Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1985 Jun;363:211–225. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015705

Lack of nicotinic supersensitivity in frog sympathetic neurones following denervation.

P M Dunn, L M Marshall
PMCID: PMC1192924  PMID: 3874957

Abstract

The sensitivity of bull-frog sympathetic neurones to nicotinic, cholinergic agonists has been studied in both normal (control) and surgically denervated ganglia. Using gross extracellular recording, the sensitivity to acetylcholine (ACh) increased 18-fold following denervation, while that to carbachol (CCh) was unchanged. Normal ganglia showed a similar sensitivity increase after inhibition of cholinesterase. This suggests that the rise in ACh sensitivity is due to reduced cholinesterase activity, not to true supersensitivity. There was no significant difference in resting membrane potential or input resistance between normal and denervated neurones. Neurones denervated for 7-50 days showed no significant change in sensitivity to ACh or CCh applied iontophoretically at a distance of 10 micron from the cell surface. In control ganglia, localized iontophoretic application of ACh revealed an uneven distribution of sensitivity which is attributed to the localization of receptors to synaptic areas. Fourteen days after denervation, the geometric mean sensitivity to focally applied ACh was not significantly different from that found in control ganglia. The variation in sensitivity to focally applied ACh at randomly chosen sites on denervated neurones was as great as that found in control ganglia. It is concluded that denervation does not cause frog sympathetic neurones to become supersensitive to ACh. The apparent increase in nicotinic ACh sensitivity observed using extracellular recording from whole ganglia is due not to a change in the number or distribution of ACh receptors, but to a decrease in cholinesterase activity.

Full text

PDF
211

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMBACHE N., PERRY W. L., ROBERTSON P. A. The effect of muscarine on perfused superior cervical ganglia of cats. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1956 Dec;11(4):442–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1956.tb00014.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bird S. J., Aghajanian G. K. Denervation supersensitivity in the cholinergic septo-hippocampal pathway: a microiontophoretic study. Brain Res. 1975 Dec 19;100(2):355–370. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90488-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown D. A. Responses of normal and denervated cat superior cervical ganglia to some stimulant compounds. J Physiol. 1969 Mar;201(1):225–236. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHIEN S. Supersensitivity of denervated superior cervical ganglion to acetylcholine. Am J Physiol. 1960 May;198:949–954. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.198.5.949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deak I. I. Demonstration of sensory neurones in the ectopic cuticle of spineless-aristapedia, a homoeotic mutant of Drosophila. Nature. 1976 Mar 18;260(5548):252–254. doi: 10.1038/260252a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dennis M. J., Sargent P. B. Loss of extrasynaptic acetylcholine sensitivity upon reinnervation of parasympathetic ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:263–275. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dodd J., Horn J. P. A reclassification of B and C neurones in the ninth and tenth paravertebral sympathetic ganglia of the bullfrog. J Physiol. 1983 Jan;334:255–269. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dun N., Nishi S., Karczmar A. G. Alteration in nicotinic and muscarinic responses of rabbit superior cervical ganglion cells after chronic preganglionic denervation. Neuropharmacology. 1976 Apr;15(4):211–218. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(76)90066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fambrough D. M. Acetylcholine receptors. Revised estimates of extrajunctional receptor density in denervated rat diaphragm. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Oct;64(4):468–472. doi: 10.1085/jgp.64.4.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fambrough D. M. Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1979 Jan;59(1):165–227. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frank E. The sensitivity to glutamate of denervated muscles of the crayfish. J Physiol. 1974 Oct;242(2):371–382. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Green R. D., 3rd The effect of denervation on the sensitivity of the superior cervical ganglion of the pithed cat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969 May;167(1):143–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guth L. "Trophic" influences of nerve on muscle. Physiol Rev. 1968 Oct;48(4):645–687. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1968.48.4.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HUNT C. C., NELSON P. G. STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL CHANGES IN THE FROG SYMPATHETIC GANGLION FOLLOWING CUTTING OF THE PRESYNAPTIC NERVE FIBRES. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:1–20. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harris A. J., Kuffler S. W., Dennis M. J. Differential chemosensitivity of synaptic and extrasynaptic areas on the neuronal surface membrane in parasympathetic neurons of the frog, tested by microapplication of acetylcholine. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Apr 27;177(1049):541–553. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1971.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuffler S. W., Dennis M. J., Harris A. J. The development of chemosensitivity in extrasynaptic areas of the neuronal surface after denervation of parasympathetic ganglion cells in the heart of the frog. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Apr 27;177(1049):555–563. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1971.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuffler S. W. Slow synaptic responses in autonomic ganglia and the pursuit of a peptidergic transmitter. J Exp Biol. 1980 Dec;89:257–286. doi: 10.1242/jeb.89.1.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity at the post-synaptic membrane of vertebrate skeletal twitch muscles: iontophoretic mapping in the micron range. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(3):703–730. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Langley J. N., Orbeli L. A. Observations on the sympathetic and sacral autonomic system of the frog. J Physiol. 1910 Dec 31;41(5):450–482. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1910.sp001412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MacDermott A. B., Connor E. A., Dionne V. E., Parsons R. L. Voltage clamp study of fast excitatory synaptic currents in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Jan;75(1):39–60. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marshall L. M. Synaptic localization of alpha-bungarotoxin binding which blocks nicotinic transmission at frog sympathetic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1948–1952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McConnell M. G., Simpson L. L. The role of acetylcholine receptors and acetylcholinesterase activity in the development of denervation supersensitivity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976 Sep;198(3):507–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McMahan U. J., Kuffler S. W. Visual identification of synaptic boutons on living ganglion cells and of varicosities in postganglionic axons in the heart of the frog. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Apr 27;177(1049):485–508. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1971.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. PERRY W. L., REINERT H. The effects of preganglionic denervation on the reactions of ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1954 Oct 28;126(1):101–115. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. PICK J. Sympathectomy in amphibians; anatomical considerations. J Comp Neurol. 1957 Apr;107(2):169–207. doi: 10.1002/cne.901070202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Purves D., Lichtman J. W. Formation and maintenance of synaptic connections in autonomic ganglia. Physiol Rev. 1978 Oct;58(4):821–862. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.4.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roper S. The acetylcholine sensitivity of the surface membrane of multiply-innervated parasympathetic ganglion cells in the mudpuppy before and after partial denervation. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):455–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Salafsky B., Bell J., Prewitt M. A. Development of fibrillation potentials in denervated fast and slow skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1968 Sep;215(3):637–643. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.215.3.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. THESLEFF S. Effects of motor innervation on the chemical sensitivity of skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1960 Oct;40:734–752. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1960.40.4.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. VOLLE R. L., KOELLE G. B. The physiological role of acetyl-cholinesterase (AChE) in sympathetic ganglia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1961 Aug;133:223–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weitsen H. A., Weight F. F. Synaptic innervation of sympathetic ganglion cells in the bullfrog. Brain Res. 1977 Jun 10;128(2):197–211. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90988-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES