Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 Dec;345:87–105. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014967

Plasticity in the binocular correspondence of striate cortical receptive fields in kittens.

M R Dürsteler, R von der Heydt
PMCID: PMC1193786  PMID: 6663515

Abstract

The influence of visual experience on the correspondence in position and orientation of receptive fields in the two eyes of cortical neurones was studied. Kittens were reared viewing the environment through lenses that magnified the image by 9% in one direction (meridional size lenses) with axes of magnification oriented 45 degrees left and right of vertical for the two eyes. The unequal deformations in the two eyes produced gradients of position disparity and systematic variation of orientation disparity which could not be influenced by eye movements. Two types of arrangement of the lenses, producing opposite disparities, were used; each was worn by two kittens. The receptive fields of cortical neurones were studied in the four kittens aged 3-4 months. In the binocular cells, the positions of the response fields were plotted, and the preferred orientations determined, using automatic stimulus variation, quantitative analysis, and eye-drift correction. By means of regression analysis, the degree of 'interocular deformation' was assessed; a coefficient D was derived from the positions, an angle beta from the orientations. D specified the position incongruity as a fraction of retinal eccentricity, beta the difference between the orientation incongruities of cells with near-vertical and near-horizontal receptive fields. Both D and beta were found to be of opposite signs in the two groups of kittens, as predicted by the optical effects of the lenses. The difference in D between the groups was 0.197 (predicted: 0.172); the difference in beta was 17.0 degrees (predicted: 18.9 degrees). Thus, the difference in visual environment had been completely compensated by adjustments in the positions as well as the orientations of the receptive fields. Since D and beta are independent of the alignment of the eyes, the differences between the groups reflected different functional connexions at the cortical level. Possible advantages of plasticity for the development of binocular vision are discussed. It is argued that the plasticity demonstrated here reflects a more general property of cortical receptive fields.

Full text

PDF
87

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BISHOP P. O., KOZAK W., VAKKUR G. J. Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co-ordinates and optics. J Physiol. 1962 Oct;163:466–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow H. B., Blakemore C., Pettigrew J. D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):327–342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blakemore C., Fiorentini A., Maffei L. A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol. 1972 Nov;226(3):725–749. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore C., Van Sluyters R. C., Peck C. K., Hein A. Development of cat visual cortex following rotation of one eye. Nature. 1975 Oct 16;257(5527):584–586. doi: 10.1038/257584a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruce C. J., Isley M. R., Shinkman P. G. Visual experience and development of interocular orientation disparity in visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Aug;46(2):215–228. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.2.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper M. L., Pettigrew J. D. A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owl. J Comp Neurol. 1979 Mar 1;184(1):1–26. doi: 10.1002/cne.901840102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crewther S. G., Crewther D. P., Peck C. K., Pettigrew J. D. Visual cortical effects of rearing cats with monocular or binocular cyclotorsion. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Jul;44(1):97–118. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.44.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirsch H. V., Spinelli D. N. Modification of the distribution of receptive field orientation in cats by selective visual exposure during development. Exp Brain Res. 1971 Jun 29;12(5):509–527. doi: 10.1007/BF00234246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirsch H. V., Spinelli D. N. Visual experience modifies distribution of horizontally and vertically oriented receptive fields in cats. Science. 1970 May 15;168(3933):869–871. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3933.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1041–1059. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hänny P., Von Der Heydt R. The effect of horizontal-plane environment on the development of binocular receptive fields of cells in cat visual cortex. J Physiol. 1982 Aug;329:75–92. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Joshua D. E., Bishop P. O. Binocular single vision and depth discrimination. Receptive field disparities for central and peripheral vision and binocular interaction on peripheral single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1970;10(4):389–416. doi: 10.1007/BF02324766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nelson J. I., Kato H., Bishop P. O. Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat straite cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Mar;40(2):260–283. doi: 10.1152/jn.1977.40.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pettigrew J. D., Freeman R. D. Visual experience without lines: effect on developing cortical neurons. Science. 1973 Nov 9;182(4112):599–601. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4112.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pettigrew J. D. The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;237(1):49–74. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sherman S. M. Development of interocular alignment in cats. Brain Res. 1972 Feb 25;37(2):187–203. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90666-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shinkman P. G., Bruce C. J. Binocular differences in cortical receptive fields of kittens after rotationally disparate binocular experience. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):285–287. doi: 10.1126/science.877554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shlaer R. Shift in binocular disparity causes compensatory change in the cortical structure of kittens. Science. 1971 Aug 13;173(3997):638–641. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3997.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Sluyters R. C., Blakemore C. Experimental creation of unusual neuronal properties in visual cortex of kitten. Nature. 1973 Dec 21;246(5434):506–508. doi: 10.1038/246506a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WIESEL T. N., HUBEL D. H. SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:1003–1017. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wiesel T. N., Hubel D. H. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1029–1040. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yinon U. Eye rotation in developing kittens: the effect on ocular dominance and receptive field organization of cortical cells. Exp Brain Res. 1975 Dec 22;24(2):215–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00234065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. von der Heydt R., Adorjani C., Hänny P., Baumgartner G. Disparity sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1978 Apr 14;31(4):523–545. doi: 10.1007/BF00239810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES