Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess the prevalence of cervical antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in two different populations and to correlate the findings to culture, direct fluorescent antibody test (DFA) and serum antibodies. SETTING--Antenatal clinics and clinic for teenage counselling in Gävle. PATIENTS--1078 pregnant women attending for routine follow up in the third trimester of pregnancy and 256 teenage girls. OUTCOME MEASURES--Cervical IgG and IgA antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis. Cervical cultures for chlamydia. Serum IgG antibodies. DFA tests were used only in the teenage group. RESULTS--The prevalence of positive culture was 2.0% in pregnant women and 8.6% in teenage girls. In pregnant women cervical IgG > or = 8 and IgA > or = 8 were found in 7.2% and 5.8% respectively and in teenage girls in 6.6% and 2.0% respectively. The agreement between cervical IgG > or = 8 and humoral IgG > or = 32 was 0.76 in the pregnant group and 0.95 in the teenage group. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for cervix IgG > or = 8 to predict a positive culture was 0.64, 0.94 and 0.18 respectively in pregnant women and 0.41, 0.97, 0.53 respectively in teenage girls. Of 31 teenage girls with either positive culture or positive DFA 12 had cervical IgG > or = 8 while five of 225 with negative chlamydia tests had cervical IgG > or = 8 (sensitivity 0.40 and PPV of 0.71). Cervical IgG > or = 16 was found in eight of 31 with positive chlamydia tests and in one of 225 with negative tests (sensitivity 0.26 and PPV 0.89). CONCLUSIONS--The finding of cervical IgG > or = 16 predicts current chlamydia (culture or DFA) in nearly 90% in a teenage population. It might indicate current infection in spite of negative culture in some cases. For low titres and in a low prevalence pregnant population cervical IgG are not useful for the diagnosis of chlamydia. As the sensitivity is low cervical antibodies cannot be used for screening purposes.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allardyce R. A., Bienenstock J. The mucosal immune system in health and disease, with an emphasis on parasitic infection. Bull World Health Organ. 1984;62(1):7–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bjercke S., Purvis K. Chlamydial serology in the investigation of infertility. Hum Reprod. 1992 May;7(5):621–624. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briese V. Humorale Aspekte der Schleimhautimmunität--Perspektiven für den weiblichen Genitaltrakt. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1986;108(21):1282–1288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brunham R. C., Martin D. H., Kuo C. C., Wang S. P., Stevens C. E., Hubbard T., Holmes K. K. Cellular immune response during uncomplicated genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in humans. Infect Immun. 1981 Oct;34(1):98–104. doi: 10.1128/iai.34.1.98-104.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carr M. C., Hanna L., Jawetz E. Chlamydiae, cervicitis, and abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jan;53(1):27–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grönroos M., Honkonen E., Terho P., Punnonen R. Cervical and serum IgA and serum IgG antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and herpes simplex virus in threatened abortion: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):167–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08903.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaeschke R., Guyatt G. H., Sackett D. L. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):703–707. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.9.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McComb D. E., Nichols R. L., Semine D. Z., Evrard J. R., Alpert S., Crockett V. A., Rosner B., Zinner S. H., McCormack W. M. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: antibody in cervical secretions as a possible indicator of genital infection. J Infect Dis. 1979 Jun;139(6):628–633. doi: 10.1093/infdis/139.6.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rank R. G., Barron A. L. Specific effect of estradiol on the genital mucosal antibody response in chlamydial ocular and genital infections. Infect Immun. 1987 Sep;55(9):2317–2319. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.9.2317-2319.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richmond S. J., Milne J. D., Hilton A. L., Caul E. O. Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in cervicovaginal secretions: relation to serum antibodies and current chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1980 Jan-Mar;7(1):11–15. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198001000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schachter J., Cles L., Ray R., Hines P. A. Failure of serology in diagnosing chlamydial infections of the female genital tract. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):647–649. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.647-649.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southgate L. J., Treharne J. D., Forsey T. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women attending inner city general practices. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Sep 24;287(6396):879–881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6396.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treharne J. D., Darougar S., Jones B. R. Modification of the microimmunofluorescence test to provide a routine serodiagnostic test for chlamydial infection. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jun;30(6):510–517. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treharne J. D., Darougar S., Simmons P. D., Thin R. N. Rapid diagnosis of chlamydial infection of the cervix. Br J Vener Dis. 1978 Dec;54(6):403–408. doi: 10.1136/sti.54.6.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witkin S. S., Jeremias J., Grifo J. A., Ledger W. J. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in semen by the polymerase chain reaction in male members of infertile couples. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1457–1462. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90781-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]