Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2025 Mar 16;2025:10.17912/micropub.biology.001491. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001491

Complete genome sequences of Rhodococcus equi phages CoffeeBean, Dorin, Francesca, Madraxi, and Tonitrus

Orin R Daspit 1,#, Andrew C Slagter 1,#, Drew VanWoerkom 1,#, Derby Effie Addison 1, Samantha M Arteaga 1, Rory E Barnard 1, Nick M Bultje 1, Junu Chung 1, Brenna M Coleman 1, Cameron D Figg 1, Audrey J Gonzales 1, Josiah M Hoekman 1, Kat H Irmen 1, Valerie G Krause 1, Natalie L Luginbill 1, Rebecca A Nulty 1, Alexander W Scofield 1, Marguerite C Sytsema 1, Charles E Tavera 1, Anna G Thomas 1, Simon P Troyer 1, Hannah Sheppard 1, Myles D Radersma 1, John T Wertz 1, Randall J DeJong 1,§
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC11955845  PMID: 40166408

Abstract

We report genomes of five phages isolated using the actinobacterium Rhodococcus equi NRRL B-16538 . Based on gene content similarity, one phage is assigned to actinobacteriphage cluster CF, one to cluster CR, two to cluster CG, and one that cannot be assigned to any existing cluster. The latter encodes a five-gene thymine hypermodification system.


Table 1. Characteristics of five phages isolated from Rhodococcus equi NRRL B-16538.

a Minimum 3 phage particles measured

Phage Name CoffeeBean Dorin Francesca Madraxi Tonitrus
Soil sample collection site Grand Rapids, MI, 42.931694 N, 85.581889 W Grand Rapids, MI, 42.928267 N, 85.587137 W Grand Rapids, MI, 42.93455 N, 85.58755 W Grandville, MI, 42.897778 N, 85.737222 W Grand Rapids, MI, 42.93155 N, 85.586913 W
Capsid size (nm)<sup>a</sup> 62-64 75-80 69-88 58-60 56-81
Tail length (nm)<sup>a</sup> 243-250 333-355 353-439 238-242 268-323
No. of 150 bp sequencing reads 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 856,305 482,745
Average shotgun coverage (fold) 194 104 296 1862 1081
Genome length (bp) 67362 136968 137748 64064 57971
Genome ends 3' single-stranded overhang,<br/>5' AGCCGCGTAC direct terminal repeat (4720 bp) direct terminal repeat (4862 bp) 3' single-stranded overhang,<br/>5' CCCGCC circularly permuted
G + C content (%) 67.3 48.0 48.0 66.2 69.0
No. of ORFs 95 282 281 108 84
Cluster CR CG CG CF Singleton
No. of tRNA-coding regions 0 33 33 0 0

Description

Rhodococcus equi is an Actinobacteria commonly found in soil and known to cause lung infections in livestock and immunocompromised humans (Weinstock & Brown, 2002). Limited phages capable of infecting Rhodococcus equi have been documented ( Summer et al., 2010; Bonilla et al., 2017; Radersma et al., 2024 ) . Here, we report on five phages isolated in 2023 using R. equi NRRL B-16538 and standard methods (Zorawik et al., 2024). Soil samples collected from ~ 5 cm below the soil surface were washed in PYCa broth and filtered (0.22µm pore size). Directly plating the filtrate in PYCa top agar with R. equi yielded phages Coffeebean and Madraxi. Incubation of the filtrate with R. equi for 2 days at 30˚C before refiltration and plating yielded Dorin, Francesca, and Tonitrus. All phages have siphovirus morphologies, as determined by transmission electron microscopy.

Phage DNA was extracted from lysate using a Qiagen DNeasy kit, then prepared for sequencing using the NEBNext Ultra II-FS DNA library prep kit. Sequencing was performed with an Illumina MiSeq (v3 reagents), yielding 150-base single-end reads that were assembled using Newbler v2.9 and Consed v29 with 104 to 1862-fold shotgun coverage (Miller et al., 2010; Gordon & Green, 2013; Russell, 2018). Genomes were then annotated using DNA Master v5.23.6 (Pope & Jacobs-Sera, 2018), PECAAN v20221109 (Rinehart et al., 2016), Glimmer v3.02 (Kelley et al., 2012), Genemark v2.5 (Besemer et al., 2001), Phamerator (Actino_draft database v578) (Cresawn et al., 2011), BLASTp v.2.14.1 (Actinobacteriophage and NCBI non-redundant protein databases) (McGinnis & Madden, 2004), HHPred (PDB, UniProt, Pfam-A v.36, and NCBI v.3.19 databases) (Söding et al., 2005), Aragorn (Laslett & Canback, 2004), tRNAscanSE v2.0 (Lowe & Eddy, 1997), DeepTMHMM v1.0.24 (Hallgren et al., 2022), and TOPCONS v2.0 (Tsirigos et al., 2015), all using default parameters. Sequencing details and genomic characteristics are provided in Table 1.

Phages were assigned to clusters based on gene content similarity (GCS) of at least 35 % (Pope et al., 2017) to phages in the actinobacteriophage database (https://phagesdb.org/). Phage Tonitrus did not meet this threshold and is therefore classified as a singleton. The first five genes of Tonitrus may be associated with a thymidine hypermodification (THM) system, including a parB-like nuclease domain, a tet-like J-binding protein, an aGPT-Pplase2 domain protein, a 5-hmU DNA kinase, and a hypothetical protein (Lee et al., 2018, 2022). This system may defend against bacterial restriction endonucleases through chemical modification of thymidine (Lee et al., 2018, 2022; Flodman et al., 2019). Phage CoffeeBean is assigned to cluster CR, which is principally composed of phages isolated using Gordonia ; to date, only seven of forty-nine cluster CR phages were isolated using R.equi (Radersma et al., 2024). Phages Dorin and Francesca share 91% GCS, are assigned to cluster CG, and contain 33 tRNA-coding regions each. Phage Madraxi is assigned to cluster CF and is the only phage presumed to be a temperate phage based on the presence of identifiable serine integrase and immunity repressor functions; these functions could not be identified in the other four phages. Except for Tonitrus, a translational frameshift in the tail assembly chaperone protein was identified for the other phages reported here.

Data availability. Annotated genome sequences can be accessed for CoffeeBean, Dorin, Francesca, Madraxi, and Tonitrus at GenBank accession numbers PP978888 , PQ114736 , PP978770 , PP978820 , PP978825 , respectively. Sequence reads are deposited at NCBI under SRA accession numbers SRX25029070 , SRX25029071 , SRX25029053 , SRX25029059 , SRX25029066 .

Acknowledgments

We thank Lori Keen for her excellent assistance with the Calvin phage research course and the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program for collaborative support.

Funding Statement

We thank the Star and Talen families for their generous support of the phage research course at Calvin University.

References

  1. Besemer J. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Research. 2001 Jun 15;29(12):2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonilla J. Alfred, Isern Sharon, Findley Ann M., Klyczek Karen K., Michael Scott F., Saha Margaret S., Buchser William J., Forsyth Mark H., Paudel Sudip, Gissendanner Christopher R., Wiedemeier Allison M. D., Alonzo Fernanda L., University of Wisconsin–River Falls SEA-PHAGES. Florida Gulf Coast University SEA-PHAGES. University of Louisiana–Monroe SEA-PHAGES. College of William & Mary SEA-PHAGES. Garlena Rebecca A., Russell Daniel A., Pope Welkin H., Cresawn Steven G., Jacobs-Sera Deborah, Hatfull Graham F. Genome Sequences of 19 Rhodococcus erythropolis Cluster CA Phages. Genome Announcements. 2017 Dec 7;5(49) doi: 10.1128/genomea.01201-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cresawn Steven G, Bogel Matt, Day Nathan, Jacobs-Sera Deborah, Hendrix Roger W, Hatfull Graham F. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Oct 12;12(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flodman Kiersten, Tsai Rebecca, Xu Michael Y., Corrêa Ivan R., Copelas Alyssa, Lee Yan-Jiun, Xu Ming-Qun, Weigele Peter, Xu Shuang-yong. Type II Restriction of Bacteriophage DNA With 5hmdU-Derived Base Modifications. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019 Mar 29;10 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon David, Green Phil. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing . Bioinformatics. 2013 Aug 31;29(22):2936–2937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hallgren Jeppe, Tsirigos Konstantinos D., Pedersen Mads Damgaard, Almagro Armenteros José Juan, Marcatili Paolo, Nielsen Henrik, Krogh Anders, Winther Ole. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. 2022 Apr 10; doi: 10.1101/2022.04.08.487609. [DOI]
  7. Kelley David R., Liu Bo, Delcher Arthur L., Pop Mihai, Salzberg Steven L. Gene prediction with Glimmer for metagenomic sequences augmented by classification and clustering. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011 Nov 17;40(1):e9–e9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laslett D. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004 Jan 2;32(1):11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee Yan-Jiun, Dai Nan, Müller Stephanie I, Guan Chudi, Parker Mackenzie J, Fraser Morgan E, Walsh Shannon E, Sridar Janani, Mulholland Andrew, Nayak Krutika, Sun Zhiyi, Lin Yu-Cheng, Comb Donald G, Marks Katherine, Gonzalez Reyaz, Dowling Daniel P, Bandarian Vahe, Saleh Lana, Corrêa Ivan R, Weigele Peter R. Pathways of thymidine hypermodification. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021 Sep 15;50(6):3001–3017. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee Yan-Jiun, Dai Nan, Walsh Shannon E., Müller Stephanie, Fraser Morgan E., Kauffman Kathryn M., Guan Chudi, Corrêa Ivan R., Weigele Peter R. Identification and biosynthesis of thymidine hypermodifications in the genomic DNA of widespread bacterial viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018 Mar 19;115(14) doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714812115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowe Todd M., Eddy Sean R. tRNAscan-SE: A Program for Improved Detection of Transfer RNA Genes in Genomic Sequence. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997 Mar 1;25(5):955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McGinnis S., Madden T. L. BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004 Jul 1;32(Web Server):W20–W25. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller Jason R., Koren Sergey, Sutton Granger. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics. 2010 Jun 1;95(6):315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pope Welkin H., Jacobs-Sera Deborah. Annotation of Bacteriophage Genome Sequences Using DNA Master: An Overview. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2017 Nov 14;:217–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_16. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Pope Welkin H., Mavrich Travis N., Garlena Rebecca A., Guerrero-Bustamante Carlos A., Jacobs-Sera Deborah, Montgomery Matthew T., Russell Daniel A., Warner Marcie H., Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) Hatfull Graham F. Bacteriophages of Gordonia spp. Display a Spectrum of Diversity and Genetic Relationships . mBio. 2017 Sep 6;8(4) doi: 10.1128/mbio.01069-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Radersma Myles D., Lathrop Gabrielle, Moleakunnel Karena C., Harlow Luke A., Baker Aerin E., Chen Alison J., Churu Jason G., Dole Carly A., Doorn Sophia L., Hill Ethan M., Howland Anna, Janvier Amanda, Kramer Catie M., Minasian Matt J., Nieze Jocelyn R., Perezrios Isabella K., Ramsey Fiona J., Seinen Katie L., Swierenga Sierra K., Veenstra Michael M., Weaver Grace E., White Alexandra C., Yoon Esther, Wertz John T., DeJong Randall J. Complete genome sequences of nine Rhodococcus equi phages . Microbiology Resource Announcements. 2024 Feb 15;13(2) doi: 10.1128/mra.01088-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rinehart, C. A., Gaffney, B., Wood, J. D., & Smith, J. (2016). PECAAN, a Phage Evidence Collection And Annotation Network . https://discover.kbrinsgd.org/login
  18. Russell Daniel A. Sequencing, Assembling, and Finishing Complete Bacteriophage Genomes. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2017 Nov 14;:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Soding J., Biegert A., Lupas A. N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server):W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Summer E. J., Liu M., Gill J. J., Grant M., Chan-Cortes T. N., Ferguson L., Janes C., Lange K., Bertoli M., Moore C., Orchard R. C., Cohen N. D., Young R. Genomic and Functional Analyses of Rhodococcus equi Phages ReqiPepy6, ReqiPoco6, ReqiPine5, and ReqiDocB7 . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011 Jan 15;77(2):669–683. doi: 10.1128/aem.01952-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tsirigos Konstantinos D., Peters Christoph, Shu Nanjiang, Käll Lukas, Elofsson Arne. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015 May 12;43(W1):W401–W407. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weinstock David M., Brown Arthur E. Rhodococcus equi: An Emerging Pathogen . Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2002 May 15;34(10):1379–1385. doi: 10.1086/340259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zorawik Michelle, Jacobs-Sera Deborah, Freise Amanda C., SEA-PHAGES. Reddi Krisanavane. Isolation of Bacteriophages on Actinobacteria Hosts. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2024:273–298. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3798-2_17. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES