obtained on a commercially available Acquity UPLC Peptide BEH C18 column (100um, 100mm, 1.7um). The column temperature was maintained at 37°C using the integrated column heater. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in LC-MS grade water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in LC-MS grade acetonitrile. The separation was performed at a flow rate of 0.5 μL/min, and using linear gradients of 3% to 10% B for 10 min, 10% to 30% B for 10 min, 30% to 70% B for 5 min, 70% to 95% B for 3 min, 95% to 3% B for 4 min, and 95% to 3% B for 3 min. Total method length was 35 min. The outlet of the column was connected to a Thermo Nanospray Flex ion source and +2300V were applied to the needle.

MS1 spectra were acquired at a resolution of 120,000 (at m/z 200) in the Orbitrap using a maximum IT of 50 ms and an automatic gain control (AGC) target value of 2E5. For MS2 spectra, up to 10 peptide precursors were isolated for fragmentation (isolation width of 1.6 Th, maximum IT of 10 ms, and AGC value of 2e4). Precursors were fragmented by HCD using 30% normalized collision energy (NCE) and analyzed in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 30,000. The dynamic exclusion duration of fragmented precursor ions was set to 30 s. Raw files were processed in Thermo Proteome Discoverer 2.3. Precursor ion mass tolerance was set to 5 ppm, while fragment ion mass tolerance was 0.02 Da. The SequestHT search engine was used to search against the Swissprot human and M. abscessus protein database. Only b and y ions were considered for peptide spectrum matching. MS1 precursor quantification was used for label-free quantitation of the peptides. Protein abundances were calculated as the sum of the abundances of unique peptides detected.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software. The comparisons between the treatment groups were analyzed using either t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons where appropriate. Specific statistical tests are named in the figure legends in which they were used. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

M. abscessus is able to form secondary biofilms

A key aspect of the biofilm formation cycle is the bacteria’s ability to detach from the biofilm and establish a secondary or satellite biofilm. Growing evidence has been mounting of patient-to-patient transmission in hosts that have cystic fibrosis, but more information is needed to ascertain this infectious phenotype of M. abscessus. Previous work in our lab showed that M. abscessus can form robust biofilms in synthetic cystic fibrosis media (SCFM), and specifically that the colony forming units (CFUs) of the biofilm do not increase after day 4, while the matrix biomass continues to increase over time (9). Based on this, the capability of bacteria released from replicative stage biofilms and non-replicative stage biofilms to re-form biofilms was investigated. Supernatants of bacteria forming biofilms were carefully removed from wells on day 2 (replicative stage) and day 5 (non-replicative stage) and utilized to form biofilms. These secondary biofilms were developed in either a 1:1 ratio of supernatant to fresh media or unaltered transferred supernatant ( Figure 1 ). Secondary biofilms were established for 7 and 14 days in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) or SCFM. The biomass was determined at both time points, and matched primary biofilms of wild-type bacteria were included under SCFM and HBSS formation conditions. Released bacteria from both the replicative stage ( Figures 1A, B ) and non-replicative stage biofilms ( Figures 1C, D ) were able to form secondary biofilms, especially when introduced to fresh media. The biomass of the SCFM biofilms formed with non-replicative stage bacteria matched the biomass of wild-type bacteria when added into fresh SCFM at both time points ( Figures 1C, D ). The biomass of the secondary biofilms transferred without fresh media remained significantly lower than the control groups in all conditions. There did not appear to be differences in the biomass of secondary biofilms formed by released bacteria in HBSS compared to wild-type bacteria except at day 14 for the replicative stage supernatants and day 7 for the non-replicative stage supernatants compared to the 107 bacteria control ( Figures 1B, C , respectively).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

M. abscessus bacteria released from primary biofilms are capable of establishing secondary biofilms. M. abscessus bacteria released from replicative stage biofilms and non-replicative stage biofilms were utilized to reform secondary biofilms in both HBSS and SCFM conditions. Biomass was measured for replicative stage secondary biofilms at days 7 (A) and 14 (B). Biomass was measured for non-replicative stage secondary biofilms at days 7 (C) and 14 (D) via crystal violet assay. BF, biofilm. The error bars represent the SEM of three biological replicates. Statistical analysis was conducted using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with a Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test; *** indicates p < 0.0001, ** indicates p < 0.001, * indicates p < 0.05.

Next, assays were performed to determine whether the replicative stage biofilm-released bacteria had any advantage in establishing secondary biofilms more quickly than the wild-type bacteria in SCFM conditions. For CFU determination, both the disrupted biofilms and released biofilms into the supernatant were enumerated. Similarly, the replicative stage released bacteria were placed in either a 1:1 ratio of supernatant to fresh SCFM media or unaltered transferred supernatant and the biomass and CFUs were measured at days 2, 5, and 7 during biofilm formation ( Figure 2 ). As seen previously, all the conditions established more robust biomass by day 5, with day 7 staining showing the highest biomass [ Figure 2A (9)]. Unaltered supernatants were significantly increased by day 2; however, by days 5 and 7, the secondary biofilm biomass was less than the primary wild-type biofilms ( Figure 2A ). The secondary biofilms, when given fresh media, had similar biomass accumulation to the wild-type. The CFU/well was obtained for the bacteria in the biofilm or detached phenotypes ( Figure 2B ). Bacteria replication (CFU/mL) in the secondary biofilm conditions increased on day 2 but plateaued by day 5 whereas the supernatant phenotypes dropped on day 2 but then increased by day 5, suggesting the bacteria were switching to biofilm-formation phenotypes between days 0 and 2 but increased biomass formation at later time points. Taken together, M. abscessus is able to release bacteria from biofilms, and these bacteria can form secondary biofilms similar to those formed by the wild-type.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Secondary biofilms were established similarly to wild-type M. abscessus primary biofilms in SCFM. The replicative stage supernatants of SCFM primary biofilms were used to form secondary biofilms. The biomass was determined for the primary biofilm, unaltered supernatant forming a secondary biofilm, and a 1:1 ratio of supernatant with fresh SCFM forming a secondary biofilm (A). The CFU/well was determined for both the biofilm and released bacteria in the supernatant (B). For both assays, the timepoints were measured at days 2, 5, and 7 of the formation process. BF, biofilm. The error bars represent the SEM of two biological replicates. Statistical analysis was conducted using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with a Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test; ** indicates p < 0.001, * indicates p < 0.05.

Comparison between M. abscessus 19977 with other M. abscessus strains isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis

To verify whether the results obtained were only observed with the M. abscessus 19977 strain or were also seen with other strains isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis, the ability of the strain M. abscessus 00103 and M. abscessus 01715 were evaluated in comparison with the strain M. abscessus 19977 regarding the efficiency to form a new biofilm once it detaches from an existing biofilm. The results shown in Table 2 suggest that all three strains behaved similarly and that detaching from a biofilm is a more efficient manner to establish a new biofilm than when bacteria were obtained from an agar plate.

Table 2.

Ability of the strains of M. abscessus to form new biofilms after detachment.

Bacterial strains1 Biofilm mass2
From plate Day 2 Day 5 Day 7
19977 0.313 + 0.021 0.718 + 0.052 0.751 + 0.037
MAB 00103 0.202 + 0.047 0.722 + 0.039 0.756 + 0.026
MAB 01715 0.250 + 0.033 0.704 + 0.055 0.743 + 0.021
Satellite
19977 0.323 + 0016 0.857 + 0.066 0.895 + 0.049
MAB 00103 0.303 + 0.029 0.894 + 0.034 0.884 + 0.037
MAB 01715 0.309 + 0.026 0.862 + 0.023 0.865 + 0.042

(1) M. abscessus strains 19977 (wildtype), 00103 (CF patient), and 01715 (CF patient).

(2) All statistical comparisons between strains and conditions tested were p > 0.05.

Genes identified to play a role in bacterial release from biofilms

To better understand the mechanisms underpinning the release of M. abscessus from primary biofilms, an mmt7 transposon library was screened for mutant clones that do not release from primary biofilms in both HBSS and SCFM conditions. The mutants in this system were defined as being unable to establish a secondary biofilm. A supernatant containing released bacteria was utilized to form another biofilm, and each clone’s secondary biofilm was compared to that of the wild-type. In SCFM conditions, eight mutants were identified via ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR) and sequencing identified transposon insertion ( Table 3 ). The transposon was inserted directly into two genes encoding hypothetical proteins [MAB_0274c (GXWXG domain), MAB_1222], although probable neighboring genes were affected if in an operon. Three membrane proteins [MAB_4706c (membrane-associated oxidoreductase complex, DoxX), MAB_2480 (Transmembrane), MAB_2301 (MmpL lipoprotein), MAB_0525c (LpqG lipoprotein)]. A chaperonin [MAB_0650 (GroEL)] and an enzyme [MAB_1277 (glycosyltransferase, modifies lipopolysaccharide]. In HBSS conditions, 15 mutants were selected and sequenced ( Table 4 ). The transposon inserted into two tRNA’s (MAB_0275 and MAB_t5030c), along with two lipoproteins [MAB_3785c (LppF), MAB_0307c] and a translation elongation factor [MAB_1310 (BipA)]. Two genes encoded oxidoreductases [MAB_2438 (molybdopterin) and MAB_4628c]. One gene was a monooxygenase enzyme (MAB_4050c). A chaperonin [MAB_0650 (GroEL)] and a probable carbon starvation protein [MAB_1260c (CstA)] were also found. Two genes had domains suggesting kinase activity [MAB_3538 (DAGKc-domain) and MAB_1507 (hypothetical protein)]. An alkyl mercury lyase (MAB_4789c), a membrane protein [MAB_1170 (transports anions)], and transcriptional regulator (MAB_2089) were found. Further characterization is needed to understand the role these genes play in bacterial release from biofilms.

Table 3.

Genes identified as deficient in releasing bacteria from SCFM biofilms.

Gene Disrupted Probable Operon Protein Function GC content (%)
MAB_4706c MAB_4710c Transcriptional regulator, TetR family DNA binding 67.9
MAB_4709c Transcriptional regulator, AraC family DNA binding/response to environmental stimuli 62.4
MAB_4708c Glyoxalase/bleomycin resistance protein Metalloenzymes 62.8
MAB_4707c Lipase Lipid catabolic process 65.6
MAB_4706c DoxX family protein Membrane-associated oxidoreductase complex (MRC) 60.5
MAB_4705c Probable membrane protein, MmpS Membrane protein, biosynthesis and secretion of siderophores 61.3
MAB_4704c Probable membrane protein, MmpL MMPL family, lipid transport 58.6
MAB_4703c Probable membrane protein, MmpL MMPL family, lipid transport 59.6
MAB_4702c Low molecular weight t-cell antigen tb8.4 Binds free heme in mycobacterial cytoplasm and then delivers to the membrane 61
MAB_2480 MAB_2480 Transmembrane protein 66.7
MAB_2481 Integral membrane transporter Major Facilitator Superfamily; Sugar (and other) transporter 65.6
MAB_2482 Possible monooxygenase Luciferase-like monooxygenase 63.4
between MAB_2301 MAB_2302 MAB_2300 Membrane protein, MmpS Membrane protein, biosynthesis and secretion of siderophores 59.5
MAB_2301 Membrane protein, mmpL MMPL family, lipid transport 60.7
MAB_2302 Probable conserved membrane protein, MmpS Membrane protein, biosynthesis and secretion of siderophores 55.6
MAB_2303 Membrane protein, MmpL MMPL family, lipid transport 59.5
MAB_0274c MAB_0274c Conserved hypothetical protein GXWXG protein 61.6
MAB_0273c Hypothetical Protein 64.3
MAB_0650 MAB_0650 60 kDa chaperonin 2 (Protein Cpn60 2) (GroEL) TCP-1/cpn60 chaperonin family, ATP binding 66.3
MAB_0525c MAB_0529c Coenzyme Q (Ubiquinone) biosynthesis protein Coq4 Coenzyme Q (ubiquinone) biosynthetic pathway 62.8
MAB_0528c Probable epoxide hydrolase EphA Catalytic activity 64.7
MAB_0527c Possible monooxygenase (Luciferase-like) Flavin monooxygenase 62.6
MAB_0526c Hypothetical zinc-type alcohol dehydrogenase Oxidoreductase activity 62.6
MAB_0525c Probable conserved lipoprotein LpqG 26 kDa periplasmic immunogenic proteins 66.7
MAB_0524c Probable conserved lipoprotein LpqG 26 kDa periplasmic immunogenic proteins 69
MAB_1277 MAB_1277 Glycosyltransferase RgtA/B/C/D-like domain Modification of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inner core 66.2
MAB_1278 O-acyltransferase WSD1-like N-terminal domain Wax ester synthase-like Acyl-CoA acyltransferase domain 67.7
MAB_1279 Probable 3-demethylubiquinone-9 3-methyltransferase 61.4
MAB_1222 MAB_1218 Probable aldehyde dehydrogenase AldA Oxidizes a wide variety of aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes 65.1
MAB_1219 Probable short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase NAD- or NADP-dependent oxidoreductases 62.8
MAB_1220 Probable dehydrogenase/reductase Oxidoreductase activity 66.3
MAB_1221 Possible 4-carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase Degradation of aromatic compounds 58.7
MAB_1222 Conserved hypothetical protein 62
MAB_1223 Probable carboxylesterase (LipT) Carboxylesterase family, active site serine 63.1
MAB_1224 Conserved hypothetical protein 62.8
MAB_1225 ABC transporter, permease protein Transport of various osmoprotectants and nutrients 62
MAB_1226 ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein ABC transporter 61.4
MAB_1227 ABC transporter, permease protein Transport of various osmoprotectants and nutrients 67.3
MAB_1228 ABC transporter, Glycine betaine Transport system involved in bacterial osmoregulation 62.1
MAB_1229 Transmembrane protein 66

Table 4.

Genes identified as deficient in releasing bacteria from HBSS biofilms.

Gene Disrupted Probable Operon Protein Function GC content (%)
MAB_1260c MAB_1260c Probable carbon starvation protein (CstA) Uptake and utilization of peptides, during carbon starvation 66
MAB_1259c Hypothetical Protein Selenoprotein 65
MAB_1258c Hypothetical Protein (Transmembrane protein) 69
In between MAB_t5030c MAB_2089 MAB_2088 Transposase-like protein DNA binding, transposition of insertion sequences 65.5
MAB_2087 Transposase-like protein IS3/IS911 DNA binding 61.4
MAB_t5030c MAB_t5030c 63.8
MAB_2089 Transcriptional regulator DNA binding 65.5
MAB_2090 Nucleotidyl transferase AbiEii/AbiGii toxin family protein Type IV TA system, protects from phage infection 65.2
MAB_2091 PNPLA domain-containing protein Lipase and transacylase properties, roles in lipid and energy homeostasis 65
MAB_2092 Nucleotidyltransferase Second Messenger Oligonucleotide or Dinucleotide Synthetase domain 59.4
MAB_2093 UBA/THIF-type NAD/FAD-binding fold Ubiquitin E1-like enzymes that contain the NAD/FAD-binding fold 63.6
MAB_2094 Hypothetical protein 58.4
MAB_2095 Metal-dependent phosphohydrolase, HD subdomain Phosphohydrolase activity 66.7
MAB_3785c MAB_3786c Uncharacterized protein 66
MAB_3785c Probable conserved lipoprotein LppF Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase 66.8
MAB_3784c Preprotein translocase secY subunit Preprotein translocase pathway 62.2
MAB_3783c Adenylate kinase Catalyzes the reversible transfer of MgATP to AMP 66.7
MAB_3782c Methionine aminopeptidase Map 66.9
MAB_4789c MAB_4789c Alkylmercury lyase Detoxify mercurial compounds 62.3
MAB_4788c Mycothiol-dependent maleylpyruvate isomerase metal-binding Metal-ion binding 65.2
MAB_4787c Hypothetical regulatory protein, TetR family Controls the expression of MmpL lipid transporters 65.6
MAB_4786c Hypothetical protein (small) 63.3
MAB_2438 MAB_2438 Probable oxidoreductase Molybdopterin oxidoreductase 64.6
MAB_2439 Fluoride-specific ion channel FluC Efflux transporter which confers resistance to fluoride ion 68.2
MAB_2440 Fluoride-specific ion channel FluC Efflux transporter which confers resistance to fluoride ion 63.2
MAB_2441 UspA domain-containing protein Provides a general “stress endurance” activity 62.4
MAB_1310 MAB_1310 Large ribosomal subunit assembly factor BipA 50S ribosomal subunit assembly protein 66.6
MAB_1311 VOC domain-containing protein Glyoxalase-like domain 64.8
MAB_1312 Beta-lactamase-like Alkyl sulfatase dimerization 63.1
MAB_1313 Probable transcriptional regulator, AraC family DNA binding 60
MAB_1314 Mesocentin 67.2
MAB_1315 Putative lipoprotein LpqW Active transport of solutes 68.2
MAB_1316 MshB Mycothiol biosynthesis protein MshB 66.8
MAB_1317 Integral membrane protein 64.7
MAB_0650 MAB_0650 60 kDa chaperonin 2 (Protein Cpn60 2) (GroEL) TCP-1/cpn60 chaperonin family, ATP binding 66.3
MAB_3538 MAB_3538 DAGKc domain-containing protein Kinase activity 67.3
MAB_3539 Transcriptional regulator WhiB 67.1
MAB_4050c MAB_4059c Transcriptional regulator/sugar kinase Transcriptional repressors, sugar kinases 67.8
MAB_4058c SRPBCC family protein Polyketide synthesis 62.8
MAB_4057c D-inositol 3-phosphate glycosyltransferase Glycosyltransferase of mycothiol biosynthesis 66.8
MAB_4056c YbjN domain-containing protein 62.7
MAB_4055c Acyl-CoA synthetase AMP binding 64.6
MAB_4054c Pyridoxamine 5’-phosphate oxidase putative domain-containing protein de novo biosynthesis of PLP 59.5
MAB_4053c Short chain dehydrogenase/reductase NAD- or NADP-dependent oxidoreductases 67.3
MAB_4052c Lipase/esterase 67.5
MAB_4051c Reductase Ferritin-like superfamily 60.3
MAB_4050c Probable monooxygenase FAD, NAD binding 65.1
MAB_4049c 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase Catalytic activity 64.2
MAB_4048c Sensor-like histidine kinase senX3 OmpR family 65.9
MAB_4047c Sensory transduction protein RegX3 OmpR family 64.5
MAB_4046c Putative transcriptional regulator, TetR family DNA binding 63.4
MAB_4045c Probable ATP-binding protein ABC transporter Biosynthesis of coenzyme Q 64
MAB_4044c Putative hydrolase/esterase/lipase 65.8
MAB_4043c Probable short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase NAD- or NADP-dependent oxidoreductases 65.2
MAB_4042c Probable monooxygenase Oxidoreductase activity 61.5
MAB_4041c Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport Polyketide synthesis 64.2
MAB_4040c Conserved Hypothetical Protein 61.3
MAB_4039c Probable monooxygenase Oxidoreductase activity 62.5
MAB_4038c Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport Polyketide synthesis 65.9
MAB_0275 MAB_0275 Queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase (TGT) 65.4
MAB_0276 Probable cytochrome P450 Superfamily of heme-containing mono-oxygenases 63.1
MAB_0307c MAB_0306c Lipoprotein 64.2
MAB_0307c Lipoprotein 60.7
MAB_0308c Lipoprotein LpqN 63.2
MAB_1507 MAB_1507 Conserved hypothetical protein Kinase activity 62.7
MAB_1170 MAB_1170 Probable membrane transporter protein TauE, transport of anions across the cytoplasmic membrane 67.8
MAB_1169 Hydrolase, alpha/beta fold 65.3
MAB_1168 Exopolyphosphatase Sugar kinase/actin/hsp70 superfamily 67.5
MAB_1167 Septum formation initiator subfamily protein 67.9
MAB_1166 Septum formation initiator 71.7
MAB_1165 Enolase 66.9
MAB_1164 Conserved lipoprotein LpqU Lysozyme-like domain superfamily 68.1
MAB_4628c MAB_4628c Luciferase-like monooxygenase Oxidoreductase activity 63.4

Released M. abscessus are able to bind and invade epithelial cells

M. abscessus lung infections are associated with biofilms, however, the infection likely originates with bacteria released from a biofilm in an environmental setting or from another patient. The bacteria encounter the lung epithelium and must be able to invade or establish a niche to form biofilms (12). The ability of M. abscessus to bind to respiratory epithelial cells was assayed by utilizing the wild-type M. abscessus 19977 and secondary biofilm mutants from the previous section ( Figure 3 ). Unfortunately, no secondary biofilm mutants from SCFM demonstrated a significant reduction in binding epithelial capacity compared to the wild-type ( Figure 3A ). Six HBSS secondary biofilm mutants had significantly inhibited binding compared to wild-type M. abscessus 19977 ( Figure 3B ). Three of these binding deficient mutants are hypothetical proteins [MAB_1170 (membrane transporter for anions), MAB_4789c (Alky mercury lyase in an operon with TetR gene for regulating MmpL transporters), and MAB_1507 (conserved hypothetical protein with kinase activity)]. The observation of kinases and more transporter regulation are also key factors in the binding to epithelial cells and not just for the release from biofilms. Other mutants may encode enzymes or signals that are involved in the interaction with epithelial cells. Next, released bacteria from both the SCFM and HBSS biofilms were collected 7 days after formation and utilized to infect epithelial cells. The bacteria released from the biofilms, whether formed in HBSS or SCFM, significantly increased the invasion of epithelial cells compared to planktonic M. abscessus after 1 hour of infection ( Figure 4 ). This finding further supports the hypothesis that the released bacteria phenotype from established biofilms is an adaptation suited not only for reforming biofilms but also establishing an infection in the lungs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

M. abscessus secondary biofilm mutants were deficient in binding the host epithelium. Wild-type and secondary biofilm deficient mutants identified in SCFM (A) or HBSS (B) media were incubated with HEp-2 epithelial cells at 4°C for 30 min. CFUs were recovered from epithelial cells. The error bars represent the SEM of 3 experiments. Statistical analysis was conducted using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with a Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test. All mutants were compared to the wild-type; * indicates p < 0.05.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

M. abscessus bacteria released from biofilms are more efficient at invading the epithelial cells. HEp-2 cells were infected with either planktonic M. abscessus or bacteria released from biofilms after 7 days in either HBSS or SCFM. The error bars represent SEM from three experiments. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann–Whitney t-test; * indicates p < 0.05.

Complementation of MAB_4706c restores the binding and secondary biofilm formation phenotype

MAB_4706c was cloned into pMV306 containing an apramycin-resistance gene and transformed into electrocompetent mutant MAB_4706c cells. Complemented MAB_4706c (ΔMAB_4706c) was tested against wild-type and mutant cells in its ability to form satellite biofilms and bind to epithelial cells ( Figure 5 ). Secondary biofilms were formed in SCFM with wild-type, mutant 4706c, and ΔMAB_4706c, and absorbance readings were taken after 7 days ( Figure 5A ). ΔMAB_4706c had a similar optical density (O.D.) to wild-type M. abscessus 19977, while mutant 4706c biofilms had significantly decreased absorbance readings, suggesting complementation restores the bacteria’s ability to disperse from primary biofilms. The epithelial binding assay was repeated using the wild-type, mutant, and complemented bacteria ( Figure 5B ). ΔMAB_4706c had a similar binding capability to wild-type M. abscessus 19977, also restoring this phenotype. Taken together, the genes in the MAB_4706c operon play a major role in M. abscessus biofilm release and secondary attachment to the respiratory epithelium. MAB_4706c and MAB_4702c are both hypothetical proteins, while 4705c, 4704c, and 4703c are all membrane proteins in the MmpL family.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Complementation of MAB_4706c restores the wild-type phenotype. The ability of the bacteria to form secondary biofilms and bind to epithelial cells was determined. Wild-type M. abscessus 19977, mutant 4706c, and complemented MAB_4706c (ΔMAB_4706c) were utilized to form secondary biofilms (A) and assayed for epithelial binding (B). Data are representative of three biological replicates. Statistical analysis was conducted using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with a Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test; **** indicates p < 0.0001, * indicates p < 0.05.

Primary biofilm and secondary biofilm formation phenotypes of M. abscessus are able to invade macrophages and evade killing mechanisms

Macrophages are the first immune cells that bacteria encounter in the lung environment, whether they are circulating airway macrophages or tissue macrophages after penetrating the epithelial layer. Mycobacteria are obligate intracellular pathogens and can disseminate the infection by infecting secondary macrophages in a transitionary manner. The ability of the bacteria collected from primary biofilms and those of released bacteria to form secondary biofilms means they are able to invade and replicate in macrophages ( Figure 6 ). Disrupted primary biofilm bacteria were more efficient at invading macrophage monolayers compared to planktonic bacteria ( Figure 6A ). Both released bacteria and disrupted biofilm phenotypes were able to grow by day 3 within the macrophages ( Figures 6B, D ). Bacteria released from secondary biofilms had a similar uptake to plate bacteria but may not necessarily confer an advantage ( Figure 6C ). Overall, M. abscessus released from biofilms or in the biofilm phenotype were able to invade and grow intracellularly, regardless of whether the biofilms were made in SCFM or HBSS.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Macrophages ingest M. abscessus biofilm phenotypes more efficiently than planktonic bacteria. Bacteria from primary biofilms (A, B) or bacteria from secondary biofilms (C, D) were used to infect THP-1 macrophages. The invasion percentage (A, C) was determined after a 1-hour infection and surviving intracellular CFUs were obtained at days 0,1, and 3 (B, D) post-infection. Data are representative of two biological replicates. Statistical analysis was conducted using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with a Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test (A, C) and 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B, D); **** indicates p < 0.0001, *** indicates p < 0.001, ** indicates p < 0.01, * indicates p < 0.05.

Next, IFN-γ-stimulated monocytes were added to mature biofilms in both SCFM and HBSS to determine whether the cells could eliminate biofilm CFUs ( Figure 7 ). Monocytes did not decrease any of the biofilm CFUs at all time points: 24, 48, and 72 hours post addition ( Figure 7A ). Planktonic bacteria were significantly reduced by monocytes compared to the bacteria protected by biofilms. THP-1 monocytes were also added during the biofilm formation process in replicative stage biofilm (day 2) and non-replicative stage biofilm (day 5) ( Figures 7B, C , respectively). The addition of phagocytic cells to biofilms did not contribute to a decrease in biofilm CFUs during the replication stage. However, during the stationary phase, biofilms established in HBSS were significantly reduced by day 3 compared to the HBSS or SCFM biofilm control. As before, the planktonic bacteria control had a significant reduction in CFUs compared to its biofilm counterparts. Taken together, bacteria released from biofilms or in the biofilm phenotype are able to combat macrophage killing but only confer an advantage if formed in SCFM and during the non-replicative stage of formation.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Monocytes were unable to kill M. abscessus biofilms. IFN-γ-stimulated monocytes were added to mature (7 day) biofilms formed in either SCFM or HBSS (A). Monocytes were also added to replicative stage biofilms (B) and non-replicative stage biofilms (C). The biofilms were disrupted and CFUs were determined at days 1, 2, or 3 post cell addition for biofilm survival. Planktonic bacteria served as a macrophage killing control. Data are representative of three biological replicates. Statistical analysis was conducted using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. **** indicates p < 0.0001, *** indicates p < 0.001, ** indicates p < 0.01.

Bacterial surface proteins

The release of bacteria from biofilms may express a set of different proteins on the surface that then make them more capable of seeding and infecting different sites or hosts. We compared planktonic bacteria grown in 7H10 agar, bacteria with the biofilm phenotype (7 days biofilm), bacteria released from biofilm when in Middlebrook 7H9 broth, and bacteria released from biofilm in SCFM. The results, shown in a Venn diagram, demonstrated that bacteria released from biofilm expressed significantly more proteins than bacteria grown in plates ( Figure 8 ). The bacteria found in biofilms accounted for 295 of the 380 proteins detected and are summarized in Tables 5 15 . Planktonic bacteria accounted for 85 of the 380 proteins and are summarized in Tables 5 , 6 , 8 , 15 and all the listed proteins overlapped with the other treatment groups examined. The bacteria released from biofilms expressed more proteins on their surface, suggesting a remarkable change in phenotype. It is notable that many of the proteins were different lipoproteins, of a small size, and uncharacterized, and there were many types of enzymes. We compared the transposon mutants that were found deficient in secondary biofilm formation to the surface proteins detected. Three mutants, MAB_0525c (all treatments), MAB_2301 [planktonic, secondary BF (7H9), secondary BF (SCFM), and primary BF (7H9)], and MAB_3538 [secondary BF (7H9) and secondary BF (SCFM)] were found in the proteomic lists. Interestingly, the latter mutant, MAB_3538, with kinase activity, was only found in the released biofilm groupings.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

A Venn diagram depicting proteins determined through proteomic analysis. Each treatment group’s list of proteins was compared to each other to resolve overlaps. Graphical representation of Tables 1 , 5 14 . https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/.

Table 5.

Surface proteins unique to planktonic bacteria, primary biofilm (BF) (7H9), and secondary BF (7H9).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MFZ3 NLPC_P60 domain-containing protein 450 44.3 MAB_3664

Table 15.

Surface proteins shared across all treatment groups.

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MLV9 ATP synthase subunit b-delta 448 47.6 MAB_1450
2 B1MLW0 ATP synthase subunit alpha 548 58.8 MAB_1451
3 B1MLW3 ATP synthase epsilon chain 121 13.1 MAB_1454
4 B1ME62 Cell wall synthesis protein CwsA 134 13.6 MAB_0024c
5 B1MAP3 Conserved hypothetical membrane protein 521 54.6 MAB_2233c
6 B1MN13 Elongation factor 4 617 68 MAB_1640
7 B1MLW1 ATP synthase gamma chain 308 33.1 MAB_1452
8 B1ME71 Probable serine/threonine-protein kinase PknB 628 67 MAB_0033c
9 B1MH53 Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase proenzyme 237 25 MAB_0639c
10 B1MLW2 ATP synthase subunit beta 476 51.7 MAB_1453
11 B1MG88 Uncharacterized protein (Type VII secretion protein EccB) 493 52 MAB_3759c
12 B1MDJ8 Signal recognition particle receptor FtsY 458 47.8 MAB_3241c
13 B1MF49 Protein translocase subunit SecA 929 103.9 MAB_3580c
14 B1MEY4 Possible transmembrane cation transporter 361 38.6 MAB_3514c
15 B1MF02 Uncharacterized protein 406 42.8 MAB_3532
16 B1MM29 Putative membrane protein, MmpL 965 104.2 MAB_4746
17 B1MB81 PknH_C domain-containing protein 251 26.5 MAB_2421c
18 B1MG27 Putative ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 861 91.1 MAB_3698
19 B1MEL4 Hypothetical cutinase 336 35.7 MAB_0178
20 B1MNZ2 Probable cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 349 38.7 MAB_1961
21 B1MCB4 Lipoprotein LprG (27 kDa lipoprotein) 225 23.2 MAB_2806
22 B1MDM6 Thioredoxin-like_fold domain-containing protein 257 27.9 MAB_3269c
23 B1MG04 Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit 588 64.8 MAB_3675
24 B1MK36 Uncharacterized protein 393 42.8 MAB_4474
25 B1MC26 PHB domain-containing protein 380 41.1 MAB_2718c
26 B1MAP2 Putative FtsK/SpoIIIE family protein 1343 146.7 MAB_2232c
27 B1MN79 TPM_phosphatase domain-containing protein 671 70.8 MAB_1706c
28 B1MLM3 Probable serine protease HtrA 492 50.6 MAB_1364
29 B1MEE1 Probable oxidoreductase 412 45.3 MAB_0105c
30 B1MMI4 Penicillin-binding protein 793 83.2 MAB_4901c
31 B1MJY5 Putative succinate dehydrogenase, flavoprotein subunit 641 70.1 MAB_4422
32 B1MEL6 Polyketide synthase PKS13 1782 189.7 MAB_0180
33 B1MAM2 Probable polyketide synthase 2121 226.9 MAB_2212
34 B1MGU0 Probable conserved lipoprotein LpqG 249 25.7 MAB_0525c
35 B1MCI6 SBP_bac_5 domain-containing protein 558 58.9 MAB_2878c
36 B1MEV1 Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE 582 64.6 MAB_3481
37 B1MLJ1 Probable pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase RocA 544 58.6 MAB_1330
38 B1MKD6 Putative polyketide synthase Pks16 549 59 MAB_1140
39 B1MKF8 Uncharacterized protein (Efem/EfeO family lipoprotein) 384 41.3 MAB_1162c
40 B1MJ75 Probable polyketide synthase 3697 393.6 MAB_0939
41 B1MGZ4 Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE 715 74.8 MAB_0580
42 B1MCV1 Trk system potassium uptake protein CeoB 229 24.2 MAB_2994
43 B1MP09 Probable long-chain-fatty-acid–CoA ligase FadD 603 63.8 MAB_1978c
44 B1MGG3 Possible L-lactate dehydrogenase (Cytochrome) LldD1 392 41.9 MAB_3834c
45 B1MLD7 Probable fatty-acid-coa ligase FadD 1178 128.6 MAB_4714c
46 B1MJQ1 Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE 727 77 MAB_4336
47 B1MD56 Alanine dehydrogenase 371 38.7 MAB_3100
48 B1MK00 Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE 614 67.1 MAB_4437
49 B1ML19 Putative Mce family protein 393 40.4 MAB_4595c
50 B1ME12 Putative short chain dehydrogenase/reductase 284 29.6 MAB_3405
51 B1MKE0 Probable short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 294 31 MAB_1144c
52 B1MG05 Probable succinate dehydrogenase SdhB 260 29 MAB_3676
53 B1MJK2 Uncharacterized protein 200 21.7 MAB_1068c
54 B1MM89 Uncharacterized protein (LysM domain-containing protein) 449 49 MAB_4806c
55 B1MJG0 DUF1942 domain-containing protein (MPT63-like domain) 310 30.1 MAB_1026c
56 B1MKG1 Enolase 430 45 MAB_1165
57 B1MNW5 Glutamine synthetase 478 53.4 MAB_1933c
58 B1MAY1 Translation initiation factor IF-3 176 19.5 MAB_2321
59 B1MG60 60 kDa chaperonin 539 56 MAB_3731c

Table 6.

Surface proteins identified in planktonic bacteria, secondary biofilm (BF) (7H9), and secondary BF (SCFM).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MNX2 Uncharacterized protein 249 26.9 MAB_1940c
2 B1MKD0 Probable membrane protein, MmpL 981 107.3 MAB_1134c
3 B1MAN4 Conserved hypothetical membrane protein 317 33.6 MAB_2224c
4 B1MAW1 Putative membrane protein, mmpL 984 107.9 MAB_2301
5 B1MB89 Probable NADH dehydrogenase (NDH) 484 52 MAB_2429c
6 B1MCR7 Uncharacterized protein 682 73.5 MAB_2960
7 B1MLX5 Possible lipoprotein peptidase LpqM 484 52.4 MAB_1466c
8 B1MB39 Hypothetical lipoprotein LpqH 162 15.6 MAB_2379
9 B1MGH4 Uncharacterized protein (SHOCT domain-containing protein) 266 28.8 MAB_3845c
10 B1MMD6 Probable cation-transporting ATPase G 653 66.6 MAB_4853c
11 B1MJ98 Probable cation-transporting ATPase E 800 84.1 MAB_0962
12 B1MNZ9 Cytochrome bc1 complex cytochrome c subunit 295 31.1 MAB_1968c
13 B1MMM0 Uncharacterized protein 1144 118.4 MAB_4937
14 B1MDL5 Uncharacterized protein 245 26.9 MAB_3258c
15 B1MG09 Strictosidine synthase family protein 342 35.9 MAB_3680
16 B1MFL7 MurNAc-LAA domain-containing protein 272 27.8 MAB_0318c
17 B1MKQ2 Uncharacterized protein (lipid droplet-associated protein) 231 25.1 MAB_1256c
18 B1MEJ2 Iron-sulfur cluster-binding protein, RIESKE family 517 58.1 MAB_0156c
19 B1MC44 Probable macrolide ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 542 58.6 MAB_2736c
20 B1MKK5 Isoprenyl transferase 260 29.5 MAB_1209
21 B1MBM0 Uncharacterized protein (LGFP repeat) 201 20.5 MAB_2560
22 B1MI34 Uncharacterized protein (CAS/CSE protein) 306 32.7 MAB_0760c
23 B1MAY5 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 318 33.8 MAB_2325
24 B1MFL0 FAD-binding PCMH-type domain-containing protein 456 51.2 MAB_0311c

Table 8.

Unique proteins identified in planktonic bacteria and secondary biofilm (SCFM).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MLS5 Putative lipoprotein LprB 195 20.6 MAB_1416

Table 7.

Surface proteins unique to primary biofilm (BF) (7H9), secondary BF (7H9), and secondary BF (SCFM).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MJ65 Uncharacterized protein (p-aminobenzoate N-oxygenase AurF) 351 40.3 MAB_0929
2 B1MKG2 Uncharacterized protein (Septum formation initiator) 213 22.4 MAB_1166
3 B1MAK0 DUF4333 domain-containing protein 271 28.7 MAB_2190
4 B1MJ23 Hypothetical lipoprotein lpqH 158 15.5 MAB_0885c
5 B1MAN6 Conserved hypothetical transmembrane protein 462 47 MAB_2226c
6 B1MIZ5 Putative Fe-S oxidoreductase 976 103.7 MAB_4293
7 B1MIG7 Putative membrane protein, MmpL 987 107.6 MAB_4115c
8 B1MIS4 Uncharacterized protein 442 47.3 MAB_4222
9 B1MK70 Putative membrane protein, MmpL 1001 107.6 MAB_4508
10 B1MIW6 Uncharacterized protein (secreted) 243 26.9 MAB_4264c
11 B1MB68 Uncharacterized protein (von Willebrand factor, type A) 611 62.9 MAB_2408c
12 B1MMP0 Uncharacterized protein 78 8.4 MAB_1516
13 B1MII0 Uncharacterized protein 263 27.8 MAB_4128c
14 B1ME75 Possible serine/threonine phosphatase Ppp 501 52.3 MAB_0037c
15 B1MIG8 Putative membrane protein, MmpL 959 104.1 MAB_4116c
16 B1MGJ6 Uncharacterized protein (Inhibition of morphological differentiation protein) 293 31.2 MAB_0431c
17 B1MHK5 Uncharacterized protein 418 44.5 MAB_4012c
18 B1MAP0 Hypothetical PPE family protein 523 53.9 MAB_2230c
19 B1MAW3 Putative membrane protein, MmpL 997 109.7 MAB_2303
20 B1MB23 Uncharacterized protein (Channel-forming protein) 310 31.9 MAB_2363
21 B1MB79 PknH_C domain-containing protein 269 28.6 MAB_2419c
22 B1ME72 Putative serine/threonine-protein kinase PknA 420 44.2 MAB_0034c
23 B1MPH0 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase 792 84 MAB_2140
24 B1MFV7 Bifunctional membrane-associated penicillin-binding protein PonA2/glycosyl transferase 811 85.2 MAB_0408c
25 B1MGB9 Possible protease IV SppA (Endopeptidase IV) 583 61.6 MAB_3789c
26 B1MIZ3 Uncharacterized protein (Proline-rich protein) 605 62.8 MAB_4291
27 B1MMP8 Uncharacterized protein (CBS domain-containing protein) 429 46.8 MAB_1524c
28 B1MIQ8 Putative amino acid transporter 513 54.6 MAB_4206
29 B1ML01 NAD(P) transhydrogenase subunit beta 481 49.7 MAB_4577c
30 B1MEW8 UPF0182 protein MAB_3498c 988 107.1 MAB_3498c
31 B1MNZ8 Probable ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase iron-sulfur subunit (Rieske iron-sulfur protein) 391 42.9 MAB_1967c
32 B1MF58 Lipoprotein LpqB 584 61.7 MAB_3589c
33 B1MEU5 Cell division ATP-binding protein FtsE 229 25.6 MAB_3475c
34 B1MEM5 Probable arabinosyltransferase C 1085 116.7 MAB_0189c
35 B1MPH3 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit J 259 27.1 MAB_2143
36 B1MGU8 ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FtsH 750 80.5 MAB_0533
37 B1MJ91 Probable sensor histidine kinase PrrB 470 50.6 MAB_0955c
38 B1MCV2 Trk system potassium uptake protein CeoC 219 23.8 MAB_2995
39 B1MCI8 Protein translocase subunit SecD 586 61.4 MAB_2880c
40 B1MB57 Protein translocase subunit SecA 772 84.8 MAB_2397
41 B1MLG6 Probable short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 268 28.9 MAB_1305
42 B1MPE7 Hypothetical short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 293 31 MAB_2117
43 B1MHE0 Possible oxidoreductase 295 31.9 MAB_3947
44 B1MDZ7 Probable FeIII-dicitrate-binding periplasmic lipoprotein 346 36.2 MAB_3390
45 B1ML03 Probable NAD(P) transhydrogenase, alpha1 subunit PntAA 362 37.4 MAB_4579c
46 B1MJQ0 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 283 29.6 MAB_4335
47 B1ME27 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 294 31.9 MAB_3420c
48 B1MJH3 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 249 26.2 MAB_1039
49 B1MEK1 Putative acyltransferase 268 29.1 MAB_0165
50 B1MCE3 Uncharacterized protein (Deazaflavin-dependent nitroreductase) 142 15.2 MAB_2835
51 B1MHK2 Uncharacterized protein (Deazaflavin-dependent nitroreductase) 151 16.8 MAB_4009c
52 B1MJQ4 Saccharopine_dehydrogenase_NADP domain-containing protein 415 44.3 MAB_4339c
53 B1MH29 Putative acyl-CoA dehydrogenase 387 42.8 MAB_0615
54 B1MJI2 Probable class II aldolase 268 29.3 MAB_1048c
55 B1MIL0 Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE 392 43.1 MAB_4158
56 B1MH42 AAA_31 domain-containing protein 1041 109.9 MAB_0628
57 B1MJY6 Putative succinate dehydrogenase, iron-sulfur subunit 248 28.4 MAB_4423
58 B1MNU9 Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 457 49.5 MAB_1917
59 B1MNU7 Probable fatty-acid-coa ligase FadD 600 65 MAB_1915
60 B1MB08 Possible long-chain acyl-CoA synthase 989 105.5 MAB_2348
61 B1MKW1 Uncharacterized protein (L,D-ATPase catalytic domain-containing protein) 333 35.7 MAB_4537c
62 B1MLH3 Beta-lactamase-like 633 69.4 MAB_1312
63 B1MEL5 Probable fatty-acid-CoA ligase FadD 637 68.9 MAB_0179
64 B1MGS2 Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 461 50.3 MAB_0507
65 B1MFZ9 Adenosine deaminase 362 39.4 MAB_3670c
66 B1MHH4 Probable zinc metalloprotease 691 75.8 MAB_3981c
67 B1MEL2 Antigen 85-A 333 35.8 MAB_0176
68 B1MEL3 Antigen 85-A/B/C 325 34.9 MAB_0177
69 B1MB96 Uncharacterized protein (Alanine and proline-rich secreted protein Apa) 344 34.8 MAB_2436
70 B1MEL1 Antigen 85-C 324 34.7 MAB_0175
71 B1MDH6 Chromosomal replication initiator protein DnaA 491 55 MAB_0001

Table 9.

Surface proteins unique to primary biofilm (BF) (7H9) and secondary BF (7H9).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MID7 Uncharacterized protein 447 49.5 MAB_4085c
2 B1MJV4 Putative ABC transporter, periplasmic substrate-binding 330 34.7 MAB_4390
3 B1MK78 Hypothetical porin (MspA) 223 23.4 MAB_1080
4 B1MJB0 Uncharacterized protein (PE-PGRS family protein) 606 61.2 MAB_0974

Table 10.

Surface proteins unique to primary biofilm (BF) (7H9) and secondary BF (SCFM).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MAX9 Lysylphosphatidylglycerol biosynthesis bifunctional protein LysX 1110 122.1 MAB_2319c

Table 11.

Surface proteins unique to secondary biofilm (BF) (7H9) and secondary BF (SCFM).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MM28 Putative membrane protein, MmpS 147 15.2 MAB_4745
2 B1MGS5 Probable non-ribosomal peptide synthase 1342 141.6 MAB_0510c
3 B1MKJ2 Proline-rich antigen (36 kDa antigen) 190 19.5 MAB_1196
4 B1MEE6 Conserved hypothetical membrane protein 222 23.3 MAB_0110c
5 B1MDT9 Uncharacterized protein (DoxX family protein) 268 28.4 MAB_3332c
6 B1MC32 VWFA domain-containing protein 336 35.9 MAB_2724c
7 B1MFX2 Conserved hypothetical membrane protein 173 18.7 MAB_0423c
8 B1MEM8 Probable oxidoreductase 507 55.1 MAB_0192c
9 B1MHI8 Uncharacterized protein (hydrolase) 305 32.6 MAB_3995
10 B1MEF0 Uncharacterized protein 371 40 MAB_0114
11 B1MKI6 Uncharacterized protein 281 29 MAB_1190
12 B1MJG4 Uncharacterized protein 136 15.7 MAB_1030
13 B1MP25 Probable conserved lipoprotein LppM 226 24.1 MAB_1994c
14 B1MK66 Uncharacterized protein 481 52.4 MAB_4504c
15 B1MHY2 Uncharacterized protein 600 65.4 MAB_0708
16 B1MGV4 Conserved hypothetical transmembrane protein 493 53.7 MAB_0539
17 B1MBP9 Uncharacterized protein 257 28.9 MAB_2589c
18 B1MHR9 Uncharacterized protein 313 32.4 MAB_4077
19 B1ML18 Putative Mce family protein 452 47.6 MAB_4594c
20 B1MB71 Uncharacterized protein (CBS domain-containing protein) 453 48.1 MAB_2411c
21 B1MJY4 Putative succinate dehydrogenase 269 30.7 MAB_4421
22 B1MG85 Putative FtsK/SpoIIIE family protein 1311 142.3 MAB_3756c
23 B1MJD8 Uncharacterized protein 229 24.6 MAB_1004c
24 B1ML23 Putative Mce family protein 510 52.6 MAB_4599c
25 B1MM24 Putative terminal quinol oxidase, subunit I 341 37 MAB_4741c
26 B1MP49 Uncharacterized protein 154 15.8 MAB_2018
27 B1ML20 Putative Mce family protein 379 40.2 MAB_4596c
28 B1MCI2 Probable peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 307 32.3 MAB_2874
29 B1MEK9 UbiA prenyltransferase family protein 304 32.8 MAB_0173
30 B1MKU5 Uncharacterized protein (AI-2E family transporter) 399 41.8 MAB_4521c
31 B1ME28 Uncharacterized protein 291 31 MAB_3421
32 B1MIY5 Uncharacterized protein (Dynamin N-terminal domain-containing protein) 627 68.5 MAB_4283c
33 B1MNZ5 Uncharacterized protein 240 24.2 MAB_1964
34 B1ME59 DUF3566 domain-containing protein 313 33 MAB_0020
35 B1MJI6 Uncharacterized protein 272 28.4 MAB_1052c
36 B1MB80 PknH_C domain-containing protein 251 26.5 MAB_2420c
37 B1MNZ7 Probable ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase cytochrome b subunit 546 60.4 MAB_1966c
38 B1MPG9 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit F 434 46.7 MAB_2139
39 B1MAF6 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase, M subunit NuoM 535 56.8 MAB_2146
40 B1MK76 Putative serine protease 437 43.4 MAB_1078
41 B1MFX0 Possible membrane-associated serine protease 421 43.3 MAB_0421
42 B1MH83 Probable histidine kinase response regulator 567 60.1 MAB_3890c
43 B1MGH1 Probable cationic amino acid transport integral membrane protein 491 51.3 MAB_3842
44 B1MM45 DUF3533 domain-containing protein 648 68.5 MAB_4762
45 B1MEN9 Probable o-antigen/lipopolysaccharide transport ATP-binding protein ABC transporter RfbE 263 28.7 MAB_0203c
46 B1MAS1 Hypothetical ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 582 61.7 MAB_2261c
47 B1MF69 Putative cation transporter 307 32.4 MAB_3600c
48 B1MN95 Membrane protein OxaA 361 40.4 MAB_4953c
49 B1MPG7 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit D 432 47.6 MAB_2137
50 B1ML95 Probable ABC transporter, permease protein 368 38.7 MAB_4672c
51 B1MP37 UDP-N-acetylglucosamine–N-acetylmuramyl-(pentapeptide) pyrophosphoryl-undecaprenol N-acetylglucosamine transferase 382 40.1 MAB_2006
52 B1MEU4 Cell division protein FtsX 300 32.8 MAB_3474c
53 B1MEM2 Probable arabinosyltransferase A 1097 116.5 MAB_0186c
54 B1MEH0 Probable pyruvate dehydrogenase 579 62.1 MAB_0134c
55 B1MJH6 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 520 57.7 MAB_1042c
56 B1MLV8 ATP synthase subunit b 177 18.5 MAB_1449
57 B1MPG6 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit C 228 25.6 MAB_2136
58 B1MDZ6 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 564 62.6 MAB_3389c
59 B1MAN5 Probable peptidase 461 46.5 MAB_2225c
60 B1MF59 Probable sensor histidine kinase MtrB 576 62.6 MAB_3590c
61 B1MNV9 Putative sensor-type histidine kinase PrrB 429 45.8 MAB_1927
62 B1MEU7 MscS Mechanosensitive ion channel 350 38 MAB_3477c
63 B1MIU8 Putative Na+/H+ antiporter 555 59.1 MAB_4246
64 B1MGL4 Probable copper-transporting ATPase 646 66.9 MAB_0449
65 B1MLN4 Probable sugar ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein SugC 391 42 MAB_1375
66 B1MFQ4 Ammonium transporter 441 45.6 MAB_0355
67 B1MAS2 Hypothetical ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 862 93.9 MAB_2262c
68 B1MKF5 Putative iron permease FTR1 683 71.6 MAB_1159
69 B1MCU8 Na(+)/H(+) antiporter NhaA 441 46.2 MAB_2991c
70 B1MGB4 Protein translocase subunit SecY 419 45.6 MAB_3784c
71 B1MCI7 Protein-export membrane protein SecF 424 45 MAB_2879c
72 B1MPD4 Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone) 353 37.2 MAB_2104c
73 B1MHZ3 Putative oligopeptide ABC transporter,solute-binding protein 528 58 MAB_0719
74 B1MFX5 Probable peptide ABC transporter DppA 539 59.7 MAB_0426
75 B1MC01 Uncharacterized protein (nitroreductase) 145 16.1 MAB_2692c
76 B1MEK2 Putative acyltransferase 254 27.7 MAB_0166
77 B1ML94 Probable ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 238 25.1 MAB_4671c
78 B1MJE4 Putative MCE family protein 498 52.1 MAB_1010c
79 B1MN49 Isoprenyl transferase 302 34.6 MAB_1676
80 B1MDD7 Probable lipoprotein LppI 235 24.1 MAB_3181
81 B1MLK3 Probable fatty-acid-CoA ligase FadD 596 65 MAB_1342
82 B1MF08 DAGKc domain-containing protein 325 34.7 MAB_3538
83 B1MH44 CbiA domain-containing protein 638 67.9 MAB_0630
84 B1MCU4 Uncharacterized protein (Outer membrane receptor protein) 175 18.7 MAB_2987
85 B1MNT8 Pyridoxamine 5’-phosphate oxidase-related 267 28.2 MAB_1906
86 B1MD78 Putative acyl-CoA dehydrogenase 413 44.6 MAB_3122
87 B1MGZ0 Putative ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 261 28.3 MAB_0576c
88 B1MGW2 Putative iron compound ABC transporter 330 35.8 MAB_0547c
89 B1MGE0 Putative hydrolase, alpha/beta fold 286 31.5 MAB_3810
90 B1MGD1 Uncharacterized protein (VCBS repeat-containing protein) 179 18.5 MAB_3801c
91 B1MPG8 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase, E subunit NuoE 247 26.7 MAB_2138
92 B1MBT5 Putative ABC transporter/extracellular ligand-binding receptor 394 40.9 MAB_2626c
93 B1MGY1 Putative lipoprotein lpqE 227 23.2 MAB_0567c
94 B1MH09 Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase FadE 386 42.5 MAB_0595c
95 B1MGC0 Uncharacterized protein (Sensor domain-containing protein) 527 56.9 MAB_3790
96 B1MGM8 Probable oxidase (Copper-binding protein) 512 54.1 MAB_0463c
97 B1MHH6 Uncharacterized protein (Lipoprotein) 194 20.4 MAB_3983c
98 B1MH57 Putative short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 304 32.2 MAB_0643
99 B1MMK7 Uncharacterized protein (proline rich 28 kDa antigen) 321 32 MAB_4924
100 B1MEX3 Putative ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 474 52.3 MAB_3503
101 B1MM44 Uncharacterized protein (ABC transporter) 241 26 MAB_4761
102 B1MP15 Probable 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 245 26.7 MAB_1984
103 B1MLZ8 Probable acyl-CoA ligase FadD 598 64.2 MAB_1489
104 B1MJ71 Putative fatty-acid–CoA ligase FadD 572 61.9 MAB_0935c
105 B1MDX4 Putative fatty-acid-CoA ligase 1163 127.5 MAB_3367
106 B1MPF0 Putative polyketide synthase MbtC 441 45.4 MAB_2120c
107 B1MCR9 Probable fatty-acid-CoA ligase FadD 1184 127.8 MAB_2962
108 B1MB93 Molybdenum ABC transporter ModA, periplasmic 273 27.4 MAB_2433
109 B1MG92 Cutinase 228 23.5 MAB_3763
110 B1MNN1 Neutral metalloproteinase 347 37.2 MAB_1849
111 B1MFL1 Enolase 424 44.1 MAB_0312c
112 B1MN45 GTPase Era 304 33.4 MAB_1672
113 B1MEI3 Uncharacterized protein (ESX secretion-associated protein EspG) 247 26.5 MAB_0147c

Table 12.

Surface proteins unique to primary biofilm (7H9).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MN43 Uncharacterized protein (VBS domain-containing protein) 435 46.9 MAB_1670

Table 13.

Surface proteins unique to secondary biofilm (7H9).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MP27 Conserved hypothetical transmembrane protein 134 14.3 MAB_1996
2 B1MJD9 Putative MCE family protein 416 44.3 MAB_1005c
3 B1MET1 Uncharacterized protein (Nitroreductase) 142 16.1 MAB_3461c
4 B1MCG8 Uncharacterized protein (Deazaflavin-dependent nitroreductase) 148 16.3 MAB_2860c
5 B1MF62 Possible Mg2+ transport P-type ATPase C MgtC 240 25.4 MAB_3593
6 B1MPH1 NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit H 422 45.3 MAB_2141
7 B1MJK9 50S ribosomal protein L32 57 6.6 MAB_1075
8 B1MJL2 Uncharacterized protein 554 55.4 MAB_4296c
9 B1MFZ2 Uncharacterized protein (protein secretion) 108 10.7 MAB_3663
10 B1MGX7 4HBT domain-containing protein 182 19.2 MAB_0563
11 B1ME15 Uncharacterized protein (Maleypyruvate isomerase family mycothiol-dependent enzyme, MDMPI) 245 26.7 MAB_3408c
12 B1MDU0 Probable conserved lipoprotein LppZ 387 39.9 MAB_3333
13 B1MBY8 Uncharacterized protein (PE-PGRS family protein) 576 57.9 MAB_2679
14 B1MPE9 Putative polyketide synthase MbtD 1010 108.2 MAB_2119c
15 B1MCS0 Probable fatty-acid-CoA ligase FadD 1183 128.2 MAB_2963

Table 14.

Surface proteins unique to secondary biofilm (SCFM).

Accession Description # AAs MW [kDa] Ensembl Gene ID
1 B1MCA2 Uncharacterized protein (low molecular weight protein antigen 6 PH domain-containing) 150 16.3 MAB_2794c
2 B1MLN0 Conserved hypothetical transmembrane protein 173 18.3 MAB_1371
3 B1MJY7 Uncharacterized protein (Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport) 202 21.6 MAB_4424
4 B1MDE2 Phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase 292 30.5 MAB_3186c
5 B1MHG6 Possible cytochrome C-type biogenesis protein CcsA 323 35.1 MAB_3973c
6 B1MJE2 Putative MCE family protein 348 38.1 MAB_1008c
7 B1ML21 Putative Mce family protein 346 38.3 MAB_4597c
8 B1MDC6 Probable protease/peptidase 415 44.4 MAB_3170c
9 B1MMW0 Probable fatty acid desaturase 403 46 MAB_1587c
10 B1MP19 Probable serine/threonine protein kinase 434 46.6 MAB_1988c
11 B1MKM5 Uncharacterized protein 465 49.4 MAB_1229
12 B1ME36 Putative integral membrane protein 467 50.7 MAB_3429
13 B1MMK9 Uncharacterized protein 458 51.8 MAB_4926
14 B1MG86 Uncharacterized protein (EccD-like transmembrane domain-containing protein) 511 52.2 MAB_3757
15 B1MHG7 Putative cytochrome C biogenesis protein ResB 535 58.5 MAB_3974c
16 B1MDA0 Putative ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein 652 67.3 MAB_3144
17 B1ME06 Probable ABC transporter, ATP-binding 623 70.4 MAB_3399
18 B1MEP1 Uncharacterized protein (alanine and leucing rich) 662 71.2 MAB_0205c
19 B1MJG5 Divalent metal cation transporter MntH 409 43 MAB_1031c
20 B1MAL6 Apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase 602 64 MAB_2206
21 B1MDK8 Sensor protein KdpD 835 88.6 MAB_3251c
22 B1MEM1 Probable arabinosyltransferase B 1071 116.2 MAB_0185c
23 B1MLS6 Putative lipoprotein LprC 185 19.4 MAB_1417
24 B1MBT2 Branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter (LivG) 314 34.4 MAB_2623c
25 B1MBT2 SGNHhydro domain-containing protein 335 35.1 MAB_1193c
26 B1MIS5 Probable glutamine-binding protein GlnH 327 35.9 MAB_4223
27 B1ML22 Putative Mce family protein 350 37.8 MAB_4598c
28 B1MKW8 Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 457 49.5 MAB_4544c

Discussion

The intrinsic resistance of M. abscessus to available antimicrobials creates a major challenge for the treatment of the disease in high-risk populations (18, 19). Therefore, improving our understanding of the pathogenesis of infection in these populations is needed to develop alternative ways to prevent or treat the infectious condition.

M. abscessus, like other environmental microorganisms, has the ability to form biofilms on surfaces, which has been shown as a strategy used by the pathogen to establish a niche on the airway mucosa (12, 20). Past observations in both animal models and humans have demonstrated that M. abscessus biofilm is part of the pathogenesis of lung infections (4, 21). Recent studies have determined that M. abscessus cultured in SCFM, which mimics the mucus environment in the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis, forms a biofilm that differs from biofilms formed under water or in buffer conditions (22, 23), which indicates that in the presence of sputum contents in the airways M. abscessus differentiates and acquires a new phenotype. In addition, the biofilm’s extracellular matrix is formed by eDNA and glycol-phospholipids (21), which, in the case of Mycobacterium avium, has been shown to protect the bacteria against the action of phagocytic cells (24).

In this work, we demonstrate that bacteria in M. abscessus biofilm at some point are able to release from the initial biofilm mass and probably seed in an adjacent site in the airway. This information is important since in our model it was observed that bacteria in biofilms formed under SCFM sputum conditions, once detached, can establish another biofilm with significantly greater efficiency than bacteria in biofilm developed under phosphate buffer conditions. In fact, previous studies in the laboratory have determined that M. abscessus is capable of utilizing the magnesium concentration in the cystic fibrosis medium environment to quickly establish a niche and develop a robust biofilm (9). Furthermore, bacteria released from biofilms in the airways can be expelled in the sputum, which increases the chance of transmission by aerosols in the airway of a second individual. In fact, recent observations by diverse groups have suggested that non-tuberculous mycobacteria can be transmitted from an individual to a recipient, most likely in the environment of clinics that assist patients belonging to at-risk groups (6, 7, 25). The hypotheses and the observations in studies on necropsy in animals or lung transplantation in humans suggest that bacteria released from biofilms may be transported upward or downward depending on the flow of the air either leaving or entering the airways. A limitation of our study is that despite the hypothesis and the previous observations, we do not provide visual proof in this study. A previous study demonstrated the possibility that environmental mycobacteria can be transmitted from person to person, although the prolonged time between infection and disease makes the epidemiological connection very difficult. Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model, M. avium infection could be transmitted directly from one host to another without the environmental step that was previously thought to be required (26, 27). A clear consequence of these findings is that an infection can be transmitted from host to host without the environmental step, which makes the bacterial phenotype released from the biofilm one of the potential phenotypes that transmit the infection.

Bacteria released from biofilm in cystic fibrosis medium were shown to be able to establish a secondary biofilm at the same rate as the primary biofilm ( Figure 2 ). The SCFM biomass was more robust than the biofilm formed by bacteria released from HBSS-established biofilm, showing that bacteria in the presence of a cystic fibrosis environment can still efficiently seed in another location in the airways. In addition, detached M. abscessus invades epithelial cells more efficiently than planktonic bacteria, indicating that the process of binding to establish a primary biofilm and then the subsequent release and formation of a secondary biofilm is associated with bacterial structural modifications, most likely on the bacterial surface. The number of different proteins expressed by the bacterial surface released from biofilms in comparison with bacteria attached to the biofilm is striking. When comparing proteins uniquely expressed by the released bacteria that were not expressed in the other conditions, several uncharacterized proteins, an Mg++ transport, and a few lipoproteins and polyketide synthases were identified. Matching the mutant MAB_3538, which has kinase activity, in the detached biofilm groupings is an interesting finding. A definitive analysis of the function of these proteins is warranted.

Although the changes on the bacterial surface described in this study and in recent publications (22, 23) are responsible for the different interactions between the pathogen and host cells, an increased uptake by the phagocyte could be a plausible outcome. Our results also demonstrated that the ingested bacteria are not killed by macrophages and grow inside the phagocytic cells at a higher rate than planktonic bacteria. The question of why bacteria uptake is increased with better survival outcomes is pertinent here. Since significant changes occur during intracellular survival, one may hypothesize that the presence of adherent molecules on the bacterial surface is advantageous for disease progression. More research needs to be conducted to understand the effects of the identified genes during infections.

The ability of several different bacterial species to detach from biofilms seems to be dictated by a quorum-sensing mechanism (28). Quorum sensing is well-described for Gram-negative bacteria, mostly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio sp. and Gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus (28). There are three known quorum-sensing types. Type I utilizes N-acyl homoserine lactone, while the other two (types II and III) are regulated by other autoinducers, many of them peptides (2830). Autoinducers accumulate in the environment as the bacteria population increases and stimulate the expression of membrane transporters and activation of histidine kinases inside the bacterium. P. aeruginosa has several interconnected quorum-sensing circuits that collectively regulate hundreds of genes (31). Pseudomonas has three major circuits that regulate approximately 10% of the bacterial genes (32). Two circuits respond to N-acyl homoserine lactone signals and a third one, the Pseudomonas quinolone signal system, uses the quinolone signal to interact with RHI receptors which also recognize homoserine lactone signals. These signals are detected by receptors present in the cytoplasm or in the membrane. Gram-positive bacteria, in contrast, use peptides as signaling molecules. They usually bind to membrane histidine kinase receptors that autophosphorylate, although, in some cases, the peptides are transported in the cytoplasm where they interact with the transcription factors (28). Mycobacterial proteins do not share any homology with known quorum-sensing-linked proteins of different bacteria. However, several of the small proteins identified in our work as being expressed under biofilm in SCFM and detachment phenotypes have signal peptides and are potentially exported in the biofilm setting. Other researchers are currently addressing this hypothesis regarding the function of surface proteins and their potential participation as signal proteins (13, 28, 3335).

One should consider that detachment from biofilms may depend on the type and the status of the patient’s immune system, which can interfere with the dissemination of the pathogen in their lungs. It is also important to take into account the pathogen’s phenotype which can be influenced by the lung environment (36).

In summary, this work shows that M. abscessus can release from biofilms on the surface of mucosal epithelial cells and these released bacteria are very efficient in developing a new biofilm to bind to mucosal epithelial cells and infect macrophages. Based on the findings that M. abscessus can infect patients directly, the released bacteria can be considered an infectious phenotype. The proteomic sequences of the released bacterial surface proteins identified potential candidates involved in the detachment from biofilm and these need to be studied further.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The reported work was funded by NIH grant AI152258, and San Francisco Microbiology Foundation grant # 102.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies on humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because only commercially available established cell lines were used.

Author contributions

BK: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. AL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1. Floto RA, Haworth CS. The growing threat of nontuberculous mycobacteria in CF. J Cyst Fibros. (2015) 14:1–2. doi:  10.1016/j.jcf.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Martiniano SL, Nick JA, Daley CL. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in cystic fibrosis. Clin Chest Med. (2022) 43:697–716. doi:  10.1016/j.ccm.2022.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Johansen MD, Herrmann J-L, Kremer L. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus. 7. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2020) 18:392–407. doi:  10.1038/s41579-020-0331-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ryan K, Byrd TF. Mycobacterium abscessus: shapeshifter of the mycobacterial world. Front Microbiol. (2018) 9:2642. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2018.02642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ, Andrejak C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Eur Respir J. (2020) 56:2000535. doi:  10.1183/13993003.00535-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bryant JM, Brown KP, Burbaud S, Everall I, Belardinelli JM, Rodriguez-Rincon D, et al. Stepwise pathogenic evolution of Mycobacterium abscessus. Science. (2021) 372:eabb8699. doi:  10.1126/science.abb8699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ruis C, Bryant JM, Bell SC, Thomson R, Davidson RM, Hasan NA, et al. Dissemination of Mycobacterium abscessus via global transmission networks. Nat Microbiol. (2021) 6:1279–88. doi:  10.1038/s41564-021-00963-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Miranda-CasoLuengo AA, Staunton PM, Dinan AM, Lohan AJ, Loftus BJ. Functional characterization of the Mycobacterium abscessus genome coupled with condition specific transcriptomics reveals conserved molecular strategies for host adaptation and persistence. BMC Genomics. (2016) 17:553. doi:  10.1186/s12864-016-2868-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Keefe BF, Bermudez LE. Environment in the lung of cystic fibrosis patients stimulates the expression of biofilm phenotype in Mycobacterium abscessus. J Med Microbiol. (2022) 71:001467. doi:  10.1099/jmm.0.001467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fennelly KP, Ojano-Dirain C, Yang Q, Liu L, Lu L, Progulske-Fox A, et al. Biofilm formation by mycobacterium abscessus in a lung cavity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 193:692–3. doi:  10.1164/rccm.201508-1586IM [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Belardinelli JM, Li W, Avanzi C, Angala SK, Lian E, Wiersma CJ, et al. Unique features of mycobacterium abscessus biofilms formed in synthetic cystic fibrosis medium. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12:743126. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2021.743126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Rose SJ, Babrak LM, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium possesses extracellular DNA that contributes to biofilm formation, structural integrity, and tolerance to antibiotics. PloS One. (2015) 10:e0128772. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0128772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Palmer KL, Mashburn LM, Singh PK, Whiteley M. Cystic fibrosis sputum supports growth and cues key aspects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa physiology. J Bacteriol. (2005) 187:5267–77. doi:  10.1128/JB.187.15.5267-5277.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rose SJ, Bermudez LE. Identification of bicarbonate as a trigger and genes involved with extracellular DNA export in mycobacterial biofilms. mBio. (2016) 7:e01597–16. doi:  10.1128/mBio.01597-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Leestemaker-Palmer AL, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium abscessus infection results in decrease of oxidative metabolism of lung airways cells and relaxation of the epithelial mucosal tight junctions. Tuberculosis (Edinb). (2023) 138:102303. doi:  10.1016/j.tube.2023.102303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lewis MS, Danelishvili L, Rose SJ, Bermudez LE. MAV_4644 Interaction with the Host Cathepsin Z Protects Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis from Rapid Macrophage Killing. Microorganisms. (2019) 7:144. doi:  10.3390/microorganisms7050144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Danelishvili L, Rojony R, Carson KL, Palmer AL, Rose SJ, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis effector MAVA5_06970 promotes rapid apoptosis in secondary-infected macrophages during cell-to-cell spread. Virulence. (2018) 9:1287–300. doi:  10.1080/21505594.2018.1504559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Griffith DE, Girard WM, Wallace RJ. Clinical features of pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria. An analysis of 154 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1993) 147:1271–8. doi:  10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2012) 67:810–8. doi:  10.1093/jac/dkr578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Esteban J, García-Coca M. Mycobacterium biofilms. Front Microbiol. (2017) 8:2651. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2017.02651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Blanchard JD, Elias V, Cipolla D, Gonda I, Bermudez LE. Effective Treatment of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis and Mycobacterium abscessus Species Infections in Macrophages, Biofilm, and Mice by Using Liposomal Ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2018) 62:e00440–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wiersma CJ, Belardinelli JM, Avanzi C, Angala SK, Everall I, Angala B, et al. Cell Surface Remodeling of Mycobacterium abscessus under Cystic Fibrosis Airway Growth Conditions. ACS Infect Dis. (2020) 6:2143–54. doi:  10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Leestemaker-Palmer A, Ong T, Bermudez LE. Exposure of Mycobacteriodes abscessus to mucin affects bacterial phenotype. Sci Rep. (2024) 15:393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rose SJ, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium biofilm attenuates mononuclear phagocyte function by triggering hyperstimulation and apoptosis during early infection. Infect Immun. (2014) 82:405–12. doi:  10.1128/IAI.00820-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kreutzfeldt KM, McAdam PR, Claxton P, Holmes A, Seagar AL, Laurenson IF, et al. Molecular longitudinal tracking of Mycobacterium abscessus spp. during chronic infection of the human lung. PloS One. (2013) 8:e63237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Everman JL, Ziaie NR, Bechler J, Bermudez LE. Establishing Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis infection and intestinal colonization. Biol Open. (2015) 4:1330–5. doi:  10.1242/bio.012260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bermudez LE, Rose SJ, Everman JL, Ziaie NR. Establishment of a Host-to-Host Transmission Model for Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis Using Caenorhabditis elegans and Identification of Colonization-Associated Genes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2018) 8:123. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2018.00123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2012) 2:a012427. doi:  10.1101/cshperspect.a012427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Boles BR, Horswill AR. Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PloS Pathog. (2008) 4:e1000052. doi:  10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Borlee BR, Geske GD, Blackwell HE, Handelsman J. Identification of synthetic inducers and inhibitors of the quorum-sensing regulator LasR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by high-throughput screening. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2010) 76:8255–8. doi:  10.1128/AEM.00499-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lazar V. Quorum sensing in biofilms -How to destroy the bacterial citadels or their cohesion/power? Anaerobe. (2011) 117:280–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mattman ME, Blackwell HE. Small molecules that modulate quorum sensing and control virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Org Chem. (2010) 75:6737–6746. doi:  10.1021/jo101237e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ji G, Beavis RC, Novick RP. Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1995) 92:12055–9. doi:  10.1073/pnas.92.26.12055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Magnuson R, Solomon J, Grossman AD. Biochemical and genetic characterization of a competence pheromone from B. subtilis. Cell. (1994) 77:207–16. doi:  10.1016/0092-8674(94)90313-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lilley BN, Bassler BL. Regulation of quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi by LuxO and sigma-54. Mol Microbiol. (2000) 36:940–54. doi:  10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01913.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Leestemaker-Palmer A, Ong T, Bermudez LE. Environmental conditions encountered in the lung are associated with changes in Mycobacterioides abscessus phenotypes over time. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:393. doi:  10.1038/s41598-024-84451-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES