Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1984 Jul;352:129–146. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015282

Rhythmic discharge of climbing fibre afferents in response to natural peripheral stimuli in the cat.

J R Bloedel, T J Ebner
PMCID: PMC1193202  PMID: 6747886

Abstract

The rhythmicity of inferior olivary neurones evoked by natural ipsilateral forepaw inputs was evaluated in the climbing fibre afferent discharge of Purkinje cells recorded in the cerebellar cortex of the decerebrate, unanaesthetized cat. Almost 50% of all Purkinje cells responding to the forepaw stimulus with an increase in complex spike activity exhibited periodic discharge, with the dominant periodicity being between 100 and 160 ms. In ten of twenty-five neighbouring, simultaneously recorded Purkinje cells the forepaw stimulus evoked similar periodicity in their complex spike discharge. For some cells two peaks of complex spike activity were evoked by a forepaw stimulus without an obvious third peak. By altering the stimulus duration the second peak of the response was shown to be temporally uncoupled to the 'off' phase of the displacement for many cells. The interdependence of the trials contributing to the periodic peaks in the peristimulus time histogram (p.s.t.h.) was examined by a 'separation technique'. This analysis indicated that the complex spikes contributing to a specific peak in the p.s.t.h. were generated with a high degree of independence (i.e. in different trials) from the complex spikes contributing to any other peak. It was hypothesized that the independence of the rhythmic complex spike peaks is due to the long relative refractoriness following a complex spike in a single cell. Therefore, the probability of a complex spike occurring at the next one or two cycles is decreased significantly. As a consequence, an inferior olivary neurone fires usually at only one of the various peaks in response to a single presentation of the forepaw stimulus. This hypothesis predicts that stimuli evoking a complex spike at the initial peak in a high percentage of trials should give rise to less periodicity. This prediction was tested by comparing the presence or absence of evoked oscillation with the probability of evoking a complex spike in the first peak of the p.s.t.h. Cells exhibiting a probability for complex spike discharge of over 50% in the first peak showed much less periodicity than cells with a complex spike occurring in less than 50% of the trials in the first peak. These results are discussed in the context of the inferior olive being viewed as a population of coupled elements with a tendency to oscillate. The natural forepaw stimulus is hypothesized as synchronizing the phases of spontaneously oscillating climbing fibre afferents, resulting in the observed periodicity in the complex spike p.s.t.h.

Full text

PDF
129

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong B. D., Harvey R. J. Responses in the inferior olive to stimulation of the cerebellar and cerebral cortices in the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):553–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong D. M., Eccles J. C., Harvey R. J., Matthews P. B. Responses in the dorsal accessory olive of the cat to stimulation of hind limb afferents. J Physiol. 1968 Jan;194(1):125–145. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong D. M. Functional significance of connections of the inferior olive. Physiol Rev. 1974 Apr;54(2):358–417. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1974.54.2.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell C. C., Kawasaki T. Relations among climbing fiber responses of nearby Purkinje Cells. J Neurophysiol. 1972 Mar;35(2):155–169. doi: 10.1152/jn.1972.35.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloedel J. R., Ebner T. J., Yu Q. X. Increased responsiveness of Purkinje cells associated with climbing fiber inputs to neighboring neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1983 Jul;50(1):220–239. doi: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.1.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crill W. E. Unitary multiple-spiked responses in cat inferior olive nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Mar;33(2):199–209. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.2.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dupont J. L., Crepel F. Correlations among climbing fiber responses of nearby cerebellar Purkinje cells in the immature rat. Exp Brain Res. 1979;37(3):525–535. doi: 10.1007/BF00236821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ebner T. J., Bloedel J. R. Role of climbing fiber afferent input in determining responsiveness of Purkinje cells to mossy fiber inputs. J Neurophysiol. 1981 May;45(5):962–971. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.45.5.962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ebner T. J., Bloedel J. R. Temporal patterning in simple spike discharge of Purkinje cells and its relationship to climbing fiber activity. J Neurophysiol. 1981 May;45(5):933–947. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.45.5.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ebner T. J., Yu Q. X., Bloedel J. R. Increase in Purkinje cell gain associated with naturally activated climbing fiber input. J Neurophysiol. 1983 Jul;50(1):205–219. doi: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.1.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eccles J. C., Faber D. S., Murphy J. T., Sabah N. H., Táboríková H. Afferent volleys in limb nerves influencing impulse discharges in cerebellar cortex. II. In Purkynè cells. Exp Brain Res. 1971 Jul 26;13(1):36–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eccles J. C., Sabah N. H., Schmidt R. F., Táboríková H. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors influencing impulse discharges in cerebellar cortex. 3. In Purkyne cells by climbing fiber input. Exp Brain Res. 1972 Oct 29;15(5):484–497. doi: 10.1007/BF00236404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishikawa K., Kawaguchi S., Rowe M. J. Actions of afferent impulses from muscle receptors on cerebellar Purkyne cells. II. Responses to muscle contraction: effects mediated via the climbing fiber pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1972;16(1):104–114. doi: 10.1007/BF00233377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lamarre Y., Mercier L. A. Neurophysiological studies of harmaline-induced tremor in the cat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1971 Dec;49(12):1049–1058. doi: 10.1139/y71-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lamarre Y., de Montigny C., Dumont M., Weiss M. Harmaline-induced rhythmic activity of cerebellar and lower brain stem neurons. Brain Res. 1971 Sep 10;32(1):246–250. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leicht R., Rowe M. J., Schmidt R. F. Cortical and peripheral modification of cerebellar climbing fibre activity arising from cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;228(3):619–635. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Llinas R., Baker R., Sotelo C. Electrotonic coupling between neurons in cat inferior olive. J Neurophysiol. 1974 May;37(3):560–571. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.3.560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Llinás R., Volkind R. A. The olivo-cerebellar system: functional properties as revealed by harmaline-induced tremor. Exp Brain Res. 1973 Aug 31;18(1):69–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00236557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Llinás R., Yarom Y. Electrophysiology of mammalian inferior olivary neurones in vitro. Different types of voltage-dependent ionic conductances. J Physiol. 1981 Jun;315:549–567. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Llinás R., Yarom Y. Properties and distribution of ionic conductances generating electroresponsiveness of mammalian inferior olivary neurones in vitro. J Physiol. 1981 Jun;315:569–584. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy J. T., MacKay W. A., Johnson F. Differences between cerebellar mossy and climbing fibre responses to natural stimulation of forelimb muscle proprioceptors. Brain Res. 1973 Jun 15;55(2):263–289. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90295-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rubia F. J., Kolb F. P. Responses of cerebellar units to a passive movement in the decerebrate cat. Exp Brain Res. 1978 Mar 15;31(3):387–401. doi: 10.1007/BF00237297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rushmer D. S., Roberts W. J., Augter G. K. Climbing fiber responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells to passive movement of the cat forepaw. Brain Res. 1976 Apr 16;106(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90069-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sedgwick E. M., Williams T. D. Responses of single units in the inferior olive to stimulation of the limb nerves, peripheral skin receptors, cerebellum, caudate nucleus and motor cortex. J Physiol. 1967 Apr;189(2):261–279. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sotelo C., Llinas R., Baker R. Structural study of inferior olivary nucleus of the cat: morphological correlates of electrotonic coupling. J Neurophysiol. 1974 May;37(3):541–559. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.3.541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weiss M., Pellet J. Modulation of harmaline-induced rhythmic discharge of the inferior olive by juxtafastigial stimulation. Brain Res. 1981 Jun 29;215(1-2):364–368. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90518-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Montigny C., Lamarre Y. Rhythmic activity induced by harmaline in the olivo-cerebello-bulbar system of the cat. Brain Res. 1973 Apr 13;53(1):81–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90768-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES