Skip to main content
BMC Medical Education logoLink to BMC Medical Education
. 2025 Apr 1;25:468. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06955-9

Bridging the gap: empowering physiotherapy students to cultivate patient engagement

James Roberts 1,, Bradley Stephen Neal 1, Adrian Mallows 1
PMCID: PMC11959949  PMID: 40170007

Abstract

This comment article highlights the often-overlooked voices of patients in healthcare and students in education. It advocates for co-creation in physiotherapy education to help students develop the skills and confidence needed to support greater patient involvement in healthcare, as outlined in the NHS long-term plan.

Keywords: Education, Co-creation, Patient involvement


The Lord Darzi report recognises the National Health Service (NHS) as more than a healthcare system, “it is a social movement with people working together to treat sickness and achieve better health.” [1] Supporting greater patient involvement through approaches such as shared decision making and self-management support is valued by patients and clinicians [2] and was outlined as a focus for the NHS in its 2018 long-term plan [3]. Empowering patients to have the knowledge, skills and confidence to be involved in their healthcare decisions has been titled “the blockbuster drug of the century” [4], resulting in better outcomes, experiences, lessening of health inequalities, and reducing avoidable usage of services [5].

Resources to facilitate patient involvement have been developed by both the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and the Personalised Care Institute [6]. Despite these resources being referred to in evidence-based guidelines that are designed to change practice [7], clinical practice remains didactical and patient involvement in their care can be limited [8]. Physiotherapists’ implementation of these approaches is particularly underwhelming in musculoskeletal healthcare [9]. One reason could be the reported seventeen-year time lag from idea to practice, with healthcare professionals described as ‘resistant to change’ [7]. Other barriers in healthcare have been explored, for example clinicians feeling it is their responsibility to act in the best interests of their patients, or that patients can assume a passive role and not want to be involved [8], conversely patients report feeling unable rather than unwilling to speak up or feeling pressure to be compliant [10].

Parallels with healthcare can be seen in education, where the push for evidence-informed teaching to support greater student participation is not yet commonplace [11]. Similar to the imbalance of power in healthcare, students often lack agency and voice [12], and the focus of the knowledge and skills to be acquired is influenced by a historical conception of paternalistic teaching [13]. This is particularly important as physiotherapy clinical practice reflects what students are taught during undergraduate training [14]. A hierarchical approach undervalues and underutilises the knowledge and skills that students bring to the classroom; particularly as greater involvement and autonomy can increase student motivation [15].

Students working collaboratively as co-creators in their own learning has been of developing interest in recent years. The term co-creation is defined as “meaningful collaboration between students and staff, with students becoming more active participants in the learning process, constructing understanding and resources with academic staff [16]. Active participation has been identified as the preferred physiotherapy learning style [17], and co-creation allows authentic opportunities for meaningful collaboration, supporting students to become stakeholders in their education and co-create teaching content, pedagogical approaches, assessment, and curriculum design [18]. Students involved in co-creation report greater performance, self-directed learning, self-regulation, and improved confidence and engagement [11]. A greater understanding of students’ perspectives can foster closer partnerships and support the delivery of more effective solutions [11]. Moreover, co-creation serves to strengthen these partnerships while offering students opportunities to cultivate essential relationship-building skills. Fundamentally, both healthcare and education are grounded in human connection, and “when people are supported by strong human relationships, change happens.” [19].

The paradigm shift required to facilitate greater patient involvement and help future clinicians may benefit from starting in an educational setting. Developing relationships and active involvement should become a regular experience over and above the taught knowledge to be acquired. Having shared responsibility with lecturers for their learning and greater involvement; sharing their previous experiences to set individual goals and identify actions to achieve required learning outcomes may support more meaningful and effective personalised learning environments. This parallels with approaches required to facilitate greater patient involvement in clinical practice, which include problem solving, goal setting, barrier identification, and action plans. With a reduced emphasis on knowledge acquisition, collaborative relationships with lecturers may offer the greatest simulation to support clinicians in developing the skills required to feel more comfortable with greater patient involvement and reduce the delivery of low-value care. New physiotherapy graduates often lack confidence in their capabilities upon graduation, and this involvement can support the development of self-efficacy in physiotherapeutic competencies [20].

Within the recent independent investigation of the NHS in England, patient voices were frequently reported to be unheard and change is required to offer patients greater involvement in their healthcare [1]. As the NHS places greater emphasis on population health and transitions to place-based approaches, allied health professionals are driving innovative community-created solutions through co-production [21]. Future clinicians will not only require the skills to engage individuals but also build equal partnerships with communities to foster trust and confidence in services. At university, by moving away from managing the perceived needs of an educator and recognising student voices, we can support the development of these essential professional capabilities. By shifting paradigms in education away from paternalism and towards empowerment through co-creation, graduates may be enabled to empower the patients of the future. Parallels between education and healthcare should no longer primarily focus on taught knowledge and more on the shared question: “How can I support you in your journey?”

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

NHS

National Health Service

Author contributions

J.R contributed to conception, design and writing. B.N contributed to writing (review and editing). A.M contributed to writing (review and editing). All authors reviewed the final manuscript as well as agreeing to their own contributions.

Funding

The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to declare.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Rt T, Darzi, Lord, Kbe OM, Fmedsci FRS. Independent Investigation of the National Health Service in England. 2024.
  • 2.Hutting N, Oswald W, Staal JB, Heerkens YF. Self-management support for people with non-specific low back pain: A qualitative survey among physiotherapists and exercise therapists. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;50. 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102269. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019 [cited 2023 Nov 20].
  • 4.Dentzer S. Rx for the blockbuster drug of patient engagement. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):202. 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson L, Kirk H, Clark B, Heath S, Royse C, Adams C, et al. Improving personalised care, through the development of a service evaluation tool to assess, understand and monitor delivery. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(3):1–8. 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Personalised care institute. Personalised care Institute curriculum August 2020. 2020;(August).
  • 7.Gupta DM Jr, Aron RJB. DC. The physician ’ s experience of changing clinical practice: a struggle to unlearn. 2017;1–11. 10.1186/s13012-017-0555-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Joseph-williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, Dodd C, Brain K, Elwyn G. Implement Shar Decis Mak NHS. 2017;1744:1–6. 10.1136/bmj.j1744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I. Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy: Observed Level of Involvement and Patient Preference. Phys Ther. 2013 Oct 1 [cited 2023 Nov 13];93(10):1321–30. 10.2522/PTJ.20120286 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Joseph-williams AN, Edwards A, Elwyn G. Power imbalance prevents shared decision making. 2014;348(May). 10.1136/bmj.g3178 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Bovill C. Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education. High Educ. 2020;79(6):1023–37. 10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, Moore-Cherry LM. Addressing potential challenges in co- ­ - creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusiv. 2015;(June):1–13.
  • 13.Oberta De Catalunya U. Students’ perspective on participation in a co-design process of learning scenarios Iolanda Garcia. Volume 4. Partnership and Change: Research articles Journal of Educational Innovation; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chesterton P, Skidmore N. Musculoskeletal physiotherapists reasons for treatment selection and continuous professional development practices in the united Kingdom: A cross-sectional survey. Physiother Pract Res. 2023;44(1):25–36. 10.3233/PPR-210619. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cook-Sather A, Bovill C, Felten P. Engaging students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. 2014.
  • 16.Bovill C. An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2014;51(1):15–25. 10.1080/14703297.2013.770264. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stander J, Grimmer K, Brink Y. Learning styles of physiotherapists: A systematic scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–9. 10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bovill C, Bulley CJ. A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. 2011.
  • 19.Cottam H. Radical help. 1st ed. Little, Brown Book Group; 2019.
  • 20.van Wijchen J, Alme MN. On becoming a (physio)therapist. Knowl Transform Heal Soc Care. 2022;125–39. 10.4324/9781003158721-9.
  • 21.Arthritis. & Musculoskeletal Alliance. Act Now: Musculoskeletal Health Inequalities and Deprivation. Report of ARMA’s Inquiry. 2024;(March):1–76.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from BMC Medical Education are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES