Skip to main content
Radiology Case Reports logoLink to Radiology Case Reports
. 2025 Mar 15;20(6):2637–2641. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2025.02.028

Prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia and postnatal identification of cleft soft palate: A case report

Saburi Singhania 1,, Shivali Kashikar 1, Vaishali Dhawan 1, Pratapsingh Parihar 1
PMCID: PMC11937608  PMID: 40151285

Abstract

This case report details the prenatal diagnosis of fetal micrognathia using advanced ultrasound techniques and highlights its role in anomaly detection and perinatal management. A 33-year-old primigravida presented for routine antenatal care at 30 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound revealed mandibular hypoplasia with an Inferior Facial Angle (IFA) of 46.2° (below the diagnostic threshold of 50°) and a reduced Jaw Index, confirming micrognathia. Three-dimensional ultrasound provided additional visualization of the retronasal triangle, where the absence of a normal mandibular gap further supported the diagnosis. Biometric parameters, including head circumference and femur length, were within normal limits. The neonate, delivered at 38 weeks via spontaneous labor, weighed 3.2 kg with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. Postnatal examination confirmed micrognathia and revealed a cleft soft palate, undetected on prenatal imaging. No airway intervention was required at birth, and surgical correction of the cleft palate was planned at 8 months of age. We present a case that underscores the reliability of prenatal ultrasound, particularly the use of objective criteria like IFA and Jaw Index, in diagnosing micrognathia. It also highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management for optimizing outcomes and addressing associated anomalies. The findings emphasize the need for comprehensive postnatal evaluation and continued advancements in prenatal imaging techniques.

Keywords: Cleft Palate, Congenital abnormalities, Mandibular abnormalities, Micrognathism, Prenatal diagnosis

Introduction

Micrognathia is a craniofacial abnormality characterized by an undersized or recessed lower jaw (mandible), often associated with cleft palate and systemic conditions like Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) and Treacher Collins Syndrome [1,2]. Early prenatal diagnosis is crucial for managing postnatal complications such as airway obstruction and feeding difficulties [3]. Historically dependent on postnatal examination, the advent of ultrasound revolutionized prenatal care. Advancements from 2D to 3D and 4D imaging now enable detailed assessments of fetal anatomy [4].

Ultrasound remains the primary diagnostic tool. The Inferior Facial Angle (IFA), measured in the mid-sagittal plane, is critical for assessing mandibular anomalies, with angles below 50° indicating micrognathia and those near 45.5° sensitive for severe cases like PRS [[5], [6], [7], [8]]. Biometric measurements, such as mandibular length and the jaw index, further enhance accuracy. 3D ultrasonography improves visualization and spatial assessment, increasing diagnostic sensitivity and specificity [2]. Doppler imaging aids in evaluating fetal blood flow in syndromic cases [9].

Diagnostic protocols involve 2D ultrasound screening in the second trimester, with 3D imaging and genetic testing for confirmation [6]. Studies report IFA's sensitivity and specificity at 84% and 81%, respectively, for detecting micrognathia [6]. Early diagnosis facilitates multidisciplinary care, improving outcomes for affected infants [1,10].

This case report highlights the role of ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia, focusing on objective diagnostic criteria, associated anomalies, and the significance of interdisciplinary management. It underscores the importance of integrating advanced imaging techniques with clinical evaluations for better detection and prognosis.

Case presentation

A 33-year-old primigravida presented at 30 + 0 weeks of gestation for a routine antenatal clinic visit at our hospital. The patient's heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration levels were within established reference ranges. Physical examination revealed no abnormalities, and the patient reported no significant medical or family history. Biometric measurements, including head circumference, femur length, biparietal diameter, belly circumference, and color Doppler flow of the fetus, were all within expected limits.

During routine ultrasound, a midsagittal view of the fetal profile revealed mandibular hypoplasia, raising suspicion of micrognathia (Fig. 1). The Inferior Facial Angle (IFA) was measured at 46.2°, which is below the diagnostic threshold of 50°, confirming the condition. The IFA was measured as the angle between a line perpendicular to the forehead at the nasofrontal suture and a line connecting the mentum tip to the most anterior aspect of the upper lip (Fig. 2). Additionally, the Jaw Index, calculated as the ratio of anteroposterior mandibular diameter (APD) to biparietal diameter (BPD), was below the normal threshold of 23%, further supporting the diagnosis of micrognathia.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Postnatal photograph of the neonate showing micrognathia.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Two-dimensional ultrasound image of gestational age 30 weeks illustrating the measurement of the Inferior Facial Angle (IFA) at 46.2°, confirming fetal micrognathia. The IFA is measured between a line perpendicular to the nasofrontal suture and a line from the tip of the mentum to the upper lip.

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound examinations enhanced the diagnostic confidence by providing additional visualization of the mandibular anatomy (Fig. 3). The retronasal triangle, typically showing a distinct mandibular gap, was absent in this case, a known marker of mandibular hypoplasia. These findings were corroborated during a follow-up ultrasound at 35 weeks gestation, confirming the stability of the anomaly.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Three-dimensional ultrasound image of showed fetal profile depicting micrognathia at gestational age of 35 weeks.

The patient underwent regular antenatal monitoring until delivery. At 38 weeks of gestation, the patient went into spontaneous labor and delivered a female neonate weighing 3.2 kg. Apgar scores were 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. A multidisciplinary team, including obstetricians, pediatricians, and congenital anomaly specialists, assessed the neonate at birth. Physical examination confirmed micrognathia without glossoptosis, and no postnatal airway intervention was required.

Further evaluation revealed a cleft soft palate, identified upon visual inspection of the oral cavity. This finding, undetected during prenatal imaging, underscores the limitations of ultrasound in visualizing posterior clefts. Following neonatal assessment, the family was referred to surgical specialists at the Stomatology Hospital. Surgical repair of the cleft palate was recommended at approximately 8 months of age.

This case demonstrates the utility of advanced ultrasound techniques, including objective parameters such as IFA and Jaw Index, in diagnosing micrognathia. The integration of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging further enhanced diagnostic accuracy. Although no additional anomalies were identified prenatally, the postnatal discovery of a cleft soft palate highlights the importance of comprehensive neonatal evaluation. The coordinated efforts of a multidisciplinary team ensured optimal care and long-term planning for the infant.

Discussion

Micrognathia, characterized by mandibular hypoplasia and a receding chin, is a notable anomaly with significant clinical implications. Early prenatal diagnosis plays a vital role in preparing for potential neonatal complications, including airway obstruction, feeding difficulties, and associated structural anomalies. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of ultrasound imaging, particularly the use of objective parameters such as the Inferior Facial Angle (IFA) and Jaw Index, in diagnosing micrognathia [[5], [6], [7], [8]].

The IFA, measured in the midsagittal view of the fetal profile, is a reliable diagnostic criterion for micrognathia. An IFA less than 45.5° is associated with a high sensitivity (84%) and specificity (81%) for identifying micrognathia and conditions such as Pierre Robin Sequence [6]. Similarly, the Jaw Index, calculated as the ratio of anteroposterior diameter (APD) to biparietal diameter (BPD), provides additional diagnostic value, particularly in late gestation. A Jaw Index of less than 23% is indicative of micrognathia, as was observed in this case [11].

The retronasal triangle view, which evaluates the presence of a mandibular gap, is another important marker for micrognathia [11]. In this case, the absence of a normal mandibular gap was consistent with the diagnosis. Three-dimensional ultrasound further enhanced the accuracy of anatomical assessment, particularly in confirming mandibular abnormalities and visualizing the retronasal triangle. These findings align with existing literature that highlights the role of 3D imaging in improving diagnostic confidence [1,12].

Despite these advancements, certain limitations in ultrasound diagnostics persist. For instance, while ultrasound can reliably detect anterior clefts involving the alveolar ridge, it is less effective in identifying posterior clefts, as evidenced by the postnatal discovery of a cleft soft palate in this case [10]. This limitation underscores the importance of comprehensive postnatal examinations to confirm and expand upon prenatal findings.

The detection of micrognathia should prompt further evaluation for associated anomalies, as it is frequently linked with syndromic conditions. Pierre Robin sequence, Treacher Collins syndrome, and trisomy 18 are among the most common associations [6]. Fetal echocardiography and genetic testing, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or whole exome sequencing, are recommended to assess for accompanying cardiac defects, chromosomal abnormalities, or genetic syndromes [13]. Although such investigations were not pursued in this case, their role in guiding perinatal planning and parental counseling cannot be understated.

Management of micrognathia involves a multidisciplinary approach, particularly in cases with severe associated anomalies or syndromic conditions. Early diagnosis allows for delivery planning in a facility equipped to handle neonatal airway emergencies, as was done in this case. Neonates with significant micrognathia may require immediate airway management, such as intubation or tracheostomy, to address glossoptosis and obstructive apnea [10]. Feeding difficulties and developmental delays are common complications, necessitating long-term follow-up and interventions [3].

In this case, the prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia guided perinatal decision-making and highlighted the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. The postnatal confirmation of a cleft soft palate further underscored the need for comprehensive neonatal evaluation and ongoing care [14]. Future advances in imaging modalities, such as fetal MRI, may complement ultrasound in detecting complex craniofacial anomalies and further enhance diagnostic accuracy [15].

This case emphasizes the significance of standardized diagnostic criteria, such as the IFA and Jaw Index, in prenatal evaluations. These tools, combined with detailed anomaly screening, provide valuable insights into the nature and severity of micrognathia [[5], [6], [7], [8]]. Additionally, the findings underscore the limitations of prenatal imaging and the need for postnatal assessment to identify anomalies that may elude detection during gestation [10].

Conclusion

This case underscores the critical role of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of fetal micrognathia. The use of objective criteria, such as the Inferior Facial Angle and Jaw Index, facilitated early and accurate diagnosis, enabling effective perinatal planning. Although prenatal ultrasound demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, the postnatal identification of a cleft soft palate highlighted its limitations, particularly in detecting posterior anomalies.

The case also emphasizes the importance of further investigations to evaluate for associated anomalies. While genetic testing and fetal echocardiography were not performed in this instance, they remain essential components of comprehensive prenatal care for micrognathia, particularly given its frequent association with syndromic conditions.

Management of micrognathia requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving obstetricians, neonatologists, geneticists, and pediatric surgeons. Early diagnosis enables preparations for potential neonatal complications, such as airway obstruction and feeding difficulties, and allows for timely surgical interventions. This case highlights the need for continued advancements in prenatal imaging and the importance of standardized diagnostic protocols to optimize outcomes for affected infants and their families.

Patient consent

Written, informed consent for the publication of this case report, including accompanying images and data, was obtained from the from the parents of the patient involved. The consent ensures that they understand the nature of the publication and have agreed to share the information for academic and educational purposes. This consent documentation is retained securely for our records in compliance with institutional guidelines.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments: Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Tonni G., Peixoto A.B., Werner H., Grisolia G., Ruano R., Sepulveda F., et al. Ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging: clinical performance in the prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts and mandibular abnormalities. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023;51:346–361. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen C.P., Hsu C.Y., Chern S.R., Wu P.S., Chen S.W., Wu F.T., et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a 1.651-mb 19q13.42-q13.43 microdeletion in a fetus with micrognathia and bilateral pyelectasis on prenatal ultrasound. Taiwan J Obstetr Gynecol. 2020;59:763–765. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mouthon L., Busa T., Bretelle F., Karmous-Benailly H., Missirian C., Philip N., et al. Prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia in 41 fetuses: retrospective analysis of outcome and genetic etiologies. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:2365–2373. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soma-Pillay P., Lombaard H. Review: 2D, 3D, 4D ultrasound in obstetrics: best evidence practice. Obstetr Gynaecol Forum. 2010;20 doi: 10.4314/ogf.v20i2.59322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sanz-Cortés M., Gómez O., Puerto B. Elsevier; 2018. Micrognathia and retrognathia. Obstetric imaging: fetal diagnosis and care; pp. 321–327. e1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nguyen J.Q.N., Calabrese C.E., Heaphy K.J., Koudstaal M.J., Estroff J.A., Resnick C.M. Can Robin sequence Be predicted from prenatal ultrasonography? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78:612–618. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rotten D., Levaillant J.M., Martinez H., Le Pointe H.D., Vicaut É. The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:122–130. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00622.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cang Z., Cui J., Pei J., Wang Z., Du Y., Mu S., et al. Prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia: a systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1161421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mak A.S.L., Leung K.Y. Prenatal ultrasonography of craniofacial abnormalities. Ultrasonography. 2019;38:13–24. doi: 10.14366/usg.18031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vettraino I. Clinical outcome of fetuses with sonographic diagnosis of isolated micrognathia. Obstetr Gynecol. 2003;102:801–805. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00672-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Antonakopoulos N., Bhide A. Focus on prenatal detection of micrognathia. J Fetal Med. 2019;06:107–112. doi: 10.1007/s40556-019-00210-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li W-J, Wang X-Q, Yan R-L, Xiang J-W. Clinical significance of first-trimester screening of the retronasal triangle for identification of primary cleft palate. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38:135–141. doi: 10.1159/000369797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Copel J.A., Pilu G., Kleinman C.S. Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: associations and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1986;154:1121–1132. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90773-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Y., Wang Y., Yao M., Chen L., Wu S., Liu Y. Prenatal diagnosis of Treacher Collins syndrome: a case report and literature review. Intl J Gynecol Obste. 2023;163:778–781. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yuan W., Deng Z., Peng X., Guan X., Mao H., Song T., et al. Accurate prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate using magnetic resonance imaging with slice-to-volume reconstruction. Appl Magn Reson. 2020;51:23–32. doi: 10.1007/s00723-019-01161-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Radiology Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES