Abstract
Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a potent NK cell–stimulating cytokine, but the presence of immunosuppressive myeloid cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) can inhibit IL-12-induced NK-cell cytotoxicity. Thus, we hypothesized that trabectedin, a myeloid cell–depleting agent, would improve the efficacy of IL-12 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In vitro treatment of healthy donor NK cells with trabectedin increased expression of the activation marker CD69 and mRNA expression of T-BET (Tbx21), the cytotoxic ligands TRAIL (TNFSF10) and Fas ligand (FASLG) and the dendritic cell (DC)–recruiting chemokine lymphotactin (XCL1). The combination of IL-12 and trabectedin increased NK-cell cytotoxicity, activation and production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and granzyme B in the presence of human TNBC cells. Treatment of 4T1 and EMT6 tumor-bearing mice with IL-12 and trabectedin led to a significant reduction in tumor burden compared to single-agent controls, and the highest levels of plasma IFN-γ, intratumoral CD8+ T cells and conventional type 1 DC. MDSC and M2-like macrophages were significantly decreased with combination therapy. NK-cell depletion abrogated the effects of combination therapy, as did elimination of CD8+ T cells. NK-cell depletion led to lower levels of the NK cell–derived chemokine CCL5 and the DC-derived chemokine CXCL10, higher tumor burden, and decreased intratumoral CD8+ T cells. IL-12 and trabectedin also significantly enhanced the response of TNBC to anti-PD-L1 therapy. These data suggest that MDSC depletion augments the ability of IL-12-activated NK cells to drive the infiltration of DC and CD8+ T cells into TNBC for an antitumor effect.
Keywords: Interleukin-12, trabectedin, triple-negative breast cancer, natural killer cell, CD8+ T cell, chemokine
Introduction
Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine capable of inducing innate and adaptive immune responses (1). The ability of IL-12 to activate cytotoxic natural killer (NK) cells and T cells led to its identification as a potential immunotherapeutic agent. IL-12 therapy has demonstrated moderate efficacy in several tumor types including HER2-positive breast cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, but questions remain as to the optimal dose in relation to the toxicity profile (2,3). In the end, most patients fail to respond to IL-12 therapy (4). Several methods have been employed to improve the efficacy of IL-12, including localized administration techniques, gene therapy strategies and transfer of IL-12-transduced autologous cells (3).
In an effort to elucidate potential mechanisms of resistance to IL-12, several groups have conducted analyses of patients who received IL-12 therapy (4–6). In a clinical trial of IL-12 with trastuzumab, a HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody, sustained IFN-γ production by NK cells was detected only in patients who experienced clinical benefit (5). Similar results were seen in a follow-up trial combining IL-12 with trastuzumab and the chemotherapeutic paclitaxel, where only patients who had clinical benefit had measurable IFN-γ levels (2). In that study, IFN-γ output was also significantly associated with increased progression-free survival (PFS) and observed solely in NK cells. Preclinical models showed that depletion of NK cells prior to IL-12 administration attenuated its antitumor effect (7). These results suggest the NK-cell response to IL-12 therapy may be an essential element for achieving clinical benefit.
In some solid tumors, such as breast cancer, the presence of a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) may prevent the NK-cell response to IL-12 (8). About 15% of breast cancers lack expression of estrogen, progesterone and HER2/neu receptors (so called triple-negative breast cancer or TNBC) (9). TNBC is one of the most difficult to treat types of breast cancer due to its lack of targetable receptor expression coupled with its immunosuppressive TME. Currently only cytotoxic chemotherapy is available to patients with advanced disease (10). Incidence and outcome of TNBC is also highly disproportionate with Black women twice as likely to be affected and more likely to die from the disease than White women (11). Thus, there is an increasing need to develop additional therapeutic options for TNBC.
One of the populations in the TME that can inhibit NK cells are myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), which are increased in TNBC compared to non-TNBC and correlate with worse prognosis (12,13). TNBC can also exhibit tumor-induced dysfunctional NK cells (14). MDSC have been shown to significantly inhibit NK-cell cytotoxicity and cytokine production, two critical antitumor effector mechanisms augmented by IL-12 (15). MDSC can impair NK cells via contact-dependent mechanisms such as inhibitory ligand expression and through contact-independent mechanisms such as production of TGF-β, arginase and reactive oxygen species (16,17). Our group has shown that MDSC-derived nitric oxide can antagonize FcR-mediated NK-cell functions and response to antibody therapy (15). Moreover, reduced percentages of circulating MDSC have been found to correlate with improved PFS in IL-12-treated patients (18). Furthermore, monocytic-MDSC (M-MDSC) can differentiate into M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) within the TME and increased levels of TAMs are also associated with poor prognosis in TNBC (19). Thus, MDSC may mediate one mechanism preventing responses to IL-12 therapy.
Trabectedin is an FDA-approved therapeutic that can inhibit MDSC and M2-like TAMs (20). It has been utilized for the treatment of sarcoma due to its DNA alkylating abilities, however, it has also been shown to be capable of mimicking the ligand TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (20). TRAIL activation stimulates caspase-8-dependent apoptosis in TRAIL receptor 1/2 (TRAIL-R1/2) positive cells. MDSC and TAMs have increased TRAIL-R1/2 expression compared to lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs), resulting in a selective reduction in these populations by trabectedin (21). The myelolytic effect of trabectedin has been demonstrated in several models of cancer (22,23).
The present study sought to determine whether trabectedin would enhance the antitumor activity of IL-12. To test this, the impact of trabectedin on myeloid and NK cells was examined in vitro and in murine models of TNBC.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines
Murine TNBC cell lines 4T1 (ATCC Cat# CRL-2539, RRID:CVCL_0125) and EMT6 (ATCC Cat# CRL-2755, RRID:CVCL_1923), human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 (ATCC Cat# CRL-3343, RRID:CVCL_UC15) and human TNBC cell line MDA-MB-468 (ATCC Cat# HTB-132, RRID:CVCL_0419) were purchased from ATCC in 2010 (4T1, EMT6), 2014 (K562) and 2015 (MDA-MB-468). Human TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-231 (RRID:CVCL_0062) and MDA-MB-436 (RRID:CVCL_0623) were gifts from the laboratory of Dr. Steven Sizemore in 2023 (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH). All cell lines were maintained in culture with media (RPMI 1640: 4T1, EMT6, K562, MDA-MB-231 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 22400105) or DMEM: MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-436 (Life Technologies Cat# 11965–118)) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# F4135) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 15240–062). Each individual cell line was confirmed to be mycoplasma free by internal testing twice monthly using the Mycoplasma Detection Kit (SouthernBiotech Cat# OB1310001), authenticated by cytogenetic/karyotyping analysis and used for no more than 20 passages.
Human NK-cell isolation and treatment
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from healthy donor buffy coats acquired as commercially available products from Versiti Blood Center of Ohio. Each donor provided written informed consent prior to sample acquisition. Buffy coat samples from 30 healthy donors were included in the experimental studies under Institutional Review Board (IRB)–approved protocol for human subject research (OSU IRB protocol 1999C0348). Samples were shipped overnight at room temperature and processed immediately upon receipt. PBMCs were isolated from buffy coats using a Ficoll hypaque density gradient centrifugation technique as described (15). Briefly, buffy coat samples were layered on top of Ficoll density gradient medium (density=1.077 g/mL) and centrifuged at 1,500 RPM for 25 minutes with the brake off. PBMC were removed from the density gradient medium and residual red blood cells were lysed using RBC lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 46232). NK cells were isolated from PBMCs using the EasySep Human NK cell Isolation Kit (StemCell Technologies Cat# 17955) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Human NK cells were maintained in culture with RPMI 1640 media (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 22400105) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum (HAB) (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# H4522) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 15240–062). Human NK cells used in downstream assays were treated in vitro with (<0.01%) DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# D2650–100ML), 10 ng/mL recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12) (R&D Systems Cat# 219-IL-005) and/or 2.5 nM trabectedin (MedChem Express Cat# HY-50936).
Flow Cytometry
Purity of isolated human NK cells was confirmed using fluorescently labeled PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-human CD56 (BioLegend Cat# 398811, RRID:AB_2894512) and Pacific Blue anti-human CD3 (BioLegend Cat# 300329, RRID:AB_10552893) antibodies. Samples were used in downstream analyses if purity of NK cells (CD3–CD56+) was at least 90%. To assess treatment-induced cellular apoptosis, NK cells were treated in vitro for 48 h, harvested, and stained with APC anti-human/mouse/rat Annexin V (BD Biosciences Cat# 561012, RRID:AB_2034024) and PE Propidium Iodide Staining Solution (BD Biosciences Cat# 556463, RRID:AB_2869075). Cells negative for annexin V and PI were considered viable. Activation of NK cells in vitro was assessed by surface expression of CD69 using APC anti-human CD69 (BioLegend Cat# 310910, RRID:AB_314845) at 24 h. STAT4 phosphorylation was measured by intracellular flow cytometry using PE anti-human STAT4 phospho antibody (Biolegend Cat# 941205, RRID:AB_2936724) after 2 h treatment in vitro followed by fixation and permeabilization using True Phos™ Perm Buffer (Biolegend Cat# 425401). For measurement of murine splenic MDSC, spleens were processed into single-cell suspensions, lysed for red blood cells using RBC lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 46232), and stained with PE anti-mouse CD11b (BioLegend Cat# 101208, RRID:AB_312791), Pacific Blue anti-mouse Ly6C (BioLegend Cat# 128032, RRID:AB_2562178) and APC anti-mouse Ly6G (BioLegend Cat# 127614, RRID:AB_2227348). Total MDSC were defined as CD45+CD11b+Ly6C±Ly6G±, M-MDSC were defined as CD45+CD11b+Ly6C+ and PMN-MDSC were defined as CD45+CD11b+Ly6G+ (17). All flow cytometry samples were analyzed using a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and a minimum of 10,000 events were recorded per sample. FlowJo v10.6.1 (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520) was used for gating and analysis.
Real-time PCR
RNA was isolated from in vitro treated human NK cells using the mirVana isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# AM1560). A NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to assess the purities and concentrations of RNA. Reverse transcription was performed using 500 ng RNA in a 20 μL reaction with the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 4368814) to isolate cDNA. cDNA was then used to measure gene expression using SYBER green (Integrated DNA Technologies) or TaqMan (Thermo Fisher Scientific) chemistries for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) with the following commercially available human primers: ACTB (used for normalization, Hs.PT.39a.22214847, Integrated DNA Technologies), T-BET (Hs.PT.58.3936407, Integrated DNA Technologies), TNFSF10 (Hs00234355_m1, Thermo Fisher Scientific), FASLG (Hs01904942_s1, Thermo Fisher Scientific), XCL1 (Hs.PT.58.26896865.g, Integrated DNA Technologies), IFNG (Hs.PT.58.3781960, Integrated DNA Technologies), and GZMB (Hs00188051_m1, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each RT-PCR reaction was performed in triplicate using the ABI PRISM™ 7900HT fast RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems) and the 2ΔΔCt method was used to calculate fold changes. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using RM one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Cytotoxicity Assay
Isolated human NK cells were pre-treated in vitro prior to use with (<0.01%) DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# D2650–100ML), 10 ng/mL recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12) (R&D Systems Cat# 219-IL-005) and/or 2.5 nM trabectedin (MedChem Express Cat# HY-50936). After 24 h, NK cells were harvested and resuspended in fresh RPMI media supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic. Untreated tumor cells were labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CSFE) (Cat# C34554, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and resuspended in the same media. NK cells from each treatment condition and tumor cells were then co-cultured at an effector to target ratio of 10:1. After a 4h incubation, co-culture samples were harvested and stained using APC anti-human/mouse/rat Annexin V antibody (BD Biosciences Cat# 561012, RRID:AB_2034024) and Sytox Blue dead cell stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# S34857). A minimum 10,000 tumor cell events were collected per sample using a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Specific tumor-cell lysis was calculated after subtracting the percentage of spontaneously lysed tumor cells in the negative controls (wells with only tumor cells) from the percentage of lysed tumor cells in each condition. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using RM one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or paired student’s t-tests when appropriate.
Degranulation Assay
NK-cell degranulation was measured via flow cytometric evaluation of CD107a expression on the NK cell surface post-incubation with K562 cells. Briefly, NK cells were pre-treated for 24 h, harvested, resuspended in fresh media, and combined in a co-culture with K562 cells at an effector to target ratio of 10:1. CFSE (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# C34554) labeling was used to distinguish tumor cells from NK cells. 3 μL of PE anti-human CD107a (BioLegend Cat# 328607, RRID:AB_1186062) was immediately added to each well after cells were combined. After a 1 h incubation, 1x Protein Transport Inhibitor Cocktail (eBioscience Cat# 00–4980-93) was added to each well and incubation was continued for another 3 h. Samples were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry for CD107a expression using a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 10,000 NK-cell events were recorded for all samples. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using RM one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
ELISA
NK cells were pre-treated for 24 h, harvested, resuspended in fresh media, and combined in culture with MDA-MB-436 cells at an effector to target ratio of 10:1. After 24 h, cell-free supernatants were assessed for levels of IFN-γ (R&D Systems Cat# DY285B-05), TNF-α (R&D Systems Cat# DY210–05) and granzyme B (R&D Systems Cat# DGZB00) by ELISAs according to manufacturer’s instructions. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using paired student’s t-tests. For murine IFN-γ levels, plasma was analyzed using a mouse IFN-γ Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems Cat# MIF00) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 using RM one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Murine Tumor Models
To establish orthotopic murine models of TNBC, female 4–6-week-old BALB/c mice (Jackson Laboratories, RRID:MGI:2683685 ) were inoculated with 1×105 4T1 cells or 1×106 EMT6 cells in the mammary fat pad. Once tumors reached at least 50 mm3, mice were divided equally and randomly into treatment groups. Recombinant mouse IL-12 (rmIL-12) (R&D Systems Cat# 419-ML-050/CF) was reconstituted in sterile PBS and stored at −80°C. On the day of injection, rmIL-12 was thawed and diluted in sterile PBS to 0.5 μg per 100 μL. rmIL-12 was administered by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection 3x/week in a final volume of 100 μL. Trabectedin (MedChem Express Cat# HY-50936) was dissolved in DMSO at 4 mg/mL and stored at −20°C. On the day of injection, trabectedin was thawed and diluted in 0.1 g of Hydroxy B-Cyclodextrin (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# 332607–5G) and sterile PBS. Trabectedin was administered by tail vein injection 1x/week in a final volume of 100 μL at 0.15 mg/kg. Control treatments were performed with matched i.p. or tail vein injections of 100 μL PBS. NK-cell depletion was performed through administration of 100 μL of 1 mg/mL polyclonal anti-asialo-GM1 (FUJIFILM Wako Shibayagi Cat# 986–10001, RRID:AB_516844) via i.p. injection three days prior to the start of treatment and every four days thereafter. Anti-asialo-GM1 was reconstituted in distilled water upon receipt and dilutions were performed using PBS. This antibody has been used to perform in vivo depletion of NK cells in mouse strains lacking the NK1.1 allotype, which is a feature of BALB/c mice (14). We have previously determined that this regimen removes the majority of NK cells while leaving the macrophage compartment largely unaffected (24). 100 μL of IgG isotype control antibody (Bio X Cell Cat# BE0095, RRID:AB_1107793) was injected i.p. into non-depleted mice at the same timepoints. CD8a depletion was performed through i.p. injection of 100 μL anti-CD8a (Bio X Cell Cat# BE0061, RRID:AB_1125541) one day prior to the start of treatment (at a dose of 200 μg) and every four days thereafter (at a dose of 100 μg). Anti-CD8a dilutions were performed using PBS. 100 μL of IgG isotype control antibody (Bio X Cell Cat# BE0095, RRID:AB_1107793) was injected i.p. into control mice at the same timepoints. Anti-PD-L1 (Bio X Cell Cat# BE0101, RRID:AB_10949073) was administered by i.p. injection (100 μg/100 μL) 3x/week. An IgG isotype control antibody (100 μL, Bio X Cell Cat# BE0095, RRID:AB_1107793) was used as the control for anti-PD-L1 therapy and given i.p. at a dose of 100 μg/100 μL 3x/week. Tumor volume measurements were performed 3x/week using digital calipers for all studies. Mouse weights were assessed throughout treatments using a digital scale. All murine studies were approved by the Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted under an approved protocol (IACUC 2009A0179-R2). For statistical analyses of tumor volumes, linear mixed modeling was employed to model longitudinal tumor volume for mice under each treatment. Comparisons were done at each time point and averaged across all time points using t-statistics. The Tukey-Kramer method was used for adjusting raw p-values for multiple comparisons across treatment groups.
Mass Cytometry
To evaluate splenic and/or tumor immune cell infiltrates in mice post-treatment, a 30-antibody mass cytometry (CyTOF) panel was used (detailed reagent specifications in Supplementary Table S1) as previously described (25). In brief, spleens and tumors were processed into single-cell suspensions, washed with Maxpar Cell Staining Buffer (CSB) (Standard BioTools Cat# 201068) and incubated for 10 minutes in Fc-blocking solution (Biolegend Cat# 422301). Cells were stained with 45 μL of surface antibody cocktail and incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes before fixation with 1.4x Proteomic Stabilizer PROT1 buffer (Smart Tube Inc. Cat# 501351689) at −80°C. For intracellular staining, cells were washed with CSB and incubated for 15 minutes in methanol at −20°C. Samples were incubated with 50 μL of intracellular antibody cocktail for 50 minutes before 1.5% PFA (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 28906) and 500 μM Ir intercalator (Standard BioTools Cat# 201103A) were added. A 30-minute incubation at 37°C was performed, followed by washes with CSB and H20 prior to data acquisition. Samples were analyzed using the cloud-based computing software Cytobank v10.2 (RRID:SCR_014043). Immune population and phenotype definitions are described in Supplementary Table S2. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using ordinary one-way ANOVA tests with Tukey’s correction to adjust for multiple comparisons.
NanoString Digital Spatial Profiling of Murine Tumors
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse tumor tissue sections (5 μm thickness) were prepared on Superfrost Plus slides (n=2 tumor tissue sections per slide, 12 slides total) according to the GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP) protocol (NanoString Technologies, Inc., NanoString GeoMx DSP Manual Slide Preparation; MAN-10150–01). Three slides per treatment condition were analyzed (12 slides total, 24 total tumor tissue sections). Tissue preparation, antigen retrieval and antibody staining were performed as previously described (26). Fluorescently-tagged antibodies used for staining were nuclear stain, SYTO13 (121300303, NanoString Technologies, Inc.), leukocyte marker, CD45-EM-05 (NanoString Technologies, Inc., NBP1–44763), tumor cell marker, PanCK-AE1 + -AE3 (NanoString Technologies, Inc., NBP2–33200) and NK-cell marker, CD49b-PerCP/Cyanine5.5 (Biolegend, clone HMα2, 1:50 dilution). The following oligo-tagged NanoString GeoMx mouse detection antibody mixtures were used: Immune Cell Profiling Panel, Cell Death Panel, IO Drug Target Panel, Immune Activation Status Panel, Immune Cell Typing Panel, PI3K/AKT Signaling Panel and MAPK Signaling Panel Death quantifying expression of a total of 71 proteins (see Supplementary Table S3 for the detailed list of detection targets and antibodies).
Stained slides were scanned using a GeoMx DSP instrument (NanoString Technologies, Inc.). Six regions of interest (ROIs) were selected within each tumor tissue section for a total of 12 ROIs per slide (n=3 slides/treatment condition). 144 total ROIs were analyzed. In each ROI, immune cells and tumor cells were defined by manually selecting a CD45 fluorescence threshold and PanCK fluorescence threshold that visually maximized the two individual cell types. Oligos from each ROI segment were cleaved, collected and dried in a 96-well flat-bottom plate. Oligos were subsequently hybridized to unique reporter tags and counted using the nCounter platform (NanoString Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. GeoMx Software v2.4 (NanoString Technologies, Inc.) was used for all data quality control, normalization and differential expression analyses according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Proteins significantly differentially expressed between treatment groups were determined using a linear mixed model to account for multiple ROI sections within individual samples and batch effects between runs followed by p-value correction using Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) procedure.
Mouse Luminex Discovery Assay
Plasma was isolated from mice at the time of sacrifice in both the NK-cell depletion and the CD8a-depletion studies 24 h post-IL-12 administration. A bead-based Luminex® Multiplex Assay (R&D Systems LXSAMSM-10 lot #L151841) was then used to measure circulating levels of IFN-γ (BR33), TNF-α (BR14), GM-CSF (BR12), granzyme B (BR63), CCL2 (BR18), CCL3 (BR46), CCL4 (BR51), CCL5 (BR38), CCL22 (BR75) and CXCL10 (BR37). Data acquisition and analysis was performed using a Luminex MAGPIX platform with the xPONENT 4.3 program (R&D Systems). Data was reported only if measurable cytokine levels were detected in at least three mice/condition. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using unpaired two-tailed student’s t-test.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of mouse tumors was performed by HistoWiz Inc. (histowiz.com) using standard procedures and an automated workflow (27). Briefly, tumors were excised and immediately fixed with neutral-buffered 10% formalin for 24–48 h and then stored in PBS at 37°C. Samples were processed, embedded in paraffin and sectioned onto Superfrost Plus slides at 5 μM thickness. IHC was then performed on a Bond Rx autostainer (Leica Biosystems) with enzyme treatment (1:1000 dilution) using HistoWiz standard protocols. Antibodies used were rabbit monoclonal CD4 primary antibody (Abcam Cat# ab183685, RRID:AB_2686917, 1:500 dilution), rabbit monoclonal CD8a primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 98941, RRID:AB_2756376, 1:600 dilution) and rabbit anti-rat secondary (Vector Laboratories Cat# AI-4001, RRID:AB_2336209, 1:100 dilution). Bond Polymer Refine Detection was utilized following manufacturer’s protocol (Leica Biosystems). After staining was completed, tumor sections were dehydrated and coverslipped with film using a TissueTek-Prisma and Coverslipper (Sakura). Slide scanning was performed at 40x magnification on an Aperio AT2 (Leica Biosystems). Quantitative analysis of CD4 and CD8a positive staining was performed using the open-source digital image analyzer QuPath v0.4.3 (RRID:SCR_018257). Data was analyzed in GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798) using two-tailed unpaired student’s t-tests for statistical analysis.
Statistics
Statistical analyses of three or more treatment groups were performed using one-way ANOVA tests with Tukey’s correction to adjust for multiple comparisons unless otherwise noted. Statistical analyses between two groups were performed with unpaired 2-tailed student’s t-tests unless noted otherwise. ANOVA tests with Tukey’s correction and student’s t-tests were conducted using GraphPad Prism v10 (RRID:SCR_002798). For statistical analyses of murine tumor volumes, linear mixed modeling was employed to model longitudinal tumor volume for mice under each treatment. Comparisons were done at each time point and averaged across all time points using t-statistics. The Tukey-Kramer method was used for adjusting raw p-values for multiple comparisons across treatment groups.
Data Availability
All data generated during this study are available in the published article and its Supplementary data files or can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Results
IL-12 and trabectedin treatment increases NK-cell activation in vitro
While the NK-cell response to IL-12 has been extensively characterized, the direct effects of trabectedin on NK cells remain unknown. Human NK cells were isolated (purity gating in Supplementary Fig. S1A) and treated for 24 h in vitro with DMSO control, 10 ng/ml IL-12, 2.5 nM trabectedin or IL-12 and trabectedin, with dosing based on previous studies (28). NK-cell viability was unaffected by IL-12 and/or trabectedin (Fig. 1A), confirming that the myeloid cell–specific toxicity of trabectedin did not extend to NK cells. CD69 expression was measured as an initial marker of NK-cell activation. Trabectedin alone induced CD69 expression (p<0.001 vs control), and this was further increased when IL-12 and trabectedin were combined (p=0.005 vs control, Fig. 1B). Subsequently, the expression of several NK-cell activation and cytotoxicity genes were evaluated by RT-PCR. Trabectedin and IL-12 combined to induce the highest expression of IFN-γ (IFNG) and granzyme B (GZMB) in NK cells (all p<0.05 vs control, Fig. 1C), exceeding the level induced by either agent alone. Trabectedin alone significantly increased expression of T-BET (Tbx21), a transcription factor important for cytotoxicity (Fig. 1D), as well as cytotoxic ligands TRAIL (TNFSF10) and Fas ligand (FASLG) (Fig. 1E) and lymphotactin (XCL1) (Fig. 1F), a chemokine important for mediating dendritic cell (DC) migration (all p<0.05 vs control and IL-12). As STAT4 is a known mediator of IL-12-induced NK cell-signaling, STAT4 phosphorylation was measured in NK cells treated with IL-12, trabectedin or the combination (1). STAT4 phosphorylation was significantly increased in IL-12 treated NK cells compared to control treated NK cells (p=0.02, Supplementary Fig. 1B). Phospho-STAT4 levels were similar between IL-12 and combination treated NK cells (p=0.048 for combination vs control) while trabectedin alone had little effect. NK cells were then tested for cytotoxicity against K562 tumor cells (gating strategy for tumor cell lysis in Supplementary Fig. S1C). NK-cell cytotoxicity was significantly increased following IL-12 treatment (p=0.003 vs control, Fig. 1G). Although trabectedin alone had minimal effects, trabectedin in combination with IL-12 significantly increased NK-cell cytotoxicity (both p<0.03, Fig. 1G) and degranulation against K562 cells (both p<0.05, Supplementary Fig. S1D) compared to control and single-agent trabectedin. NK-cell cytotoxicity was then measured against human TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. Compared to control, IL-12 and IL-12 plus trabectedin significantly increased NK-cell cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-436 and MDA-MB-231 cells (both p<0.01, Fig. 1H and Supplementary Fig. S1E). IL-12 and IL-12 plus trabectedin also significantly increased NK-cell cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-468 cells compared to trabectedin alone (both p<0.05, Supplementary Fig. S1F). Single-agent trabectedin had little effect on NK-cell cytotoxicity against these cell lines however the lack of an inhibitory effect by trabectedin is notable and represents new information. Pre-treated NK cells cultured with MDA-MB-436 cells also had significantly higher CD69 expression, indicating increased activation in the presence of TNBC cells (p=0.002, Fig. 1I). This significant increase in activation was also seen with MDA-MB-231 cells (p=0.01, Fig. 1J). To evaluate NK-cell cytokine production, pre-treated NK cells were cultured with MDA-MB-436 cells for 24 h and supernatants were assayed. Combination treated NK cells produced significantly higher levels of IFN-γ (p=0.03, Fig. 1K), TNF-α (p=0.049, Fig. 1L) and granzyme B (p=0.01, Fig. 1M) than control treated NK cells. Taken together, these data suggest trabectedin has a direct stimulatory effect on NK cells and can be combined with IL-12 to activate NK cells in the presence of TNBC.
Figure 1. IL-12 and trabectedin treatment increases human NK cell activation in vitro.

(A) NK cell viability post-48 h treatment with DMSO (control), 10 ng/ml IL-12, 2.5 nM trabectedin or IL-12 plus trabectedin (n=5 donors). (B) Surface CD69 expression on NK cells after 24 h treatment. Values are mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (n=5 donors). mRNA expression of (C) IFNG, GZMB, (D) Tbx21, (E) TNFSF10, FASLG and (F) XCL1 in NK cells post-24 h treatment. Values show fold changes in mRNA expression compared to respective DMSO treated NK cells (n=3–6 donors). (G) K562 tumor cell lysis after a 4 h NK cell cytotoxicity assay (n=4 donors). (H) MDA-MB-436 tumor cell lysis after a 4 h NK cell cytotoxicity assay (n=4 donors). Statistical analyses were performed using RM one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Data represent mean ± SEM. Surface CD69 expression on NK cells following a 4 h co-culture with (I) MDA-MB-436 cells (n=4 donors) or (J) MDA-MB-231 cells (n=5 donors). Quantification of (K) IFN-γ (n=3 donors), (L) TNF-α (n=3 donors) and granzyme B (n=4 donors) secretion by pre-treated NK cells after 24 h co-culture with MDA-MB-436 cells. Statistical analyses were performed using paired student’s t-tests. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 ****p<0.0001.
Combination IL-12 and trabectedin reduces TNBC tumor burden in vivo
Given the role of trabectedin in reducing suppressive myeloid cells, and the role of IL-12 in stimulating NK cells, we hypothesized that these agents would combine effectively to control tumor burden in vivo. Also, the above experiments indicated that these two agents might have combinatorial effects on the NK-cell compartment in a murine model of TNBC. The 4T1 model of TNBC was employed to test this hypothesis as these tumors exhibits high levels of MDSC and impaired NK-cell immunity (29,30). 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were treated for 15 days with either PBS control, IL-12 thrice weekly, trabectedin once weekly or a combination of IL-12 and trabectedin at doses consistent with those employed in prior studies by our group (Fig. 2A) (23). The combination of IL-12 and trabectedin significantly reduced 4T1 tumor growth compared to single-agent IL-12 (p<0.0001) and single-agent trabectedin (p=0.0002, Fig. 2B and C). There was also one complete response in the IL-12 and trabectedin combination group. No significant changes in body weight were detected in any group during this time frame suggesting limited treatment-induced toxicity (Supplementary Fig. S2A and B). The EMT6 model of TNBC was used to confirm the efficacy of combination therapy. In mice bearing EMT6 tumors and receiving the same doses of IL-12 and/or trabectedin as the 4T1 tumor-bearing mice, tumor volume was significantly reduced with combination therapy compared to the single-agents or control (all p<0.0005, Fig. 2D). There were also 3 complete responses in the combination group. Circulating IFN-γ was measured in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice given the role of IFN-γ in mediating responses to IL-12 (2). Consistent with this concept, plasma IFN-γ levels were significantly higher in combination treated mice than in IL-12 treated mice (p<0.0001), while control and trabectedin treated mice had no measurable IFN-γ in circulation 72 h post-IL-12 administration (Fig. 2E). Splenic MDSC levels were also measured to evaluate effects on this immunosuppressive population (Fig. 2F). Both trabectedin and IL-12 plus trabectedin significantly reduced the percentage of MDSC compared to single-agent IL-12 and control treatments (all p<0.04, Fig. 2G). The total counts of MDSC and the PMN-MDSC and M-MDSC subsets were also significantly lower following treatment with trabectedin or IL-12 plus trabectedin (all p<0.05, Fig. 2H–2J).
Figure 2. Combination IL-12 and trabectedin effectively reduces triple-negative breast cancer tumor burden.

(A) General treatment schema for murine studies. PBS was used as a control. 0.5 ɥg IL-12 was given i.p. 3x/week and 0.15 mg/kg trabectedin was given intravenously (i.v.) 1x/week. (B) BALB/c mice were inoculated with 4T1 cells and divided into one of four treatment groups once tumors reached ~50 mm3 (PBS control (n=11), IL-12 (n=10), trabectedin (n=10) and IL-12 plus trabectedin (n=12)). Tumor growth was measured for 15 days. (C) Individual tumor growth curves for PBS control (n=11), IL-12 (n=10), trabectedin (n=10) and IL-12 plus trabectedin (n=12) treated mice. (D) Tumor growth curves of BALB/c mice inoculated with EMT6 cells and treated for 11 days as described in (A) (PBS control (n=7), IL-12 (n=5), trabectedin (n=7) and IL-12+trabectedin (n=6). (E) Plasma IFN-γ levels in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice at day 15 (n=7–9/treatment group). (F) Representative flow cytometry gating for M-MDSC and PMN-MDSC from splenocytes of control and IL-12 and trabectedin treated 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. (G) Percent MDSC in spleens of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice post-15-day treatment (n=3). (H) Absolute counts of total MDSC and M-MDSC and PMN-MDSC subsets in the spleens of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice post-15-day treatment (n=3). For statistical analyses of tumor volumes, linear mixed modeling was employed to model longitudinal tumor volume for mice under each treatment. Comparisons were done at each time point and averaged across all time points using t-statistics. The Tukey-Kramer method was used for adjusting raw p-values for multiple comparisons across treatment groups. An ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for statistical analysis of bar graphs. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 ****p<0.0001.
Combination IL-12 and trabectedin therapy reduces immunosuppressive myeloid cells while increasing intratumoral CD8+ T cells
To further investigate the immunologic effects of IL-12 and trabectedin therapy, mass cytometry was performed on the spleens and tumors of treated mice. A 30-antibody panel was developed to allow for evaluation of multiple immune populations, phenotypes and activation states (Supplementary Table S1 and S2). Representative UMAP plots from spleens of each treatment group are presented in Fig. 3A. These illustrate the overall decrease in MDSC and increase in T cells after trabectedin and combination IL-12 and trabectedin therapy. Trabectedin alone also induced an increase in splenic NK cells over IL-12 alone (p<0.05, Fig. 3B). Trabectedin (alone or with IL-12) led to significant increases in splenic CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell levels (both p<0.002 vs control and IL-12) without increasing regulatory T cells (Treg) (Fig. 3C). Coinciding with the increase in lymphocytes, overall macrophage levels were significantly reduced in spleens from trabectedin and combination treated mice (both p<0.05 vs control and IL-12, Fig. 3D). Notably, the proportion of MHCIIhi M1-like macrophages was significantly increased in both these groups (both p<0.002 vs control) while the proportion of CD206hi M2-like macrophages was significantly decreased (both p<0.001 vs control, Fig. 3E). These results suggest a selective reduction in immunosuppressive myeloid cells rather than pan-myelosuppression. Other populations such as conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1), myeloid dendritic cells (mDC), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) and B cells were not significantly changed with IL-12 and/or trabectedin (Fig. 3F, Supplementary Fig. S3A and B).
Figure 3. Combination IL-12 and trabectedin selectively reduces immunosuppressive myeloid cells while increasing intratumoral CD8+ T cells.

Mass cytometry analysis of splenic and tumor-infiltrating immune cells from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice treated with PBS control (n=7), IL-12 (n=6), trabectedin (n=6) and IL-12 plus trabectedin (n=4) for 15 days. (A) Representative Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plots of immune cell populations at day 15 in each treatment group clustered in an unsupervised manner from live/CD45+ splenocytes. Percentages of (B) NK cells (C) CD4+, CD8+ and T-regulatory cells out of total live/CD45+ splenocytes. (D) Percentage of total macrophages out of live/CD45+ splenocytes and (E) the proportions of M1-like and M2-like macrophages out of total macrophages. (F) Percentage of cDC1 cells out of live/CD45+ splenocytes. (G) Representative UMAPs of tumor-infiltrating immune cells from PBS control (n=3), IL-12 (n=4), trabectedin (n=3) and IL-12 plus trabectedin (n=3) treated mice clustered in an unsupervised manner from live/CD45+ cells. (H) Percentages of NK and (I) CD4+, CD8+ and T-regulatory cells out of live/CD45+ tumor-infiltrating cells. (J) Percentage of total macrophages out of live/CD45+ tumor-infiltrating cells and (K) proportion of M1 and M2 macrophages out of total macrophages. (L) Percentage of cDC1 cells out of live/CD45+ tumor-infiltrating cells. An ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for statistical analysis of bar graphs. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 ****p<0.0001.
Mass cytometry was also performed on tumors from these mice and representative UMAP plots are presented in Fig. 3G. PMN-MDSC, M-MDSC (Supplementary Fig. S3C), NK cell (Figure 3H), CD4+ T cell, Treg (Figure 3I) and macrophage (total, M1-like or M2-like) (Figure 3J, 3K) levels in the tumor did not significantly change with IL-12 and/or trabectedin, which is in contrast to the splenic results. However, the combination of IL-12 and trabectedin led to a significant increase in intratumoral CD8+ T cells (p=0.006 vs control, p=0.01 vs IL-12, Fig. 3I). The CD8+ T cells present in combination treated tumors also exhibited a significantly higher proportion of naïve (CD62L+CD44–) cells than any other treatment group (p=0.04 vs trabectedin, p=0.05 vs IL-12, p=0.07 vs control, Supplementary Fig. S3D), possibly indicative of a developing anticancer immune response (31). This was the only population significantly affected by combination therapy as mDC, pDC and B cells remained essentially unchanged (Supplementary Fig. S3E and F). There was an increase in cDC1s in combination treated tumors, although this did not reach significance (p=0.25 vs control, Fig. 3L). These results indicated that combination IL-12 and trabectedin led to a unique increase in intratumoral CD8+ T cells.
Digital spatial profiling suggests increased immune cell activation in combination treated tumors
Digital spatial profiling was employed to evaluate protein-level changes in the immune compartment of tumors from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice treated with control PBS, IL-12, trabectedin or IL-12 plus trabectedin. A schematic detailing the experimental workflow is shown in Fig. 4A. Representative fluorescently stained tumor images are shown in Fig. 4B and highlight the CD45+ immune cell (red), PanCK+ tumor cell (green) and SYTO13 nuclei staining (blue). Images are representative of one of three tumors analyzed per treatment group. Select ROIs are contained within the distinct boxes shown in Fig. 4B and identify areas chosen for further investigational profiling. Combination treated tumors consistently displayed areas of high-density immune cell staining in close proximity to tumor cells, which was not seen in any other treatment group. Several ROIs were chosen in these areas to better understand the immunological responses occurring. A representative ROI from each treatment group is shown in Fig. 2C at 20x magnification to highlight the distinct patterns in immune and tumor cell staining. Each ROI was segmented into CD45+ immune fractions and PanCK+ tumor fractions by manually selecting CD45 and PanCK fluorescence thresholds that visually maximized the individual cell types, allowing for evaluation of 71 protein targets expressed within each individual fraction (targets are listed in Supplementary Table S3). 12 ROIs were selected from each tumor, resulting in a total of 36 ROIs per treatment group used in the final analysis. Protein expression was quantitated within immune fractions of each ROI and differential expression analysis was performed between the four treatment groups. Within the immune compartment, there were 6 differentially expressed proteins between control and combination treated tumors, 21 differentially expressed proteins between IL-12 and combination treated tumors and 9 differentially expressed proteins between trabectedin and combination treated tumors (Fig. 4D–F, Supplementary Table S4A–C). Levels of Ki-67 (p<0.001), CD11c (p<0.01), CD40 (p=0.03), CD31 (p<0.001), SMA (p=0.01) and MET (p=0.04) were significantly lower in the CD45+ fractions of combination treated tumors compared to control treated tumors (Fig. 4D, Supplementary Table S4A). Compared to IL-12 treated tumors, combination treated tumors had significantly lower levels of several proteins in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways (all p<0.05), which could be due to the influence of tumor cells in the vicinity. Combination treated tumors also had significantly lower levels of CTLA-4 (p=0.002), an inhibitory molecule for DC–T cell interactions compared to IL-12 treated tumors (Fig. 4E, Supplementary Table S4B) (32). Combination treated tumors had significantly higher levels of NK/T cell cytotoxicity markers granzyme B and perforin (both p<0.04) and increased co-stimulatory molecule CD40L (p=0.056) compared to IL-12 treated tumors, suggesting increased intratumoral immune cell activation when trabectedin was added to IL-12 (Fig. 4E, Supplementary Table S4B). Finally, compared to trabectedin alone, combination treated tumors had significantly higher levels of the T-cell markers CD3e and CD8a (p=0.04 and p<0.0001, respectively) and checkpoint molecules PD-1 and LAG3 (both p<0.04), the latter of which is associated with improved overall and relapse-free survival in TNBC (33). The cDC1-required transcription factor BATF3 and ICOS, a costimulatory molecule implicated in T-cell activation and differentiation, were also significantly elevated (both p<0.5, Fig. 4F, Supplementary Table S4C) (34,35). A heatmap showing the expression levels of all 71 proteins is shown in Supplementary Fig. S4. In all four treatment groups, there was low expression of the B-cell marker CD19, and CD4+ T-cell marker/Treg markers CD4 and FOXP3, mirroring what was seen by intratumoral mass cytometry (Supplementary Fig. S4).
Figure 4. Digital spatial profiling reveals areas of enhanced and activated immune cell infiltration in combination-treated tumors.

(A) Schematic detailing the digital spatial profiling workflow. 4T1 tumors were harvested mice treated for 15 days with PBS control, IL-12, trabectedin or IL-12 plus trabectedin and sectioned into formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue slides. (B) Representative images of tumor slides immunofluorescently stained with an antibody mix for nuclei (SYTO13, blue), immune cells (CD45, red) and tumor cells (PanCK, green). Rectangular boxes represent areas selected as regions of interest (ROI). (C) Representative ROIs chosen from each treatment group magnified at 20x. Volcano plots of differentially expressed proteins in CD45+ fractions of ROIs between (D) control and IL-12 plus trabectedin (IL-12/trab) treated tumors, (E) IL-12 and IL-12/trab treated tumors and (F) trabectedin and IL-12/trab treated tumors. Red colored points indicate a protein with higher expression in IL-12/trab treated tumors compared to control or single-agent treated tumors. Statistical analysis of differential protein expression between treatment groups was determined using a linear mixed model followed by p-value correction using Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) procedure. Adjusted p-values <0.05 were considered significant.
NK-cell depletion reduces combination efficacy, chemokine secretion and intratumoral CD8+ T cells
Based on the role of NK cells in IL-12 therapy and the increased cytotoxic/activation markers detected by digital spatial profiling, we investigated how NK cells may be contributing to the efficacy of IL-12 and trabectedin therapy. To test this, antibody-mediated NK-cell depletion was performed using an anti-asialo-GM1 prior to IL-12 and trabectedin administration. The efficiency of NK-cell depletion was >85% as confirmed by flow cytometric analysis of splenocytes (Supplementary Fig. 5A). No significant differences were detected in CD3+ T cells following administration of anti-asialo-GM1 (Supplementary Fig. 5B). NK-cell depletion significantly reduced the efficacy of combination therapy. as evidenced by the significant increase in tumor growth and final volumes (p<0.001, Fig. 5A and B, Supplementary Fig. S6). This result suggested an essential role of NK cells in the efficacy of IL-12 and trabectedin therapy. NK-cell depletion impacted downstream immune responses induced by combination therapy as evidenced by alterations in cytokine and chemokine levels (Fig. 5C). Circulating levels of CCL5, an NK cell–derived chemokine, were significantly reduced with NK-cell depletion (p<0.01, Fig. 5C). Circulating levels of the DC-derived chemokine CXCL10 were also significantly reduced with NK-cell depletion (p<0.01, Fig. 5C). In contrast, levels of TNF-α and CCL3 were significantly increased in the context of NK-cell depletion (both p<0.01, Fig. 5C). Levels of GM-CSF, granzyme B, CCL2 and CCL4 were below the limit of detection at this timepoint in both treatment groups, and levels of IFN-γ and CCL22 levels were not significantly altered upon NK-cell depletion. Based on the previously described roles of NK cell–derived CCL5 and DC-derived CXCL10 in recruiting immune cells, we investigated whether NK-cell depletion might affect the levels of intratumoral CD8+ T cells in combination treated mice (34). CD8a+ cells were significantly reduced in the tumors of combination treated mice that had been depleted of NK cells (p=0.001, Fig. 5D and E). On the other hand, levels of CD4+ cells did not change with NK-cell depletion, again suggesting a specific effect on intratumoral CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5D and E).
Figure 5. NK-cell depletion reduces combination-induced efficacy and reduces intratumoral CD8a.

BALB/c mice were inoculated with 4T1 cells and divided into one of two groups once tumors reached ~50 mm3. Mice were either depleted of NK cells using anti-asialo-GM1 antibody or treated with an IgG isotype control antibody. Anti-asialo-GM1 was administered by i.p. injection at 100 ɥg/100 ɥL three days prior to the start of IL-12 and trabectedin treatment and every four days thereafter. The IgG isotype control antibody was administered in non-depleted mice at the same timepoints and dose as the depletion antibody. NK depleted mice were treated with PBS control (n=6) or i.p. injection of 0.5 ɥg IL-12 3x/week and i.v. injection of 0.15 mg/kg trabectedin 1x/week (n=5). Non-depleted mice were similarly treated with either PBS control (n=8) or IL-12 plus trabectedin (n=6). (A) Tumor growth curves throughout the 12-day treatment. (B) Images of tumors post-excision. For statistical analyses of tumor volumes, linear mixed modeling was employed to model longitudinal tumor volume for mice under each treatment. Comparisons were done at each time point and averaged across all time points using t-statistics. The Tukey-Kramer method was used for adjusting raw p-values for multiple comparisons across treatment groups. Values are the mean ± SEM of tumor volumes at each time point. (C) Plasma cytokine and chemokine levels in mice at day 19. Values represent individual samples ± SEM. (D) Representative images (5x magnification) of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for CD8a and CD4 performed on 4T1 tumors from mice treated with IL-12 and trabectedin ± NK cell depletion. (E) Quantification of IHC staining as reported by %CD8a (n=4–5) and %CD4 (n=3–5) positivity/slide. Values represent individual tumor slides and are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses of bar graphs were performed using two-tailed unpaired student’s t-tests. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 ****p<0.0001.
CD8+ T-cell depletion also reduces combination-induced efficacy
To determine if CD8+ T cells played a role in the efficacy of combination therapy, a CD8 depletion study was performed. Mice were treated with the combination of IL-12 and trabectedin following CD8+ T-cell depletion or control treatment. The efficiency of CD8+ T-cell depletion was >99% (Supplementary Fig. S7). The efficacy of combination therapy was significantly reduced in the context of CD8 T-cell depletion (p=0.002, Fig. 6A). Tumor growth and overall volumes were significantly higher in mice depleted of CD8+ T cells prior to treatment (Fig. 6B and C). Thus, the efficacy of IL-12 and trabectedin therapy appears to rely on both the CD8+ T-cell and NK-cell compartments. CD8+ T-cell depletion significantly reduced levels of IFN-γ induced by combination therapy, unlike what was seen with NK-cell depletion (p=0.02, Fig. 6D). Levels of TNF-α and chemokines did not change with CD8 T-cell depletion (Fig. 6D).
Figure 6. CD8a depletion abrogates IL-12/trabectedin-induced tumor control.

BALB/c mice were inoculated with 4T1 cells. Once tumors reached ~50 mm3, mice were either depleted of CD8a+ cells using α-CD8a antibody (n=7) or treated with an IgG isotype control antibody (n=6). CD8a+ depletion was performed through i.p. injection of an α-CD8 antibody one day prior to the start of IL-12 and trabectedin treatment (at a dose of 200 μg) and every four days thereafter (at a dose of 100 μg). Non-depleted mice were treated with the same dose of control antibody at the same timepoints. Both groups were treated with 0.5 ɥg IL-12 i.p. 3x/week and 0.15 mg/kg trabectedin i.v. 1x/week. (A) Tumor growth curves throughout the 8-day treatment. (B) Tumor images post-excision. (C) Individual tumor growth curves for IL-12 and trabectedin + IgG treated mice and IL-12 and trabectedin + αCD8 treated mice. (D) Plasma cytokine and chemokine levels in mice (n=4–6) at day 16. For statistical analyses of tumor volumes, linear mixed modeling was employed to model longitudinal tumor volume for mice under each treatment. Comparisons were done at each time point and averaged across all time points using t-statistics. The Tukey-Kramer method was used for adjusting raw p-values for multiple comparisons across treatment groups. Statistical analyses of bar graphs were performed using two-tailed unpaired student’s t-tests. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Combination IL-12 and trabectedin therapy enhances immune-checkpoint blockade
After confirming that CD8+ T cells played a significant role in combination efficacy, we sought to determine whether treatment with IL-12 and trabectedin could further enhance the immune response to an inhibitor of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint. Mice bearing 4T1 tumors were treated with either an anti-PD-L1, IL-12 plus trabectedin, or IL-12 plus trabectedin with anti-PD-L1. Single-agent anti-PD-L1 had little effect on tumor growth, whereas treatment with IL-12 and trabectedin led to the expected significant decrease in tumor growth (p=0.002, Fig. 7A and B). However, the combination of IL-12 and trabectedin with an anti-PD-L1 significantly reduced tumor growth and volumes beyond that achieved with IL-12 and trabectedin therapy alone and led to one complete response (p=0.03, Fig. 7A–C). The addition of anti-PD-L1 to IL-12 and trabectedin therapy also significantly increased circulating levels of IFN-γ (p<0.0001, Fig. 7D). As the immune stimulating effects of anti-PD-L1 therapy are seen predominantly in T and NK cells, changes in these populations were assessed after treatment. IL-12 and trabectedin therapy increased the percentages of splenic NK cells, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells compared to anti-PD-L1 therapy alone (Fig. 7E–G). Levels of CD69+ within NK cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were also significantly increased with IL-12 and trabectedin therapy compared to anti-PD-L1 (all p<0.01, Fig. 7E–G). The addition of anti-PD-L1 therapy to IL-12 and trabectedin led to decreased levels of total and CD69+ NK cells (Fig. 7E) but increased the proportion of CD8+ T cells with an effector phenotype (p=0.001, Fig. 7H). This triple combination also significantly decreased the proportion of naïve and central memory CD8+ T cells as well as Treg compared to IL-12 and trabectedin alone (all p<0.05, Supplementary Fig. S8A and B). Total MDSC levels were further decreased with the addition of anti-PD-L1 therapy to IL-12 and trabectedin and the proportion of M1-like macrophages was further increased (Figure 7I, Supplementary Fig. S8C).
Figure 7. Anti-PD-L1 therapy improves response to combination IL-12 and trabectedin treatment.

Mice bearing ~50 mm3 4T1 tumors were treated with 0.5 ɥg IL-12 i.p. 3x/week and 0.15 mg/kg trabectedin i.v. 1x/week for 7 days with either αPD-L1 therapy (100 μg 3x/week, n=5) or isotype control IgG (100 μg 3x/week, n=6). (A) Tumor growth curves throughout treatment. (B) Tumor images post-excision. One mouse from the triple combination group had a complete response and therefore had no tumor for imaging. For statistical analyses of tumor volumes, linear mixed modeling was employed to model longitudinal tumor volume for mice under each treatment. Comparisons were done at each time point and averaged across all time points using t-statistics. The Tukey-Kramer method was used for adjusting raw p-values for multiple comparisons across treatment groups. (C) Individual tumor growth curves for PBS + αPD-L1, IL-12 and trabectedin + IgG and IL-12 and trabectedin + αPD-L1 treated mice. (D) Plasma levels of IFN-γ in mice treated with IL-12 and trabectedin + IgG or αPD-L1 at day 15 (n=3–5). Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed unpaired student’s t-tests. (E-H) Percentages of splenic immune cells at day 15. An ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for statistical analyses of mass cytometry data. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 ****p<0.0001. (J) Proposed mechanism of IL-12 and trabectedin-induced anti-tumor immunity. Trabectedin reduced inhibitory immune cells (MDSC and TAMs) in mice bearing TNBC tumors. Without the presence of a highly immunosuppressive TME, trabectedin and/or IL-12 may be able to activate NK cells and lead to increased CCL5 and XCL1 production. CCL5 and XCL1 can attract CXCL10-producing cDC1 into the TME, where these cells can cross-present antigen to CD8+ T cells and promote an improved anti-tumor response.
Discussion
Previous work has described the essential role of NK cells in clinical responses to IL-12 therapy (18). However, immunosuppressive cells such as MDSC can inhibit IL-12-induced NK-cell activation and may therefore represent a barrier to beneficial responses (14). The present study utilized trabectedin as an immunosuppressive myeloid cell–depleting agent to investigate whether removing this barrier to response prior to IL-12 administration could improve its antitumor activity. TNBC was chosen as the setting to test this combination due to the high MDSC levels, presence of tumor-induced NK-cell dysfunction and lack of targeted treatment options (15,16). In this study, the addition of trabectedin to IL-12 therapy led to significantly higher tumor regression in both 4T1 and EMT6 models of TNBC than single-agent controls. Significant reductions in splenic MDSC and M2-like but not M1-like macrophages post-treatment supported the ability of trabectedin to reduce suppressive myeloid cells in this model. The ability of this combination to sensitize 4T1 tumors to anti-PD-L1 therapy also signifies its potential application to immune-based treatments, in general. As a single agent, trabectedin led to a significant increase in CD69 expression and T-BET (Tbx21), TRAIL (TNFSF10), fas ligand (FASLG) and lymphotactin (XCL1) mRNA expression in NK cells. In the presence of human TNBC cells, IL-12 and trabectedin significantly increased NK-cell cytotoxicity, activation and IFN-γ, TNF-α and granzyme B secretion. Collectively, these results indicate an antitumor effect of trabectedin when combined with IL-12 in TNBC.
Mechanistically, this study suggests that trabectedin and IL-12 therapy may stimulate NK cells in vivo to secrete immune-mediating chemokines CCL5 and XCL1. These factors can attract CXCL10-producing cDC1 into the TME, ultimately leading to increased intratumoral CD8+ T cells and improved antitumor responses (Fig. 7J). This hypothesis is supported by the decrease in trabectedin and IL-12 antitumor efficacy when NK cells were depleted. The concurrent significant decrease in CCL5 and CXCL10 following NK-cell depletion suggests trabectedin and IL-12 may be stimulating NK-cell induction of these immune-mediating chemokines. NK cells have been shown to be the main producers of intratumoral CCL5 and XCL1 in solid tumors (34). Of note, the in vitro treatment of NK cells with trabectedin significantly increased XCL1 mRNA expression. XCL1 and CCL5 are crucial chemokines in antitumor immunity due to their ability to recruit XCR1+ cDC1s into the TME (36). Intratumoral accumulation of cDC1s has been shown to be dependent on NK cell–derived CCL5 and XCL1 and cDC1 have also been shown to be one of the main producers of the T cell–attracting chemokine CXCL10 (34). The ability of cDC1 to cross-present antigens to CD8+ T cells within the TME uniquely enables them to elicit antitumor immune responses (36). In the present model, combination treated tumors had increased levels of cDC1 and CD8+ T cells. The preponderance of naïve-like CD8+ T cells suggests that this DC–T cell interplay may play a part in mediating the IL-12 and trabectedin-induced antitumor immune response. The high expression of the cDC1-required transcription factors BATF3 and CD8a in combination treated tumors also supports the involvement of cDC1s.
Additional studies exploring the interplay between NK cells, cDC1 and CD8+ T cells suggest this axis may contribute to antitumor efficacy (34). Böttcher et al. analyzed TCGA data and found that a cDC1 signature was positively correlated with an XCL1/XCL2 and CCL5 chemokine signature and an NK-cell signature in breast cancer, melanoma, and lung adenocarcinoma (34). When analyzing TNBC samples, this group found a significant positive association between cDC1 and NK cell signature genes and patient survival. This suggests that this NK/cDC1/T cell axis may contribute to antitumor efficacy in TNBC. Image-based deep learning has also shown intratumoral clustering of cDC1 and CD8+ T cells acts as a feature of protective anticancer immunity through the intratumoral cross-presentation of tumor antigens and subsequent CD8+ T-cell differentiation and expansion (37). Several groups have found that intratumoral cDC1 are associated with increased CD8+ T cells in the TME and increased immunotherapeutic success (38,39). This is congruent with our finding that IL-12 and trabectedin could sensitize 4T1 tumors to anti-PD-L1 therapy and that this triple combination could induce higher tumor regression than IL-12 and trabectedin alone. The finding that NK-cell depletion also significantly reduced intratumoral CD8+ T cells supports this notion. However, follow-up studies will be needed to confirm the reliance of IL-12 and trabectedin therapy on an NK/cDC1/T cell axis.
The preclinical efficacy of trabectedin has been shown in several tumor models such as sarcoma and multiple myeloma (23,28). As in our model, trabectedin was found to deplete MDSC and M2-like but not M1-like macrophages in a murine model of Ewing sarcoma (23). The combination of trabectedin and oncolytic herpes virus (oHSV) also led to tumor regression in Ewing sarcoma, suggesting the addition of an immune-stimulating agent to trabectedin may be an effective therapeutic strategy in solid tumors (23). In an immunocompetent model of osteosarcoma, the combination of trabectedin and oHSV was also effective with antitumor efficacy being mediated by NK and CD8+ T cells (40). Single-agent trabectedin induced mRNA expression of IFNG and GZMB in CD8+ T cells from chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated in vitro, which aligns with our findings in NK cells (41). Additionally, the findings by Cucé et al. and Allavena et al. that trabectedin leads to increased tumor cell NKG2D ligand expression and inhibits transcription of cytokines linked to NK-cell dysfunction, such as IL-6, suggests trabectedin may indirectly activate NK cells in the setting of cancer (21,28). The ability of trabectedin to induce NK-cell activation and transcription of T-BET, IFN-γ and granzyme B suggests a potential direct mechanism of NK-cell stimulation that bears further investigation. However, phospho-STAT4 levels were similar between IL-12 and combination treated NK cells, suggesting that trabectedin was not exerting an effect on this IL-12 signaling pathway. Thus, the pathway through which trabectedin is acting on NK cells remains to be elucidated.
The observation that trabectedin binds to DNA and prevents effective DNA repair led to the finding that tumors lacking functional BRCA2 were hypersensitive to trabectedin-induced apoptosis. This resulted in several clinical trials investigating trabectedin for the treatment of breast cancer (42,43). A phase II study of trabectedin in patients with advanced, pretreated breast cancer having received at least one regimen of taxanes or anthracyclines, resulted in an overall response rate of 14% with 3 of 21 patients achieving a partial response (42). Another phase II study of trabectedin monotherapy was conducted in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients harboring a germline mutation in BRCA1/2 (43). Clinical responses were higher in this patient population with 6 partial responses. Trabectedin monotherapy in the TNBC cohort led to unconfirmed partial responses in 2 of 43 patients (44). The existence of high levels of chemotherapeutic resistance in the triple-negative subtype could represent a reason for the reduced effectiveness of trabectedin monotherapy in this setting (10). The addition of trabectedin to an immune-based therapy may represent a promising new treatment strategy in this patient population.
Other studies have suggested that combining trabectedin with immune-stimulating agents may improve antitumor efficacy. For example, a preclinical study found pre-treatment with trabectedin improved the response to anti-PD-1 in a murine model of fibrosarcoma and led to upregulation of CD8, GZMB, PRF1 and CXCL10 mRNA expression in trabectedin-treated tumors (45). Several clinical trials have also tested trabectedin with various immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as durvalumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (46–49). The best overall response rate was 25.3% in a study that evaluated trabectedin with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (49). These results suggest that trabectedin could have a role as an adjunct to immunologic therapy in specific settings. Investigating the efficacy of IL-12 and trabectedin in other solid tumor types is an important future direction of this study. However, thorough monitoring of adverse events when combining two immune-stimulating agents in patients is imperative. Investigating whether an intratumoral dose of IL-12 could provide the same antitumor effect with less side-effects is an important future direction. While pre-treatment with corticosteroids have been shown to reduce trabectedin-induced hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression, this approach could inhibit IL-12-induced immune responses (50).
In summary, this study provides preclinical evidence for the efficacy of IL-12 and trabectedin therapy in the treatment of TNBC. The in vitro findings suggest that there may be a previously undescribed role for trabectedin in the activation of NK cells and a potential for increased activation when combined with IL-12. The finding that this combination further sensitized 4T1 tumors to anti-PD-L1 therapy supports additional studies combining IL-12 and trabectedin therapy with ICIs.
Supplementary Material
Synopsis.
TNBC is associated with a poor prognosis. The authors show that adding trabectedin to IL12 is effective in murine TNBC models as it augments the effects of IL12-activated NK cells, suggesting new potential treatment options for TNBC.
Acknowledgements
Research reported in this publication was supported by The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and the National Institutes of Health under grant numbers P30 CA016058, U54-CA232561–01A1, UM1CA186712, T32CA090223, F31CA278353, and T32CA269052 and T32TR004543. Dr. Carson’s research is supported by The John B. and Jane T. McCoy Chair in Cancer Research Endowment. We thank the Clinical Translational Science Shared Resource at The Ohio State University and the Flow Cytometry Shared Resource at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center for their services.
Financial Support:
NCI grants UM1CA186712, T32CA090223, U54CA232561–01A1, F31CA278353 and P30 CA016058 (to W.E. Carson), NIH grants T32TR004543 (to E. Schwarz) and T32CA269052 (to E. Ringwalt)
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Tugues S, Burkhard SH, Ohs I, Vrohlings M, Nussbaum K, vom Berg J, et al. New insights into IL-12-mediated tumor suppression. Cell Death Differ [Internet]. 2015;22:237–46. Available from: 10.1038/cdd.2014.134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bekaii-Saab TS, Roda JM, Guenterberg KD, Ramaswamy B, Young DC, Ferketich AK, et al. A phase I trial of paclitaxel and trastuzumab in combination with interleukin-12 in patients with HER2/neu-expressing malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:2983–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nguyen KG, Vrabel MR, Mantooth SM, Hopkins JJ, Wagner ES, Gabaldon TA, et al. Localized Interleukin-12 for Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2020;11:575597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schwarz E, Carson WE 3rd. Analysis of potential biomarkers of response to IL-12 therapy. J Leukoc Biol. United States; 2022; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parihar R, Nadella P, Lewis A, Jensen R, De Hoff C, Dierksheide JE, et al. A Phase I Study of Interleukin 12 with Trastuzumab in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Overexpressing Malignancies. Clin Cancer Res [Internet]. 2004;10:5027 LP – 5037. Available from: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/10/15/5027.abstract [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schwarz E, Benner B, Yu L, Tounkara F, Carson WE 3rd. Analysis of Changes in Plasma Cytokine Levels in Response to IL12 Therapy in Three Clinical Trials. Cancer Res Commun United States; 2024;4:81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yao L, Sgadari C, Furuke K, Bloom ET, Teruya-Feldstein J, Tosato G. Contribution of natural killer cells to inhibition of angiogenesis by interleukin-12. Blood. United States; 1999;93:1612–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zheng H, Siddharth S, Parida S, Wu X, Sharma D. Tumor Microenvironment: Key Players in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Immunomodulation. Cancers (Basel). Switzerland; 2021;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bou Zerdan M, Ghorayeb T, Saliba F, Allam S, Bou Zerdan M, Yaghi M, et al. Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Updates on Classification and Treatment in 2021. Cancers (Basel). Switzerland; 2022;14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li Y, Zhang H, Merkher Y, Chen L, Liu N, Leonov S, et al. Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. J Hematol Oncol [Internet]. 2022;15:121. Available from: 10.1186/s13045-022-01341-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siegel SD, Brooks MM, Lynch SM, Sims-Mourtada J, Schug ZT, Curriero FC. Racial disparities in triple negative breast cancer: toward a causal architecture approach. Breast Cancer Res [Internet]. 2022;24:37. Available from: 10.1186/s13058-022-01533-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wesolowski R, Markowitz J, Carson WE. Myeloid derived suppressor cells – a new therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer. J Immunother Cancer [Internet]. 2013;1:10. Available from: 10.1186/2051-1426-1-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kumar S, Wilkes DW, Samuel N, Blanco MA, Nayak A, Alicea-Torres K, et al. ΔNp63-driven recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells promotes metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:5095–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jing R, Bai S, Zhang P, Ren H, Jia L, Li W, et al. IDO-1 impairs antitumor immunity of natural killer cells in triple-negative breast cancer via up-regulation of HLA-G. Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2024;31:135–47. Available from: 10.1007/s12282-023-01522-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stiff A, Trikha P, Mundy-Bosse B, McMichael E, Mace TA, Benner B, et al. Nitric Oxide Production by Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Plays a Role in Impairing Fc Receptor-Mediated Natural Killer Cell Function. Clin cancer Res an Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2018;24:1891–904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sarhan D, Cichocki F, Zhang B, Yingst A, Spellman SR, Cooley S, et al. Adaptive NK Cells with Low TIGIT Expression Are Inherently Resistant to Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Res. United States; 2016;76:5696–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. NIH Public Access; 2009;9:162–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McMichael EL, Benner B, Atwal LS, Courtney NB, Mo X, Davis ME, et al. A Phase I/II Trial of Cetuximab in Combination with Interleukin-12 Administered to Patients with Unresectable Primary or Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res [Internet]. 2019;25:4955 LP – 4965. Available from: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/25/16/4955.abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bottai G, Raschioni C, Székely B, Di Tommaso L, Szász AM, Losurdo A, et al. AXL-associated tumor inflammation as a poor prognostic signature in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer patients. npj Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2016;2:16033. Available from: 10.1038/npjbcancer.2016.33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Germano G, Frapolli R, Belgiovine C, Anselmo A, Pesce S, Liguori M, et al. Role of macrophage targeting in the antitumor activity of trabectedin. Cancer Cell United States; 2013;23:249–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Allavena P, Belgiovine C, Digifico E, Frapolli R, D’Incalci M. Effects of the Anti-Tumor Agents Trabectedin and Lurbinectedin on Immune Cells of the Tumor Microenvironment. Front Oncol. Switzerland; 2022;12:851790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ratti C, Botti L, Cancila V, Galvan S, Torselli I, Garofalo C, et al. Trabectedin Overrides Osteosarcoma Differentiative Block and Reprograms the Tumor Immune Environment Enabling Effective Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res [Internet]. 2017;23:5149–61. Available from: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Denton NL, Chen C-Y, Hutzen B, Currier MA, Scott T, Nartker B, et al. Myelolytic Treatments Enhance Oncolytic Herpes Virotherapy in Models of Ewing Sarcoma by Modulating the Immune Microenvironment. Mol Ther oncolytics. 2018;11:62–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carson WE, Yu H, Dierksheide J, Pfeffer K, Bouchard P, Clark R, et al. A fatal cytokine-induced systemic inflammatory response reveals a critical role for NK cells. J Immunol. United States; 1999;162:4943–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Canella A, Nazzaro M, Rajendran S, Schmitt C, Haffey A, Nigita G, et al. Genetically modified IL2 bone-marrow-derived myeloid cells reprogram the glioma immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Cell Rep [Internet]. 2023;42:112891. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124723009026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Westfall JJ, Schwind WN, Sran S, Navarro JB, Leonard J, Pindrik JA, et al. Molecular and spatial heterogeneity of microglia in Rasmussen encephalitis. Acta Neuropathol Commun. England; 2022;10:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dantas E, Murthy A, Ahmed T, Ahmed M, Ramsamooj S, Hurd MA, et al. TIMP1 is an early biomarker for detection and prognosis of lung cancer. Clin Transl Med. United States; 2023;13:e1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cucè M, Gallo Cantafio ME, Siciliano MA, Riillo C, Caracciolo D, Scionti F, et al. Trabectedin triggers direct and NK-mediated cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol [Internet]. 2019;12:32. Available from: 10.1186/s13045-019-0714-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ouzounova M, Lee E, Piranlioglu R, El Andaloussi A, Kolhe R, Demirci MF, et al. Monocytic and granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells differentially regulate spatiotemporal tumour plasticity during metastatic cascade. Nat Commun England; 2017;8:14979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Richards JO, Chang X, Blaser BW, Caligiuri MA, Zheng P, Liu Y. Tumor growth impedes natural-killer-cell maturation in the bone marrow. Blood [Internet]. 2006;108:246–52. Available from: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thompson ED, Enriquez HL, Fu Y-X, Engelhard VH. Tumor masses support naive T cell infiltration, activation, and differentiation into effectors. J Exp Med. United States; 2010;207:1791–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Van Coillie S, Wiernicki B, Xu J. Molecular and Cellular Functions of CTLA-4. Adv Exp Med Biol. United States; 2020;1248:7–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stovgaard ES, Kümler I, List-Jensen K, Roslind A, Christensen IJ, Høgdall E, et al. Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of LAG-3 Expression in Triple-negative Breast Cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol AIMM. United States; 2022;30:62–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Böttcher JP, Bonavita E, Chakravarty P, Blees H, Cabeza-Cabrerizo M, Sammicheli S, et al. NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of cDC1 into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control. Cell. United States; 2018;172:1022–1037.e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dong C, Juedes AE, Temann U-A, Shresta S, Allison JP, Ruddle NH, et al. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function . Nature [Internet]. 2001;409:97–101. Available from: 10.1038/35051100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Heger L, Hatscher L, Liang C, Lehmann CHK, Amon L, Lühr JJ, et al. XCR1 expression distinguishes human conventional dendritic cell type 1 with full effector functions from their immediate precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. United States; 2023;120:e2300343120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Meiser P, Knolle MA, Hirschberger A, de Almeida GP, Bayerl F, Lacher S, et al. A distinct stimulatory cDC1 subpopulation amplifies CD8(+) T cell responses in tumors for protective anti-cancer immunity. Cancer Cell. United States; 2023;41:1498–1515.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barry KC, Hsu J, Broz ML, Cueto FJ, Binnewies M, Combes AJ, et al. A natural killer–dendritic cell axis defines checkpoint therapy–responsive tumor microenvironments. Nat Med [Internet]. 2018;24:1178–91. Available from: 10.1038/s41591-018-0085-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fu C, Jiang A. Dendritic Cells and CD8 T Cell Immunity in Tumor Microenvironment. Front Immunol. Switzerland; 2018;9:3059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ringwalt EM, Currier MA, Glaspell AM, Chen C-Y, Cannon MV, Cam M, et al. Trabectedin promotes oncolytic virus antitumor efficacy, viral gene expression, and immune effector function in models of bone sarcoma. Mol Ther Oncol. United States; 2024;32:200886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Banerjee P, Zhang R, Ivan C, Galletti G, Clise-Dwyer K, Barbaglio F, et al. Trabectedin Reveals a Strategy of Immunomodulation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Cancer Immunol Res [Internet]. 2019;7:2036 LP – 2051. Available from: http://cancerimmunolres.aacrjournals.org/content/7/12/2036.abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zelek L, Yovine A, Brain E, Turpin F, Taamma A, Riofrio M, et al. A phase II study of Yondelis® (trabectedin, ET-743) as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion in pretreated advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer [Internet]. 2006;94:1610–4. Available from: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Delaloge S, Wolp-Diniz R, Byrski T, Blum JL, Gonçalves A, Campone M, et al. Activity of trabectedin in germline BRCA1/2-mutated metastatic breast cancer: results of an international first-in-class phase II study. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2014;25:1152–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419365871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Blum JL, Gonçalves A, Efrat N, Debled M, Conte P, Richards PD, et al. A phase II trial of trabectedin in triple-negative and HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Netherlands; 2016;155:295–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Belgiovine C, Frapolli R, Liguori M, Digifico E, Colombo FS, Meroni M, et al. Inhibition of tumor-associated macrophages by trabectedin improves the antitumor adaptive immunity in response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Immunol. Germany; 2021;51:2677–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chawla SP, Tellez WA, Chomoyan H, Valencia C, Ahari A, Omelchenko N, et al. Activity of TNT: a phase 2 study using talimogene laherparepvec, nivolumab and trabectedin for previously treated patients with advanced sarcomas (NCT# 03886311). Front Oncol. Switzerland; 2023;13:1116937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Toulmonde M, Brahmi M, Giraud A, Chakiba C, Bessede A, Kind M, et al. Trabectedin plus Durvalumab in Patients with Advanced Pretreated Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Ovarian Carcinoma (TRAMUNE): An Open-Label, Multicenter Phase Ib Study. Clin Cancer Res [Internet]. 2022;28:1765–72. Available from: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chawla SP, Sankhala K, Ravicz J, Kang G, Liu S, Stumpf N, et al. Clinical experience with combination chemo-/immunotherapy using trabectedin and nivolumab for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Sarcoma Res. 2018;2:1009. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gordon EM, Chawla SP, Tellez WA, Younesi E, Thomas S, Chua-Alcala VS, et al. SAINT: A Phase I/Expanded Phase II Study Using Safe Amounts of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Trabectedin as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Cancers (Basel). Switzerland; 2023;15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Paz-Ares L, López-Pousa A, Poveda A, Balañá C, Ciruelos E, Bellmunt J, et al. Trabectedin in pre-treated patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study evaluating co-treatment with dexamethasone. Invest New Drugs. United States; 2012;30:729–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated during this study are available in the published article and its Supplementary data files or can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
