Skip to main content
Clinical Kidney Journal logoLink to Clinical Kidney Journal
. 2025 Feb 24;18(3):sfaf057. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf057

Causal relationships between immune cell phenotypes and primary glomerular diseases: genetic evidence from bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Wenhao Tang 1, Qiu Li 2, Xueying Yang 3,, Haiping Yang 4,
PMCID: PMC11926596  PMID: 40123962

ABSTRACT

Background

Primary glomerular diseases (PGDs), including nephrotic syndrome (NS), membranous nephropathy (MN), and IgA nephropathy (IgAN), are complex renal conditions influenced by immune system dysregulation. Although associations between immune cell phenotypes and PGDs have been observed, the precise causal relationships have not been fully elucidated.

Methods

Utilizing genetic association data from genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we investigated 731 immunophenotypes in relation to PGDs. A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, primarily employing inverse variance weighting (IVW), was conducted to establish causality. MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were used as complementary methods to reinforce the robustness and validity of the results. Sensitivity analyses further validated the sensitivity and stability of our results.

Results

We identified 38 immunophenotypes suggestively related to IgAN, with 20 as risk factors and 18 as protective effects. Six immunophenotypes remained significant after Bonferroni correction: The percentage of CD25hi among T cells; the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not T regulatory (Treg) among T cells; the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg within the CD4+ T cell population; CX3CR1 expression on monocytes; CD40 expression on monocytes; and CD64 expression on CD14+ CD16 monocytes. In the validation analysis of IgAN, CD3 expression on effector memory CD4+ T cells further confirmed the predisposing risk role of effector memory T cells in the development of IgAN. Additionally, the MR analysis demonstrated suggestive associations between 25 immunophenotypes and MN (8 risk factors and 17 protective factors), as well as between 22 immunophenotypes and NS (10 risk factors and 12 protective factors). Last, by intersecting the immunophenotypes showing suggestive associations with PGDs, we identified two common immunophenotypes shared by IgAN and MN, three by IgAN and NS, and one by MN and NS.

Conclusions

This genetic-level investigation uncovers causal associations between immunophenotypes and PGDs, providing valuable insights into the immunological underpinnings of PGDs. Our findings suggest potential targets for treatment strategies, thereby facilitating more personalized and effective therapeutic approaches in PGDs management.

Keywords: immune cell phenotype, Mendelian randomization analysis, primary glomerular diseases

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract


KEY LEARNING POINTS.

What was known:

  • IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, and nephrotic syndrome are the most common forms of PGDs that represent a significant subset of immune-mediated kidney disorders.

  • Multiple studies have highlighted that immune cells play important roles in the progression of PGDs.

This study adds:

  • We present direct genetic evidence, highlighting the crucial roles of specific immune cell phenotypes in the pathogenesis of PGDs.

  • Our results reflect the fact that immunophenotypes is a more critical initiating factor for IgAN in PGDs.

Potential impact:

  • Our research offers invaluable immunological insights for PGDs, paving the way for future early clinical diagnosis and treatment approaches.

INTRODUCTION

Primary glomerular diseases (PGDs) are the leading causes of end-stage renal disease worldwide, necessitating kidney replacement therapy and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This imposes an increasing socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems globally [1, 2]. IgA nephropathy (IgAN), membranous nephropathy (MN), and nephrotic syndrome (NS) are the most common forms of PGD that represent a significant subset of immune-mediated kidney disorders. Despite extensive research, the precise role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of PGDs remains poorly understood.

Immune dysregulation plays a crucial role in the onset and progression of PGDs. For instance, IgAN is characterized by the deposition of IgA-containing immune complexes in the glomeruli, whereas MN is associated with autoantibodies targeting specific podocyte antigens, leading to the immune complex deposition [3, 4]. Notably, the B cell activation factor (BAFF) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), which promote B cell differentiation, maturation, and plasma cell antibody secretion, have been implicated in several glomerular diseases [5]. Targeting BAFF/APRIL with specific inhibitors has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy, with some inhibitors currently in the most advanced stages of clinical validation for IgAN and MN, demonstrating their potential to revolutionize the treatment for this condition [6]. In addition, multiple studies have highlighted the role of adaptive immunity including the imbalance of T cells and innate immunity involving Toll-like receptors and monocytes, in developing PDGs [7–9]. However, the exact pathways through which immune cell phenotypes contribute to the progression of these conditions remain poorly understood. Furthermore, the potential bidirectional interactions between immune responses and glomerular pathology are not well-defined, posing challenges in identifying effective therapeutic targets.

Given these complexities, Mendelian randomization (MR), a rational epidemiological genetic approach, offers a novel perspective for exploring causal relationships between heritable complex traits [10]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were chosen as instrument variables (IVs) to draw credible causal inferences. Consequently, bias in traditional investigations due to confounding factors and reverse causality can be effectively avoided [11]. In the context of PGDs, bidirectional MR allows for the investigation of both the influence of immune cell phenotypes on the development of NS, IgAN, and MN, and the potential feedback effects of these diseases on immune system modulation.

In this study, we employed bidirectional MR by harnessing GWAS summary statistics from leading consortia to infer and genetically investigate the causal effect between immune cell phenotypes and PGDs. The findings are expected to improve our understanding of the immunopathology of PGDs, informing future strategies for management and treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

We utilized two-sample MR to evaluate the causal relationships between 731 immunophenotypes and PGDs. The flowchart of the study is shown in Fig. 1. Selecting of appropriate SNPs as instrumental variables (IVs) for causality analysis requires meeting the following criteria: (i) relevance hypothesis: IVs must be strongly associated with the exposure factors; (ii) independence hypothesis: IVs should not be influenced by other confounders; and (iii) exclusionary hypothesis: IVs should affect the outcome factors solely through the exposure factors. All data for this study were sourced from previously published research and public databases, thus eliminating the need for additional ethical approval.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Flowchart of the study. nSNP, number of SNPs.

Furthermore, we validated the causal relationships between immunophenotypes and IgAN in an independent cohort. However, due to the lack of available independent datasets for MN and NS, it is currently challenging to perform robust replication for these phenotypes. The process for IgAN validation was consistent with the analysis above.

Data sources

The immunity-wide GWAS of 731 immune cell phenotypes, performed by Valeria Orrù et al., involves a cohort of 3757 Europeans [12]. These 731 immunophenotypes include 118 absolute cell counts (AC), 389 median fluorescence intensities (MFI) reflecting surface antigen levels, 32 morphological parameters (MP), and 192 relative cell counts (RC). The analysis highlighted the characteristics of seven major flow cytometry panels: B cells, cDCs (conventional dendritic cells), mature stage T cells, monocytes, myeloid cells, TBNK (T cells, B cells, natural killer cells), and T regulatory (Treg) cells. GWAS summary statistics for each immunophenotypes are publicly available from the GWAS Catalog (GCST90001391 to GCST90002121).

The genetic variables of PGDs were obtained from publicly available GWASs conducted by each leading consortium. The GWAS analysis for IgAN included 11 European cohorts with 26 734 individuals (5556 cases and 21 178 controls), and the data are available from the Kiryluk Laboratory [13]. The GWAS analysis for the IgAN validation cohort included 477 784 European individuals (15 587 cases and 462 197 controls) [14]. The GWAS analysis for MN included five European cohorts with 7979 individuals (2150 cases and 5829 controls), and for NS included 476 030 European individuals (775 cases and 475 255 controls) [14, 15].

Details on the GWAS summary data sources used in our study are provided in Table 1.

Table 1:

The GWAS data source details in our study.

Phenotype Data source Case Control Sample size Ancestry
immunophenotypes Orrù V et al.
GCST90001391 to GCST90002121
3 757 European
IgAN Kiryluk K et al.
PMID: 37337107
5 556 21 178 26 734 European
IgAN (validation) Sakaue S et al.
GCST90018866
15 587 462 197 477 784 European
MN Xie J et al.
GCST010005
2 150 5 829 7 979 European
NS Sakaue S et al.
GCST90018884
775 475 255 476 030 European

Instrumental variable selection

We applied rigorous filtering procedures to pinpoint robust and reliable instrumental variables (IVs) for MR analysis. First, we selected SNPs that were genome-wide significant (< 5 × 10−8) for IgAN, IgAN validation, and MN, and suggestive genome-wide significant (< 1 × 10−5) for immunophenotypes and NS due to its limited significant SNPs. Second, we applied the clumping process with genome linkage disequilibrium in European ancestry (r2 < 0.001, distance threshold >10 000 kb). Proxies based on the correlation (r² > 0.8) with the original SNPs were used in the reverse but not in the forward MR, considering the number of IVs and the potential bias introduced by proxies [16, 17]. Third, to avoid the impact of weak instrumental variables, we calculated the F statistics for all SNPs to assess their strength [18]. Since an F value >10 is considered a non-weak instrument, we select SNPs with F > 10 for MR analysis. Finally, we removed SNPs that were significantly associated with the outcome (P < 1 × 10⁻5) to satisfy the exclusionary hypothesis.

Mendelian randomization

All statistical analyses were performed in R v.4.3.1 software. The detailed information on the software, packages, function, and parameters used are provided in Supplementary Table 1. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was primarily used to determine the causal relationship between immunophenotypes and PGDs, employing the TwoSampleMR package [19]. IVW was the preferred method for this research since it is the most efficient MR analysis with the highest statistical power, assuming that all SNPs serve as valid instrumental variables without horizontal pleiotropy and thus delivering stable and valid causal estimates [20]. However, due to the difficulty of eliminating horizontal pleiotropy in all SNPs in practical applications, the IVW method is prone to bias, which affects the accuracy of the results. Considering this, the MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were used as complementary methods [21]. Typically, to evaluate the robustness of the results, the heterogeneity of IVW estimates is quantified using Cochran's Q test, with a P value below .05 indicating the presence of heterogeneity [22]. However, if the null hypothesis is rejected (P < .05), indicating the presence of heterogeneity among SNPs, the results are then evaluated using the weighted median (WM) method [12]. Causal association between the exposure and the outcome is ruled out when the outcomes of the WM method are also found to be non-significant. To mitigate the impact of horizontal pleiotropy, we employed MR-PRESSO to assess its presence and retained the causal inference effects when pleiotropy was not detected, with a P value below .05 indicating the presence of horizontal pleiotropy [23]. Besides, we used scatterplots to assess causality, visualize the heterogeneity, and check the impact of outliers. Funnel plots evaluated the heterogeneity of IVs, and leave-one-out analyses examined the potential impact of excluding any IVs on the MR estimates. In the leave-one-out plots, the P value for the overall analysis remained below .05 after omitting each SNP, suggesting that no single SNP is disproportionately influencing the results. These methods collectively ensured the sensitivity and stability of the results.

To address multiple testing, we used Bonferroni correction to adjust the P value for various immunophenotypes (P ≤ .05/43 for monocytes, P ≤ .05/190 for B cells, P ≤ .05/64 for cDCs, P ≤ .05/64 for myeloid cells, P ≤ .05/124 for TBNK cells, P ≤ .05/79 for maturation stages of T cells, and P ≤ .05/167 for Treg cells). Causal associations that stayed significant after Bonferroni correction were considered as strong evidence, showing robust significance.

RESULTS

Causal effects between immunophenotypes and IgAN

SNPs were finally selected for IVs based on established filtering procedures. The basic information about the IVs and the corresponding F statistics are shown in Supplementary Table 2. As a result, 48 immune cell phenotypes were found to be suggestively associated with IgAN according to IVW methods, as detailed in Supplementary Table 3. Owing to inconsistent effect directions across methods, nine immune phenotypes were excluded. Besides, significant heterogeneity was observed in CD40 expression on CD14+ CD16+ monocytes (Cochran's Q P = .030, WM = .085) and in the percentage of CD33dim HLA DR+ CD11b+ within CD33dim HLA DR+ myeloid cell population (Cochran's Q P = .040, WM = .001). The latter was retained, considering it suggestively significant in the WM results. No significant horizontal pleiotropy was detected in sensitivity analyses (Supplementary Figs 13).

Finally, 38 immunophenotypes were found to be suggestively involved in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Among them, 20 immunophenotypes act as risk factors, while 18 immunophenotypes provide protective effects against IgAN (Fig. 2a). Notably, four immunophenotypes that exert risk effects for IgAN passed the multiple test adjustments of Bonferroni correction: the percentage of CD25hi among T cells (P  IVW = 2.782 × 10−5, ORIVW = 1.324, 95%CIIVW = 1.161–1.509) in the Treg panel, the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg among T cells (PIVW = 3.132 × 10−5, OR IVW = 1.205, 95%CI IVW = 1.104–1.316) in the Treg panel, the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg within CD4+ T cell population (PIVW = 1.361 × 10−4, OR IVW = 1.193, 95%CI IVW = 1.090–1.307) in the Treg panel, and CX3CR1 expression on monocytes (PIVW = 8.339 × 10−4, OR IVW = 1.170, 95%CI IVW = 1.067–1.283) in the monocyte panel. Additionally, two immunophenotypes that passed Bonferroni correction exert protective effects against IgAN: CD40 expression on monocytes (P  IVW = 3.134 × 10−4, OR IVW = 0.897, 95%CI = 0.846–0.952) in the monocyte panel and CD64 expression on CD14+ CD16 monocytes (P  IVW = 5.898 × 10−4, OR IVW = 0.841, 95%CI IVW = 0.762–0.928) in the monocyte panel (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Forest plot and volcano plot indicating IVW analysis results of IgAN. (a) Forest plot demonstrating immunophenotypes with a positive causal relationship with IgAN. Beta = ln (OR), expressing as change in ln (OR) of outcome per each additional SD unit of exposure. (b) Volcano plots depicting causal associations of 731 immunophenotypes with IgAN. nSNP, number of SNPs; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Next the causal relationships between immunophenotypes and IgAN were validated in an independent cohort (Supplementary Table 4, Fig. 3a). Five immunophenotypes, which refer to the same subtypes or the same marker and exhibit the same direction, were validated for their causal associations with IgAN (Fig. 3b). Notably, CD3 expression on effector memory CD4+ T cell (P  IVW = 3.524 × 10−4, ORIVW = 1.044, 95%CIIVW = 1.020–1.069), representing the enhanced function of effector memory CD4+ T cells, validated the immunophenotypes of the percentage of CD25hi among T cells, the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg among T cells and the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg within CD4+ T cell population. These immunophenotypes are mainly composed of Th1, Th2, and Th17 effector memory cells, and the results confirm that effector memory T cells are a risk factor for IgAN.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Forest plot and volcano plot indicating IVW analysis results of IgAN validation. (a) Forest plot demonstrating immunophenotypes with a positive causal relationship with IgAN validation. Beta = ln (OR), expressing as change in ln (OR) of outcome per each additional SD unit of exposure. (b) Volcano plots depicting causal associations of 731 immunophenotypes with IgAN validation. nSNP, number of SNPs; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Furthermore, we reversed MR analysis to explore whether there was reverse causality between IgAN and the remaining 38 immune cell phenotypes, which resulted in no significant causal effects.

Causal effects between immunophenotypes and MN

A total of 33 immune cell phenotypes with suggestive IVW results showed potential associations with MN (Supplementary Table 5). Eight immune cell phenotypes were excluded due to inconsistent trends in analytical results. The remaining immune cell phenotypes were free of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy (Supplementary Figs 46). The final screening identified 25 immune phenotypes, of which eight were risk factors for MN and 17 were protective against MN (Fig. 4a). However, none of the phenotypes passed the threshold after Bonferroni multiple test correction (Fig. 4b).

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Forest plot and volcano plot indicating IVW analysis results of MN. (a) Forest plot demonstrating immunophenotypes with a positive causal relationship with MN. Beta = ln (OR), expressing as change in ln (OR) of outcome per each additional SD unit of exposure. (b) Volcano plots depicting causal associations of 731 immunophenotypes with MN. nSNP, number of SNPs; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Subsequently, reverse MR of the remaining 25 immune cell phenotype did not reveal the existence of significant reverse causality for MN.

Causal effect between immunophenotypes and NS

A total of 25 immune cell phenotypes with suggestive IVW results showed potential associations with NS (Supplementary Table 6). The percentage of CD39+ CD8bright within CD8bright T cells (Treg panel); BAFF-R expression on IgD+ (B cell panel) and CD27 expression on IgD CD38dim (B cell panel) were removed due to inconsistent effect directions. No significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was detected in sensitivity analyses of the remaining immune cell phenotypes (Supplementary Figs 79). The final screen identified 22 immune phenotypes, of which 10 were risk factors for NS and 12 were protective against NS (Fig. 5a). None of the phenotypes passed the threshold after Bonferroni multiple test correction (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

Forest plot and volcano plot indicating IVW analysis results of NS. (a) Forest plot demonstrating immunophenotypes with a positive causal relationship with NS. Beta = ln (OR), expressing as change in ln (OR) of outcome per each additional SD unit of exposure. (b) Volcano plots depicting causal associations of 731 immunophenotypes with NS. nSNP, number of SNPs; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Afterward, reverse MR analysis suggested that no significant reverse causal relationship existed between the remaining 22 immune cell phenotypes and NS.

Causal analysis of immunophenotypes and PGDs

To explore the immunophenotypes most likely to influence PGDs, we intersected those demonstrating suggestive associations with IgAN, MN, and NS, and constructed Venn diagrams (Fig. 6). BAFF-R expression on IgD+ CD38 unswitched memory B cells (IVWIgAN = 0.001, ORIgAN = 0.892; IVWMN = 0.032, ORMN = 0.891) in the B cells panel and the percentage of CD33dim HLA DR+ CD11b+ within the CD33dim HLA DR+ myeloid cell population (IVWIgAN = 0.014, ORIgAN = 0.903; IVWMN = 0.034, ORMN = 0.899) in the myeloid cell panel had causal relationships with protective effects for both IgAN and MN without heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. CD40 expression on monocytes (IVWIgAN = 3.134 × 10−4, ORIgAN = 0.897; IVWNS = 0.039, ORNS = 1.052) in the monocyte panel, the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg within the CD4+ T cell population (IVWIgAN = 1.361 × 10−4, ORIgAN = 1.193; IVWNS = 0.046, ORNS = 1.087) in the Treg panel, and absolute counts of CD45RA+ CD28 CD8bright (IVWIgAN = 0.048, IVWNS = 0.031, ORIgAN = 1.000, ORNS = 1.000) in the Treg panel exhibited positively causal associations with IgAN and NS without heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. However, the actual risk or protective effects of absolute counts of CD45RA+ CD28 CD8bright had no clinical significance. Notably, CD40 expression on monocytes had a different impact on IgAN and NS. CD3 expression on CD28+ DN (CD4CD8 double negative) (IVWMN = 0.034, ORMN = 1.217; IVWNS = 0.023, ORNS = 1.129) in the Treg panel showed causal relationships, and is a risk factor for both NS and MN without heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy.

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

Venn diagram indicating common immunophenotypes across PGDs.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the causal relationship between immune cell phenotypes and PGDs using MR analysis. Although Shu et al. have investigated the causal roles of immune cell phenotypes in IgAN, the original IgAN GWAS data used are not the most suitable for MR analysis due to the insufficient sample size (592 IgA nephropathy cases), which limits the power for causal characterization [24]. Therefore, our study employed the largest and most up-to-date PGDs GWAS studies to investigate the shared and distinct genetic contributions of immune cell phenotypes to PGDs.

Through a series of MR analyses following strict criteria, we pinpointed immunophenotypes in cDCs, Tregs, B cells, TBNK, maturation stages of T cells, myeloid cells, and monocytes, which were suggestively correlated with PGDs (IgAN = 38, IgAN validation = 25, MN = 25, NS = 22). However, only the causal immunophenotype associations with IgAN reached the Bonferroni adjusted significance, which indicated that immune cells play the most crucial role in the pathogenesis of IgAN in PDGs.

A total of six immunophenotypes demonstrated significant causality for IgAN. Among these, three belong to the Treg panel (the percentage of CD25hi among T cells, the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg among T cells, and the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg within CD4+ T cell population), and three belong to the monocyte panel (CD40 expression on monocytes, CD64 expression on CD14+ CD16 monocytes, and CX3CR1 expression on monocytes). The subsequent validation study, which resulted in the identification of CD3 expression on effector memory CD4+ T cells, further confirmed the predisposing risk role of effector memory T cells in the development of IgAN.

The CD25hi cell population can be divided into Treg and non-Treg cell populations based on CD127 expression, with CD127hi occupying a dominant position [12, 25]. CD4+ CD25hi CD127hi cells are predominantly effector memory T cells, with immunophenotypes of CD25hi CD45RA CD4+ not Treg, including Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells [25–27]. Additionally, CD3, an essential T cell marker, forms a non-covalently bound TCR–CD3 complex with the T cell receptor (TCR), which activates the adaptive immune response by binding to peptide-major histocompatibility complex molecules on antigen-presenting cells. This interaction drives T cell proliferation and the production and secretion of effector molecules critical for T cell-mediated immunity [28–30]. Studies demonstrate elevated percentages of effector memory CD4+ T lymphocytes (Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells) in IgAN patients compared to healthy controls [27, 31]. Experiments with lymphocytes from IgAN patients have proved that Th2 cells promote hypogalactosylation of IgA, acting as a risk factor for IgAN. Additionally, Th17 cells produce IL-17, which induces hypermethylation of CpG islands in the C1GALT1C1 gene promoter, leading to the downregulation of C1GALT1C1 mRNA and increased secretion of aberrantly glycosylated IgA1 from B cells [32, 33].

Notably, CD25 (IL-2Rα), which forms the high-affinity IL-2 receptor complex, may serve as an attractive novel target for IgAN therapy based on genetic insights from our research. Currently, tacrolimus has been widely used in the treatment of IgAN by indirectly inhibiting IL-2 production through the suppression of calcineurin activity and the subsequent blocking of NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells)-dependent IL-2 transcription. Given this, we propose that monoclonal antibodies directly targeting CD25 could potentially be effective in treating IgAN. Basiliximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD25, is currently used in organ transplantation to reduce T cell activity. Studies have shown that Basiliximab effectively reduces IgAN recurrence after kidney transplantation and treats refractory autoimmune encephalitis [34, 35]. Although no studies have specifically explored the direct use of Basiliximab in IgAN treatment, we suggest that it could be a promising therapeutic option for IgAN.

Additionally, the significant immunophenotypes of CD40, CX3CR1 expression on monocytes, and CD64 expression on CD14+ CD16 monocytes indicates the vital role of monocytes in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Individuals with genetically elevated levels of CD40 expression on monocyte have a significantly lower risk of developing IgAN. According to Orrù’s study, CD40 expression on monocytes acts as a protective factor, and activating CD40 may be effective in treating several autoimmune diseases, such as Crohn's Disease, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Kawasaki disease [12]. Increasing evidence also shows that CD40 activation is promising in cancer immunotherapy, leading to the development and clinical trials of CD40 agonists. Selicrelumab, the most studied CD40 agonist, has shown initial efficacy in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in phase I trials [36, 37]. These findings suggest that CD40 agonists, like Selicrelumab, may also have therapeutic potential in IgAN and other autoimmune diseases from a genetic perspective.

Besides, we found that elevated CD64 expression on CD14+ CD16 monocytes serves as a protective factor against IgAN. Classical monocytes, expressing CD14+ and CD16, represent ∼80%–85% of total monocytes, which undergo phagocytosis within tissues and are involved in the clearance of immune complexes [38, 39]. CD64, the only high-affinity IgG receptor in humans, is primarily expressed on monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils [40]. By binding to the Fc region of IgG, CD64 enhances the phagocytosis of immune complexes by monocytes, including Kupffer cells, which play a predominant role in clearing IgA-containing immune complexes [41, 42]. Conversely, elevated CX3CR1 expression on monocytes is a risk factor for IgAN. CX3CR1, abundant on monocytes and macrophages, promotes adhesion and recruitment of monocytes, and is a marker for TGF-β production, a profibrotic mediator [43]. The CX3CR1-fractalkine axis has been linked to worsening hematuria, serum creatinine levels, and 24-hour urine protein levels in IgAN [44, 45]. Anti-CX3CR1 antibody treatment has shown significant reduction in glomeruli leukocyte filtration and prevention of crescent formation, suggesting that CX3CR1 exacerbates inflammation and fibrosis [46]. This evidence demonstrates that the role of monocytes in the pathogenesis of IgAN is complex, with different monocyte phenotypes having distinct effects on IgAN.

In this study, no immunophenotypes showed significant causal associations for MN and NS after applying Bonferroni correction. We consider that there are two potential reasons. First, the sample size of IgAN for the original GWAS is substantially larger than that of MN and NS, which enhances the significance, accuracy, and reliability of causal relationships [47]. Second, these results might reflect the fact that immune dysregulation is a more critical initiating factor for IgAN in terms of pathophysiology. Therefore, large-scale GWAS of PGDs, especially in MN and NS, through widespread collaborations to identify more associations and exploratory studies on immunophenotypes are needed to further explore the causal associations between immunophenotypes and PGDs.

Despite that no immunophenotypes demonstrated significant causal associations with MN and NS, we proceeded to explore common immune factors for PGDs by utilizing the suggestive immunophenotypes and constructing a Venn diagram. Four immunophenotypes play similar roles in PGDs (BAFF-R expression on IgD+ CD38 unswitched memory B cells and the percentage of CD33dim HLA DR+ CD11b+ within CD33dim HLA DR+ myeloid cell population for IgAN and MN; the percentage of CD25hi CD45RA CD4 not Treg within CD4+ T cell population for NS and IgAN; CD3 expression on CD28+ DN for MN and IgAN), while one immune phenotype has opposite effects in PGD (CD40 expression on monocytes for IgAN and NS).

Previous studies have demonstrated that B cells play a significant role in the pathogenesis of PGDs [4, 8, 9]. We discovered that elevated levels of BAFF-R expression on IgD+ CD38 unswitched memory B cells exert a protective effect against IgAN and MN occurrence. BAFF-R is a critical marker for the pro-survival B cells by binding to BAFF, which activates several downstream pathways that regulate basic survival functions including protein synthesis and energy metabolism [48]. Recent studies have found that serum BAFF levels are increased in patients with IgAN and MN, which are associated with clinical and prognostic outcomes of the disease [49, 50]. However, our studies found that BAFF-R expressed on IgD+ CD38 unswitched memory B cells exerts a protective effect. Researchers found that unswitched memory B cells were negatively correlated with levels of autoantibodies, and that the elevated levels of BAFF-R improve the survival of this subset and enhance their protective effects [51, 52].

Interestingly, we observed the elevated of CD40 expression on monocytes has opposite causal effects on IgAN (protective) and NS (risk). Studies have shown that CD40 monocytes are a pro-inflammatory subset that induce the activation, proliferation, and cytokine production of CD4+ T cells [53]. Compared with other monocytes, CD40 monocytes express higher levels of inflammatory markers, thus enhancing the function of CD4+ T cells [54]. It seems that CD40 expression on monocytes appears to be a risk factor for IgAN and NS. However, as discussed earlier, CD40 monocytes are a protective factor for IgAN by eliminating IgA1 [55]. The results prove that the pathogenic role of IgA1 outweighs the inflammatory contributions in IgAN.

As for MN and NS, elevated CD3 expression on CD28+ DN (CD4CD8) is a risk factor. CD3 plays a significant role in T cell development and differentiation. The CD3–TCR complex serves as the initial signal for T cell activation, therefore an increase in CD3 indicates heightened T cell activity [29]. DN (CD4CD8) Tregs influence the immune system by secreting perforin and inducing cell apoptosis through the FAS–FASL pathway [56]. Numerous studies have shown that perforin induces the death of kidney cells and exacerbates kidney fibrosis [57, 58]. Although there is a lack of direct evidence on the causal association of DN Treg with MN and NS, we provide genetic evidence indicating that DN Treg is a risk factor for both diseases.

Despite its strengths, our studies also have some limitations. First, we used the standard P < 10−5 instead of P < 5 × 10−8 when immunophenotypes and NS were used as the exposure, which may introduce some bias and false positives. Additionally, our GWAS data were derived exclusively from European populations, making the finding not generalizable to other populations. Therefore, in the future, with validation in larger populations and additional SNP analysis, we can clarify the causal association of immunophenotypes on PGDs more clearly and identify them as biomarkers in risk prediction, early detection, and prevention strategies in clinical settings.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our studies have uncovered causal relationships between 731 immunophenotypes and PGDs. We present direct genetic evidence, highlighting the crucial roles of specific immune cell phenotypes in the pathogenesis of PGDs. Notably, effector memory T cells and monocyte markers such as CD40, CD64, and CX3CR1 play a significant part in IgAN. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Further experimentation and genetic investigations are imperative to understand the intricacies of PGDs. Additionally, our research offers invaluable immunological insights for PGDs, paving the way for future early clinical diagnosis and treatment approaches.

Supplementary Material

sfaf057_Supplemental_Files

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We extend our gratitude to the participants and investigators of the PGDs GWAS, immunophenotype GWAS, and GWAS Catalog project for making their data publicly available. Additionally, we would like to thank everyone involved in our study.

Contributor Information

Wenhao Tang, Department of Nephrology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Metabolism and Inflammatory Diseases, Chongqing, China.

Qiu Li, Department of Nephrology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Metabolism and Inflammatory Diseases, Chongqing, China.

Xueying Yang, Department of Nephrology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Metabolism and Inflammatory Diseases, Chongqing, China.

Haiping Yang, Department of Nephrology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Metabolism and Inflammatory Diseases, Chongqing, China.

FUNDING

This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (no. 2022YFC2705101), Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Research Project (grant no. 2023GGXM001), and Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine, and Chongqing Medical University (no. W0098).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization was done by X.Y. and W.T. Data curation, formal analysis, and visualization were the responsibility of W.T. and X.Y. Funding acquisition and supervision were done by H.Y. and Q.L. Investigation, methodology, and resources were organized by W.T. and X.Y. Project administration was done by X.Y., H.Y., and Q.L. Software was written by W.T. and X.Y. The original draft was written by W.T. Review and editing of the manuscript was done by X.Y., H.Y., and Q.L. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

All data for this study were sourced from previously published research and public databases, which were obtained with relevant participant consent and ethical approval.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Hricik  DE, Chung-Park  M, Sedor  JR.  Glomerulonephritis. N Engl J Med  1998;339:888–99. 10.1056/NEJM199809243391306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kalantar-Zadeh  K, Jafar  TH, Nitsch  D  et al.  Chronic kidney disease. Lancet  2021;398:786–802. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00519-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wyatt  RJ, Julian  BA.  IgA nephropathy. N Engl J Med  2013;368:2402–14. 10.1056/NEJMra1206793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stamellou  E, Seikrit  C, Tang  SCW  et al.  IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers  2023;9:67. 10.1038/s41572-023-00476-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cheung  CK, Barratt  J, Lafayette  R  et al.  Targeting APRIL in the treatment of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int  2024;106:806–18   10.1016/j.kint.2024.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lin  YC, Gau  TS, Jiang  ZH  et al.  Targeted therapy in glomerular diseases. J Formos Med Assoc  2024;123:149–58. 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gentile  M, Sanchez-Russo  L, Riella  LV  et al.  Immune abnormalities in IgA nephropathy. Clin Kidney J  2023;16:1059–70. 10.1093/ckj/sfad025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vivarelli  M, Gibson  K, Sinha  A  et al.  Childhood nephrotic syndrome. Lancet  2023;402:809–24. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01051-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ronco  P, Beck  L, Debiec  H  et al.  Membranous nephropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers  2021;7:69. 10.1038/s41572-021-00303-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Emdin  CA, Khera  AV, Kathiresan  S.  Mendelian randomization. JAMA  2017;318:1925–6. 10.1001/jama.2017.17219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tin  A, Köttgen  A.  Mendelian randomization analysis as a tool to gain insights into causes of diseases: a primer. J Am Soc Nephrol  2021;32:2400–7. 10.1681/ASN.2020121760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Orrù  V, Steri  M, Sidore  C  et al.  Complex genetic signatures in immune cells underlie autoimmunity and inform therapy. Nat Genet  2020;52:1036–45. 10.1038/s41588-020-0684-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kiryluk  K, Sanchez-Rodriguez  E, Zhou  XJ  et al.  Genome-wide association analyses define pathogenic signaling pathways and prioritize drug targets for IgA nephropathy. Nat Genet  2023;55:1091–105. 10.1038/s41588-023-01422-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sakaue  S, Kanai  M, Tanigawa  Y  et al.  A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes. Nat Genet  2021;53:1415–24. 10.1038/s41588-021-00931-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Xie  J, Liu  L, Mladkova  N  et al.  The genetic architecture of membranous nephropathy and its potential to improve non-invasive diagnosis. Nat Commun  2020;11:1600. 10.1038/s41467-020-15383-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Skrivankova  VW, Richmond  RC, Woolf  BAR  et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. BMJ  2021;375:n2233. 10.1136/bmj.n2233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wang  X, Cheng  H, Feng  M  et al.  Causality of genetically proxied immunophenotypes on cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol  2024;15:1344773. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1344773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Brion  MJ, Shakhbazov  K, Visscher  PM.  Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol  2013;42:1497–501. 10.1093/ije/dyt179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jiang  L, Li  JC, Tang  BS  et al.  Associations between gut microbiota and Parkinson disease: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis. Euro J Neurology  2023;30:3471–7. 10.1111/ene.15848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Burgess  S, Butterworth  A, Thompson  SG.  Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol  2013;37:658–65. 10.1002/gepi.21758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bowden  J, Davey Smith  G, Haycock  PC  et al.  Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol  2016;40:304–14. 10.1002/gepi.21965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bowden  J, Davey Smith  G, Burgess  S.  Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol  2015;44:512–25. 10.1093/ije/dyv080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Verbanck  M, Chen  CY, Neale  B  et al.  Publisher correction: Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet  2018;50:1196. 10.1038/s41588-018-0164-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Shu  J, Ge  Y, Wu  Y.  Causal role of immune cells in IgA nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study. Ren Fail  2024;46:2381593. 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2381593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Seddiki  N, Santner-Nanan  B, Martinson  J  et al.  Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med  2006;203:1693–700. 10.1084/jem.20060468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Narsale  A, Moya  R, Davies  JD.  Human CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(hi) cells and the Th1/Th2 phenotype. Clin Immunol  2018;188:103–12. 10.1016/j.clim.2018.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Esteve Cols  C, Graterol Torres  FA, Quirant Sánchez  B  et al.  Immunological pattern in IgA nephropathy. Int J Mol Sci  2020;21:1389. 10.3390/ijms21041389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Schamel  WW, Alarcon  B, Minguet  S.  The TCR is an allosterically regulated macromolecular machinery changing its conformation while working. Immunol Rev  2019;291:8–25. 10.1111/imr.12788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. van der Merwe  PA, Dushek  O.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering. Nat Rev Immunol  2011;11:47–55. 10.1038/nri2887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Smith-Garvin  JE, Koretzky  GA, Jordan  MS.  T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol.  2009;27:591–619. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ruszkowski  J, Lisowska  KA, Pindel  M  et al.  T cells in IgA nephropathy: role in pathogenesis, clinical significance and potential therapeutic target. Clin Exp Nephrol  2019;23:291–303. 10.1007/s10157-018-1665-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yang  L, Zhang  X, Peng  W  et al.  MicroRNA-155-induced T lymphocyte subgroup drifting in IgA nephropathy. Int Urol Nephrol  2017;49:353–61. 10.1007/s11255-016-1444-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sun  Q, Zhang  J, Zhou  N  et al.  DNA methylation in Cosmc promoter region and aberrantly glycosylated IgA1 associated with pediatric IgA nephropathy. PLoS ONE  2015;10:e0112305. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Bai  J, Wu  Q, Chen  J  et al.  Risk factors for recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Biomol Biomed  2023;23:364–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dinoto  A, Ferrari  S, Mariotto  S.  Treatment options in refractory autoimmune encephalitis. CNS Drugs  2022;36:919–31. 10.1007/s40263-022-00943-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zhou  Y, Richmond  A, Yan  C.  Harnessing the potential of CD40 agonism in cancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev  2024;75:40–56. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2023.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Byrne  KT, Betts  CB, Mick  R  et al.  Neoadjuvant selicrelumab, an agonist CD40 antibody, induces changes in the tumor microenvironment in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res  2021;27:4574–86. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bumbea  V, Ardelean  L, Radulescu  L  et al.  Proinflammatory role of monocytes in SARS-CoV-2 infection in chronic hemodialysis patients. Front Immunol  2023;14:1210961. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1210961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Clarkson  SB, Kimberly  RP, Valinsky  JE  et al.  Blockade of clearance of immune complexes by an anti-Fc gamma receptor monoclonal antibody. J Exp Med  1986;164:474–89. 10.1084/jem.164.2.474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mancardi  DA, Albanesi  M, Jönsson  F  et al.  The high-affinity human IgG receptor FcγRI (CD64) promotes IgG-mediated inflammation, anaphylaxis, and antitumor immunotherapy. Blood  2013;121:1563–73. 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Nimmerjahn  F, Ravetch  JV.  Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol  2008;8:34–47. 10.1038/nri2206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Chen  A, Yang  SS, Lin  TJ  et al.  IgA nephropathy: clearance kinetics of IgA-containing immune complexes. Semin Immunopathol  2018;40:539–43. 10.1007/s00281-018-0708-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Helmke  A, Nordlohne  J, Balzer  MS  et al.  CX3CL1-CX3CR1 interaction mediates macrophage-mesothelial cross talk and promotes peritoneal fibrosis. Kidney Int  2019;95:1405–17. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cox  SN, Sallustio  F, Serino  G  et al.  Activated innate immunity and the involvement of CX3CR1-fractalkine in promoting hematuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int  2012;82:548–60. 10.1038/ki.2012.147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Luo  R, Guo  SM, Li  YQ  et al.  Plasma fractalkine levels are associated with renal inflammation and outcomes in immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant  2019;34:1549–58. 10.1093/ndt/gfy169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Feng  L, Chen  S, Garcia  GE  et al.  Prevention of crescentic glomerulonephritis by immunoneutralization of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 rapid communication. Kidney Int  1999;56:612–20. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00604.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Visscher  PM, Wray  NR, Zhang  Q  et al.  10 Years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am Hum Genet  2017;101:5–22. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Smulski  CR, Eibel  H.  BAFF and BAFF-receptor in B cell selection and survival. Front Immunol  2018;9:2285. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Xin  G, Shi  W, Xu  LX  et al.  Serum BAFF is elevated in patients with IgA nephropathy and associated with clinical and histopathological features. J Nephrol  2013;26:683–90. 10.5301/jn.5000218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Han  SS, Yang  SH, Jo  HA  et al.  BAFF and APRIL expression as an autoimmune signature of membranous nephropathy. Oncotarget  2018;9:3292–302. 10.18632/oncotarget.23232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Castleman  MJ, Santos  AL, Lesteberg  KE  et al.  Activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production by unswitched memory B cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front Immunol  2023;14:1213344. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1213344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Vincent  FB, Saulep-Easton  D, Figgett  WA  et al.  The BAFF/APRIL system: emerging functions beyond B cell biology and autoimmunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev  2013;24:203–15. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Karnell  JL, Rieder  SA, Ettinger  R  et al.  Targeting the CD40-CD40L pathway in autoimmune diseases: humoral immunity and beyond. Adv Drug Deliv Rev  2019;141:92–103. 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Yang  J, Fang  P, Yu  D  et al.  Chronic kidney disease induces inflammatory CD40+ monocyte differentiation via homocysteine elevation and DNA hypomethylation. Circ Res  2016;119:1226–41. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Rifai  A, Mannik  M.  Clearance of circulating IgA immune complexes is mediated by a specific receptor on Kupffer cells in mice. J Exp Med  1984;160:125–37. 10.1084/jem.160.1.125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ligocki  AJ, Niederkorn  JY.  Advances on Non-CD4 + Foxp3+ T regulatory cells: CD8+, Type 1, and double negative T regulatory cells in organ transplantation. Transplantation  2015;99:1553–9. 10.1097/TP.0000000000000813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Sharma  VK, Bologa  RM, Li  B  et al.  Molecular executors of cell death—differential intrarenal expression of Fas ligand, Fas, granzyme B, and perforin during acute and/or chronic rejection of human renal allografts. Transplantation  1996;62:1860–6. 10.1097/00007890-199612270-00031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Hao  J, Huang  X, Guan  J  et al.  Shenkang injection protects against renal fibrosis by reducing perforin expression through the STING/TBK1/IRF3 signaling pathways in natural killer cells. Phytomedicine  2022;104:154206. 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sfaf057_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Clinical Kidney Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES