Abstract
The properties of chemoreceptor and baroreceptor neurones in the petrosal ganglion of the cat were examined in vitro with intracellular micro-electrodes. Chemoreceptor neurones with myelinated axons (average conduction velocity, 11 m/s) showed action potentials with a hump on the falling phase, followed by a prolonged after-hyperpolarization (average duration, 260 ms). The duration of the hump present in the action potential of chemoreceptor neurones was positively correlated with the duration of the after-hyperpolarization. In response to prolonged depolarization, chemoreceptor neurones showed only one or a few action potentials at the beginning of the depolarization. Two types of baroreceptors neurones with myelinated axons were found: fast (F) baroreceptors (average conduction velocity, 33 m/s) and slow (S) baroreceptors (average conduction velocity, 10 m/s). F baroreceptors had action potentials without a hump followed by a short after-hyperpolarization (average duration, 43 ms), while S baroreceptors had spikes similar to those found in chemoreceptors except for a shorter hyperpolarization (average duration, 145 ms). Both types of baroreceptor neurones fired repetitively throughout prolonged depolarization. It is concluded that, in the petrosal ganglion, primary sensory neurones originating a given type of sensory terminal share a particular set of electrophysiological properties.
Full text
PDF











Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barrett E. F., Barret J. N. Separation of two voltage-sensitive potassium currents, and demonstration of a tetrodotoxin-resistant calcium current in frog motoneurones. J Physiol. 1976 Mar;255(3):737–774. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyd I. A., Kalu K. U. Scaling factor relating conduction velocity and diameter for myelinated afferent nerve fibres in the cat hind limb. J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:277–297. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czéh G., Gallego R., Kudo N., Kuno M. Evidence for the maintenance of motoneurone properties by muscle activity. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:239–252. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czéh G., Kudo N., Kuno M. Membrane properties and conduction velocity in sensory neurones following central or peripheral axotomy. J Physiol. 1977 Aug;270(1):165–180. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dichter M. A., Fischbach G. D. The action potential of chick dorsal root ganglion neurones maintained in cell culture. J Physiol. 1977 May;267(2):281–298. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EYZAGUIRRE C., LEWIN J. Effect of different oxygen tensions on the carotid body in vitro. J Physiol. 1961 Dec;159:238–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fidone S. J., Sato A. A study of chemoreceptor and baroreceptor A and C-fibres in the cat carotid nerve. J Physiol. 1969 Dec;205(3):527–548. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallego R., Eyzaguirre C. Membrane and action potential characteristics of A and C nodose ganglion cells studied in whole ganglia and in tissue slices. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Sep;41(5):1217–1232. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.5.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallego R., Eyzaguirre C., Monti-Bloch L. Thermal and osmotic responses of arterial receptors. J Neurophysiol. 1979 May;42(3):665–680. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.3.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallego R. The ionic basis of action potentials in petrosal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1983 Sep;342:591–602. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Görke K., Pierau F. K. Spike potentials and membrane properties of dorsal root ganglion cells in pigeons. Pflugers Arch. 1980 Jul;386(1):21–28. doi: 10.1007/BF00584182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ITO M., SAIGA M. The mode of impulse conduction through the spinal ganglion. Jpn J Physiol. 1959 Mar 25;9(1):33–42. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.9.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ITO M. The electrical activity of spinal ganglion cells investigated with intracellular microelectrodes. Jpn J Physiol. 1957 Dec 20;7(4):297–323. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.7.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llinás R., Yarom Y. Electrophysiology of mammalian inferior olivary neurones in vitro. Different types of voltage-dependent ionic conductances. J Physiol. 1981 Jun;315:549–567. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McQueen D. S. Effects of acetylcholine and sodium cyanide on cat carotid baroreceptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1980 Jul;69(3):433–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb07032.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pineda A., Maxwell D. S., Kruger L. The fine structure of neurons and satellite cells in the trigeminal ganglion of cat and monkey. Am J Anat. 1967 Nov;121(3):461–487. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001210304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ransom B. R., Holz R. W. Ionic determinants of excitability in cultured mouse dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord cells. Brain Res. 1977 Nov 18;136(3):445–453. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stensaas L. J., Fidone S. J. An ultrastructural study of cat petrosal ganglia: a search for autonomic ganglion cells. Brain Res. 1977 Mar 18;124(1):29–39. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90861-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida S., Matsuda Y., Samejima A. Tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium and calcium components of action potentials in dorsal root ganglion cells of the adult mouse. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Sep;41(5):1096–1106. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.5.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida S., Matsuda Y. Studies on sensory neurons of the mouse with intracellular-recording and horseradish peroxidase-injection techniques. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Jul;42(4):1134–1145. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.4.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
