Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):199–208. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000923

Neuropathogenesis of acute HIV: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic approaches

Fangzhi (Frank) Jia a,b,c, Bruce J Brew a,d
PMCID: PMC11970608  PMID: 40110851

Abstract

Purpose of review

The neuropathogenesis of acute HIV leads to rapid central nervous system (CNS) involvement, characterized by early viral entry, immune activation, and the formation of viral reservoirs. Despite effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), these reservoirs persist, drive neuroinflammation and injury and lead to HIV-associated neurodegenerative disorders (HAND). This review provides an updated synthesis of the mechanisms in acute HIV neuropathogenesis, biomarkers of CNS injury and emerging therapeutic approaches. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms is critical for addressing persistent HAND in ART-treated individuals.

Recent findings

Growing evidence now supports the principal role of infected CD4+ T cells in mediating HIV neuroinvasion alongside monocytes, resulting in seeding in perivascular macrophages, pericytes, and adjacent microglia and astrocytes. These reservoirs contribute to ongoing transcriptional activity and viral persistence despite antiretroviral therapy. Neuroinflammation, driven by activated microglia, astrocytes, inflammasomes, and neurotoxic viral proteins, disrupts neuronal homeostasis. Emerging therapies, including latency-reversing agents and transcription inhibitors, show promise in reducing neuroinflammation and reservoir activity.

Summary

Understanding the mechanisms of HIV neuropathogenesis and reservoir persistence has significant implications for developing targeted therapies to mitigate HAND. Strategies to eliminate CNS reservoirs and reduce neuroinflammation should be prioritized to improve long-term cognitive outcomes in people with HIV.

Keywords: antiretroviral therapy, biomarkers, HIV, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, neuropathogenesis

INTRODUCTION

The central nervous system is a key target of HIV, with neurological complications such as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remaining prevalent even in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, affecting approximately 20–50% of people with HIV (PWH) [15]. HAND are classified into three categories: asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), characterized by subtle deficits in ≥2 cognitive domains without functional decline; mild neurocognitive disorder (MND), where cognitive impairment interferes with daily activities; and HIV-associated dementia (HAD), a severe form marked by profound memory loss, psychomotor slowing, and behavioural changes (e.g., apathy, irritability). Understanding the neuropathogenesis of HIV is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies to mitigate these disorders.

Acute HIV infection involves early central nerve system (CNS) invasion, often occurring within days to weeks following initial systemic infection. CNS invasion occurs rapidly after systemic HIV, facilitated by infected CD4+ T cells and monocytes that traverse the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [611]. These cells seed viral reservoirs in perivascular macrophages, microglia, and astrocytes, which sustain low-level viral transcription and chronic neuroinflammation despite antiretroviral therapy (ART) [1218]. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the CNS, become activated by viral proteins such as Tat and gp120, triggering cytokine release and neuronal injury [19]. Similarly, astrocytes contribute to neurotoxicity through dysregulated glutamate homeostasis and inflammatory signalling [2023]. The interplay between viral persistence, immune activation, and glial dysfunction drives the progression of HAND, as detailed in subsequent sections.

The inability of ART to act directly at the transcription stage of the HIV life cycle and fully penetrate the CNS contributes to ongoing low-level viral replication (both whole virus and viral proteins), persistent inflammation, and continued development of HAND [11,2427]. The limited CNS penetration of ART highlights the need for adjunctive therapies that target viral reservoirs and reduce neuroinflammation [28,29].

Research is increasingly focusing on therapeutic strategies such as latency-reversing agents, anti-inflammatory therapies, and neuroprotective interventions to address these issues [30,31]. This review will discuss the mechanisms by which HIV enters the CNS, the establishment of viral reservoirs, subsequent neuroinflammatory responses, and emerging therapeutic approaches aimed at improving neurocognitive outcomes. 

Box 1.

Box 1

no caption available

Entry of HIV into the central nervous system

The entry of HIV into the CNS is a crucial early event in the pathogenesis of HAND [16,32]. The process is thought to occur within days to weeks after initial systemic infection, leading to the establishment of viral reservoirs in the CNS, which complicate treatment and facilitate ongoing neuroinflammation [8,9,33].

HIV enters the CNS through multiple pathways. Foremost is the well accepted “Trojan horse” mechanism, which traditionally depicts infected peripheral monocytes transmigrating across the BBB, differentiating into macrophages, and subsequently establishing viral reservoirs within the CNS [6,34]. BBB integrity is compromised in acute HIV infection due to several factors, including proinflammatory cytokines secreted by perivascular HIV-infected monocytes and macrophages [35]. Monocytes and macrophages are classically thought key contributors to viral entry into the CNS. They are possibly among the first cells to cross the BBB in response to infection, trafficking the virus directly into the brain [1,36]. Upon transmigration into the CNS, these infected macrophages become perivascular macrophages, which not only serve as reservoirs for the virus but also release viral proteins and inflammatory cytokines [14,37].

However, strong accumulating evidence now supports the important and likely principal role that infected T cells, especially CD4+ memory T cells, play in HIV neuroinvasion, through entry into the brain and probably choroid plexus during early infection [10,11,3840]. T cells home to the brain at low numbers to survey the brain, seeding HIV infection [40]. After entry, CD4+ T cells probably rapidly transmit the viruses that integrate into perivascular macrophages and microglial cells, the main cell types that harbour HIV replication in the brain [41]. The infected CD4+ T cells, however, do not persist long in the brain parenchyma and are generally not found in the brain in postmortem studies. On the other hand, CD8+ T cells are found. While infected CD4+ T cells are transient in the brain parenchyma, CD8+ T cells persist as part of ongoing immune surveillance. This dichotomy may reflect differences in cytopathic effects (HIV preferentially depletes CD4+ T cells) or compartmentalized immune responses that limit CD4+ survival. Notably, CD8+ T cells in the CNS exhibit clonal expansion and effector phenotypes, suggesting sustained antiviral activity [39,40]. Interestingly, a recent discovery showed that a unique population of CD8+ T cells which express CD4 on its surface, called CD4dimCD8bright T cells, may also mediate HIV neuroinvasion [42] though to a lesser extent than memory CD4+ T cells [10,11]. The interactions between HIV-infected T cells and endothelial cells lining the BBB can lead to increased permeability and further facilitate viral entry [43].

Viral proteins, such as Tat and gp120, are also crucial in CNS invasion. These proteins disrupt BBB integrity by inducing oxidative stress, cytokine release, and apoptosis of endothelial cells [7,44]. Tat, in particular, has been shown to activate matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), enzymes that degrade extracellular matrix components and weaken the BBB [45,46]. On the other hand, gp120-mediated interactions with CXCR4 and CCR5 receptors on endothelial cells further contribute to BBB disruption [47,48].

Another pathway of CNS invasion occurs by the cell-free virus, likely because of BBB permeability due to infiltration by infected mononuclear phagocytes and immune activation [32,49,50]. Further suggested mechanisms include entry through the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier and infection of the choroid plexus cells [51,52], and entry through the newly discovered glymphatic system, which may serve as a source of HIV+ cells that circulate into the CNS from peripheral lymph nodes [53,54].

Early immune activation and neuroinflammation

The early immune response to HIV entry in the CNS drives neuroinflammation, contributing significantly to HAND [33]. Immune activation occurs in a multitude of ways following viral entry and a detailed review on this topic is written by Dr Georgia Tomaras in this issue [55].

Microglia, as resident immune cells, are rapidly activated and express MHC class I and II antigens and adhesion molecules, releasing proinflammatory cytokines like tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 [15,18]. HIV proteins Tat and gp120 bind to microglial receptors, prompting further inflammation [40,56]. Microglia and astrocytes also release chemokines (e.g., CCL2) which attract monocytes to the CNS across the BBB [21,57,58].

Inflammasomes like NLRP3 also contribute to early neuroinflammation, with activation by viral proteins (e.g. Vpr) resulting in increased pyroptosis and neuronal damage [5961]. HIV infection triggers the convergent activation of caspases-1 and -3, leading to GSDME- and NINJ1-mediated neuronal pyroptosis, contributing to HAND [62▪▪]. A further pathway, the kynurenine pathway, which is involved in energy production and neurodegeneration through its production of quinolinic acid (QUIN) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), is activated in HAND and several studies have demonstrated a correlation between CSF QUIN levels and HAND severity [22,63,64]. Additionally, HIV-specific T cells infiltrate the CNS and release cytokines, which while controlling viral replication, also promote neuroinflammation [39,65].

Impact of astrocytes in early infection

Astrocytes are the most abundant glial cells in the CNS and serve crucial roles in maintaining homeostasis and supporting neuronal survival. In the context of HIV, however, these cells are impaired, contributing substantially to neuroinflammation and neuronal dysfunction [1]. Astrocytes and glial cells – through their contributions to neuroinflammation, impaired glutamate handling, cytokine release, and BBB disruption – play a pivotal role in the progression of HIV-associated neuropathology.

Although direct infection of astrocytes by HIV is uncommon due to their relative lack of CD4 receptors, they can nonetheless be infected through other receptors and are intimately involved in HIV neuropathogenesis. HIV can enter astrocytes via endocytosis, but this process is highly inefficient and most viral particles are degraded, an event metaphorically described as a “kiss of death” [66]. Restricted infection of astrocytes occurs more frequently, with up to 19% of astrocytes in infected brain tissue carrying HIV DNA, especially in later disease stages [67]. These infected astrocytes can secrete factors that negatively impact neuronal function, and their activation can lead to the release of neurotoxic substances, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) and glutamate, that contribute to disease [20,56].

A hallmark of HIV-related neuropathology is the dysregulation of astrocytic glutamate handling. Typically, astrocytes work to clear excess extracellular glutamate to protect neurons from excitotoxicity, a form of cell death resulting from overstimulation [68]. However, HIV-infected astrocytes exhibit impaired glutamate uptake and paradoxically release excess glutamate, a process influenced by interactions with infected macrophages and activated microglia [23,69]. This impaired handling of glutamate creates an environment conducive to excitotoxic neuronal damage [70].

The HIV protein Tat can induce astrocytes to express chemokines such as MCP-1 (a chemoattractant for macrophages) and other proinflammatory molecules, thereby promoting the recruitment of immune cells to the CNS and intensifying the inflammatory cycle [71]. Astrocyte activation also involves the release of cytokines like TNF-α, driven by the interaction of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) with CXCR4 receptors, exacerbating inflammation [72].

Although oligodendrocytes are not directly infected by HIV, they are indirectly affected by the ongoing inflammatory milieu. HIV-induced neuroinflammation impairs oligodendrocyte maturation and function, leading to demyelination and subsequent disruption of neuronal connectivity – factors that play a role in the cognitive deficits characteristic of HAND [7375].

Neurotoxic viral proteins and neuronal dysfunction

HAND is partly driven by the direct neurotoxic effects of HIV proteins, including gp120, Tat, Vpr, and Nef, which have been implicated in numerous pathways leading to neuronal injury, apoptosis, and dysfunction (Table 1) [7,76]. The effects of these viral proteins are exerted both directly on neurons and indirectly through interactions with glial cells, triggering neuroinflammation and other deleterious processes.

Table 1.

Neurotoxic HIV proteins

Protein Mechanism Impact
Tat Mitochondrial dysfunction, NMDA receptor activation Oxidative stress, excitotoxicity
gp120 CXCR4/CCR5 binding, glutamate release Synaptodendritic injury
Vpr NLRP3 inflammasome activation Pyroptosis, neuroinflammation
Nef Astrocyte cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-6) Chronic inflammation

IL, interleukin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.

The HIV envelope protein gp120 interacts with chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 on neuronal and glial cells, leading to excitotoxicity and calcium dysregulation [77,78]. The binding of gp120 to these receptors results in excessive intracellular calcium influx, which subsequently activates proapoptotic cascades [79,80]. gp120 also induces the release of glutamate from astrocytes, exacerbating excitotoxic damage in neurons – a hallmark of HIV neuropathogenesis [72]. Recent studies have further elucidated the role of gp120 in disrupting synaptic plasticity and reducing dendritic spine density [81,82].

Tat, another HIV protein, is a potent neurotoxin that disrupts mitochondrial function to promote oxidative stress and neuronal apoptosis [8385]. Tat has also been found to interfere with the function of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, enhancing glutamate excitotoxicity and promoting synaptic damage [86,87].

The HIV-1 accessory protein Vpr also contributes to neurodegeneration through its impact on cellular energy metabolism and apoptosis [88]. Vpr disrupts mitochondrial integrity, causing depolarization and the release of pro-apoptotic factors such as cytochrome c, leading to cell death [89,90]. Vpr can also induce neuronal apoptosis indirectly by stimulating the production of proinflammatory cytokines from microglia and astrocytes [91,92]. Additionally, Vpr can alter the permeability of the BBB, exacerbating the influx of infected immune cells into the CNS [93].

Another HIV protein, Nef, stimulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines from glial cells, and it has been linked to dendritic simplification and decreased synaptic density in neurons [9496]. Nef-induced activation of astrocytes and microglia results in increased levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), contributing to neuronal dysfunction and apoptosis [97,98].

Recent findings also emphasize the role of these viral proteins in epigenetic modifications that contribute to neuronal dysfunction. For instance, HIV Tat has been shown to alter histone acetylation in neurons, thereby affecting gene expression related to synaptic function and neuronal survival [99,100]. Furthermore, HIV gp120 has been implicated in the dysregulation of microRNAs, which can lead to changes in neuronal gene expression and exacerbate neurodegenerative processes [101].

Central nervous system reservoir formation and viral persistence despite ART

As described above, neuroinvasion by HIV and establishment of a CNS reservoir occur early, within days to weeks after systemic infection, through infected CD4+ T cells and monocytes, subsequently establishing reservoirs in microglia, perivascular macrophages and astrocytes [38,41,102,103]. The brain is a significant HIV reservoir and sanctuary where viral persistence and transcriptional activity continue despite suppressive ART, and this correlates with the reduced, but still high prevalence of HAND in ART-suppressed PWH [104,105].

Multiple lines of recent evidence have substantiated the presence and ongoing transcriptional activity of the CNS reservoir, and its pathogenicity in relation to HAND. Our recent studies confirmed intact, replication-competent HIV reservoirs in the CNS (frontal lobe) of ART-suppressed PWH [106,107▪▪]. Using the highly sensitive Double-R assay, cell-associated HIV-1 RNA transcripts could be quantified in the vast majority of ART-suppressed PWH and occurred at much higher levels in the CSF cells than in their peripheral blood mononuclear cells [11]. Higher levels of HIV-1 transcripts in CSF cells correlated with greater brain injury in the frontal white matter and posterior cingulate [11]. Single-cell analyses of CSF and blood samples in ART-suppressed PWH revealed that a subset of central memory CD4+ T cells in the CSF produced HIV-1 RNA and that HIV-1–infected cells were more frequently found in the CSF than in the blood [108].

Further confirming this is a more recent study which showed persistent HIV reservoir in the frontal cortex of suppressed PWH and demonstrated that active HIV transcription occurs [109▪▪]. HIV RNA transcripts were detected in frontal cortex tissue of PWH regardless of suppression with ART, and levels of HIV TAR transcripts were similar between suppressed and nonsuppressed PWH [109▪▪]. This echoes Henderson et al.'s earlier finding that Tat and Trans-activation response (TAR) RNA are present in the CSF and are biologically active in CSF exosomes [110]. Looking at immune profiling, older ART-suppressed PWH still have noticeable interferon, stress response and energy metabolism gene expression changes which correlate with white matter abnormalities [111].

These results have considerable therapeutic implications which will be discussed in a later section. Several classes of ART exist; however, once viral integration has occurred, the only class of drugs that can inhibit formation of replicating viral particles is protease inhibitors. Even so, protease inhibitors prevent the cleavage of the gag-pol polyprotein and have no effect on the production of early viral proteins such as Tat. This has two consequences; one is that Tat protein levels may indicate the presence and potentially the size of the viral reservoir [110], and second is that it partially contributes to the observation that long-term viral suppression with ART does not appear to be impacting the level of transcriptional initiation in the brain [11,109▪▪].

Biomarkers of neuropathogenesis in acute HIV

The identification and monitoring of biomarkers are essential for understanding the neuropathogenesis of acute HIV infection and for assessing the progression of HAND (Table 2). Biomarkers can provide insights into the early immune response, neuronal injury, inflammation, and changes in the integrity of the BBB, reflecting different aspects of HIV's impact on the CNS [112114].

Table 2.

CNS Biomarkers of HIV

Biomarker Source Association
Neurofilament light chain (NfL) Neuronal axons Axonal injury, HAND progression
Neopterin Activated macrophages/monocytes/microglia Neuroinflammation
sCD163 Monocyte activation Cognitive impairment
GFAP Astrocytes Cognitive impairment

CNS, central nervous system.

In the early stages of HIV infection, elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) are frequently observed, indicating an acute immune response within the CNS [115]. These cytokines are not only markers of immune activation but also contributors to the disruption of neuronal homeostasis. A recent systematic review found that higher levels of IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-7, IL-8, sTNFR-II and lower levels of IL-6, as well as higher levels of neopterin, sCD163 and sCD14 were consistently associated with neurocognitive impairment [116].

Another important marker of immune activation is neopterin, a byproduct of activated macrophages, monocytes and microglia. Elevated neopterin levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been reported in individuals with acute HIV infection, reflecting early immune activation within the CNS [117120]. Recent research continues to support the association between neopterin levels and neurocognitive outcomes, underscoring its relevance as a biomarker of neuroinflammation [121,122].

Soluble CD14 (sCD14) and soluble CD163 (sCD163), markers of monocyte and macrophage activation respectively, are also elevated during acute HIV infection, indicating ongoing inflammation and the activation of the myeloid compartment in the CNS [123,124]. Elevated sCD163 levels have been linked to neuronal damage and cognitive impairment, making it a valuable marker for assessing the degree of inflammation-related neurotoxicity [125]. Recent studies also highlight the association of sCD14 and sCD163 levels with persistent cognitive deficits in individuals on ART [126].

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a key biomarker for neuronal damage and HAND risk, elevated in acute and chronic HIV infection [122,127,128]. Recent findings suggest that NfL levels remain elevated in some patients despite effective ART, indicating ongoing subclinical neurodegeneration [129].

Markers of oxidative stress, such as F2-isoprostanes, are also elevated during acute HIV infection, suggesting that ROS production and lipid peroxidation are involved in the early neuropathogenetic processes [130,131]. BBB disruption is another critical aspect of acute HIV neuropathogenesis, and markers like MMP-9 and S100β, a calcium-binding protein produced by astrocytes, have been used to assess BBB integrity [64,132,133]. S100β levels are also elevated in the CSF of individuals with acute HIV infection and have been correlated with neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits [134].

Recent advances in proteomic analyses have revealed differential expression of proteins related to immune activation, synaptic function, and mitochondrial dynamics in the CSF and plasma of HIV-infected individuals [135,136]. These high-throughout approaches have identified potential new biomarkers, such as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), which may provide insights into mitochondrial dysfunction and intercellular communication during acute HIV infection [137]. A recent study identified plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a novel biomarker of cognitive decline in PWH [138].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are also emerging as important biomarkers for assessing neuropathogenesis in acute HIV infection. Dysregulation of miRNAs, such as miR-9, miR-29, and miR-146a, has been observed in HIV-infected individuals and has been linked to neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes [101,139]. The expression patterns of these miRNAs are associated with the severity of HAND and may serve as noninvasive biomarkers for monitoring disease progression [140].

Therapeutic considerations in view of HIV neuropathogenesis

Early ART initiation during acute HIV significantly mitigates neuropathogenesis. The Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Treatment (START) trial found that immediate ART reduces CNS viral reservoirs compared to delayed treatment [33]. Early suppression limits immune activation, as evidenced by lower CSF neopterin and neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in rapid initiators [141]. These findings underscore the importance of universal ‘test-and-treat’ strategies to prevent HAND.

Despite the success of ART in transforming HIV into a manageable chronic condition, HAND remains a persistent challenge, driven largely by immune activation, chronic inflammation, and the persistence of viral reservoirs in the CNS. New therapeutic approaches aim to complement ART by addressing these underlying drivers of neurocognitive impairment [30].

One key area of focus has been developing adjunctive therapies that specifically target immune activation and neuroinflammation. Anti-inflammatory agents, such as minocycline and statins, have shown limited benefit in reducing inflammation without consistent effect on cognitive outcomes [142146]. A 2022 trial showed ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, was well tolerated and significantly decreased markers of immune activation and cell survival in ART-treated PWH [147].

Another promising approach involves the use of neuroprotective agents aimed at preventing neuronal damage. Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, and lithium, a mood stabilizer, have been studied for their potential neuroprotective effects in HIV. However, clinical outcomes have been mixed, with limited efficacy reported for memantine [148].

The gut-brain axis contributes to HAND pathogenesis through microbial translocation and neuroinflammation in ART-suppressed HIV infection [149]. Probiotics, prebiotics, and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) are being investigated as possible interventions to restore gut integrity and reduce inflammation, potentially benefiting neurocognitive health [150,151].

Addressing the persistence of HIV within the CNS, novel strategies involving latency-reversing/reactivating agents and gene therapy are also under exploration [152,153]. Latency-reversing agents like histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors aim to reactivate latent HIV (“shock and kill”), which could help reduce viral reservoirs in the CNS [154]. Another strategy to incapacitate the ability of HIV reservoir to reactivate is the “block and lock” approach, using the so-called latency-promoting agents, which can inhibit HIV transcription by inducing a deep latency state [155]. These agents are largely experimental, but the principle of transcription inhibition is paramount in future HIV drug research, since it may be argued that there is no true latency state in the brain, i.e. there is continuing transcriptional activity which underlies neurodegeneration. Meanwhile, gene-editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have shown potential for excising proviral DNA, although their clinical application faces significant challenges related to effective delivery and safety [156158].

Improving the ability of ART to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is another therapeutic focus. The CNS penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score has been used to evaluate ART regimens, with higher CPE scores being linked to better viral suppression in the CNS and improved cognitive outcomes in some but not all studies [26]. The variable results may reflect the heterogeneity of HAND patients with respect to BBB impairment – when it is present the CPE score may not be relevant as the drug can enter regardless. Recent efforts have centred on the development of nanoformulations of antiretrovirals to enhance drug delivery to the CNS, which could be instrumental in reducing viral persistence and inflammation [159].

CONCLUSION

The acute neuropathogenesis of HIV involves early CNS entry through infected CD4+ T cells and monocytes, establishing reservoirs that fuel neuroinflammation. Mechanisms include microglial activation, leading to cytokine release and neuronal damage, and astrocytic dysfunction causing excitotoxicity. Establishment of a CNS reservoir, viral persistence and replication, and central neuroinflammation occur despite ART suppression and drive ongoing neurodegeneration. Biomarkers such as neopterin, TNF-α, IL-1β, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) indicate inflammation and neuronal injury, aiding in monitoring disease progression. Therapeutic strategies focus on reducing neuroinflammation via anti-inflammatory agents, enhancing ART penetration into the CNS, targeting latent reservoirs using latency-reversing agents and inhibiting transcriptional activity. Addressing these processes is crucial to prevent early neuronal injury and mitigate long-term cognitive decline associated with HIV infection.

Acknowledgements

None.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest

  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gonzalez-Scarano F, Martin-Garcia J. The neuropathogenesis of AIDS. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5:69–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ances BM, Ellis RJ. Dementia and neurocognitive disorders due to HIV-1 infection. Semin Neurol 2007; 27:86–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heaton RK, Clifford DB, Franklin DR, Jr, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology 2010; 75:2087–2096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cysique LA, Brew BJ. Prevalence of nonconfounded HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment in the context of plasma HIV RNA suppression. J Neurovirol 2011; 17:176–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saylor D, Dickens AM, Sacktor N, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder—pathogenesis and prospects for treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12:234–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gartner S. HIV infection and dementia. Science 2000; 287:602–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nath A. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) proteins in neuropathogenesis of HIV dementia. J Infect Dis 2002; 186: (Suppl 2): S193–S198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Valcour VG, Shiramizu BT, Shikuma CM. HIV DNA in circulating monocytes as a mechanism to dementia and other HIV complications. J Leukoc Biol 2010; 87:621–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bednar MM, Sturdevant CB, Tompkins LA, et al. Compartmentalization, viral evolution, and viral latency of HIV in the CNS. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2015; 12:262–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharma V, Creegan M, Tokarev A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid CD4+ T cell infection in humans and macaques during acute HIV-1 and SHIV infection. PLoS Pathog 2021; 17:e1010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Suzuki K, Zaunders J, Gates TM, et al. Elevation of cell-associated HIV-1 transcripts in CSF CD4+ T cells, despite effective antiretroviral therapy, is linked to brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2022; 119:e2210584119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guillemin GJ, Brew BJ. Microglia, macrophages, perivascular macrophages, and pericytes: a review of function and identification. J Leukoc Biol 2004; 75:388–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spudich S, Robertson KR, Bosch RJ, et al. Persistent HIV-infected cells in cerebrospinal fluid are associated with poorer neurocognitive performance. J Clin Invest 2019; 129:3339–3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wallet C, De Rovere M, Van Assche J, et al. Microglial cells: the main HIV-1 reservoir in the brain. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019; 9:362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garden GA. Microglia in human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurodegeneration. Glia 2002; 40:240–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rao VR, Ruiz AP, Prasad VR. Viral and cellular factors underlying neuropathogenesis in HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). AIDS Res Ther 2014; 11:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borrajo A, Spuch C, Penedo MA, et al. Important role of microglia in HIV-1 associated neurocognitive disorders and the molecular pathways implicated in its pathogenesis. Ann Med 2021; 53:43–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bai R, Song C, Lv S, et al. Role of microglia in HIV-1 infection. AIDS Res Ther 2023; 20:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fitting S, Booze RM, Mactutus CF. HIV-1 proteins, Tat and gp120, target the developing dopamine system. Curr HIV Res 2015; 13:21–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ton H, Xiong H. Astrocyte dysfunctions and HIV-1 neurotoxicity. J AIDS Clin Res 2013; 4:255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li GH, Henderson L, Nath A. Astrocytes as an HIV reservoir: mechanism of HIV infection. Curr HIV Res 2016; 14:373–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kandanearatchi A, Brew BJ. The kynurenine pathway and quinolinic acid: pivotal roles in HIV associated neurocognitive disorders. FEBS J 2012; 279:1366–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gorska AM, Eugenin EA. The glutamate system as a crucial regulator of CNS toxicity and survival of HIV reservoirs. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ellis R, Langford D, Masliah E. HIV and antiretroviral therapy in the brain: neuronal injury and repair. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8:33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ances BM, Clifford DB. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders and the impact of combination antiretroviral therapies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2008; 8:455–461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Letendre S, Marquie-Beck J, Capparelli E, et al. Validation of the CNS penetration-effectiveness rank for quantifying antiretroviral penetration into the central nervous system. Arch Neurol 2008; 65:65–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Osborne O, Peyravian N, Nair M, et al. The paradox of HIV blood-brain barrier penetrance and antiretroviral drug delivery deficiencies. Trends Neurosci 2020; 43:695–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cysique LA, Waters EK, Brew BJ. Central nervous system antiretroviral efficacy in HIV infection: a qualitative and quantitative review and implications for future research. BMC Neurol 2011; 11:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McArthur JC, Brew BJ. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: is there a hidden epidemic? AIDS 2010; 24:1367–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ambrosius B, Gold R, Chan A, Faissner S. Antineuroinflammatory drugs in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders as potential therapy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2019; 6:e551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tanaka K, Kim Y, Roche M, Lewin SR. The role of latency reversal in HIV cure strategies. J Med Primatol 2022; 51:278–283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Spudich S, Gonzalez-Scarano F. HIV-1-related central nervous system disease: current issues in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012; 2:a007120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33▪.Chan P, Spudich S. Central nervous system effects of early HIV infection and consequences of antiretroviral therapy initiation during acute HIV. Viruses 2024; 16:1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Chan and Spudich (2024) provide a detailed analysis of the effects of acute HIV infection on the CNS and the impact of early ART initiation. This paper underscores the significance of timely ART initiation in mitigating CNS inflammation, reducing viral reservoir establishment, and preserving cognitive function. The authors also discuss emerging insights into biomarkers and therapeutic targets for addressing neurocognitive challenges in PWH.
  • 34.Persidsky Y, Poluektova L. Immune privilege and HIV-1 persistence in the CNS. Immunol Rev 2006; 213:180–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Strazza M, Pirrone V, Wigdahl B, Nonnemacher MR. Breaking down the barrier: the effects of HIV-1 on the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 2011; 1399:96–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Williams DW, Eugenin EA, Calderon TM, Berman JW. Monocyte maturation, HIV susceptibility, and transmigration across the blood brain barrier are critical in HIV neuropathogenesis. J Leukoc Biol 2012; 91:401–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fischer-Smith T, Tedaldi EM, Rappaport J. CD163/CD16 coexpression by circulating monocytes/macrophages in HIV: potential biomarkers for HIV infection and AIDS progression. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2008; 24:417–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sturdevant CB, Joseph SB, Schnell G, et al. Compartmentalized replication of R5 T cell-tropic HIV-1 in the central nervous system early in the course of infection. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11:e1004720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Subra C, Trautmann L. Role of T lymphocytes in HIV neuropathogenesis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2019; 16:236–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wahl A, Al-Harthi L. HIV infection of nonclassical cells in the brain. Retrovirology 2023; 20:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hellmuth J, Valcour V, Spudich S. CNS reservoirs for HIV: implications for eradication. J Virus Erad 2015; 1:67–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Albalawi YA, Narasipura SD, Olivares LJ, Al-Harthi L. CD4(dim) CD8(bright) T cells home to the brain and mediate HIV neuroinvasion. J Virol 2022; 96:e0080422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kanmogne GD, Primeaux C, Grammas P. HIV-1 gp120 proteins alter tight junction protein expression and brain endothelial cell permeability: implications for the pathogenesis of HIV-associated dementia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2005; 64:498–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pu H, Tian J, Flora G, et al. HIV-1 Tat protein upregulates inflammatory mediators and induces monocyte invasion into the brain. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 24:224–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xu R, Feng X, Xie X, et al. HIV-1 Tat protein increases the permeability of brain endothelial cells by both inhibiting occludin expression and cleaving occludin via matrix metalloproteinase-9. Brain Res 2012; 1436:13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sufiawati I, Tugizov SM. HIV-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation through mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling promotes HSV-1 cell-to-cell spread in oral epithelial cells. J Gen Virol 2018; 99:937–947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Louboutin JP, Strayer DS. Blood-brain barrier abnormalities caused by HIV-1 gp120: mechanistic and therapeutic implications. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012:482575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Smith LK, Babcock IW, Minamide LS, et al. Direct interaction of HIV gp120 with neuronal CXCR4 and CCR5 receptors induces cofilin-actin rod pathology via a cellular prion protein- and NOX-dependent mechanism. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Banks WA, Akerstrom V, Kastin AJ. Adsorptive endocytosis mediates the passage of HIV-1 across the blood-brain barrier: evidence for a postinternalization coreceptor. J Cell Sci 1998; 111 (Pt 4):533–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kanmogne GD, Grammas P, Kennedy RC. Analysis of human endothelial cells and cortical neurons for susceptibility to HIV-1 infection and co-receptor expression. J Neurovirol 2000; 6:519–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Falangola MF, Hanly A, Galvao-Castro B, Petito CK. HIV infection of human choroid plexus: a possible mechanism of viral entry into the CNS. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1995; 54:497–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schwerk C, Tenenbaum T, Kim KS, Schroten H. The choroid plexus—a multirole player during infectious diseases of the CNS. Front Cell Neurosci 2015; 9:80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tice C, McDevitt J, Langford D. Astrocytes, HIV and the glymphatic system: a disease of disrupted waste management? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:523379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ash MK, Al-Harthi L, Schneider JR. HIV in the brain: identifying viral reservoirs and addressing the challenges of an HIV cure. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tomaras G. Systemic immune responses during acute HIV. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kaul M, Garden GA, Lipton SA. Pathways to neuronal injury and apoptosis in HIV-associated dementia. Nature 2001; 410:988–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Conant K, Tornatore C, Atwood W, et al. In vivo and in vitro infection of the astrocyte by HIV-1. Adv Neuroimmunol 1994; 4:287–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dong Y, Benveniste EN. Immune function of astrocytes. Glia 2001; 36:180–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Walsh JG, Reinke SN, Mamik MK, et al. Rapid inflammasome activation in microglia contributes to brain disease in HIV/AIDS. Retrovirology 2014; 11:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.He X, Yang W, Zeng Z, et al. NLRP3-dependent pyroptosis is required for HIV-1 gp120-induced neuropathology. Cell Mol Immunol 2020; 17:283–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang C, Song JW, Huang HH, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome induces CD4+ T cell loss in chronically HIV-1-infected patients. J Clin Invest 2021; 131:138861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62▪▪.Fernandes JP, Branton WG, Cohen EA, et al. Caspase cleavage of gasdermin E causes neuronal pyroptosis in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Brain 2024; 147:717–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Fernandes et al. (2024) identify a novel mechanism underlying neuronal damage in HAND, demonstrating that caspase-mediated cleavage of gasdermin E triggers neuronal pyroptosis. This study highlights the role of inflammatory cell death pathways in HAND and provides a potential therapeutic target for mitigating neuroinflammation and neuronal injury.
  • 63.Heyes MP, Brew BJ, Martin A, et al. Quinolinic acid in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in HIV-1 infection: relationship to clinical and neurological status. Ann Neurol 1991; 29:202–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Anderson AM, Croteau D, Ellis RJ, et al. HIV, prospective memory, and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of quinolinic acid and phosphorylated Tau. J Neuroimmunol 2018; 319:13–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Marcondes MC, Burudi EM, Huitron-Resendiz S, et al. Highly activated CD8(+) T cells in the brain correlate with early central nervous system dysfunction in simian immunodeficiency virus infection. J Immunol 2001; 167:5429–5438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chauhan A, Tikoo A, Patel J, Abdullah AM. HIV-1 endocytosis in astrocytes: a kiss of death or survival of the fittest? Neurosci Res 2014; 88:16–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Churchill MJ, Wesselingh SL, Cowley D, et al. Extensive astrocyte infection is prominent in human immunodeficiency virus-associated dementia. Ann Neurol 2009; 66:253–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wesselingh SL, Thompson KA. Immunopathogenesis of HIV-associated dementia. Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14:375–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fine SM, Angel RA, Perry SW, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibits glutamate uptake by primary human astrocytes. Implications for pathogenesis of HIV-1 dementia. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:15303–15306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vazquez-Santiago FJ, Noel RJ, Jr, Porter JT, Rivera-Amill V. Glutamate metabolism and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. J Neurovirol 2014; 20:315–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kutsch O, Oh J, Nath A, Benveniste EN. Induction of the chemokines interleukin-8 and IP-10 by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat in astrocytes. J Virol 2000; 74:9214–9221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bezzi P, Domercq M, Brambilla L, et al. CXCR4-activated astrocyte glutamate release via TNFalpha: amplification by microglia triggers neurotoxicity. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4:702–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Liu H, Xu E, Liu J, Xiong H. Oligodendrocyte injury and pathogenesis of HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorders. Brain Sci 2016; 6:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jensen BK, Roth LM, Grinspan JB, Jordan-Sciutto KL. White matter loss and oligodendrocyte dysfunction in HIV: a consequence of the infection, the antiretroviral therapy or both? Brain Res 2019; 1724:146397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Roth LM, Akay-Espinoza C, Grinspan JB, Jordan-Sciutto KL. HIV-induced neuroinflammation inhibits oligodendrocyte maturation via glutamate-dependent activation of the PERK arm of the integrated stress response. Glia 2021; 69:2252–2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kaul M, Zheng J, Okamoto S, et al. HIV-1 infection and AIDS: consequences for the central nervous system. Cell Death Differ 2005; 12: (Suppl 1): 878–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hesselgesser J, Taub D, Baskar P, et al. Neuronal apoptosis induced by HIV-1 gp120 and the chemokine SDF-1 alpha is mediated by the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Curr Biol 1998; 8:595–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zheng J, Thylin MR, Ghorpade A, et al. Intracellular CXCR4 signaling, neuronal apoptosis and neuropathogenic mechanisms of HIV-1-associated dementia. J Neuroimmunol 1999; 98:185–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bagetta G, Corasaniti MT, Berliocchi L, et al. Involvement of interleukin-1beta in the mechanism of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) recombinant protein gp120-induced apoptosis in the neocortex of rat. Neuroscience 1999; 89:1051–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bachis A, Biggio F, Major EO, Mocchetti I. M- and T-tropic HIVs promote apoptosis in rat neurons. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2009; 4:150–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Toggas SM, Masliah E, Rockenstein EM, et al. Central nervous system damage produced by expression of the HIV-1 coat protein gp120 in transgenic mice. Nature 1994; 367:188–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chougnet C, Gessani S. Role of gp120 in dendritic cell dysfunction in HIV infection. J Leukoc Biol 2006; 80:994–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Aksenov MY, Hasselrot U, Bansal AK, et al. Oxidative damage induced by the injection of HIV-1 Tat protein in the rat striatum. Neurosci Lett 2001; 305:5–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.de Mareuil J, Carre M, Barbier P, et al. HIV-1 Tat protein enhances microtubule polymerization. Retrovirology 2005; 2:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Epie N, Ammosova T, Sapir T, et al. HIV-1 Tat interacts with LIS1 protein. Retrovirology 2005; 2:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Haughey NJ, Nath A, Mattson MP, et al. HIV-1 Tat through phosphorylation of NMDA receptors potentiates glutamate excitotoxicity. J Neurochem 2001; 78:457–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Krogh KA, Lyddon E, Thayer SA. HIV-1 Tat activates a RhoA signaling pathway to reduce NMDA-evoked calcium responses in hippocampal neurons via an actin-dependent mechanism. J Neurochem 2015; 132:354–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Gonzalez ME. The HIV-1 Vpr protein: a multifaceted target for therapeutic intervention. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:E126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Patel CA, Mukhtar M, Pomerantz RJ. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr induces apoptosis in human neuronal cells. J Virol 2000; 74:9717–9726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Piller SC, Jans P, Gage PW, Jans DA. Extracellular HIV-1 virus protein R causes a large inward current and cell death in cultured hippocampal neurons: implications for AIDS pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:4595–4600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Muthumani K, Zhang D, Hwang DS, et al. Adenovirus encoding HIV-1 Vpr activates caspase 9 and induces apoptotic cell death in both p53 positive and negative human tumor cell lines. Oncogene 2002; 21:4613–4625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kim K, Heo K, Choi J, et al. Vpr-binding protein antagonizes p53-mediated transcription via direct interaction with H3 tail. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:783–796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Atluri VS, Hidalgo M, Samikkannu T, et al. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus on blood-brain barrier integrity and function: an update. Front Cell Neurosci 2015; 9:212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Fackler OT, Baur AS. Live and let die: Nef functions beyond HIV replication. Immunity 2002; 16:493–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sol-Foulon N, Moris A, Nobile C, et al. HIV-1 Nef-induced upregulation of DC-SIGN in dendritic cells promotes lymphocyte clustering and viral spread. Immunity 2002; 16:145–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mann J, Patrick CN, Cragg MS, et al. Functional analysis of HIV type 1 Nef reveals a role for PAK2 as a regulator of cell phenotype and function in the murine dendritic cell line, DC2.4. J Immunol 2005; 175:6560–6569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Herbein G, Varin A, Larbi A, et al. Nef and TNFalpha are coplayers that favor HIV-1 replication in monocytic cells and primary macrophages. Curr HIV Res 2008; 6:117–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Liu X, Kumar A. Differential signaling mechanism for HIV-1 Nef-mediated production of IL-6 and IL-8 in human astrocytes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:9867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Reeder JE, Kwak YT, McNamara RP, et al. HIV Tat controls RNA Polymerase II and the epigenetic landscape to transcriptionally reprogram target immune cells. Elife 2015; 4:e08955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zhao X, Fan Y, Vann PH, et al. Long-term HIV-1 Tat expression in the brain led to neurobehavioral, pathological, and epigenetic changes reminiscent of accelerated aging. Aging Dis 2020; 11:93–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Masotti A, Donninelli G, Da Sacco L, et al. HIV-1 gp120 influences the expression of microRNAs in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells via STAT3 activation. BMC Genomics 2015; 16:480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sonti S, Sharma AL, Tyagi M. HIV-1 persistence in the CNS: mechanisms of latency, pathogenesis and an update on eradication strategies. Virus Res 2021; 303:198523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Tang Y, Chaillon A, Gianella S, et al. Brain microglia serve as a persistent HIV reservoir despite durable antiretroviral therapy. J Clin Invest 2023; 133:e167417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Gabuzda D, Yin J, Misra V, et al. Intact proviral DNA analysis of the brain viral reservoir and relationship to neuroinflammation in people with HIV on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Viruses 2023; 15:1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105▪.Fombellida-Lopez C, Berkhout B, Darcis G, Pasternak AO. Persistent HIV-1 transcription during ART: time to reassess its significance? Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2024; 19:124–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Fombellida-Lopez et al. (2024) critically reassess the significance of persistent HIV-1 transcription during suppressive ART, highlighting its role in sustaining immune activation and contributing to HIV-associated complications, including neurocognitive disorders. This paper emphasizes the need to target transcriptional activity within viral reservoirs and offers insights into emerging therapeutic approaches such as latency-reversing agents and transcriptional inhibitors.
  • 106.Cochrane CR, Angelovich TA, Byrnes SJ, et al. Intact HIV proviruses persist in the brain despite viral suppression with ART. Ann Neurol 2022; 92:532–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107▪▪.Angelovich TA, Cochrane CR, Zhou J, et al. Regional analysis of intact and defective HIV proviruses in the brain of viremic and virally suppressed people with HIV. Ann Neurol 2023; 94:798–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angelovich et al. (2023) conducted a detailed regional analysis of intact and defective HIV proviruses in the brain, demonstrating that intact proviruses persist in the CNS of both viraemic and virally suppressed individuals. This study highlights regional heterogeneity in viral persistence, emphasising the challenges of eradicating HIV from the brain.
  • 108.Farhadian SF, Lindenbaum O, Zhao J, et al. HIV viral transcription and immune perturbations in the CNS of people with HIV despite ART. JCI Insight 2022; 7:e160267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109▪▪.Jamal Eddine J, Angelovich TA, Zhou J, et al. HIV transcription persists in the brain of virally suppressed people with HIV. PLoS Pathog 2024; 20:e1012446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Jamal Eddine et al. (2024) provide compelling evidence that HIV transcription persists in the brain of virally suppressed individuals on ART. The study identifies active transcriptional activity in the frontal cortex and demonstrates the presence of transcriptional blocks that vary in extent between suppressed and nonsuppressed individuals.
  • 110.Henderson LJ, Johnson TP, Smith BR, et al. Presence of Tat and transactivation response element in spinal fluid despite antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2019; 33: (Suppl 2): S145–S157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Solomon IH, Chettimada S, Misra V, et al. White matter abnormalities linked to interferon, stress response, and energy metabolism gene expression changes in older HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy. Mol Neurobiol 2020; 57:1115–1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Gisslen M, Krut J, Andreasson U, et al. Amyloid and tau cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in HIV infection. BMC Neurol 2009; 9:63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Nixon DE, Landay AL. Biomarkers of immune dysfunction in HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2010; 5:498–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lundgren JD, Baxter J, Deeks SG, Lane HC. Biomarkers in HIV disease. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2010; 5:459–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Resnick L, Berger JR, Shapshak P, Tourtellotte WW. Early penetration of the blood-brain-barrier by HIV. Neurology 1988; 38:9–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Williams ME, Stein DJ, Joska JA, Naude PJW. Cerebrospinal fluid immune markers and HIV-associated neurocognitive impairments: a systematic review. J Neuroimmunol 2021; 358:577649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Brew BJ, Bhalla RB, Paul M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neopterin in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Ann Neurol 1990; 28:556–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Eden A, Price RW, Spudich S, et al. Immune activation of the central nervous system is still present after >4 years of effective highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 2007; 196:1779–1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hagberg L, Cinque P, Gisslen M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neopterin: an informative biomarker of central nervous system immune activation in HIV-1 infection. AIDS Res Ther 2010; 7:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Anesten B, Yilmaz A, Hagberg L, et al. Blood-brain barrier integrity, intrathecal immunoactivation, and neuronal injury in HIV. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016; 3:e300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Yilmaz A, Yiannoutsos CT, Fuchs D, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neopterin decay characteristics after initiation of antiretroviral therapy. J Neuroinflamm 2013; 10:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Jessen Krut J, Mellberg T, Price RW, et al. Biomarker evidence of axonal injury in neuroasymptomatic HIV-1 patients. PLoS One 2014; 9:e88591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Burdo TH, Lentz MR, Autissier P, et al. Soluble CD163 made by monocyte/macrophages is a novel marker of HIV activity in early and chronic infection prior to and after antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:154–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kamat A, Lyons JL, Misra V, et al. Monocyte activation markers in cerebrospinal fluid associated with impaired neurocognitive testing in advanced HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 60:234–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Williams JC, Zhang X, Karki M, et al. Soluble CD14, CD163, and CD27 biomarkers distinguish ART-suppressed youth living with HIV from healthy controls. J Leukoc Biol 2018; 103:671–680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Imp BM, Rubin LH, Tien PC, et al. Monocyte activation is associated with worse cognitive performance in HIV-infected women with virologic suppression. J Infect Dis 2017; 215:114–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Anderson AM, Easley KA, Kasher N, et al. Neurofilament light chain in blood is negatively associated with neuropsychological performance in HIV-infected adults and declines with initiation of antiretroviral therapy. J Neurovirol 2018; 24:695–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hagberg L, Eden A, Zetterberg H, et al. Blood biomarkers for HIV infection with focus on neurologic complications-A review. Acta Neurol Scand 2022; 146:56–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Anderson AM, Ma Q, Letendre SL, Iudicello J. Soluble biomarkers of cognition and depression in adults with HIV infection in the combination therapy era. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2021; 18:558–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Redhage LA, Shintani A, Haas DW, et al. Clinical factors associated with plasma F2-isoprostane levels in HIV-infected adults. HIV Clin Trials 2009; 10:181–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Buckley S, Byrnes S, Cochrane C, et al. The role of oxidative stress in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Brain Behav Immun Health 2021; 13:100235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kanner AA, Marchi N, Fazio V, et al. Serum S100beta: a noninvasive marker of blood-brain barrier function and brain lesions. Cancer 2003; 97:2806–2813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Turner RJ, Sharp FR. Implications of MMP9 for blood brain barrier disruption and hemorrhagic transformation following ischemic stroke. Front Cell Neurosci 2016; 10:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Pemberton LA, Brew BJ. Cerebrospinal fluid S-100beta and its relationship with AIDS dementia complex. J Clin Virol 2001; 22:249–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Donnelly MR, Ciborowski P. Proteomics, biomarkers, and HIV-1: a current perspective. Proteomics Clin Appl 2016; 10:110–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Naamati A, Williamson JC, Greenwood EJ, et al. Functional proteomic atlas of HIV infection in primary human CD4+ T cells. Elife 2019; 8:e41431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Hulgan T, Gerschenson M. HIV and mitochondria: more than just drug toxicity. J Infect Dis 2012; 205:1769–1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Mukerji SS, Bachanova P, Park H, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biomarkers of cognitive decline in people living with HIV. J Infect Dis 2024; jiae623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Tatro ET, Scott ER, Nguyen TB, et al. Evidence for alteration of gene regulatory networks through microRNAs of the HIV-infected brain: novel analysis of retrospective cases. PLoS One 2010; 5:e10337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Liu C, Ding Q, Kong X. Integrated analysis of the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network involved in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Pathogens 2022; 11:407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Peluso MJ, Valcour V, Ananworanich J, et al. Absence of cerebrospinal fluid signs of neuronal injury before and after immediate antiretroviral therapy in acute HIV infection. J Infect Dis 2015; 212:1759–1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zink MC, Uhrlaub J, DeWitt J, et al. Neuroprotective and antihuman immunodeficiency virus activity of minocycline. JAMA 2005; 293:2003–2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Nakasujja N, Miyahara S, Evans S, et al. Randomized trial of minocycline in the treatment of HIV-associated cognitive impairment. Neurology 2013; 80:196–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Sacktor N, Miyahara S, Evans S, et al. Impact of minocycline on cerebrospinal fluid markers of oxidative stress, neuronal injury, and inflammation in HIV-seropositive individuals with cognitive impairment. J Neurovirol 2014; 20:620–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Dirajlal-Fargo S, Kinley B, Jiang Y, et al. Statin therapy decreases N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in HIV: randomized placebo-controlled trial. AIDS 2015; 29:313–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Probasco JC, Spudich SS, Critchfield J, et al. Failure of atorvastatin to modulate CSF HIV-1 infection: results of a pilot study. Neurology 2008; 71:521–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Marconi VC, Moser C, Gavegnano C, et al. Randomized trial of ruxolitinib in antiretroviral-treated adults with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 74:95–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Schifitto G, Navia BA, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Memantine and HIV-associated cognitive impairment: a neuropsychological and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. AIDS 2007; 21:1877–1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Byrnes SJ, Busman-Sahay K, Angelovich TA, et al. Chronic immune activation and gut barrier dysfunction is associated with neuroinflammation in ART-suppressed SIV+ rhesus macaques. PLoS Pathog 2023; 19:e1011290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Brenchley JM, Price DA, Schacker TW, et al. Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection. Nat Med 2006; 12:1365–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Vazquez-Castellanos JF, Serrano-Villar S, Latorre A, et al. Altered metabolism of gut microbiota contributes to chronic immune activation in HIV-infected individuals. Mucosal Immunol 2015; 8:760–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Spivak AM, Planelles V. Novel latency reversal agents for HIV-1 cure. Annu Rev Med 2018; 69:421–436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Proust A, Barat C, Leboeuf M, et al. HIV-1 infection and latency-reversing agents bryostatin-1 and JQ1 disrupt amyloid beta homeostasis in human astrocytes. Glia 2020; 68:2212–2227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Rasmussen TA, Schmeltz Sogaard O, Brinkmann C, et al. Comparison of HDAC inhibitors in clinical development: effect on HIV production in latently infected cells and T-cell activation. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013; 9:993–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Chan P, Ananworanich J. Perspective on potential impact of HIV central nervous system latency on eradication. AIDS 2019; 33: (Suppl 2): S123–S133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Kaminski R, Bella R, Yin C, et al. Excision of HIV-1 DNA by gene editing: a proof-of-concept in vivo study. Gene Ther 2016; 23:690–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kaushik A, Yndart A, Atluri V, et al. Magnetically guided noninvasive CRISPR-Cas9/gRNA delivery across blood-brain barrier to eradicate latent HIV-1 infection. Sci Rep 2019; 9:3928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Rothemejer FH, Lauritsen NP, Juhl AK, et al. Development of HIV-resistant CAR T cells by CRISPR/Cas-mediated CAR integration into the CCR5 locus. Viruses 2023; 15:202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Macchione MA, Aristizabal Bedoya D, Figueroa FN, et al. Nanosystems applied to HIV infection: prevention and treatments. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES