Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 Sep;342:633–654. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014873

Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand.

J Ochoa, E Torebjörk
PMCID: PMC1193981  PMID: 6631752

Abstract

Intraneural microstimulation (i.n.m.s.) was performed in awake human volunteers, using tungsten micro-electrodes inserted into median and ulnar nerve fascicles supplying the skin of the hand. The same electrodes were used alternatively to record impulse activity from single nerve fibres at the i.n.m.s. sites. Monitoring occasionally, with a proximal electrode, the impulse traffic evoked by i.n.m.s. distally in the same fascicle, established that the stimulation procedure could be made selective enough to activate single myelinated fibres in isolation, while also permitting multifibre recruitment. Monitoring propagated impulses also established that i.n.m.s. of a single myelinated fibre supplying a low-threshold mechanoreceptor in the hand might evoke an elementary sensation. Such sensations were fully endowed with cognitive attributes amenable to psychophysical estimation: quality, magnitude and localized projection. Psychophysical tests were made during i.n.m.s. at intraneural sites where single-unit activity was recorded from classified RA, PC, SA I or SA II mechanoreceptors. Changes in excitability of the nerve fibre of an identified unit, induced by further i.n.m.s., certified that the recorded unit had been stimulated during psychophysical tests. Comparing physical location of the receptive field of a recorded unit and localization of the projected field of the corresponding elementary sensation, revealed that either predicted the other accurately. This further assisted identification of the unit activated by i.n.m.s. The type of a recorded unit and the quality of the elementary sensation evoked by its activation were also reciprocally predictive. RA units evoked intermittent tapping, PC units vibration or tickle and SA I units evoked pressure. SA II units evoked no sensation when activated in isolation. Afferent impulse frequency determined magnitude of pressure in the SA I system, and frequency of vibration in the PC system. In the RA system, stimulation frequency determined frequency of tapping-flutter-vibration sensation at relatively low rates and subjective intensity of sensation at high rates. These findings endorse the concept that quality of sensation is coded in specific sensory systems. Further, they provide novel evidence that sensory quality, magnitude and localization can be exquisitely resolved at cognitive levels on the basis of input initiated in a single mechanoreceptor unit.

Full text

PDF
633

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian E. D., Zotterman Y. The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings: Part 3. Impulses set up by Touch and Pressure. J Physiol. 1926 Aug 6;61(4):465–483. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1926.sp002308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darian-Smith I., Davidson I., Johnson K. O. Peripheral neural representation of spatial dimensions of a textured surface moving across the monkey's finger pad. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:135–146. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Darian-Smith I., Oke L. E. Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:117–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dykes R. W., Rasmusson D. D., Hoeltzell P. B. Organization of primary somatosensory cortex in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;43(6):1527–1546. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.6.1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HENSEL H., BOMAN K. K. Afferent impulses in cutaneous sensory nerves in human subjects. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Sep;23:564–578. doi: 10.1152/jn.1960.23.5.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagbarth K. E., Hongell A., Hallin R. G., Torebjörk H. E. Afferent impulses in median nerve fascicles evoked by tactile stimuli of the human hand. Brain Res. 1970 Dec 18;24(3):423–442. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90183-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrington T., Merzenich M. M. Neural coding in the sense of touch: human sensations of skin indentation compared with the responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innvervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 1970;10(3):251–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00235049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johansson R. S. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:101–125. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:283–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B., Westling G. Thresholds of mechanosensitive afferents in the human hand as measured with von Frey hairs. Brain Res. 1980 Feb 24;184(2):343–351. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90803-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson K. O., Lamb G. D. Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:117–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Järvilehto T., Hämäläinen H., Laurinen P. Characteristics of single mechanoreceptive fibres innervating hairy skin of the human hand. Exp Brain Res. 1976 May 10;25(1):45–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00237325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knibestöl M., Vallbo A. B. Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. J Physiol. 1980 Mar;300:251–267. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Konietzny F., Perl E. R., Trevino D., Light A., Hensel H. Sensory experiences in man evoked by intraneural electrical stimulation of intact cutaneous afferent fibers. Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(2):219–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00236910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MOUNTCASTLE V. B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jul;20(4):408–434. doi: 10.1152/jn.1957.20.4.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merrill E. G., Wall P. D. Factors forming the edge of a receptive field: the presence of relatively ineffective afferent terminals. J Physiol. 1972 Nov;226(3):825–846. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Merzenich M. M., Kaas J. H., Sur M., Lin C. S. Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and 1 in "SI" in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J Comp Neurol. 1978 Sep 1;181(1):41–73. doi: 10.1002/cne.901810104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. POWELL T. P., MOUNTCASTLE V. B. Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1959 Sep;105:133–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parry G. J., Brown M. J. Arachidonate-induced experimental nerve infarction. J Neurol Sci. 1981 Apr;50(1):123–133. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(81)90047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Paul R. L., Merzenich M., Goodman H. Representation of slowly and rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors of the hand in Brodmann's areas 3 and 1 of Macaca mulatta. Brain Res. 1972 Jan 28;36(2):229–249. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90732-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O. Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1192–1203. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O. Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1204–1225. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TASAKI I. Properties of myelinated fibers in frog sciatic nerve and in spinal cord as examined with micro-electrodes. Jpn J Physiol. 1952 Nov;3(1):73–94. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.3.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Talbot W. H., Darian-Smith I., Kornhuber H. H., Mountcastle V. B. The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301–334. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.2.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Torebjörk H. E., Hallin R. G., Hongell A., Hagbarth K. E. Single unit potentials with complex waveform seen in microelectrode recordings from the human median nerve. Brain Res. 1970 Dec 18;24(3):443–450. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90184-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Torebjörk H. E., Ochoa J. L. Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980 Dec;110(4):445–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vallbo A. B., Hagbarth K. E. Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. Exp Neurol. 1968 Jul;21(3):270–289. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vallbo A. B., Hagbarth K. E., Torebjörk H. E., Wallin B. G. Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev. 1979 Oct;59(4):919–957. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.4.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vallbo A. B. Prediction of propagation block on the basis of impulse shape in single unit recordings from human nerves. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Mar;97(1):66–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb10236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vallbo A. B. Sensations evoked from the glabrous skin of the human hand by electrical stimulation of unitary mechanosensitive afferents. Brain Res. 1981 Jun 29;215(1-2):359–363. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90517-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. WALL P. D. Cord cells responding to touch, damage, and temperature of skin. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Mar;23:197–210. doi: 10.1152/jn.1960.23.2.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zealear D. L., Crandall W. F. Stimulating and recording from axons within their myelin sheaths: a stable and nondamaging method for studying single motor units. J Neurosci Methods. 1982 Jan;5(1-2):47–54. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(82)90050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES