Abstract
A monoclonal antibody raised against Haemophilus ducreyi was tested for its sensitivity and specificity as an immunofluorescence (IF) reagent using simulated vaginal smears containing H. ducreyi, smears taken from skin lesions of mice infected with H. ducreyi and patients from South Africa, Thailand and Malaysia with clinically diagnosed chancroid. The IF test was more sensitive than culture or Gram staining in the simulated smears, theoretically detecting less than 4 organisms/sample. It detected H. ducreyi in 95% of the animal lesions compared with 14% detected by culture. Immunofluorescence testing identified over 90% of culture-positive cases of chancroid but also detected organisms in some culture-negative cases where clinical evidence for the diagnosis was strong. These results suggest that this antibody may provide a simple, rapid and sensitive means of detecting H. ducreyi in cases of chancroid.
Full text
PDF




Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Botcherby M., Gilchrist C., Bremner J., Byrne M. A., Harris J. R., Taylor-Robinson D. Rapid diagnosis of genital herpes by detecting cells infected with virus in smears with fluorescent monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;40(6):687–689. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.6.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DEACON W. E., ALBRITTON D. C., OLANSKY S., KAPLAN W. V.D.R.L. chancroid studies. I. A simple procedure for the isolation and identification of Hemophilus ducreyi. J Invest Dermatol. 1956 May;26(5):399–406. doi: 10.1038/jid.1956.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen E. J., Loftus T. A. Monoclonal antibodies reactive with all strains of Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect Immun. 1984 Apr;44(1):196–198. doi: 10.1128/iai.44.1.196-198.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolars J. C., Levitt M. D., Aouji M., Savaiano D. A. Yogurt--an autodigesting source of lactose. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jan 5;310(1):1–3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198401053100101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lykke-Olesen L., Larsen L., Pedersen T. G., Gaarslev K. Epidemic of chancroid in Greenland 1977-78. Lancet. 1979 Mar 24;1(8117):654–655. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91091-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nayyar K. C., Stolz E., Michel M. F. Rising incidence of chancroid in Rotterdam. Epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Dec;55(6):439–441. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.6.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nsanze H., Fast M. V., D'Costa L. J., Tukei P., Curran J., Ronald A. Genital ulcers in Kenya. Clinical and laboratory study. Br J Vener Dis. 1981 Dec;57(6):378–381. doi: 10.1136/sti.57.6.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nsanze H., Plummer F. A., Maggwa A. B., Maitha G., Dylewski J., Piot P., Ronald A. R. Comparison of media for the primary isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Sex Transm Dis. 1984 Jan-Mar;11(1):6–9. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198401000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajan V. S., Sng E. H., Lim A. L. The isolation of H. ducreyi in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1983 Jan;12(1):57–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schalla W. O., Sanders L. L., Schmid G. P., Tam M. R., Morse S. A. Use of dot-immunobinding and immunofluorescence assays to investigate clinically suspected cases of chancroid. J Infect Dis. 1986 May;153(5):879–887. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.5.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmid G. P., Sanders L. L., Jr, Blount J. H., Alexander E. R. Chancroid in the United States. Reestablishment of an old disease. JAMA. 1987 Dec 11;258(22):3265–3268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor D. N., Duangmani C., Suvongse C., O'Connor R., Pitarangsi C., Panikabutra K., Echeverria P. The role of Haemophilus ducreyi in penile ulcers in Bangkok, Thailand. Sex Transm Dis. 1984 Jul-Sep;11(3):148–151. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198407000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]