Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 Oct;343:147–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014886

Dependence of the single photon response on longitudinal position of absorption in toad rod outer segments.

J L Schnapf
PMCID: PMC1193913  PMID: 6417323

Abstract

Light responses were recorded from toad rods in order to study the dependence of the kinetics and amplitude of the single photon response on the longitudinal position of excitation within the rod outer segment. Membrane current was recorded from the inner segment of an isolated rod with a suction electrode while stimulating the outer segment with a dim transverse slit of light. Flashes at the tip of the outer segment gave smaller average responses than flashes at the base. Comparison of amplitude histograms from the two positions revealed that the fraction of incident photons eliciting an electrical response was the same at tip and base. Characteristic differences in flash sensitivity are therefore attributed to differences in the amplitude of the single photon response. Flash responses from the tip were slower than those from the base. For most cells, the tip response could be fitted by the same multistage filter equation that fitted the base response when only one of the filter time constants was increased. For both tip and base responses, the ensemble variance as a function of time was proportional to the square of the ensemble average. This indicates that single photon responses had the same wave form as their respective averages, and that there was no significant contribution of fluctuations in response latency to the wave form of the average. Background light reduced flash sensitivity at the tip more than at the base. The calculated cable attenuation of rod outer segments is not sufficient to explain the observed differences between the responses of the tip and base. The differences might instead be associated with a longitudinal gradient of internal sodium concentration, or with ageing of the outer segment discs. Calculations suggest that in the intact eye, the amplitude and time course of the average electrical response to absorption of a photon should depend slightly on the wave-length of the photon.

Full text

PDF
147

Images in this article

158-2Plate 1
on p.158-2

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baylor D. A., Hodgkin A. L., Lamb T. D. The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):685–727. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baylor D. A., Lamb T. D. Local effects of bleaching in retinal rods of the toad. J Physiol. 1982 Jul;328:49–71. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baylor D. A., Lamb T. D., Yau K. W. Responses of retinal rods to single photons. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:613–634. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baylor D. A., Lamb T. D., Yau K. W. The membrane current of single rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:589–611. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baylor D. A., Matthews G., Yau K. W. Temperature effects on the membrane current of retinal rods of the toad. J Physiol. 1983 Apr;337:723–734. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baylor D. A., Matthews G., Yau K. W. Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:591–621. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blaustein M. P., Hodgkin A. L. The effect of cyanide on the efflux of calcium from squid axons. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(2):497–527. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bownds D., Brodie A., Robinson W. E., Palmer R. D., Miller J., Shedlovsky A. Proceedings: Physiology and enzymology of frog photoreceptor membranes. Exp Eye Res. 1974 Mar;18(3):253–269. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(74)90153-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown J. E., Pinto L. H. Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;236(3):575–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dennis M. J., Sargent P. B. Multiple innervation of normal and re-innervated parasympathetic neurones in the frog cardiac ganglion. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:63–75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fain G. L. Sensitivity of toad rods: Dependence on wave-length and background illumination. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;261(1):71–101. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gold G. H., Korenbrot J. I. Light-induced calcium release by intact retinal rods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5557–5561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hagins W. A., Yoshikami S. Ionic mechanisms in excitation of photoreceptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Dec 30;264:314–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb31492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hemilä S., Reuter T. Longitudinal spread of adaptation in the rods of the frog's retina. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:501–528. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lamb T. D., McNaughton P. A., Yau K. W. Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1981;319:463–496. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Naka K. I., Rushton W. A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):536–555. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Penn R. D., Hagins W. A. Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods. Biophys J. 1972 Aug;12(8):1073–1094. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86145-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sillman A. J., Ito H., Tomita T. Studies on the mass receptor potential of the isolated frog retina. II. On the basis of the ionic mechanism. Vision Res. 1969 Dec;9(12):1443–1451. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wong F., Knight B. W., Dodge F. A. Dispersion of latencies in photoreceptors of Limulus and the adapting-bump model. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Nov;76(5):517–537. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.5.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yau K. W., McNaughton P. A., Hodgkin A. L. Effect of ions on the light-sensitive current in retinal rods. Nature. 1981 Aug 6;292(5823):502–505. doi: 10.1038/292502a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoshikami S., George J. S., Hagins W. A. Light-induced calcium fluxes from outer segment layer of vertebrate retinas. Nature. 1980 Jul 24;286(5771):395–398. doi: 10.1038/286395a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Young R. W. The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments. J Cell Biol. 1967 Apr;33(1):61–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.33.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES