Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2025 Mar 26;639(8056):897–901. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5

Witnessing the onset of reionization through Lyman-α emission at redshift 13

Joris Witstok 1,2,3,4,, Peter Jakobsen 3,4, Roberto Maiolino 1,2,5, Jakob M Helton 6, Benjamin D Johnson 7, Brant E Robertson 8, Sandro Tacchella 1,2, Alex J Cameron 9, Renske Smit 10, Andrew J Bunker 9, Aayush Saxena 5,9, Fengwu Sun 6,7, Stacey Alberts 6, Santiago Arribas 11, William M Baker 1,2, Rachana Bhatawdekar 12, Kristan Boyett 9, Phillip A Cargile 7, Stefano Carniani 13, Stéphane Charlot 14, Jacopo Chevallard 9, Mirko Curti 15, Emma Curtis-Lake 16, Francesco D’Eugenio 1,2,17, Daniel J Eisenstein 7, Kevin N Hainline 6, Gareth C Jones 1,2,9, Nimisha Kumari 18, Michael V Maseda 19, Pablo G Pérez-González 11, Pierluigi Rinaldi 6, Jan Scholtz 1,2, Hannah Übler 1,2,20, Christina C Williams 21, Christopher N A Willmer 6, Chris Willott 22, Yongda Zhu 6
PMCID: PMC11946913  PMID: 40140594

Abstract

Cosmic reionization began when ultraviolet (UV) radiation produced in the first galaxies began illuminating the cold, neutral gas that filled the primordial Universe1,2. Recent James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations have shown that surprisingly UV-bright galaxies were in place beyond redshift z = 14, when the Universe was less than 300 Myr old35. Smooth turnovers of their UV continua have been interpreted as damping-wing absorption of Lyman-α (Ly-α), the principal hydrogen transition69. However, spectral signatures encoding crucial properties of these sources, such as their emergent radiation field, largely remain elusive. Here we report spectroscopy from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES10) of a galaxy at redshift z = 13.0 that reveals a singular, bright emission line unambiguously identified as Ly-α, as well as a smooth turnover. We observe an equivalent width of EWLy-α > 40 Å (rest frame), previously only seen at z < 9 where the intervening intergalactic medium becomes increasingly ionized11. Together with an extremely blue UV continuum, the unexpected Ly-α emission indicates that the galaxy is a prolific producer and leaker of ionizing photons. This suggests that massive, hot stars or an active galactic nucleus have created an early reionized region to prevent complete extinction of Ly-α, thus shedding new light on the nature of the earliest galaxies and the onset of reionization only 330 Myr after the Big Bang.

Subject terms: Galaxies and clusters, Early universe, Cosmology


Spectroscopy from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey of a galaxy at redshift 13 shows a singular, bright emission line identified as Lyman-α, suggesting the onset of reionization only 330 Myr after the Big Bang.

Main

Using the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam12) and Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI13) aboard the JWST, we obtained deep imaging as part of the JADES and JADES Origins Field (JOF)14 programmes. A careful search for high-redshift galaxy candidates exploiting the 14-band NIRCam coverage15,16 led to the identification of JADES-GS+53.06475-27.89024 (JADES-GS-z13-1-LA hereafter) as the most robust redshift z ≳ 11.5 photometric candidate in the JOF based on its blue colour and clear ‘dropout’ signature, confidently rejecting a brown dwarf solution. Because the discontinuity strength (>20× in flux between the NIRCam F150W and F200W filters) further rules out a Balmer break resulting from an evolved stellar population at much lower redshift, the photometry strongly favours a solution at z ≈ 13, at which Ly-α, the 2p → 1s electronic transition of hydrogen, is shifted to 1.7 μm in the observed frame and any photons emitted at shorter wavelengths are completely absorbed by neutral hydrogen (H i) in the intervening intergalactic medium (IGM).

Follow-up spectroscopy of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA was obtained as part of JADES with the JWST Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec)17, principally in PRISM mode (exposure time of 18.7 h), covering wavelengths from 0.6 μm up to 5.3 μm at low resolution (R ≈ 100). As shown in Fig. 1, the resulting spectrum unequivocally confirms the redshift to be z ≈ 13.0 (Methods), even if the break is smooth rather than sharp, which indeed is expected for sources embedded in a highly neutral IGM owing to Ly-α damping-wing absorption18, as has been seen directly in quasar spectra19. Spectra of z ≳ 9 galaxies recently discovered by the JWST have also hinted at the existence of IGM damping wings3,7, although many cases have been observed to far exceed pure IGM absorption, which has been ascribed to local damped Ly-α (DLA) absorbing systems (column densities NHi > 1020.3 cm−2; ref. 20) interpreted as pockets of dense, neutral gas within or near the galaxy6,8,9,21.

Fig. 1. NIRCam and NIRSpec/PRISM observations of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA.

Fig. 1

a, Two-dimensional SNR map of the PRISM spectrum (not used for extraction of the one-dimensional spectrum; see Methods for details). b, One-dimensional sigma-clipped PRISM spectrum (uncorrected for further path losses; see Methods) and photometric measurements (slightly offset in wavelength for visualization) according to the legend at the bottom right. Synthetic photometry is obtained by convolving the spectrum with the filter transmission curves shown at the bottom. Shading and error bars represent 1σ uncertainty. c, Zoom-in on the emission line at 1.7 μm, which falls precisely between the F162M and F182M medium-band filters. d, False-colour image of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA constructed by stacking NIRCam filters for each colour channel as annotated. The placement of the NIRSpec microshutters, nearly identical across the two visits, is shown in grey, as is the circular 0.3″-diameter extraction aperture for the CIRC2 photometry. A physical scale of 1 kpc (0.28″ at z = 13.05) is indicated as the scale bar.

Notably, unlike any other z > 10 galaxies confirmed by the JWST36,2224, the PRISM spectrum also reveals a bright emission line detected at high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR = 6.4) and consistently across the two independent visits (Methods). Located at the blue edge of the spectral break, it is observed at λobs = 1.7084 ± 0.0014 μm and, although the continuum directly underneath is not detected, we can conservatively place a lower limit on the rest-frame EW of >40 Å. The only viable explanation, considering the clear break and the absence of nearby foreground sources and any other lines (Methods), is to identify the line as Ly-α at a redshift of zLy-α = 13.05 ± 0.01. However, owing to the resonant nature of Ly-α, we note that the systemic redshift is probably slightly lower.

If not arising from collisional excitation, expected to be subdominant even at interstellar medium (ISM) densities of n ≈ 104 cm−3 (ref. 25), this immediately implies that JADES-GS-z13-1-LA produces a substantial number of ionizing Lyman continuum (LyC) photons as quantified by the production efficiency, for which we find a robust lower limit of ξion ≳ 1025.1 Hz erg−1 (Methods). Although already close to the canonical value required for star-forming galaxies to complete reionization26, this value increases considerably if any Ly-α photons are absorbed within the galaxy or scattered out of our line of sight in the IGM. This should be a notable effect at z = 13, as the Universe is still highly neutral7,19, even if a local ionized ‘bubble’ around the galaxy facilitates the transmission of Ly-α photons11. Note that, although photon diffusion by means of resonant scattering off neutral gas in the IGM is predicted to result in extended Ly-α halos around galaxies before reionization27, such diffuse emission cannot explain the observed line properties. From non-detections in our medium-resolution spectra, although less sensitive than the PRISM, we do however infer that the line is probably broadened spectrally (Methods).

Fitting a variety of standard stellar population synthesis (SPS) models to the observed spectral energy distribution (SED) of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA yields a young (10–20 Myr) and metal-poor (<2% Solar) stellar population, with little to no dust obscuration (Supplementary information). However, commonly used SED fitting codes do not have the capability to model the peculiar coexistence of Ly-α emission together with a smooth spectral turnover. To better understand its origin in JADES-GS-z13-1-LA, we therefore performed detailed spectral modelling in which we take into account potential absorption by DLA absorbers, transmission through a neutral, mean-density IGM with a local ionized bubble and instrumental effects such as path losses and the line spread function. For our fiducial model, we opt for a power-law continuum that offers the flexibility to recreate the steep UV slope, which from the NIRCam and NIRSpec data we consistently measure to be βUV ≲ −2.7 (Methods). However, we also considered the inclusion of nebular continuum, as the two-photon (2γ) continuum in lower-redshift galaxies has been suggested28,29 as the potential origin of a UV turnover and Ly-α emission qualitatively similar to JADES-GS-z13-1-LA. Best-fitting models with a pure power-law and 2γ continuum are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Model of NIRSpec/PRISM observations of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA.

Fig. 2

a, Model curves for the IGM and DLA transmission T (according to the legend on the right) and normalized Ly-α line profiles (see panel c). b, Blue line shows the sigma-clipped PRISM spectrum corrected for path losses (Methods). Model spectra with a power-law continuum, attenuated by DLA absorption, and a pure 2γ continuum are shown by the solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The legend shows their χ2 goodness-of-fit statistics compared with the degrees of freedom (DOF; Methods). The intrinsic and observed Ly-α EWs (relative to an unattenuated power-law continuum) and their ratio (the escape fraction) are annotated. c, Zoom-in on the intrinsic (dotted black line) and IGM-transmitted (solid black line) Ly-α line profiles. The vertical black dotted line shows the median systemic Ly-α redshift in the default model (Methods), differing from the Ly-α redshift by the observed velocity offset ΔvLy-α,obs. d, For the two different models, χ represents the residuals normalized by the observational uncertainty of a single wavelength bin (diagonal elements of the covariance matrix). The location of other rest-frame UV lines are indicated, although none are significantly detected (Methods). Shading represents 1σ uncertainty on all lines.

Regardless of the choice of continuum, our model indicates that, across a range of reasonable emergent Ly-α profiles, approximately 5–10% of flux may be transmitted through the IGM, implying an intrinsic Ly-α luminosity of LLy-α ≈ 3 × 1043 erg s−1. Here we allow for a non-zero LyC escape fraction causing a local ionized bubble with radius Rion ≈ 0.2 physical Mpc (pMpc) to form within an otherwise neutral IGM, without which the required luminosity would triple, a scenario disfavoured by the non-detection in the MIRI/F770W filter containing Hβ (Methods). Still, we find that the models consistently require ξion ≈ 1026.5 Hz erg−1, to either create the transmission-enhancing bubble or boost the intrinsic luminosity. For any appreciable IGM transmission, the observed Ly-α peak should fall substantially redwards (ΔvLy-α,obs ≳ 500 km s−1) of the systemic redshift22,30, which we therefore infer to be zsys=13.010.01+0.02.

For standard stellar models, the remarkably high ξion is untenable31,32 under common initial mass functions (IMFs). Because ξion is directly sensitive to the hottest stars, its extreme value may be ascribed to an extension of the IMF to very massive stars33,34. The high average ionizing-photon energy of a T = 105 K blackbody moreover yields a two times higher ratio of Ly-α to LyC photons than standard case B recombination25, thereby bringing the true ξion more closely in agreement with the theoretical stellar maximum35. One particularly intriguing class of objects predicted to radiate up to 40% of their bolometric luminosity as Ly-α are entirely metal-free Population iii (Pop iii) stars3638 thought to reach substantially higher masses and effective temperatures than subsequent metal-enriched stellar populations. However, the absolute UV magnitude of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA, MUV ≈ −18.7 mag, would require a stellar mass of M* ≈ 106M as a pure Pop iii system, slightly higher than typical predictions39. Furthermore, the absence of strong He iiλ 1,640 Å emission (Methods) may argue against the Pop iii scenario40, although its strength rapidly evolves several million years after a star-formation burst37,38.

The presence of extraordinarily hot stars (Teff > 105 K) required to explain such high ξion could naturally lead relatively low-density gas (n ≲ 104 cm−3) to emit a prominent nebular continuum with a UV turnover29,41. However, we find that, compared with the pure 2γ continuum, which only becomes further reddened by free-bound continuum emission at higher densities, the current data are better reproduced by a steep power law (Fig. 2). A scenario in which Ly-α emission is produced together with 2γ continuum as cooling radiation by means of collisional excitation in the dense core of a collapsing cloud42 is therefore also disfavoured. The extremely blue UV continuum (βUV ≲ −2.7) consistently leads our models to prefer near-unity LyC escape fraction to reproduce the blue SED of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA, even with an IMF extending to 300 M (Methods). Moreover, recent stellar models show43 that the effective temperatures of very massive stars stagnate beyond 100 M, suggesting that a high LyC escape fraction remains necessary. Although this would corroborate the suggestion that JADES-GS-z13-1-LA is located inside an ionized bubble and could suppress He ii, it still leaves the UV turnover to be explained.

Instead, the spectrum of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA therefore seems to necessitate notable DLA absorption (NHi ≈ 1022.8 cm−2 for the power-law continuum), as seen in several z > 10 galaxies6,8,9,21. If the DLA absorber were co-located with the galaxy, a specific geometry is required to simultaneously accommodate the escape of Ly-α and, potentially, LyC. As illustrated in Fig. 3, an inhomogeneous ISM or an edge-on disk and associated ionization cone may cause DLA absorption in compact continuum sources, which is circumvented by Ly-α emission44. Especially in the absence of dust, Ly-α emission could escape through resonant scattering while also becoming broadened in velocity space, consistent with observations. Empirically, Ly-α emission superimposed on DLA absorption has not only been reported for nearby UV-bright star-forming galaxies in which it has been interpreted as a sign of ISM inhomogeneity45 but also in the case of active galactic nuclei46.

Fig. 3. Schematic of production, escape and absorption of Ly-α in JADES-GS-z13-1-LA.

Fig. 3

a,b, Ly-α emission is indicated in pink, whereas dark blue shows H i gas. We identify two potential explanations each for the source of emission ((i) and (ii)) and modes of Ly-α modulation. a, An extended disk of neutral gas seen in edge-on orientation may cause DLA absorption of the continuum source, whereas an ionization cone perpendicular to the disk plane allows Ly-α photons to escape. Under this escape mechanism, the source of the Ly-α emission may be interchanged from an AGN (i) to a nuclear starburst (ii). b, Alternatively, if neutral gas in the ISM is inhomogeneously distributed, resonant scattering could allow Ly-α to diffuse outwards while the central source remains obscured by H i gas, as seen in local, compact, star-forming galaxies (see text for details).

Indeed, an accreting supermassive black hole may offer a comprehensive alternative explanation for the observed properties of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA. Effectively unresolved by NIRCam, its half-light radius of ≲35 pc (Methods) is smaller than most z > 10 galaxies3,5,22,23. Active galactic nuclei have been observed47 to reach UV slopes much steeper than the standard thin-disk model48 with βUV = −7/3 ≈ −2.33, as expected for a truncated accretion disk. They are also found49 to have high LyC escape fractions and the broad Ly-α line could be linked to active galactic nucleus-driven outflows or a broad line region. Constraints on the at present undetected He ii and other UV lines (Methods) are consistent with model predictions for metal-poor active galactic nuclei40, altogether making JADES-GS-z13-1-LA a viable candidate.

Whether the Ly-α emission of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA originates in stars or a supermassive black hole, it reveals the rather extreme character of one of the earliest galaxies known, despite having been found in a modest survey area16 examining a comoving volume of 50,000 Mpc3 between z = 11 and z = 15. At only 330 Myr after the Big Bang, the probable presence of a reionized region around this relatively UV-faint source readily constrains the timeline of cosmic reionization, favouring an early and gradual process driven (initially) by low-mass galaxies50. Furthermore, it provides tangible evidence for the Wouthuysen–Field coupling of the spin temperature of neutral hydrogen to that of the gas by means of the emission of Ly-α photons, the global evolution of which is anticipated to be uncovered soon by H i 21-cm experiments51 to provide a complementary view of cosmic dawn.

Methods

Cosmology and conventions

A flat ΛCDM cosmology is used throughout based on the latest results of the Planck Collaboration52, with H0 = 67.4 km s−1 Mpc−1, Ωm = 0.315 and Ωb = 0.0492. The cosmic hydrogen fraction is fixed to fH = 0.76. At z = 13, the Hubble flow is H(z = 13) ≈ 1,990 km s−1 Mpc−1 and on-sky separations of 1″ and 1′ correspond to 3.53 physical kpc and 0.212 pMpc, respectively. We quote magnitudes in the AB system53, emission-line wavelengths in vacuum and EWs in the rest frame unless explicitly mentioned otherwise.

NIRCam observations and target selection

In the following sections, we describe the main JWST and auxiliary Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations underlying this work. We refer to refs. 16,54 for details on the NIRCam and MIRI imaging, respectively, whereas ref. 5 provides a detailed description of the NIRSpec spectroscopy. Further details on the JADES survey strategy and data reduction are discussed in the survey overview paper10 and the data release papers5557.

The NIRCam12, MIRI13 and NIRSpec17,58 measurements presented in this work are associated with JWST Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) programme IDs (PIDs) 1180 (PI: Eisenstein), 1210, 1286 and 1287 (PI: Luetzgendorf), further complemented with the JOF programme14 (PID 3215; PIs: Eisenstein and Maiolino). Also, because the JOF itself is located within the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey South (GOODS-S59) extragalactic legacy field, HST Legacy Field imaging60 is publicly available, covering 0.4 μm to 1.8 μm between the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) and Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3).

Further MIRI imaging in the F770W filter was obtained54 as coordinated parallel observations to JADES NIRCam observations (PID 1180). Several high-redshift targets, selected by refs. 15,16 based on the NIRCam images in the JOF, including JADES-GS-z13-1-LA (located at right ascension of +53.06475° and declination of −27.89024°), were followed up using the NIRSpec Micro-Shutter Assembly (MSA61) as part of PID 1287, scheduled between 10 and 12 January 2024.

NIRSpec observations and data reduction

The NIRSpec observations spanned three consecutive visits. However, during visit 2, the lock on the guide star was lost, preventing it from being carried out nominally. Although different MSA configurations were used across visits, JADES-GS-z13-1-LA was observed in both visits 1 and 3 in the PRISM/CLEAR grating-filter combination (simply ‘PRISM’ hereafter) with resolving power of 30 ≲ R ≲ 300 between wavelengths of 0.6 μm and 5.3 μm, as well as in the medium-resolution grating-filter combinations G140M/F070LP, G235M/F170LP and G395M/F290LP (‘R1000 gratings’), each with resolving power R ≈ 1,000. A sequence of exposures following three nod positions was repeated four times for each visit in PRISM mode and once for each of the R1000 gratings. Each nod sequence had an exposure time of 8,403.2 s, consisting of six integrations made up of 19 groups in NRSIRS2 readout mode62. Altogether, JADES-GS-z13-1-LA was observed for 67,225.6 s by the NIRSpec/PRISM and 16,806.4 s in each of the R1000 gratings.

We used version 3.1 of the data-reduction pipeline developed by the ESA NIRSpec Science Operations Team61 and the NIRSpec GTO team (simply ‘pipeline’ hereafter), which produces flux-calibrated spectra largely following the algorithms used in the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) pipeline. We refer to previous works3,5,56,57 for detailed descriptions of the NIRSpec data-reduction pipeline, an overview of which is given in ref. 61. In brief, three adjacent microshutters were opened to obtain background-subtracted spectra of individual sources, for which the subtraction follows a three-point nodding scheme discussed above. Initial path-loss corrections were calculated under the assumption of a point-source light profile placed at the same intra-shutter location of the source. The PRISM spectra take up an irregular wavelength grid with sampling such that the wavelength-dependent line spread function17 always spans a fixed number of wavelength bins. Our fiducial (‘sigma-clipped’) spectrum combines all available sub-exposures in the three nodding positions, for which one-dimensional spectra are extracted over the central three spatial pixels (corresponding to 0.3″), through a custom sigma-clipping algorithm (see Supplementary information for details).

Photometric measurements

We obtained photometric measurements of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA using two methods. Our fiducial photometry is determined using ForcePho (B.D.J. et al., manuscript in preparation) on all 14 available NIRCam filters (see also ref. 16), whereas MIRI/F770W follows a customized procedure following J.M.H. et al. (manuscript in preparation), both discussed in more detail below. An alternative approach to ForcePho is to measure fluxes in circular apertures with a diameter of 0.3″ (‘CIRC2’). These results are summarized in Extended Data Table 1. We include CIRC2 photometry in the available HST bands, which, together with NIRCam filters up to and including F150W, are statistically fully consistent with non-detections (χ2 = 11.6 over ten filters, that is, P = 0.31).

Extended Data Table 1.

Photometry and UV-continuum properties of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA

graphic file with name 41586_2025_8779_Tab1_ESM.jpg

Reported quantities (and corresponding 1σ uncertainties) are the flux density Fν in nJy, the UV magnitude (MUV) in magnitudes, the bolometric luminosity (Lbol) in 1010 Solar luminosity and UV slopes taking into account all available filters redwards of 2 μm (βUV) or only up to and including F335M (β^UV). Fluxes in available HST and JWST filters are measured with ForcePho and within circular 0.3-diameter apertures (CIRC2), except for MIRI/F770W, as detailed in ‘Photometric measurements’. Synthetic photometry in NIRCam filters is directly extracted from the NIRSpec/PRISM spectrum (see Supplementary information). For each of the three different sets of photometry, UV properties (Lbol, MUV and βUV) are measured redwards of λobs = 2.0 μm, corresponding to rest-frame wavelengths λemit ≳ 1,500 Å at z = 13 (see Supplementary information for details). The uncertainty on the UV magnitude (MUV) takes into account a systematic uncertainty of Δz = 0.05.

Given that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the MIRI/F770W point spread function (PSF) is much larger than those of NIRCam54, we considered the F444W–F770W colour of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA after convolving the F444W mosaic with the F770W PSF and rebinning to the F770W pixel size. We measured this colour assuming a circular aperture with 0.7″ diameter (‘CIRC5’), which roughly corresponds to the 65% encircled energy of F770W, before applying aperture corrections. The reported MIRI/F770W flux is then inferred from the difference between the total CIRC5 NIRCam/F444W flux and the F444W–F770W colour. Using this approach, we are taking advantage of the higher spatial resolution afforded by NIRCam compared with MIRI. However, this measurement does not yield a significant detection (Fν = 1.60 ± 2.23 nJy). Neglecting contributions from the [O iii] λ 4,960, 5,008 Å lines and underlying continuum, the MIRI non-detection would be consistent with an Hβ flux of FHβ ≲ 6.7 × 10−19 erg s−1 cm−2 (3σ), translating to an intrinsic Ly-α flux of FLy-α ≲ 1.6 × 10−17 erg s−1 cm−2 (case B recombination; for example, ref. 11).

To explore the morphology of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA, we first fitted Sérsic63 profiles separately to the various available NIRCam filters (using the mosaic images) using the pysersic code64. We do not find a strong wavelength dependency of the morphology. In the F277W filter, which explores rest-frame wavelengths around λemit ≈ 2,000 Å at z = 13, we constrain JADES-GS-z13-1-LA to have a half-light radius of 17.51.7+3.0mas and a Sérsic63 index consistent with n = 1. This size approaches half the pixel size (that is, 15 mas) and should hence be treated as an upper limit, given that the mosaicing procedure probably introduces artificial smoothing.

To fit to independent dithered NIRCam exposures, we performed further modelling with ForcePho (B.D.J. et al., manuscript in preparation), assuming a model with a single intrinsic Sérsic63 profile and freely varying normalization in each filter (for example, refs. 6567). Notably, by fitting to the individual exposures, ForcePho avoids correlated noise between pixels in drizzled mosaic images, enabling us to investigate scales smaller than individual pixels. The results are shown in Extended Data Fig. 1 and the resulting photometry is listed in Extended Data Table 1. From this analysis, we find a formal upper limit (84th percentile) on the half-light radius of 5.1 mas. We therefore conclude that the imaging data are consistent with the continuum source being unresolved. On the basis of tests with similarly faint brown dwarf stars that allow the expected systematic uncertainties to be quantified, we conservatively use an upper limit on the half-light radius as reported in ref. 16 for the F200W filter, ≲10 mas or 35 pc.

Extended Data Fig. 1. ForcePho modelling of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA.

Extended Data Fig. 1

The top row shows roughly 1″ × 1″ cutouts of the observed data (scaled according to the colour bar shown on the right) around JADES-GS-z13-1-LA in each of the 14 available NIRCam filters, as annotated at the top of each column. The PSF-convolved ForcePho model (see ‘Photometric measurements’) is shown in the middle row. The bottom row shows that residuals between data and model are consistent with pure noise, indicating that the model provides a good fit to the data. Note that, although the ForcePho fits are performed on more than 400 separate exposures, they are mosaiced together here to visualize the data and residuals.

Emission-line properties

The emission line at 1.71 μm is clearly and consistently detected across different PRISM data reductions, even when only one of the two individual visits is considered (Supplementary information). We first fit a Gaussian profile to the sigma-clipped spectrum using the corresponding covariance matrix (Supplementary information), which provides a good fit to the data: χ2 = 5.97 with five degrees of freedom. We obtain a centroid of 1.7084 ± 0.0014 μm and FWHM = 302 ± 18 Å (or Δv ≈ 5,000 km s−1) that spans 2.4 wavelength bins (120 Å wide at 1.71 μm). We conclude that the line is probably unresolved in the PRISM spectrum and, as expected for compact sources observed with the NIRSpec MSA68, that the spectral resolution is enhanced by a factor of approximately 1.5× compared with the resolution curve predicted for a uniformly illuminated microshutter.

To measure the absolute flux of the line, we first applied a correction to both the sigma-clipped spectrum and the covariance matrix based on the linear ForcePho fit found in our path-loss analysis (Supplementary information) to account for further path losses in the NIRSpec measurements. Directly integrating the corrected PRISM spectrum across the four wavelength bins between 1.69 μm and 1.73 μm (each bin with SNR > 1; Supplementary Information), we find a flux of F = 7.42 ± 1.16 × 10−19 erg s−1 cm−2 (that is, the line is detected at SNR = 6.4). We have verified that all different data reductions (see Supplementary information) yield measurements consistent within 1σ. Specifically, the two visits independently confirm the line detection with measured fluxes of 5.77 ± 1.36 × 10−19 erg s−1 cm−2 and 9.07 ± 1.80 × 10−19 erg s−1 cm−2, respectively.

The emission line is not detected in the medium-resolution G140M/F070LP or G235M/F170LP spectra, both of which cover 1.71 μm, as shown in Extended Data Fig. 2 (although we note that the G235M/F170LP transmission drops below 1.7 μm; ref. 17). To quantify whether this is expected, taking into account their inherently lower sensitivity and relatively short exposure times compared with the PRISM spectra (NIRSpec observations and data reduction), we tested whether the observed R1000 spectra are consistent with the line flux measured in the PRISM spectra. Indeed, we find that, if the observed line profile is sufficiently broadened (FWHM ≳ 600 km s−1, that is, well resolved at R = 1,000 resolution), it would be below the current sensitivity (≲2σ detection expected; Extended Data Fig. 2).

Extended Data Fig. 2. Medium-resolution (R1000) grating spectra of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA.

Extended Data Fig. 2

a, Coloured lines represent observed spectra in different grating-filter modes, as obtained from the sigma-clipping procedure (Supplementary information). Specifically, we show the G140M/F070LP (dotted turquoise line) and G235M/F170LP (dashed range line) spectra compared with the low-resolution PRISM spectrum (dark blue line). Shading represents a 1σ uncertainty on all components of the figure. Solid curves represent emission-line profiles at increasing widths (according to the colour bar in panel b), starting from the R = 1,000 resolution limit and having matched the flux and central wavelength (1.708 μm; indicated by a vertical black line) to the values measured from the PRISM spectrum (see ‘Emission-line properties’). b, Measured Ly-α flux in an increasingly wide spectral aperture centred on 1.708 μm in G235M/F170LP are shown by circles with 1σ error bars, none of which show a significant detection. This is consistent with the less sensitive G140M/F070LP measurements (not shown here for clarity). A horizontal dashed line shows the measured PRISM line flux contained within the FWHM of a Gaussian profile (76%), whereas a vertical dotted line indicates the limiting R = 1,000 resolution. This illustrates that, if the emission line is well resolved (FWHM ≳ 600 km s−1), it would fall below the nominal noise level of the R1000 gratings (see annotated 2σ and 4σ levels).

As discussed further in the Supplementary information, we find it highly unlikely that the emission line at 1.71 μm is because of contamination of the microshutter by a foreground source that is aligned with JADES-GS-z13-1-LA by chance and remains undetected in the continuum, given that the continuum emission of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA unambiguously places the source at z ≈ 13. We have performed the ‘redshift sweep’ analysis detailed in the appendices of refs. 5,9, in which the inferred one-sided P-value for a set of different emission lines is combined to yield the statistical significance of a potential spectroscopic confirmation at a given redshift. The effectiveness of this method is illustrated by the case of JADES-GS-z14-0, for which the most probable redshift was revealed5 to be z = 14.178 (combined P = 0.0072), mainly based on a 3.6σ detection of C iii]. This redshift, consistent within the uncertainty determined from fitting the Ly-α break profile with DLA absorption, was later independently confirmed through the detection21,69 of the [O iii] 88 μm emission line by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). In the case of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA, the redshift sweep was performed across a range of Δz = 0.2 centred on z = 13.0, which, however, did not show any significant line detections.

Upper limits on the flux and EW for other, undetected, lines at z = 13 are therefore determined from integrating the covariance matrix across three PRISM wavelength bins, taking into account any residual flux after having subtracted a power-law model continuum (see ‘Spectral modelling’). The resulting limits, summarized in Extended Data Table 2, are consistent with findings on most other z > 10 galaxies observed by the JWST, which have generally revealed these lines to be relatively weak3,4,6,23,24.

Extended Data Table 2.

Emission-line constraints for JADES-GS-z13-1-LA

graphic file with name 41586_2025_8779_Tab2_ESM.jpg

Presented quantities for each line are the flux and EW from the PRISM spectra. Constraints for undetected lines are presented as 3σ upper limits. N iii] refers to the multiplet at 1,750 Å, whereas C iii] is shorthand for [C iii] λ 1,907 Å, C iii] λ 1,909 Å.

*Discussed in more detail in ‘Spectral modelling’.

Spectral modelling

To gain insight into the Ly-α emission and absorption properties of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA, we model the observed spectrum with a simple framework in which Ly-α and continuum emission produced inside the central galaxy are subject to (damping-wing) absorption arising in intervening neutral hydrogen in dense absorbing systems and/or the IGM. We emphasize that the aim of this model is not to be as physically detailed as possible, which would involve performing simulations including three-dimensional radiative transfer coupled to the hydrodynamics of the gas (requiring the relevant feedback processes to be accurately modelled), but rather to constrain the basic physical properties that JADES-GS-z13-1-LA must have to explain the observations.

As we expect the Ly-α line to be redshifted with respect to the systemic redshift of the galaxy (potentially already as Ly-α emerges from the galaxy or otherwise resulting from processing by the neutral IGM70,71) and no other emission lines are detected (see ‘Emission-line properties’), this quantity (zsys) is not precisely known and is a free parameter in this model. To remain agnostic about the nature of the ionizing source and to avoid the intrinsic limitations of standard SPS models in reproducing very blue UV continua (Supplementary information), the continuum emission is modelled as a power law, FλλβUV, by default. This introduces two more free parameters in the model, the UV slope βUV and a normalization (at a rest-frame wavelength of λemit = 1,500 Å).

To reproduce the smooth Ly-α break seen in the continuum, we allow the continuum emission to be affected by DLA absorption parameterized by the neutral hydrogen column density NHi as in refs. 6,9. The Ly-α emission is explicitly not attenuated by this absorption, as this would completely extinguish the line. Because the attenuated continuum tends to zero at the wavelength of Ly-α, we calculate the line EW according to the unattenuated continuum, which is effectively equivalent to measuring the continuum level by means of the photometry. As discussed in the main text, this would require a specific geometrical configuration such that the Ly-α emission is not strongly absorbed. However, Ly-α emission superimposed on DLA troughs has been observed in galaxy spectra, suggesting that these geometries exist45,46. The absorption cross-section of neutral hydrogen is based on the Voigt profile approximation given by in ref. 72, with a quantum-mechanical correction provided in ref. 73. Because we find that the redshift of the foreground DLA system (when freely varied; for example, ref. 74) prefers a solution close to the systemic redshift, zDLA ≈ zsys, for simplicity, we fix zDLA = zsys in the following.

Alternatively, we considered the case in which the observed spectrum is dominated by the 2γ continuum, which has a fixed shape75 and thus only requires one free parameter, the normalization. As a third variant, we considered a combination consisting of a power-law continuum (using the same parameterization as above) and a full nebular emission spectrum, which, as well as the 2γ continuum and the Ly-α line, also contains the free-bound and free-free components. The nebular emission in this case was computed with the PyNeb code76, which, however, requires assuming the gas temperature and density. We opted for T = 20,000 K and n = 100 cm−3, respectively, for which the 2γ continuum is the dominant contributor in the wavelength range considered here77. The choice for this relatively low density is motivated by the fact that the free-bound (and free-free) components mainly contribute at longer wavelengths and would have to be subdominant to reproduce the very steep UV slope. In this multicomponent (‘self-consistent’) model, we tied the continuum normalization to the strength of the Ly-α line, thereby self-consistently scaling the continuum according to the production rate and escape fraction of LyC photons discussed below.

Following refs. 11,78, IGM transmission was calculated with the patchy reionization model presented in ref. 79, integrating along the trajectory of a photon that starts in an ionized bubble of radius Rion located in an otherwise neutral IGM (see also refs. 80,81). Following ref. 79, we assume the gas in the ionized bubble to be highly ionized (residual neutral fraction fixed at xHi = 10−8) and have T = 104 K, whereas the neutral IGM is at T = 1 K. The gas in both media is assumed to be at mean cosmic density (that is, to have n¯H5.25×104cm3 at z = 13) and be at rest with respect to the central source. We fixed the global neutral hydrogen fraction of the IGM (that is, outside the ionized bubble78) to x¯HI=1, motivated by various types of evidence that consistently indicate that, globally, the Universe is still highly neutral well below redshift z = 13 (for example, refs. 82,83).

We self-consistently model the size of the ionized bubble by considering the production rate and escape fraction of hydrogen-ionizing photons of the central galaxy. As in ref. 11, we define ξionN˙ion/Lν,UV, in which N˙ion is the production rate of ionizing photons and Lν,UV is the luminosity density (in units of erg s−1 Hz−1) of the intrinsic continuum of the ionizing source at λemit = 1,500 Å. In the case of the multicomponent model in particular, Lν,UV is taken to be the value of the power-law continuum at 1,500 Å such that ξion reflects the intrinsic value. The rate of ionizing photons leaking from the galaxy at a given production efficiency ξion is modulated by the LyC escape fraction, fesc,LyC. In a given model instance, we therefore begin by deriving the rate of ionizing photons escaping the galaxy using (for example, refs. 26,8486)

N˙ion,esc=fesc,LyCN˙ion=fesc,LyCξionLν,UV. 1

To calculate the bubble radius Rion, we then numerically integrate equation (3) in ref. 80, describing the time evolution of Rion(t) to obey

dRion3dt=3H(z)Rion3+3N˙ion,esc4πn¯HCHIIn¯HαBRion3, 2

thereby taking into account the effect of the expansion of the Universe parameterized by the Hubble parameter H(z) and recombinations within the ionized bubble, for which we assume a clumping factor for ionized gas of CHii = 3 (for example, ref. 87) and case B recombination rate αB at 20,000 K, as given by in ref. 88. The typical recombination timescale at z = 13, (CHIIn¯HαB)1140Myr, indicates that JADES-GS-z13-1-LA as an ionizing source could quickly ionize its surroundings before recombinations are able to restore balance. As illustrated in Extended Data Fig. 4, showing the time evolution of Rion in the default model, the bubble radius can reach Rion ≈ 0.1 pMpc over a timescale of only 1 Myr. We note that, when the supply of LyC photons stops, the residual neutral hydrogen fraction rapidly increases owing to the high density at z = 13 (xHi ≈ 0.01 after 1 Myr), implying that, for an ionized bubble to have a substantial transmission-enhancing effect redwards of the systemic Ly-α wavelength79, it must be actively maintained. Here we integrate until we reach a fiducial age of t = 10 Myr, having verified that changing this assumption has little impact on our findings as a result of the sublinear scaling Rion ∝ t1/3 (in the absence of recombinations and the Hubble flow). We also considered an alternative model identical to the default power-law model but for which we fix Rion = 0 (that is, fesc,LyC = 0).

Extended Data Fig. 4. Modelled ionized bubble size evolution.

Extended Data Fig. 4

The right axis shows the physical radius of the ionized bubble Rion, whose evolution as a function of lookback time t is governed by equation (2). The solid line shows the median among the posterior distribution of the default model and the shading represents 1σ uncertainty (16th to 84th percentile). The dashed line illustrates the Hubble expansion rate if the bubble remains unchanged from t = 0 onwards, showing that this effect has little impact over the timescale relevant to our analysis. The dotted line shows how the neutral hydrogen fraction within the bubble (left axis) would evolve without further ionizing photons.

Finally, we determine the intrinsic Ly-α luminosity resulting from recombinations by considering the number of ionizing photons that are absorbed within the galaxy and reprocessed into Ly-α. Similarly to the above, the effective rate of LyC photons contributing to the recombination rate within the galaxy (N˙rec) follows from the product of the intrinsic production rate N˙ion and absorbed fraction (one minus the escape fraction) of ionizing photons. This is multiplied by the fraction of (case B) recombination events that result in the emission of a Ly-α photon, frec,B (see, for example, ref. 89), to arrive at the emission rate of Ly-α photons and hence the Ly-α luminosity (that is, the emission rate multiplied by the energy of a Ly-α photon),

LLy-α=N˙recfrec,BELy-α=(1fesc,LyC)ξionLν,UVfrec,BELy-α. 3

We used frec,B(T = 20,000 K) = 0.647 based on the prescription in ref. 90, noting that it depends only weakly on temperature91 and that case A would lead to an unaccounted increase in fesc,LyC. Under the very conservative assumptions of no IGM absorption at all and fesc,LyC = 0, equation (3) places a lower limit on the LyC production efficiency through the observed Ly-α luminosity relative to the continuum, yielding ξion ≳ 1025.1 Hz erg−1 (1025.4 Hz erg−1 under case A). The Ly-α line, as it emerges from the galaxy, is modelled as a Gaussian profile with a given velocity dispersion σLy-α, which is shifted in velocity space at a given offset from the systemic redshift, ΔvLy-α,int, and normalized to the Ly-α luminosity derived as described above.

Radiative transfer calculations predict that a wide variety of Ly-α spectral profiles may emerge from galaxies92,93, but galactic outflows typically cause systematically redshifted components94,95, as seen ubiquitously at high redshift70,71,9699. Although the emergent Ly-α spectral profile is fundamentally unknown at z ≳ 7 owing to the asymmetric IGM transmission on the blue side78,79, some clues are given by the non-detection of the line in the R1000 spectra. If the line were unresolved at a resolution of R ≈ 1000, that is FWHM ≲ 300 km s−1, we would have probably seen a marginal detection (Extended Data Fig. 2). Instead, the line profile probably contains a prominent red, broad component to allow for sufficient transmission of Ly-α flux at z = 13 even in the presence of an ionized bubble (Fig. 2). We note that, because of the IGM transmission, the peak of the intrinsic line profile at velocity offset ΔvLy-α,int with respect to systemic redshift effectively gets further redshifted to a velocity offset of ΔvLy-α,obs.

We used the PyMultiNest100 implementation of the multimodal nested-sampling algorithm MultiNest101 to perform a Bayesian fitting routine to the sigma-clipped PRISM spectrum and corresponding covariance matrix (see Supplementary information) from 1.609 μm up to 2.897 μm (127 wavelength bins), or 1,150 Å ≲ λemit ≲ 2,000 Å at z = 13. Before fitting, as in the section ‘Emission-line properties’, we corrected the NIRSpec measurements for further path losses. Meanwhile, the model spectrum is convolved with the PRISM resolution curve predicted for a uniformly illuminated microshutter, enhanced by a factor of 1.5 based on the measured width of the Ly-α line in the PRISM spectrum (see ‘Emission-line properties’). As detailed by Jakobsen et al. (manuscript in preparation), the goodness-of-fit statistic χ2 is calculated as the matrix product

χ2=RTΣ1R, 4

in which Σ−1 is the inverted covariance matrix and the ith element of the vector R is given as the difference between observed flux density in the ith wavelength bin (Fλ,iobs) and the modelled one (Fλ,imodel),

Ri=Fλ,iobsFλ,imodel. 5

The model log-likelihood is calculated assuming that the observed data are normally distributed around the model, =12χ2. All model parameters, prior distributions and resulting best-fitting values are summarized in Extended Data Table 3. The posterior distributions for the default model are shown in Extended Data Fig. 3.

Extended Data Table 3.

Spectral model parameters, prior distributions and best-fitting values

graphic file with name 41586_2025_8779_Tab3_ESM.jpg

Model parameters are the systemic redshift (zsys), DLA neutral hydrogen column density (NHi), power-law continuum normalization (C) and slope (βUV), ionizing-photon production efficiency (ξion) and escape fraction (fesc,LyC), and the peak velocity offset (ΔvLy-α,int) and intrinsic velocity dispersion (σLy-α) of Ly-α line profile emerging from the galaxy. Further reported parameters are the ionized bubble radius (Rion), Ly-α luminosity (LLy-α), Ly-α EW as it emerges from the galaxy (EWLy-α,intr) and as it is observed (that is, after IGM transmission; EWLy-α,obs), Ly-α escape fraction (fesc,Ly-α) and the observed Ly-α velocity offset (ΔvLy-α,obs), which are not freely varied but derived from the main parameters. Best-fitting values (uncertainties) are the median (16th and 84th percentiles) of the posterior distribution under the default (power-law) model, a model with pure two-photon continuum (2γ), a self-consistent model incorporating power-law and nebular-emission components and a power-law model in which Rion = 0 (for details, see ‘Spectral modelling’).

*(Relative to the) power-law continuum only.

Value is fixed in this model.

The 2γ continuum tends to zero approaching the wavelength of Ly-α.

Extended Data Fig. 3. Posterior distributions from spectral modelling of the observed spectrum of JADES-GS-z13-1-LA.

Extended Data Fig. 3

The small panels show inter-dependencies between all eight parameters freely varied in the model (Extended Data Table 3). Furthermore, we include the physical radius of the ionized bubble (Rion) and Ly-α luminosity (LLy-α), which are not independently varied but are instead determined by the other parameters (see ‘Spectral modelling’).

Although the multicomponent self-consistent model has a slightly higher χ2 (171.4) than the default power-law model (χ2 = 168.1), notably, it favours a high LyC escape fraction (fesc,LyC=0.730.26+0.14) to suppress the nebular continuum, much like the SPS model fits (Supplementary information). Indeed, fixing Rion = 0 in the self-consistent model (results not included here) yields a much poorer fit (χ2 = 183.1), as this overpredicts the continuum tied to the strong Ly-α line. Moreover, the intrinsic Ly-α flux required for the Rion = 0 power-law model is discrepant at a 4.5σ level with the MIRI/F770W non-detection (see ‘Photometric measurements’).

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (4.1MB, pdf)

Supplementary Information, including Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary Table 1 and further references.

Peer Review File (3.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Keating, H. Katz, C. Witten, W. McClymont, A. van der Wel, J. Chisholm, D. Berg and M. Ouchi for useful discussions. This work is based on observations made with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/European Space Agency (ESA)/Canadian Space Agency (CSA) JWST. The data were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes at the STScI, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-03127 for the JWST. These observations are associated with programmes 1180, 1210, 1286, 1287 and 3215. J.W., R.M., W.M.B., F.D. and J.S. acknowledge support from the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), by the European Research Council (ERC) through Advanced Grant 695671 ‘QUENCH’ and by the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Frontier Research grant RISEandFALL. J.W. also gratefully acknowledges support from the Cosmic Dawn Center through the DAWN Fellowship. The Cosmic Dawn Center is financed by the Danish National Research Foundation under grant no. 140. B.D.J., B.E.R., F.S., P.A.C., D.J.E., C.N.A.W. and Y.Z. acknowledge support from the JWST/NIRCam contract to the University of Arizona, NAS5-02015. B.E.R. also acknowledges support from JWST Program 3215. S.T. acknowledges support from Royal Society Research Grant G125142. A.J.C., A.J.B., A.S., J.C. and G.C.J. acknowledge support from the ‘FirstGalaxies’ Advanced Grant from the ERC under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 789056). R.S. acknowledges support from a STFC Ernest Rutherford Fellowship (ST/S004831/1). S. Alberts acknowledges support from the JWST MIRI Science Team Lead, grant 80NSSC18K0555 and from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to the University of Arizona. S. Arribas acknowledges grant PID2021-127718NB-I00 financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research (MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). This research is supported in part by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), through project number CE170100013. S. Carniani acknowledges support by the European Union’s HE ERC Starting Grant No. 101040227 ‘WINGS’. E.C.-L. acknowledges the support of an STFC Webb Fellowship (ST/W001438/1). D.J.E. is supported as a Simons Investigator. P.G.P.-G. acknowledges support from grant PID2022-139567NB-I00 financed by Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, FEDER, UE. H.Ü. gratefully acknowledges support by the Isaac Newton Trust and by the Kavli Foundation through a Newton-Kavli Junior Fellowship. H.Ü. also acknowledges funding by the European Union (ERC APEX, 101164796). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The research of C.C.W. is supported by NOIRLab, which is managed by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. This study made use of the Prospero high-performance computing facility at Liverpool John Moores University.

Extended data figures and tables

Author contributions

J.W. and P.J. led the analysis and the writing of the paper, with key contributions from A.J.B., A.J.C., A.S., B.D.J., B.E.R., F.S., J.M.H., M.C., R.M., R.S., S. Carniani and S.T. A.J.B., C.W., F.D., G.C.J., J.C., J.W., K.B., M.C., N.K., P.J., R.M., S. Arribas, S. Carniani and S. Charlot contributed to the development and commissioning of the NIRSpec instrument and the reduction and analysis of the NIRSpec data presented. B.D.J., B.E.R., C.C.W., C.N.A.W., D.J.E., F.S., K.N.H., P.A.C. and S.T. contributed to the development and commissioning of the NIRCam instrument and the reduction and analysis of the NIRCam data presented. J.M.H. and S. Alberts contributed to the reduction and analysis of the MIRI data presented. A.J.B., B.D.J., B.E.R., C.C.W., C.N.A.W., C.W., D.J.E., E.C.-L., F.D., H.Ü., J.C., J.S., K.N.H., M.V.M., P.G.P.-G., P.J. and R.M. contributed to the design and execution of the JADES programme. A.J.B., B.E.R., C.W., D.J.E. and S.T. serve on the JADES Steering Committee. R.B., W.M.B., P.R. and Y.Z. provided comments on the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Michele Trenti and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

The NIRCam data that support the findings of this study are publicly available at https://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/jades. The reduced spectra that support the findings of this study are publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.14714293 (ref. 102).

Code availability

The code used for the spectral modelling fitting routine is available at https://github.com/joriswitstok/lymana_absorption. The Astropy103,104 software suite is publicly available, as is BAGPIPES105, BEAGLE106, CLOUDY107, emcee108, ForcePho109, MultiNest101, PyMultiNest100, PyNeb76, the SciPy library110, its packages NumPy111 and Matplotlib112, and SpectRes113.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5.

References

  • 1.Dayal, P. & Ferrara, A. Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects. Phys. Rep.780, 1–64 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Robertson, B. E. Galaxy formation and reionization: key unknowns and expected breakthroughs by the James Webb Space Telescope. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.60, 121–158 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Curtis-Lake, E. et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of four metal-poor galaxies at z = 10.3–13.2. Nat. Astron.7, 622–632 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arrabal Haro, P. et al. Confirmation and refutation of very luminous galaxies in the early Universe. Nat. Astron.622, 707–711 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carniani, S. et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14. Nat. Astron.633, 318–322 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.D’Eugenio, F. et al. JADES: carbon enrichment 350 Myr after the Big Bang. Astron. Astrophys.689, A152 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hsiao, T. Y.-Y. et al. JWST NIRSpec spectroscopy of the triply lensed z = 10.17 galaxy MACS0647–JD. Astrophys. J.973, 8 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heintz, K. E. et al. Strong damped Lyman-α absorption in young star-forming galaxies at redshifts 9 to 11. Science384, 890–894 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hainline, K. N. et al. Searching for emission lines at z > 11: the role of damped Lyα and hints about the escape of ionizing photons. Astrophys. J.976, 160 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eisenstein, D. J. et al. Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES). Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02465 (2023).
  • 11.Witstok, J. et al. JADES: primaeval Lyman α emitting galaxies reveal early sites of reionization out to redshift z ~ 9. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.536, 27–50 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rieke, M. J. et al. Performance of NIRCam on JWST in flight. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.135, 028001 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rieke, G. H. et al. The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the James Webb Space Telescope, I: introduction. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.127, 584 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eisenstein, D. J. et al. The JADES Origins Field: a new JWST deep field in the JADES second NIRCam data release. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12340 (2023).
  • 15.Hainline, K. N. et al. The cosmos in its infancy: JADES galaxy candidates at z > 8 in GOODS-S and GOODS-N. Astrophys. J.964, 71 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Robertson, B. et al. Earliest galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: luminosity function and cosmic star formation rate density 300 Myr after the Big Bang. Astrophys. J.970, 31 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jakobsen, P. et al. The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities. Astron. Astrophys.661, A80 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miralda-Escudé, J. Reionization of the intergalactic medium and the damping wing of the Gunn-Peterson trough. Astrophys. J.501, 15 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bañados, E. et al. An 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5. Nat. Astron.553, 473–476 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E. & Prochaska, J. X. Damped Lyα systems. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.43, 861–918 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carniani, S. et al. The eventful life of a luminous galaxy at z = 14: metal enrichment, feedback, and low gas fraction? Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20533 (2024).
  • 22.Bunker, A. J. et al. JADES NIRSpec spectroscopy of GN-z11: Lyman-α emission and possible enhanced nitrogen abundance in a z = 10.60 luminous galaxy. Astron. Astrophys.677, A88 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang, B. et al. UNCOVER: illuminating the early universe—JWST/NIRSpec confirmation of z > 12 galaxies. Astrophys. J. Lett.957, L34 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harikane, Y. et al. Pure spectroscopic constraints on UV luminosity functions and cosmic star formation history from 25 galaxies at zspec = 8.61–13.20 confirmed with JWST/NIRSpec. Astrophys. J.960, 56 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raiter, A., Schaerer, D. & Fosbury, R. A. E. Predicted UV properties of very metal-poor starburst galaxies. Astron. Astrophys.523, A64 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Robertson, B. E., Ellis, R. S., Furlanetto, S. R. & Dunlop, J. S. Cosmic reionization and early star-forming galaxies: a joint analysis of new constraints from Planck and the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. Lett.802, L19 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Loeb, A. & Rybicki, G. B. Scattered Lyα radiation around sources before cosmological reionization. Astrophys. J.524, 527 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hall, P. B. et al. A Lyα-only active galactic nucleus from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astron. J.127, 3146 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cameron, A. J. et al. Nebular dominated galaxies: insights into the stellar initial mass function at high redshift. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534, 523–543 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Scholtz, J. et al. GN-z11: the environment of an active galactic nucleus at z = 10.603. New insights into the most distant Lyα detection. Astron. Astrophys.687, A283 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Topping, M. W. et al. Searching for extremely blue UV continuum slopes at z = 7–11 in JWST/NIRCam imaging: implications for stellar metallicity and ionizing photon escape in early galaxies. Astrophys. J.941, 153 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eldridge, J. J. & Stanway, E. R. New insights into the evolution of massive stars and their effects on our understanding of early galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.60, 455–494 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maseda, M. V. et al. Elevated ionizing photon production efficiency in faint high-equivalent-width Lyman-α emitters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, 5120–5130 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vanzella, E. et al. An extremely metal-poor star complex in the reionization era: approaching Population III stars with JWST. Astron. Astrophys.678, A173 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schaerer, D., Guibert, J., Marques-Chaves, R. & Martins, F. Observable and ionizing properties of star-forming galaxies with very massive stars and different initial mass functions. Astron. Astrophys.693, A271 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schaerer, D. On the properties of massive Population III stars and metal-free stellar populations. Astron. Astrophys.382, 28–42 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Katz, H., Kimm, T., Ellis, R. S., Devriendt, J. & Slyz, A. The challenges of identifying Population III stars in the early Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.524, 351–360 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Trussler, J. A. A. et al. On the observability and identification of Population III galaxies with JWST. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525, 5328–5352 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bromm, V. & Yoshida, N. The first galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.49, 373–407 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nakajima, K. & Maiolino, R. Diagnostics for PopIII galaxies and direct collapse black holes in the early universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.513, 5134–5147 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Katz, H. et al. 21 Balmer Jump Street: the nebular continuum at high redshift and implications for the bright galaxy problem, UV continuum slopes, and early stellar populations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03189 (2024).
  • 42.Dijkstra, M. Continuum emission by cooling clouds. Astrophys. J.690, 82 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Martins, F. & Palacios, A. Spectroscopic evolution of very massive stars at Z = 1/2.5 Z. Astron. Astrophys.659, A163 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tacchella, S. et al. Resolving the nature and putative nebular emission of GS9422: an obscured AGN without exotic stars. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02194 (2024).
  • 45.Hu, W. et al. CLASSY VII Lyα profiles: the structure and kinematics of neutral gas and implications for LyC escape in reionization-era analogs. Astrophys. J.956, 39 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu, S. et al. Discovery of a damped Ly α absorber in the circumnuclear zone of the FeLoBAL quasar SDSS J083942.11+380526.3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.532, 4703–4721 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tang, J.-J. et al. Rapid black hole growth at the dawn of the Universe: a super-Eddington quasar at z = 6.6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.484, 2575–2586 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astron. Astrophys.24, 337–355 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grazian, A. et al. The contribution of faint AGNs to the ionizing background at z ~ 4. Astron. Astrophys.613, A44 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Qin, Y. & Wyithe, J. S. B. Reionization morphology and intrinsic velocity offsets allow transmission of Lyman-α emission from JADES-GS-z13-1-LA. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.538, L16–L23 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.de Lera Acedo, E. et al. The REACH radiometer for detecting the 21-cm hydrogen signal from redshift z ≈ 7.5–28. Nat. Astron.6, 984–998 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Planck Collaboration et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Oke, J. B. & Gunn, J. E. Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry. Astrophys. J.266, 713–717 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Helton, J. M. et al. Photometric detection at 7.7 μm of a galaxy beyond redshift 14 with JWST/MIRI. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18462 (2025).
  • 55.Rieke, M. J. et al. JADES initial data release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: revealing the faint infrared sky with deep JWST NIRCam imaging. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.269, 16 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bunker, A. J. et al. JADES NIRSpec initial data release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Redshifts and line fluxes of distant galaxies from the deepest JWST cycle 1 NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys.690, A288 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.D’Eugenio, F. et al. JADES data release 3: NIRSpec/microshutter assembly spectroscopy for 4000 galaxies in the GOODS fields. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 277, 4 (2025).
  • 58.Böker, T. et al. In-orbit performance of the Near-Infrared Spectrograph NIRSpec on the James Webb Space Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.135, 038001 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Giavalisco, M. et al. The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: initial results from optical and near-infrared imaging. Astrophys. J.600, L93 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Illingworth, G. et al. The Hubble Legacy Fields (HLF-GOODS-S) v1.5 data products: combining 2442 orbits of GOODS-S/CDF-S region ACS and WFC3/IR images. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00841 (2017).
  • 61.Ferruit, P. et al. The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. II. Multi-object spectroscopy (MOS). Astron. Astrophys.661, A81 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rauscher, B. J. et al. Improved reference sampling and subtraction: a technique for reducing the read noise of near-infrared detector systems. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.129, 105003 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sérsic, J. L. Influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy. Bol. Asoc. Argentina Astron.6, 41–43 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pasha, I. & Miller, T. B. pysersic: a Python package for determining galaxy structural properties via Bayesian inference, accelerated with jax. J. Open Source Softw.8, 5703 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Robertson, B. E. et al. Identification and properties of intense star-forming galaxies at redshifts z > 10. Nat. Astron.7, 611–621 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tacchella, S. et al. JADES imaging of GN-z11: revealing the morphology and environment of a luminous galaxy 430 Myr after the Big Bang. Astrophys. J.952, 74 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Baker, W. M. et al. A core in a star-forming disc as evidence of inside-out growth in the early Universe. Nat. Astron.9, 141–154 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.de Graaff, A. et al. Ionised gas kinematics and dynamical masses of z ≳ 6 galaxies from JADES/NIRSpec high-resolution spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys.684, A87 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Schouws, S. et al. Detection of [OIII]88μm in JADES-GS-z14-0 at z=14.1793. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20549 (2024).
  • 70.Tang, M. et al. Lyα emission in galaxies at z ≃ 5–6: new insight from JWST into the statistical distributions of Lyα properties at the end of reionization. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.531, 2701–2730 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tang, M. et al. Lyα emission line profiles of extreme [O iii]- emitting galaxies at z ≳ 2: implications for Lyα visibility in the reionization era. Astrophys. J.972, 56 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tasitsiomi, A. Lyα radiative transfer in cosmological simulations and application to a z ≃ 8 Lyα emitter. Astrophys. J.645, 792 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bach, K., & Lee, H.-W. Accurate Lyα scattering cross-section and red damping wing in the reionization epoch. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.446, 264–273 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Terp, C. et al. Uncovering the physical origin of the prominent Lyman-α emission and absorption in GS9422 at z = 5.943. Astron. Astrophys.690, A70 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Spitzer, L. Jr & Greenstein, J. L. Continuous emission from planetary nebulae. Astrophys. J.114, 407 (1951). [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Luridiana, V., Morisset, C. & Shaw, R. A. PyNeb: a new tool for analyzing emission lines. I. Code description and validation of results. Astron. Astrophys.573, A42 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Schirmer, M. NEBULAR: a simple synthesis code for the hydrogen and helium nebular spectrum. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.128, 114001 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Witstok, J. et al. Inside the bubble: exploring the environments of reionisation-era Lyman-α emitting galaxies with JADES and FRESCO. Astron. Astrophys.682, A40 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mason, C. A. & Gronke, M. Measuring the properties of reionized bubbles with resolved Lyα spectra. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.499, 1395–1405 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cen, R. & Haiman, Z. Quasar Strömgren spheres before cosmological reionization. Astrophys. J.542, L75 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mesinger, A., Haiman, Z. & Cen, R. Probing the reionization history using the spectra of high-redshift sources. Astrophys. J.613, 23 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mason, C. A. et al. Inferences on the timeline of reionization at z ~ 8 from the KMOS Lens-Amplified Spectroscopic Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.485, 3947–3969 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Topping, M. W., Mason, C. & Ellis, R. S. JWST/NIRSpec observations of Lyman α emission in star-forming galaxies at 6.5 ≲ z ≲ 13. Astrophys. J975, 208 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Robertson, B. E. et al. New constraints on cosmic reionization from the 2012 Hubble Ultra Deep Field campaign. Astrophys. J.768, 71 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Finkelstein, S. L. et al. Conditions for reionizing the universe with a low galaxy ionizing photon escape fraction. Astrophys. J.879, 36 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Naidu, R. P. et al. Rapid reionization by the oligarchs: the case for massive, UV-bright, star-forming galaxies with high escape fractions. Astrophys. J.892, 109 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pawlik, A. H., Schaye, J. & van Scherpenzeel, E. Keeping the Universe ionized: photoheating and the clumping factor of the high-redshift intergalactic medium. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.394, 1812–1824 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Draine, B. T. Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).
  • 89.Witstok, J., Puchwein, E., Kulkarni, G., Smit, R. & Haehnelt, M. G. Prospects for observing the low-density cosmic web in Lyman-α emission. Astron. Astrophys.650, A98 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dijkstra, M. Lyα emitting galaxies as a probe of reionisation. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.31, e040 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J. Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (University Science Books, 2005).
  • 92.Gronke, M. & Dijkstra, M. Lyman-alpha spectra from multiphase outflows, and their connection to shell models. Astrophys. J.826, 14 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Blaizot, J. et al. Simulating the diversity of shapes of the Lyman-α line. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.523, 3749–3772 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D. & Maselli, A. 3D Lyα radiation transfer. I. Understanding Lyα line profile morphologies. Astron. Astrophys.460, 397–413 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D., Atek, H. & Tapken, C. 3D Lyα radiation transfer. III. Constraints on gas and stellar properties of z ~ 3 Lyman break galaxies (LBG) and implications for high-z LBGs and Lyα emitters. Astron. Astrophys.491, 89–111 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mason, C. A. The universe is reionizing at z ~ 7: Bayesian inference of the IGM neutral fraction using Lyα emission from galaxies. Astrophys. J.856, 2 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tang, M. et al. Lyman-alpha spectroscopy of extreme [O iii] emitting galaxies at z ≃ 2–3: implications for Lyα visibility and LyC leakage at z > 6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.503, 4105–4117 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Witstok, J. et al. Assessing the sources of reionization: a spectroscopic case study of a 30× lensed galaxy at z ~ 5 with Lyα, C iv, Mg ii, and [Ne iii]. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508, 1686–1700 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Matthee, J. et al. The X-SHOOTER Lyman α survey at z = 2 (XLS-z2) I: what makes a galaxy a Lyman α emitter?. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.505, 1382–1412 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Buchner, J. et al. X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. Astron. Astrophys.564, A125 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. multinest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.398, 1601–1614 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Witstok, J., Jakobsen, P., Carniani, S. & JADES Collaboration. Witnessing the onset of reionisation via Lyman-α emission at redshift 13. Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.14714293 (2025).
  • 103.The Astropy Collaboration et al.Astropy: a community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys.558, A33 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 104.The Astropy Collaboration et al.The Astropy Project: building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package. Astron. J.156, 123 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S. & Davé, R. Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with bagpipes: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.480, 4379–4401 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Chevallard, J. & Charlot, S. Modelling and interpreting spectral energy distributions of galaxies with beagle. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.462, 1415–1443 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ferland, G. J. et al. The 2017 release of Cloudy. Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofís.53, 385–438 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Baldwin, J. O. et al. forcepho: generative modeling galaxy photometry for JWST. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2410.006 (2024).
  • 110.Jones, E., Oliphant, T. & Peterson, P. SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.scipy.org/ (2001).
  • 111.van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C. & Varoquaux, G. The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput. Sci. Eng.13, 22–30 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 90–95 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Carnall, A. C. SpectRes: a fast spectral resampling tool in Python. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05165 (2017).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (4.1MB, pdf)

Supplementary Information, including Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary Table 1 and further references.

Peer Review File (3.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The NIRCam data that support the findings of this study are publicly available at https://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/jades. The reduced spectra that support the findings of this study are publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.14714293 (ref. 102).

The code used for the spectral modelling fitting routine is available at https://github.com/joriswitstok/lymana_absorption. The Astropy103,104 software suite is publicly available, as is BAGPIPES105, BEAGLE106, CLOUDY107, emcee108, ForcePho109, MultiNest101, PyMultiNest100, PyNeb76, the SciPy library110, its packages NumPy111 and Matplotlib112, and SpectRes113.


Articles from Nature are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES