Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
. 2025 Mar 2;19(1):wraf026. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wraf026

Atmospheric methane consumption in arid ecosystems acts as a reverse chimney and is accelerated by plant-methanotroph biomes

Nathalie A Delherbe 1, Oscar Gomez 2, Alvaro M Plominsky 3, Aaron Oliver 4, Maximino Manzanera 5, Marina G Kalyuzhnaya 6,
PMCID: PMC11931723  PMID: 40037293

Abstract

Drylands cover one-third of the Earth’s surface and are one of the largest terrestrial sinks for methane. Understanding the structure–function interplay between members of arid biomes can provide critical insights into mechanisms of resilience toward anthropogenic and climate-change-driven environmental stressors—water scarcity, heatwaves, and increased atmospheric greenhouse gases. This study integrates in situ measurements with culture-independent and enrichment-based investigations of methane-consuming microbiomes inhabiting soil in the Anza-Borrego Desert, a model arid ecosystem in Southern California, United States. The atmospheric methane consumption ranged between 2.26 and 12.73 μmol m2 h−1, peaking during the daytime at vegetated sites. Metagenomic studies revealed similar soil-microbiome compositions at vegetated and unvegetated sites, with Methylocaldum being the major methanotrophic clade. Eighty-four metagenome-assembled genomes were recovered, six represented by methanotrophic bacteria (three Methylocaldum, two Methylobacter, and uncultivated Methylococcaceae). The prevalence of copper-containing methane monooxygenases in metagenomic datasets suggests a diverse potential for methane oxidation in canonical methanotrophs and uncultivated Gammaproteobacteria. Five pure cultures of methanotrophic bacteria were obtained, including four Methylocaldum. Genomic analysis of Methylocaldum isolates and metagenome-assembled genomes revealed the presence of multiple stand-alone methane monooxygenase subunit C paralogs, which may have functions beyond methane oxidation. Furthermore, these methanotrophs have genetic signatures typically linked to symbiotic interactions with plants, including tryptophan synthesis and indole-3-acetic acid production. Based on in situ fluxes and soil microbiome compositions, we propose the existence of arid-soil reverse chimneys, an empowered methane sink represented by yet-to-be-defined cooperation between desert vegetation and methane-consuming microbiomes.

Keywords: methanotrophs, arid soil, desert microbiomes, Methylocaldum, plants, and methane cycle

Introduction

Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are the chemical footprint of natural and anthropogenic activities that accelerate climate change. Methane (CH4) is the second most abundant GHG, after carbon dioxide (CO2), constituting the most abundant reduced compound [1] and hydrocarbon [2] in our atmosphere. The global warming potential of CH4 is 84 times higher than CO2 over a period of 20 years [3]. Approximately 500–600 Tg (1Tg = 1012 g) of CH4 are emitted globally into the atmosphere every year from different natural and anthropogenic processes [4–9], posing an urgent need for worldwide mitigation efforts [10]. Biological CH4 emissions are driven by the interplay of two groups of organisms: CH4 producers (mostly methanogens) and CH4 consumers (often described as methanotrophs). The metabolic activities of these two functional microbial groups determine the net methane flux of ecosystems as a CH4 source (presenting net emissions) or sink (presenting a net uptake from the atmosphere) [4]. Soils are the major sinks of atmospheric CH4, consuming 30–42 Tg per year through the activity of methanotrophic bacteria [11–15]. CH4 uptake rates in soils—which vary significantly depending on the ecosystem—have declined in the past decades, mostly due to anthropogenic disturbances [16–18]. The CH4 consumption rates in dryland areas (which include semiarid, arid, and hyper-arid regions) have average annual consumption rates as high as 0.66 mg CH4 m−2 d−1 [19], which is comparable to that of grassland and forest soils (0.65 mg CH4 m−2 d−1 and 0.74–1.26 mg CH4 m−2 d−1, respectively) [20, 21]. The fact that dryland environments comprise roughly one-third of the land surface on Earth [22, 23] denotes the importance of studying these regions for correct modeling of the global CH4 budget. As dryland microbes contribute to global climate regulation through CO2, reactive N, and CH4 emissions, these processes will also likely alter the rate of GHG release and impact the rate of climate change [24]. Considering that dryland ecosystems are predicted to expand due to climate change and land-use shifts [25], characterization of soil microbial communities, or microbiota, responsible for biogeochemical fluxes from pristine arid soils is essential for understanding the community dynamics across organizational scales and its effects on global carbon fluxes.

Globally, dryland microbiomes are dominated by bacteria members of the phylum Actinomycetota (Actinobacteria), Chloroflexota (Chloroflexi), and the Pseudomonadota (Proteobacteria) [24]. Less is known about microbial groups that control the local flux of CH4, including CH4-oxidizing bacteria, anaerobic methanotrophic archaea, and methanogenic archaea [26]. Different microbial groups, including members of the genera Methylocapsa, Methylococcus, and the family Methylocystaceae have been identified as possible players in methane cycling in these environments [27]. A study assessing >3400 metagenomes to examine the global patterns of CH4 metabolism marker gene abundances in soil (a proxy for the distribution of CH4-metabolizing microorganisms), has revealed the existence of latitudinal trends in the global abundances of these microbes [28]. The variations in global abundances of CH4-metabolizing microorganisms have been primarily governed by vegetation cover [28], with no clear patterns in the structure and composition of methanotrophic communities [27].

This study investigated the role of soil microbiota in modulating CH4 fluxes for comprehending deserts as CH4 sinks. The Anza-Borrego Desert State Park (mentioned hereafter as “Anza-Borrego”) was selected as a model system for investigating the methanotrophic soil communities, including those inhabiting plant rhizosphere. The Anza-Borrego Desert ecosystem lies within the Colorado Desert of southern California, United States. Once a tropical forest, then a wetland and savanna, and finally one of the hottest deserts in the western United States, this area was assessed to determine the impact of microbiota from semiarid regions on the methane cycle. This study integrates in situ CH4 fluxes measurements, microbial metagenomics, and the metabolic potential of methanotrophic bacteria isolates, thus providing insights into how the soil microbiota, with and without vegetation, consumes CH4.

Materials and methods

Methane flux measurements

Methane flux measurements at the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park (33.305667, −116.254626; at 208 m over sea level; Supplementary Fig. S1A) were conducted using an ultra-portable greenhouse gas analyzer (UPGGA) LGR model 915–001 (ABB Inc., Quebec, Canada). The initial data, collected in 2016 and 2018 using a 3 L chamber, suggested a positive correlation between soil cover (plants) and methane consumption rates. We returned in March 2020 and 2023 to remeasure methane fluxes using a larger 12.87 L chamber, placed over either vegetated (with the endemic desert verbena Abronia villosa) or unvegetated patches (Supplementary Fig. S1B-C). Measurements taken every 1 s were collected during >15 min on six sites spaced >3 m apart. On each site, vegetated and unvegetated patches located <0.5 m from each other were measured (Supplementary Fig. S1D-E).

Soil samples for metagenomics

Two different sampling campaigns took place in 2016 and 2023. In February and May 2016, samples were collected from three depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm in both vegetated (e.g., brittlebush, desert willow) and unvegetated soil patches. Soil samples from 2016 were placed in sterile bags and kept at ambient temperature. Samples (25 g) for DNA and RNA extraction were collected into 50 ml tubes containing 25 ml of TE buffer with 10% phenol:ethanol (5:95 v/v) stop solution, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory for processing. Enrichment cultures and DNA extractions were started within 24 h of sample collection. Subsets of collected soil samples (25 g each) were incubated with 13CH4 added to 1% of headspace every second day for 7 days. The 13C-DNA fractions were collected as previously described [29] and submitted for sequencing. Significant cross-feeding was observed in the 13C-study experiments, and the data were excluded from analyses provided here; however, the resulting metagenomic sequences are available on the Joint Genome Institute (JGI)–Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) website (Supplementary Table S1). From 2016–2018 sequencing efforts, we described only metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) in this study. Additional soil samples for metagenomic studies were collected in Spring 2023. In situ methane flux measurements were obtained for each site. Six soil replicates equivalent to 1 ml volumes of soil enclosed in a 2 ml cryovial were collected at 10 cm of depth on five sites (vegetated or unvegetated, Supplementary Fig. S1F). Samples were preserved immediately in dry ice and subsequently stored at −80°C until processed for DNA extraction.

Enrichment studies, pure culture, and cultivation

Methanotrophic cultures were isolated from soil samples collected in Spring 2015, 2016, and 2018, using the previously described enrichment strategy [30]. All axenic cultures of methanotrophic bacteria were cultivated using P0% medium [31, 32] and maintained at 30°C at constant agitation at 200 rpm. Methylotrophic and non-methylotrophic satellite cultures from methanotrophic enrichments or consortia were achieved by serial plating on diluted minimal medium (0.3x Hypho) [33] supplemented with 0.1% methanol or P0% media supplemented with 0.1% (v/v) methanol (PM) and/or 5% Nutrient Broth (PNB, Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™).

DNA preparation, sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Microbiome DNA was extracted using two different methods. Samples from 2016 were extracted using a modified 25:24:1 phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol protocol [34]. Samples collected in 2023 were extracted using a protocol adapted from Povedano-Prieto et al. [35] and Zeugin and Hartley [36, 37] (Supplementary Material). Samples were sequenced using 2 × 250 chemistry on NovaSeq (Illumina). Metagenomic reads were processed in KBase [38] following their pipeline for processing metagenomic samples [39], using MetaSPAdes for assembly [40]. Assembled metagenomes were submitted to the Integrated Microbial Genomes & Microbiomes (IMG/M) system (Supplementary Table S1) and annotated with the IMG Pipeline (v.5.1.17 [41]).

Genomic DNA was extracted from the isolated bacteria and co-cultures utilizing the GeneJET (Thermo Scientific) or DNeasy (Qiagen) DNA purification kits, following the manufacturer’s protocols. The 2016 metagenome and isolate genome sequencing and assembling were executed by the JGI [41, 42]. All metagenomes and genomes from this study were uploaded and annotated through the IMG annotation pipelines (v.4.15.1, v.4.15.2, or v.4.16.1 [41]) following JGI protocols (Supplementary Tables S1-S2).

Taxonomic assignment of reads

Quality filtered pair end metagenomic reads were classified using Kaiju (v1.9.0 [43]) with NCBI BLAST nr + euk (10-Mar-2022) [44, 45] as a reference database, allowing mismatches (greedy mode) with 3 maximum mismatches, 65 of minimum Bitscore, and a maximum E-value of 0.01. Kaiju outputs were converted to summary tables agglomerated at the family taxonomic level using the Kaiju2table program (nested inside Kaiju). Individual metagenome tables were merged using R (v4.3.2).

Alpha and Beta diversity

The resulting merged count, metadata, and taxonomy tables from 2023 metagenomes were further processed using PhyloSeq [46]. The alpha diversity of taxonomically assigned metagenomic reads without any normalization was determined using Breakaway [47]. Count data was rarefied to the smallest read set (using “rarefy_even_depth”) and used to calculate various measures of alpha diversity (using “estimate_richness”) within PhyloSeq. Additionally, community similarity/dissimilarity metrics were calculated using a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity distance matrix with the rarefied datasets and plotted as an Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (using “ordinate” and “plot_ordination”) with PhyloSeq. Graphs were visualized using ggplot2 (v3.3.6 [48]), and all processing was done in R (v4.3.2).

Recovery and phylogeny of copper monooxygenases from desert metagenomes

Translated sequences assigned to KEGGs IDs K10946 (pmoC/amoC), K10944 (pmoA/amoA), K10945 (pmoB/amoB) encoding the three subunits for the two copper monooxygenases (CuMOs), particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoCAB), and ammonia monooxygenase (amoCAB), were retrieved from the Anza-Borrego 2023 metagenomes annotated in IMG/M. All sequences from publicly available prokaryote genomes on the IMG/M database (v2023–10) for these genes were also retrieved, excluding MAGs without detailed source information. Available MAGs for NC10 and endosymbionts were included in the analysis. A phylogenetic tree for each subunit was generated including both sets of genes (Anza-Borrego 2023 metagenomes and publicly available). All phylogenetic analyses of this study were performed by making an initial alignment using the multiple alignment program MAFFT (v7.511), choosing the E-INS-i method [20, 21]. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred with the MEGA X software (v10.2.6) using the maximum likelihood method. The model of each gene sequence set with the lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC) scores was calculated utilizing partial deletion with a site coverage cutoff of 95% and corresponded to GTR plus gamma distribution with invariant sites (GTR + G + I) [49–52]. A total of 500 bootstrap replications were computed for each phylogenetic tree of this study. The Newick output of the phylogeny was further processed in iTol [53] to color-code the position of each metagenome-retrieved sequence, distinguishing between vegetated or unvegetated origin. Additionally, three types of CuMOs (methane, ammonium, or alkane monooxygenases) were color-coded based on previous reports for the substrate each organism utilized with their corresponding CuMOs.

A maximum likelihood tree representing the phylogenetic relationship of the multiple particulate methane monooxygenase subunit C (pmoC) sequences of Methylocaldum was generated based on their amino acid sequences. The model with the lowest BIC scores for the translated pmoC gene set corresponded to LG with a discrete Gamma distribution with five rate categories [49–52]. This analysis involved 40 amino acid sequences. There was a total of 315 positions in the final dataset. A total of 500 bootstrap replications were computed. The genomic contexts were obtained from NCBI GenBank annotations and manually curated and re-annotated using the software Geneious Prime 2023. Exported gene cluster images were manually matched with the corresponding sequences on the PmoC phylogenetic tree.

Generation of metagenome-assembled genomes

For the 2016 metagenomes, MAGs were generated, quality assessed, and taxonomically assigned on IMG/M with MetaBAT (v0.32.5 [54]), CheckM (v1.0.11 [55]), and GTDB database release 86, GTDB-tk (v0.1.6 [39]), respectively. For the 2023 samples, MAGs were generated in KBase with MetaBAT2 (v1.7 [56]) with a minimum contig length set at 1500 bp. Bins were filtered by quality using CheckM (v1.0.18 [55]), and then taxonomically classified with the GTDB-Tk (v2.3.2 [39]) overwriting taxonomy and selecting the r214 GTDB version. A comparison based on the annotated predicted coding sequences for MAGs from 2016 and 2023 metagenomes was obtained in KBase using DRAM [57].

In silico reconstruction of Methylocaldum PmoC folds

Predicted 3D (tertiary) structures for Methylocaldum PmoC proteins were generated using ColabFold (v5.1.2 [58]), and its models from AlphaFold (v2.3.1 [59]). Structure predictions were evaluated based on similarity to the nearest relative with a characterized structure, a particulate MMO (pMMO) enzyme from Methylococcus capsulatus strain Bath determined using cryo-electron microscopy (PBD: 7S4J) [60]. Predicted structures were visualized with the software ChimeraX (v1.6.1 [61]), and distances between Methylocaldum PmoC predicted structures and M. capsulatus pMMO were determined using the ChimeraX command matchmaker.

In silico evaluation of the metabolic potential of Methylocaldum isolates and MAGs

An overall comparison of the metabolic potential for the isolate genomes was performed based on the percentage of genes assigned to each of the 24 COG categories from the IMG/MER annotations [42, 62]. A detailed cross-comparison between the genomes of the isolated strains was done following the established pangenome analysis [63] using the Anvi’o software (v7 [64]). Genome clustering was generated based on the presence/absence of predicted genes (utilizing their amino acid sequence) and grouping by similarity using the MCL algorithm (inflation of 8 [65] and a Minbit score of 0.8). The clusters were organized based on Euclidean distance and Ward linkage methods. The predicted genes were annotated with DIAMOND using the fast parameter against NCBI’s Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) database [66]. KEGG annotation was obtained for each gene call utilizing the KEGG KOfam database as previously described [67]. The Average Nucleotide Identity multiplied by the Aligned Coverage (ANI × AC) values, called full percent identity in the Anvi’o software, were computed with anvi-compute-genome-similarity utilizing PyANI [68] across the 10  Methylocaldum genomes. This parameter was chosen because it reflects the genomic relatedness among genomes better than ANI alone [69].

Results and discussion

Reverse chimney of arid soils unfolds: In situ methane consumption rates are accelerated by vegetation and linked to daylight intensity

Positive correlations between soil cover (vegetation) and methane consumption rates were observed in all field studies conducted in 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2023. The results discussed below are from 2020 and 2023, as they include the most comprehensive set of metadata, such as the type of vegetation—we collected gas fluxes only over A. villosa (desert verbena) and the sunlight phase during the measurements. CH4 fluxes of Anza-Borrego soil from vegetated sites were observed to vary during the day, reaching their consumption peak during the hours of most intense sunlight with up to 12.73 μmol m−2 h−1 at noon (Fig. 1A). The average CH4 consumption rate in vegetated sites between 10:00 a.m. (i.e., 3 h after sunrise) and 2:00 p.m. (9.07 μmol m−2 h−1+/− 2.2) was 2.4 times higher than the rates measured 3 h before sunset (3.78 μmol m−2 h−1+/− 0.81; Fig. 1B). In contrast, unvegetated sites from the immediate vicinity constantly consumed CH4 at a rate between 2.26 to 3.74 μmol m−2 h−1 +/− 0.46 (Fig. 1A). Moreover, the peak CH4 consumption rates in vegetated sites between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. were 3.17 times higher and significantly different than the average rates for unvegetated sites (P value <0.0001; Fig. 1B). This serendipitous observation suggests that Anza-Borrego soil CH4 consumption rates at vegetated sites are linked to sunlight intensity, while the consumption rates of unvegetated patches are constant during the day (Fig. 1A). Many terrestrial plants can accelerate methane transfer from soil to atmosphere, a phenomenon often described chimneys of methane (Fig. 1C) [70–73]. Our evidence suggests that arid plants can reverse the methane flow and accelerate atmospheric methane sink. Hence, arid plants and plant biomes will be referred to here as reverse chimneys (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The methane flux (consumption) comparing vegetated and unvegetated patches in the Anza Borrego Desert State Park. (A) the presence of vegetation and methanotrophs correlated positively with an increased consumption rate of methane. (B) Comparison of methane consumption between morning and afternoon. Significance with P value <0.0001 (****) and 0.0229 (*) obtained with unpaired parametric t-test. (C) Graphical summary of the chimney effect. The ribbons in (C) and (D) represent soil moisture (WATER) and organic content (ORG.MATTER). (D) Graphical summary of the proposed reverse chimney effect in arid ecosystems.

Reverse chimneys of arid soils empowered by vegetation rather than methanotrophic community structure

The taxonomic assignment of the Anza-Borrego metagenomic reads (microbiome) from 2023 to a (non-viral) family using Kaiju resulted in <45% of the total sequences being assigned, which is within the output range reported for this approach with similar sample types [43]. This assessment revealed that the most abundant members of these microbiomes were similarly distributed among both vegetated and unvegetated sites (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S2). The most abundant bacteria in these microbiomes belonged to the phyla Actinomycetota (12%–19%), Pseudomonadota (7%–12%), and Acidobacteriota (2%–3%); and to a lesser extent Chloroflexota (1.8%–2.5%), Planctomycetota (1.0%–1.2%), Bacilliota (0.5%–1.1%), Gemmatimonadota (0.8%–1.2%), Bacteroidota (0.5%–2.0%), and Nitrososphaerota (0.4–0.9%). The families Methylobacteriaceae (0.3%–2.4%) and Bradyrhizobiaceae (0.3%–0.5%) were the most abundant Pseudomonadota in these microbiomes (Fig. 2A). Reads assigned to known methanotroph families were found in all vegetated and unvegetated Anza-Borrego 2023 samples. Methylococcaceae had the highest relative abundance of all the methanotrophs detected (representing between 0.06% and 0.3% of all the taxonomically assigned reads), followed by Methylocystaceae (with 0.04%–0.06%), and Methylophilaceae (with 0.01–0.04%). Methylothermaceae and Methylacidiphilaceae were the less abundant ranging between 0.002% and 0.006% (Fig. 2B). Taxonomic assignation at genus level revealed Methylocaldum (Methylococcaceae) as the most abundant methanotroph in both vegetated and unvegetated samples, between 0.01–0.04% followed by Methylocystis (Methylocystaceae), Methylocapsa (Beijerinckiaceae) and Methylobacter (Methylococcaceae) with abundances of 0.03–0.09% (Fig. 2C). Reads assigned to methanotrophs were also found in Anza-Borrego 2016 metagenomes, with an average of 0.5% of relative abundance of Methylococcaceae, 0.3% Methylophilaceae, 0.09% of Methylocystaceae, 0.007% Methylothermaceae, and 0.003% Methylacidiphilaceae.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Relative abundance of reads taxonomically assigned groups at a family level. Only abundant families are listed on the legend (>0.5% of assigned reads). (B) Relative abundance of reads taxonomically assigned to methanotrophic groups at family level. (C) Relative abundance of reads taxonomically assigned to methanotrophic genera. (D) Alpha diversity of all normalized taxonomically assignable metagenomic reads of samples with and without vegetation. Non-significant differences were found for Shannon (paired t-test P value = 0.184) and Simpson (paired t-test P value = 0.2354) indexes. Normalized data was randomly rarefied to 1 721 047 reads. (E) Beta diversity was visualized through a NMDS plot of the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity distances between all the taxonomically assignable metagenomic reads.

Both normalized and non-normalized approaches, using the taxonomically assignable metagenomic reads, showed no significant differences between the alpha diversity among the Anza-Borrego samples with and without vegetation (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Fig. S2). This trend was also confirmed through pairwise comparison between vegetated and unvegetated when assessing the beta diversity using their normalized taxonomically assignable metagenomic read counts (Fig. 2E) [27].

The similarities between assigned microbial communities do not follow the initial assumption that vegetation, including plant litter and root exudates, serves as a source of organic matter for microbes and leads to distinctive shifts in soil microbial diversity [24]. Since this study investigated the rhizosphere of the seasonal vascular plant A. villosa (desert verbena), which has a lifespan of only 2 to 3 months between late autumn and early spring, and samples were collected during the first month of plant growth, it might not produce sufficient exudates to change its rhizosphere microbiota to detectable levels and only influence root epibionts. On the other hand, in nutrient-poor and arid environments, plants do not waste resources on supporting a broader microbiome community but rather tend to control nutrient exchange directly with microbes that colonize roots [74–76]. The results presented here agree with a previous study reporting no significant changes in the total abundance and richness of key marker genes for methanotrophic microbes when assessing different vegetation and climate types from 80 dryland ecosystems [27]. Based on the recovered soil microbiome structures from unvegetated and vegetated sites, we conclude that the observed enhancement of the methane flux is plant-driven and might be achieved in two ways: close colonization of plant roots by Methylocaldum spp. or enhanced activity of yet-to-be-discovered methanotrophic functions or organisms.

Numerous CuMOs are identified in the Anza-Borrego soil metagenomes

Considering the low representation of genomes for dryland soil methanotrophs in current databases and its consequent limitations for their identification in metagenomic datasets, the prevalence of methanotrophs in Anza-Borrego was further assessed using functional metabolic marker genes, such as those coding for the key enzymes for CH4 oxidation: methane monooxygenases (MMO). This enzyme has two types: a soluble MMO (sMMO) and pMMO. Only one sMMO sequence was recovered from all Anza-Borrego 2023 metagenomes. The search for pMMO using KEGG and TIGR databases additionally retrieved genes for other CuMOs, representing ammonia and alkane monooxygenases. The phylogenetic relationship of CuMOs retrieved in this functional screening was generated to distinguish which taxa had each of the three possible CuMOs. A total of 148 CuMOs A, 166 CuMOs B, and 146 CuMOs C gene sequences were recovered from the assembled Anza-Borrego 2023 metagenomes (Fig. 3). Thirty-seven and forty-three CuMO sequences associated with canonical methanotrophic taxa (putative methanotrophs) were recovered from vegetated and unvegetated sites, respectively, with the majority corresponding to pmoB subunits (25 in vegetated and 27 in unvegetated metagenomes). In addition, CuMOs from ammonia oxidizers were retrieved from both vegetated and unvegetated sites (97 and 116 genes, respectively), as well as CuMOs related to putative hydrocarbon (alkane) oxidizers (58 from vegetated sites and 66 from unvegetated). These results denote the extensive diversity of potential CH4 oxidizers in the Anza-Borrego soil microbiomes and suggest that the prevalence of all three types of CuMOs may be independent of the presence of vegetation (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Maximum likelihood trees representing the phylogenetic relationship between CuMOs across bacteria and archaea retrieved from the metagenomes and publicly available genomes. The functional richness of the different subunits from the Anza-Borrego metagenomes is represented by green (vegetated) and yellow (unvegetated) lines at the tips of their corresponding leaves. The outside color-coded ring guides the function of CuMOs, which was assigned based on the taxon at the corresponding leaf. The phylogenetic trees do not show the branch length to facilitate the visualization of clade topology.

MAGs and isolate genomes indicate methanotrophy potential in the Anza-Borrego soil microbiome beyond canonical species

The 2016 and 2023 Anza-Borrego soil metagenomes were used to generate 84 MAGs, of which 10 were high-quality and 53 medium-quality drafts [77] (Supplementary Fig. S3). Among them, eight MAGs had methane monooxygenase and methanol dehydrogenase genes. These included three Methylocaldum, two Methylobacter, one Methylococcaceae, and two that could only be assigned to the class Gammaproteobacteria, with their pmoB subunits having a 36% coverage with 74% identity to pmoB of Methylococcus and the other a 36% coverage with 75% identity to Methylocaldum pmoB (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of the metabolic potential of isolates and relevant MAGs obtained from Anza-Borrego (2016 and 2023). The analysis indicates the presence of key genes involved in relevant pathways for this study.

Also, other 12 MAGs had at least one of the three CuMO subunit genes (Fig.4): 10 Nitrososphaeraceae (ammonia-oxidizing), (Fig. 4), one Acidimicrobiia, and one Pedosphaerales (Supplementary Fig. S3) with CuMO subunits with high identity to recovered pmoA sequences from Anza-Borrego that formed part of the putative alkane-oxidizer clade and Methylocaldum stand-alone pmoC Types 4 and 5, respectively.

Five pure cultures of methanotrophic bacteria were obtained from the Anza-Borrego cultivation efforts (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table S1). Among these isolates, four corresponded to Methylocaldum (strains 0917, S3V3, YM2, and RMAD-M, all with a genome size of 5.2 to 5.4 Mbp), and one corresponded to Methylosinus sp. Sav-2 (4.7 Mbp). All isolated Methylocaldum grew only when supplemented with methane between 0.04% to 20% (for enrichments and routinary culture, respectively) and did not grow when supplemented with methanol or organic acids as carbon sources. The growth of Methylosinus sp. Sav-2 can be supported by methane and methanol. Ten isolates corresponded to non-methanotrophic bacteria, including Bradyrhizobium (strains W, R2.2-H, BM-T, Y-H1, all with a genome size of 8.0 Mb), Neorhizobium sp. R1-B (5.5 Mb) and S3V5DH (5.8 Mb), Caulobacter sp. H1 (3.7 Mb) and the methylotroph Methylobacterium sp. R2–1 (5.8 Mb). The growth of methylotrophic cultures can be supported by methanol and organic acids (pyruvate, succinate).

All expected metabolic functions in Methylocaldum MAGs were reproduced in at least one of the genomes of isolated strains obtained in this study (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. S3). Therefore, since the genus Methylocaldum (from the family Methylococcaceae) was the most dominant methanotrophic bacterial group detected in the Anza-Borrego metagenomes (Fig. 2C), further analysis focused on the metabolic potential of the Methylocaldum isolates. A genomic comparison between the Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum and the 10 Methylocaldum genomes (Supplementary Table S3, Supplementary Fig. S4) that were publicly available at the time of the analysis was performed to assess the distinguishing metabolic features of the dryland isolates. For example, all the Methylocaldum genomes had the metabolic potential for nitrogen fixation, and both the large (K01601) and small (K01602) subunit of a Type-IA/B ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. S5). The Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum isolates presented more lanthanide-dependent xoxF3-type methanol dehydrogenase paralogs compared to the genomes of isolates from other environments following previous xoxF assignations [78–80] (Supplementary Fig. S6). Further details on key features of the Anza-Borrego genomes, as unveiled by assessing the distribution of the 8668 groups of orthologous genes comprising the Methylocaldum pangenome, are described below (and in Supplementary Tables S4 and S5).

Methylocaldum has four pmoC paralogs in addition to the canonical gene involved in methane oxidation

The Methylocaldum pangenome revealed the presence of several paralogs among the 39 pmoC retrieved (K10946), of which only nine formed parts of the canonical pMMO gene cluster (Fig. 5). The remaining stand-alone pmoC paralogs (that included neither pmoA nor pmoB) could be grouped into four distinctive gene contexts that were conserved even among representatives isolated from different continents (Fig. 5A and Supplementary Fig. S4). These stand-alone pmoC genes clades were named “Type 2 to 5” considering their conserved genomic context and phylogenetic placement to the canonical “Type 1” pMMO gene cluster (Fig. 5B and Supplementary Material). The immediate vicinity of the conserved genomic context of Type 2 Methylocaldum pmoC had genes involved with nucleoside modification or the biosynthesis of GMP and the generation of radical species by reductive cleavage of S-adenosylmethionine. The genes located near Type 3 pmoCs encode the degradation of polyhydroxybutyrate, an energy and carbon storage polymer [81], and the Na-translocating NADH-quinone reductase respiratory complex operon [82]. All Type 4 pmoC are located between two genes, one of which has a fumarate/nitrate reduction transcriptional regulator domain, and both contain helix-turn-helix domains. Thus, these genes likely have a role in either transcriptional regulation or DNA-binding processes [83], that in Escherichia coli have been linked to an oxygen-responsive transcriptional regulation to switch from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism [84]. The Type 5 pmoC clusters the rsbU gene, which has been shown to contribute to general stress sensing and response, as well as oxygen starvation [85, 86], and a putative nucleoside deaminase, followed by the GCN5-Related (GNAT-family) N-Acetyltransferases, are known to contribute to a broad spectrum of cellular metabolic and regulatory functions [87].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Maximum likelihood tree representing the phylogenetic relationship of Methylocaldum particulate methane monooxygenase, based on the amino acid sequences of the pmoC gene. Next to each branch, the projection has a color-coded representation of the predicted functions for the genes in the vicinity of each pmoC. Next to each clade, brackets indicate with a number the type of pmoC corresponding to each clade. Type 1 PmoC is part of the canonical pMMO, whereas Types 2 to 5 correspond to the different stand-alone PmoC. Predicted AlphaFold models were based on the prediction obtained from the CryoEM structure of Methylococcus capsulatus (bath) pMMO in a native lipid nanodisc at 2.16 Angstrom resolution (ID 7S4J). Predicted structures are color-coded according to the confidence percentage in the model accuracy. (B) Gene function prediction for genes in the vicinity of each of the five types of pmoC from Methylocaldum strains. The canonical pmoC from 0917 was recovered from a metatranscriptome.

To further investigate the stand-alone pmoC function, the in-silico simulations of the predicted tertiary structure of Methylocaldum PmoC types were carried out. The analyses showed a differential tertiary structure for all stand-alone PmoC, whereas still preserving their transmembrane domains (Supplementary Fig. S7 and Supplementary videos). Additionally, the search for the presence of the key amino acid residues forming the Cu D binding site, which recent structural studies had indicated as the methane oxidation catalytic center in PmoC [88] was conserved across all Methylocaldum PmoC types (Supplementary Fig. S8). Types 2 and 3 PmoCs differ from Type 1 only slightly in structure, suggesting that these stand-alone PmoC likely perform similar membrane anchoring and/or metabolite binding functions. Individual differences in residues compared to Type 1 might reflect lessened evolutionary pressure for folding outside of catalytic regions when the structure is not restricted by a multi-protein complex. Type 4 differs in the structure of the N-terminal signal peptide, suggesting that these proteins differ in their subcellular localization compared to the other PmoC types. Type 5 PmoC contains an ~40 residue region that extends the largest cytoplasmic domain. This additional catalytic region might reflect additional substrate specificities, substrate preferences, or new binding sites. Additional experimental work will be needed to confirm functional differences between these pmoC types.

Overall, the functional diversity of the genes in the immediate vicinity and the same orientation as the stand-alone pmoC, added to their differential tertiary structure, suggests that in Methylocaldum these paralogs are likely involved in other functions not related to CH4-oxidation (Fig. 5B and Supplementary Material).

TRAP transporter system

A tripartite ATP-independent Periplasmic (TRAP)-type periplasmic transport system [89] was found exclusively in the Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum isolates and not in other Methylocaldum isolates (Fig. 4). TRAP transporters are one of the three known solute binding-protein-dependent systems which are characterized by their high-affinity for the uptake of substrates (the other two are the well-studied ATP-binding cassette and the more recently studied tripartite tricarboxylate transporters [90]). TRAP transporters do not require ATP hydrolysis and instead use transmembrane electrochemical gradients (usually sodium or other cations) to transport various molecules, including C4-dicarboxylates, sulfonate, and carboxyl-containing substrates [90, 91].

The putative TRAP-type transport system in the Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum isolates was found to be encoded by three genes—a TRAP transporter component, a periplasmic component, and the fused version of the large and small permease component. The putative TRAP-type gene cluster in the Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum isolates resembles an evolved variant of the TRAP transporters from Treponema pallidum [90, 92], which has been predicted to transport hydrophobic nutrients through the periplasm [93–95]. The involvement of this system in transporting substrates in response to reduced water availability has been suggested in a metaproteomic study reporting that the TRAP-type protein abundances produced by populations of Pseudomonadota (from the genus Acidithrix, Aureimonas, Niastella, and Pedobacter) and Actinomycetota (from the genus Jiangella) were higher in soils subjected to a regulated irrigation-deficit [96]. Considering that the methanotrophic bacteria have very limited ability to utilize extracellular organic carbon, the role of the TRAP transport mechanisms in Methylocaldum deserves a thorough investigation.

Interaction among methanotrophic microbiome members

Methylocaldum strains were co-isolated with Bradyrhizobium, and the challenges for their separation suggested some level of dependency for the methanotrophs. A genomic comparison revealed that Methylocaldum possesses only the genes necessary for salvaging cobalamin (vitamin B12). In contrast, Bradyrhizobium has all the necessary genes for the de novo synthesis of the essential cofactor (Fig. 6). Methylocaldum has two methionine synthesis pathways, dependent and independent of vitamin B12. However, considering that the association with Bradyrhizobium is advantageous for Methylocaldum growth (data not shown), we speculated that the B12 exchange supports the symbiotic interactions between the species. It has been previously demonstrated that rhizobia can stimulate the growth of methanotrophs via excreted cobalamin [97]. Our finding provides genetic evidence for such dependencies. It should be mentioned that the B12 exchange is perhaps the most common interaction between microbes in complex soil or aquatic communities. Several carbon and nitrogen catabolism pathways can also rely on cobalamin [98], and metagenomic studies indicate that only <10% of soil prokaryotes encode the genetic potential for de novo synthesis [99].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Genomic potential for cobalamin (vitamin B12) de novo synthesis and salvaging by Anza-Borrego isolates of Bradyrhizobium and Methylocaldum, respectively. The required genes for de novo cobalamin synthesis are present in the Bradyrhizobium genome. The absence of the initial required genes for de novo synthesis and the presence of two paralogs of the cobalamin outer membrane cobalamin receptor and transporter gene, btuB, indicates that Methylocaldum relies on a salvaging pathway of cobalamin.

Both rhizobia and methanotrophs have been shown as key microbial partners for N2 fixation in non-leguminous plants [100]. Even though expected for Bradyrhizobium, additionally, all Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum strains have the genetic potential for dinitrogen (N2) fixation, including nifH (K02588) and nifK (K02591), in addition to nifB (K02585), nifD (K02586), nifQ (K15790), nifU (K04488), and nifZ (K02597) (Supplementary Fig. S9). Therefore, Methylocaldum has the enzymatic inventory to fix nitrogen, providing an advantage for both bacteria and its host plant in the low-nutrient desert environment.

Searches for metabolisms favoring the interaction of the Methylocaldum-Bradyrhizobium consortia with plants pointed to the different pathways for tryptophan synthesis and its subsequent metabolization to indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production as relevant. Methylocaldum and Bradyrhizobium both have the necessary genomic potential for tryptophan synthesis (Fig. 7). IAA is an important auxin in plants, which acts as a phytohormone regulating plant growth and also mediates bacterial physiology [101]. Methylocaldum and Bradyrhizobium have the complete gene set necessary for IAA production via tryptamine and indole-3-acetaldehyde. Moreover, Bradyrhizobium can also potentially produce IAA via indole-3-acetamide, whereas Methylocaldum could also produce it via indole pyruvate (Fig. 7B). Production of IAA had been found in a majority of plant-interacting bacteria and had been shown to confer benefits to the host plant, and also an advantage under environmental stress for bacteria [101].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Genomic potential for tryptophan and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) synthesis in Anza-Borrego isolates of Bradyrhizobium and Methylocaldum. (A) Comparison of metabolic potential for the synthesis of IAA by Anza-Borrego isolates. (B) The major difference in their tryptophan synthesis pathway relies on the gene encoding the initial step enzymes; Bradyrhizobium has the fused version of the anthranilate synthase TrpEG, and Methylocaldum has its two components separately.

Conclusions

This study was inspired by a high methane sink observed in arid ecosystems via in situ measurements almost three decades ago [19] and a more recent remote-sensor-based demonstration of arid ecosystems as “black holes” of methane, i.e., environments with methane levels significantly below the average [102]. Here, we aimed to better understand the underlying biological means of arid methane sinks. We investigated methane cycling in the Anza-Borrego State Park, starting with enrichments in 2016, followed by additional sampling sets in 2018, 2020, and 2023. Each time, we isolated microbes from vegetated sites, which inspired a deeper investigation of methanotrophic biome structure via metagenomic studies and in situ methane flux measurements. Integrated, the data highlights the importance of interaction among arid biomes, especially soil microbes and arid vegetation, for atmospheric methane consumption. Plant-supported methane flux shows daily dynamics, suggesting yet-to-be-determined links with the plant’s photosynthetic activity. This observation became the foundation for the reverse chimney hypothesis proposed here (Fig. 1D), which could partially explain why deserts constitute natural CH4 sinks. This hypothesis was coined as the opposite of the chimney effect [70–73], in which plants transport CH4 from the anoxic soil layers from their roots through their vascular system to their leaves and release it into the atmosphere (Fig. 1C). The reverse chimney hypothesis proposes that in dryland ecosystems (i.e., low organic matter and limited water availability) plants transport CH4 and oxygen from the atmosphere through their vascular system down to the soil, where it is consumed and converted by methanotrophic microbiota (Fig. 1D). It is tempting to speculate that plants accelerate desert methane sinks by providing unique ecosystem support for methanotrophic microbes. Research on how plants contribute to the modulation of CH4 fluxes has only recently started to be explored. The results presented here encourage future studies aimed at understanding how the CH4 concentration, macronutrients (i.e., N, S, or P), and moisture levels of the soil determine whether a system functions as a sink or source of CH4. The plant-promoting properties of the desert Methylocaldum species will be described in a separate study.

The Methylocaldum clade is the most prominent methanotroph in the studied ecosystem, and is the most likely contributes to the observed atmospheric methane consumption. Up to date, none of the Methylocaldum spp. were reported as high-affinity methane oxidizers [103, 104]. Thus, their role in the soil methane cycling needs to be re-evaluated. Genomic analysis of Methylocaldum isolates provides insights into the unique metabolic features of the dominant methanotroph in Anza-Borrego soil, contributing to the understanding of microbial adaptation in arid environments. These adaptations include the presence of multiple stand-alone pmoC paralogs in Methylocaldum, which may have functions beyond methane oxidation or contribute to high-affinity methane oxidation. The TRAP found in Anza-Borrego Methylocaldum isolates might play an important role in supporting substrate transport under reduced water availability.

Genomic evidence suggests that Methylocaldum may rely on a symbiotic relationship with Bradyrhizobium for cobalamin (vitamin B12) due to its lack of de novo synthesis genes. Additionally, both Methylocaldum and Bradyrhizobium possess the necessary genes for tryptophan synthesis and IAA production, indicating a potential interaction that benefits plant growth and bacterial adaptation in arid environments. Establishing beneficial rhizosphere microbiomes in drylands could enhance soil stability by producing an extracellular matrix [105], promoting vascular plant growth, or generating a positive feedback loop that supports the proposed reverse chimney effect.

These findings are the starting point for further research on how CH4 concentrations, macronutrients, and soil moisture levels influence the role of plant-microbiome biomes in modulating CH4 fluxes at different scales across seasons in arid ecosystems. Further research is needed to explore the impact of different vegetation types, environmental conditions, and soil microbiomes on terrestrial CH4 fluxes.

Supplementary Material

PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_1_wraf026
Download video file (17.4MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_2_wraf026
Download video file (17.6MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_3_wraf026
Download video file (22.9MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_4_wraf026
Download video file (32.9MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_5_wraf026
Download video file (18.1MB, mp4)
Supplementary_Material_Revision_ISMEJ-D-24-01549R2_(1)_wraf026

Acknowledgements

We thank Jade Wade, Jackie Avalos, and Richard Hamilton for supporting field trips, enrichment, and metagenomic studies performed in 2018 and 2020. We thank Donatella Zona for sharing her team equipment and expertise in in situ methane flux measurements. We also thank Sheila Podell and Eric Allen for their advice in bioinformatic analysis. Thanks to California State Parks- Colorado Desert District for providing field studies permits and enabling access to the Anza Borrego Park. We thank the JGI- DOE team for their support and genomic sequencing efforts under the (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI), award 10.46936/10.25585/60001056. This work was supported by SDSU start-up funds to Dr. Kalyuzhnaya, 2023 SDSU-CORE Fellowship to N. Delherbe, and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) contract DE-SC0024289 for Reaching a New Energy Sciences Workforce (BER-RENEW). We also thank Grant PID2021-127623OB-I00 funded by MCIN 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe” for supporting Dr. Manzanera internship at SDSU.

Contributor Information

Nathalie A Delherbe, Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92129, United States.

Oscar Gomez, Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92129, United States.

Alvaro M Plominsky, Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.

Aaron Oliver, Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.

Maximino Manzanera, Institute for Water Research and Department of Microbiology, University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain.

Marina G Kalyuzhnaya, Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92129, United States.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) BER-RENEW initiative contract DE-SC0024289.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the JGI-IMG/MER repository, https://img.jgi.doe.gov/mer/.

References

  • 1. Dean  JF, Middelburg  JJ, Röckmann  T  et al.  Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Rev Geophys  2018;56:207–50. 10.1002/2017RG000559 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Katzenstein  AS, Doezema  LA, Simpson  IJ  et al.  Extensive regional atmospheric hydrocarbon pollution in the southwestern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci  2003;100:11975–9. 10.1073/pnas.1635258100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Pachauri  RK, Allen  MR, Barros  VR  et al.  Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2014, pp. 151. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Reay  DS, Smith  P, Christensen  TR  et al.  Methane and global environmental change. Annu Rev Environ Resour  2018;43:165–92. 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030154 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Myhre  G, Shindell  D, Bréon  F-M  et al.  Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • 6. Bridgham  SD, Cadillo-Quiroz  H, Keller  JK  et al.  Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob Chang Biol  2013;19:1325–46. 10.1111/gcb.12131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ciais  P, Sabine  C, Bala  G  et al.  Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2013:465–570. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kirschke  S, Bousquet  P, Ciais  P  et al.  Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci  2013;6:813–23. 10.1038/ngeo1955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. IPCC . Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2014, 151. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Duren  RM, Thorpe  AK, Foster  KT  et al.  California’s methane super-emitters. Nature  2019;575:180–4. 10.1038/s41586-019-1720-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Beck  V, Chen  H, Gerbig  C  et al.  Methane airborne measurements and comparison to global models during BARCA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres  2012;117:D15310. 10.1029/2011JD017345 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bousquet  P, Ringeval  B, Pison  I  et al.  Source attribution of the changes in atmospheric methane for 2006–2008. Atmos Chem Phys  2011;11:3689–700. 10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Curry  CL. Modeling the soil consumption of atmospheric methane at the global scale. Glob Biogeochem Cycles  2007;21:10.1029/2006GB002818. 10.1029/2006GB002818 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ito  A, Penner  JE. Global estimates of biomass burning emissions based on satellite imagery for the year 2000. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres  2004;109:10.1029/2003JD004423. 10.1029/2003JD004423 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Spahni  R, Wania  R, Neef  L  et al.  Constraining global methane emissions and uptake by ecosystems. Biogeosciences  2011;8:1643–65. 10.5194/bg-8-1643-2011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Aronson  EL, Helliker  BR. Methane flux in non-wetland soils in response to nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis. Ecology  2010;91:3242–51. 10.1890/09-2185.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ni  X, Groffman  PM. Declines in methane uptake in forest soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci  2018;115:8587–90. 10.1073/pnas.1807377115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schaefer  H, Fletcher  SEM, Veidt  C  et al.  A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4. Science  2016;352:80–4. 10.1126/science.aad2705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Striegl  RG, McConnaughey  TA, Thorstenson  DC  et al.  Consumption of atmospheric methane by desert soils. Nature  1992;357:145–7. 10.1038/357145a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Henckel  T, Jäckel  U, Schnell  S  et al.  Molecular analyses of novel methanotrophic communities in forest soil that oxidize atmospheric methane. Appl Environ Microbiol  2000;66:1801–8. 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1801-1808.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Le Mer  J, Roger  P. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol  2001;37:25–50. 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01067-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Middleton  N, Thomas  D. World Atlas of Desertification, Ed. 2 edn. United Kingdom, London: Arnold, Hodder Headline, PLC, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Safriel  U, Adeel  Z, Niemeijer  D  et al.  Dryland systems. In: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends.: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2005: 623–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Coleine  C, Delgado-Baquerizo  M, DiRuggiero  J  et al.  Dryland microbiomes reveal community adaptations to desertification and climate change. The ISME Journal  2024;18:wrae056. 10.1093/ismejo/wrae056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Burrell  A, Evans  J, De Kauwe  M. Anthropogenic climate change has driven over 5 million km2 of drylands towards desertification. Nat Commun  2020;11:3853–11. 10.1038/s41467-020-17710-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Guerrero-Cruz  S, Vaksmaa  A, Horn  MA  et al.  Methanotrophs: discoveries, environmental relevance, and a perspective on current and future applications. Front Microbiol  2021;12:678057. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.678057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lafuente  A, Bowker  MA, Delgado-Baquerizo  M  et al.  Global drivers of methane oxidation and denitrifying gene distribution in drylands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr  2019;28:1230–43. 10.1111/geb.12928 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ou  Y, Ren  Z, Chen  X  et al.  Global atlas of methane metabolism marker genes in soil. Environ Sci Technol  2024;58:9261–71. 10.1021/acs.est.4c02827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kalyuzhnaya  MG, Lapidus  A, Ivanova  N  et al.  High-resolution metagenomics targets specific functional types in complex microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol  2008;26:1029–34. 10.1038/nbt.1488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kalyuzhnaya  MG. Methane biocatalysis: Selecting the right microbe. In: Eckert CA, Trinh CT (eds.), Biotechnology for Biofuel Production and Optimization. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier B.V., 353–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Collins  DA, Kalyuzhnaya  MG. Navigating methane metabolism: enzymes, compartments, and networks. Methods Enzymol  2018;613:349–83. 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Narváez-Reinaldo  J, Barba  I, González-López  J  et al.  Rapid method for isolation of desiccation-tolerant strains and xeroprotectants. Appl Environ Microbiol  2010;76:5254–62. 10.1128/AEM.00855-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Harder  W, Attwood  MM, Quayle  J. Methanol assimilation by Hyphomicrobium sp. Microbiology  1973;78:155–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kalyuzhnaya  MG, Beck  DA, Chistoserdova  L. Functional metagenomics of methylotrophs. Methods Enzymol  2011;495:81–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Povedano-Priego  C, Jroundi  F, Lopez-Fernandez  M  et al.  Deciphering indigenous bacteria in compacted bentonite through a novel and efficient DNA extraction method: insights into biogeochemical processes within the deep geological disposal of nuclear waste concept. J Hazard Mater  2021;408:124600. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zeugin  JA, Hartley  JL. Ethanol precipitation of DNA. Focus  1985;7:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Naviaux  RK, Good  B, McPherson  JD  et al.  Sand DNA—a genetic library of life at the water’s edge. Mar Ecol Prog Ser  2005;301:9–22. 10.3354/meps301009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Arkin  AP, Cottingham  RW, Henry  CS  et al.  Kbase: the United States Department of Energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol  2018;36:566–9. 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chivian  D, Jungbluth  SP, Dehal  PS  et al.  Metagenome-assembled genome extraction and analysis from microbiomes using Kbase. Nat Protoc  2023;18:208–38. 10.1038/s41596-022-00747-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nurk  S, Meleshko  D, Korobeynikov  A  et al.  MetaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res  2017;27:824–34. 10.1101/gr.213959.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Huntemann  M, Ivanova  NN, Mavromatis  K  et al.  The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI microbial genome annotation pipeline (MGAP v. 4). Stand Genomic Sci  2015;10:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Chen  IMA, Chu  K, Palaniappan  K  et al.  The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.6.0: new tools and advanced capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res  2021;49:D751–63. 10.1093/nar/gkaa939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Menzel  P, Ng  KL, Krogh  A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with kaiju. Nat Commun  2016;7:1–9. 10.1038/ncomms11257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Sayers  EW, Bolton  EE, Brister  JR  et al.  Database resources of the National Center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res  2022;50:D20–6. 10.1093/nar/gkab1112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wheeler  DL, Barrett  T, Benson  DA  et al.  Database resources of the National Center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res  2007;36:D13–21. 10.1093/nar/gkm1000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. McMurdie  PJ, Holmes  S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One  2013;8:e61217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Willis  A, Bunge  J. Estimating diversity via frequency ratios. Biometrics  2015;71:1042–9. 10.1111/biom.12332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Wilkinson  L. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis by Wickham, H. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kumar  S, Stecher  G, Li  M  et al.  Mega x: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol  2018;35:1547–9. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Le  SQ, Gascuel  O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol  2008;25:1307–20. 10.1093/molbev/msn067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Nei  M, Kumar  S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. USA: Oxford University Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Stecher  G, Tamura  K, Kumar  S. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (mega) for macos. Mol Biol Evol  2020;37:1237–9. 10.1093/molbev/msz312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Letunic  I, Bork  P. Interactive tree of life (iTol) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res  2021;49:W293–6. 10.1093/nar/gkab301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kang  DD, Froula  J, Egan  R  et al.  MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ  2015;3:e1165. 10.7717/peerj.1165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Parks  DH, Imelfort  M, Skennerton  CT  et al.  CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res  2015;25:1043–55. 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kang  DD, Li  F, Kirton  E  et al.  MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ.  2019;7:e7359. 10.7717/peerj.7359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Shaffer  M, Borton  MA, Bolduc  B  et al.  Kb_DRAM: annotation and metabolic profiling of genomes with DRAM in KBase. Bioinformatics  2023;39:btad110. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Mirdita  M, Schütze  K, Moriwaki  Y  et al.  ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods  2022;19:679–82. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Jumper  J, Evans  R, Pritzel  A  et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature  2021;596:583–9. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Koo  CW, Tucci  FJ, He  Y  et al.  Recovery of particulate methane monooxygenase structure and activity in a lipid bilayer. Science  2022;375:1287–91. 10.1126/science.abm3282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Meng  EC, Goddard  TD, Pettersen  EF  et al.  UCSF ChimeraX: tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci  2023;32:e4792. 10.1002/pro.4792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Mukherjee  S, Stamatis  D, Bertsch  J  et al.  Genomes OnLine database (GOLD) v.8: overview and updates. Nucleic Acids Res  2021;49:D723–33. 10.1093/nar/gkaa983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Delmont  TO, Eren  AM. Linking pangenomes and metagenomes: the Prochlorococcus metapangenome. PeerJ.  2018;6:e4320. 10.7717/peerj.4320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Eren  AM, Esen  ÖC, Quince  C  et al.  Anvi'o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for 'omics data. PeerJ  2015;3:e1319. 10.7717/peerj.1319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. van Dongen  S, Abreu-Goodger  C. Using MCL to extract clusters from networks. Methods Mol Biol  2012;804:281–95. 10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Buchfink  B, Xie  C, Huson  DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using Diamond. Nat Methods  2015;12:59–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Aramaki  T, Blanc-Mathieu  R, Endo  H  et al.  KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile hmm and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics  2020;36:2251–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Pritchard  L, Glover  RH, Humphris  S  et al.  Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods  2016;8:12–24. 10.1039/C5AY02550H [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Varghese  NJ, Mukherjee  S, Ivanova  N  et al.  Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res  2015;43:6761–71. 10.1093/nar/gkv657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Bhullar  GS, Edwards  PJ, Olde  VH. Variation in the plant-mediated methane transport and its importance for methane emission from intact wetland peat mesocosms. J Plant Ecol  2013;6:298–304. 10.1093/jpe/rts045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Bringel  F, Couée  I. Pivotal roles of phyllosphere microorganisms at the interface between plant functioning and atmospheric trace gas dynamics. Front Microbiol  2015;6:486. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Joabsson  A, Christensen  TR, Wallén  B. Vascular plant controls on methane emissions from northern peatforming wetlands. Trends Ecol Evol  1999;14:385–8. 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01649-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zhang  Y, Cui  M, Duan  J  et al.  Abundance, rather than composition, of methane-cycling microbes mainly affects methane emissions from different vegetation soils in the Zoige alpine wetland. MicrobiologyOpen  2019;8:e00699. 10.1002/mbo3.699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Khan  N, Humm  EA, Jayakarunakaran  A  et al.  Reviewing and renewing the use of beneficial root and soil bacteria for plant growth and sustainability in nutrient-poor, arid soils. Front Plant Sci  2023;14:1147535. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1147535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Ma  W, Tang  S, Dengzeng  Z  et al.  Root exudates contribute to belowground ecosystem hotspots: a review. Front Microbiol  13:937940. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.937940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Vidal  C, González  F, Santander  C  et al.  Management of rhizosphere microbiota and plant production under drought stress: a comprehensive review. Plan Theory  2022;11:2437. 10.3390/plants11182437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Bowers  RM, Kyrpides  NC, Stepanauskas  R  et al.  Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol  2017;35:725–31. 10.1038/nbt.3893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Chistoserdova  L, Lidstrom  ME. Molecular and mutational analysis of a DNA region separating two methylotrophy gene clusters in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. Microbiology  1997;143:1729–36. 10.1099/00221287-143-5-1729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Huang  J, Yu  Z, Chistoserdova  L. Lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenases of xoxF4 and xoxF5 clades are differentially distributed among methylotrophic bacteria and they reveal different biochemical properties. Front Microbiol  2018;9:1366. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Keltjens  JT, Pol  A, Reimann  J  et al.  PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenases: rare-earth elements make a difference. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol  2014;98:6163–83. 10.1007/s00253-014-5766-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Roohi, Zaheer  MR, Kuddus  M. PHB (poly-β-hydroxybutyrate) and its enzymatic degradation. Polym Adv Technol  2018;29:30–40. 10.1002/pat.4126 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Dibrov  P, Dibrov  E, Pierce  GN. Na+−nqr (na+−translocating NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase) as a novel target for antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev  2017;41:653–71. 10.1093/femsre/fux032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Aravind  L, Anantharaman  V, Balaji  S  et al.  The many faces of the helix-turn-helix domain: transcription regulation and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Rev  2005;29:231–62. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Unden  G, Schirawski  J. The oxygen-responsive transcriptional regulator FNR of Escherichia coli: the search for signals and reactions. Mol Microbiol  1997;25:205–10. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4731841.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Delumeau  O, Dutta  S, Brigulla  M  et al.  Functional and structural characterization of RsbU, a stress signaling protein phosphatase 2c. J Biol Chem  2004;279:40927–37. 10.1074/jbc.M405464200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Makino  M, Kondo  S, Kaneko  T  et al.  Expression, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the PAS domain of Rsbp, a stress-response phosphatase from Bacillus subtilis. Acta Crystallogr Sect F: Struct Biol Cryst Commun  2009;65:559–61. 10.1107/S1744309109014158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Favrot  L, Blanchard  JS, Vergnolle  O. Bacterial gcn5-related n-acetyltransferases: from resistance to regulation. Biochemistry  2016;55:989–1002. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Tucci  FJ, Jodts  RJ, Hoffman  BM  et al.  Product analogue binding identifies the copper active site of particulate methane monooxygenase. Nature. Catalysis  2023;6:1194–204. 10.1038/s41929-023-01051-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Kelly  DJ, Thomas  GH. The tripartite ATP-independent periplasmic (TRAP) transporters of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev  2001;25:405–24. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00584.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Rosa  LT, Bianconi  ME, Thomas  GH  et al.  Tripartite ATP-independent periplasmic (TRAP) transporters and tripartite tricarboxylate transporters (TTT): from uptake to pathogenicity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol  2018;8:33. 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Davies  JS, Currie  MJ, Wright  JD  et al.  Selective nutrient transport in bacteria: multicomponent transporter systems reign supreme. Front Mol Biosci  2021;8:699222. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.699222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Radolf  JD, Deka  RK, Anand  A  et al.  Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete: making a living as a stealth pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol  2016;14:744–59. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Brautigam  CA, Deka  RK, Schuck  P  et al.  Structural and thermodynamic characterization of the interaction between two periplasmic Treponema pallidum lipoproteins that are components of a TPR-protein-associated trap transporter (TPAT). J Mol Biol  2012;420:70–86. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Deka  RK, Brautigam  CA, Goldberg  M  et al.  Structural, bioinformatic, and in vivo analyses of two Treponema pallidum lipoproteins reveal a unique TRAP transporter. J Mol Biol  2012;416:678–96. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Hawley  KL, Montezuma-Rusca  JM, Delgado  KN  et al.  Structural modeling of the Treponema pallidum outer membrane protein repertoire: a road map for deconvolution of syphilis pathogenesis and development of a syphilis vaccine. J Bacteriol  2021;203:e00082–21. 10.1128/JB.00082-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Starke  R, Bastida  F, Abadía  J  et al.  Ecological and functional adaptations to water management in a semiarid agroecosystem: a soil metaproteomics approach. Sci Rep  2017;7:10221. 10.1038/s41598-017-09973-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Iguchi  H, Yurimoto  H, Sakai  Y. Stimulation of methanotrophic growth in cocultures by cobalamin excreted by rhizobia. Appl Environ Microbiol  2011;77:8509–15. 10.1128/AEM.05834-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Shelton  AN, Seth  EC, Mok  KC  et al.  Uneven distribution of cobamide biosynthesis and dependence in bacteria predicted by comparative genomics. The ISME journal  2019;13:789–804. 10.1038/s41396-018-0304-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Lu  X, Heal  KR, Ingalls  AE  et al.  Metagenomic and chemical characterization of soil cobalamin production. The ISME journal  2020;14:53–66. 10.1038/s41396-019-0502-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Yoneyama  T, Terakado-Tonooka  J, Bao  Z  et al.  Molecular analyses of the distribution and function of diazotrophic rhizobia and methanotrophs in the tissues and rhizosphere of non-leguminous plants. Plan Theory  2019;8:408. 10.3390/plants8100408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Duca  DR, Glick  BR. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis and its regulation in plant-associated bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol  2020;104:8607–19. 10.1007/s00253-020-10869-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Song  H, Peng  C, Zhu  Q  et al.  Quantification and uncertainty of global upland soil methane sinks: processes, controls, model limitations, and improvements. Earth Sci Rev  2024;252:104758. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104758 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Bodrossy  L, Holmes  EM, Holmes  AJ  et al.  Analysis of 16s rRNA and methane monooxygenase gene sequences reveals a novel group of thermotolerant and thermophilic methanotrophs, Methylocaldum gen. Nov. Arch Microbiol  1997;168:493–503. 10.1007/s002030050527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Delherbe  NA, Pearce  D, But  SY  et al.  Genomic insights into moderately thermophilic methanotrophs of the genus Methylocaldum. Microorganisms  2024;12:469. 10.3390/microorganisms12030469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Maestre  FT, Benito  BM, Berdugo  M  et al.  Biogeography of global drylands. New Phytol  2021;231:540–58. 10.1111/nph.17395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_1_wraf026
Download video file (17.4MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_2_wraf026
Download video file (17.6MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_3_wraf026
Download video file (22.9MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_4_wraf026
Download video file (32.9MB, mp4)
PmoC_Methylocaldum_Type_5_wraf026
Download video file (18.1MB, mp4)
Supplementary_Material_Revision_ISMEJ-D-24-01549R2_(1)_wraf026

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the JGI-IMG/MER repository, https://img.jgi.doe.gov/mer/.


Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES