Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Apr 2;20(4):e0320180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320180

The impact of environmental enrichment on energy metabolism in ovariectomized mice

Chaoran Ju 1, Ayano Ogura 1,2, Yoshikazu Hayashi 3,4,5, Yuko Kawabata 6, Fulvio D’Acquisto 7,8, Tomoyo Kawakubo-Yasukochi 3,*, Eijiro Jimi 1,3,*
Editor: Andre van Wijnen9
PMCID: PMC11964458  PMID: 40173406

Abstract

After menopause, a decline in ovarian function leads to various physical and psychological changes, potentially resulting in a range of pathological conditions, including abnormalities in energy metabolism. In recent years, environmental enrichment, which is characterized by positive and comfortable eustress, has been shown to improve various physiological and pathological conditions. This study investigated the effects of environmental factors on energy metabolism in a menopause model using an ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model. Wild-type female mice (8-week-old) were subjected to OVX or a sham operation and maintained under standard condition (SC), enriched environment (EE), or isolated (IS) condition for 4 weeks. OVX led to weight gain and disruption of circadian rhythms, along with changes in various metabolic parameters influenced by differences in housing environments; i.e., EE improved metabolic parameters, but IS deteriorated them. Physical activity and social interaction were factors that determined these differences. Menopause is usually a significant transitional period in a woman’s life, and changes in the social environment during this period can contribute to a diverse range of physical and psychological symptoms. Consequently, when implementing interventions to alleviate menopause-related pathological conditions, not only physical symptoms but also the social context should be carefully considered.

Introduction

It has been suggested that the living environment may affect not only the physiological status [1] but also the progression of diseases [2], although environmental enrichment in humans remains controversial and is difficult to analyze in detail because there is no standardized environment. In laboratory animals, a housing environment that includes social interaction and physical exercise in space use is called environmental enrichment, and it has been reported to be effective in eliciting animals’ innate behavior and improving behavior [3], neurological functions [3], energy metabolism [4], and cancer progression [4,5]. Therefore, the living environment has been recognized as a research subject [3].

Along with the changing social structure, households are becoming smaller and aging, and the number of elderly people living alone is increasing in Western countries and Japan [6]. Living alone increases the risk of social isolation and shortens healthy life expectancy [7]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to present scientific evidence that living environment is related to the onset or progression of the disease to propose strategies for effective interventions and disease prevention. In particular, postmenopausal women are known to have an increased risk of developing various lifestyle-associated diseases originally regulated by estradiol, such as osteoporosis, obesity, and heart disease [8]. However, no detailed studies have examined the influence of environmental factors on various diseases in postmenopausal women. Proving the hypothesis that the living environment has a significant impact on the risk of developing metabolic diseases after menopause will highlight the importance of environmental enrichment from a preventive medicine perspective. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether environmental factors, such as environmental enrichment or isolation, affect energy metabolism abnormalities after menopause.

Material and methods

Mice

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Kyushu University (approval numbers A21-358 and A23-168).

Experimental animals and environmental conditions

C57BL/6J female mice, obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan), were raised in specific-pathogen-free facility under controlled environmental conditions (a 12-hours light/dark cycle, temperature of 20–26 °C, and humidity of 40–70%). The mice at 8-week-old were randomized by body weight and assigned to either the enriched environment (EE), the standard condition (SC), or the isolated condition (IS). The EE mice (5 mice/cage) were housed in a cage (267[W] × 426[D] × 150[H] mm) consisted of a running wheel and shelter (Mouse lgloo and Fast Tracs, Bio-Serv, Flemington, NJ, USA) and a tunnel (Shepherd Tube, EP Trading, Tokyo, Japan), in which a bedding mixture of 2:1 soft bedding (Alpha-dri-Certified, EP Trading) and woody tips (Tokojiki, Douourika, Sapporo, Japan) was used. The SC (5 mice/cage) and IS mice (1 mouse/cage) were maintained in standard cages (168[W] × 299[D] × 133[H] mm) with no additional objects, in which only woody tips (Tokojiki, Douourika) were used. All bedding in the cages was replaced weekly. The mice were either sham-operated (sham) or ovariectomized (OVX) at 9 weeks of age under anesthesia using intraperitoneal injections of 0.75 mg/kg medetomidine, midazolam (4 mg/kg), and saline (5 mg/kg) [9].

Histological analysis

White adipose tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. For histological examination, Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin Y staining was applied to each 5 μm-thick section and observed using a microscope (BZ-X800, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). The adipocyte area was measured using the BZ-X800 Analyzer software (KEYENCE) [10].

Glucose (GTT) and pyruvate (PTT) tolerance tests

At 12 weeks of age, the mice were subjected to an intraperitoneal injection of glucose (2 mg/kg body weight) or pyruvate solution (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan, 1.5 g/kg body weight) after 20 hours of fasting. Glucose levels were assessed using a handheld glucometer (Freestyle Freedom Lite, Abbott Park, IL, USA) at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes after injection.

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)

The HOMA-IR index was calculated using Equation (1) [11]:

HOMA-IR=fastingserumglucosemg/dl×fastingseruminsulinng/ml×26/405 (1)

Serum glucose and insulin levels after fasting for 20 hours were measured using a D-glucose assay kit (GOPOD Format; Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) and an LBISTM Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit (U-type) (Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan), respectively.

Serum corticosterone measurement

Serum corticosterone levels were measured using the DetectX Corticosterone ELISA Kit (Arbor Assays, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Serum biochemical analysis

All serum biological analysis was performed by Oriental Yeast (Tokyo, Japan).

Measurement of mouse momentum and body temperature

The amount of activity and subcutaneous temperature in the mice were monitored using an implantable device (nanotag, Kissei Comtec, Matsumoto, Japan) and analyzed using the nanotag Viewer program (Kissei Comtec) [12].

Measurement of daily food consumption

Daily feed intake was measured using a powder feeder and multifeeder (MF3S for an IS cage and MF4S for SC and EE cages) (SHINFACTORY, Fukuoka, Japan).

Statistical analysis

ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer test was performed using GraphPad Prism 10 software (version 10.4.1; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Each parametric test was followed by a multiple comparison test after applying the D’Agostino & Pearson test to determine and validate the presence of a normal distribution. All experiments were performed more than three times, and all quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SE). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Effects of body weight change and housing environment in sham and OVX mice

To evaluate the effects of different environments on sham and OVX menopausal model mice, mice were randomly assigned to SC, EE, and IS environments to allow them to acclimate to the environment one week before the operation (sham or OVX) (Fig 1A, 1B). At the time of the sham/OVX operation (week 1), no difference in body weight was observed among the groups (Fig 1C). Sham and OVX mice raised for an additional 3 weeks (week 4) showed no marked differences in body weight between the SC, EE, and IS environments (Fig 1D). OVX-induced weight gain was observed in each housing environment (Fig 1D), which was consistent with a previous report that OVX mice had higher body weights than sham-operated mice [13]. The difference in body weight gain between weeks 1 and 4 also indicated that OVX led to weight gain regardless of the environment (Fig 1E).

Fig 1. Housing environments and body weight changes.

Fig 1

(A) Experimental schedule. (B) Images of three different housing environments, (Left) EE, (Middle) SC, and (Right) IS environments. (C, D) Body weight at week 1 (C) and week 4 (D). (E) Body weight changes in (C) and (D). In all groups, n = 10. Experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. All values are shown as the means ± SE. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were used; ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. SE, standard error; ANOVA, analysis of variance; OVX, ovariectomized; SC, standard conditions; EE, enriched environment; IS, isolated conditions.

Effects of housing environment on feed intake, energy expenditure, and body temperature in sham-operated and OVX mice

Body weight gain is closely related to an energy imbalance between energy intake and expenditure [14]. Therefore, we investigated whether there were differences in feed intake, physical activity, and body temperature between these mice in the different environments. Daily feed intake was monitored during week 3. Regardless of whether they were in the sham or OVX group, the feed intake of SC mice was substantially higher than that of EE mice (Fig 2A). In addition, OVX led to a higher increase in feed intake in IS than in EE mice (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Measurements of feed intake, physical activity, and body temperature.

Fig 2

(A) Daily feed intake per mouse. (B) Momentum per mouse. (C) Area under the curve for (B). (D) Body temperature during week 3. (E) Area under the curve for (D). (F,G) Body temperature at 01:00 (F) and 13:00 (G). Red: EE, Black: SC, Blue: IS. Experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. All values are shown as the means ± SE. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were used; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. SE, standard error; ANOVA, analysis of variance; OVX, ovariectomized; SC, standard conditions; EE, enriched environment; IS, isolated conditions.

In the sham group, the physical activity level of EE mice in week 3 was substantially higher than that in the SC and IS groups; however, that in the EE-sham mice was markedly lower after OVX (Fig 2B, 2C), which is consistent with the fact that the decrease in estradiol reduces physical activity [15]. Estradiol regulates circadian rhythm [15]. The circadian rhythm of physical activity observed in sham mice, which indicates decreased activity during the light period and increased activity during the dark period, was not clearly observed in the OVX group (Fig 2B, 2C).

The circadian rhythm of body temperature, which is a vital metabolic sign, was also disrupted in the OVX group (Fig 2D). In addition, a marked decrease in body temperature was observed in the IS-sham group compared to that in the EE-sham group, especially during the light period (Fig 2E2G). No changes in body temperature were observed in the OVX groups in the housing environments (Fig 2D2G).

Effects of housing environment on adipose tissue phenotype in sham-operated and OVX mice

To investigate the cause of weight gain in OVX mice (Fig 1E), gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) was analyzed 4 weeks after environmental habituation (weeks 5, Fig 1A). A substantial increase in gWAT mass in OVX mice compared to that in sham mice in each corresponding environment was observed (Fig 3A), suggesting that OVX-related body weight change was closely related to gWAT weight change. Furthermore, gWAT weight was substantially lower in EE mice than in the sham and OVX groups (Fig 3A), whereas no change in body weight was found in the latter groups (Fig 1C1E). This tendency was negatively correlated with physical activity (Fig 2B, 2C), suggesting that exercise might alter the quantity and quality of gWAT. The histological analysis indicated that the adipocytes of EE mice were substantially smaller than those of SC mice in the sham and OVX groups (Fig 3B, 3C), and there was a positive correlation between gWAT weight (Fig 3A) and adipocyte size (Fig 3B, 3C). These results suggest that gWAT expansion was mainly caused by adipocyte hypertrophy.

Fig 3. Measurements of white adipose tissue weight and adipocyte size.

Fig 3

(A) Gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT) weight at week 5 (n = 14-15). (B) Representative images of H&E staining in gWAT. Scale bars: 100 μm. (C) Quantification of the adipocyte area (area per adipocyte, μm2) performed using a microscope at 20× magnification in four random fields per section (n = 5). The experiments were repeated at least three times, and similar results were obtained. All values are shown as the means ± SE. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. SE, standard error; ANOVA, analysis of variance; OVX, ovariectomized; South Carolina, standard conditions; EE, enriched environment; IS, isolated conditions.

Effects of housing environment on glucose metabolic parameters in sham and OVX mice

Since white adipose tissues play an essential role in glucose homeostasis [16,17], glucose metabolism disorders are commonly found during menopause [18]. Therefore, the effects of the environment on glucose metabolic parameters in sham and OVX mice were investigated.

In glucose tolerance tests (GTT), IS-sham mice showed decreased glucose tolerance compared to mice in EE and SC, although there was no statistical difference between sham and OVX mice in the IS environment (Fig 4A, 4B). The most characteristic trend was an increase in blood glucose levels 15 minutes after glucose injection and fasting glucose levels under IS conditions in both sham and OVX mice (Fig 4C, 4D), although there was no difference in leisure blood glucose levels among the groups (Fig 4E). Severe postprandial glucose spike and high fasting glucose levels adversely affect long-term glycemic control and increase the risk of cardiovascular events, and which can lead to more damage than a steady state of high glucose [1921].

Fig 4. Measurement of metabolic parameters and serological analysis.

Fig 4

(A) GTT in sham (left) and OVX (right) mice (n = 5). (B) Area under the curve for (A). (C) Blood glucose level 15 minutes after glucose injection during GTT. (D) Fasting blood glucose level. (E) Leisure blood glucose level. (F) Leisure serum insulin level. (G) Fasting serum insulin level. (H) HOMA-IR value. (I) Serum corticosterone level. (J) PTT in sham (left) and OVX (right) mice (n = 5). (K) Area under the curve for (J). (L–V) Serological tests for total protein (L), Albumin (M), LDL-cholesterol (N), HDL-cholesterol (O), T.-cholesterol (P), triglyceride (Q), sodium (R), chloride (S), calcium (T), inorganic phosphorus (U), and potassium (V). Experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. All values are shown as the means ± SE. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were used, *P. < 0.05, **P. < 0.01, *** P. < 0.001. SE, standard error; ANOVA, analysis of variance; OVX, ovariectomized; South Carolina, standard conditions; EE, enriched environment; IS, isolated conditions; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; glucose (GTT) and pyruvate (PTT) tolerance tests; L/HDL, low/high density lipoprotein.

Menopausal mouse models exhibit insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia [22]. In the current study, the leisure serum insulin concentration in OVX mice was substantially higher than that in sham mice in SC and IS, and this tendency was improved in EE (Fig 1F). In contrast, no marked difference was observed in fasting serum insulin levels between sham and OVX mice (Fig 4G), as previously reported [23], but it was decreased in EE compared to IS in the OVX groups (Fig 4G).

HOMA-IR, an index of insulin resistance calculated from fasting serum glucose and fasting insulin concentrations, was substantially elevated in the IS compared to EE in the OVX mice (Fig 4H).

A strong relationship exists between glucose regulation and glucocorticoids (24), which are the main effectors of stress response [24,25] A study reported that OVX increased serum glucocorticoid content compared to sham-operated mice [26], but there is a report of no change in these contents [27]. In the current study, we observed an OVX-induced increase in corticosterone levels in the EE and IS groups, although there was no change in serum corticosterone content due to environmental differences (Fig 4I). Serum corticosterone contents in mice other than EE-sham mice increased over the reference range, suggesting that these mice might be in a stressful environment [28].

Gluconeogenesis is partially regulated by glucocorticoids [2931]; therefore, gluconeogenesis was studied in in the mice. Glycemic excursion in response to pyruvate during pyruvate tolerance tests (PTT) was suppressed in the EE compared to the IS environment in the sham and OVX groups (Fig 4L, 4M).

Serological test results showed no statistical differences between the groups in total protein, albumin, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (T-CHO), Sodium (Na), Chloride (Cl), Calcium (Ca), and Inorganic phosphorus (IP), whereas triglyceride (TG) was substantially increased in SC compared EE and IS groups in OVX mice (Fig 4N4W). In addition, the serum potassium levels were markedly lower in IS-OVX than in EE-OVX mice (Fig 4U). Given that insulin is a regulator of potassium intracellular uptake [32], high serum insulin concentrations (Fig 4G, 4F) can be correlated with decreased serum potassium levels in IS-OVX mice (Fig 4U).

Discussion

In the current study, we proved that OVX induced weight gain and circadian rhythm disruption, and that metabolic parameters changed depending on the housing environment; EE was better and IS was worse. Therefore, glucose intolerance and insulin resistance were the most affected in IS-OVX mice.

Exercise is an important environmental factor. We suggest that exercise in EE induces increased muscle mass and fat burning, and improves metabolic parameters. Although the space allocation per mouse was greater in the IS than in the SC environment, there was no difference in physical activity levels between the SC and IS. The reason for the deterioration in energy metabolism in IS-OVX mice over SC-OVX mice was likely due to decreased social enrichment. Although housing densities are also known to be important for animal welfare [33], social isolation had a major impact on metabolic abnormalities in IS-OVX mice in this study.

No definitive correlations were found between feed intake, exercise, and body weight. It is generally known that overeating and a lack of exercise are not direct causes of body weight gain [34], and that feed intake, physical activity, and body weight changes are influenced by multiple factors, including stress [34], such that further studies on endocrine factors are required. The changes in body weight and gWAT were not always correlated in all groups. Changes in fat mass also affect changes in lean muscle mass. Exercise promotes an increase in muscle mass [35] and fat burning [36]; changes in both muscle and fat mass lead to changes in body weight. Therefore, further analyses of body composition may be required to determine whether changes in body weight are dependent on fat or lean mass in all mice.

Furthermore, changes in body temperature owing to stress have long been reported [37]. In the current study, body temperature was substantially lower in IS-sham than in EE-sham mice (Fig 2E2G), but no differences in corticosterone levels were observed between the groups (Fig 4I). The temperature of the experimental room was set to 20–26 °C, in accordance with international guidelines [38]. However, this temperature environment can be cold stress for rodents, in which the body temperature can easily drop if they are constantly active [38]. Therefore, body temperature results can be attributed to the differences between groups and individual housing.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that in a housing environment in which exercise and social contact are eliminated, energy metabolism abnormalities can occur within a short period of time. OVX disrupts circadian rhythms, resulting in a decrease in physical activity even in an enriching environment; social isolation worsens metabolic abnormalities such as insulin resistance. There are some limitations in this study. For example, we observed the effects of comprehensive environmental enrichment without distinguishing between physical and social enrichment, and all animals were analyzed after invasive surgery, OVX or sham, which might make them to feel some stress. However, even considering the limitations of our experimental design, our results can suggest that an enriched living environment with societal contact and activity are important for promoting health, especially after menopause.

Supporting information

S1 Raw Data. Fig 2B & D_4A&J raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0320180.s001.xlsx (37.7KB, xlsx)

Abbreviations

OVX

ovariectomy

SC

standard condition

EE

enriched environment

IS

isolated condition

gWAT

gonadal white adipose tissue

ELISA

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

H&E

Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin Y

GTT

glucose tolerance test

PTT

pyruvate tolerance test

HOMA-IR

Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance

AUC

area under the curve

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (Grant No. 20KK0213 to EJ).

References

  • 1.Simone-Freilicher E, Rupley AE. Juvenile psittacine environmental enrichment. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2015;18(2):213–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2015.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDonald MW, Hayward KS, Rosbergen ICM, Jeffers MS, Corbett D. Is environmental enrichment ready for clinical application in human post-stroke rehabilitation? Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:135. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bayne K. Environmental enrichment and mouse models: Current perspectives. Animal Model Exp Med. 2018;1(2):82–90. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cao L, Liu X, Lin E-JD, Wang C, Choi EY, Riban V, et al. Environmental and genetic activation of a brain-adipocyte BDNF/leptin axis causes cancer remission and inhibition. Cell. 2010;142(1):52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fernandes MS de S, Lacerda TR, Fidélis DE da S, Santos GCJ, Filgueira TO, de Souza RF, et al. Environmental enrichment in cancer as a possible tool to combat tumor development: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(22):16516. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grundy E. The living arrangements of elderly people. Rev Clin Gerontol. 1992;(2):353–61. doi: 10.1017/s0959259800003191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(15):5797–801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lobo RA, Gompel A. Management of menopause: a view towards prevention. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(6):457–70. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00269-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yousefzadeh N, Jeddi S, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. Diabetoporosis: Role of nitric oxide. EXCLI J. 2021;20:764–80. doi: 10.17179/excli2021-3541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang F, Gao J, Li A, Mizokami A, Matsuda M, Aoki K, et al. Activation of NF-κB signaling regulates ovariectomy-induced bone loss and weight gain. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2024;1870(7):167320. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Minowa K, Rodriguez-Agudo D, Suzuki M, Muto Y, Hirai S, Wang Y, et al. Insulin dysregulation drives mitochondrial cholesterol metabolite accumulation: initiating hepatic toxicity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Lipid Res. 2023;64(5):100363. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2023.100363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Funabashi D, Tsuchida R, Matsui T, Kita I, Nishijima T. Enlarged housing space and increased spatial complexity enhance hippocampal neurogenesis but do not increase physical activity in mice. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;5:1203260. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1203260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Freid R, Hussein AI, Schlezinger JJ. Tributyltin protects against ovariectomy-induced trabecular bone loss in C57BL/6J mice with an attenuated effect in high fat fed mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021;431:115736. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Faria SL, Faria OP, Menezes CS, de Gouvêa HR, de Almeida Cardeal M. Metabolic profile of clinically severe obese patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(8):1257–62. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0651-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hatcher KM, Royston SE, Mahoney MM. Modulation of circadian rhythms through estrogen receptor signaling. Eur J Neurosci. 2020;51(1):217–28. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luo L, Liu M. Adipose tissue in control of metabolism. J Endocrinol. 2016;231(3):R77–99. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peppler WT, Townsend LK, Knuth CM, Foster MT, Wright DC. Subcutaneous inguinal white adipose tissue is responsive to, but dispensable for, the metabolic health benefits of exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;314(1):E66–77. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00226.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stachowiak G, Pertyński T, Pertyńska-Marczewska M. Metabolic disorders in menopause. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015;14(1):59–64. doi: 10.5114/pm.2015.50000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hershon KS, Hirsch BR, Odugbesan O. Importance of postprandial glucose in relation to A1C and cardiovascular disease. Clin Diabetes. 2019;37(3):250–9. doi: 10.2337/cd18-0040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hanssen NMJ, Kraakman MJ, Flynn MC, Nagareddy PR, Schalkwijk CG, Murphy AJ. Postprandial glucose spikes, an important contributor to cardiovascular disease in diabetes?. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:570553. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.570553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ogiso K, Shayo SC, Kawade S, Hashiguchi H, Deguchi T, Nishio Y. Repeated glucose spikes and insulin resistance synergistically deteriorate endothelial function and bardoxolone methyl ameliorates endothelial dysfunction. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0263080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Medina-Contreras J, Villalobos-Molina R, Zarain-Herzberg A, Balderas-Villalobos J. Ovariectomized rodents as a menopausal metabolic syndrome model. A minireview. Mol Cell Biochem. 2020;475(1–2):261–76. doi: 10.1007/s11010-020-03879-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Puolakkainen T, Rummukainen P, Pihala-Nieminen V, Ritvos O, Savontaus E, Kiviranta R. Treatment with soluble activin type IIB receptor ameliorates ovariectomy-induced bone loss and fat gain in mice. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022;110(4):504–17. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00934-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beaupere C, Liboz A, Fève B, Blondeau B, Guillemain G. Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):623. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ferris HA, Kahn CR. New mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance: make no bones about it. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(11):3854–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI66180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wagenmaker ER, Moenter SM. Exposure to acute psychosocial stress disrupts the luteinizing hormone surge independent of estrous cycle alterations in female mice. Endocrinology. 2017;158(8):2593–602. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Qiao S, Alasmi S, Wyatt A, Wartenberg P, Wang H, Candlish M, et al. Intra-pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone signaling regulates hepatic lipid metabolism in mice. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1098. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36681-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gong S, Miao Y-L, Jiao G-Z, Sun M-J, Li H, Lin J, et al. Dynamics and correlation of serum cortisol and corticosterone under different physiological or stressful conditions in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kinote A, Faria JA, Roman EA, Solon C, Razolli DS, Ignacio-Souza LM, et al. Fructose-induced hypothalamic AMPK activation stimulates hepatic PEPCK and gluconeogenesis due to increased corticosterone levels. Endocrinology. 2012;153(8):3633–45. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Salgado MC, Metón I, Egea M, Baanante IV. Transcriptional regulation of glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit promoter by insulin and glucose in the carnivorous fish, Sparus aurata. J Mol Endocrinol. 2004;33(3):783–95. doi: 10.1677/jme.1.01552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu L, Lu Y, Jiao Y, Liu B, Li S, Li Y, et al. Paternal psychological stress reprograms hepatic gluconeogenesis in offspring. Cell Metab. 2016;23(4):735–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.DeFronzo RA, Felig P, Ferrannini E, Wahren J. Effect of graded doses of insulin on splanchnic and peripheral potassium metabolism in man. Am J Physiol. 1980;238(5):E421-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1980.238.5.E421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Svenson KL, Paigen B. Recommended housing densities for research mice: filling the gap in data-driven alternatives. FASEB J. 2019;33(3):3097–111. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801972R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yanai S, Semba Y, Endo S. Remarkable changes in behavior and physiology of laboratory mice after the massive 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Konopka AR, Harber MP. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy after aerobic exercise training. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014;42(2):53–61. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Irwin ML, Yasui Y, Ulrich CM, Bowen D, Rudolph RE, Schwartz RS, et al. Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(3):323–30. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.3.323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Friedman M. Hyperthermia as a manifestation of stress. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1949;29:433–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kokolus KM, Capitano ML, Lee C-T, Eng JW-L, Waight JD, Hylander BL, et al. Baseline tumor growth and immune control in laboratory mice are significantly influenced by subthermoneutral housing temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(50):20176–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304291110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Andre van Wijnen

5 Feb 2025

PONE-D-25-01987The impact of environmental enrichment on energy metabolism in ovariectomized micePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Jimi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the minor points raised by the reviewer.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 22 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andre van Wijnen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (Grant No. 20KK0213 to EJ). 

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (Grant No. 20KK0213 to EJ). 

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (Grant No. 20KK0213 to EJ). 

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Authors,

Strictly follow my comments/correction in the attached file. In general:

1. at the end of the introduction section, need of the study should be ideally raised followed by the hypothesis of the study.

2. in statistical analysis, add mathematical model for better understanding of data analysis.

3. in results, add actual p-value of each result

4. in conclusion, add limitations of the study

Thank you!

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-01987.pdf

pone.0320180.s002.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 2;20(4):e0320180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320180.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


9 Feb 2025

We sincerely appreciate the thorough analyses and constructive suggestions provided by the reviewer, which have been very helpful in guiding us to improve our study further. We hope the editor and the reviewer will concur with us after reading the enclosed point-to-point response that we have addressed all the raised concerns satisfactorily and that the revised manuscript is now suitable for its publication as a Research Article in PLOS ONE.

To Reviewer #1:

Dear Authors,

Strictly follow my comments/correction in the attached file. In general:

1. at the end of the introduction section, need of the study should be ideally raised followed by the hypothesis of the study.

We appreciate the reviewer’s comment. We added a statement of the need for this research and a hypothesis at the end of the “Introduction” section (page2, Line 65-68) in the revised manuscript.

2. in statistical analysis, add mathematical model for better understanding of data analysis.

In agreement with the reviewer’s suggestion, we revised the “Materials and Methods” section (page 4, Line 126-132) in the revised manuscript.

3. in results, add actual p-value of each result

According to the reviewer’s suggestion, we added respective actual p-values to all graphs in which significant differences were obtained. We added p-values in the “Figure Legends” section (lines 156, 190, and 218) in the revised manuscript.

4. in conclusion, add limitations of the study

According to the reviewer’s suggestion, we added limitations of the study in the “Conclusion” section (page 14, Line 325-329) in the revised manuscript.

We also revised the manuscript about the following minor points that the reviewer kindly pointed out.

5. Page 4, Line 91-93, in the original manuscript, which experimental design was followed?

We revised the sentence to “The mice at 8-week-old were randomized by body weight and assigned to either the enriched environment (EE), the standard condition (SC), or the isolated condition (IS)” in the “Materials and Methods” section (page 3, Line 79-80) in the revised manuscript.

6. Page 15, Line 376-379, in the original manuscript, Add reference.

The appropriate reference #10 was added to the “Material & methods” section on page 3, line 98, and to the "References" section on p15, lines 276-379, in the revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_PLoS One.docx

pone.0320180.s004.docx (16.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Andre van Wijnen

17 Feb 2025

The impact of environmental enrichment on energy metabolism in ovariectomized mice

PONE-D-25-01987R1

Dear Dr. Jimi,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Andre van Wijnen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Andre van Wijnen

PONE-D-25-01987R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Jimi,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Andre van Wijnen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Raw Data. Fig 2B & D_4A&J raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0320180.s001.xlsx (37.7KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-01987.pdf

    pone.0320180.s002.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_PLoS One.docx

    pone.0320180.s004.docx (16.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES