Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Mar 28;15:10736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92150-1

Global, regional, and national epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis among people aged 20–54 years from 1990 to 2021

Ziyi Zhang 1,#, Xiaopeng Gao 1,#, Shiwei Liu 1, Qingshuai Wang 1, Yingjie Wang 1, Shuai Hou 2, Jun Wang 1,, Yimin Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC11953469  PMID: 40155668

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a global epidemic. We conducted a cross-sectional study using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 dataset to examine RA trends in patients aged 20–54 years worldwide. Key outcomes included incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), as well as trends over time, stratifying by region, country, age, sex, and Sociodemographic Index (SDI). We also assessed the contribution of smoking to RA-related mortality and DALYs. Over the past 32 years, the global RA-related incidence rate increased from 11.66 (95% UI 9.60–13.94) to 13.48 (95% UI 11.08–16.06) per 100,000 population. RA-related DALYs rate increased from 26.37 (95% UI 18.43–36.99) to 30.71 (95% UI 20.82–44.08) per 100,000 population, with females bearing a higher burden. And the RA-related mortality rate decreased from 0.09 (95% UI 0.08–0.1) to 0.06 (95% UI 0.05–0.07) per 100,000 population. Regional disparities were evident, with lower SDI regions experiencing the larger change. Smoking remained a significant risk factor, accounting for 9.01% of RA-related mortality in 2021. Overall, we highlighted the rising global burden of RA, particularly among females and in lower SDI regions, emphasizing disparities in healthcare resources, prevention, and early diagnosis.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, Global burden of diseases, Epidemiology

Subject terms: Pathogenesis, Rheumatology

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease, with a prevalence of 0.5–1.0% according to most epidemiological studies1. It predominantly affects females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1:2 to 1:3, and can manifest at any age, peaking around 60 years2,3. The incidence of RA displays both temporal and geographical variability, likely influenced by genetic and environmental factors4. Among these, smoking is a well-established environmental risk factor5, with secondhand smoke exposure in young individuals recognized as an independent risk factor for RA onset6,7. This disease imposes a heavy burden on patients and their families and has become a global public health issue.

According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, the number of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been increasing year by year from 1990 to 20218. Recently, the population of RA patients has been rising annually, yet epidemiological studies on RA in young and middle-aged groups have not been reported. In this study, we analyzed the trends in the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) associated with RA among individuals aged 20–54 from 1990 to 2021 using the GBD database, as well as the impact of smoking on the survival of RA patients. We hope this interpretation of the 2021 GBD estimates will promote the development of new prevention and treatment strategies to mitigate the health risks of RA.

Methods

Overview and data collection

We employed the Global Health Data Exchange query tool, developed by GBD collaborators, to collect data on RA among individuals aged 20 to 54, including standardized disease definitions and prevalence information9. The 2021 GBD study evaluated the incidence, mortality, and DALYs for 371 diseases and injuries across 204 countries and regions from 1990 to 2021, providing corresponding incidence rates and uncertainty intervals9,10. To summarize the age distribution of the RA burden, we categorized patients into seven groups: 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49, and 50–54 years. This study gathered data on RA case numbers, incidence rates, RA-related mortality, and RA-related DALYs, along with their rates at global, regional, and national levels. The GBD database does not include race and ethnicity data, as these categories were not collected. We calculated the average estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) using linear regression and collected data on risk factors associated with smoking-related mortality and DALYs in RA patients11. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Socio demographic index

The Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) quantifies the development level of a country or region by integrating fertility rates, educational attainment, and per capita income. The SDI ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating a higher degree of socio-economic development. Previous research has established a correlation between SDI and both disease incidence and mortality rates. In this study, we categorized countries and geographical regions into five SDI categories (low, low middle, middle, high middle, and high) to investigate the relationship between the burden of RA and socio-economic development9.

Statistical analysis

Numbers of incidence, mortality, DALYs, and their corresponding rates were the main indicators used to describe the burden of RA. Each rate is reported per 100,000 population, along with 95% uncertainty interval (UI) according to the GBD algorithm12. The dynamics of RA were analyzed by calculating estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) and average annual percent change (AAPC) to identify temporal trends in disease burden13; the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of EAPCs were estimated using linear modeling14. If the upper limit of both the EAPC and its 95% CI is negative, the corresponding rate indicates a decreasing trend; conversely, if the lower limit of both the EAPC and its 95% CI is positive, the corresponding rate indicates an increasing trend. Joinpoint regression analysis indicated that the annual percentage change (APC). Additionally, the RA-related mortality and DALYs rates caused by smoking were assessed. The population attributable fraction (PAF) quantifies the proportion of RA-related disease in the population that can be attributed to smoking. All calculations were performed using R Studio, version 4.1.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing). All P values were 2-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result

RA: Global trends

Incidence

In 2021, the global incidence of RA among individuals aged 20 to 54 years was 508,185 (95% UI 417,807–605,687). Between 1990 and 2021, the incidence in this age group increased by 81.21% (95% UI 74.44–88.97%). The incidence rate rose from 11.66 (95% UI 9.60–13.94) to 13.48 (95% UI 11.08–16.06) per 100,000 individuals, with an EAPC of 0.62 (95% CI 0.57–0.67).

In 2021, the incidence of RA among this age group increased with age (AAPC = 0.469; 95% CI 0.451–0.486; p < 0.001). The age group with the highest incidence for both males and females was 50–54 years, with male and female incidence rates of 13.15 (95% UI 8.80–18.54) and 28.98 (95% UI 19.50–40.45), respectively. The rate of increase was more pronounced in males (AAPC = 0.57; 95% CI 0.55–0.59; p < 0.001) than in females (AAPC = 0.43; 95% CI 0.41–0.44; p < 0.001). Joinpoint regression analysis indicated that the APC from 2018 to 2021 was 0.14 (95% CI 0.07–0.22; p = 0.001), with female incidence rates increasing more than those of males (0.22; 95% CI 0.15–0.28; p < 0.001) compared to males (0.08; 95% CI 0.01–0.15; p < 0.001) (Table 1 and Fig. 1A, Fig. 2A, B, C).

Table 1.

Incidence of Rheumatoid Arthritis in 20–54 aged 20–54 years between 1990 and 2021 at the global and regional level.

Location Rate per 100 000 (95% UI)
1990 2021 1990–2021
Incident cases Incident rate Incident cases Incident rate Cases change EAPC
Global 280,445 (230,796 to 335,292) 11.66 (9.60 to 13.94) 508,185 (417,807 to 605,687) 13.48 (11.08 to 16.06) 0.81 (0.74 to 0.89) 0.55 (0.52 to 0.57)
Socio-demographic index
  High SDI 76,181 (90,706 to 62,336) 17.25 (20.53 to 14.11) 101,854 (121,383 to 84,583) 19.73 (23.51 to 16.38) 0.34 (0.3 to 0.37)

0.51

(0.41 to 0.62)

  High-middle SDI 65,130 (77,868 to 52,985) 12.5 (14.95 to 10.17) 104,743 (124,954 to 85,647) 16.02 (19.11 to 13.1) 0.61 (0.5 to 0.73)

0.85

(0.83 to 0.86)

  Middle SDI 93,136 (111,447 to 75,641) 11.87 (14.2 to 9.64) 180,000 (215,051 to 147,793) 14.64 (17.49 to 12.02) 0.93 (0.8 to 1.07)

0.75

(0.73 to 0.78)

  Low-middle SDI 35,422 (43,041 to 28,884) 7.54 (9.17 to 6.15) 91,651 (111,169 to 75,658) 10.01 (12.14 to 8.26) 1.59 (1.5 to 1.67)

1.06

(0.95 to 1.17)

  Low SDI 10,349 (12,647 to 8280) 5.61 (6.86 to 4.49) 29,612 (35,678 to 23,877) 6.56 (7.91 to 5.29) 1.86 (1.8 to 1.93)

0.61

(0.48 to 0.74)

Regions
  Andean Latin America 2869 (2374 to 3378) 18.3 (15.14 to 21.54) 9774 (8154 to 11,440) 30.02 (25.05 to 35.14) 2.41 (2.11 to 2.68)

1.75

(1.67 to 1.84)

  Australasia 1894 (1464 to 2342) 18.82 (14.54 to 23.27) 3353 (2591 to 4112) 22.99 (17.76 to 28.2) 0.77 (0.6 to 0.94)

0.69

(0.45 to 0.93)

  Caribbean 1262 (1021 to 1503) 7.94 (6.43 to 9.46) 2342 (1935 to 2789) 10.21 (8.44 to 12.16) 0.86 (0.73 to 1)

0.81

(0.7 to 0.92)

  Central Asia 3056 (2519 to 3643) 10.28 (8.47 to 12.25) 7155 (6062 to 8219) 15.34 (13.0 to 17.62) 1.34 (1.16 to 1.57)

1.31

(1.21 to 1.41)

  Central Europe 8494 (6909 to 10,036) 14.32 (11.65 to 16.92) 9759 (7887 to 11,627) 17.85 (14.42 to 21.26) 0.15 (0.09 to 0.21)

0.71

(0.67 to 0.75)

  Central Latin America 14,537 (11,975 to 17,030) 21.31 (17.56 to 24.97) 36,667 (31,125 to 42,129) 29.34 (24.91 to 33.72) 1.52 (1.4 to 1.65)

0.95

(0.82 to 1.08)

  Central Sub-Saharan Africa 1248 (1018 to 1494) 6.17 (5.03 to 7.39) 4153 (3395 to 4907) 7.64 (6.25 to 9.03) 2.33 (2.16 to 2.48)

0.76

(0.66 to 0.85)

  East Asia 86,095 (68,850 to 104,695) 14.15 (11.32 to 17.21) 132,281 (106,413 to 161,093) 17.98 (14.46 to 21.9) 0.54 (0.4 to 0.7)

0.88

(0.84 to 0.91)

  Eastern Europe 13,566 (11,269 to 15,846) 12.3 (10.21 to 14.36) 15,156 (12,663 to 17,714) 15.38 (12.85 to 17.98) 0.12 (0.05 to 0.17)

0.63

(0.56 to 0.69)

  Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa 3541 (2845 to 4276) 5.22 (4.2 to 6.31) 10,056 (8091 to 12,085) 5.86 (4.72 to 7.05) 1.84 (1.78 to 1.91)

0.41

(0.32 to 0.5)

  High-income Asia Pacific 17,988 (14,020 to 22,243) 20.42 (15.92 to 25.25) 17,766 (13,745 to 22,025) 21.11 (16.33 to 26.17) -0.01 (-0.06 to 0.03)

0.27

(0.17 to 0.38)

  High-income North America 22,255 (18,848 to 25,773) 15.7 (13.3 to 18.18) 35,155 (29,934 to 40,645) 20.92 (17.81 to 24.18) 0.58 (0.52 to 0.65)

1.04

(0.88 to 1.21)

  North Africa and Middle East 7447 (6092 to 8883) 5.55 (4.54 to 6.62) 25,370 (20,601 to 29,664) 8.18 (6.64 to 9.56) 2.41 (2.18 to 2.65)

1.33

(1.27 to 1.4)

  Oceania 80 (62 to 101) 2.96 (2.28 to 3.75) 221 (173 to 275) 3.5 (2.75 to 4.36) 1.77 (1.59 to 1.96)

0.47

(0.42 to 0.53)

  South Asia 38,710 (31,077 to 47,778) 8.49 (6.81 to 10.48) 105,514 (84,598 to 131,418) 11.53 (9.25 to 14.37) 1.73 (1.64 to 1.82)

1.15

(0.99 to 1.32)

  Southeast Asia 7559 (5846 to 9395) 3.72 (2.88 to 4.62) 18,231 (13,967 to 22,595) 5.14 (3.94 to 6.37) 1.41 (1.2 to 1.63)

1.17

(1.14 to 1.21)

  Southern Latin America 2666 (2148 to 3169) 11.99 (9.66 to 14.25) 6714 (5632 to 7802) 20.06 (16.83 to 23.31) 1.52 (1.33 to 1.76)

1.6

(1.49 to 1.71)

  Southern Sub-Saharan Africa 5166 (4349 to 6110) 23.99 (20.2 to 28.38) 8125 (6796 to 9630) 20.67 (17.29 to 24.5) 0.57 (0.5 to 0.65)

-0.33

(-0.41 to -0.24)

  Tropical Latin America 7951 (6301 to 9765) 11.67 (9.25 to 14.33) 12,748 (10,316 to 15,109) 10.93 (8.84 to 12.95) 0.6 (0.5 to 0.71)

0.02

(-0.06 to 0.09)

  Western Europe 31,641 (25,422 to 38,259) 16.75 (13.45 to 20.25) 39,571 (32,005 to 48,344) 20.13 (16.28 to 24.6) 0.25 (0.21 to 0.3)

0.67

(0.6 to 0.75)

  Western Sub-Saharan Africa 2421 (1863 to 3051) 3.4 (2.62 to 4.28) 8075 (6235 to 10,019) 4.27 (3.3 to 5.3) 2.34 (2.24 to 2.46)

0.81

(0.67 to 0.95)

EAPC Estimated annual percentage change; SDI Sociodemographic index; UI Uncertainty interval.

EAPC is expressed as 95% CIs.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Trends in rheumatoid arthritis incidence, deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) among people aged 20–54 years from 1990 to 2021. (A) Trends in incident cases and incidence rate. (B) Trends in death cases and death rate. (C) Trends in DALYs cases and DALYs rate.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Trends in annual percent change (APC) in Rheumatoid Arthritis Incidence, Deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) Among People Aged 20–54 years from 1990 to 2021, Abbreviations: APC, Annual Percent Change. (A) APC in incidence rate of both females and males. (B) APC in incidence rate of females. (C) APC in incidence rate of males. (D) APC in death rate of both females and males. (E) APC in death rate of females. (F) APC in death rate of males. (G) APC in DALYs rate of both females and males. (H) APC in DALYs rate of females. (I) APC in DALYs rate of males.

Mortality

Over the past 32 years, the global number of RA-associated deaths among individuals aged 20 to 54 years increased by 2.97%. In contrast, the RA-associated death rate decreased from 0.09 (95% UI 0.08–0.11) per 100,000 in 1990 to 0.06 (95% UI 0.05–0.07) per 100,000 in 2021, with an EAPC of − 1.13 (95% CI − 1.24 to − 1.11) and an AAPC of − 1.36 (95% CI − 1.62 to − 1.10; p < 0.001) (eTable 1 in Supplement 1). The joinpoint regression model indicated an APC of − 1.55 (95% CI − 1.74 to − 1.36; p < 0.001) for the period 2011–2021.

In 2021, the number of RA-associated deaths among females aged 20–54 years was higher than that among males, with 1542 deaths (95% UI 1357–1811) compared to 766 deaths (95% UI 496–984). The mortality rate for females was 0.08 (95% UI 0.07–0.10; APCC = − 1.66 [95% CI − 1.88 to − 1.44; p < 0.001]), significantly higher than the rate for males, which was 0.04 (95% UI 0.03–0.05; APCC = − 0.75 [95% CI − 1.04 to − 0.46; p < 0.001]). The joinpoint regression analysis revealed that the APC for females during 2016–2021 was − 2.21 (95% CI − 2.63 to − 1.78; p < 0.001), while the APC for males from 2012 to 2021 was − 0.95 (95% CI − 1.20 to − 0.70; p < 0.001). Mortality rates gradually increased among individuals aged 20 to 54 years, with the most significant increase (10.45%) observed in the 50–54 age group. In 2021, the RA-associated mortality rate among individuals aged 20 to 54 years was higher in females (0.30; 95% UI 0.26–0.34) compared to males (0.14; 95% UI 0.09–0.19). (Fig. 1B, Fig. 2D, E, F).

DALYs

The global number of DALYs associated with RA among individuals aged 20 to 54 years increased by 82.63% (95% UI 0.74 to 0.89) from 1990 to 2021. The EAPC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.67), while the AAPC was 0.49 (95% CI 0.45–0.53; p < 0.001) (Table 1 in Supplement 1). The joinpoint regression model indicated that the APC for the period 2012–2018 was 0.87 (95% CI 0.71–1.01, p < 0.001).

In 2021, the number of DALYs among females aged 20–54 years with RA was significantly higher (834,310; 95% UI 567,949–1,190,281) compared to males (323,562; 95% UI, 218,169 to 465,243). The DALYs rate for females was also greater (44.66; 95% UI, 30.40 to 63.71) than that for males (17.02; 95% UI 11.47–24.47). Furthermore, the APCC for females (0.45; 95% CI 0.41–0.49; p < 0.001) was lower than that for males (0.59; 95% CI 0.51–0.65; p < 0.001). From 1990 to 2021, RA-associated DALYs increased across all age groups, with the most significant rise (13.80%) observed in individuals aged 50 to 54 years. In 2021, the rate of RA-associated DALYs among individuals aged 20 to 54 years was higher in females than in males (Fig. 1C, Fig. 2G, H, I).

RA: SDI regional trends

Incidence

In 2021, the middle SDI region reported the highest number of RA cases, totaling 180,000 (95% UI 147,792–215,051). Conversely, the high SDI region exhibited the highest incidence rate at 19.73 per 100,000 individuals (95% UI 16.38–23.51). The low SDI region experienced a dramatic increase in incident cases, rising by 186.13% (95% UI, 180.13–193.19%). Notably, the most significant increase in RA incidence was observed in the low-middle SDI region, with an EAPC of 1.06 (95% CI 0.95–1.17) (Table 1 and Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Epidemiologic trends of incidence, Death, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) Cases and Rates in 5 Sociodemographic Index (SDI) Regions of rheumatoid arthritis from 1990 to 2021. (A) Trends in incidence cases and rate. (B) Trends in death cases and rate. (C) Trends in DALYs cases and rate.

Mortality

Among the five SDI regions, the high SDI (18.30%) and high-middle SDI (36.64%) regions showed a decrease in RA mortality. Conversely, among the remaining three SDI regions, the low SDI region experienced the most significant increase in RA-associated mortality (79.86%). In 2021, the middle SDI region reported the highest number of RA-related deaths (1,101; 95% UI 903–1291), while the low SDI region recorded the fewest (71; 95% UI 36–170). Additionally, the RA-associated mortality rate was highest in the middle SDI region (0.09; 95% UI 0.07–0.11) and lowest in the low SDI region (0.02; 95% UI 0.01–0.04). Notably, the high SDI region exhibited the lowest EAPC in RA-associated mortality rate (− 1.92; 95% UI − 2.07 to − 1.78) (eTable 1 in Supplement 1 and Fig. 3B).

DALYs

In 2021, the middle SDI region reported the highest number of DALYs associated with RA, totaling 439,138 (95% UI 301,260–623,170). Conversely, the high SDI region exhibited the highest rate of RA-associated DALYs at 39.96 per 100,000 population (95% UI 27.38–57.01). Notably, the low SDI region experienced the most significant increase in DALYs, rising by 178.64% (95% UI 159.19–193.87%) from 1990 to 2021. Additionally, the greatest annual percentage change in RA-associated DALYs was observed in the low-middle SDI region, with an EAPC of 0.99 (95% CI 0.90–1.08) (eTable 1 in Supplement 1 and Fig. 3C).

RA: Geographic regional trends

Incidence

In 2021, East Asia reported the highest number of RA cases among 21 geographic regions, with a total of 132,280 cases (95% UI 106,413–161,093). Conversely, Oceania recorded the fewest cases, totaling 220 (95% UI 173–275). The incidence rate of RA was highest in Andean Latin America, at 30.02 per 100,000 population (95% UI 25.05–35.14), while Oceania exhibited the lowest incidence rate at 3.50 per 100,000 (95% UI 2.75–4.36).

From 1990 to 2021, all regions except Southern Sub-Saharan Africa experienced a decline in RA incidence (EAPC, − 0.33; 95% CI − 0.41 to − 0.24). Andean Latin America saw the most significant increase in incidence (EAPC, 1.75; 95% CI 1.67–1.84), whereas the high-income Asia Pacific region had the smallest increase (EAPC, 0.27; 95% CI 0.17–0.38) (eTable 1 in Supplement). In 2021, the global SDI was 0.67. Twelve regions had RA incidence rates above the global mean, while nine regions were below it. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between geographic regional RA incidence rates and SDI levels (ρ = 0.70, p < 0.01) (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Incidence, death, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) rates for rheumatoid arthritis from 1990 to 2021. (A) Incidence rate. (B) Death rate. (C) DALYs rate.

Mortality

In 2021, East Asia recorded the highest number of deaths associated with RA, totaling 794 (95% UI 576–1023). Central Latin America had the highest mortality rate from RA, at 0.27 (95% UI 0.23–0.32).

The high-income Asia–Pacific region experienced the most significant decline in RA-associated mortality rates, with an EAPC of − 4.34 (95% CI − 4.89 to − 3.78). In contrast, Central Asia saw the largest increase in mortality rates, with an EAPC of 6.02 (95% CI 4.29–7.78). In total, nine regions reported RA-associated mortality rates above the global mean, while twelve regions reported lower rates. Furthermore, a bimodal distribution was observed between the death rate and the SDI level across geographic regions (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.01) (etable 1 in Supplement 1 and Fig. 4B).

DALYs

In 2021, East Asia reported the highest number of deaths associated with RA, totaling 794 (95% UI 576–1023). Central Latin America exhibited the highest RA-associated mortality rate, recorded at 0.27 (95% UI 0.23–0.32).

The Asia Pacific region classified as high-income experienced the most significant decline in RA-associated mortality rate, with an EAPC of − 4.34 (95% CI–4.89 to  − 3.78). Conversely, Central Asia saw the largest increase in mortality rate, with an EAPC of 6.02 (95% CI 4.29–7.78). In 2021, nine regions reported RA-associated mortality rates above the global mean, while twelve regions reported rates below the mean. The relationship between death rates and the SDI across geographic regions demonstrated a bimodal distribution (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.01) (eTable 1 in Supplement and Fig. 4C).

RA: National trends

Incidence

In 2021, China reported the highest number of RA cases among 204 countries, with a total of 128,221 cases (95% UI 102,852–156,715). Ireland exhibited the highest incidence rate at 37.74 per 100,000 population (95% UI 28.10–47.51) (eTable 2 and eFigure 1A in Supplement).

Chile experienced the most significant increase in RA incidence, with an EAPC of 2.09 (95% CI 1.95–2.23), while South Africa showed the largest decrease, with an EAPC of  − 0.42 (95% CI − 0.52 to − 0.32) (eTable 2 and eFigure 2A in Supplement). Additionally, Ireland had the highest SDI for RA incidence at 0.87, whereas Papua New Guinea had the lowest at 0.42. The global incidence of RA in 2021 was 13.48 per 100,000 population (95% UI, 11.08–16.07), with 70 countries reporting incidences above the global mean and 134 countries reporting below it (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.01).

Mortality

In 2021, China reported the highest number of RA-associated deaths, totaling 757 (95% UI, 545–986) (eTable 2 and eFigure 1B in Supplement). Lithuania exhibited the highest RA-associated mortality rate, recorded at 0.43 (95% CI 0.37–0.50) (eTable 2 and eFigure 1B in Supplement).

Turkmenistan experienced the most significant increase in mortality rate, with an EAPC of 11.14 (95% CI 9.47–12.83), while Norway showed the largest decrease, with an EAPC of − 5.26 (95% CI − 5.72 to − 4.8) (eTable 2 and eFigure 2B in Supplement). In terms of SDI, Lithuania (SDI, 0.85) had the highest RA-associated mortality rate, in contrast to Cabo Verde (SDI, 0.53), which had the lowest. The global RA-associated mortality rate in 2021 was estimated at 0.06 (95% UI 0.05–0.07), with rates exceeding the global mean in 57 countries and falling below the mean in 147 countries (ρ = 0.32, p < 0.01).

DALYs

In 2021, China reported the highest number of RA-associated deaths, totaling 757 (95% UI, 545–986) (eTable 2 and eFigure 1C in Supplement). Lithuania exhibited the highest RA-associated mortality rate, recorded at 0.43 (95% CI 0.37–0.50) (eTable 2 and eFig. 1C in Supplement).

Turkmenistan experienced the most significant increase in mortality rate, with an EAPC of 11.14 (95% CI 9.47–12.83), while Norway showed the largest decrease, with an EAPC of − 5.26 (95% CI − 5.72 to − 4.8) (eTable 2 and eFigure 2C in Supplement). In terms of SDI, Lithuania (SDI, 0.85) had the highest RA-associated mortality rate, in contrast to Cabo Verde (SDI, 0.53), which had the lowest. The global RA-associated mortality rate in 2021 was 0.06 (95% UI 0.05–0.07); the rates were above the global mean in 57 countries and below the global mean in 147 countries (ρ = 0.32, p < 0.01).

Risk factor for RA

The GBD database highlights the impact of smoking on RA. In 2021, smoking was responsible for 9.01% of RA-related deaths globally, with a PAF of 19.50% in males and 3.80% in females (eFigure 3A in Supplement). Furthermore, smoking accounted for 7.31% of RA-related DALYs, with percentages of 16.38% in males and 3.81% in females (eFig. 3B in Supplement).

Between 1990 and 2021, the global proportion of RA-related deaths attributable to smoking exhibited a declining trend (AAPC, − 1.74; 95% CI − 2.10 to − 1.39, P < 0.001), with a more pronounced decrease in females (AAPC, − 2.74; 95% CI − 2.97 to − 2.51, P < 0.001) compared to males (AAPC, − 1.25; 95% CI − 1.59 to − 0.90, P < 0.001). Joinpoint regression analysis further confirmed this decline in recent years (APC, − 2.16; 95% CI − 2.46 to   1.85, P < 0.001), again noting a greater reduction in females (APC, − 3.72; 95% CI − 3.85 to − 3.57, P < 0.001) compared to males (APC,  − 1.51; 95% CI − 1.80 to − 1.21, P < 0.001) (eFig. 4A, B, C in Supplement).

The global proportion of RA-associated DALYs attributable to smoking has shown a decreasing trend (AAPC, − 0.45; 95% CI − 0.53 to − 0.37, P < 0.001). This decline is more pronounced in females than in males (female AAPC, − 0.96; 95% CI − 1.00 to  − 0.91, P < 0.001; male AAPC, − 0.14; 95% CI − 0.24 to − 0.04, P < 0.01). Joinpoint regression analysis further confirmed this downward trend in recent years (APC, − 0.62; 95% CI − 0.71 to − 0.54, P < 0.001), with females experiencing a greater decline than males (female APC, − 1.41; 95% CI − 1.49 to − 1.34, P < 0.001; male APC, − 0.76; 95% CI 1.23 to − 0.28, P < 0.001) (eFigure 4D, E, F in Supplement).

Factors influencing EAPCs

EAPCs significantly differed from incidence, mortality rate, and number of DALYs in 1990; they significantly differed from SDI in 2021. The incidence in 1990 represents the disease pool at baseline, whereas SDI can be considered an index of the level of medical care. The EAPC in incidence was positively correlated with SDI (Spearman r = 0.698; P < 0.001), and the EAPC in mortality rate was positively correlated with SDI (Spearman r = 0.498; P < 0.001). EAPCs were positive correlated with rate of DALYs (Spearman r = 0.675; P < 0.001).

Discussion

Over the past 32 years, the global prevalence of RA has steadily increased, leading to significant medical and social costs and marking it as a critical public health issue worldwide. This study examines the incidence, mortality, and DALYs associated with RA in relation to smoking as a risk factor among individuals aged 20–54 across all GBD regions and countries from 1990 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the burden of RA over these three decades in regions with varying SDI levels. The results align with previous studies indicating an escalating RA burden in certain regions and countries. A comprehensive evaluation of RA epidemiological patterns can aid policymakers and clinicians in formulating effective prevention and management strategies.

Previous analyses had demonstrated that the incidence, mortality, and DALYs associated with RA are higher in females than in males globally1518. Our study corroborated these findings within the 20–54 age group. The increased prevalence of RA in females is attributed to hormonal influences, particularly the effects of estrogen16,17. Females exhibited greater susceptibility to the disease during middle and older age, with those experiencing early menopause showing heightened disease activity and a poorer quality of life compared to their counterparts with late menopause19. Additionally, our study revealed that the incidence and DALYs related to RA in females increased at a slower rate than in males, while female mortality rates related to RA decreased more rapidly. Joinpoint regression analysis indicates a recent slight acceleration in the incidence rate among women compared to men. Females typically bear a greater burden from RA, facing more severe disease progression, higher disability risk, and significant impairments in quality of life. Biologically, the pathogenesis of RA is primarily characterized by immune system dysregulation20. Estrogen may exacerbate the inflammatory response in females by increasing immune cell activity. Additionally, immune-related genes located on the X chromosome may contribute to stronger immune responses in females, owing to the dual role of the X chromosome21. Social and environmental factors further amplify this burden, especially in regions with low SDI and low-middle SDI, where females encounter greater challenges in accessing healthcare resources. Moreover, females often juggle multiple roles within the family and society, which may increase psychological and emotional stress in managing RA22. A busy lifestyle can also lead to irregular dietary habits and insufficient physical activity. Future research should examine these gender-specific differences from multiple angles, including biological mechanisms, social support, mental health, and healthcare accessibility. Targeted interventions are needed to alleviate the burden on female RA patients and enhance their quality of life.

Age is a significant risk factor for RA23. Previous studies indicated that the increasing proportion of the aging population correlates with a rise in both the incidence and DALYs associated with RA-related diseases24,25. Our analysis revealed that from 1990 to 2021, the incidence and DALYs of RA-related diseases among the global population aged 20 to 54 increased, while mortality rates decreased slightly, despite a general rise in global deaths. This trend reflected a shift in the disease spectrum. The etiological factors contributing to RA were varied, and with the advancement of industrialization and modernization, more individuals were exposed to these factors through occupational and other conditions26. Given that RA remained incurable, patients experienced substantial challenges regarding their quality of life and functional capacity, which contributed to the persistent rise in DALYs. However, the introduction of biological agents, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and other immunosuppressive drugs, significantly slowed disease progression and improved average life expectancy27,28.

The SDI in various regions and countries was positively correlated with the incidence and DALYs rates of RA, highlighting the significance of socioeconomic factors in RA management and prevention. In line with previous research29, the low SDI regions reported the most significant increases in RA incidence. RA exerts significant clinical and policy-level impacts in regions with low and low-middle SDI scores. These impacts encompass key areas such as medical resource allocation, early diagnosis and treatment, chronic disease management, and socioeconomic support30. These regions often face challenges, including resource shortages and unequal access to healthcare. These should focus on improving access to diagnosis and treatment, reducing healthcare costs, strengthening basic healthcare infrastructure, and fostering international cooperation. Through collaborative efforts, the quality of life for RA patients in low SDI and low-middle SDI regions can be enhanced, the social burden reduced, and public health development promoted. In addition, areas with high SDI also have high incidence rates. Populations in high-SDI regions were more susceptible to mental health challenges such as stress, anxiety, and depression, which influenced both the incidence and progression of RA. In addition, improvements in medical care and RA diagnostics-particularly the widespread implementation of early detection methods-led to an increased identification of RA cases, particularly in economically developed regions. This phenomenon explained the higher incidence of RA-related diseases in areas with elevated SDI31.

The rising incidence of RA in high-SDI regions reflects enhanced disease recognition and the adoption of advanced diagnostic technologies, such as rheumatology diagnostic equipment, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody testing, and imaging techniques32. These advancements have facilitated earlier diagnosis and improved case reporting, meaning that the observed increase in incidence is not indicative of a higher disease burden, but rather a result of improved diagnostic and reporting capabilities33. Thus, access to advanced diagnostic tools is crucial for ensuring the accuracy of disease burden data. Additionally, the observed decline in RA mortality in high-SDI regions underscores the significant role of advanced medical care in extending patient life expectancy. High-SDI regions provide timely pharmacological treatments, personalized interventions, and biologic therapies, all of which enhance patients’ prognosis and quality of life34,35. Through early diagnosis, personalized treatment, and precise disease monitoring, doctors can better manage patients’ conditions and reduce the burden and functional loss caused by the disease. At the same time, standardized tools also provide a solid foundation for the formulation of public health policies and scientific research3436.However, mortality rates in economically developed regions and countries were also higher compared to those in less developed areas. Even in economically advanced countries, income inequality could impact the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. Low-income groups in developed nations may face higher health risks due to an inability to afford medical expenses or a lack of health education37.

The incidence, mortality and DALYs burden of RA in different regions are affected by multiple factors, including access to healthcare, environmental exposure and socioeconomic conditions38. Regions with high healthcare accessibility, such as the high-income Asia–Pacific, typically exhibit lower mortality rates and DALYs due to timely diagnosis and access to advanced medical treatments39. Conversely, regions with limited healthcare access, including Central Asia and certain low-SDI areas, often face resource shortages, delayed diagnoses, and insufficient treatment options, resulting in a substantially higher disease burden. Regarding environmental factors, pollutants such as PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides have been linked to the onset and progression of RA40. For regions with occupational and environmental exposure, such as Central Asia and Andean Latin America, in-depth environmental and occupational health research is needed to develop effective prevention strategies41. Higher environmental regions typically benefit from stronger environmental regulations, better air quality monitoring, and cleaner water sources, leading to improved living conditions. Socioeconomically, individuals in economically underdeveloped regions often face challenges such as limited education, poor health awareness, and inadequate health infrastructure42. To address these disparities, economically underdeveloped regions require greater international cooperation to provide affordable and effective treatments, increase disease awareness, and reduce the impact of environmental exposures on RA. Furthermore, enhancing global health advocacy is essential to securing international attention and support for chronic disease management and promoting healthier development in low-income countries.

Smoking is a significant risk factor for RA-associated DALYs, particularly in males, although its impact has decreased over time43,44. Since 2013, The analysis of risk factors revealed the global RA-related mortality and DALYs attributable to smoking had shown a yearly decline, and the decline rate for females was greater than that for males. This reduction was largely due to the implementation of stricter smoking regulations in many countries and regions, leading to a global decrease in smoking prevalence45. The decline in smoking-related PAF and DALYs serves as a key indicator of the effectiveness of tobacco control policies and public health interventions. Looking ahead, it is essential to develop more personalized and regionally tailored public health strategies. These strategies should focus on targeted tobacco control education for high-risk groups, such as low-income populations and adolescents, while also implementing smoking cessation policies and providing adequate support for cessation. Multinational cooperation between both low-income and high-income countries will be crucial in advancing tobacco control efforts and alleviating the global health burden caused by smoking46. By further strengthening tobacco control policies, enhancing cessation support systems, and optimizing resource allocation, we can reduce smoking-related health losses and promote global health equity.

The GBD dataset has made significant contributions to global health research. However, it has several limitations, including missing race/ethnicity data, biases introduced by imputation methods, regional discrepancies in data collection, and delays in disease classification. These limitations compromise the representativeness and accuracy of the data. In particular, data quality is poor in low-SDI countries, where health information is often inconsistent, and imputation assumptions may not accurately reflect local conditions, especially when health data vary widely across regions. To address these issues, future GBD datasets should prioritize racial and ethnic health disparities, with a focus on in-depth analyses of specific ethnic groups to identify potential health risks. To mitigate the bias introduced by imputation, multiple imputation schemes could be incorporated, and sensitivity analyses should be conducted to evaluate the impact of different assumptions. Additionally, field surveys and data collection efforts in regions with limited data should be expanded. As the disease landscape shifts and new public health challenges emerge, the GBD system will need to update its disease classification system regularly to capture evolving global health trends more accurately.

Conclusions

The trends in RA incidence, mortality, and DALYs present a multifaceted public health challenge that necessitates a comprehensive approach. While advanceable treatment may be contributing to decreased mortality rates, the significant rise in incidence and DALYs signal that RA is becoming increasingly prevalent, particularly in low and middle SDI regions. To address this issue effectively, healthcare policies must prioritize equitable access to care, targeted prevention strategies, and education on risk factors such as smoking. Additionally, further research is warranted to understand the underlying causes of the observed gender disparities and to develop tailored interventions that can effectively mitigate the burden of RA globally.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (944.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 (GBD 2021) and GBD 2021 collaborators for providing the data used in this study. Beyond the usual salary, no one received financial compensation for their contribution.

Author contributions

Z Z and G X are considered co-first authors. Drs Z Y and W J had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: All authors. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: L S, W Q and W Y. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: H S.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Shandong Natural Science Foundation General Project (Grant No. ZR2020MH094), China University Industry-University-Research Innovation Fund (Grant No. 2024GR050).

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ziyi Zhang and Xiaopeng Gao had equal contribution to this work.

Contributor Information

Jun Wang, Email: gjwkwj@sina.com.

Yimin Zhang, Email: ymzh69@hotmail.com.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-92150-1.

References

  • 1.Aletaha, D. & Smolen, J. S. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Jama320(13), 1360 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Okada, Y. et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis: 2018 status. Ann Rheum Dis78(4), 446–453 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Serhal, L. et al. Rheumatoid arthritis in the elderly: Characteristics and treatment considerations. Autoimmun. Rev.19(6), 102528 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Myasoedova, E. et al. Is the epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis changing? Results from a population-based incidence study, 1985–2014. Ann Rheum Dis79(4), 440–444 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ishikawa, Y. & Terao, C. The impact of cigarette smoking on risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A narrative review. Cells9(2), 2020 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kronzer, V. L. et al. Investigating asthma, allergic disease, passive smoke exposure, and risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol71(8), 1217–1224 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burke, H. et al. Prenatal and passive smoke exposure and incidence of asthma and wheeze: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics129(4), 735–744 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Collaborators, G.B.D.R.A., Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, 1990–2020, and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol, 2023. 5(10): e594–e610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.The Lancet, P. Global Burden of disease 2021: Mental health messages. Lancet Psychiatry11(8), 573 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Diseases, G. B. D. & Injuries, C. Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet403(10440), 2133–2161 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Collaborators, G.B.D.R.F., Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet, 403(10440), 2162–2203 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Mortality, G.B.D. and C. Causes of Death, Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet, 385(9963), 117–71 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Ding, Q. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of ischemic stroke, 1990–2019. Neurology98(3), e279–e290 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang, Y., Fu, W. J. & Land, K. C. A methodological comparison of age-period-cohort models: The intrinsic estimator and conventional generalized linear models. Sociol. Methodol.34(1), 75–110 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aleixo, P. et al. Ankle kinematics and kinetics during gait in healthy and rheumatoid arthritis post-menopausal women. Somatosens. Motor Res.36(2), 171–178 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Islander, U. et al. Estrogens in rheumatoid arthritis; the immune system and bone. Mol. Cellul. Endocrinol.335(1), 14–29 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Favalli, E. G. et al. Sex and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol56(3), 333–345 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smolen, J. S., Aletaha, D. & McInnes, I. B. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet388(10055), 2023–2038 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Park, E. H. et al. Impact of early age at menopause on disease outcomes in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: A large observational cohort study of Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open9(1), e002722 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Firestein, G. S. & McInnes, I. B. Immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunity46(2), 183–196 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khan, D. & Ansar Ahmed, S. The immune system is a natural target for estrogen action: Opposing effects of estrogen in two prototypical autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol.6, 6353 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dey, M. et al. Association between social deprivation and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review. RMD Open8(1), e002058 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chalan, P. et al. Rheumatoid arthritis, immunosenescence and the hallmarks of aging. Curr. Aging Sci.8(2), 131–146 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zou, W. et al. Increasing global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: An epidemiological analysis from 1990 to 2019. Arch. Med. Sci.19(4), 1037–1048 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang, W. et al. Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, and attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019: Update from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol.41(7), 429–442 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Romao, V. C. & Fonseca, J. E. Etiology and risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis: A state-of-the-art review. Front Med (Lausanne)8, 689698 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nam, J. L. et al. Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of RA. Ann. Rheumat. Dis.69(6), 976–986 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jang, D. I. et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-alpha inhibitors in therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci22(5), 2719 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rudan, I. et al. Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and analysis. J Glob Health5(1), 010409 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang, G. et al. Does socioeconomic status affect outcomes in early inflammatory arthritis? Data from a Canadian multisite suspected rheumatoid arthritis inception cohort. J. Rheumatol.42(1), 46–54 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Thurah, A. et al. Use of primary health care and radiological imaging preceding a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Rheumatology (Oxford)62(2), 555–564 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Radner, H. et al. Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review. Ann. Rheum. Dis.73(1), 114–123 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Willame, C. et al. Incidence rates of autoimmune diseases in european healthcare databases: A contribution of the ADVANCE project. Drug Saf.44(3), 383–395 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Calabretta, M. M. et al. Precision medicine, bioanalytics and nanomaterials: Toward a new generation of personalized portable diagnostics. Analyst145(8), 2841–2853 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parimbelli, E. et al. Patient similarity for precision medicine: A systematic review. J. Biomed. Inform.83, 87–96 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ho, D. et al. Enabling technologies for personalized and precision medicine. Trends Biotechnol.38(5), 497–518 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kondo, N. et al. Income inequality, mortality, and self rated health: Meta-analysis of multilevel studies. BMJ339, b4471 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Safiri, S. et al. Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis 1990–2017: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis78(11), 1463–1471 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Beck, K. C. et al. Educational inequalities in adult mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Asia Pacific region. BMJ Open12(8), e059042 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Adami, G. et al. Association between environmental air pollution and rheumatoid arthritis flares. Rheumatology (Oxford)60(10), 4591–4597 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Coman, A. et al. An assessment of the occupational and environmental health needs in seven Southeastern European and West-Central Asian countries. J Epidemiol Glob Health5(4), 375–384 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brereton, C. F. & Jagals, P. Applications of systems science to understand and manage multiple influences within children’s environmental health in least developed countries: A causal loop diagram approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health18(6), 3010 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Scherer, H. U., Häupl, T. & Burmester, G. R. The etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Autoimmun.110, 1024005 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maisha, J. A., El-Gabalawy, H. S. & O’Neil, L. J. Modifiable risk factors linked to the development of rheumatoid arthritis: Evidence, immunological mechanisms and prevention. Front Immunol10.3389/fimmu.2023.1221125 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Collaborators, G. B. D. T. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet389(10082), 1885–1906 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reddy, K. S. et al. Integrating tobacco control into health and development agendas. Tob Control21(2), 281–286 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (944.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES