Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition logoLink to Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
. 2024 Nov 20;76(2):202–209. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.24-173

Characterization of the gut phageome of Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis under endoscopic remission

Akinori Otsuki 1, Ryo Inoue 2, Takayuki Imai 1, Hiroto Miura 2, Atsushi Nishida 1, Osamu Inatomi 1, Akira Andoh 1,*
PMCID: PMC11936741  PMID: 40151403

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the gut phageome in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in endoscopic remission. Fecal samples were collected from 35 UC patients and 22 healthy controls. The gut microbiome was analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, and the phageome was profiled through shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Compared to healthy controls, UC patients showed a significant reduction in phageome richness (observed species and Chao1 index). Principal coordinate analysis revealed a significant difference in beta-diversity between UC and healthy controls (p = 0.001). The abundance of temperate phages was higher in UC (15.2%) compared to healthy controls (5.9%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.088). Temperate phages associated with Coprococcus sp., Bacteroides sp. KFT8, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, as well as virulent phages associated with Ruminococcus gnavus and Lactobacillus farciminis, were increased in UC patients. Conversely, phages associated with Thermosipho affectus, Bacteroides sp. OF03-11BH, and Odoribacter splanchnicus were decreased in UC patients. Phages associated with the genera Odoribacter (p = 0.0004), Ruminococcus (p = 0.009), and Veillonella (p = 0.013) were significantly reduced in UC patients. The gut phageome of inactive UC patients exhibited notable alterations in viral composition compared to healthy controls. These results suggest that changes in the gut phageome might be involved in the pathogenesis of UC.

Keywords: bacteriophage, dysbiosis, Odoribacter splanchnicus phage

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with an unknown etiology.(1) The incidence of IBD is increasing worldwide, particularly in newly industrialized countries with more westernized societies.(2) It is widely accepted that westernized diets and lifestyles modulate the gut microbiota, leading to an increased risk of IBD in genetically susceptible individuals.(3)

The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem composed of billions of commensal microbes, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, archaea and others.(4) It plays a crucial role in maintaining human health by promoting gut barrier integrity, nutrient synthesis, modulation of immune response, and protection against invading pathogens. However, disruption of the gut microbiota, especially its bacterial components, can lead to abnormal immune responses in the mucosa and is significantly involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases.(5,6) Numerous studies have shown that the gut microbiota in patients with IBD is characterized by an increased abundance of Proteobacteria and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes, especially butyrate-producing bacteria.(5,7) In contrast, although viruses are estimated to be nearly ten times more abundant than bacteria in the gut,(5) their involvement in pathophysiological conditions such as IBD is less well-studied compared to bacteria.

The human gut virome consists of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic viruses and maintains gut homeostasis through interactions with the gut microbial community.(810) Bacteriophages (phages), which infect prokaryotic cells (bacteria and archaea), account for approximately 90% of the gut virome. The remaining 10% consists of eukaryotic viruses that infect humans.(11) Phages can be classified into virulent and temperate phages based on their lifestyle.(12) Virulent phages (also known as lytic phages) replicate and proliferate within infected bacterial cells, leading to the release of viral particle through cell rupture (the lytic cycle).(11,13) In contrast, temperate phages (also known as lysogenic phages) undergo both the lysogenic and lytic cycles.(12) During the lysogenic cycle, a temperate phage integrates its genome into the host chromosome (as a prophage), and replicates its genome along with the host chromosome.(12) Under certain conditions, temperate phages can switch to the lytic cycle, resulting in the release of viral particles via the host cell lysis. These different processes significantly impact the gut microbiota and may be closely associated with human diseases.

In the gut virome of healthy individuals, phages from the order Caudovirales or the family Microviridae are predominant.(14,15) In patients with IBD, alterations in the gut virome have been reported in several studies, with recent reviews summarizing these findings.(4,16) The gut virome of IBD patients is generally characterized by a higher abundance of Caudovirales and a lower abundance of Microviridae,(4,16) although there is some variability across studies. There is ongoing debate about whether these changes in the gut virome play a significant role in the development of IBD.(4,16)

In this study, we investigated the gut virome of Japanese patients with UC, as it has not been thoroughly examined in this population before. The fecal microbiota during the active phase of UC is influenced by several factors, such as bleeding, antimicrobial proteins (including immunoglobulins and complements), antimicrobial peptides, and the washing force of diarrhea. To minimize the impact of these factors, we analyzed the gut virome of UC patients with endoscopic remission.

Methods

Ethics

The study protocol received approval from the institutional review boards of Shiga University of Medical Science (approval number 2019-155). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The registration number to the University Hospital Medical Network Center (UMIN) is 000055410.

Patients and sample collection

Fecal samples were collected from 35 patients with endoscopically inactive UC and 22 healthy individuals. The median partial Mayo score was 0 (range 0 to 1),(5) and the median Mayo endoscopic sub score was 0 (0 to 1). No patients were undergoing treatment with antibiotics or probiotics. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and basic characteristics of patients

Healthy
controls
(n = 22)
UC (n = 35)
Female/Male 8/14 16/19
Age (years) 35 (31–46) 41 (32–48)
Smoking history
 Current/Former/Never 0/0/22 1/8/26
Partial Mayo score 0 (0–1)
Mayo endoscopic sub score 0 (0–1)
Disease type
 Proctitis/Left-sided colitis/Pancolitis 3/7/25
Medications
 5-ASA 27 (77.1%)
 Prednisolone 1 (2.9%)
 AZA/6-MP 13 (37.1%)
 anti-TNFα antibodies 4 (11.4%)
 anti-α4β7 integrin antibodies 3 (8.6%)

Values are reported as medians with interquartile ranges. 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; AZA, azathioprine; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine.

Bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

Extraction of bacterial DNA from fecal samples was carried out using Quick Gene DNA tissue kits (Kurabo, Osaka, Japan) as previously described.(17) 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was performed using the MiSeqTM System (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to established methods.(18)

16S rDNA-based taxonomic analysis

Sequence data were processed by QIIME2 (ver. 2024.5)(19) with the DADA2 plugin(20) for chimera checking and amplicon sequence variant definition. Taxonomic assignment was performed using the SILVA138 database.

Enrichment of virus-like particles (VLPs) and viral DNA sequencing

Enrichment of VLPs from fecal samples and viral DNA sequencing was performed according to the methods described in our previous report.(21) In this study, we used the NovaSeq X sequencing system (2 × 150 paired-end reads, NovaSeq X Series 1.5B Reagent Kit).

Virus DNA-based taxonomic analysis

The obtained sequences were first processed using SqueezeMeta (v1.6.2),(22) an automated metagenomic analysis pipeline. Briefly, de novo co-assembly was performed using metaSPAdes.(23) Gene prediction on the resultant contigs was carried out using Prodigal gene prediction software,(24) and homology searches of the genes were performed against the GenBank nr database using Diamond software,(25) Taxonomy for each contig was assigned by a custom script based on the LCA algorithm integrated into SqueezeMeta. To estimate the abundance of each contig in each sample, reads from each sample were mapped onto the contigs using Bowtie2,(26) and the raw number of reads mapped to each contig was extracted using BEDtools.(27)

Next, contigs assigned to viruses with lengths greater than 3,000 bases were extracted and analyzed using PhaBOX,(28) a server for identifying and characterizing phage contigs in metagenomic data. The identified phage contigs and their abundance in each sample were extracted, and this dataset was used as the phage distribution for subsequent analyses.

Statistical analyses

Alpha-diversity indices were calculated using the R “phyloseq” package(29) and analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Beta-diversity was assessed using the UniFrac metric and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, with statistical significance determined by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). MaAsLin2 (Multivariate Association with Linear Models) was employed to identify differentially enriched bacterial or viral taxa while adjusting for confounding factors.(30) Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between the bacteriome and virome.

Results

Alteration in the diversity of gut virome in UC patients

We compared the fecal virome of 35 patients with UC to that of 22 healthy controls. Average clean paired reads were obtained from the enriched fecal VLP samples, with 2,663,349 reads for controls and 1,355,277 reads for UC patients. Compared to healthy controls, UC patients exhibited a significant decrease in phageome richness (observed species and Chao1) but not evenness (Shannon) (Fig. 1A)., indicating a decreased α-diversity (richness) in the gut phageome of UC patients. To evaluate the overall composition of the gut phageome, we utilized the β-diversity index derived from Bray–Curtis distances. Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) demonstrated a significant distinction between UC patients and healthy controls (PERMANOVA p = 0.001) (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that the gut phageome profiles in UC patients are notably different from those in healthy individuals.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Alterations in the diversity and structure of the gut virome in ulcerative colitis. (A) α-diversity of the gut virome of UC and HC. (B) β-diversity of the gut virome of UC and HC. The virome was analyzed and plotted using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the Bray–Curtis distance (PERMANOVA p = 0.001). Statistical significance was determined by Mann–Whitney U test. UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy control; NS, not significant. **p<0.01.

Changes in the gut phageome of UC patients

We conducted a more detailed analysis of the gut phageome. The presence-absence heat map of viral sequences revealed that each healthy control and each UC patient had a unique viral composition (Fig. 2A). Additionally, there were striking differences in the types of phage sequences observed between UC and control samples (Fig. 2B). Although many phage taxa were shared between the control and UC groups, each group also had its own unique phage taxa (present in both: 808; unique to controls: 143; unique to UC: 89) (Fig. 2B). As demonstrated in Fig. 2C, virulent phages were dominant in both controls and UC patients. The proportion of temperate phages tended to be higher in UC patients compared to healthy controls (healthy controls: 5.9%; UC: 15.2%, p = 0.088).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of the gut virome between UC and HC. (A) Heat maps showing the presence or absence of bacteriophages in UC and HC. (B) Venn diagram of bacteriophages in UC patients and healthy controls. (C) Relative abundance of virulent and temperate phages in UC and healthy controls. Statistical significance was determined by t test. UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy control.

To understand the infective nature of phages, we classified them based on their host bacteria and their virulent or temperate characteristics. As shown in Fig. 3, MaAsLin2 analysis revealed that certain phages were found to be more prevalent in UC patients.(30) These include temperate Coprococcus sp. phages, temperate Bacteroides KTF8 phages, virulent Ruminococcus gnavus phages, virulent Lactobacillus farciminis phages, and temperate Faecalibacterium prausnitzii phages. Conversely, some phages were decreased in UC patients, including virulent Thermosipho affectus phages, virulent Bacteroides sp. OF03-11BH phages, virulent and temperate Ruminococcus sp. 1xD21-23 phages, and virulent Odoribacter splanchnicus phages.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Changes in bacteriophages in UC patients. Enriched viral taxa were identified through MaAsLin2 analysis.(30) We used the default settings with a q value threshold of 0.25 and a p value threshold of <0.05 to identify differentially abundant taxa between UC and HC. The x-axis represents the coefficient values calculated by MaAsLin2 analysis. Each phage name is preceded by the contig number. Temperate phages are indicated by shading. UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy control.

To better understand these results, we grouped the phages by the genus of their host bacteria and analyzed the changes in UC patients (Fig. 4). In patients with UC, virulent phages associated with Odoribacter, Ruminococcus, Veillonella, Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, and Ruminococcus were decreased. In contrast, there was an increase in temperate Faecalibacterium phage and virulent phages associated with Xylanimonas, Fischerella, Prevotella, and Streptococcus. Among these findings, the decrease in Odoribacter phages (p = 0.0004), Ruminococcus phages (p = 0.009), and Veillonella phages (p = 0.013) was statistically significant.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Alteration of the abundance of phages categorized by host bacteria. Enriched viral taxa were identified through MaAsLin2 analysis.(30) The top 25 most abundant phages grouped by the host bacteria are shown. **p<0.01, *p<0.05.

Changes in the gut bacteriome in UC patients

The gut bacteriome’s richness, as assessed by observed species and Chao1, and its evenness, measured by Shannon, were significantly lower in UC patients than in healthy controls (Fig. 5A). Additionally, PCoA demonstrated a significant difference in the overall gut bacterial composition between patients and controls (PERMANOVA p = 0.001) (Fig. 5B). The gut bacteriome of UC patients was characterized by a decreased abundance of the genera Fusicatenibacter, Akkermansia, Eubacterium, Alistipes, and Ruminococcus, and an increased abundance of the genera or species including Clostridium, Ruminococcus gnavus (R. gnavus), and Negativibacillus (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Changes in the gut bacteriome of UC. (A) α-diversity of the gut bacteriome of UC and HC. **p<0.01 by Mann–Whitney U test. (B) β-diversity of the gut bacteriome of UC and HC. The bacteriome of UC and HC was plotted using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the UniFrac distance (PERMANOVA p = 0.001). (C) Enriched bacteria in each group were identified through MaAsLin2 analysis.(30) UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy control.

Relationship between the gut bacteriome and phageome in UC and healthy controls

Many phages are capable of infecting and replicating in a variety of bacterial species.(31) To investigate the relationship between the gut phageome and bacteriome in UC patients and healthy controls, we used Spearman’s correlation coefficient to assess the association between bacteria and phages. The number of correlations between the virome and bacteriome was lower in UC patients compared to healthy controls (controls 84 vs UC 39) (Fig. 6). The correlations between the virulent Ruminococcus phage and their bacterial hosts were significantly stronger in the control group (p<0.05). Conversely, the correlations between the temperate Streptococcus phages and their bacterial hosts and virulent Parabacteroides phages and their bacterial hosts were significantly stronger in the UC patients (p<0.05). These results suggest that the homeostatic interactions between the bacterial and viral communities may be altered in UC.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Interactions between gut bacteriome and virome. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was calculated to assess the relationship between the abundance of bacterial and viral taxa. Statistical significance was determined for all pairwise comparisons, with significant correlations indicated (p<0.05, ρ>0.4). The x-axis indicates virus taxa grouped by their host bacterium and the y-axis indicates bacteria taxa. UC, ulcerative colitis; HC, healthy controls.

Discussion

There is a growing body of research highlighting the crucial role of the gut microbiota in the pathophysiology of IBD.(7,9,32) While earlier studies have primarily concentrated on changes in the gut bacteriome, advanced metagenomic sequencing techniques have opened up new avenues to explore alterations in the gut virome across various diseases, including IBD.(9,33) Although it has been reported that Japanese individuals have a unique gut bacteriome,(34) there is limited knowledge about the gut phageome in both health and disease. In this study, we examined the gut phageome in conjunction with the gut bacteriome in Japanese patients with UC under endoscopic remission.

In this study, we found that the gut phageome in Japanese patients with UC is distinct from that of healthy controls, and this difference was associated with bacterial dysbiosis. These results suggest that dysbiosis involving interactions between phages and bacteria may play a role in the pathophysiology of UC. We also observed that both each UC patient and healthy individual exhibited unique viral composition pattern (Fig. 2A and B). This observation aligns with the findings of Reyes et al.,(35) who reported that the gut virome is unique to each individual, irrespective of genetic relationships. Similarly, Pérez-Brocal et al.(36) reported in their virome study of Crohn’s disease that individual variability had a greater impact than the presence of the disease itself. Therefore, when considering changes in the gut phageome of UC patients, it is important to take into account the potential influence of individual variation.

Alpha-diversity (richness and evenness) of the gut bacteriome has been reported to be decreased in IBD patients,(7,13) and this was also confirmed in this study. On the other hand, there is no common observations regarding the α-diversity of the gut virome in IBD. Some reports showed an increase in α-diversity of the gut virome of IBD,(9) while others have found no difference compared to healthy individuals.(33) Recently, Zuo et al.(37) reported a decrease in both richness and evenness of the gut virome in UC patients. In this study, we detected a significant decrease in richness in the gut virome of UC, although there was no difference in evenness. Some aspects of these conflicting results may be attributed to variations in virome studies, such as differences in virus reference databases and methodologies for virus enrichment.(10)

We observed that the relative abundance of temperate phages appeared to increase in UC patients compared to healthy controls. It has been reported that a stable core of predominant virulent phages is associated with maintaining a healthy human gut, and that environmental stresses related to mucosal inflammation can trigger a reservoir of integrated prophages (lysogenic state) to enter the lytic cycle.(33) This process may be connected to the reduction in bacterial α-diversity observed in UC patients as observed in this study. Additionally, increased prophage induction and cell lysis could lead to higher levels of inflammatory bacterial debris, which in turn stimulates the local innate immune response.(38) Thus, the temperate phageome may respond to inflammatory stimuli, thereby altering the host bacterial population in IBD. Clooney et al.(33) proposed that a shift from lysogenic to lytic replication cycles is associated with an increase in the relative abundance of temperate phages in disease. Our observation in this study suggests that the conditions in the inflamed mucosa of UC patients, even in endoscopic remission, may not be able to maintain a stable core phageome.

It has been reported that many phages can infect and replicate in various bacterial hosts, and that different lineages within a single bacterial species can exhibit varying levels of resistance to a specific phage.(10) Consequently, establishing meaningful one-to-one correlations between phages and bacteria is challenging. In addition, progress has been made, but a significant portion of the sequencing data could not be assigned a virome database.(16) So, we grouped phages by host bacteria for further analyses. As a result, we found that the gut virome in UC patients differs markedly from that in healthy controls. This change in the virome was accompanied by the alterations of the bacteriome. The structural shift in the virome of UC patients was characterized by a decrease in virulent phages associated with Odoribacter, Ruminococcus, Veillonella, Bacteroides, Bacillus, and Bifidobacterium, and an increase in virulent Xylanimonas phages, temperate Faecalibacterium phages, and virulent Fischrella phages. In particular, the decrease in Odoribacter phages, Ruminococcus phages, and Veillonella phages were significant.

The decrease in virulent Odoribacter phages was accompanied by a reduced abundance of the genus Odoribacter. This might reflect cell lysis associated with the lytic effect of virulent Odoribacter phages targeting Odoribacter splanchnicus. Odoribacter splanchnicus has been reported to play an important role in protective immunity linked to Th17 immune responses.(39) It promotes mucosal healing during colitis by modulating regulatory T-cell responses and contributing to gut health. Odoribacter is a key bacterium that supports both metabolic and immune cell protection against colitis. Therefore, a significant decrease in the genus Odoribacter is considered indicative of reduced protective activity against mucosal inflammation.

As depicted in Fig. 3, virulent Ruminococcus gnavus phages engaged in patients with UC, and this was accompanied by an increased abundance of R. gnavus within the bacteriome. These results are consistent with recent findings by Buttimer et al.(40) R. gnavus is a gram-positive anaerobic bacterium commonly found in the gut microbiome of individuals, and recent literature categorizes it within the Lachnospiraceae family.(40) R. gnavus uses mucins as a nutrient source, which facilitates direct interaction with epithelial cells and luminal antigens, thereby promoting mucosal inflammation. Notably, R. gnavus is highly prevalent among patients with IBD,(7,40) and its growth often correlates with disease flare-ups.(7) These observations suggest that the proinflammatory environment driven by R. gnavus is associated with an increased abundance of virulent Ruminococcus gnavus phages.

There are some limitations in this study. First, the analysis was conducted on a small sample size, specifically limited to patients with UC. To fully understand the significance of alterations in the gut virome, a larger cohort that includes both CD and UC patients is necessary. Second, we enrolled patients with endoscopic remission, as bleeding and the secretion of anti-bacterial peptides/proteins during active disease significantly affect the gut bacteriome. To understand the changes in the virome under inflammatory conditions, it will also be necessary to examine patients under their active phase in the future.

In conclusion, this study represents the first report on the gut virome of Japanese patients with UC. The gut virome of inactive UC patients exhibits significant alterations in viral composition compared to healthy controls. These changes in the gut virome may contribute to the bacterial dysbiosis observed in UC patients. While establishing direct one-to-one correlations between phages and bacteria may be challenging, further research is required to explore the crucial interactions between the virome and bacteriome in the development of UC.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, performing experiments, data collection and analysis were performed by AO and TI. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RI and AA, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan under grant number 22K08054 (AA), and in part by Grants from the Japan Sciences Research Grant for Research on Intractable Diseases (Japanese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Group) affiliated with the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare under grant number 20FC1027.

Conflict of Interest

AA receiving lecture fee from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AbbVie GK, and Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this study.

References

  • 1.Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2007; 448: 427–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017; 390: 2769–2778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Understanding and preventing the global increase of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 313–321.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jansen D, Matthijnssens J. The emerging role of the gut virome in health and inflammatory bowel disease: challenges, covariates and a viral imbalance. Viruses 2023; 15: 173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andoh A, Nishida A. Alteration of the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Digestion 2023; 104: 16–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sartor RB, Wu GD. Roles for intestinal bacteria, viruses, and fungi in pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases and therapeutic approaches. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 327–339.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nishino K, Nishida A, Inoue R, et al. Analysis of endoscopic brush samples identified mucosa-associated dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol 2018; 53: 95–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Norman JM, Handley SA, Virgin HW. Kingdom-agnostic metagenomics and the importance of complete characterization of enteric microbial communities. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 1459–1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Norman JM, Handley SA, Baldridge MT, et al. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell 2015; 160: 447–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tisza MJ, Buck CB. A catalog of tens of thousands of viruses from human metagenomes reveals hidden associations with chronic diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118: e2023202118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maronek M, Link R, Ambro L, Gardlik R. Phages and their role in gastrointestinal disease: focus on inflammatory bowel disease. Cells 2020; 9: 1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu S, Fang Z, Tan J, et al. DeePhage: distinguishing virulent and temperate phage-derived sequences in metavirome data with a deep learning approach. Gigascience 2021; 10: giab056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ungaro F, Massimino L, D'Alessio S, Danese S. The gut virome in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: from metagenomics to novel therapeutic approaches. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 999–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Minot S, Bryson A, Chehoud C, Wu GD, Lewis JD, Bushman FD. Rapid evolution of the human gut virome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 12450–12455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Waller AS, Yamada T, Kristensen DM, et al. Classification and quantification of bacteriophage taxa in human gut metagenomes. ISME J 2014; 8: 1391–1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tun HM, Peng Y, Massimino L, et al. Gut virome in inflammatory bowel disease and beyond. Gut 2024; 73: 350–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matsumoto M, Inoue R, Tsuruta T, Hara H, Yajima T. Long-term oral administration of cows’ milk improves insulin sensitivity in rats fed a high-sucrose diet. Br J Nutr 2009; 102: 1324–1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Inoue R, Sakaue Y, Sawai C, et al. A preliminary investigation on the relationship between gut microbiota and gene expressions in peripheral mononuclear cells of infants with autism spectrum disorders. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2016; 80: 2450–2458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37: 852–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 2016; 13: 581–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Imai T, Inoue R, Nishida A, et al. Features of the gut prokaryotic virome of Japanese patients with Crohn’s disease. J Gastroenterol 2022; 57: 559–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tamames J, Puente-Sánchez F. SqueezeMeta, a highly portable, fully automatic metagenomic analysis pipeline. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 3349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 2017; 27: 824–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: 119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 2015; 12: 59–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 357–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: 841–842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shang J, Peng C, Liao H, Tang X, Sun Y. PhaBOX: a web server for identifying and characterizing phage contigs in metagenomic data. Bioinform Adv 2023; 3: vbad101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 2013; 8: e61217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, et al. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17: e1009442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kauffman KM, Hussain FA, Yang J, et al. A major lineage of non-tailed dsDNA viruses as unrecognized killers of marine bacteria. Nature 2018; 554: 118–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Imai T, Inoue R, Kawada Y, et al. Characterization of fungal dysbiosis in Japanese patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 149–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Clooney AG, Sutton TDS, Shkoporov AN, et al. Whole-virome analysis sheds light on viral dark matter in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Host Microbe 2019; 26: 764–778.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nishijima S, Suda W, Oshima K, et al. The gut microbiome of healthy Japanese and its microbial and functional uniqueness. DNA Res 2016; 23: 125–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N, et al. Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature 2010; 466: 334–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pérez-Brocal V, García-López R, Nos P, Beltrán B, Moret I, Moya A. Metagenomic analysis of Crohn’s disease patients identifies changes in the virome and microbiome related to disease status and therapy, and detects potential interactions and biomarkers. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 2515–2532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zuo T, Lu XJ, Zhang Y, et al. Gut mucosal virome alterations in ulcerative colitis. Gut 2019; 68: 1169–1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gogokhia L, Round JL. Immune-bacteriophage interactions in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr Opin Virol 2021; 49: 30–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xing C, Wang M, Ajibade AA, et al. Microbiota regulate innate immune signaling and protective immunity against cancer. Cell Host Microbe 2021; 29: 959–974.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Buttimer C, Khokhlova EV, Stein L, et al. Temperate bacteriophages infecting the mucin-degrading bacterium Ruminococcus gnavus from the human gut. Gut Microbes 2023; 15: 2194794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition are provided here courtesy of The Society for Free Radical Research Japan

RESOURCES