Skip to main content
Small Science logoLink to Small Science
. 2024 Oct 1;5(1):2400371. doi: 10.1002/smsc.202400371

Rigidity‐Driven Structural Isomers in the NaCl–Ga2S3 System: Implications for Energy Storage

Maria Bokova 1, Mohammad Kassem 1, Takeshi Usuki 2, Andrey Tverjanovich 3, Anton Sokolov 1, Daniele Fontanari 1, Alex C Hannon 4, Chris J Benmore 5, Igor Alekseev 1, Shinji Kohara 6, Pascal Roussel 7, Maxim Khomenko 8, Koji Ohara 9, Yohei Onodera 6, Arnaud Cuisset 1, Eugene Bychkov 1,
PMCID: PMC11935002  PMID: 40212647

Abstract

Alternative energy sources require the search for innovative materials with promising functionalities. Systems with unusual chemical properties represent an insufficiently explored domain, concealing unexpected features. Using diffraction and Raman spectroscopy over a wide temperature range, supported by first‐principles simulations, a rare phenomenon is unveiled: phase‐dependent chemical interactions between binary components in the NaCl–Ga2S3 system. In this unique occurrence, previously intact binary crystalline species transform upon melting into mixed liquid structural isomers, forming bonds with new partners. The chemical combinatorics appears to be fully reversible for stable crystals and liquids. Despite this, rapidly frozen glasses out of thermodynamic equilibrium remain in a metastable isomeric state, offering remarkable properties, particularly a high room‐temperature Na+ conductivity, comparable to the best sodium halide superionic conductors and therefore encouraging for sodium solid‐state batteries and energy applications. A rigidity paradigm is responsible for the observed phenomenon, as the extremely constrained Ga2S3 crystal lattice does not survive viscous flow, breaking up at a short‐range level. The removal of rigidity constraints and dense packing leads to a significant increase in empty space, which is the origin of high sodium diffusivity. Broadly, the rigidity‐driven structural isomerism opens up an inspiring path to the discovery of atypical materials.

Keywords: fast sodium halide conductors, network rigidity, sodium diffusion, structural isomers


A rare phenomenon—phase‐dependent chemical interactions—is observed in the eutectic NaCl–Ga2S3 system. Previously distinct binary crystalline species, NaCl and Ga2S3, transform upon melting into mixed structural isomers, forming bonds with new partners. This process is fully reversible, but supercooled liquids and glasses remain in a metastable isomeric form, offering high Na+ conductivity.

graphic file with name SMSC-5-2400371-g006.jpg

1. Introduction

Carbon neutral economy and reduction of fossil fuels for transportation require research and development in the fields of alternative energy sources and related materials. Fast alkali ion conductors for efficient high‐density solid‐state batteries represent a viable and cost‐effective path of reaching these goals.[ 1 , 2 , 3 ] Lithium and sodium halide superionic conductors have become promising electrolytes for all‐solid‐state batteries.[ 4 , 5 ] They exhibit similar high‐voltage stability, air and moisture resistance in comparison with oxide counterparts but reveal much better ionic conductivity and mechanical deformability. The best sulfide solid electrolytes show record‐holding ion transport properties and excellent cell processability; however, they suffer from insufficient chemical stability and low electrochemical window, resulting in limited performance of the solid‐state cells.

Typical alkali halide ion conductors, such as Li3InCl6 or Na3xY1xZrxCl6, are based on close‐packed or dense structures. Consequently, small Li+ cations exhibit high diffusion coefficients and room‐temperature ionic conductivity (σRT ≈ 1 mS cm−1), while larger Na+ species encounter steric hindrances and show lower ionic mobility[ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] resulting in σRT ≲ 0.01 mS cm−1. Aliovalent substitutions, optimal fraction and size of vacancies, and a decrease in crystallinity were found to be favorable factors, increasing sodium ion transport. Recently, heterogeneous sodium solid electrolytes were reported,[ 9 , 10 ] combining dense high‐coordination and amorphous low‐coordination halide frameworks, reaching σRT = 2.7 mS cm−1 with an activation energy of 0.26 eV. Nevertheless, the search for novel sodium halide superionic conductors is far from over and requires systematic studies of new systems with unusual chemical phenomena.

The common level of Na+ conductivity, σRT ≈ 0.003 mS cm−1, can also be achieved in the NaCl–Ga2S3–GeS2 glasses with quite low sodium chloride content of about 20 mol% (6.4 at% Na).[ 11 ] Similar alkali halide systems are promising for optical applications[ 12 , 13 , 14 ] and exhibit unusual structural properties: a mixed gallium and alkali environment in the vitreous state[ 15 , 16 , 17 ] in contrast to the pure sulfide or halide local structure in their crystalline counterparts. This mixed environment appears to be beneficial for the functional properties of these materials and also raises a fundamental question related to a possible difference in chemical interactions between thermodynamically stable crystalline solids and liquids, considering that glass is a frozen supercooled liquid out of thermodynamic equilibrium.

The system of interest is NaCl–Ga2S3, which exhibits a phase diagram of eutectic type,[ 18 ] implying no chemical interactions between NaCl and Ga2S3, at least in the crystalline state. However, using neutron and synchrotron diffraction, accompanied by Raman spectroscopy measurements and first‐principles simulations, we will show that the 2NaCl–Ga2S3 liquid behaves differently. The binary components (sodium chloride and gallium sesquisulfide), which remain chemically intact in the crystalline form, interact in the stable liquid, forming structural isomers, where the same atomic species have different partners. Surprisingly, the process is fully reversible, and the binary components appear to be restored, crystallizing upon either slow cooling or fast quenching. Nevertheless, the simulations reveal that the frozen supercooled liquid or glass remains in a metastable isomeric form and shows promising functional properties, in particular, high ionic conductivity and sodium diffusion, comparable to the best sodium halide superionic conductors. The excessive rigidity of crystalline gallium (III) sulfide seems to be a driving force behind its atypical chemical behavior.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Absence of Chemical Interactions Between Binary Components in Crystalline NaCl–Ga2S3

As mentioned above, the phase diagram NaCl–Ga2S3 appears to be a conventional eutectic‐type phase diagram (Figure 1a),[ 18 ] indicating no chemical interaction between the binary components. In situ high‐energy X‐ray diffraction (HE‐XRD) measurements as a function of temperature support this finding, revealing only the Bragg peaks of phase‐separated cubic NaCl (space group Fm3¯m)[ 19 ] and γ‐Ga2S3 (F4¯3m)[ 20 ] (Figure 1d,e). Above 853 K, cubic γ‐Ga2S3 transforms into the monoclinic polymorph α’‐Ga2S3 (space group Cc)[ 21 ] before melting at the eutectic temperature. The temperature of the γ−α’ transition is consistent with previous reports for pure gallium(III) sulfide.[ 20 , 22 ]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Phase diagram of NaCl–Ga2S3; b) fast cooling of the stable 2NaCl–Ga2S3 melt yields a polycrystalline mixture of NaCl/γ‐Ga2S3; HE‐XRD measurements of 2NaCl–Ga2S3 over a wide temperature range: c) normal liquid at 1053 K; d) color‐coded 2D diffraction patterns between 333 and 1223 K; e) crystalline samples at 333 and 903 K (only a low‐Q part at Q ≤ 1.7 Å−1 is shown at 903 K to reveal the characteristic (110/11¯0) and (200/1¯11) Bragg peaks of α′‐Ga2S3). The Bragg peaks of NaCl and γ‐Ga2S3 references are also displayed in (e). See also Figure S1, Supporting Information.

Fast quenching of the stable 2NaCl–Ga2S3 melt (Figure 1c) in icy water yields a polycrystalline mixture of NaCl/γ‐Ga2S3 (Figure 1b). Slow cooling produces NaCl and α′‐Ga2S3 (see the structure factors SX(Q) and total correlation functions TX(r) in Figure S2 and S3, Supporting information). Similar absence of chemical interactions was previously observed in the PbCl2–Ga2S3 system (the phase diagram of eutectic type)[ 22 ] and KI‐Ga2S3 alloys.[ 23 ]

Sodium chloride dissolution in water allows for the precise crystallographic determination of the Ga2S3 lattice constants in these two cases. As expected, the slow cooling results in the monoclinic α’‐Ga2S3 polymorph (a = 11.1269(7) Å, b = 6.4121(4) Å, c = 7.0378(4) Å, α = 90°, β = 121.189(3)°, γ = 90°), Figure 2b and S4, Supporting Information, in good agreement with the reference compound.[ 21 ] In contrast, the fast quenched 2NaCl–Ga2S3 melt generates a slightly different polymorph than the expected cubic γ‐Ga2S3.[ 20 ] Basically, the diffraction pattern cannot be fitted by a single cubic phase (Figure S5, Supporting Information), and better agreement is provided by the monoclinic lattice (space group C2/m): a = 6.218(5) Å, b = 3.6619(9) Å, c = 3.6552(10) Å, α = 90°, β = 123.50(7)°, γ = 90° (see Figure 2a and S6, Supporting Information). The hypothesis of two cubic phases with similar lattice constants is also possible (Figure S7, Supporting Information); however, the fit quality is slightly worse. Further details on the LeBail analysis can be found in the Supporting Information. In the following, we will refer to this monoclinic polymorph as γ′‐Ga2S3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

LeBail refinement and Raman spectra of a,c) fast quenched and b,d) slowly cooled 2NaCl–Ga2S3 melt following the sodium chloride dissolution in water. The dashed lines in (c) and (d) represent Raman spectrum of γ‐Ga2S3, obtained by decompression from 23.7 GPa,[ 40 ] and density functional theory (DFT) ‐ derived spectrum of α′‐Ga2S3.[ 41 ] See the text for further details.

A drastic difference between the two polymorphs was also found in the Raman spectra (Figure 2c,d); the most visible changes are related to a different width of the vibration modes.

2.2. Neutron and HE‐XRD of Liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3

Even partial melting above the eutectic temperature changes the local environment of gallium and sodium in 2NaCl–Ga2S3 (Figure S8, Supporting Information). The liquid‐like X‐ray structure factor SX(Q) at 993 K still exhibits the (022) Bragg peak of sodium chloride and remnants of the (002), (024), and (224) reflexes (Figure 3b), but the total correlation function TX(r) appears to be drastically different compared to the crystalline counterpart at 913 K (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Considering the similar atomic sizes of sulfur and chlorine, a complementary use of neutrons and hard X‐rays was necessary for diffraction studies. Neutrons are more sensitive to chlorine, b¯Cl/b¯Ga = 1.314, while X‐rays to gallium, ZCl/ZGa = 0.548, where b¯i is the neutron coherent scattering length and Zi is the atomic number.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Diffraction data of liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3: a) experimental neutron SN(Q) and b) X‐ray SX(Q) structure factors at 1073 K; the insets show isolated FSDPs (highlighted in light blue and green) and small‐angle scattering after background subtraction;[ 76 , 77 ] SX(Q) of the eutectic liquid with remaining cubic NaCl traces at 993 K is also shown in (b) by the dashed cinnamon line; experimental and FPMD‐derived c) neutron Q[SN(Q)1] and d) X‐ray Q[SX(Q)1] interference functions; the color‐coded squares represent ND and HE‐XRD data and the solid lines represent the FPMD results; fitting e) neutron TN(r) and f) X‐ray TX(r) total correlation functions using asymmetric functions for unresolved Ga–X (highlighted in green) and Na–X (light red) contributions (X = S and Cl).

Typical neutron SN(Q) and X‐ray SX(Q) structure factors of the stable liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 at 1073 K are shown in Figure 3. An overall similarity in the shape of SN(Q) and SX(Q) is noted, with characteristic differences in the amplitude and position of the first sharp diffraction peak (FSDP) at 0.8 ≤ Q0 ≤ 1.0 Å−1. The higher FSDP intensity in SX(Q) seems to be related to a greater involvement of the Ga‐related partial structure factors SGaX(Q) in the FSDP, as their Q‐dependent X‐Ray weighting coefficients are larger than the neutron counterparts, wGaXX(Q) > wGaXN, where X = Ga, S, and Na. The only exception is wGaClX(Q). Multiple contributions to the FSDP with contrasting weightings explain the difference in position for neutrons (Q0N = 1.0 Å−1) and X‐rays (Q0X = 0.8 Å−1) at 1073 K.

Additionally, temperature‐dependent small‐angle X‐Ray scattering (SAXS) at Q < 0.8 Å−1 is observed, while small‐angle neutron scattering is hardly visible at low Q, partly due to the different Qmin values: 0.2 Å−1 for HE‐XRD and 0.5 Å−1 for neutron diffraction (ND). Mesoscopic inhomogeneity associated with Ga could explain the SAXS contribution.

The correlation functions in r‐space were obtained using the usual Fourier transform

TN/X(r)=4πρ0r+2π0QmaxQ[SN/X(Q)1]sin(Qr)M(Q)dQ (1)

where TN/X(r) is the neutron or X‐ray total correlation function, ρ0 is the number density, and M(Q) is the Lorch modification function. In contrast to polycrystalline mixtures NaCl/α′‐Ga2S3 and NaCl/γ‐Ga2S3, which exhibit well‐separated Ga–S and Na–Cl nearest‐neighbor (NN) peaks at 2.24–2.28 and 2.9 Å, respectively, and the coordination numbers NGaS = 4 and NNaCl = 6 (Figure S2 and S3, Supporting Information), both TN(r) and TX(r) of liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 are different (Figure 3e,f). As expected, the NN peaks are broad and unresolved. However, a simple 3‐peak Gaussian fitting of TN(r), assuming Ga–S NNs at 2.28 Å, Na–Cl NNs at 2.79 Å, and unresolved second neighbors at 3.7 Å, yields unrealistic and astonished values of NGaS = 5.3 and NNaCl = 1.2. In other words, the model suggesting the absence of chemical interactions between Ga2S3 and NaCl in the liquid phase, following the phase diagram, is incorrect. The obtained values of coordination numbers and a strong N/X contrast for the constituent species assume the exchange reactions, which can be rationalized as follows: Na–Cl + Ga–S ⇄ Na–S + Ga–Cl. Consequently, the NN peak at 2.28 Å would contain Ga–S and Ga–Cl contributions, and the NN peak at 2.79 Å consists of Na–Cl and Na–S correlations.

The appropriate fitting of both TN(r) and TX(r) functions faces two major difficulties: 1) the asymmetric shape of the NN peaks, partly related to similar but not identical contributions of Ga–S (2.20–2.35 Å)[ 17 , 21 , 24 , 25 ] and Ga–Cl (2.10–2.34 Å),[ 26 , 27 ] as well as Na–Cl (2.66–2.90 Å)[ 19 , 28 ] and Na–S (2.77–2.90 Å)[ 29 , 30 , 31 ] correlations, and 2) the unknown ratio of Ga–S/Ga–Cl and Na–Cl/Na–S populations. As a first step, fitting with symmetric functions was used, varying the Cl/S proportion for both gallium and sodium local environment, which was set to be identical for neutron and X‐rays. Then, the best values of Ga–S/Ga–Cl and Na–Cl/Na–S ratios were constrained, allowing fitting with asymmetric functions. The derived results are shown in Figure 3e,f and collected in Table 1 . Gallium and sodium were found to be fourfold coordinated with different fractions of the Cl/S mixed neighbors. Gallium predominantly possesses a sulfide environment (82%), while sodium has slightly more Cl NNs (53%).

Table 1.

Interatomic distances rij (Å) and coordination numbers Nij in liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 derived from the least‐square fitting of the experimental datasets and first‐principles molecular dynamics.

S−S Ga−S Ga−Cl Ga−Ga
NGaX
Na−Cl Na−S
NNaX
rij
Nij
rij
Nij
rij
Nij
rij
Nij
rij
Nij
rij
Nij
ND
2.28a) 3.29 2.28a) 0.70 3.99 2.73b) 2.1 2.73b) 1.9 4.0
HE‐XRD
2.28a) 3.22 2.28a) 0.68 3.90 2.77b) 2.0 2.77b) 1.8 3.8
FPMD
2.08 0.08 2.24c) 3.23c) 2.23c) 0.60c) 2.40 0.09 3.92 2.67d) 2.6d) 2.83d) 1.8d) 4.4d)
a)

Unresolved contributions of the Ga−S and Ga−Cl NN correlations;

b)

Unresolved contributions of strongly asymmetric Na−Cl and Na−S NN contacts;

c)

Slightly asymmetric peaks;

d)

Strongly asymmetric peaks; the uncertainties in Ga–X and Na–X distances are ±0.02 and ±0.05 Å, respectively; the uncertainties in gallium and sodium local coordination are ±0.05 and ±0.20.

We should note a different shape of asymmetric Na–X NN correlations for neutrons and hard X‐rays. A more intense unresolved contribution at lower r in the TN(r) function suggests that the maximum of the Ga–Cl NN contacts is slightly shifted to lower distances compared to that of the Na–S counterparts. This difference is associated with a dissimilar sensitivity of neutrons and X‐rays: b¯Cl/b¯S = 3.364 and ZCl/ZS = 1.0625.

2.3. FPMD of Liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3

The applied Born–Oppenheimer molecular dynamics in the generalized gradient approximation,[ 32 ] using the hybrid exchange‐correlation functional PBE0[ 33 , 34 ] (GGA–PBE0), appears to be efficient and precise for liquid 2NaClGa2S3, as for other chalcogenide and chalcohalide systems.[ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] The first‐principles molecular dynamics (FPMD)‐derived neutron and X‐ray interference functions Q[SN/X(Q)1], shown in Figure 3c,d, reveal good agreement with the experimental data both in amplitude and position of the diffraction features. We should also note an enhanced SAXS signal in computed data, although the size of the simulation box (24.92 × 24.92 × 24.92 Å3), containing 495 atoms, seems to be insufficient to capture mesoscopic inhomogeneities. An approximate nonuniform distribution of the components can be observed in snapshots of the simulation box (Figure 4a–c).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

FPMD simulation box containing 495 atoms (110 Na, 110 Cl, 110 Ga, and 165 S): a) full box, b) Ga and S species, c) Na and Cl distributions; experimental and FPMD‐derived d) neutron gN(r) and e) X‐ray gX(r) pair‐distribution functions; the color‐coded squares represent experimental data and the solid lines denote the FPMD results; partial pair‐distribution functions for f) Ga–S, Ga–Cl, Ga–Ga, and S–S atomic pairs, and g) Na–Cl, Na–S, and Na–Na correlations for stable liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3.

As expected, the FPMD real‐space functions also closely resemble the ND and HE‐XRD experimental results (Figure 4d,e). The derived Ga–X and Na–X partial pair‐distribution functions gij(r) (Figure 4f,g) are consistent with the previous analysis, indicating a mixed gallium and sodium environment in liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 (Table 1). Additionally, the NN peak at 2.28 Å contains a small fraction of S–S (NSS = 0.08) and Ga–Ga (NGaGa = 0.09) homopolar bonds. These contributions at 2.08 and 2.40 Å, respectively, are not visible in experimental data due to their weak amplitude.

Local coordination of gallium, sulfur, and chlorine is shown in Figure 5 . The average gallium coordination, NGaX = 3.92 ± 0.05 (Table 1), indicates a predominant contribution of fourfold coordinated Ga4F species (91 ± 3%). The fraction of trigonal gallium Ga3F is significantly lower (6 ± 3%), while the population of other under‐ and overcoordinated Ga atoms is statistically irrelevant.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

FPMD‐derived local coordination in liquid 2NaClGa2S3 at 1100 K: coordination number distributions of a) sulfur NSGa, b) gallium NGaX (X = S, Cl, Ga), and c) chlorine NClGa; d) chlorine index: number of Cl species in mixed GaS4mSm tetrahedra. The insets show sulfur triclusters, bridging chlorine, and mixed tetrahedron GaS2Cl2.

The twofold sulfur coordination S2F is clearly dominant (70 ± 3%). Sulfur triclusters, that is, trigonal sulfur S3F connected to three Ga central atoms (see the inset in Figure 5a), constitute the second most populated species (26 ± 3%). The fraction of terminal S(t) hardly exceeds the statistical limit. In contrast, terminal chlorine Cl(t) is overwhelmingly populated (97 ± 2%), while twofold coordinated bridging Cl(b) species (the inset in Figure 5c) appear to be negligibly small. One half of GaX4 tetrahedra lack chlorine (Figure 5d). The remaining part is subdivided into two groups: the population of GaS3Cl units (36 ± 2%) is markedly higher than that of GaS2Cl2 entities (14 ± 2%).

As previously reported for sodium sulfide and sodium chloride systems,[ 28 , 30 , 31 ] all real‐space partial functions gNaX(r) are strongly asymmetric. The prominent asymmetry observed in both experimental (Figure 3e,f) and FPMD‐derived Na–Cl and Na–S correlations (Figure 4g) complicates the precise determination of sodium local coordination. Several approaches were used. 1) Taking Na–Cl and Na–S crystalline cutoffs in cubic sodium chloride and sulfide (3.35 Å), the average sodium coordination appears to be NNaX = 3.7. 2) Extending the cutoff to 3.56 Å, representing the border value between nearest (Na–Cl, Na–S) and second (Na–Na, Na–Ga) neighbors, yields NNaX = 4.2. 3) Finally, the observed minimum in real‐space partials gNaX(r) or TNaX(r) at 4.0 Å suggests NNaX = 5.2. Considering the above estimations, the best assessment of the sodium local coordination appears to be NNaX = NNaCl + NNaS = 2.6 + 1.8 = 4.4 ± 0.3. This value is consistent with sodium coordination in liquid NaCl, 4.7 ± 0.1,[ 28 ] and Na2S, 4.0 ± 0.2,[ 31 ] and slightly larger than the experimental fitting results (Table 1). Additionally, there is a difference in the higher proportion of the FPMD‐derived Na–Cl environment (59%) versus the experimental data analysis (53%).

The different shape of experimental unresolved Na–X NN correlations in TN(r) and TX(r) datasets (Figure 3), attributed to a shift of the Na–Cl maximum to lower r, is confirmed by FPMD. The Na–Cl and Na–S partials are peaked at 2.67 and 2.83 Å, respectively (Table 1). Additionally, the Na–Cl value is consistent with that in molten sodium chloride.[ 28 ]

Sodium coordination distribution reveals multiple environments (Figure 6 ). The major contribution yields fourfold coordinated species Na4F−X (37 ± 9%), followed by fivefold (32 ± 10%) and trigonal (17 ± 6%) sodium. The last statistically relevant fraction is Na6F−X (10 ± 6%). A significant uncertainty in coordination distribution, compared to Ga and S (Figure 5), is presumably related to fast sodium dynamics. Mixed chloride and sulfide neighbor fractions for Na[ClnS4n] and Na[ClnS5n] species are also shown in Figure 6b,c. A negligible (4 ± 1%) and small (15 ± 5%) populations of pure sulfide NaS4/NaS5 and chloride NaCl4/NaCl5 surroundings should be noted; the mixed sodium environment is predominant.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

a) FPMD‐derived sodium coordination distributions in liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 at 1100 K; mixed sodium environment in b) Na[ClnS4n], and (c) Na[ClnS5n] entities.

2.4. Raman Spectroscopy and DFT Modeling of 2NaCl–Ga2S3

The Raman spectra of 2NaCl–Ga2S3 solids and liquids over a wide temperature range from 294 to 1113 K are shown in Figure 7 . The Raman spectra of quenched and heated solids exhibit broad spectral features resembling those of monoclinic γ′‐Ga2S3 (space group C2/m), also obtained by fast quenching following NaCl and other soluble species dissolution in water.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

a) Raman spectra of 2NaClGa2S3 over a wide temperature range; b) typical spectrum of normal liquid at 1113 K in comparison with glassy (KCl)0.6(Ga2S3)0.32(GeS2)0.08 at room temperature; spectra of solid 2NaClGa2S3 at c) 973 K and d) 294 K in comparison with monoclinic α′‐Ga2S3 (space group Cc) and γ′‐Ga2S3 (space group C2/m), respectively.

Considering that the observed Bragg peaks only belong to sodium chloride and gallium(III) sulfide, the soluble residue should be amorphous. It is worth noting extended glass‐forming domains occur in the MCl–Ga2S3–GeS2 systems, where M = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs (Figure S9, Supporting Information)[ 15 , 39 ] In addition, bulk 2MCl–Ga2S3 glasses can be easily obtained with heavy alkali chlorides RbCl and CsCl.[ 15 , 24 , 39 ] The amorphous contribution is also visible in the X‐Ray structure factors of semicrystalline 2NaCl–Ga2S3 alloys (Figure 1e, S2 and S3, Supporting Information).

The shape of the Raman spectra of solid samples evolves with increasing temperature; however, the characteristic features remain intact, with only changes in the relative amplitude. In contrast to diffraction data, the polymorphic γα phase transition above 853 K is hardly observable in the Raman spectra, except for a distinct decrease in intensity of the high‐frequency Ga–S stretching at ≈430 cm−1 and Ga–S bending at ≈170 cm−1, with a simultaneous appearance of A'(4)/A'(5) bending modes of α'‐Ga2S3 at ≈150 cm−1.[ 40 , 41 ]

A drastic evolution occurs above the melting point. First, the intense low‐frequency Ga–S stretching in the vicinity of 250 cm−1 disappears completely. This mode originates from the A(6) stretching[ 40 , 41 ] in monoclinic α′‐Ga2S3 and related compounds and/or nanocrystals. The remaining poorly resolved multimodal features between 260 and 440 cm−1 are similar to those in MCl‐rich glasses, such as (KCl)0.6(Ga2S3)0.32(GeS2)0.08, also shown in Figure 7b. In addition, a very broad feature centered at 190 cm−1 replaces the three peaks below 280 cm−1.

Density Functional Theory (DFT) modeling using size‐limited Ga–S, Ga–S–Cl, and related clusters appears to be useful to identify the observed vibrations. Figure 8 reveals experimental and DFT Raman spectra for two contrasting cases: semicrystalline and liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 at 294 and 1113 K, respectively. The DFT‐optimized clusters, derived from the FPMD simulations, consistently reproduce the characteristic vibrations. An intense bimodal broad feature of the semicrystalline sample, centered at ≈350 cm−1, contains symmetric and asymmetric Ga–S stretching in CS–Ga2S7 and ES–Ga2S6 dimers, involving either bridging or “terminal” sulfur species, respectively. The “terminal” sulfur atoms are, in fact, also bridging because they are bound to terminal H species, not shown in Figure 8. This bimodal feature also contains symmetric Ga–S breathing at 349 cm−1 of the inner cage of the cubane‐type Ga4S8 cluster, formed by fourfold coordinated Ga4F and trigonal S3F atoms. High‐frequency modes, centered at ≈400 cm−1, are associated with asymmetric (399 cm−1) and symmetric (415 cm−1) gallium−“terminal” sulfur stretching in the cubane‐like entity, which reproduces the most rigid part of gallium (III) sulfide lattice.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Experimental and DFT Raman spectra of a–c) semicrystalline and d–f) liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 at 294 K and 1113 K, respectively; and size‐limited clusters: a) CS–Ga2S7H6, b) ES–Ga2S6H4, c) Ga4S8H4, d) CS–Ga2Cl2S5Na2H2, e) CS–Ga2Cl2S5Na2H, f) Na4Cl4; the optimized clusters are shown in the insets. The terminal H species are not displayed, and the H‐related vibrations were removed from the DFT spectra. Two types of Na–Cl stretching are shown in (f): the solid line represents the vibrations of a Na4Cl4 cube of Td symmetry with the Na–Cl distances of 2.7 Å; the dashed line corresponds to a weighted average of the symmetric Na–Cl stretching in Na4Cl4 cubes possessing the Na–Cl bond distance distribution taken from FPMD modeling.

A multimodal aspect of the stretching feature in the stable liquid at 1113 K assumes several contributions. Mixed corner‐ and edge‐sharing dimers (Figure 8, and S10, Supporting Information) reasonably well describe the observed vibrations, consisting of symmetric and asymmetric Ga–S and Ga–Cl stretching modes between 260 and 440 cm−1. In particular, the most intense peak at 311 cm−1 (Figure 8d) corresponds to symmetric in‐phase Ga–S stretching in CS–Ga2Cl2S5Na2; the feature at 334 cm−1 (Figure 8e) is a combined in‐phase asymmetric Ga–Cl stretching and symmetric vibration of a Ga–S–Ga bridge in another structural isomer CS–Ga2Cl2S5Na2. A distinct mode at 380 cm−1 and its high‐frequency tail consists of multiple combined stretching of Ga–S(t), Ga–Cl, and/or Ga–S(b) bonds in CS and ES units, where S(t) and S(b) labels denote real terminal and bridging sulfur in Na‐containing entities. The most intense frequencies and their assignments are collected in Table S1, Supporting Information.

The emerging broad feature at 190 cm−1 (Figure 8e,f) is associated with Na–Cl and Na–S stretching, as it reveals vibrations of the Na4Cl4 cluster of the Td symmetry. A weighted average of the Na–Cl breathing frequencies in Na4Cl4 clusters, reproducing the FPMD‐derived distribution of the Na–Cl NN distances (Figure 4g), yields a broad Na–Cl stretching mode resembling experimental results. Similar Na–S stretching modes were observed in crystalline Na2S and vitreous Na2S–GeS2 alloys.[ 31 , 42 , 43 ] Sodium‐containing clusters, such as CS–Ga2Cl2S5Na2 (the inset in Figure 8e), also reveal Na–Cl and Na–S vibrations in the vicinity of 200 cm−1; however, their intensity is smaller compared to Ga–S or Ga–Cl stretching.

Basically, the Raman data confirm a significant distinction in the short‐ and intermediate‐range structure between the solid and liquid phases of 2NaCl–Ga2S3, and the absence of crystal‐like atomic arrangements of gallium (III) sulfide above the melting temperature. These results align perfectly with the diffraction experiments and FPMD simulations.

2.5. Sodium Diffusion in Liquid and Vitreous 2NaCl–Ga2S3

Amazingly fast sodium diffusion was found in 2NaClGa2S3 over a wide temperature range. Mean‐square displacements (MSD) of atomic species, ri2(t), were used to compute the diffusion coefficients Di

ri2(t)=1Ni{i=1Ni[ri(t)ri(0)]2} (2)

where ri(t) and ri(0) are the positions of particle i at time t and the initial time, respectively, and Ni represents the total number of particles in the simulation box, and the angle brackets denote the average over initial times.

Typical MSD of sodium, chlorine, gallium, and sulfur in the high‐temperature liquid (1400 K) and vitreous solid (400 K) are shown in Figure 9 . Below 30 fs, the ballistic regime[ 44 ] is observed, rNa2(t)ts, where the power‐law exponent s = 2. Above 1 ps at high temperatures, the atomic species reveal a diffusion regime, s = 1, with the highest sodium diffusion coefficient DNa. Surprisingly, the chlorine MSD is only by a factor of 2 lower than rNa2(t), while rGa2(t) and rS2(t) are smaller by one order of magnitude. With decreasing temperature, both gallium and sulfur gradually lose the diffusive motion, while sodium remains mobile up to 400 K. It should be noted that the expected glass transition temperature Tg for 2NaCl–Ga2S3 appears to be about 480 K, extrapolating the Tg values in the NaCl–Ga2S3–GeS2 glassy system as well as those for 2MCl–Ga2S3 glasses, were M = Rb, Cs.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Atomic dynamics in liquid and glassy 2NaCl–Ga2S3: a) mean‐square displacements ri2(t) of Na (red), Cl (green), Ga (dark green), and S (dark yellow) at 400 and 1400 K on a log‐log scale; rNa2(t) on a linear scale at b) 1400 K and c) 400 K. The characteristic slopes s for the ballistic regime (s = 2) and diffusive behavior (s = 1) are presented in (a) by the dash‐dot‐dot and dashed‐dotted lines, respectively. The calculated sodium diffusion coefficients DNa are also indicated in (b) and (c).

The Einstein equation was applied to calculate the diffusion coefficients

Di=16limtri2(t)t (3)

The derived sodium diffusivity DNa in normal and supercooled liquid, and vitreous 2NaCl–Ga2S3 are shown in Figure 10 together with that in liquid NaCl, calculated from the ionic conductivity σi data[ 45 ] using the Nernst–Einstein relation

Dσ=kBT(Ze)2x1σi (4)

where Dσ is the diffusion (conductivity) coefficient, Ze the electric charge of the carrier ion, x the mobile ion concentration, and kB and T are the Boltzmann constant and temperature, respectively. The Haven ratio[ 46 ] HR=(DNa+DCl)/Dσ was assumed to be HR=1 and DNa=1.5DCl.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

a) Experimental and calculated sodium diffusion coefficients DNa in liquid and glassy 2NaCl–Ga2S3 (this work, FPMD), liquid[ 45 ] and solid[ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ] sodium chloride, and glassy NaCl–Ga2S3–GeS2 (this work, 22Na tracer diffusion). Sodium diffusion coefficients for liquid 3NaCl–YCl3 (FPMD),[ 47 ] and solid Na+ superionic conductors Na2.88(Sb,W)S4 and NaCl–SmCl3–TaCl5, recalculated from the ionic conductivity,[ 10 , 53 ] are also plotted. b) Bader charges and c) microscopic voids in liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3, cubic and liquid NaCl. Further details can be found in the text.

We note a close similarity between the sodium diffusion coefficients in the two liquids (2NaCl–Ga2S3 and NaCl), as well as in a promising Na+ halide ion conductor 3NaCl–YCl3 in the liquid state.[ 47 ] In contrast to sodium chloride, whose ionic conductivity and the 22Na and/or 24Na tracer diffusion decreases by four orders of magnitude below the melting point,[ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ] supercooled and glassy 2NaCl–Ga2S3 follows Arrhenius behavior up to 400 K. Additionally, the extrapolation to 298 K yields the room‐temperature conductivity σRT = 2.1 mS cm−1 with the activation energy of 0.249 eV. The derived σRT is only by a factor of 15 lower than that in one of the best sodium sulfide superionic conductors, i.e., Na2.88(Sb,W)S4 (32 mS cm−1 and 0.177 eV),[ 53 ] and comparable with the Na+ conductivity (2.7 mS cm−1 and 0.26 eV) and sodium diffusion in the record‐holding hybrid sodium chloride solid electrolyte (Na0.75Sm1.75Cl6)0.62(NaTaCl6)0.38.[ 10 ]

In order to verify whether the FPMD‐derived sodium ion transport in vitreous 2NaCl–Ga2S3 appears to be reasonable, we undertook sodium tracer diffusion measurements for similar sulfochloride glasses, NaCl–Ga2S3–GeS2, which exhibit good chemical and thermal stability.[ 11 ] The experimental 22Na tracer diffusion coefficients for a (NaCl)0.2(Ga2S3)0.16(GeS2)0.64 alloy over the temperature range from 427 to 525 K are shown in Figure 10, while the diffusion profiles and further details of the tracer measurements are given in the Supporting Information (Figure S11, Supporting Information and the related text). The obtained sodium diffusion is lower for this NaCl‐poor glass (6.41 at% Na) compared to the more concentrated vitreous 2NaCl–Ga2S3 (22.22 at% Na) but much higher compared to cubic NaCl reference, DNa(glass)/DNa(c‐NaCl) ≳ 1010! The diffusion activation energy, 0.44 ± 0.05 eV, and the Haven ratio, HR = 0.32 ± 0.07, are also consistent with comparable Na+ and Ag+ conducting vitreous alloys.[ 31 , 54 ] In addition, the extrapolation of ionic conductivity and 22Na tracer diffusion parameters of NaCl–Ga2S3–GeS2 glasses yields the expected results for glassy 2NaCl–Ga2S3 (Figure S12, Supporting Information). Consequently, the FPMD‐derived ion transport appears to be coherent with available experimental data. Our preliminary first‐principles modeling of liquid NaCl also yields sodium and chlorine diffusion coefficients consistent with the reported conductivity data[ 45 ] (Figure S13, Supporting Information).

The question arises: what is the origin of high Na+ ion conductivity in 2NaCl–Ga2S3? Two possible reasons can be considered: 1) available empty space for sodium migration, and 2) low barriers for sodium mobility.

The available empty space can be determined by calculating the fraction of microscopic voids and cavities in 2NaCl–Ga2S3 using the Dirichlet–Voronoi tessellation method.[ 55 ] Typical snapshots of the simulation boxes with derived voids are shown in Figure 10c. The relative volume of voids normalized to the box size appears to be quite large, Vc/V0 = 46 ± 5%, for liquid 2NaClGa2S3, ensuring enough space for ion migration and high mobility. A similar Vc/V0 = 35 ± 4% value was found in molten NaCl, which exhibits comparable sodium diffusion. In contrast, in crystalline sodium chloride, there are no microscopic voids if the radius of the test particle is above 2.5 Å (in our calculations, the radius was taken as 2.7 Å, corresponding to the Na–Cl interatomic distance in NaCl and 2NaCl–Ga2S3 liquids, as recommended for the Dirichlet–Voronoi method[ 55 ]). This last result aligns with a drastic drop in sodium diffusion of four orders of magnitude for cubic sodium chloride just below the melting point.

The Bader charges[ 56 ] on sodium, chlorine, and sulfur reflect electrostatic interactions between sodium cations and anions, and could affect the mobility barriers. Previously, energy landscapes with low barriers for alkali ion migration were derived for lithium and sodium halide superionic conductors,[ 5 , 6 , 7 , 57 ] as well as intrinsic frustration in the chemical bond dynamics, leading to increased cation mobility.[ 58 ]

The calculated sodium qNa and chlorine qCl Bader charges for liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3, crystalline, and molten sodium chloride are shown in Figure 10b. The data for cubic NaCl are consistent with the reported results:[ 59 ] qNa = + 0.857 ± 0.005 and qCl = −0.857 ± 0.005, and slightly lower than those in the NaCl melt: +0.869 ± 0.005 and −0.869 ± 0.004, respectively. The sodium charge in liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3, qNa = + 0.871 ± 0.010, is very similar to that in molten sodium chloride, suggesting that chlorine and sulfur species in the vicinity of sodium have similar charges, confirmed by the qS values (Figure S14, Supporting Information). In contrast, the chlorine charges in 2NaCl–Ga2S3 exhibit two different populations: chlorine connected to sodium reveals qCl(Na) = −0.861 ± 0.005 while qCl(Ga) = −0.653 ± 0.017. The Bader charges on gallium and chlorine in gallium trichloride liquid at 400 K (Figure S15, Supporting Information) are consistent with this result.

The derived Bader charges appear to be sensitive to variations in electronic density in the vicinity of specific atom species but seem to be unaffected by the ionic mobility of NNs and vice versa. Nevertheless, a lower average Bader charge qCl = −0.74 in isomeric 2NaCl–Ga2S3 may lead to lower barriers in the presumably saddle‐shaped energy landscape near Ga–Cl sites, facilitating faster Na+ migration. Additionally, the magnitude of empty space nicely reflects trends in fast ion transport.

2.6. Rigidity‐Driven Isomerism as a Searching Strategy for Fast Vitreous Sodium Halide Conductors

The excessive rigidity of crystalline Ga2S3 is caused by tetrahedral gallium coordination and a significant fraction of sulfur triclusters S3F (constituting two‐thirds of all sulfur species). Consequently, the average local coordination in c‐Ga2S3 is r = 3.2. The excessively rigid crystalline gallium (III) sulfide does not survive the viscous flow, breaking up on a local scale. Raman spectroscopy provides a clear illustration of this process near the melting point, between 873 and 1073 K (see Figure 7a). The disappearance of the high‐frequency Ga–S stretching feature at 400 ≲ ω ≲ 430 cm−1 and the decrease in vibrational intensity at around 350 cm−1 above the eutectic temperature are associated with a sudden reduction in the population of sulfur triclusters. The S3F containing units are represented by the cubane‐type Ga4S8 entity in DFT modeling (Figure 8c). This reduction is also confirmed by FPMD. The fraction of S3F species in liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 at 1100 K is only 26 ± 3% (Figure 5a) instead of 67%. The diminished S–Ga atomic pairs are substituted by Cl–Ga contacts while maintaining tetrahedral Ga coordination intact. These structural changes lead to a much less constrained gallium subnetwork with an average coordination number r = 2.53. The derived average coordination in the stable 2NaCl–Ga2S3 liquid appears to be close to the optimally constrained disordered network with r = 2.4,[ 60 , 61 , 62 ] originating from the Maxwell–Calladine index theorem.[ 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ]

The appearance of new partners (chlorine for gallium and sulfur for sodium) in the stable liquid signifies the structural isomerism in the NaCl–Ga2S3 system, which is fully reversible upon crystallization. The emerging structural isomers in the stable liquid are significantly less dense compared to gallium (III) sulfide and sodium chloride binaries (Figure S16, Supporting Information). The additional empty space is favorable for fast Na+ transport in the liquid but, more importantly, can be frozen in a metastable glassy isomer with a mixed gallium and sodium environment, as revealed by our FPMD simulations and experimental reports on alkali halide gallium sulfide glasses.[ 15 , 16 , 17 ]

The FPMD‐predicted high Na+ conductivity may be realized in a series of sodium halide glasses formed by chalcogenides of Group 13 elements (Al, Ga, In), which exhibit similar rigid crystal lattices as Ga2S3 and, therefore, are potential candidates for rigidity‐driven structural isomerism. Thallium chalcogenides and telluride systems seem to be exceptions to this assumption. Fully vitreous alloys were not reported for sodium halide–A2X3 systems, where A = Al, Ga, In and X = S, Se. Small additions of Group 14 chalcogenides (Si, Ge, Sn) might be beneficial for improving the glass‐forming ability while presumably keeping high Na+ conductivity intact.

3. Conclusions

A rare phenomenon—phase‐dependent chemical interactions between binary components—was investigated for stable crystals and liquids in the eutectic system NaCl–Ga2S3 using diffraction and Raman spectroscopy over a wide temperature range from 294 to 1223 K, supported by first‐principles simulations. In the crystalline state of a nearly eutectic composition 2NaCl–Ga2S3, both sodium chloride and gallium (III) sulfide remain chemically intact in accordance with the phase diagram. The only change was associated with a polymorphic transition from cubic γ‐Ga2S3 to the monoclinic α'‐form above 853 K, occurring in the same temperature range as for pure Ga2S3.

In contrast, the combined use of pulsed ND and high‐energy X‐ray scattering reveals strong chemical interactions in the stable 2NaCl–Ga2S3 liquid, where gallium and sodium species become connected to new partners, chlorine and sulfur, respectively, forming structural isomers of the crystalline binaries. This process is fully reversible; both slow cooling or fast quenching of molten 2NaCl–Ga2S3 yield polycrystalline mixtures of either NaCl/α'‐Ga2S3 or NaCl/γ'‐Ga2S3, where γ'‐Ga2S3 is a distorted monoclinic polymorph (space group C2/m) of the cubic γ‐Ga2S3 form.

The rigidity paradigm appears to be the driving force behind the observed phenomenon. The excessively rigid crystalline Ga2S3, composed of tetrahedral gallium species and threefold coordinated sulfur triclusters S3F (constituting two‐thirds of all sulfur species), with the average local coordination number r = 3.2, does not survive the viscous flow and breaks up on a local scale. Raman spectroscopy measurements below and above the melting point, supported by DFT modeling of vibrational properties, demonstrate a drastic reduction in the population of sulfur triclusters in both eutectic and normal NaCl–Ga2S3 liquids. FPMD confirms this finding, revealing a strongly diminished S3F fraction, 26 ± 3%, and a reduced r = 2.53. This derived average coordination appears to be close to the optimally constrained disordered network with r = 2.4.

Unexpectedly, the FPMD simulations predict fast sodium diffusion in the stable and supercooled 2NaCl–Ga2S3 liquid, as well as in a frozen isomeric glass, comparable with the best sodium halide superionic conductors. The conductivity reaches 2.1 mS cm−1 at room temperature with an activation energy of 0.249 eV. Experimental 22Na tracer diffusion measurements on similar sulfochloride glasses with lower NaCl content have shown the sodium diffusion coefficients higher than those in crystalline NaCl by ten orders of magnitude. Extrapolating these values to the 2NaCl–Ga2S3 composition yields the FPMD‐predicted sodium diffusion and Na+ conductivity parameters. A significant fraction of empty space in the disordered lattice, resulting from the removal of rigidity constraints and dense packing, as calculated using Dirichlet–Voronoi tessellation, is the origin of high sodium diffusivity. Consequently, the rigidity‐driven structural isomerism open up a searching strategy for the discovery of novel glassy sodium halide fast ion conductors, promising for solid‐state batteries and energy applications.

The outstanding question in this context remains the experimental verification of the searching strategy, which involves synthesizing sodium halide‐rich structural isomers in NaY–A2X3–BX2 glassy systems, where Y = Cl, Br, I; A = Ga, In; B = Ge, Sn; and X = S, Se. These isomers are expected to exhibit high sodium conductivity (about 1 mS cm−1), good chemical stability, and wide electrochemical window, advancing R&D in the field of efficient high‐density solid‐state batteries.

4. Experimental Section

4.1.

4.1.1.

Synthesis

Chalcohalide compositions in the NaCl–Ga2S3 and NaCl–Ga2S3–GeS2 systems were prepared by classical melt quenching from high purity elements (Ga, Ge, and S, 99.999%, Neyco or Acros Organics) and sodium chloride (99.85%, Acros Organics). The mixtures were sealed in silica tubes under vacuum (10−4 Pa). The batches were heated at a rate of 1 K min−1 to 1200 K, homogenized at this temperature for a few days, and then quenched in cold water. The 2NaCl–Ga2S3 samples for HE‐XRD measurements after primary synthesis were placed into thin‐walled silica tubes (ID 2 mm, OD 3 mm), evacuated and sealed under vacuum.

Diffraction Measurements over a Wide Temperature Range

Time‐of‐flight ND experiments have been carried out at the ISIS spallation neutron source (Rutherford‐Appleton Laboratory, UK) using the GEM diffractometer. HE‐XRD experiments of crystalline and liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 over a wide temperature range from 300 to 1223 K were conducted at the BL04B2 beamline of the Spring‐8 facility (Hyogo prefecture, Japan). Two separate experiments were performed using X‐ray energies of 61.350 and 61.199 keV, providing data at Q values up to 25 Å−1 in a 1D scanning mode with a detector array consisting of a Ge diode and three CdTe detectors. In addition to the diffraction experiments, separate transmission measurements of molten 2NaCl–Ga2S3 were carried out using an ionization chamber. The measured X‐ray absorption as a function of temperature was used to calculate the T‐dependent density of liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3. Additional HE‐XRD measurements of slowly cooled (with a furnace) and rapidly quenched 2NaCl–Ga2S3 (in icy water from 1223 K) were conducted at the 6‐ID‐D beamline of the Advanced Photon Source (Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA). The photon energy used was 100.398 keV, with a corresponding wavelength of 0.123493 Å. Further experimental details and data analysis can be found in the Supporting Information.

XRD and LeBail Refinement

XRD pattern of crystalline Ga2S3 samples were recorded at room temperature using a Bruker D8 A25 diffractometer equipped with a copper anode (λ = 1.5418 Å), operating at 40 kV and 40 mA, in Bragg–Brentano reflection geometry. A 1D position‐sensitive detector, Bruker LynxEye XE‐T, covering 3° in 192 channels was used. Phase identification was conducted with Bruker EVA 6.1 software coupled to PDF2023 database.[ 67 ] Full powder pattern matching was done by LeBail extraction, using the JANA2020 software.

Raman Spectroscopy Measurements

A LabRam HR microRaman spectrometer (Jobin Yvon Horiba Group) was used for the measurements at room temperature. Raman scattering was excited by a 785 nm solid‐state laser and recorded in the 50–850 cm−1 spectral range. The laser power was 4 mW. Two to three spectra were registered for each sample at different positions to verify the sample homogeneity and the absence of photoinduced phenomena. Raman spectra over the temperature range 294 ≤ T ≤ 1113 K were measured using a Senterra Raman spectrometer (Bruker) equipped with a microscope and a Linkam TS1000 hot stage. The spectra were excited by a 785 nm laser diode with a power of 10 mW and recorded in the 75–1500 cm−1 spectral range (reliable data above 100 cm−1). The 2NaCl–Ga2S3 sample was placed in a silica tube (2 mm ID/3 mm OD, length 25 mm) and sealed under vacuum.

Sodium Tracer Diffusion Measurements

The 22Na tracer (the life‐time t1/2 = 2.6027 years, iThemba LABS, Faure, South Africa, radionuclide purity 99.9%) was used for tracer diffusion experiments in a thin‐layer geometry. The diffusion anneals in a furnace over the temperature range from 408 to 525 K were from 2 to 39 days and terminated by quenching the samples in air. A high‐purity Ge detector GX1018 and LYNX gamma spectrometer (Canberra Ind., USA) was used to measure the initial and residual activity of the sample before and after sectioning. The spectrometer calibration in the energy range from 20 to 1600 keV was carried out using 109Cd, 152Eu, and 241Am sources with different activities. The gamma activity of the samples was determined using two characteristic 22Na photopeaks at 511 and 1275 keV. Further experimental details are provided in the Supporting Information.

First‐Principles Simulations

The DFT calculations of vibrational spectra were carried out using Gaussian 16 software. The structural optimization and harmonic vibrational frequency calculations were performed for size‐limited clusters: CS–Ga2S7H6, ES–Ga2S6H4, Ga4S8H4, CS–Ga2Cl2S5Na2H2, ES–Ga2Cl2S4Na2, Na4Cl4, etc. The Becke three‐parameter hybrid exchange functional and the Lee–Yang–Parr correlation functional (B3LYP)[ 68 , 69 ] were applied for these simulations. The small‐core relativistic pseudopotential basis set (cc‐pVTZ‐PP)[ 70 ] and the effective core potentials[ 71 ] were used for cluster geometry optimization and Raman intensity calculations. Most of the structures were optimized using the tight convergence option ensuring adequate convergence and reliability of computed wavenumbers. An extra quadratically convergent self‐consistent field procedure[ 72 ] was employed for difficult convergence cases.

Modeling of the diffraction data was carried out using Born–Oppenheimer molecular dynamics implemented within the CP2K package. The GGA[ 32 ] and the PBE0 hybrid exchange–correlation functional[ 33 , 34 ] combining the exact Hartree–Fock and DFT approaches were used, providing better agreement with experiment. The Grimme dispersion corrections D3BJ[ 73 ] were also employed. The initial atomic configurations for liquid 2NaCl–Ga2S3 were created and optimized using the RMC_POT++ code[ 74 ] against the experimental X‐ray and neutron data. The size of the cubic simulation box, containing 495 atoms (110 Na, 110 Cl, 110 Ga, and 165 S), was chosen to match the experimental density. Further optimization was carried out using DFT, applying the molecularly optimized correlation consistent polarized triple‐zeta valence basis set along with the norm‐conserving relativistic Goedecker–Teter–Hutter‐type pseudopotentials.[ 75 ] FPMD simulations were performed using a canonical NVT ensemble with a Nosé–Hoover thermostat. The pyMolDyn code[ 55 ] applying the Dirichlet–Voronoi tessellation was used for the calculation of microscopic voids and cavities. Electron density distribution was collected at the same level of theory and stored in Gaussian CUBE file format. The Bader atomic charges were calculated using the algorithm for doing analysis on a charge density grid.[ 57 ] The derived charges were averaged over 1 ps for all atoms of the simulation box. Further simulation details can be found in the Supporting Information.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

Maria Bokova: synthesis; Raman spectroscopy; DFT simulations. Mohammad Kassem: synthesis; Raman spectroscopy. Takeshi Usuki: HE‐XRD over a wide T‐range and data analysis. Andrey Tverjanovich: Raman spectroscopy measurements over a wide T‐range. Anton Sokolov: FPMD simulations, network statistics and Bader analysis. Daniele Fontanari: FPMD simulations, network statistics and Bader analysis. Alex C. Hannon: ND and data analysis. Chris J. Benmore: HE‐XRD and PDF analysis. Igor Alekseev: tracer diffusion measurements and data analysis. Shinji Kohara: HE‐XRD over a wide T‐range and data analysis. Pascal Roussel: XRD and LeBail refinement. Maxim Khomenko: FPMD simulations, network statistics and Bader analysis. Koji Ohara: HE‐XRD over a wide T‐range and data analysis. Yohei Onodera: HE‐XRD over a wide T‐range and data analysis. Arnaud Cuisset: DFT simulations. Eugene Bychkov: Conceptualization; ND and data analysis; paper writing with the contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Supporting information

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

The work at Littoral was supported by the Région Hauts de France and the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche (CPER ECRIN), as well as by the European Fund for Regional Economic Development. The experiments at SPring‐8 were approved by the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (proposal nos. 2017A1067, 2017B1771, and 2021B1197) and supported by the Centre for Advanced Science and Technology (Japan). Work at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, was supported in part by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy, under contract no. DEAC02‐06CH11357. Work at the ISIS spallation neutron source (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory) was performed within Proposal RB1620394 supported by the UK. Science and Technology Facilities Council. This work was granted access to the HPC resources of IDRIS (France) under the allocation 2023‐A0150910639 made by Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif (GENCI) and to use the CALCULCO computing platform, supported by Service COmmun du Système d’Information de l’Université du Littoral Co^te d’Opale (SCoSI/ULCO). The FPMD simulations were also carried out using the HPC computing resources at Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Goodenough J. B., Park K.‐S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kato Y., Hori S., Saito T., Suzuki K., Hirayama M., Mitsui A., Yonemura M., Iba H., Kanno R., Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16030. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Janek J., Zeier W. G., Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16141. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Asano T., Sakai A., Ouchi S., Sakaida M., Miyazaki A., Hasegawa S., Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kwak H., Wang S., Park J., Liu Y., Kim K. T., Choi Y., Mo Y., Jung Y. S., ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 1776. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schlem R., Banik A., Eckardt M., Zobel M., Zeier W. G., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 10164. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sebti E., Qi J., Richardson P. M., Ridley P., Wu E. A., Banerjee S., Giovine R., Cronk A., Ham S.-Y., Meng Y. S., Ong S. P., Clément R. J., J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 21565. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Huang Z., Yoshida S., Akamatsu H., Hayashi K., Ohno S., ACS Materials Lett. 2024, 6, 1732. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ridley P., Nguyen L. H. B., Sebti E., Han B., Duong G., Chen Y.-T., Sayahpour B., Cronk A., Deysher C., Ham S.-Y., Oh J. A. S., Wu E. A., Tan D. H. S., Doux J.-M., Clément R., Jang J., Meng Y. S., Matter 2024, 7, 485. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fu J., Wang S., Wu D., Luo J., Wang C., Liang J., Lin X., Hu Y., Zhang S., Zhao F., Li W., Li M., Duan H., Zhao Y., Gu M., Sham T.-K., Mo Y., Sun X., Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2308012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Paraskiva A., Bokova M., Bychkov E., Solid State Ionics 2017, 299, 2. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hector J. R., Wang J., Brady D., Kluth M., Hewak D. W., Brocklesby W. S., Payne D. N., J. Non‐Cryst. Solids 1998, 239, 176. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tver'yanovich Yu. S., Tverjanovich A., in Semiconducting Chalcogenide Glass III. Applications of Chalcogenide Glasses (Eds: Fairman R., Ushkov B.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 169–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Heo J., in Chalcogenide Glasses: Preparation, Properties and Applications (Eds: Adam J.-L., Zhang X.), Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, 2014, pp. 347–380. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tverjanovich A., Tveryanovich Yu. S., Loheider S., J. Non‐Cryst. Solids 1996, 208, 49. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Song J. H., Choi Y. G., Heo J., J. Non‐Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 423. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hindle F., Miloshova M., Bychkov E., Benmore C. J., Hannon A. C., J. Non‐Cryst. Solids 2008, 354, 134. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nedoshovenko E. G., Turkina E. Y., Tveryanovich Yu. S., Borisova Z. U., Vest. Leningrad. Univ. Ser. 4 1986, 52. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Walker D., Verma P. K., Cranswick L. M. D., Jones R. L., Clark S. M., Buhre S., Am. Min. 2004, 89, 204. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hahn H., Klingler W., Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1949, 256, 135–. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Jones C. Y., Bryan J. C., Kirschbaum K., Edwards J. G., Z. Kristallogr. NCS 2001, 216, 327. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kokh K. A., Huang Z.-M., Huang J.-G., Gao Y.-Q., Uralbekov B., Panomareva J., Lapin I. N., Svetlichnyi V. A., Lanskii G. V., Andreev Y. M., Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 84, 462. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhang M.-J., Jiang X.-M., Zhou L.-J., Guo G.-C., J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 4754. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kuhn A., Chevy A., Acta Cryst. B 1976, 32, 983. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tverjanovich A., Khomenko M., Bereznev S., Fontanari D., Sokolov A., Usuki T., Ohara K., Le Coq D., Masselin P., Bychkov E., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 25560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Troyanov S. I., Krahl T., Kemnitz E., Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2004, 219, 88. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Usuki T., Khomenko M., Sokolov A., Bokova M., Ohara K., Kassem M., Tverjanovich A., Bychkov E., Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 7640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zeidler A., Salmon P. S., Usuki T. U., Kohara S., Fisher H. E., Wilson M., J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 094504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bonneau P. R., Jarvis R. F. Jr., Kaner R. B., Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2127. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kassem M., Bounazef T., Fontanari D., Sokolov A., Bokova M., Hannon A. C., Bychkov E., Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 16410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kassem M., Bounazef T., Sokolov A., Bokova M., Fontanari D., Hannon A. C., Alekseev I., Bychkov E., Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 12870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Perdew J. P., Ernzerhof M., Burke K., J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9982. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Adamo C., Barone V., J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tverjanovich A., Khomenko M., Benmore C. J., Bokova M., Sokolov A., Fontanari D., Kassem M., Usuki T., Bychkov E., Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Bokova M., Tverjanovich A., Benmore C. J., Fontanari D., Sokolov A., Khomenko M., Kassem M., Ozheredov I., Bychkov E., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 37363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tverjanovich A., Khomenko M., Benmore C. J., Bereznev S., Sokolov A., Fontanari D., Kiselev A., Lotin A., Bychkov E., J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 17019. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kassem M., Benmore C. J., Tverjanovich A., Usuki T., Khomenko M., Fontanari D., Sokolov A., Ohara K., Bokova M., Kohara S., Bychkov E., J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 4654. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Borisova Z. U., Bychkov E. A., Tveryanovich Y. S., in Interaction of Metals with Chalcogenide Glasses, Leningrad University Press, Leningrad, 1991, pp. 88−102. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gallego‐Parra S., Vilaplana R., Gomis O., Lora da Silva E., Otero‐de‐la‐Roza A., Rodríguez‐Hernández P., Muñoz A., González J., Sans J. A., Cuenca‐Gotor V. P., Ibáñez J., Popescu C., Manjón F. J., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 6841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Gallego‐Parra S., Vilaplana R., Gomis O., Rodríguez‐Hernández P., Muñoz A., González J. A., Sans J. A., Popescu C., Manjón F. J., Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 6068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Montaner A., Galtier M., Benoit C., Bill H., Phys. Stat. Solidi A 1979, 52, 597. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bührer W., Bill H., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1980, 13, 5495. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Huang R., Chavez I., Taute K. M., Lukić B., Jeney S., Raizen M. G., Florin E.-L., Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 576. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Janz G. J., Tomkins R. P. T., Allen C. B., Downey J. R. Jr., Garner G. L., Krebs U., Singer S. K., J. Phys. Chem. Reference Data 1975, 4, 871. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Murch G. E., Solid State Ionics 1982, 7, 177. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Liu J., Wang S., Kawazoe Y., Sun Q., ACS Mater. Lett. 2023, 5, 1009. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mapother D., Crooks H. N., Maurer R., J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 1231. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Nelson V. C., Friauf R. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1970, 31, 825. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Downing H. L. Jr., Friauf R. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1970, 31, 845. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Bénière F., Bénière M., Chemla M., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1970, 31, 1205. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Rothman S. J., Peterson N. L., Laskar A. L., Robinson L. C., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1972, 33, 1061. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Hayashi A., Masuzawa N., Yubuchi S., Tsuji F., Hotehama C., Sakuda A., Tatsumisago M., Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Alekseev I., Fontanari D., Sokolov A., Bokova M., Kassem M., Bychkov E., in World Scientific Reference of Amorphous Materials (Ed.: Taylor P. C.), World Scientific, Singapore, 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 203−249. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Heimbach I., Rhiem F., Beule F., Knodt D., Heinen J., Jones R. O., J. Comput. Chem. 2017, 38, 389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bader R. F. W., in Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Wang S., Bai Q., Nolan A. M., Liu Y., Gong S., Sun Q., Mo Y., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Adelstein N., Wood B. C., Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 7218. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Henkelman G., Arnaldsson A., Jónsson H., Comput. Mater. Sci. 2006, 36, 354. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Phillips J. C., J. Non‐Cryst. Solids 1979, 34, 153. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Thorpe M. F., Duxbury P. M., Eds., Rigidity Theory and Applications, Kluwer, New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Ellenbroek W. G., Hagh V. F., Kumar A., Thorpe M. F., van Hecke M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 135501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Maxwell J. C., Philos. Mag. 1864, 27, 294. [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Calladine C. R., Int. J. Solids Struct. 1978, 14, 161. [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Damavandi O. K., Hagh V. F., Santangelo C. D., Manning M. L., Phys. Rev. E 2022, 105, 025003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Rock J. W., Mehta P., Phys. Rev. E 2024, 110, 025002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Gates‐Rector S., Blanton T., Powder Diffr. 2019, 34, 352. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Becke A. D., J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lee C., Yang W., Parr R. G., Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Feller D., J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 1571. [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Peterson K. A., Figgen D., Goll E., Stoll H., Dolg M., J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 11113. [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Bacskay G. B., Chem. Phys. 1981, 61, 385. [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Grimme S., Ehrlich S., Goerigk L., J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Gereben O., Pusztai L., J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 2285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Hartwigsen C., Goedecker S., Hutter J., Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 3641. [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Bychkov E., Benmore C. J., Price D. L., Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 172107. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Bytchkov A., Cuello G. J., Kohara S., Benmore C. J., Price D. L., Bychkov E., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 8487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Small Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES