Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79599

A Pathologist’s Dilemma: Placental Site Tumor and Its Differential Diagnosis

Chaimae Daoudi 1,, Anass Haloui 1, Nada Akouh 1, Karich Nassira 1, Amal Bennani 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11947504  PMID: 40151687

Abstract

Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) is a rare neoplasm originating from intermediate trophoblastic cells at the site of placental implantation. Its diagnosis poses significant challenges, particularly in distinguishing it from other gestational trophoblastic tumors, such as epithelioid trophoblastic tumors, choriocarcinoma, and placental site nodules, as well as the benign exaggerated placental site.

We present a case of a 29-year-old woman with persistent gestational trophoblastic disease following a complete hydatidiform mole. A detailed review of the differential diagnoses is provided in tables to aid in the diagnostic process, allowing for a clearer comparison and better understanding of these conditions.

This report highlights the importance of accurately identifying PSTT by eliminating potential differential diagnoses through careful pathological and clinical evaluation. We aim to assist pathologists and clinicians in recognizing this rare condition to ensure timely and appropriate management.

Keywords: choriocarcinoma, cytotrophoblast, epitheloid trophoblastic tumor, exaggerated placental site, implantation site intermediate trophoblast, placental site nodule, placental site trophoblastic tumor, syncytiotrophoblast

Introduction

Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) is a rare neoplasm that constitutes approximately 1-2% of all gestational trophoblastic tumors, with an incidence estimated at one to five cases per 100,000 pregnancies [1,2]. It comprises neoplastic implantation site intermediate trophoblastic cells [3]. Some researchers propose that this tumor originates from neoplastic cytotrophoblastic cells, which subsequently differentiate into the intermediate trophoblastic cells characteristic of the implantation site [4].

First described in 1895, this tumor was initially referred to as “atypical chorioepithelioma.” Over time, its understanding evolved, and it was reclassified under its current terminology to reflect its unique histological and biological characteristics better [3].

PSTTs are distinct from other types of gestational trophoblastic diseases due to their clinical behavior and cellular origins, necessitating specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches [5].

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the clinical, macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical aspects of PSTT and its differential diagnoses, beginning with a case report.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 29-year-old woman (G3P2) diagnosed with a hydatidiform mole in 2021. She underwent two aspirations; pathological results favored a complete hydatidiform mole. Persistent metrorrhagia following aspirations led to a third procedure, which confirmed the diagnosis of a persistent hydatidiform mole.

Initially, the β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level was 145 mIU/mL, and the patient began chemotherapy with methotrexate, which resulted in the negativization of the β-hCG level (3 mIU/mL).

However, one year later, her β-hCG levels began to rise (155 mUI/ml), leading to a fourth aspiration, which was initially misdiagnosed as a pregnancy. However, the pathology results did not show evidence of pregnancy or any signs of a mole.

The patient underwent a pelvic MRI, which was suggestive of persistent trophoblastic disease (Figures 1, 2).

Figure 1. MRI sagittal T1-weighted image showing a globular uterus with a posterior and left lateral corporeal multilocular mass that is poorly defined and hypointense (red arrow).

Figure 1

Figure 2. MRI coronal T2-weighted image showing heterogeneous hyperintensity of the mass (red arrow).

Figure 2

She was then referred to oncology, where she underwent a polychemotherapy protocol (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine (EMA-CO)) consisting of six cycles, with the last cycle administered on December 20, 2023. Subsequent monitoring showed a decrease in β-hCG levels (3.81 mUI/ml), followed by a plateau (5.6-9 mUI/ml).

The follow-up MRI showed near-stability of the lesion process infiltrating the myometrium, consistent with persistent trophoblastic disease, leading to the decision to perform a hysterectomy (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Radiological image revealing the persistence of the lesion process after chemotherapy (red arrow).

Figure 3

Macroscopic examination revealed a whitish lesion at the uterine fundus, with septations and a soft consistency (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Macroscopic view showing a nodular lesion at the uterine fundus.

Figure 4

Histological examination of the samples taken from the lesion revealed a well-defined tumor proliferation composed of intermediate trophoblastic-like cells arranged in clusters, cords, and nests (Figure 5). More peripherally, the cells become isolated, fusiform, and infiltrate between smooth muscle cells (Figure 6). The tumor cells were polygonal with nuclei that were typically round to ovoid, occasionally with irregular contours, and contained vesicular or hyperchromatic chromatin. They were surrounded by abundant cytoplasm that varied between amphophilic and eosinophilic staining.

Figure 5. Histological image showing tumor proliferation arranged in clusters, cords, and nests (hematoxylin-eosin-saffron, x10).

Figure 5

Figure 6. At the periphery, tumor cells infiltrate between the smooth muscle fibers (hematoxylin-eosin-saffron, x20).

Figure 6

Multinucleated cells were occasionally present. The tumor cells frequently wrapped around vascular structures, replacing the vessel wall, and were associated with eosinophilic fibrinoid deposits encircling the vessels (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Tumor cells are polygonal with vesicular nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm, replacing the vascular walls in some areas with the presence of fibrinoid deposits surrounding the vascular structures (hematoxylin-eosin-saffron, x10).

Figure 7

Mitoses were observed at a rate of approximately five per 10 high-power fields (HPF).

An immunohistochemical study showed negative labeling of tumor cells with the anti-P63 antibody. The Ki-67 proliferation index of the tumor was estimated at 10% (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Immunohistochemical images showing the absence of anti-P63 labeling (red arrows) and an estimated tumor proliferation index of 10% (hematoxylin, x40).

Figure 8

The patient is currently under regular monitoring of β-hCG levels, which remain negative to date.

Discussion

PSTT affects women of childbearing age, typically between 32 and 35 years, and usually follows a normal pregnancy, though it can also occur after a molar pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, or ectopic pregnancy [2,3]. It often presents with amenorrhea or abnormal bleeding accompanied by abdominal enlargement, which may lead the patient to believe she is pregnant, as was the case with our patient [3]. The β-hCG level is typically low (<1000 mIU/L) [2,3]. PSTT can be diagnosed even after a few months to 20 years of the most recent pregnancy [6].

Through the clinical history and β-hCG levels, the pathologist can gain an initial orientation that may help in suspecting certain types of trophoblastic tumors while excluding others. Table 1 outlines the different clinical aspects of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

Table 1. Table comparing the clinical presentations of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

GTD: gestational trophoblastic disease; PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumor; ETT: epitheloid trophoblastic tumor; β-hCG: β-human chorionic gonadotropin.

References [3,6].

  PSTT ETT Choriocarcinoma Placental site nodule Exaggerated placental site reaction
Age 20-63 years 15-66 years 29-31 years Childbearing age  
Type of the last known pregnancy or GTD Full-term pregnancy (2/3)/molar pregnancy/spontaneous abortion Full-term pregnancy (67%)/spontaneous abortion/molar pregnancy Hydatidiform mole (50%)/full-term pregnancy Therapeutic abortion/cesarean delivery Normal gestation/molar pregnancy
Latency 12-18 months 1-18 years Weeks to several years 2-108 months  
Clinical presentation History of missed abortion/abnormal uterine bleeding/amenorrhea/uterine enlargement Abnormal uterine bleeding Abnormal uterine bleeding/hemorrhage (at ectopic or metastatic sites) Incidental findings Asymptomatic/abnormal uterine bleeding
Serum β-hCG Mild to moderate (<2000 UI/ml) Mild to moderate (<2000 UI/ml) High (>10000 UI/ml) Normal levels Normal levels

Macroscopically, PSTT appears as a distinct nodular mass, which may sometimes have a polypoid shape [3]. It typically measures between 1 and 10 cm, with a whitish-to-yellowish appearance on the cut surface [5]. In approximately 50% of cases, the mass invades the myometrium, reaches the serosa in 10%, and may occasionally extend to the broad ligament and adnexa [5,3]. Areas of hemorrhage and necrosis are observed in about 50% of cases [5].

Table 2 summarizes the different macroscopic features of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

Table 2. Table comparing the macroscopic characteristics of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumor; ETT: epitheloid trophoblastic tumor; PSN: placental site nodule; APSN: atypical placental site nodule.

References [3,5-9].

  PSTT ETT Choriocarcinoma PSN /APSN Exaggerated placental site reaction
Location Uterine corpus/lower uterine segment. Extrauterine: very rare Uterine corpus/lower uterine segment and cervix (50%)/fallopian tube/ovary/peritoneum Uterus+++. Ectopic and metastatic locations have been reported: fallopian tube, ovary, cervix, lung, liver, kidney, and spleen Uterus+++. Ectopic pregnancy locations (rare) Uterus+++. Ectopic pregnancy locations (rare)
Shape Nodular mass + well-circumscribed Discrete nodular or cystic mass Aggressive mass with an irregular contour No lesion/solitary or multiple lesions No macroscopic lesion
Consistency Solid Solid or cystic Soft and friable - -
Color White to yellow Beige to brown Dark red+++ Yellow, beige -
Size 1-10 cm 0.5-4 cm From microscopic to extensive mass+++ 4-10 mm -
Invasion Deep myometrium (50%)/serosa (10%). Rarely board ligament and adnexa Deep myometrium. Surrounding structures Deep myometrium invasion/uterine perforation Superficial myometrium -
Hemorrhage Focal +++ +++ - -
Necrosis Focal (50%) +++ +++ + -

Gestational trophoblastic tumors differ in their cells of origin. Figure 9 summarizes the histological characteristics of the cells that compose the placenta and provides insight into the origins of various trophoblastic tumors [3,6].

Figure 9. Histological characteristics of placental cells and origins of trophoblastic tumors.

Figure 9

CT: cytotrophoblast; PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumor; ETT: epitheloid trophoblastic tumor.

The histological aspect is the cornerstone for differentiating gestational trophoblastic tumors. Table 3 helps compare the histological features of these tumors and allows for a systematic analysis.

Table 3. Table comparing the microscopic characteristics of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumor; ETT: epitheloid trophoblastic tumor; PSN: placental site nodule; APSN: atypical placental site nodule; IT: intermediate trophoblasts; ST: syncytiotrophoblast; CT: cytotrophoblast; HPF: high-power field.

* Vasculogenic mimicry: choriocarcinoma forms pseudovascular networks and blood lakes lined by trophoblastic cells, communicating with true vessels outside the tumor [3].

References [3,5,6,10].

  PSTT ETT Choriocarcinoma PSN/APSN Exaggerated placental site reaction
Architecture Sheets+++ Nests/cords/masses Compact masses of mononuclear cells surrounded by multinuclear cells Clusters/cords/single cells Cords/small nests
Surrounding tissue Infiltration of endometrium and myometrium Well-circumscribed +/- peripheric focal infiltration Infiltration and destruction Well-circumscribed Infiltration of endometrium and myometrium with preserved architecture
Type of cells Implantation site IT Chorionic-type intermediate trophoblast ST/CT/IT Chorionic-type intermediate trophoblast Implantation site IT
Nuclei Hyperchromatic Irregular contours. Nuclear grooves/pseudo inclusions Small and round/nucleoli+++ Pleomorphic/granular chromatin +/- nucleoli Small and uniform++/+/-large, irregular, hyperchromatic +/-multinucleated cells hyperchromatic + Irregular contours
Cytoplasm Eosinophilic to amphophilic/clear Granular eosinophilic/clear + well-defined cell membranes Mononucleated cells: eosinophilic/clear. Multinucleated cells: markedly eosinophilic Small cells: clear. Large cells: eosinophilic to amphophilic Eosinophilic and abundant
Mitoses 2-4/10 HPF 0-9 mitoses/10 HPF +++ Low mitotic activity in PSN <5 mm. Increased in PSN >5 mm. Absent
Necrosis - +++ +++ - -
Hemorrhage +/-   +++ - -
Vascular features Infiltration of vessel walls with fibrinoid deposition Central blood vessel in tumor nests +/- fibrinoid deposits Vasculogenic mimicry* - infiltration of vessel walls
Calcifications - +++ - - -
Other characteristics - Re-epithelialization of endocervical/endometrial surfaces (specific). Eosinophilic hyaline-like material (resembles keratin). Decidualized stromal cells - Central hyalinized extracellular matrix Chorionic villi are present

The cells of PSTT stain positively for pan-cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), cytokeratin 18, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) (diffuse staining), Mel-CAM (membranous staining), inhibin (focal), CD10, and HSD3B1, consistent with the general profile of trophoblastic cells [5,10]. They are negative for p63 and show diffuse and intense hPL staining, characteristic of the specific profile of implantation site intermediate trophoblasts (IT) [5,10]. β-hCG is detectable in rare syncytiotrophoblastic cells and some intermediate trophoblastic cells [10]. KI67 expression is estimated at 10-30% [6].

Each gestational trophoblastic tumor has an immunohistochemical panel that guides it toward its identification. Table 4 presents the various immunohistochemical markers of these tumors.

Table 4. Table comparing the immunohistochemical characteristics of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumor; ETT: epitheloid trophoblastic tumor; PSN: placental site nodule; APSN: atypical placental site nodule; β-hCG: β-human chorionic gonadotropin; ST: syncytiotrophoblast; CK: cytokeratin; HPL: human placental lactogen.

References [3,5,6,10,11].

  PSTT ETT Choriocarcinoma PSN/APSN Exaggerated placental site reaction
CK Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity
HSD3B1 Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity Diffuse positivity
P63 Negative Positive Focally positive Positive Negative
HPL Positive Negative/focally positive Focally positive Negative/focally positive Positive
β-hCG Negative/focally positive (syncytiotrophoblast-like cells) Negative/focally positive (<2%) Diffuse positivity (ST) Negative/focal and weak positivity Negative/focally positive
Cyclin E   Diffuse positivity   Negative/focally positive  
Ki67 >10% >12% >50% of mononucleated cells <8% <1%

Unlike other trophoblastic tumors, PSTT is relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and surgery remains the main treatment option for patients with diseases confined to the uterus [2].

As reported by Lukinovic et al. [12], PSTT and ETT treatment is guided by two factors: an interval of ≥48 months from the causative pregnancy and stage IV disease. Stage I tumors (confined to the uterus) arising within <48 months are treated with total abdominal hysterectomy, along with retroperitoneal and pelvic lymphadenectomy if suspicious lymph nodes are present, with no need for adjuvant therapy. However, for tumors from a pregnancy >48 months ago or stage II-IV, aggressive platinum-based chemotherapy, including experimental options like high-dose chemotherapy or immunotherapy, is recommended and residual masses following treatment should be surgically removed [13]. Survival is approximately 100% for non-metastatic disease and 50-60% for metastatic disease [12].

The treatment of choriocarcinoma is based on chemotherapy, with a survival rate of 90% for non-metastatic forms and 70% for metastatic forms [10].

There is no targeted treatment for exaggerated placental site, though regular monitoring of β-hCG levels is required [14]. An exaggerated placental site is likely a physiological process that resolves after curettage and is not linked to a higher risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease [3].

The treatment of placental site nodules (PSNs) consists of the surgical excision of the nodule, and, for atypical PSNs, follow-up with pelvic MRI imaging is necessary [9].

Finally, Figure 10 summarizes the approach a pathologist may follow when gestational trophoblastic pathology is suspected [3,10].

Figure 10. Methodology in pathological diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease.

Figure 10

PSTT: placental site trophoblastic tumor; ETT: epitheloid trophoblastic tumor; PSN: placental site nodule; APSN: atypical placental site nodule; IT: intermediate trophoblasts; ST: syncytiotrophoblast; CT: cytotrophoblast; beta-hCG: beta-human chorionic gonadotropin.

Conclusions

Gestational trophoblastic diseases are disorders that can occur following term pregnancies, miscarriages, or molar pregnancies. The pathologist plays a crucial role in distinguishing the type of disease, which is essential for therapeutic decision-making, surveillance, and prognosis prediction. This highlights the need for a thorough analysis combining clinical findings, radiology, gross examination, histology, and immunohistochemistry. Such an integrative approach is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of these conditions.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Chaimae Daoudi, Anass Haloui, Nada Akouh, Karich Nassira, Amal Bennani

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Chaimae Daoudi, Anass Haloui, Nada Akouh, Karich Nassira, Amal Bennani

Drafting of the manuscript:  Chaimae Daoudi, Nada Akouh

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Chaimae Daoudi, Anass Haloui, Nada Akouh, Karich Nassira, Amal Bennani

Supervision:  Anass Haloui, Nada Akouh, Karich Nassira, Amal Bennani

References

  • 1.Placental site trophoblastic tumor. Behtash N, Karimi Zarchi M. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0208-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Placental site trophoblastic tumor: a case report and review of the literature. Lucas R, Cunha TM, Santos FB. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26622924/ J Radiol Case Rep. 2015;9:14–22. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v9i4.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 7th Edition. New York, NY: Springer; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia—pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets. Shih IM. Lancet Oncol. 2007;6:642. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70204-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT): a case report and review of the literature. Zampacorta C, Pasciuto MP, Ferro B, et al. Pathologica. 2023;115:111–116. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020. Female Genital Tumours: WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Placental site trophoblastic tumour and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour. Hancock BW, Tidy J. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;74:131–148. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pathology of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) Kaur B. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;74:3–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.PathologyOutlines.com. Placental site nodule. [ Dec; 2024 ]. 2023. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/fallopiantubesplacentalsitenodule.html https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/fallopiantubesplacentalsitenodule.html
  • 10.Gestational trophoblastic disease. (Article in French) Allias F, Bolze PA, Gaillot-Durand L, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M. Ann Pathol. 2014;34:434–447. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The placental site nodule: an immunohistochemical study. Shitabata PK, Rutgers JL. Hum Pathol. 1994;25:1295. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Advances in diagnostics and management of gestational trophoblastic disease. Lukinovic N, Malovrh EP, Takac I, Sobocan M, Knez J. Radiol Oncol. 2022;56:430–439. doi: 10.2478/raon-2022-0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease in the 2020s. Clark JJ, Slater S, Seckl MJ. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;33:7–12. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Exaggerated placental site in a cesarean scar: misdiagnosed as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a case report. Chen Z, Wang M, Yang P, Yao B, Shuai H, Li P. Exp Ther Med. 2024;28:298. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES