Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genitourinary Medicine logoLink to Genitourinary Medicine
. 1993 Oct;69(5):346–351. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.5.346

Diagnosis of genital human papillomavirus (HPV) lesions in the male: correlation of peniscopy, histology and in situ hybridisation.

M I Hippeläinen 1, S Syrjänen 1, M J Hippeläinen 1, S Saarikoski 1, K Syrjänen 1
PMCID: PMC1195115  PMID: 8244350

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the diagnostic criteria of genital HPV lesions in male sexual partners of HPV infected women. METHODS--Peniscopically directed biopsy specimens (from 693 lesions in 300 men) were examined on light microscopy and in situ hybridisation (ISH) for HPV types 6,11,16,18,31,33 and 42. The predictive value of different histological criteria for ISH positivity was also evaluated using stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS--Flat HPV lesions were most accurately predicted by the punctuation pattern on peniscopy, giving the concordance between peniscopy and histology between peniscopy and histology of 79.5% (66/83) and that between peniscopy and ISH of 56.6% (47/83). Diffuse acetowhite pattern disclosed a typical HPV lesion in only 17.8% (13/73), and HPV DNA was found in 11.0% (8/73) of cases. Of the 114 biopsy specimens from peniscopically healthy areas adjacent (0.5-1 cm) to the lesions, 93.0% (106/114) were normal on light microscopy, and HPV DNA was found in only 2.6%. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions were most frequently ISH positive, 81.1% (30/37), 50% showing HPV 16 and/or 18 DNA. Lesions classified as HPV-suspicious or nonspecific on light microscopy were HPV DNA-positive in 16.9% (11/65) and 8.1% (13/160), the frequency of high-risk HPV types being 3.1% and 1.3%, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, koilocytosis was the most powerful predictor of ISH-positivity in the flat lesions (without PIN), the risk ratio being 3.7. CONCLUSION--No conclusive peniscopic criteria for male HPV infections could be established, making histological evaluation mandatory. Care should be exercised in interpreting as HPV lesions the cases devoid of koilocytosis, HPV typing being essential in confirming the diagnosis in doubtful cases.

Full text

PDF
346

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrasso R., De Brux J., Croissant O., Orth G. High prevalence of papillomavirus-associated penile intraepithelial neoplasia in sexual partners of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 8;317(15):916–923. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710083171502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cocks P. S., Peel K. R., Cartwright R. A., Adib R. Carcinoma of penis and cervix. Lancet. 1980 Oct 18;2(8199):855–856. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90195-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Costa S., Syrjänen S., Vendra C., Chang F., Guida G., Tervahauta A., Hippeläinen M., Syrjänen K. Detection of human papillomavirus infections in the male sexual partners of women attending an STD clinic in Bologna. Int J STD AIDS. 1992 Sep-Oct;3(5):338–346. doi: 10.1177/095646249200300507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Del Mistro A., Braunstein J. D., Halwer M., Koss L. G. Identification of human papillomavirus types in male urethral condylomata acuminata by in situ hybridization. Hum Pathol. 1987 Sep;18(9):936–940. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80272-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Griffiths M., Penna L. K., Tovey S. J. Aceto-white change of the glans penis associated with balanitis not human papillomavirus infection. Int J STD AIDS. 1991 May-Jun;2(3):211–212. doi: 10.1177/095646249100200315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hippeläinen M., Yliskoski M., Saarikoski S., Syrjänen S., Syrjänen K. Genital human papillomavirus lesions of the male sexual partners: the diagnostic accuracy of peniscopy. Genitourin Med. 1991 Aug;67(4):291–296. doi: 10.1136/sti.67.4.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krebs H. B. Genital HPV infections in men. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;32(1):180–190. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198903000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Levine R. U., Crum C. P., Herman E., Silvers D., Ferenczy A., Richart R. M. Cervical papillomavirus infection and intraepithelial neoplasia: a study of male sexual partners. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jul;64(1):16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nuovo G. J., Becker J., Margiotta M., MacConnell P., Comite S., Hochman H. Histological distribution of polymerase chain reaction--amplified human papillomavirus 6 and 11 DNA in penile lesions. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992 Mar;16(3):269–275. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199203000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nuovo G. J., Hochman H. A., Eliezri Y. D., Lastarria D., Comite S. L., Silvers D. N. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in penile lesions histologically negative for condylomata. Analysis by in situ hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990 Sep;14(9):829–836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richart R. M., Nuovo G. J. Human papillomavirus DNA in situ hybridization may be used for the quality control of genital tract biopsies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb;75(2):223–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roman A., Fife K. H. Human papillomaviruses: are we ready to type? Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):166–190. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.2.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schneider V. Microscopic diagnosis of HPV infection. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;32(1):148–156. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198903000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schultz R. E., Miller J. W., MacDonald G. R., Auman J. R., Peterson N. R., Ward B. E., Crum C. P. Clinical and molecular evaluation of acetowhite genital lesions in men. J Urol. 1990 May;143(5):920–923. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40138-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sedlacek T. V., Cunnane M., Carpiniello V. Colposcopy in the diagnosis of penile condyloma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;154(3):494–496. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90589-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spitzer M., Chernys A. E., Hirschfield L., Spiegel G., Sedlis A., Zuna R. E., Steinberg B., Brandsma J. L., Krumholz B. A. Assessment of criteria used in the histologic diagnosis of human papillomavirus-related disease of the female lower genital tract. Gynecol Oncol. 1990 Jul;38(1):105–109. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90019-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Syrjänen S., Partanen P., Mäntyjärvi R., Syrjänen K. Sensitivity of in situ hybridization techniques using biotin- and 35S-labeled human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA probes. J Virol Methods. 1988 Mar-Apr;19(3-4):225–238. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(88)90017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Syrjänen S., Syrjänen K. An improved in situ DNA hybridization protocol for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA sequences in paraffin-embedded biopsies. J Virol Methods. 1986 Nov;14(3-4):293–304. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(86)90031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tabrizi S. N., Tan J., Quinn M., Borg A. J., Garland S. M. Detection of genital human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by PCR and other conventional hybridisation techniques in male partners of women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Genitourin Med. 1992 Dec;68(6):370–373. doi: 10.1136/sti.68.6.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weaver M. G., Abdul-Karim F. W., Dale G., Sorensen K., Huang Y. T. Detection and localization of human papillomavirus in penile condylomas and squamous cell carcinomas using in situ hybridization with biotinylated DNA viral probes. Mod Pathol. 1989 Mar;2(2):94–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. von Krogh G., Syrjänen S. M., Syrjänen K. J. Advantage of human papillomavirus typing in the clinical evaluation of genitoanal warts. Experience with the in situ deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization technique applied on paraffin sections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Mar;18(3):495–503. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(88)70072-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genitourinary Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES