Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1986 Mar;372:485–500. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016021

Reinnervation of the lateral gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the rat by their common nerve.

M J Gillespie, T Gordon, P R Murphy
PMCID: PMC1192775  PMID: 3723414

Abstract

To determine whether there is any specificity of regenerating nerves for their original muscles, the common lateral gastrocnemius soleus nerve (l.g.s.) innervating the fast-twitch lateral gastrocnemius (l.g.) and slow-twitch soleus muscles was sectioned in the hind limb of twenty adult rats. The proximal nerve stump was sutured to the dorsal surface of the l.g. muscle and 4-14 months later, the contractile properties of the reinnervated l.g. and soleus muscles and their single motor units were studied by dissection and stimulation of the ventral root filaments. Contractile properties of normal contralateral muscles were examined for comparison and motor units were isolated in l.g. and soleus muscles for study in a group of untreated animals. Measurement of time and rate parameters of maximal twitch and tetanic contractions showed that the rate of development of force increased significantly in reinnervated soleus muscles and approached the speed of l.g. muscles but rate of relaxation did not change appreciably. In reinnervated l.g. muscles, contraction speed was similar to normal l.g. muscles but relaxation rate declined toward the rates of relaxation in control soleus muscles. After reinnervation by the common l.g.s. nerve, the proportion of slow motor units in l.g. increased from 10 to 31% and decreased in soleus from 80 to 31%. The relative proportions of fast and slow motor units in each muscle were the same as the proportions of fast and slow units in the normal l.g. and soleus muscles combined. It was concluded that fast and slow muscles do not show any preference for their former nerves and that the change in the force profile of the reinnervated muscles is indicative of the relative proportions of fast and slow motor units: fast units dominate the contraction phase and slow units the relaxation phase of twitch and tetanic contractions of the muscle.

Full text

PDF
485

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNSTEIN J. J., GUTH L. Nonselectivity in establishment of neuromuscular connections following nerve regeneration in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1961 Sep;4:262–275. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(61)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BULLER A. J., ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M. Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses. J Physiol. 1960 Feb;150:417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BULLER A. J., LEWIS D. M. FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON MAMMALIAN CROSS-INNERVATED SKELETAL MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:343–358. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke R. E., Levine D. N., Tsairis P., Zajac F. E., 3rd Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):723–748. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan A. K., Edgerton V. R., Goslow G. E., Jr, Kurata H., Rasmussen S. A., Spector S. A. Histochemical and physiological properties of cat motor units after self-and cross-reinnervation. J Physiol. 1982 Nov;332:343–361. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Close R. Dynamic properties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat after nerve cross-union. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):331–346. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Close R. Properties of motor units in fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(1):45–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dhoot G. K., Perry S. V., Vrbova G. Changes in the distribution of the components of the troponin complex in muscle fibers after cross-innervation. Exp Neurol. 1981 Jun;72(3):513–530. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(81)90001-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubowitz V. Cross-innervated mammalian skeletal muscle: histochemical, physiological and biochemical observations. J Physiol. 1967 Dec;193(3):481–496.3. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleshman J. W., Munson J. B., Sypert G. W., Friedman W. A. Rheobase, input resistance, and motor-unit type in medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1326–1338. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frank E., Jansen J. K., Lomo T., Westgaard R. H. The interaction between foreign and original motor nerves innervating the soleus muscle of rats. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;247(3):725–743. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon T., Stein R. B. Reorganization of motor-unit properties in reinnervated muscles of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Nov;48(5):1175–1190. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.5.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gordon T., Stein R. B. Temperature effects on the kinetics of force generation in normal and dystrophic mouse muscles. Exp Neurol. 1985 Aug;89(2):348–360. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(85)90095-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon T., Stein R. B. Time course and extent of recovery in reinnervated motor units of cat triceps surae muscles. J Physiol. 1982 Feb;323:307–323. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gutmann E., Hanzlíková V. Effects of accessory nerve supply to muscle achieved by implantation into muscle during regeneration of its nerve. Physiol Bohemoslov. 1967;16(3):244–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutmann E., Young J. Z. The re-innervation of muscle after various periods of atrophy. J Anat. 1944 Jan;78(Pt 1-2):15–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoh J. F. Selective and non-selective reinnervation of fast-twitch and slow-twitch rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(3):791–801. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ip M. C., Vrbová G. Reinnervation of the soleus muscle by its own or by an alien nerve. Neuroscience. 1983 Dec;10(4):1463–1469. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90127-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karpati G., Engel W. K. "Type grouping" in skeletal muscles after experimental reinnervation. Neurology. 1968 May;18(5):447–455. doi: 10.1212/wnl.18.5.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kugelberg E., Edström L., Abbruzzese M. Mapping of motor units in experimentally reinnervated rat muscle. Interpretation of histochemical and atrophic fibre patterns in neurogenic lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970 Jun;33(3):319–329. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.33.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, contraction speed and fatiguability of rat soleus motor units. J Neurol Sci. 1973 Oct;20(2):177–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(73)90029-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Landmesser L. T. The generation of neuromuscular specificity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1980;3:279–302. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.03.030180.001431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miledi R., Stefani E. Non-selective re-innervation of slow and fast muscle fibres in the rat. Nature. 1969 May 10;222(5193):569–571. doi: 10.1038/222569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robbins N., Karpati G., Engel W. K. Histochemical and contractile properties in the cross-innervated guinea pig soleus muscle. Arch Neurol. 1969 Mar;20(3):318–329. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1969.00480090106015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanes J. R., Marshall L. M., McMahan U. J. Reinnervation of muscle fiber basal lamina after removal of myofibers. Differentiation of regenerating axons at original synaptic sites. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jul;78(1):176–198. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.1.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sréter F. A., Luff A. R., Gergely J. Effect of cross-reinnervation on physiological parameters and on properties of myosin and sarcoplasmic reticulum of fast and slow muscles of the rabbit. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Dec;66(6):811–821. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.6.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stein R. B., Gordon T., Shriver J. Temperature dependence of mammalian muscle contractions and ATPase activities. Biophys J. 1982 Nov;40(2):97–107. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84464-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yellin H. Neural regulation of enzymes in muscle fibers of red and white muscle. Exp Neurol. 1967 Sep;19(1):92–103. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(67)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. de Medinaceli L., Freed W. J. Peripheral nerve reconnection: immediate histologic consequences of distributed mechanical support. Exp Neurol. 1983 Aug;81(2):459–468. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90275-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. de Medinaceli L., Freed W. J., Wyatt R. J. Peripheral nerve reconnection: improvement of long-term functional effects under simulated clinical conditions in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1983 Aug;81(2):488–496. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(83)90277-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES