Skip to main content
NPJ Parkinson's Disease logoLink to NPJ Parkinson's Disease
letter
. 2025 Apr 6;11:69. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-00919-y

Application of new biologic disease criteria for synucleinopathies to the systemic synuclein sampling study cohort

L M Chahine 1,, M C Brumm 2, A R Nair 2, S Mosovsky 1, N K Polinski 3, T G Beach 4, B Mollenhauer 5, C H Adler 6; On behalf of the Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study
PMCID: PMC11972316  PMID: 40188190

Abstract

We applied biologic criteria and NSD-ISS to Synuclein Sampling Study, a PD sample with range of durations since clinical diagnosis. 93% of evaluable participants met biologic criteria. The majority were NSD-ISS stage3 or less, including >40% of the advanced PD group. Interpretation of staging in medicated patients is challenging. Biologic criteria and clinico-biomarker staging are important steps forward, but quantitative biomarkers of disease progression, not influenced by medications, are critically needed.

Subject terms: Neuroscience, Neurology, Neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson's disease


We read with interest the article by Dam et al.1. There have been two newly proposed biologic criteria for Parkinson’s disease (PD), partially defined by in vivo evidence of pathologic alpha-synuclein (asyn) and neurodegeneration (termed Neuronal α-Synuclein Disease [NSD] by Simuni et al.2 and SynNeurGe by Höglinger et al.3). In addition to proposing this new biologic definition, Simuni et al. put forth a staging system, the Neuronal α-Synuclein Disease Integrated Staging System (NSD-ISS). In the manuscript by Dam et al., criteria are proposed to define stages 0–6 of the NSD-ISS and they report results of applying these criteria to cohorts of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of early PD.

We have applied the NSD, NSD-ISS, and SynNeurGe to an independent cohort, the Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4)46. The S4 aimed to examine the distribution of abnormal alpha-synuclein across different tissues and body fluids in PD; the study sample and available data7 offer a prime opportunity for the present post-hoc analysis. Unlike the cohorts examined by Dam et al., the S4 sample is comprised of individuals with a range of disease durations and severities, defined as follows: early PD (≤ 2 years since diagnosis, not treated with dopaminergic medication (exceptions made for rasagiline)), moderate PD (>2 but <5 years since diagnosis, treated with dopaminergic medication but without motor fluctuations), and advanced PD (≥5 years since diagnosis, with motor fluctuations). Other enrollment criteria were reduced dopamine transporter binding on SPECT scan (based on visual interpretation) and absence of dementia. Aggregated asyn was assessed in CSF and submandibular gland with asyn seed amplification assay (SAA), and in skin, submandibular gland, and colon with immunohistochemistry, as described5,6.

The study enrolled 61 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of PD (20 early, 20 moderate, 21 advanced). CSF was not available from seven (four early, two moderate, one advanced), and four were CSF asyn SAA negative (two moderate, two advanced). None of the participants had known pathogenic variants in LRRK2, GBA, or other PD-associated genes8. Thus, 50 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of PD (82% of those enrolled and 93% of those from whom CSF was available) met criteria for NSD (S + D + G−) and SynNeurGe (Syn+Neur+Ge−).

Despite differences in enrollment criteria, the majority of the sample, 33/50 (66%), were NSD-ISS stage 3, similar to the Dam et al. study (Table 1). Half of the advanced PD group were stage 4, but two (13%) of the early PD group were stage 4 as well, consistent with findings by Dam et al. that a recent diagnosis is not a sufficient indicator of early/mild disease severity.

Table 1.

Characteristics and NSD-ISS stages of S4 study participants who met NSD and SynNeurGe criteria, according to enrollment cohort

All PD
(N = 50)
Early PD
(N = 16)
Moderate PD
(N = 16)
Advanced PD
(N = 18)
p-value
Age, mean (SD) years 63.1 (8.4) 62.0 (9.7) 59.4 (5.3) 67.4 (7.8) 0.0054
Time since diagnosis, mean (SD) years 4.8 (4.6) 0.8 (0.7) 3.6 (1.2) 9.4 (4.4) <0.0001a
LEDD, mean (SD) mg 460.0 (443.0) 37.5 (61.9) 405.3 (182.9) 884.2 (414.2) <0.0001
NSD-ISS Stage 0.0056b
 Stage 2B, N (%) 4 (8%) 2 (13%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%)
 Stage 3, N (%) 33 (66%) 12 (75%) 14 (88%) 7 (39%)
 Stage 4, N (%) 12 (24%) 2 (13%) 1 (6%) 9 (50%)
 Stage 5, N (%) 1 (2%) 0 0 1 (6%)

LEDD Levodopa equivalent dosage.

aPD groups were recruited based on time since diagnosis.

bIn pairwise comparison, stages varied significantly between the moderate and advanced PD (p-value = 0.0036) and between the early and advanced PD (p-value = 0.0221). Stages 4 and 5 were combined into single category for Fisher’s exact test due to low counts.

It is notable that >40% of the advanced PD group were in stage 3 or less. Given that all advanced PD participants were treated with dopaminergic medication, interpretation of staging in these medicated patients is challenging. It is certainly possible that some individuals with PD of many-years duration still have mild disease. However, two of the core assessments proposed by Dam et al. for the definition of the stages in the NSD-ISS are susceptible to medication effects: presence/absence of parkinsonism, and the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part II (which ascertains function “on average” rather than specifically determining function in medication OFF or ON states). An examination of a selected case illustrates this point. One participant enrolled in the advanced group was a female aged 70–74 years. Despite a disease duration of 8.3 years since diagnosis, the results of the patient and clinician-reported outcomes indicate relatively mild disease, with minimal functional impairment: Schwab and England score were 90, MDS-UPDRS part III score was 18 in the medication OFF state and 12 in the medication ON state, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was 30. However, this participant was being treated with 660 mg of levodopa equivalents, and the extent to which the functional level is a result of medication versus underlying disease severity simply cannot be ascertained.

Four participants enrolled in the S4 PD cohort had a negative CSF asyn SAA, despite reduced DAT binding on SPECT scan. While S4 measured pathologic asyn in multiple tissues and biofluids5,6, none of the participants who had negative CSF had abnormal asyn assessed with other assays endorsed in the SynNeurGe criteria3. Thus, these individuals have parkinsonism and nigral degeneration without evidence of aggregated asyn. Whether these individuals have false negative results, have a form of pathologic asyn undetected by the methods used, or have an underlying biology that is completely independent of asyn, is unknown at this time.

As for the NSD-ISS, results of application to a medicated cohort such as S4 emphasize the need for quantitative biomarkers of disease progression that are not influenced by medications. This will be critical before a staging system can be put forth that will be useful and widely applicable in research and the clinic without the confounds of symptomatic therapies.

Acknowledgements

Study participants. Ergun Uc (Medical Monitor). Jan Hamer (Biorepository). Colleen Mitchell (Biorepository). Scott Appel (Biostatistician). Dixie Ecklund (Clinical and Statistics Core). Holly Riss (Clinical and Statistics Core). Lucia Sue (Pathology Core). Anthony Intorcia (Pathology Core). Michael Glass (Pathology Core). Jessica Walker (Pathology Core). Lindsey Guilmette (Imaging Core). Vikash Oza (Dermatology Collaborator). David Lott (ENT Collaborator). Ali Keshavarzian (GI Collaborator). Julie Schneider (Pathology Collaborator). Thomas Kremer (Industry Collaborator). Christian Schmauch (Industry Collaborator). Peggy Taylor (Industry Collaborator). Trevis Huff (Clinical and Statistics Core). Danielle Smith (Biorepository). Chaucer Noyes-Lloyd (Study Coordinator). Rachael Purri (Study Coordinator). Brandon Rothberg (Study Coordinator). Courtney Blair (Study Coordinator). K. Rose case (Study Coordinator). Madeline Cresswell (Study Coordinator). Amy Duffy (Study Coordinator). Madeline Potter (Study Coordinator). General Electric for donation of DATscanTM doses in kind. This research was funded by grant ID # 025819 by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (MJFF).

Author contributions

L.M.C.: study design, data collection, drafting of manuscript. B.M.: study design, data collection, drafting of manuscript. M.C.B.: study design, data collection, data analysis, drafting of manuscript. A.R.N.: data analysis, drafting of manuscript. T.G.B.: study design, data collection, drafting of manuscript. C.H.A.: study design, data collection, drafting of manuscript. S.M.: review and revision of manuscript. N.K.P.: review and revision of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

Data for this study can be accessed at: Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study. Zenodo MJFF Data Repository; https://zenodo.org/records/7431680 (2022).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.

Change history

4/24/2025

The Data availability statement was incorrect and it has been updated correctly.

Contributor Information

L. M. Chahine, Email: lchahine2018@gmail.com

On behalf of the Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study:

Rizwan Akhtar, Amy Amara, Vanessa Arnedo, David P. Breen, Michael C. Brumm, Chelsea Caspell-Garcia, Christopher Coffey, John Crary, Kuldip Dave, Tatiana Foroud, Penelope Hogarth, Danna Jennings, Katherine Kopil, Carly Linder, Connie Marras, David Munoz, Luis Oliveira, Lindsey Riley, David Russell, John Seibyl, Geidy E. Serrano, Naomi Visanji, and Charles L. White, III

References

  • 1.Dam, T. et al. Neuronal alpha-synuclein disease integrated staging system performance in PPMI, PASADENA, and SPARK baseline cohorts. NPJ Parkinsons Dis.10, 178 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simuni, T. et al. A biological definition of neuronal α-synuclein disease: towards an integrated staging system for research. Lancet Neurol.23, 178–190 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Höglinger, G. U. et al. A biological classification of Parkinson’s disease: the SynNeurGe research diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol.23, 191–204 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Visanji, N. P. et al. The Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study: toward a biomarker for Parkinson’s disease. Biomark. Med.11, 359–368 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chahine, L. M. et al. In vivo distribution of α-synuclein in multiple tissues and biofluids in Parkinson disease. Neurology95, e1267–e1284 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chahine, L. M. et al. Central and peripheral α-synuclein in Parkinson disease detected by seed amplification assay. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol.10.1002/acn3.51753 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study. Zenodo MJFF Data Repository; https://zenodo.org/records/7431680 (2022).
  • 8.Blauwendraat, C. et al. NeuroChip, an updated version of the NeuroX genotyping platform to rapidly screen for variants associated with neurological diseases. Neurobiol. Aging57, 247.e249–247.e213 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data for this study can be accessed at: Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study. Zenodo MJFF Data Repository; https://zenodo.org/records/7431680 (2022).


Articles from NPJ Parkinson's Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES