Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 May;338:567–587. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014690

Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: peripheral neural coding in the monkey.

G D Lamb
PMCID: PMC1197211  PMID: 6875971

Abstract

Recordings were made from single mechanoreceptive afferents in the median or ulnar nerve of the anaesthetized monkey while the appropriate digital pad was stimulated by a textured surface moving at a constant velocity tangentially across the skin. The surface was swept across the afferent's receptive field many times, each time having been displaced sideways (laterally) by a small amount. The neural responses showed a temporal rhythm directly related to the period of the raised dots on the surface in the dimension parallel to the direction of movement. The responses also displayed direct dependence on the position of the dots and the period size in the lateral surface dimension. It was clear that only information from a large number of afferents could enable the discrimination of the textured surfaces examined. For large-dot (2.0 mm period) surfaces, increases of up to 8% in the period of the dots, in either surface dimension, produced a roughly linear increase in the mean response rate of every rapidly adapting (r.a.) afferent. There was virtually no change in the response rate of any slowly adapting (s.a.) afferent when the period of the dots was increased by similar small amounts, and the pacinian afferents (p.c.) displayed a wide range of behaviour to such period changes. In contrast, the mean response rate of p.c. afferents seemed most able of the three populations to transmit information about changes in the period in the case of small-dot (1.0 mm period) surfaces. The adequacy of a number of neural codes in accounting for all the psychophysical discrimination reported in the preceding paper (Lamb, 1983) was examined. A strong case could be made for a code involving the total or mean number of impulses evoked (a rate code), based on the r.a. afferent responses for the large-dot surfaces and, less certainly, on the p.c. afferent responses for the small-dot surfaces.

Full text

PDF
567

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Darian-Smith I., Davidson I., Johnson K. O. Peripheral neural representation of spatial dimensions of a textured surface moving across the monkey's finger pad. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:135–146. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darian-Smith I., Johnson K. O., Dykes R. "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):325–346. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Darian-Smith I., Johnson K. O., LaMotte C., Kenins P., Shigenaga Y., Ming V. C. Coding of incremental changes in skin temperature by single warm fibers in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Sep;42(5):1316–1331. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.5.1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Darian-Smith I., Johnson K. O., LaMotte C., Shigenaga Y., Kenins P., Champness P. Warm fibers innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to thermal stimuli. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Sep;42(5):1297–1315. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.5.1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darian-Smith I., Kenins P. Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:147–155. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Darian-Smith I., Oke L. E. Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:117–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:283–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson K. O., Darian-Smith I., LaMotte C., Johnson B., Oldfield S. Coding of incremental changes in skin temperature by a population of warm fibers in the monkey: correlation with intensity discrimination in man. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Sep;42(5):1332–1353. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.5.1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson K. O., Lamb G. D. Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:117–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson K. O. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Jan;37(1):48–72. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson K. O. Sensory discrimination: decision process. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;43(6):1771–1792. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.6.1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson K. O. Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;43(6):1793–1815. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.6.1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LaMotte R. H., Mountcastle V. B. Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):539–559. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lamb G. D. Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. J Physiol. 1983 May;338:551–565. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mountcastle V. B., Talbot W. H., Sakata H., Hyvärinen J. Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):452–484. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Talbot W. H., Darian-Smith I., Kornhuber H. H., Mountcastle V. B. The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301–334. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.2.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Uttal W. R. Emerging principles of sensory coding. Perspect Biol Med. 1969 Spring;12(3):344–368. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1969.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WERNER G., MOUNTCASTLE V. B. NEURAL ACTIVITY IN MECHANORECEPTIVE CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS: STIMULUS-RESPONSE RELATIONS, WEBER FUNCTIONS, AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:359–397. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES