Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2025 Mar 13;75(3):006720. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006720

Scheffersomyces tanahashii sp. nov., isolated from the cocoon wall of the stag beetle Prosopocoilus astacoides blanchardi

Matan Shelomi 1,*
PMCID: PMC11936340  PMID: 40085484

Abstract

A previous investigation of symbiotic yeasts associated with the stag beetle Prosopocoilus astacoides blanchardi isolated strains of the genus Scheffersomyces from the cocoon walls, larval midgut, larval hindgut and larval tunnels. Phylogenetic analysis of the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene sequences revealed identical sequences, indicating that they belonged to the same species, but suggested that the species was new. In this study, sequence analysis and physiological characterization identified a representative strain of these beetle-associated yeasts as a novel species in the genus Scheffersomyces. The sequence similarities of the concatenated LSU domains and internal transcribed spacer regions indicated that strain BCRC 23563T forms a well-supported and distinct species in the xylose-fermenting Scheffersomyces subclade, with the sequences for each gene differing in nt substitutions from those of previously described related species by at least 1.06% and 2.7% respectively. The physiological characteristics of the novel species were also distinct from those of the closely related described species, though it could still process xylose as is expected of stag beetle-associated Scheffersomyces symbionts. Based on the data, a novel yeast species, Scheffersomyces tanahashii sp. nov., is proposed to accommodate this strain. The holotype is BCRC 23563T (ex-type strains NBRC 116731 and NCYC 4470). The MycoBank accession number is 857608.

Keywords: Debaryomycetaceae, Lucanidae, one new taxon, Saccharomyceta, yeast, Taiwan

Data Summary

Sequence data generated by this research is available at GenBank, accession numbers PQ349791–PQ349795 and PQ349796–PQ349800. The authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.

Introduction

The genus Scheffersomyces was proposed by Kurtzman and Suzuki [1] along with Babjeviella, Meyerozyma, Millerozyma and Priceomyces as a new clade in a new family, Debaryomycetaceae, formed from the genera Debaryomyces, Lodderomyces, Spathaspora, Yamadazyma and selected species of Pichia and Candida solely on the basis of concatenated D1/D2 large and small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Species in this family all form coenzyme Q-9. Scheffersomyces species generally produce one to two hat-shaped ascospores released soon after formation. They typically have spherical to elongate budded cells and form pseudohyphae but not true hyphae [1,2]. The genus ferments glucose and some other sugars, in particular d-xylose: Scheffersomyces holds the majority of the d-xylose-fermenting yeasts of interest to the biofuel [3] and bioethanol [4,5] industries. A noted exception unable to ferment d-xylose is Scheffersomyces spartinae, first isolated from marshland [6]. Since its description, novel xylose-fermenting species have been added on the basis of phylogenetic analysis [7]. With the exception of Sc. spartinae, which is only known from brackish water [2,6, 8, 9], the other valid species of Scheffersomyces were all discovered either in rotting wood [10,16] or in insects that eat rotting wood such as wood cockroaches (Blattodea: Cryptocercidae) [17], bess beetles (Coleoptera: Passalidae) [18], darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [18], longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) [12] and stag beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) [18,20]. In the original paper describing the genus [1], two varieties of the species Candida shehatae were reclassified into two species, Candida insectosa and Candida lignosa, based with one isolated from a Cerambycidae beetle and another from the wood it infested [21,22], and a later paper would separately classify these and the original species as three separate species: Scheffersomyces shehatae, Scheffersomyces insectosa and Scheffersomyces lignosus [7]. The placement of Sc. spartinae in the genus in the Kurtzman and Suzuki paper, where it was the weakly supported basal species of the genus [1], remains controversial [8]. There are currently 22 valid species of Scheffersomyces, plus two with unclear status due to nomenclatural issues arising from non-adherence to the Melbourne Code [12], Scheffersomyces gosingicus isolated from forest soil [23] and Scheffersomyces lignicola isolated from insect frass [24].

Stag beetles have wood-feeding larvae highly dependent on fungi to digest their food [25]. These fungi are typically xylose-fermenting yeasts [26], most commonly from the genus Scheffersomyces [27,28], some of which remain undescribed [27]. These symbiotic yeasts can be vertically transmitted by females that store them in their mycangia and deposit them when ovipositing [29]. As the larvae develop, they form a cocoon wall from their faeces incorporating the symbiotic yeasts, and when females emerge, they evert their mycangium and rub it on the cocoon wall to acquire the yeasts and continue the transmission cycle [19,26, 30]. In a 2023 paper published in the Coleopterists' Bulletin, several yeasts were isolated from the mycangia, larval gut and larval tunnels of wild and lab-reared Prosopocoilus astacoides blanchardi (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) from Taiwan [31]. The isolated yeasts varied greatly among individuals, suggesting that the associations between yeast symbionts and these beetle hosts do not follow a one-to-one relationship with essential vertical transmission as had been documented for other stag beetle species [28]. Among the microbes cultured were strains of Scheffersomyces and Spathaspora. The Scheffersomyces isolates, regardless of source, did not show significant divergence amongst themselves based on 28S rRNA sequencing and were paraphyletic to a monophyletic clade containing the type species of the genus, Scheffersomyces stipitis [1]; Scheffersomyces illinoinensis, isolated from rotting hardwood [7]; Scheffersomyces segobiensis, isolated from soil [1,32]; Scheffersomyces stambukii, isolated from rotting wood [11]; and Scheffersomyces titanus, isolated from another stag beetle, Serrognathus titanus [20]. All the isolated Scheffersomyces yeasts – over 20 isolates from larval midguts (strains L10MG, L11MG, L14MG, L15MG, L16MG and L19MG), larval hindguts (L2HG-2, L11HG, L20HG-1, L20HG-2 and L21HG), larval tunnel walls (LT3, LT8, LT9, LT10, LT11, LT14, LT16 and LT17), cocoon walls (CW2, CW8, CW9, CW12, CW15 and CW20) and one adult mycangium (A14MYC) – were identified on the basis of D1/D2 sequence similarity and phylogenetic analysis as strains of the same species, and likely one that was novel to science [31]. Further efforts to differentiate the species and confirm these identities have only now been completed. Phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and physiological characterization indicates clearly that the Scheffersomyces species isolated from the beetles, exemplified by strain CW2, is a novel species, hereby proposed as a novel species, Scheffersomyces tanahashii sp. nov.

Methods

Yeast isolation and culture

Strains were isolated and purified from P. astacoides blanchardi and their habitats reared at the Department of Entomology at National Taiwan University (25.019537 N 121.543440 E) from larvae collected at Tai'an Township, Taiwan, as described in the original paper [31]. Strain CW2, a representative isolate among over 20 of the putative new Scheffersomyces species, was isolated from wood pieces taken from the cocoon wall of a P. astacoides blanchardi adult after it had eclosed, with sampling from the end closest to the abdomen tip (the area where the adult female would rub her everted mycangium on to re-acquire symbiotic yeasts). The wood sample was placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube with 160 µl of sterilized PBS (see the original paper for the recipe), homogenized, diluted and loaded onto 90 mm Petri dishes of potato dextrose agar (HiMedia®, India) and 100 mg ml-1 chloramphenicol (Bioman Scientific Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan) incubated aerobically at 27 °C in the dark for 2–3 days. Colonies were purified on potato dextrose agar. All isolated yeast strains were preserved in 50% glycerol stocks and stored at −80 °C, and a few isolated and purified yeasts were sent to the Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC) of the Food Industry Research and Development Institute in Hsinchu, Taiwan, for permanent strain preservation in a metabolically inactive state and identification testing. Unfortunately, due to a catastrophic failure of the -80 °C freezer in which the glycerol stocks were stored, no other representatives of the putative new Scheffersomyces species could be recovered other than CW2, now BCRC 23563T. Whilst single isolate descriptions are not favoured, they are allowed [33,34]. Subsequent analyses were performed on ex-type cultures revived from BCRC 23563T, and isolates thereof were also publicly deposited in the NITE Biological Resource Center (NBRC) in Chiba, Japan, and the National Collection of Yeast Cultures (NCYC) in the UK.

Morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics

To delineate species as per the phenotypic species concept [35], strain BCRC 23563T was compared along with other strains isolated from other Prosopocoilus species in the BCRC collection and compared to known data for related Scheffersomyces species. To identify strains on the basis of morphological characteristics, strains were cultured in yeast malt (YM) broth (yeast extract, 3.0 g; malt extract, 3.0 g; peptone, 5.0 g; dextrose, 10.0 g; distilled water, 1.0 l), then YM agar (YM broth recipe plus 20.0 g agar) at 25 °C for 3 days. To test for pseudohyphae, strains were cultured on Dalmau plates at 26 °C for 7 days. To test for sporulation, in addition to YM and Dalmau, strains were cultured on diluted V8 agar (1:19) at 20 °C for up to 14 days. Biochemical profile analysis with a VITEK 2 COMPACT (bioMérieux, France) was done according to the manufacturer’s instruction using the VITEK 2 YST ID card and VITEK 2 COMPACT identification software v9.02. The biochemical tests examined carbon source utilization, nitrogen source utilization and enzyme activities involving the following compounds: 2-keto-d-gluconate, acetate, alpha-glucosidase, amygdalin, arbutin, arginine, beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, d-cellobiose, d-galactose, d-galacturonate, d-gluconate, d-glucose, d-maltose, d-mannose, d-melezitose, d-melibiose, d-raffinose, d-sorbitol, d-trehalose, d-turanose, d-xylose, dl-lactate, erythritol, aesculin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, glucuronate, glycerol, l-arabinose, l-glutamate, l-lysine arylamidase, l-malate, l-proline, l-rhamnose, l-sorbose, lactose, leucine arylamidase, methyl-A-d-glucopyranoside, N-acetyl-glucosamine, nitrate, PNP-N-acetyl-BD-galactosaminidase, R-rhamnose, saccharose/sucrose, sodium citrate, tyrosine arylamidase, urease and xylitol. The results of those tests are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Selected phenotypic test results for characteristics distinguishing different Scheffersomyces strains. CW2: Sc. tanahashii sp. nov. BCRC 23563T. (a) Scheffersomyces cryptocercus NRRL Y-48824T [17]. (b) Scheffersomyces henanensis CICC 1974T [10]. (c) Sc. illinoinensis NRRL Y-48827T [7]. (d) Sc. lignosus CBS 4705T [22]. (e) Sc. segobiensis CBS 6857T [44]. (f) Sc. shehatae CBS 5813T [22]. (g) Sc. stipitis BCRC 21775T. (h) Sc. stipitis CBS 5773T [44]. +: positive; −: negative; v: variable; w: weakly positive; d: delayed positive; [blank]: not tested.

CW2 A B C D E F G H
Pseudohyphae + + + + + w + + +
Ascospores − − + − − + − + +
Nitrate reduction − − − + − − − − −
Assimilation test
Citrate (sodium) + − + + + + + + +
d-Cellobiose + + + + + + + +
d-Galactose − + + + + + + + +
d-Glucose + + + + + + + + +
d-Maltose + + + + + + + + +
d-Melezitose − + d + + − + +
d-Melibiose − + − + − − − − −
d-Raffinose − − − − v − v − −
d-Trehalose + + + + + + + + +
d-Xylose + + + + + + + + +
dl-Lactate − − − + + − − +
Erythritol − − d + v − v +
Glucuronate v − − v −
Glycerol − − + + + + + +
l-Arabinose − w − + v − v − v
l-Rhamnose + − + + − − − + +
l-Sorbose − + − − + + v − v
Lactose − − − − v − v − v
N-Acetyl-glucosamine − + − + + + + + +
Saccharose/sucrose + + + + v + + v +
Xylitol − − v v −

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analyses were performed to determine genetic relationships within the yeast species as per the phylogenetic species concept [35], which was the concept applied to justify creating the genus Scheffersomyces in the first place [1] and remains the most important species concept used when adding new species to the genus [7,10, 12, 20]. For phylogenetic analysis, Sanger sequencing of the D1/D2 region of the LSU rRDNA and the complete ITS region was done on clones isolated on the YM agar at 26 °C for 2–3 days. Genomic DNA was extracted using a FavorPrep™ Blood/Cultured Cell Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Taiwan) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used for LSU sequencing were the standard primers NL1/F63 (5′-GCA TAT CAA TAA GCG GAG GAA AAG-3′) and NL3/LR3 (5′-GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G-3′) [36], and for ITS, the standard primers ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) were used [36,37]. The PCR polymerase was Biomate™ Taq DNA polymerase (Taiwan). The nt sequence of each PCR product was determined by Sanger sequencing performed at Tri-I Biotech Inc. (Taiwan) on an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer. The resulting LSU and ITS barcode sequences for BCRC 23563T have been uploaded to GenBank with accession numbers PQ349791 and PQ349796, respectively. Up to 100 complete LSU (D1/D2) and ITS sequences from type strains of Scheffersomyces and related genera identified from a blast search of the GenBank database were downloaded [38]. Sequences were aligned with Clustal Omega multiple sequence alignment with an online web server [39]. Using mega x [40], the ends and gappy regions were trimmed. Next, the aligned LSU and ITS sequences were concatenated. A maximum-likelihood tree was made from the alignment using the IQTREE [41,42] v2.3.6 web server [http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/] with 1000 bootstrap alignments to assess the confidence levels of the clades, with Saccharomyces cerevisiae used as an outgroup. Trees were visualized with FigTree v1.4.4 [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/].

Results and discussion

BCRC 23563T was isolated from P. astacoides blanchardi [31] along with other Scheffersomyces and related yeasts from the same beetle and the closely related Prosopocoilus motschulskii. Using only LSU and ITS sequencing corroborated by phenotype as described above, several of these strains could be conclusively identified to species. The mycangium of wild-caught female P. motschulskii isolated a strain of Sc. segobiensis (BCRC 23557 and NBRC 116728) and a strain of Sc. stipitis (BCRC 23558 and NBRC 116729) identified with 100% sequence similarity for both 26S and ITS genes. The mycangium of a lab-reared, newly eclosed female P. astacoides blanchardi isolated a strain of Sc. stipitis (BCRC 23559 and NBRC 116730) also with 100% sequence similarities. From a P. astacoides blanchardi larval midgut, a strain was isolated and identified as Spathaspora elongata (BCRC 23564, NBRC 116732 and NCYC 4471) partly on the basis of the LSU sequence having 99.65% sequence similarity to that of S. elongata NYNU 18115T, and the ITS sequences having 100% sequence similarity. I give these examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of the above methods and the chosen phylogenetic species concept to identify Prosopocoilus-associated yeasts to species, if they are of a previously described species, and, by the same logic, justify the observation that BCRC 23563T is novel. These same methods have also been sufficient to differentiate and describe species in Debaryomycetaceae as recently as the past year [43].

The blastn search of the type specimens in the GenBank rRNA/ITS databases found differences in the BCRC 23563T barcode sequences compared to those of published types. The LSU rRNA sequence showed a 99.12% sequence similarity to that of Sc. shehatae NRRL Y-12858T (five nt substitutions and one gap) and 99.12% sequence similarity to that of Sc. lignosus ATCC 58779T (five nt substitutions and two gaps). If performing a blastn search of the type specimens in the GenBank standard core nt database, strain Sc. cryptocercus R6P1T also appears with a 99.12% sequence similarity (five nt substitutions and no gap). Whilst there are some exceptions, according to the genetic species concept, for this region of the LSU, ‘conspecifics may differ by up to three nucleotide substitutions and species differ with six or more substitutions’ [35,36, 44], which puts the LSU sequence for BCRC 23563T just barely in the boundary area with room for interpretation. Prior authors [22] have stated that Sc. shehatae cannot be differentiated from Sc. insectosa or Scheffersomyces lignosa on the basis of LSU and that ITS sequencing at a minimum must be added to differentiate these species. The ITS sequence of BCRC 23563T showed 97.30% sequence similarity to those of both Sc. illinoinensis NRRL Y-48827T (12 nt substitutions and 4 gaps) and Sc. stipitis ATCC 58376T (13 nt substitutions and 4 gaps). A commonly used percent similarity cutoff for ITS sequencing for fungal species identification is ~98.5% [45,47]. Some authors have used an ITS sequence similarity cutoff of 98.41% between different yeast species and 96.31% for different yeast genera and an LSU sequence similarity cutoff of 99.51% and 97.11% for different yeast species and genera, respectively [48]. Given that the two different barcodes did not point to the same species as closest relatives and that the ITS sequence similarity is beyond any used cutoff for a new species, I am inclined to interpret the >3 nt substitutions in the LSU sequence as suggesting BCRC 23563T is not any other known Scheffersomyces species as per the genetic species concept [35].

Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated LSU and ITS sequences of the Scheffersomyces and related yeasts, with Saccharomyces as an outgroup, supported the novel species designation for BCRC 23563T. The use of concatenated gene trees has precedence in recent Scheffersomyces species descriptions [11,12] and is reported to be more accurate than consensus trees of separate gene phylogenies [49,50]. The maximum-likelihood tree of the concatenated genes (Fig. 1) placed BCRC 23563T as a distinctly separate taxon to a clade containing Scheffersomyces stitipis, Sc. illinoinensis, Sc. segobiensis and Scheffersomyces titani. This can be compared to the other, aforementioned Scheffersomyces strains isolated from Prosopocoilus spp. with 100% sequence similarities to known species, which formed close sister groups with their conspecifics. The phylogenetic data places the new species BCRC 23563T within what Urbina and Blackwell describe as the xylose-fermenting subclade of Scheffersomyces [7], producing a phenotype prediction that ended up confirmed.

Fig. 1. The maximum-likelihood tree for the concatenated LSU and ITS sequences made with IQTREE v1.6.12 [41,42] with ultrafast bootstrapping [52] and the best-fit model GTR+F+I+G4 as chosen by ModelFinder [53]. The following species and strains are written with the GenBank accession numbers for the LSU and ITS sequences, respectively. Node circles correspond to bootstrap values, with larger circles indicating higher support from 0% to 100%. Figure prepared with FigTree v1.4.4.

Fig. 1.

Regarding phenotype, strain BCRC 23563T (ex-type NBRC 116731 and NCYC 4470) has spherical to ovoid cells with a size of 2–4.5×2–7 µm after cultivating in YM broth for 3 days (Fig. 2a). They proliferate asexually by multipolar budding and formed single or paired cells. In broth, it is non-flocculent with no ring or pellicle. On solid YM agar media, the colonies are off-white with a smooth, dull surface. No ascospores are evident after growth on any media. The pseudohyphae test is positive after 1 day on the Dalmau plate (Fig. 2b), but no true hyphae are formed. The carbon assimilation tests summarized in Table 1 show some distinctive attributes separating BCRC 23563T from its closest phylogenetic relatives. These physiological and biochemical test results show the overall closest similarity to the published characteristics of Sc. shehatae CBS 5813T [22,44] and Sc. henanensis CICC 1974T [10]. However, BCRC 23563T differs from the former in its ability to degrade l-rhamnose [22] and from the latter in its lack of ascospores after growth on any of the media (Table 1). It differs from all listed Scheffersomyces species in an inability to assimilate d-galactose. BCRC 23563T could thus be differentiated from related species [35]. When combined with the genetic and phylogenetic data, the results surpass the minimally accepted evidence for a new species [33]. In accordance with the Shenzhen Code [51], it is reasonable to place this species in the genus Scheffersomyces.

Fig. 2. Micrographs of strain 23563T. All scale bars are 10 µm. (a) Yeasts after growth in YM broth. (c) Positive pseudohyphae test after culturing on Dalmau plates at 26 °C. Image (a) was made with a phase contrast microscope (Eclipse E600, Nikon) and Canon Digital EOS Rebel T5i Camera DS126431, using EOS Utility 2 v2.14.20a to take the images and AxioVision LE v4.8.2.0 to generate the scale bar. Image (b) used a differential interference contrast microscope (MICROPHOT-FXA, Nikon) with a Nikon FDX-35 Camera and the MShot Digital Imaging Analysis System v1.1.6 to take the pictures and add a scale bar.

Fig. 2.

In this study, I identify a strain hypothesized to be a novel species in a previous paper describing its isolation from the cocoon wall of a P. astacoides blanchardi stag beetle and preliminary identification work with LSU sequence analysis [31]. That study identified the strain to the genus Scheffersomyces, for which LSU sequences alone are not sufficient to differentiate between species [7]. Here, the strain is identified as a new species based on phenotypic differences and, in particular, genetic differences in the LSU and ITS gene sequences passing accepted thresholds separating new species [48]. As many species of Scheffersomyces have been isolated from wood-feeding insects or habitats associated with them, the finding of one in P. astacoides blanchardi was not surprising. Based on the original published data as well as previous findings in beetle-associated Scheffersomyces [28], BCRC 23563T represents a species, which the name Scheffersomyces tanahashii sp. nov. is proposed to accommodate, that can be found in the P. astacoides blanchardi larval midgut, hindgut, tunnel and cocoon wall, even if the holotype was isolated from the latter. Whilst Scheffersomyces species dominated in that study, some of the sampled beetle larvae guts were predominantly colonized by Spathaspora instead, and 15 other genera of fungi were also reported [31]. That multiple species of yeast can be associated with the same species of stag beetle in the same location in Taiwan, suggesting that Lucanidae species do not necessarily form specific symbiotic relationships with a single species or genus of yeast [28]. Instead, a number of yeasts associated with rotting wood, such as several different Scheffersomyces species, could potentially colonize the gut of larvae and assist with digestion and/or colonize the mycangium of recently emerged adults and potentially be passed vertically to the next generation [26,30]. It remains unclear what difference in benefits, if any, Sc. tanahashii would provide relative to other species of Scheffersomyces, or a species of another genus for that matter. What the discovery of Sc. tanahashii does suggest is that more species of wood- and/or insect-associated Debaryomycetaceae remain to be described.

Description of Scheffersomyces tanahashii Shelomi sp. nov.

Scheffersomyces tanahashii (ta.na.ha’shi.i N.L. gen. n. tanahashii, referring to Masahiko Tanahashi, in recognition of his research on stag beetle-associated yeasts).

After 3 days of growth on YM broth at 25 °C, cells are spherical to ovoid (2–4.5×2–7 µm) and occur singly or in pairs (Fig. 2). They proliferate asexually by multipolar budding and form single or paired cells. On YM agar after 3 days at 25 °C, the streak culture is off-white, raised, with a smooth surface and has an entire margin. Pseudohyphae are observed on Dalmau plates after 1 day at 25 °C. True hyphae, ascospores and asci are not evident when the strains are incubated on YM, Dalmau or V8 media. Carbon assimilation is positive for d-cellobiose, d-glucose, d-maltose, d-trehalose, d-xylose, l-rhamnose, sucrose and sodium citrate; negative for d-galactose, d-melezitose, d-melibiose, d-raffinose, dl-lactate, erythritol, glycerol, l-arabinose, l-sorbose, lactose, N-acetyl-glucosamine and xylitol; and variable for glucuronate. Nitrogen assimilation is negative for nitrate.

The holotype is BCRC 23563T, isolated on 23 March 2022 from the cocoon wall of a P. astacoides blanchardi (Coleoptera; Lucanidae) reared at the Department of Entomology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. It is preserved in a metabolically inactive state as a lyophilized preparation in the BCRC in Hsinchu, Taiwan. The ex-type culture is preserved at the NBRC in Tokyo, Japan, as NBRC 116731, and at the NCYC in Norwich, UK, as NCYC 4470. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences of the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and ITS regions determined in this study are PQ349791 and PQ349796, respectively. The MycoBank accession number is 857608.

Acknowledgements

The strains were initially isolated by Jun Wei Fan of National Taiwan University. Contract tests were performed at the Bioresource Collection and Research Center of the Food Industry Research and Development Institute in Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Abbreviations

BCRC

Bioresource Collection and Research Center

NBRC

NITE Biological Resource Center

NCYC

National Collection of Yeast Cultures

YM

yeast malt

Footnotes

Funding: M.S. was funded by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, Grant Number: MOST-109–2311-B-002–016-MY3, and the Taiwan Ministry of Education, Grant Numbers 111L7822, 112L7814, and 113L7801. The funding source did not play a role in the study, preparation of the article, or decision to publish.

Author contributions: M.S.: data curation, formal analysis, phylogenetics analysis, resources and writing.

Accession No: GenBank accession number for the LSU rRNA gene sequence: PQ349791. GenBank accession number for the nearly complete ITS rRNA gene sequence: PQ349796.

References

  • 1.Kurtzman CP, Suzuki M. Phylogenetic analysis of ascomycete yeasts that form coenzyme Q-9 and the proposal of the new genera Babjeviella, Meyerozyma, Millerozyma, Priceomyces, and Scheffersomyces. Mycoscience. 2010;51:2–14. doi: 10.1007/S10267-009-0011-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurtzman CP. In: The Yeasts, 5th Edn. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. London: Elsevier; 2011. Chapter 65 - Scheffersomyces Kurtzman & M. Suzuki (2010) pp. 773–777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kwak S, Jo JH, Yun EJ, Jin Y-S, Seo J-H. Production of biofuels and chemicals from xylose using native and engineered yeast strains. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:271–283. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cadete RM, Melo-Cheab MA, Dussán KJ, Rodrigues RCLB, da Silva SS, et al. Production of bioethanol in sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate by Scheffersomyces parashehatae, Scheffersomyces illinoinensis and Spathaspora arborariae isolated from Brazilian ecosystems. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;123:1203–1213. doi: 10.1111/jam.13559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Farias D, de Andrade RR, Maugeri-Filho F. Kinetic modeling of ethanol production by Scheffersomyces stipitis from xylose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;172:361–379. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0546-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahearn DG, Yarrow D, Meyers SP. Pichia spartinae sp. n. from Louisiana marshland habitats. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1970;36:503–508. doi: 10.1007/BF02069052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Urbina H, Blackwell M. Multilocus phylogenetic study of the Scheffersomyces yeast clade and characterization of the N-terminal region of xylose reductase gene. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Villarreal AR, Campbell DE, Webster SS, Hunter RC. Draft genome sequence of Scheffersomyces spartinae ARV011, a Marine yeast isolate. Microbiol Resour Announc . 2021;10:e0065221. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00652-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gillings MR, Holley MP, Selleck M. Molecular identification of species comprising an unusual biofilm from a groundwater treatment plant. Biofilms. 2006;3:19–24. doi: 10.1017/S1479050507002098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ren Y, Chen L, Niu Q, Hui F. Description of Scheffersomyces henanensis sp. nov., a new D-xylose-fermenting yeast species isolated from rotten wood. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lopes MR, Batista TM, Franco GR, Ribeiro LR, Santos ARO, et al. Scheffersomyces stambukii f.a., sp. nov., a d-xylose-fermenting species isolated from rotting wood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:2306–2312. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jia RR, Lv SL, Chai CY, Hui FL. Three new Scheffersomyces species associated with insects and rotting wood in China. MycoKeys. 2020;71:87–99. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.71.56168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cadete RM, Melo MA, Lopes MR, Pereira GMD, Zilli JE, et al. Candida amazonensis sp. nov., an ascomycetous yeast isolated from rotting wood in the Amazonian forest. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:1438–1440. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.036715-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ramírez C, González A. Five new filamentous, glucose-fermenting Candida isolated from decayed wood in the evergreen rainy Valdivian forest of southern Chile. Mycopathologia. 1984;88:83–92. doi: 10.1007/BF00436436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Santa Maria J. Candida ergatensis nov. spec. An Inst Nac Investig Agrarias. 1971;1:85–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Santos RO, Cadete RM, Badotti F, Mouro A, Wallheim DO, et al. Candida queiroziae sp. nov., a cellobiose-fermenting yeast species isolated from rotting wood in Atlantic rain forest. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2011;99:635–642. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9536-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Urbina H, Frank R, Blackwell M. Scheffersomyces cryptocercus: a new xylose-fermenting yeast associated with the gut of wood roaches and new combinations in the Sugiyamaella yeast clade. Mycologia. 2013;105:650–660. doi: 10.3852/12-094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Suh S-O, Houseknecht JL, Gujjari P, Zhou JJ. Scheffersomyces parashehatae f.a., sp. nov., Scheffersomyces xylosifermentans f.a., sp. nov., Candida broadrunensis sp. nov. and Candida manassasensis sp. nov., novel yeasts associated with wood-ingesting insects, and their ecological and biofuel implications. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:4330–4339. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.053009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tanahashi M, Hawes CJ. The presence of a mycangium in European Sinodendron cylindricum (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) and the associated yeast symbionts. J Insect Sci . 2016;16:76. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iew054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu X-J, Cao W-N, Ren Y-C, Xu L-L, Yi Z-H, et al. Taxonomy and physiological characterisation of Scheffersomyces titanus sp. nov., a new D-xylose-fermenting yeast species from China. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32181. doi: 10.1038/srep32181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buckley HR, Uden N. Candida shehatae sp. n., a yeast associated with wood-destroying insects. Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1967;32:297–301. doi: 10.1007/BF02202068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kurtzman CP. Candida shehatae — genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships with other xylose-fermenting yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1990;57:215–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00400153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chang C-F, Yao C-H, Young S-S, Limtong S, Kaewwichian R, Srisuk N, et al. Candida gosingica sp. nov., an anamorphic ascomycetous yeast closely related to Scheffersomyces spartinae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61(3):690–4. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.020511-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jindamorakot S, Limtong S, Yongmanitchai W, Tuntirungkij M, Potacharoen W, et al. Two new anamorphic yeasts, Candida thailandica sp. nov. and Candida lignicola sp. nov., isolated from insect frass in Thailand. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:1409–1414. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tanahashi M, Matsushita N, Togashi K. Are stag beetles fungivorous? J Insect Physiol. 2009;55:983–988. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tanahashi M, Kubota K, Matsushita N, Togashi K. Discovery of mycangia and the associated xylose-fermenting yeasts in stag beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) Naturwissenschaften. 2010;97:311–317. doi: 10.1007/s00114-009-0643-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Roets F, Oberlander KC. Symbiotic yeasts from the mycangium, larval gut and woody substrate of an African stag beetle Xiphodontus antilope (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113:1123–1134. doi: 10.1007/s10482-020-01418-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tanahashi M, Kim J-K, Watanabe K, Fukatsu T, Kubota K. Specificity and genetic diversity of xylose-fermenting Scheffersomyces yeasts associated with small blue stag beetles of the genus Platycerus in East Asia. Mycologia. 2017;109:630–642. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2017.1382648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tanahashi M, Fremlin M. The mystery of the lesser stag beetle dorcus parallelipipedus (L.) (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) mycangium yeasts. Bull Amateur Entomol Soc. 2013;72:146–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fremlin M, Tanahashi M. Sexually-dimorphic post-eclosion behaviour in the european stag beetle lucanus cervus (L.) (coleoptera: lucanidae) Mitteil Schweiz Entomol Ges. 2015;88:29–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fan J-W, Shelomi M. Symbiotic yeasts of Prosopocoilus astacoides blanchardi (parry, 1873) (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) Coleopt Bull. 2023;77 doi: 10.1649/0010-065X-77.4.527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schulze I, Hansen S, Großhans S, Rudszuck T, Ochsenreither K, et al. Characterization of newly isolated oleaginous yeasts - Cryptococcus podzolicus, Trichosporon porosum and Pichia segobiensis. AMB Express. 2014;4:24. doi: 10.1186/s13568-014-0024-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aime MC, Miller AN, Aoki T, Bensch K, Cai L, et al. How to publish a new fungal species, or name, version 3.0. IMA Fungus. 2021;12:11. doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00063-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yurkov A, Visagie CM, Crous PW, Hashimoto A, Baschien C, et al. Cultures as types and the utility of viable specimens for fungal nomenclature. IMA Fungus. 2024;15:20. doi: 10.1186/s43008-024-00155-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Boekhout T, Aime MC, Begerow D, Gabaldón T, Heitman J, et al. The evolving species concepts used for yeasts: from phenotypes and genomes to speciation networks. Fungal Divers. 2021;109:27–55. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00475-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fell JW, Boekhout T, Fonseca A, Scorzetti G, Statzell-Tallman A. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50 Pt 3:1351–1371. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-3-1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.O’Donnell K. Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers are highly divergent in the phytopathogenic ascomycete Fusarium sambucinum (Gibberella pulicaris) Curr Genet. 1992;22:213–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00351728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W5–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Madeira F, Madhusoodanan N, Lee J, Eusebi A, Niewielska A, et al. The EMBL-EBI Job dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:W521–W525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W232–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hamaguchi A, Umeshita K, Taguchi H, Sasano Y. Spathaspora quercus f.a., sp. nov., a novel yeast isolated from rotting wood and a lichen sample in Kyushu region, Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006254. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study, 5th ed. London: Elsevier; 2011. p. 537. p. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Irinyi L, Serena C, Garcia-Hermoso D, Arabatzis M, Desnos-Ollivier M, et al. International Society of Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM)-ITS reference DNA barcoding database—the quality controlled standard tool for routine identification of human and animal pathogenic fungi. Med Mycol Open Access. 2015;53:313–337. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hoang MTV, Irinyi L, Chen SCA, Sorrell TC, Meyer W, et al. Dual DNA barcoding for the molecular identification of the agents of invasive fungal infections. Front Microbiol. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, Taylor AFS, Bengtsson-Palme J, Jeppesen TS, et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D259–D264. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vu D, Groenewald M, Szöke S, Cardinali G, Eberhardt U, et al. DNA barcoding analysis of more than 9 000 yeast isolates contributes to quantitative thresholds for yeast species and genera delimitation. Stud Mycol. 2016;85:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gadagkar SR, Rosenberg MS, Kumar S. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J Exp Zool Pt B. 2005;304B:64–74. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lang JM, Darling AE, Eisen JA. Phylogeny of bacterial and archaeal genomes using conserved genes: supertrees and supermatrices. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, et al. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Shenzhen Code) Adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Glashütten: Koeltz botanical books; 2018. p. 254. p. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular biology and evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES