Skip to main content
Medical Science Educator logoLink to Medical Science Educator
letter
. 2024 Sep 9;35(1):587–588. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02164-z

Integrating Higher-Order Multiple-Choice Questions into Medical Education: How Best to Support Students for Change?

Gopija Nanthagopan 1,
PMCID: PMC11933478  PMID: 40144130

Dear Editor,

The recent paper by Xiromeriti et al. in Medical Science Educator [1] highlighted the importance of developing higher-order multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to test higher-order learning. It brings about the question—if such MCQs are to be used as assessment tools, then should they also be made readily available as a study resource to students for exam practice?

In this current era, more medical students are turning to online MCQ question banks to study in favour of more traditional resources—a 2015 study of Australian medical students found that online question banks were a more popular tool for revision and learning new information, compared with textbooks [2]. Student-reported advantages of MCQs as a revision resource, compared with more traditional resources, are that their interactivity ‘staves off boredom’ and that in-built mechanisms that reward progression through questions motivate learners to continue [3]. An identified pitfall of current MCQ banks as a revision resource is that repetition of these MCQs may lead students to eventually be able to recognise the correct answer without any deeper understanding [2]; however, the utilisation of higher-order MCQs, written as per Xiromeriti et al.’s guidance, should help to mitigate this. Further research is needed to establish what types of study resources best prepare students for assessments with higher-order MCQs.

The authors aim to partially replace asynchronous written coursework such as essays with these higher-order MCQs, which also means that the marking process will be more standardised, less subjective, quicker, and more cost-effective in comparison to essay-based assessments [4]. Essay-based assessments either require expert markers or a comprehensive marking template which subsequently leads authors to write lower-order questions as these can be more easily marked a strict template, rather than higher-order questions requiring synthesis and analysis [5]. However, essay-based assessments do pose a key benefit—they uniquely allow examiners to view a trace of students’ thought processes which is particularly valuable in identifying misconceptions and facilitates more valuable feedback [4] to aid student learning.

Ultimately, it is essential to obtain students’ viewpoints on whether they feel higher-order MCQ assessments reflect the effort they have invested into studying and their knowledge because for an assessment system to considered valid students must also regard it as acceptable [6].

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Xiromeriti M, Newton PM. Solving not answering. Validation of guidance for writing higher-order multiple-choice questions in medical science education. Med  Sci  Educ. 2024. 10.1007/s40670-024-02140-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Wynter L, Burgess A, Kalman E, et al. Medical students: what educational resources are they using? BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:36. 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fisher J, Leahy D, Lim JJ, Astles E, Salvatore J, Thomson R. Question banks: credit? Or debit? A qualitative exploration of their use among medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2024. 10.1186/s12909-024-05517-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bird JB, Olvet DM, Willey JM, Brenner J. Patients don’t come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME. Med Educ Online. 2019. 10.1080/10872981.2019.1649959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Palmer EJ, Duggan P, Devitt PG, Russell R. The modified essay question: its exit from the exit examination? Med Teach. 2010. 10.3109/0142159X.2010.488705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011. 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Educator are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES