How do proteins, DNA, and RNA fold? This question has remained one of the most fascinating one in Biology and Chemistry. Research in folding addresses three major questions: Given a primary sequence, what is the final structure of a protein, a DNA, or an RNA in their folded state? Some say that alphafold has solved this issue, at least for protein folding. The other two questions remain open: The first involves the question of how cells balance the equilibrium between benign folding and aberrant folding, leading to misfolded, aggregated states. Misfolded protein states are known as causative agents inducing not only neurodegenerative diseases but also diabetes type II; they accumulate in an aging society. The second question is linked to the first and is concerned with the rates of folding. These rates are typically determined in sophisticated biophysical experiments. But these in vitro folding rates are often too slow and not consistent with the cellular needs for rapid turn-over of biomolecular folds. In many cellular machineries, proteins and RNAs have to fold for a short period of time, but then need to unfold or refold. In cells, these rates are often faster than those determined for the isolated systems. In fact, various protein chaperones have been identified that solve both questions: Protein chaperones are known to help proteins to avoid misfolding. The necessity to prevent misfolded species has also been reported for RNA, and consequently, RNA chaperones, e.g., RNA helicases have been found. In addition, protein chaperones are known to accelerate the unfolding of double-stranded RNA and other sophisticated RNA and DNA structures. Again, helper proteins help complicated RNAs and DNAs to (re)fold. Huang et al. now extend this repertoire of chaperones: They show that G- quadruplexes, a special form of DNA and RNA, can help proteins to fold properly. Their findings reverse the role of the chaperone helper and the system that needs help. DNA G4s help out proteins, a finding that adds a new cellular function to DNA and presumably also for RNA (1). The findings of Huang et al. open up a new understanding of the role of RNA and DNA quadruplex structures in cells. During translation, the coding messenger RNA can form RNA G4 prior to being read-off by the ribosome or after translation. Up to now, such RNA G4 formation was considered to function as roadblock, inhibiting protein translation and leading to premature translation abortion but not as chaperones to promote protein folding.
What is special about RNA and DNA quadruplexes? Within the diversity of biomolecular structures, RNA and DNA guanosine quadruplexes (G4) stand out as structures that form by pairing of four strands of guanosine- or deoxyguanosine-rich strands, respectively. Thus, G-quadruplexes (G4s) are noncanonical RNA/DNA structures that contain nucleobase tetrads stabilized by Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds. At least two tetrads stack onto each other, and monovalent cations including K+ or Na+ can bind between the tetrad in the center of the tetrad (2, 3). DNA G4s are found in genomic regions (4), including telomeres (5, 6), oncogene promoters (7–10), and replication origins. Their function includes transcriptional regulation (11, 12), genome stability (13), and replication (14). DNA G4s exhibit structural polymorphism with diverse topologies influenced by sequence (15–18) and cation (19) type due to their complex folding energy landscapes (20).
The findings of Huang et al. open up a new understanding of the role of RNA and DNA quadruplex structures in cells.
The work reported here builds on previous work (21, 22) that had already documented the general chaperoning role of G4. The work published in this edition of the Proceedings provides a kinetic mechanistic understanding of the phenomenon by characterizing the effect of DNA G4 with different topologies to the kinetics of folding of a model protein. Determining the changes in kinetics allows deciphering the impact of G4 on the protein folding landscape. The work stands out due to the clever design of different DNA G4 and of the protein model system. The authors show that pending on the topology of the four stranded DNA G4 that adopt either parallel, antiparallel, or 3 + 1 hybrid strand topologies, different folding rates are observed (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, the parallel strand orientation accelerates the most, followed by the 3 + 1 hybrid strand topology. It is worth noting that RNA G4 also adopt a parallel topology. As protein, the authors chose the model protein TagRFP675 (21, 23). TagRFP675 has been shown to populate at least one fluorescent intermediate; thus, TagRFP675 is known to fold as a three state-folder. While the unfolded state of TagRFP675 is not fluorescent, the excitation/emission wavelengths of the intermediate (388/510 nm) and the folded state (598/675 nm) both have a large Stoke shift but differ substantially in their excitation and emission wavelengths. For proteins, various folding mechanisms are perceivable: With a single intermediate, a sequential folding pathway can be populated, in the case of two intermediates; the transient states I1 and I2 can be on- or off-pathway, branched or triangular. Given the high signal-to-noise of the fluorescence data, the experimental data can be compared to predictions that allow differentiation between different protein folding pathways. In the absence of the DNA G4 chaperone, two intermediates I1 and I2 accumulate along the folding pathway of TagRFP675. The off-pathway intermediate I2 interconverts with both, the unfolded state U and the on-pathway intermediate I1, but not with the native state N (Fig. 1B). The mechanism for TagRFG675 is similar but not identical to folding pathways detected, e.g., for the paradigm folding model proteins lysozyme and α-lactalbumin (24, 25).
Fig. 1.
(A) Schematic representation of possible G4 topologies and examples of corresponding DNA/RNA structures taken from PDB. (B) Modulation of the kinetic protein folding pathways by DNA G4. In the absence of G4, the model protein adopts a branched folding pathway, in which to intermediate I1 and I2 interact with the unfolded state U, but not with the native state N. G4 interacts with the unfolded state and stabilizes the on-pathway intermediate I1. This stabilization suppresses the formation of the off-pathway intermediate I2.
The authors then investigated the impact of the addition of the parallel G4 Seq 576 on the folding pathway of the model protein TagRFP675. They show that the triangular pathway is reduced to a sequential pathway populating the unfolded protein (U), the on-pathway intermediate I1, and the folded state N. The DNA G4 rapidly binds to the unfolded protein and stabilizes the transient G4-U and the G4-I1 complexes. From measuring the temperature dependence of folding, including the temperature dependence of Δcp, the authors can show that the acceleration of folding and unfolding by a factor of 5 is due to an increase in the enthalpic barrier that is small compared to the decrease in entropic barrier. For the acceleration of the transition from U to I1, the kinetics require a change in heat capacity.
As pointed out by the authors, with the new function identified here, also RNA G4, accumulating under stress, could help fold slow-folding proteins that have not been previously identified as clients for Hsp60. More thorough in-cell kinetic investigations will need to be conducted to further fill this new chapter for G4 DNA/RNA function. As often, finding function that can be assigned to RNAs or DNAs as opposed to be reserved for proteins only fuels into the concept of the RNA world that was capable of carrying out previously unknown function. Low complexity, G-rich RNAs and DNAs could act as chaperones before more complex protein complexes have evolved. It remains to be seen how much of this ancient function is still operational in more highly evolved cells.
Acknowledgments
Author contributions
H.S. and I.B. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
See companion article, “G-quadruplexes catalyze protein folding by reshaping the energetic landscape,” 10.1073/pnas.2414045122.
References
- 1.Huang Z., Ghosh K., Stull F., Horowitz S., G-quadruplexes catalyze protein folding by reshaping the energetic landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122, e2414045122 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gellert M., Lipsett M. N., Davies D. R., Helix formation by guanylic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48, 2013–2018 (1962). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pinnavaia T. J., Marshall C. L., Fisk C. L., Miles H. T., Becker E. D., Alkali metal ion specificity in the solution ordering of a nucleotide, 5’-guanosine monophosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 3625–3627 (1978). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huppert J. L., Balasubramanian S., Prevalence of quadruplexes in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2908–2916 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu Y., Komiyama M., G-quadruplexes in human telomere: Structures, properties, and applications. Molecules 29, 174 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xu Y., Chemistry in human telomere biology: Structure, function and targeting of telomere DNA/RNA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 2719 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eddy J., Maizels N., Gene function correlates with potential for G4 DNA formation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 3887–3896 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Phan A. T., Modi Y. S., Patel D. J., Propeller-type parallel-stranded G-quadruplexes in the human c-myc promoter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8710–8716 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Phan A. T., Kuryavyi V., Burge S., Neidle S., Patel D. J., Structure of an unprecedented G-quadruplex scaffold in the human c-kit promoter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 4386–4392 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Agrawal P., Hatzakis E., Guo K., Carver M., Yang D., Solution structure of the major G-quadruplex formed in the human VEGF promoter in K+: Insights into loop interactions of the parallel G-quadruplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 10584–10592 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siddiqui-Jain A., Grand C. L., Bearss D. J., Hurley L. H., Direct evidence for a G-quadruplex in a promoter region and its targeting with a small molecule to repress c- MYC transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 11593–11598 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cogoi S., Xodo L. E., G-quadruplex formation within the promoter of the KRAS proto-oncogene and its effect on transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 2536–2549 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pavlova A. V., Kubareva E. A., Monakhova M. V., Zvereva M. I., Dolinnaya N. G., Impact of G-quadruplexes on the regulation of genome integrity, DNA damage and repair. Biomolecules 11, 1284 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prorok P., et al. , Involvement of G-quadruplex regions in mammalian replication origin activity. Nat. Commun. 10, 3274 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grün J. T., et al. , Conformational dynamics of strand register shifts in DNA G-quadruplexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 264–273 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saha A., et al. , Nucleolin discriminates drastically between long-loop and short-loop quadruplexes. Biochemistry 59, 1261–1272 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pavc D., et al. , GC ends control topology of DNA G-quadruplexes and their cation-dependent assembly. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 2749–2761 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grün J. T., et al. , Unraveling the kinetics of spare-tire DNA G-quadruplex folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 6185–6193 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bhattacharyya D., Mirihana Arachchilage G., Basu S., Metal cations in G-Quadruplex folding and stability. Front. Chem. 4, 1–14 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Šponer J., et al. , Folding of guanine quadruplex molecules–funnel-like mechanism or kinetic partitioning? An overview from MD simulation studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1861, 1246–1263 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Son A., Huizar Cabral V., Huang Z., Litberg T. J., Horowitz S., G-quadruplexes rescuing protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2216308120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Begeman A., et al. , G-Quadruplexes act as sequence-dependent protein chaperones. EMBO Rep. 21, 1–15 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Piatkevich K. D., et al. , Extended stokes shift in fluorescent proteins: Chromophore-protein interactions in a near-infrared TagRFP675 variant. Sci. Rep. 3, 1847 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kiefhaber T., Kinetic traps in lysozyme folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 9029–9033 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schlepckow K., Wirmer J., Bachmann A., Kiefhaber T., Schwalbe H., Conserved folding pathways of α-lactalbumin and lysozyme revealed by kinetic CD, fluorescence, NMR, and interrupted refolding experiments. J. Mol. Biol. 378, 686–698 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

