Hyperalgesic Priming in the Transition From Acute to Chronic Pain: Focus on Different Models and the Molecular Mechanisms Involved

Abstract

Poorly treated acute pain can develop into chronic pain, resulting in significant impairment of patients’ quality of life. The hyperalgesic priming model is commonly used to study how acute pain transforms into chronic pain. Inflammatory factors, small molecules, opioid receptor agonists, chemotherapy drugs, and stress serve as initiating factors in the hyperalgesic priming model. Various signaling pathways such as PKCε, MOR and ephrin-B2 pathways, and sexual differences also contribute to the transformation process of chronic pain. In this review, we examine various hyperalgesic priming models and their underlying molecular mechanisms. By thoroughly investigating these molecular mechanisms, researchers can more precisely identify the critical nodes involved in pain transformation, thereby developing more targeted treatment strategies.

Introduction

Pain is closely related to the disease’s occurrence, development, and outcome. Acute pain is a recent, short-lived pain with a clear cause. It is associated with emergency or elective surgery, trauma, burns, childbirth, natural disasters, and war.¹ Poor management of acute pain can lead to adverse effects, including increased morbidity, impaired physical function, and severe pain that may develop into chronic pain, significantly reducing patients’ quality of life.² For example, a study reported that 11 years after injury, nearly 52% of patients were suffering from chronic pain caused by burns.³ Furthermore, the economic burden attributable to work disability caused by chronic pain is estimated to reach billions of dollars, significantly exceeding the financial impact of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes.⁴ Despite the widespread occurrence of persistent pain, little is known about the underlying factors that contribute to the development of chronic pain. Currently, management for chronic pain includes exercise and psychotherapy, non-opioid pharmacological treatment, opioids, surgical treatment, and integrative treatments.⁵ While current treatments can slow the progress of chronic pain, exploring the mechanisms behind the transition from acute to chronic pain is essential for developing more effective therapies.

Hyperalgesic priming is a pain condition wherein repeated or persistent nociceptive stimuli induce structural and functional alterations in the central nervous system (CNS), leading to an increased sensitivity to subsequent painful stimuli. These modifications may encompass changes in synaptic strength, neurotransmitter release dynamics, and receptor sensitivity.^6–8 Hyperalgesic priming is considered a pivotal mechanism underlying the progression of chronic pain, comprising three distinct phases: 1) The acute phase is a brief hypersensitivity reaction caused by various nociceptive compounds, which can resolve within a week; 2) The primed phase can last for at least three weeks, during which the animal is not allergic; 3) Chronic phase can be induced by plantar injection of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) or other substances, lasting for at least two months.^7,9–12 In short, hyperalgesic priming represents a state in which the initial injury has “primed” the nervous system, making it more sensitive to subsequent painful stimuli. As hyperalgesia priming occurs before and may lead to chronic pain, using priming animal models has become the primary method for studying the transition from acute to chronic pain states.^13–15 Given the lack of a comprehensive summary of various commonly used priming animal models, in this review, we primarily discuss relevant animal models of hyperalgesia priming. We will summarize the priming states induced by various stimuli and explain the mechanisms involved.

The Establishment of Hyperalgesia Priming Model

Various pain models have been developed to investigate the mechanisms of chronic pain, including those that utilize chronic inflammation induced by complete Freund’s adjuvant or carrageenan.^16,17 The mechanisms of acute pain and chronic pain can be challenging to differentiate, making it unclear how acute pain transitions into chronic pain. The concept of hyperalgesic priming emerged from an original discussion aimed at understanding the mechanisms of acute and chronic pain separately.⁹ Researchers induced acute pain using carrageenan to investigate whether acute inflammation increases sensitivity to inflammatory mediators. Five days after the initial injection, when PGE2, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and the A2 adenosine receptor agonist CGS-21680 were injected at the same site, it was observed that the ability of carrageenan to prolong hyperalgesia induced by inflammatory mediators persisted for up to three weeks. This was in comparison to the control group that did not receive carrageenan prior to the injection of inflammatory mediators, such as PGE2.⁹ This animal model was defined as “hyperalgesic priming”.^18,19 Based on this, Levine et al first demonstrated that acute inflammatory pain increases pain sensitivity, and chronic pain can persist after re-stimulation.

Typical Stimuli of PEG2 in the Chronic Phase of Hyperalgesic Priming

To investigate the transition mechanism from acute to chronic pain, researchers used PGE2 injection at the same site as the previous injury, consistent with methods typically employed in hyperalgesic priming studies (Table 1). A single infusion of PGE2 sensitizes nociceptors, reducing the mechanical threshold within 30 minutes and returning to baseline after 60 minutes. However, in the primed model, the sensitization from PGE2 lasts longer than four hours.⁶ This priming effect was also confirmed by in vivo single-fibre electrophysiology.²⁰

Table 1.

Key Articles Discussing PGE2 as a Prolonged Trigger for Hyperalgesic Priming

Year of Publication	Injection Site	Stimuli of Acute Phase	Stimuli of Chronic Phase	DOI
20009	Intradermal injection of the dorsal hind paw	Carrageenan	PGE2, 5-HT, the A2 adenosine receptor agonist CGS-21680	10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-12-04680.2000
200319	Intradermal injection of the dorsal hind paw	Carrageenan or psi epsilon RACK	PGE2	10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00175-1
201021	Intradermal injection of the dorsal hind paw	GDNF or NGF	PGE2	10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.029
201320	The belly of the gastrocnemius muscle	Rat recombinant TNFα	PGE2	10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.004
201522	Intradermal injection of the dorsal hind paw	The repeated injection of DAMGO (the selective MOR agonist)	PGE2	10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-15.2015
201823	The plantar surface of the left hind paw	IL-6r	PGE2	10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.06.012
202324	Tail vein	Oxaliplatin	PGE2	10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002828
202425	Intraplantarly into the left hind paw	Ephrin-B2-Fc	PGE2	10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107284
202426	Intradermal injection of the dorsal hind paw	NGF	PGE2	10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1442-24.2024

Carrageenan-Induced Inflammation Primes

Chronic inflammatory pain is crucial to hyperalgesic priming, with carrageenan serving as a classic substance that induces this type of pain. The method for establishing hyperalgesic priming involves injecting 5 μL of a 1% carrageenan solution into the dorsal paw intradermally. Five days later, 100 ng of PGE2 is administered at the same site. A mechanical pain test is then performed to assess changes in pain sensitization.^9,27 Early studies indicated that the activation of protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) in the peripheral terminal of the nociceptor plays a crucial role in this model of hyperalgesic priming.^6,9,18 Although PKCε is expressed in almost all dorsal root ganglion(DRG) neurons,^28–31 the regulation of hyperalgesic priming is limited to the isolectin B4-positive (IB4 (+)) nociceptors.^21,32 In the hyperalgesic priming model, the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEB) is a key component downstream of PKCε in the cellular signaling pathway that triggers the induction of priming, playing a role in the process of chronic pain development.³³ Nearly all neurons that express CPEB are positive for IB4, and the intrathecal administration of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) targeting CPEB mRNA significantly reduced PGE2-induced hyperalgesia in rats treated with carrageenan. Additionally, the selective PKCε agonist can be inhibited by the intrathecal administration of antisense ODN targeting CPEB mRNA for 7 consecutive days, further supporting the idea that priming results from PKCε-induced activation of CPEB.³³

TNF-α regulates acute hyperalgesia by indirectly activating the release of downstream prostaglandins and sympathetic amines.^34–36 In hyperalgesic priming, TNF-α is involved by directly activating the TNFR1 receptor, which in turn activates PKCε. This indicates that blocking prostaglandin synthesis may not prevent chronic hyperalgesic priming. Additionally, it suggests that the cellular mechanisms responsible for initiating inflammation-induced chronic hyperalgesia are different from those involved in acute hyperalgesia.²⁷

Injected Repeatedly the Selective Mu-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Agonist DAMGO to Induce Primes

The hyperalgesic priming model, induced by inflammatory factors and PGE2, provides insights into the mechanism of acute-to-chronic pain transformation. However, the occurrence and development of chronic pain are not limited to inflammatory induction but also include other mechanisms, such as opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Previous studies have shown that a single injection of DAMGO does not affect nociceptive pain thresholds.^37,38 In contrast, repeated injections of DAMGO can trigger hyperalgesia and induce a potentially hyperreactive state to subsequent injections of nociceptive mediators, known here as type II hyperalgesic priming.^39,40 The operation method was as follows: DAMGO (1 μg) was injected subcutaneously into the dorsum of the rat’s hind paw every hour for three consecutive hours. The change in mechanical pain sensitization was assessed after the fourth injection of DAMGO. Subsequently, PGE2 (100 ng) was injected into the same site, and the degree of hyperalgesia was evaluated again 30 minutes and 4 hours later.²²

This model is similar to the classical hyperalgesic priming model (type I) in that it can induce prolonged mechanical hyperalgesia by co-injection of carrageenan and PGE2.⁹ The differences between these two types involve a change in signaling by PKA that contributes to type II priming instead of PKCε. Type I priming is mediated by IB4+ nociceptors, while type II priming is mediated by IB4− nociceptors.^22,32 Furthermore, bisexual dimorphism is present in type I, whereas type II priming can be induced in both males and females.^19,22 Recent studies have reported sex differences in the biological mechanisms of hyperalgesic priming. At the central nervous system (CNS) level, PGE2-induced hyperalgesic priming activates microglia in the spinal cord of both females and males, whereas P2X3/4 antagonists and p38 inhibitors only alleviate hyperalgesic priming in male mice.²³ It was discovered that the expression of prolactin receptors in Nav1.8+ neurons plays a role in triggering pain specifically in female mice.⁴¹ While these studies offer a theoretical foundation for understanding how acute pain can transform into chronic pain, much of the existing research on chronic pain still primarily focuses on male animals.⁴² The ongoing discussion of gender differences is essential for advancing personalized pain treatment.

Small Molecules Induce Primes

Recent studies have introduced hyperalgesic priming induced by small molecules, in conjunction with PEG2, alongside the classical inflammatory substances and the opioid-induced hyperalgesic priming model previously mentioned. Previous studies have shown that Ephrin-B ligands are expressed in DRG neurons and other peripheral cell types^43–45 and regulate some painful diseases, like pancreatic cancer⁴⁶ and rheumatoid and osteoarthritis.⁴⁷ However, the mechanism of the ephrin-B2-EphB signaling pathway in pain remains unclear. David et al established the hyperalgesic priming model by injecting ephrin-B2-Fc in the back paw first and PGE2 at the same site 3 days later. The researchers found that ephrin-B2 directly affects mouse and human sensory neurons, promoting nociceptor plasticity through MNK-eIF4E signaling during hyperalgesic priming, with noted gender differences in response to ephrin-B2. Female mice could only exhibit hyperalgesic priming when 100 ng of ephrin-B2-Fc was combined with PGE, while male mice could respond to 10 ng of ephrin-B2-Fc. However, the specific mechanism remains to be clarified. Furthermore, this study introduces a novel approach whereby PGE2 can serve as a stimulus to assess priming in the supradural migraine model, a concept not previously addressed in earlier research.²⁵

Recent studies have examined chronic pain through the lens of metabolomics and cellular metabolism.^48–50 Melemedjian et al developed a model of hyperalgesia priming through the co-stimulation of nerve growth factor (NGF) and PGE2. They discovered that compensatory alterations in glutamine metabolism, mediated by NGF via the ASCT2 transporter, are fundamental to the transition from acute to chronic pain states from a metabolic viewpoint. This finding highlights a new therapeutic target for pain management.²⁶

Chemotherapeutic Drugs Induce Primes

With the increasing incidence of cancer, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy(CIPN) can occur in about 25% to 30% of patients treated with chemotherapy,^51,52 resulting in a painful state lasting months to years after the end of treatment, implying a transition from acute to chronic pain in these patients.⁵³ Studies have shown that subcutaneous injection of PGE2 at 21, 42, and 60 days after oxaliplatin administration can prolong the duration of hyperalgesia. In addition, oxaliplatin combined with PGE2 caused the hyperalgesic priming to remain unattenuated at day 60, compared with oxaliplatin administration alone.²⁴ This model can be used as a reference for initiating hyperalgesic priming induced by chemotherapeutic drugs and also provides a novel direction for the mechanism study of CIPN.

Opioid analgesics are the primary treatment for patients with CIPN, but the effectiveness of opioids remains unsatisfactory due to complications like OIH.^54,55 To investigate the role of the MOR in oxaliplatin-induced hyperalgesia priming, researchers measured hyperalgesic priming by assessing the prolongation of PGE2-induced hyperalgesia in CIPN. They found that hyperalgesic priming was significantly reduced in rats treated with MOR antisense oligonucleotide (AS-ODN) compared to the control group. This suggests that hyperalgesic priming induced by oxaliplatin is dependent on the activation of MOR.⁵⁶ By studying this model and its administration, the involvement of other drug receptors in hyperalgesic priming caused by chemotherapy drugs can be further examined to generate strategies for preventing and addressing the chronic nature of CIPN.

Bee Venom Induces Primes

Bee venom is a biotoxin produced by glands in bees’ abdomens. It is a colorless, acidic substance with a distinctive odor and bitter taste.⁵⁷ In recent years, bee venom has been used to treat various diseases, including stimulating acupuncture points in patients and addressing chronic and autoimmune conditions.^58–60 Bee venom offers a range of benefits, including cellular protection, antioxidant properties, and antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anti-arthritis, anti-metastasis, and anticancer effects. However, its use is not widely promoted due to its double-edged sword nature, which can also cause pain and inflammation.^61,62

Bee venom is a widely used toxic substance that is employed to induce acute inflammatory pain.⁶² A single injection of bee venom into the plantar surface of the hind paw of the rat can trigger short-term mechanical hyperalgesia.⁶³ To explore how bee venom influences the shift from acute pain to chronic pain, Chen et al developed a hyperalgesic priming model.⁶⁴ They achieved this by injecting bee venom and PEG2 into the plantar surface of the rat’s hind paw, utilizing a modeling approach that combines inflammatory stimulants with PEG2. The specific practice involves injecting bee venom into the skin of the rat’s sole. Seven days later, an intraplantar injection of PEG2 is administered at the same site. This procedure results in lasting mechanical hyperalgesia compared to the control group. By extending the time frame, it was found that the pain stimulation effect caused by bee venom could last for 21 days or more.⁶⁴

Since the SDF1-CXCR4 signaling pathway is involved in regulating various chronic pain conditions,⁶⁵ including pain caused by spared nerve injury,⁶⁶ sciatic nerve injury,⁶⁷ and bone cancer.⁶⁸ By establishing the above model, Chen et al further confirmed that the SDF1-CXCR4 signaling pathway regulates the transition from acute pain to chronic pain.⁶⁴ The creation of this model enhances the understanding of chronic pain and offers a direction for researching the mechanisms involving biotoxins.

Acid-Induced Chronic Model of Hyperalgesia Priming Originating from the Musculoskeletal System

Musculoskeletal diseases are often accompanied by varying degrees of pain. According to statistics, about 1.75 billion people worldwide suffer from chronic musculoskeletal pain, like fibromyalgia, which seriously affects people’s daily activities.⁶⁹ Earlier models of musculoskeletal pain primarily considered short-term hyperalgesia until 2001,^70,71 when researchers introduced an animal model that simulates chronic musculoskeletal pain.⁷² The acidity of tissues is positively correlated with the level of pain.⁷³ Research on humans and animals has shown that injecting acidic solutions into muscles or tissues can induce pain.^73–75 Maximum activation of nociceptors occurs at a pH level of 5.2, while sustained activation is evident at a pH of 6.0.⁷⁶ The researchers first injected 100 μL of preservative-free, low-pH sterile saline into the gastrocnemius muscle of the rats. This injection was repeated with the same volume and pH of sterile saline on days 2, 5, and 10 at the same site. Their findings showed that repeated injections of low-pH saline into the gastrocnemius induced persistent and widespread mechanical hyperalgesia without causing movement disorders or peripheral tissue damage. Significant reductions in bilateral mechanical withdrawal thresholds were observed only on days 2 and 5 following injections with pH 4.0 saline, and not on day 10. These results indicate that the timing of repeated injections can influence the duration of the body’s pain response.⁷² Since then, a comprehensive, long-lasting model of musculoskeletal pain has been developed, providing a foundation for further research on how acute pain evolves into chronic pain in this context (Table 2). This model is commonly used to replicate chronic widespread pain (CWP) or fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) in humans.

Table 2.

Critical Articles Discussing Acid-Induced Hyperalgesic Priming

Year of Publication	Injection Site	Injection Solution	The Timing of Repeated Injections	DOI
200172	The gastrocnemius muscle of the rats	100 µL of pH 4.0 preservative-free sterile saline	2 or 5 days	10.1002/1097-4598(200101)24:1<37::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-8
200477	The lateral gastrocnemius muscle	100 µL of pH 4.0 preservative-free sterile saline	5 days	10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.01.017
201678	The left gastrocnemius muscle	20 µL of pH 4.0 preservative-free sterile saline	5 days	10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.010
201979	The left gastrocnemius muscle	The HCl-saline solution at pH = 4 (150 µL)	5 days	10.1038/s41598-019-39472-z
202480	The left gastrocnemius muscle	20 µL of pH 4.0 preservative-free sterile saline	4 days	10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae362

In the above model, administering a series of analgesics to the entire body revealed that morphine has a dose-dependent effect on mechanical hypersensitivity, particularly resulting in long-term reductions. NS1209 (a selective, competitive and potent AMPA receptor antagonist), ketamine, methetine, regabine and flupirtine were second only to morphine, but lamotrigine, carprofen and diazepam showed no significant effect, indicating that peripheral inflammatory mediators did not significantly regulate the pathophysiological processes in this model.⁷⁷ This finding aligns with the observation of fewer histological changes at the injection site after repeated injections of acid saline, suggesting that central regulation is involved in the development of acid-induced muscle pain.⁷² Moreover, pregabalin, a selective calcium channel blocker, also reduces acid-induced muscle pain,⁸¹ further enriching the study of drug effects in this model.

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is more common in women,^82–85 and acid-induced muscle hyperalgesia is also a sex-dependent manner. In male mice, hyperalgesia returned to baseline levels by day 14, while in female mice, it lasted up to 42 days.⁸⁶ Further research found that removing the ovaries alleviated mechanical allodynia induced by repeated acid solution injection, which could be reversed by intrathecal supplementation with the ovarian hormone 17 beta-oestradiol.⁷⁹ At the same time, repeated acid solution injection induced the activation of ERK in the spinal dorsal horn, and inhibition of ERK activation could reverse the abnormal mechanical pain.⁷⁹ These findings suggest the role of ovarian hormone and spinal cord ERK activation in developing chronic muscle pain induced by repeated acid solution injection and provide insight into the mechanisms of sex hormone regulation at the CNS level.

The earlier study confirmed the activation of ERK in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord associated with acid-induced chronic pain, identifying that the active ERK cells were predominantly spinal neurons or astrocytes.⁷⁹ Recent studies further determined that the spinal cord p-ERK positive cells in this hyperalgesic priming model are mainly vesicular glutamate transporter-2 positive neurons. Additionally, the p-ERK signaling pathway can further activate spinal cord astrocytes through the involvement of glutamate transporters. Activated astrocytes, in turn, affect spinal cord neurons by releasing D-serine, an intercellular interaction involved in the regulation of acid-induced muscle pain.⁸⁰ Further research is needed to clarify how astrocytes contribute to this type of pain through D-serine secretion, which should also be explored in relation to other pain types.

In addition to the role of the sex hormone-nervous system circulatory interaction in acid-induced muscle pain, researchers have found that local immune cells are also involved in regulating this pain model. Research indicates that eliminating resident macrophages in muscle tissue or suppressing their function can alleviate acid-related muscle pain, suggesting that resident macrophages in muscle tissue are involved in developing acid-induced chronic muscle pain.⁷⁸ Further studies found that the acid-induced resident macrophages secrete cytokines, including IL-4, IL-6, GM-CSF, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, and IFN-γ, suggesting that these cytokines regulate the development of chronic muscle pain.⁷⁸ Despite the ongoing research, the mechanisms by which resident macrophages regulate the up-pathway remain unclear. Future studies may provide a better understanding of the regulatory interactions between immune cells and sensory nerves in this model.

Stress-Induced Hyperalgesic Priming for Migraine-Like Pain

In 2021, about 3.4 billion people worldwide were affected by neurological disorders, with migraines being the third most common, significantly impacting health and well-being.^87,88 Recent studies have found that migraine patients have a lower pain threshold compared to individuals without migraines, making them more susceptible to pain attacks.⁸⁹ Previous attempts to induce migraines in healthy volunteers using stimulants have overlooked the specific vulnerabilities of migraine sufferers.^90,91 In contrast, research involving stimulation studies on individuals prone to migraines is becoming more relevant and realistic.^92,93

Stress is a common factor that induces migraines, and repeated stress can lead to an increase in migraine attacks, which raises the risk of transforming episodic migraines into chronic migraines.^94,95 Additionally, inhaling umbellulone can trigger cluster headaches.^96,97 Since prior studies have not investigated umbellulone in the absence of headaches, Frank et al combined stress with umbellulone to develop a new chronic transformation model of migraine-like pain.⁹⁸ The researchers exposed mice to restraint stress (RS) for two hours each day over three days to initiate a potentially sensitive pain condition. Pain sensitivity was assessed on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, and 16 following the initial RS. Baseline measurements of tactile stimuli were collected on days 16, 18, and 20 or days 16, 17, and 18 after the first RS and UMB inhalation under isoflurane anesthesia or isoflurane alone. After UMB exposure, the response frequency to tactile stimuli was tested every 30 minutes and every hour until reaching 5–6 hours, and again 24 hours after exposure. The findings revealed that repeated RS heightened pain sensitivity in both female and male rats following exposure to UMB. Previous studies indicate that painful behavior does not occur without inflammatory stimulation before inhaling substances containing UMB, suggesting that the trigeminal nervous system requires sensitization.⁹⁹ This model can be used to investigate stress-induced hyperalgesic priming for migraine-like pain.⁹⁸

Frequent migraine episodes indicate a priming phenomenon that increases susceptibility to later stimuli due to central and possibly peripheral sensitization.⁸⁹ This “two-hit” hyperalgesia priming model may contribute to transitioning from episodic migraine to chronic migraine through central sensitization.⁶ In this modality, exposure to subliminal UMB stimulates the TRPA1 receptor in the trigeminal afferent nerve.⁹⁸ Stress can activate the kappa opioid receptor (KOR), and KOR antagonists effectively block pain induced by stress.^100,101 Administering KOR antagonists before initiating RS can prevent pain from subsequent exposure to UMB events.⁹⁸ This suggests that KOR antagonists may have the potential to prevent and treat chronic migraines. Further investigation revealed that kappa opioid agonists exhibit sex-based differences in a “two-hit” priming strategy, with PRL/PRLR signaling involvement identified exclusively in females.¹⁰² Additionally, stress-induced activation of KOR in the hypothalamus raised circulating prolactin levels, which reduced trigeminal pain sensitivity.¹⁰³ These mechanisms are linked to higher prolactin levels in circulation and may contribute to the increased prevalence of migraine and higher stress responses in women.^102–105 Current clinical trials are investigating the effectiveness of KOR antagonists in preventing migraines in both sexes,^106,107 while prolactin and prolactin receptor antibodies may help improve treatment for migraines and other stress-related neurological disorders specifically in women. Future research could explore the mechanisms behind hormone-induced sex differences in migraines, providing a foundation for personalized treatment.

Limitations of Translating the Above Models to Clinical Settings

Despite significant advancements in studying the transition from acute to chronic pain using animal models, the clinical translation of hyperalgesic priming remains limited owing to its intricate molecular mechanisms. For example, the nervous systems of rodents are still quite different from those of humans, especially in higher pain-processing areas such as the cerebral cortex. Animal models often ignore the psychological, social, and environmental factors that contribute to pain, which play an important role in the human experience of pain. Analgesics that are effective in animal models may not work well or even produce adverse reactions in human clinical trials, which may be related to the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between the drugs in humans and animals. Future research needs to develop more complex and integrated animal models that combine multidisciplinary approaches (such as neuroimaging, genetics, and behavioral science) to better simulate the complexity and diversity of chronic pain in humans.

Conclusion

This review of hyperalgesic priming synthesizes existing literature to elucidate the intricate mechanisms of pain sensitization and its manifestations under various pathological conditions, thereby enhancing our understanding of pain perception and regulation. It underscores how prior pain experiences can potentiate subsequent pain responses, offering a novel perspective on the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Furthermore, the review identifies limitations in current research and suggests future directions, including the exploration of more effective intervention strategies to prevent or reverse pain sensitization. This is crucial for developing innovative methods to treat chronic pain and improving patient quality of life.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82401415).

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.