Skip to main content
Cancer Innovation logoLink to Cancer Innovation
. 2025 Apr 7;4(3):e70009. doi: 10.1002/cai2.70009

Coexistent Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer: An Analysis of Incidence Trends, Financial Burdens and Influencing Factors

Fei Qi 1,2, Hongjie Yang 1, Yi Han 3, Yujie Dong 4, Fan Zhang 1,5, Yishuo Wang 1, Juan Du 4, Yuan Gao 1,2, Xueguang Hu 6, Liqun Zhang 7, Tongmei Zhang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC11973439  PMID: 40196746

ABSTRACT

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) and lung cancer (LC) are both major global health threats. However, coexistent pulmonary TB and LC (TBLC) is a unique condition for which incidence trends and risk factors have not been fully defined.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with TBLC and LC alone between 2010 and 2022 at Beijing Chest Hospital, the standard authority for the diagnosis and treatment of TB and LC in China. The cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of TBLC was calculated as the number of new TBLC cases/number of LC cases at risk per 100,000 annually. The comparative incidence rate ratio (IRR) was estimated to be the TB incidence in LC patients/TB incidence in the general population. Logistic regression was used to explore risk factors for TBLC.

Results

The CIR of TBLC has rapidly increased each year since 2014 and reached 7027 per 100,000 LC patients in 2022. Patients with LC had a higher risk of developing active TB than the general population (IRR = 25.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.54–29.89). Medical expenditure per patient was 100.60 thousand yuan for those with TBLC and 105.60 thousand yuan for patients with LC (p = 0.687). Patients with TBLC were older (63.61 ± 10.46 vs. 61.08 ± 10.77, p < 0.001) and had a higher male‐to‐female ratio (2.82 vs. 1.59, p = 0.044) than those with LC alone. A tendency of earlier disease onset was observed in patients with LC rather than TBLC. A majority (44.92%) of TBLC lesions were located in the upper lobes of the lung and had a higher proportion of squamous cell carcinomas than LC alone (32.24% vs. 27.49%, p = 0.002). TBLC also presented more aggressively, with more lymph node involvement and distant metastases. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, the male sex, mediastinal lymph node invasion, lung/bone metastases, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, malnutrition, pulmonary fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were risk factors for active TBLC.

Conclusions

There has been a rise in the incidence of coexistent TBLC and a concomitant increase in its financial burden in China that deserves more awareness and attention.

Keywords: clinicopathological features, incidence, lung cancer, pulmonary tuberculosis, risk factors


This study systemically evaluated the incidence, disease burden, clinicopathological features and risk factors of coexistent pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer (TBLC) over 12‐year period in China. Growing cumulative incidence rate of TBLC was revealed, causing increasing disease burden. TBLC presents with certain unique clinicopathological features and more aggressive nature than LC alone, placing high demands on prevention and control strategies of this disease.

graphic file with name CAI2-4-e70009-g004.jpg


Abbreviations

ADC

adenocarcinoma

BALF

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

CI

confidence interval

CIR

cumulative incidence rate

COPD

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

HR

hazard ratio

ICI

immune checkpoint inhibitor

IRR

incidence rate ratio

LC

lung cancer

LNM

lymph node metastases

PF

pulmonary fibrosis

RR

relative ratio

SCC

squamous cell carcinoma

SCLC

small cell lung cancer

TB

tuberculosis

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) and lung cancer (LC) are both major global health threats. According to the World Health Organization global TB report in 2023, a total of 10.6 million people fall ill with TB, and 1.5 million die from TB every year [1, 2, 3]. The average annual incidence rate of TB was reported to be 59.17/100,000 on the Chinese mainland [4, 5, 6]. Meanwhile, LC is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death in China [7, 8, 9]. Coexistent TB and LC (TBLC) is a unique condition, and its diagnosis requires clinical, radiological, and microbiological evidence [10, 11, 12, 13]. Although it accounts for only a small proportion of LC patients, there is a heavy financial burden associated with TBLC in China, given the large LC population base.

Trends in the incidence of TB and LC are in opposition to one another. Globally, TB has presented a downward incidence that has been sustained for many years [3]. In China, the incidence of TB decreased from 107 cases per 100,000 in 2000 to 52 cases per 100,000 in 2022, achieving a mortality reduction of 19% and a 29% reduction in morbidity [14]. In contrast, the incidence and death rates of LC have been continually increasing [8, 9]. Unfortunately, there is limited data on TBLC incidence globally or domestically. Therefore, an evaluation of TBLC prevalence may be helpful for public health control.

Numerous studies have identified an association between TB infection and LC development [13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. A recent meta‐analysis demonstrated that TB increased the risk of LC (relative risk [RR] = 2.170, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83–2.57) including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; RR = 3.57, 95% CI: 2.66–4.79), adenocarcinoma (ADC; RR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.71–3.98), and small cell lung cancer (RR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.54–2.91) [15]. The clinicopathological features of TBLC have not been fully investigated. In a small‐sample study that included 48 patients with active TBLC, the TBLC patients were reported to have a more advanced T stage (T3–4, 70.9% vs. 50.6%, p = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (N2–3, 85.2% vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (M1, 65.9% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.007) compared with patients with LC alone [23]. Patients with coexistent TBLC have also been reported to have lower survival rates than LC patients without TB infection [18, 24, 25]. However, because TB and LC mimic each other in radiology and clinical manifestations, misdiagnosis or diagnostic delay is unavoidable. Thus, identifying risk factors to help with the early and accurate diagnosis of TBLC is of vital clinical significance. Therefore, we conducted this large‐sample, retrospective study to investigate the incidence trend of TBLC and explore the clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors for this condition.

2. Methods

2.1. The Aim, Design, and Setting of the Study

This was a real‐world, single‐center, retrospective analysis of patients with TBLC at Beijing Chest Hospital, the standard authority for the diagnosis and treatment of TB and LC in China.

2.2. Study Population and Data Collection

Patients who were newly diagnosed with LC at Beijing Chest Hospital between 2010 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into TBLC and LC alone (without TB) groups based on the existence of TB infection at the time of the LC diagnosis. Patients with other tumors suspected of TB, extrapulmonary TB, or non‐tuberculosis mycobacteria were excluded from the study. Patient records were retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical records system. Patient data, including age, sex, occupation, marital status, diagnosis year, cancer type, tumor location, tumor stage, tuberculosis diagnosis, pathological type, anti‐TB treatment, anticancer treatment, and complications, were collected.

2.3. Diagnosis of Coexistent TBLC

Owing to the high incidence of TB in China, TB surveillance is routinely conducted during bronchoscopies from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and sputum specimens, and from blood tests and chest computed tomography scans among LC patients. A diagnosis of active TB was confirmed by bacteriologic (smear‐positive, acid‐fast bacilli from sputum, bronchial washing or BALF, or positive culture for TB), pathologic (TB granuloma detected using biopsy or surgical resection), molecular (TB‐PCR and TB‐Xpert), radiographic, and/or clinical evidence. Patients with inactive or latent TB infection were confirmed using medical histories, blood testing, or radiologic evidence. Patients with TBLC were defined as cases with newly diagnosed LC combined with latent or active pulmonary TB. Patients with LC alone were defined as cases with no evidence of latent or active TB at the time of LC diagnosis. We rechecked the examinations of each patient to reduce the possibility of false positive and negative cases.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of TBLC was calculated as the number of new, coexistent TB and LC cases/number of LC patients at risk per 100,000 annually between 2010 and 2022. We curve‐fitted the incidence of TBLC from the entire cohort and different sexes. The comparative incidence rate ratio (IRR) was estimated to be the TB incidence in LC patients/TB incidence in the general population to adjust for the risk of prior tuberculosis exposure. China's annual TB incidence rate in the general population was obtained from the World Health Organization's estimates from 2000 to 2022 [14].

Means and standard deviations were calculated for normally distributed, continuous variables. Medians and interquartile ranges were used for non‐normally distributed data. Comparisons of pathological and clinical characteristics between the TBLC and LC groups were performed using the Student's t‐test for continuous variables and the χ 2 test for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate factors influencing TB infection among LC patients. All statistical analyses were performed using R software and SPSS 24.0. The R package included rms, rmda, and ggplot2 libraries. Statistical significance was set as a two‐sided p‐value < 0.05.

2.5. Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chest Hospital (ID, JS‐2023‐10). Written, informed consent was exempt as no interventions were required in this study.

3. Results

3.1. An Increasing Trend in the Incidence of TBLC

From 2010 to 2022, there were 23,706 patients newly diagnosed with LC and admitted to Beijing Chest Hospital who were included in the study. There were 1427 cases diagnosed with coexistent TB (TBLC, 6.01%), including 387 cases with active TB (1.63%) and 1040 with latent TB (4.39%). The number of LC and TBLC cases steadily increased, with both diseases exhibiting similar trends from 2010 to 2022 (Figure 1A). The annual percentage change (APC) in the incidence was 8.84% for TBLC and 0.40% for LC (p = 0.443). The number of new TBLC cases had a similarly increasing rate in males and females (Figure 1B). However, for patients with LC, female cases showed a more rapidly increasing rate than males (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The annual TBLC incident cases and rates from 2010 to 2022 in China. (A) The annual incidence of TBLC and LC cases from 2010 to 2022. (B and C) The annual incidence of TBLC (B) and LC (C) cases according to gender stratification. (D and E), The annual cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of TBLC in total (D) and in different gender groups (E). (F) The annual comparative incidence rate ratio (IRR) of TB in LC patients/general population. (G and H) The annual CIR of active TBLC in total (G) and in different gender groups (H). (I) The annual comparative IRR of active TB in LC patients/general population.

We used the CIR of TBLC to assess the incidence of TB infection in LC patients. The CIR trend for all TBLC and active TBLC cases presented a short decrease during 2010–2014 but has rapidly increased since 2014 (Figure 1D,G). The CIR of all TBLC cases reached 7027 per 100,000 in 2022. The CIR of active TBLC was 2641 per 100,000 in 2022. In terms of the CIR of TBLC, male prevalence varied considerably over time (Figure 1E,H). Furthermore, our results found that patients with LC had a higher risk of TB (IRR = 92.30, 95% CI: 43.17–141.17), including active TB (IRR = 25.21, 95% CI: 21.54–29.89), compared with the general population. The IRRs of all TBLC and active TBLC cases also presented continually increasing trends over the study years (Figure 1F,I).

3.2. Hospitalization and the Financial Burden of TBLC

We analyzed the hospitalization rate and financial cost of TBLC patients. From 2010 to 2022, a total of 90,131 and 5434 hospital admissions were documented for LC and TBLC patients at our institute, respectively, which presented increasing annual trends for the two diseases (Figure 2A). The number of hospital admissions per LC patient increased over time (Figure 2B). However, the average number of admissions per TBLC patient remained stable during the decade under study and was significantly smaller than that of LC patients (2.09 vs. 3.97 times per patient, p < 0.001; Figure 2C). Similar reduction trends in admission days per case during an entire treatment course and for each admission were observed in TBLC and LC patients (Figure 2D–F). In 2022, each TBLC patient spent an average of 21.29 total days in the hospital, with an average of 3.80 days per hospital admission—similar to that of LC patients (Figure 2G–I).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hospitalization and financial burden of TBLC and LC patients from 2010 to 2022. (A–C) Hospitalization times for patients with TBLC and LC. The annual total hospitalization times (A), mean hospitalization times per case (B), and a comparison between patients with TBLC and LC (C). (D–F) Number of hospitalized days for patients with TBLC and LC. Total hospitalized days per case (D), mean number of hospitalized days per case per admission (E), and a comparison of the number of hospitalized days per case per admission between patients with TBLC and LC. (G–M) Hospitalization cost of patients with TBLC and LC. Total hospitalization fees (G), mean hospitalization fee per case (H), mean hospitalization fee per case per hospitalization (J), a comparison between patients with TBLC and LC (K), daily hospitalization fee per case (L), and a comparison between patients with TBLC and LC (M). ns, not significant; ****p < 0.0001.

We calculated that 96.0 million and 5.9 million yuan were spent treating LC and TBLC patients annually, respectively. The medical expenditure per patient was 100.6 thousand yuan for TBLC and 105.6 thousand yuan for LC (p = 0.687, Figure 2G–I). With a reduction in the length of stay for LC and TBLC patients, the medical expenditure per case and per day gradually increased annually, with no significant difference between the two groups of patients (Figure 2J–M).

3.3. Clinical and Pathological Features of TBLC

Patient baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The male‐to‐female ratio (MFR) for TBLC and LC was 2.82:1 and 1.59:1, respectively (Figure 3A). Because of the relatively more rapid increase of LC incidence in females than males, the MFR has gradually decreased since 2015 (Figure 3B). However, for TBLC, the change in the MFR was more complicated, partly owing to the higher mobility of the male population (Figure 3B). The mean age of TBLC patients was 63.61 ± 10.46 years, which was higher than that of LC patients (61.08 ± 10.77 years, p < 0.001; Figure 3D–E). Rejuvenation of LC rather than TBLC was also observed because the mean age of LC patients has decreased in recent years (Figure 3C).

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics.

Variables Total, n (%) (N = 23,706) LC, n (%) (N = 22,279) TBLC, n (%) (N = 1427) p
Age, Mean ± SD 61.23 ± 10.77 61.08 ± 10.77 63.61 ± 10.46 < 0.001
Gender < 0.001
Male 14,738 (62.17) 13,685 (61.43) 1053 (73.79)
Female 8968 (37.83) 8594 (38.57) 374 (26.21)
Marital status 0.479
Unmarried 342 (1.44) 315 (1.41) 27 (1.89)
Married 21,540 (90.86) 20,244 (90.87) 1296 (90.82)
Widowed 1391 (5.87) 1311 (5.88) 80 (5.61)
NA 433 (1.83) 409 (1.84) 24 (1.68)
Ethnic group 0.752
Han 22,484 (94.85) 21,128 (94.83) 1356 (95.02)
Others 1222 (5.15) 1151 (5.17) 71 (4.98)
First visiting department < 0.001
Surgical 11,163 (47.09) 10,850 (48.70) 313 (21.93)
Medical 8620 (36.36) 7966 (35.76) 654 (45.83)
Others 3923 (16.55) 3463 (15.54) 460 (32.24)
Primary imaging manifestation < 0.001
Pulmonary shadow/mass 21,619 (91.20) 20,850 (93.58) 769 (53.89)
Pleural effusion 977 (4.12) 532 (2.39) 445 (31.18)
Atelectasis 60 (0.25) 57 (0.26) 3 (0.21)
Pleural lesion 27 (0.11) 24 (0.11) 3 (0.21)
Mediastinal neoplasm 92 (0.39) 89 (0.40) 3 (0.21)
Others 931 (3.93) 727 (3.26) 204 (14.30)
Primary site 0.237
Right lung 13,224 (55.78) 12,403 (55.67) 821 (57.53)
Left lung 9851 (41.55) 9273 (41.62) 578 (40.50)
Bilateral lungs 51 (0.22) 48 (0.22) 3 (0.21)
NA 580 (2.45) 555 (2.49) 25 (1.75)
Lesion location < 0.001
Upper lobe 7934 (33.47) 7293 (32.73) 641 (44.92)
Middle lobe 893 (3.77) 826 (3.71) 67 (4.70)
Lower lobe 11,257 (47.49) 10,778 (48.38) 479 (33.57)
Trans‐lobe 297 (1.26) 235 (1.05) 64 (4.34)
NA 3325 (14.03) 3147 (14.13) 178 (12.47)
Pathology 0.002
SCC 6585 (27.78) 6125 (27.49) 460 (32.24)
ADC 12,422 (52.40) 11723 (52.62) 699 (48.98)
SCLC 2648 (11.17) 2497 (11.21) 151 (10.58)
Others 2051 (8.65) 1934 (8.68) 117 (8.20)
T‐stage < 0.001
1 5348 (29.81) 5057 (30.62) 291 (20.39)
2 5382 (29.99) 4928 (29.84) 454 (31.81)
3 2319 (12.92) 2117 (12.82) 202 (14.16)
4 4376 (24.39) 4013 (24.30) 363 (25.44)
NA 518 (2.89) 401 (2.43) 117 (8.20)
N‐stage < 0.001
0 7999 (44.58) 7451 (45.11) 548 (38.40)
1 1120 (6.24) 1009 (6.11) 111 (7.78)
2 5325 (29.68) 4917 (29.77) 408 (28.59)
3 3404 (18.97) 3139 (19.01) 265 (18.57)
NA 95 (0.53) 0 (0.00) 95 (6.66)
M‐stage 0.001
0 10,404 (57.98) 9635 (58.34) 769 (53.89)
1 7019 (39.12) 6416 (38.85) 603 (42.26)
NA 520 (2.90) 465 (2.82) 55 (3.85)
TNM stage < 0.001
1 5150 (29.66) 4844 (30.39) 306 (21.44)
2 1220 (7.03) 1083 (6.79) 137 (9.60)
3 3898 (22.45) 3581 (22.47) 317 (22.21)
4 7020 (40.42) 6416 (40.25) 604 (42.33)
NA 78 (0.45) 15 (0.09) 63 (4.41)
Firstline antitumor treatment
Surgery 8588 (36.23) 8067 (36.21) 521 (36.51) 0.819
Chemotherapy 5979 (25.22) 5338 (23.96) 641 (44.92) < 0.001
Radiation 514 (2.17) 434 (1.95) 80 (5.61) < 0.001
Immunotherapy 1823 (7.69) 1737 (7.80) 86 (6.03) 0.015
Targeted therapy 2036 (8.59) 1904 (8.55) 132 (9.25) 0.358
Comorbidity
Diabetes 3276 (13.82) 3055 (13.71) 221 (15.49) 0.060
Hypertension 6114 (25.79) 5734 (25.74) 380 (26.63) 0.455
COPD 300 (1.27) 258 (1.16) 42 (2.94) < 0.001
Obstructive pneumonia 2158 (9.10) 2005 (9.00) 153 (10.72) 0.028
Heart disease 1618 (6.83) 1512 (6.79) 106 (7.43) 0.352
Anemia 1933 (8.15) 1738 (7.80) 195 (13.67) < 0.001
Hypoalbuminemia 2810 (11.85) 2548 (11.44) 262 (18.36) < 0.001
Malnutrition 248 (1.05) 212 (0.95) 36 (2.52) < 0.001
PF 415 (1.75) 368 (1.65) 47 (3.29) < 0.001

Abbreviations: ADC = adenocarcinoma, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, LNM = lymph node metastases, met = metastases, NA = not available, PF = pulmonary fibrosis, SCC = squamous cell carcinoma, SCLC = small cell lung cancer.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison and dynamics of gender and age between patients with TBLC and LC from 2010 to 2022. (A) Comparison of the male‐to‐female ratio (MFR) between patients with TBLC and LC. (B) MFR dynamics of patients with TBLC and LC from 2010 to 2022. (C) Age dynamics of patients with TBLC and LC from 2010 to 2022. (D) Age distribution of patients with TBLC and LC. (E) Comparison of age at diagnosis between TBLC and LC patients according to gender stratification. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

One‐third of TBLC cases were first admitted to departments other than Oncology. Primary complaints were more complicated in TBLC patients than in LC patients, and TBLC patients showed lesions that were predominately located in the upper lobes of the lungs compared with LC patients (44.9% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001), who showed lesions that primarily occurred in lower lung lobes. TBLC lesions were more prevalent in the right upper lobe, followed by the left upper lobe (Figure 4A). SCC was more commonly diagnosed in TBLC than in LC patients (32.2% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.002; Figure 4B). Consistent with LC, ADC was the most common pathological subtype in TBLC patients, and the proportion of ADC has been gradually increasing each year (Figure 4C–D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Clinicopathological characteristics and dynamics of patients with TBLC vs. LC. (A) Heatmap of the proportions of the primary lesion locations of TBLC and LC. (B) Pathological subtypes of TBLC and LC. (C and D) Dynamics of pathological types of TBLC and LC from 2010 to 2022. (E–H) Tumor stage distributions and dynamics of TBLC and LC from 2010 to 2022.

Compared with LC patients, TBLC patients presented a more aggressive illness, with higher proportions of the T2–4 disease (70.9% vs. 67.0%, p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (N+, 54.8% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (M1, 42.4% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.001; Figure 4E). Recently, with the application of LC screening techniques, an increasing number of early‐stage and a decreasing number of advanced‐stage LC and TBLC cases have been detected (Figure 3F–H). We subsequently explored the metastases features of TBLC (Table 2). Our results found that patients with TBLC were more vulnerable to metastases to the mediastinal lymph node (p < 0.001), supraclavicular lymph node (p < 0.001), bones (p < 0.001), lungs (p < 0.001), pleura (p = 0.014), pericardium (p < 0.001), and the celiac lymph node (p = 0.007).

Table 2.

Metastasis of patients with TBLC and LC.

Metastasis Total, N (%) LC, N (%) TBLC, N (%) p
Pilar lymph node 3961 (16.71) 3620 (16.25) 341 (23.90) < 0.001
Mediastinal lymph node 7298 (30.79) 6636 (29.79) 662 (46.39) < 0.001
Bone 2829 (11.93) 2552 (11.45) 277 (19.41) < 0.001
Lung 2921 (12.32) 2650 (11.89) 271 (18.99) < 0.001
Pleura 3099 (13.07) 2882 (12.94) 217 (15.21) 0.014
Liver 1064 (4.49) 994 (4.46) 70 (4.91) 0.432
Brain 1918 (8.09) 1803 (8.09) 115 (8.06) 0.964
Adrenal gland 851 (3.59) 788 (3.54) 63 (4.41) 0.084
Pericardium 376 (1.59) 311 (1.40) 65 (4.56) < 0.001
Celiac lymph node 455 (1.92) 414 (1.86) 41 (2.87) 0.007

3.4. Sequence of TB and LC Occurences

The sequence of TB and LC occurrences may be difficult to discern, especially for those with inactive TB. To avoid uncertainty, we analyzed the diagnosis sequences of the two diseases among patients with active TB (n = 387). Patients were classified into two groups based on the diagnosis date of each disease: LC before TB (n = 84) and LC after TB or simultaneous with LC (n = 303). Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups (Table S1). However, compared with those with simultaneous TBLC or TB before LC, patients who developed TB after LC received more varied anticancer treatments, including chemotherapy (63.10% vs. 41.25%, p < 0.001), radiation (14.29% vs. 6.13%, p = 0.033), and targeted therapies (17.86% vs. 7.26%, p = 0.033). This may have been due to the therapeutic constraints between anti‐TB and anticancer agents.

3.5. Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Influencing TBLC Among LC Patients

TB infections in LC patients make treatment more difficult and lead to a worse prognosis. Additionally, TBLC mimics LC in terms of clinical, pathological, and radiological manifestations, making it challenging to distinguish between coexisting TBLC and LC patients. Therefore, we explored the risk of TB infection among LC patients using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models (Table 3). No significant multicollinearity of factors was demonstrated, with collinearity tolerances of 0.674–0.998, variance inflation factors of 1.002–1.794, and a condition index of 14.336. In the logistic regression analysis, a median age of 63 years was used as the cut‐off value. Our analysis found that older age, male gender, upper lung lobes, more advanced cancer stage, distant metastasis, anemia, malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hepatitis, hypoalbuminemia, and pulmonary fibrosis were risk factors for TBLC. Relevant examinations for TB are recommended for patients with these risk factors.

Table 3.

Logistic regression of risk factors of TBLC.

Variables Univariate Multivariate
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Age, ≥ 63 vs. 63 years 1.42 (1.26–1.40) < 0.001 1.44 (1.25–1.66) < 0.001
Gender, female vs. male 0.54 (0.48–0.61) < 0.001 0.63 (0.54–0.73) < 0.001
Marital, married vs. Unmarried 0.71 (0.47–1.06) 0.095 0.73 (0.46–1.17) 0.195
Pathology (vs. SCC)
ADC 0.70 (0.62–0.79) < 0.001 0.94 (0.80–1.09) 0.408
SCLC 0.79 (0.65–0.96) 0.016 0.82 (0.65–1.03) 0.087
Others 1.00 (0.81–1.23) 0.977 0.92 (0.71–1.19) 0.525
TNM stage (vs. Stage 1)
Stage 2 2.00 (1.62–2.48) < 0.001 1.58 (1.20–2.09) 0.001
Stage 3 1.40 (1.19–1.65) < 0.001 1.49 (1.13–1.97) 0.005
Stage 4 1.49 (1.29–1.72) < 0.001 1.52 (1.12–2.10) 0.001
Location, left vs. right lobe 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.387
Lesion of location (vs. upper lobe)
Middle lobe 0.90 (0.69–1.18) 0.454 1.00 (0.75–1.32) 0.972
Lower lobe 0.51 (0.45–0.58) < 0.001 0.52 (0.45–0.59) < 0.001
Pilar LNM, yes vs. no 1.23 (1.09–1.40) 0.001 0.94 (0.78–1.14) 0.535
Mediastinal LNM, yes vs. no 1.73 (1.55–1.93) < 0.001 4.63 (3.72–5.76) < 0.001
Bone met, yes vs. no 1.44 (1.25–1.65) < 0.001 1.71 (1.42–2.06) < 0.001
Lung met, yes vs. no 1.43 (1.24–1.64) < 0.001 1.80 (1.48–2.19) < 0.001
Plural met, yes vs. no 1.15 (0.99–1.33) 0.077
Liver met, yes vs. no 1.01 (0.79–1.30) 0.917
Brain met, yes vs. no 0.91 (0.75–1.11) 0.371
Adrenal gland met, yes vs no 1.09 (0.84–1.42) 0.519
Pericardium met, yes vs. no 3.13 (2.37–4.14) < 0.001 3.25 (2.38–4.45) < 0.001
Diabetes, yes vs. no 1.12 (0.96–1.30) 0.136
Hypertension, yes vs. no 0.98 (0.87–1.11) 0.801
COPD, yes vs. no 2.46 (1.76–3.45) < 0.001 1.85 (1.23–2.76) 0.003
Hyperlipemia, yes vs. no 0.81 (0.68–0.96) 0.014 0.91 (0.75–1.09) 0.304
Hepatitis, yes vs. no 2.31 (1.71–3.13) < 0.001 2.52 (1.81–3.51) < 0.001
Anemia, yes vs. no 1.66 (1.42–1.95) < 0.001 1.36 (1.11–1.66) 0.003
Hypoalbuminemia, yes vs. no 1.52 (1.32–1.75) < 0.001 1.30 (1.09–1.56) 0.004
Malnutrition, yes vs. no 2.24 (1.56–3.21) < 0.001 1.76 (1.15–2.69) 0.010
PF, yes vs. no 1.89 (1.38–2.58) < 0.001 1.60 (1.13–2.26) 0.008

Abbreviations: ADC = adenocarcinoma, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, LNM = lymph node metastases, met = metastases, PF = pulmonary fibrosis, SCC = squamous cell carcinoma, SCLC = small cell lung cancer.

4. Discussion

The coexistence of TB and LC has been investigated in Lithuania, China, Serbia, Japan, and the Netherlands [26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Pulmonary TB has been reported in 0.9%–13.7% of LC cases globally [31]. The prevalence of TBLC varies depending on spatial and regional factors, and older, male, Asian, and Caucasian LC patients are more prone to developing TB [31, 32]. Cheon et al. conducted an 18‐year, retrospective cohort study in Korea, and a total of 116 out of 3454 LC patients developed TB during the study period, yielding an incidence rate of 3.4% and an IRR of 2804/100,000 person‐years [33]. A cohort study from Japan reported that the cumulative incidence of TB among LC patients after one and 2 years of treatment was 1.15% and 1.38%, respectively [30]. In addition, a high frequency and an upward trend have been reported in the presence of TB in LC patients [34].

This was a large‐sample, retrospective study on coexistent TBLC over a 12‐year period in China. Our results revealed an increasing CIR of TBLC. LC patients had a higher risk of developing TB infection than the general population, especially among older males with anemia, malnutrition, pulmonary fibrosis, or COPD. Furthermore, patients with TBLC were more vulnerable to lymph node metastasis and distant dissemination than LC alone. This study provides insights into the epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of TBLC and places a strong emphasis on prevention and control strategies for the condition.

Coexistent TBLC is recognized as the combined presence of pulmonary TB and LC within an individual. Its incidence is considered to be influenced by the prevalence and disease control of both TB and LC. In the present study (though it accounted for only a small proportion of LC), both the number of new cases and the CIR of TBLC significantly increased per year, similar to LC. Male TBLC prevalence varied considerably over time, partly because of the high mobility of the male population. Furthermore, an increasing number of TBLC patients with Stage I disease have been identified in recent years. Apart from demographic, medical and health resources, and economic factors, other variables such as widely applied low radiation dose chest computed tomography scans, improvement in TB detection techniques, environmental pollution, and smoking may contribute to the increasing incidence of TBLC and its early diagnosis [16, 17, 24, 35, 36, 37].

In the present study, patients with LC had a higher risk of developing an active TB infection, with an IRR of 25.21 (95% CI: 21.54–29.89). Consistent with this, a meta‐analysis of six studies from the United States found that patients with LC had a ninefold higher rate of developing active TB compared with those without LC [37]. Intrinsic immunosuppression of LC itself (the immunosuppressive effects of anticancer treatment) and other host factors may increase the susceptibility of TB in LC patients [22, 23, 38, 39]. Interestingly, the IRR of TB infection among LC patients exhibited a continuously increasing trend over the past decade (Figure 1F,I), suggesting an increase in TBLC that is independent of LC incidence. The application of multiple, enhanced treatment strategies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), reactivate TB infections among LC patients [40, 41, 42]. In addition, the prolonged survival of LC patients may be another factor responsible for this observation.

With an increase in the incidence and economic burden of coexistent TBLC, early diagnosis, and appropriate management are important concerns. Because TB and LC mimic each other in regard to clinical symptoms and radiological evidence, delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis is unavoidable. Older age, male sex, a previous history of TB, and LC treatment were shown to be risk factors for developing an active TB infection [38, 43, 44]. Our results also found that LC patients with malnutrition, preexisting COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, and a more advanced cancer stage were more vulnerable to TB infection. We, therefore, recommend routine TB‐related testing for LC patients with risk factors in TB‐epidemic regions.

TBLC presents unique clinicopathological features in comparison to LC alone. The present study found that there was a higher proportion of SCC among patients with TBLC than LC alone (32.24% vs. 27.49%, p = 0.002), indicating differences in both diseases' pathogenesis and pathological processes. TB infection is a chronic inflammatory reaction of the pulmonary parenchyma that causes irreversible fibrosis and scarring, accompanied by an impaired immune response. It causes the accumulation of genomic changes, and exposure to growth factors can cause multistep, cellular transformations, leading to dysplasia and malignant SCC.

In the present study, TBLC was presented as an aggressive disease with lymph node involvement and distant metastasis. However, based on current studies, the effect of TB infection on the survival of LC patients remains controversial [25, 45, 46, 47]. TB coinfection was an independent predictor of LC mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.40–2.90; p < 0.001) after adjustment for multiple potential confounders [48]. Several studies have also demonstrated an elevated risk of mortality in LC patients with comorbid TB [25, 45, 49]. Additionally, patients with TBLC were found to respond poorly to EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors [18, 50]. However, in a matching study, Ye reported no differences in the median overall survival (OS, 14.0 vs. 17.0 months, p = 0.312) in patients with TBLC (n = 33) and LC alone (n = 66) [46]. Some studies have shown that active TB is an independent predictor of better survival; effective T‐cell immunity near tumors possibly underlies the mechanism [23, 47].

This study has several limitations. First, patient recall and selection bias were inevitable owing to the retrospective nature of the study. To reduce these biases, we rechecked the diagnoses of TB and LC for each patient to minimize false positive and negative cases; hence, the diagnosis of inactive/previous TB not only depended on past medical history but was also confirmed by TB‐relevant tests and examinations. Moreover, structured interviews were used to collect the past medical history of each patient. Second, this single‐center study may not be representative of the entire Chinese population. Third, possible risk factors, such as lifestyle, smoking status, and combined medications, were not available from the electronic system and were not assessed.

5. Conclusion

This study showed that TBLC is a rare condition with increasing incidence in Chinese populations. Older age, male sex, anemia, malnutrition, pulmonary fibrosis, COPD, and more advanced stages are risk factors for developing a TB infection among LC patients. Given the increasing incidence and aggressive nature of TBLC, we recommend routine screening for TB infection in LC patients and more attention be paid to health control and the multidisciplinary treatment of this disease.

Author Contributions

Fei Qi: conceptualization (equal), data curation (lead), formal analysis (lead), investigation (lead), methodology (lead), writing – original draft (lead), writing – review and editing (lead). Hongjie Yang: data curation (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal). Yi Han: data curation (equal), formal analysis (lead), writing – original draft (equal). Yujie Dong: data curation (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), supervision (equal). Fan Zhang: formal analysis (equal), software (equal), validation (equal). Yishuo Wang: data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal). Juan Du: data curation (equal), resources (equal), software (equal), validation (equal), visualization (equal). Yuan Gao: resources (equal), visualization (equal), writing – review and editing (equal). Xuegang Hu: methodology (equal), software (supporting). Liqun Zhang: validation (equal), visualization (equal). Tongmei Zhang: conceptualization (lead), funding acquisition (lead), project administration (equal), supervision (lead), writing – review and editing (equal).

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chest Hospital (approval ID: JS‐2023‐10).

Consent

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting information.

CAI2-4-e70009-s001.docx (24.1KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the valuable cooperation of all doctors, nurses, and authors who participated in this study.

Fei Qi, Hongjie Yang, and Yi Han contributed equally to this study and shared the first authorship.

Data Availability Statement

The study data can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.

References

  • 1.“Global Tuberculosis Report 2023,” World Health Organization, 2023, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240083. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Daley C. L., “The Global Fight Against Tuberculosis,” Thoracic Surgery Clinics 29, no. 1 (2019): 19–25, 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Floyd K., Glaziou P., Zumla A., and Raviglione M., “The Global Tuberculosis Epidemic and Progress in Care, Prevention, and Research: An Overview in Year 3 of the End TB Era,” Lancet Respiratory Medicine 6, no. 4 (2018): 299–314, 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gao L., Li X., Liu J., et al., “Incidence of Active Tuberculosis in Individuals With Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Rural China: Follow‐Up Results of a Population‐Based, Multicentre, Prospective Cohort Study,” Lancet Infectious Diseases 17, no. 10 (2017): 1053–1061, 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30402-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dong Z., Wang Q. Q., Yu S. C., et al., “Age‐Period‐Cohort Analysis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Reported Incidence, China, 2006–2020,” Infectious Diseases of Poverty 11, no. 1 (2022): 85, 10.1186/s40249-022-01009-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Deng L., Zhao F., Li Z., Zhang W., He G., and Ren X., “Epidemiological Characteristics of Tuberculosis Incidence and Its Macro‐Influence Factors in Chinese Mainland During 2014–2021,” Infectious Diseases of Poverty 13, no. 1 (2024): 34, 10.1186/s40249-024-01203-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 74, no. 3 (2024): 229–263, 10.3322/caac.21834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Siegel R. L., Giaquinto A. N., and Jemal A., “Cancer Statistics, 2024,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 74, no. 1 (2024): 12–49, 10.3322/caac.21820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zheng R. S., Chen R., Han B. F., et al., “Cancer Incidence and Mortality in China, 2022,” Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Oncology 46, no. 3 (2024): 221–231, 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Varol Y., Varol U., Unlu M., et al., “Primary Lung Cancer Coexisting With Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 18, no. 9 (2014): 1121–1125, 10.5588/ijtld.14.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Evman S., Baysungur V., Alpay L., et al., “Management and Surgical Outcomes of Concurrent Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer,” Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 65, no. 7 (2017): 542–545, 10.1055/s-0036-1583167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ho J. C. and Leung C. C., “Management of Co‐Existent Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer,” Lung Cancer 122 (2018): 83–87, 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kobashi Y., Fukuda M., Nakata M., and Oka M., “Coexistence of Metastatic Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosed in the Same Cavity,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology 10, no. 5 (2005): 366–370, 10.1007/s10147-005-0498-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.“TB Burden Estimate,” http://www.who.int/tb/country/data/download/en/.
  • 15. Abdeahad H., Salehi M., Yaghoubi A., Aalami A. H., Aalami F., and Soleimanpour S., “Previous Pulmonary Tuberculosis Enhances the Risk of Lung Cancer: Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis,” Infectious Diseases 54, no. 4 (2022): 255–268, 10.1080/23744235.2021.2006772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hong S., Mok Y., Jeon C., Jee S. H., and Samet J. M., “Tuberculosis, Smoking and Risk for Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality,” International Journal of Cancer 139, no. 11 (2016): 2447–2455, 10.1002/ijc.30384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nalbandian A., Yan B. S., Pichugin A., Bronson R. T., and Kramnik I., “Lung Carcinogenesis Induced by Chronic Tuberculosis Infection: The Experimental Model and Genetic Control,” Oncogene 28, no. 17 (2009): 1928–1938, 10.1038/onc.2009.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hwang I. K., Paik S. S., and Lee S. H., “Impact of Pulmonary Tuberculosis on the EGFR Mutational Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma,” Cancer Research and Treatment 51, no. 1 (2019): 158–168, 10.4143/crt.2018.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bhowmik S., Mohanto N. C., Sarker D., and Sorove A. A., “Incidence and Risk of Lung Cancer in Tuberculosis Patients, and Vice Versa: A Literature Review of the Last Decade,” BioMed Research International 2022 (2022): 1702819, 10.1155/2022/1702819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Malik A. A., Sheikh J. A., Ehtesham N. Z., Hira S., and Hasnain S. E., “Can Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Lead to Cancer? Call for a Paradigm Shift in Understanding TB and Cancer,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology 312, no. 5 (2022): 151558, 10.1016/j.ijmm.2022.151558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Xiong K., Sun W., He Y., and Fan L., “Advances in Molecular Mechanisms of Interaction Between Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review,” Translational Lung Cancer Research 10, no. 10 (2021): 4012–4026, 10.21037/tlcr-21-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kolloli A., Kumar R., Singh P., et al., “Aggregation State of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Impacts Host Immunity and Augments Pulmonary Disease Pathology,” Communications Biology 4, no. 1 (2021): 1256, 10.1038/s42003-021-02769-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee H. Y., Kang H. S., Kang J. Y., et al., “Clinical Characteristics and Survival of Patients Concurrently Diagnosed With Lung Cancer and Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis,” Translational Cancer Research 11, no. 8 (2022): 2671–2680, 10.21037/tcr-22-272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zheng L., Yin J., Wang S., et al., “Associated Factors of Co‐Existent Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer: A Case‐Control Study,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 51, no. 4 (2021): e13432, 10.1111/eci.13432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Heuvers M. E., Aerts J. G. J. V., Hegmans J. P., et al., “History of Tuberculosis as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Lung Cancer Survival,” Lung Cancer 76, no. 3 (2012): 452–456, 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wu C. Y., Hu H. Y., Pu C. Y., et al., “Pulmonary Tuberculosis Increases the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Population‐Based Cohort Study,” Cancer 117, no. 3 (2011): 618–624, 10.1002/cncr.25616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Engels E. A., Shen M., Chapman R. S., et al., “Tuberculosis and Subsequent Risk of Lung Cancer in Xuanwei, China,” International Journal of Cancer 124, no. 5 (2009): 1183–1187, 10.1002/ijc.24042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yu Y. H., Liao C. C., Hsu W. H., et al., “Increased Lung Cancer Risk Among Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Population Cohort Study,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology 6, no. 1 (2011): 32–37, 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181fb4fcc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Everatt R., Kuzmickiene I., Davidaviciene E., and Cicenas S., “Incidence of Lung Cancer Among Patients With Tuberculosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Lithuania,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 20, no. 6 (2016): 757–763, 10.5588/ijtld.15.0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Suzuki Y., Imokawa S., Sato J., Uto T., and Suda T., “Cumulative Incidence of Tuberculosis in Lung Cancer Patients in Japan: A 6‐Year Observational Study,” Respiratory Investigation 54, no. 3 (2016): 179–183, 10.1016/j.resinv.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Christopoulos A., Saif M. W., Sarris E. G., and Syrigos K. N., “Epidemiology of Active Tuberculosis in Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review,” Clinical Respiratory Journal 8, no. 4 (2014): 375–381, 10.1111/crj.12094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Leung C. Y., Huang H. L., Rahman M. M., et al., “Cancer Incidence Attributable to Tuberculosis in 2015: Global, Regional, and National Estimates,” BMC Cancer 20, no. 1 (2020): 412, 10.1186/s12885-020-06891-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Cheon J., Kim C., Park E. J., et al., “Active Tuberculosis Risk Associated With Malignancies: An 18‐Year Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea,” Journal of Thoracic Disease 12, no. 9 (2020): 4950–4959, 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kim H. W., Kim J. S., and Lee S. H., “Incidence of Tuberculosis in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ‐ A Nationwide Population‐Based Cohort Study,” Lung Cancer 158 (2021): 107–114, 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Long J., Zhai M., Jiang Q., Li J., Xu C., and Chen D., “The Incidence and Mortality of Lung Cancer in China: A Trend Analysis and Comparison With G20 Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” Frontiers in Oncology 13 (2023): 1177482, 10.3389/fonc.2023.1177482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Liao K. M., Shu C. C., Liang F. W., et al., “Risk Factors for Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” Journal of Cancer 14, no. 4 (2023): 657–664, 10.7150/jca.81616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cheng M. P., Chakra C. N. A., Yansouni C. P., et al., “Risk of Active Tuberculosis in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 64, no. 5 (2017): 635–644, 10.1093/cid/ciw838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kim D. K., Lee S. W., Yoo C. G., et al., “Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Responses of Tuberculosis in Patients With Malignancy Receiving Anticancer Chemotherapy,” Chest 128, no. 4 (2005): 2218–2222, 10.1378/chest.128.4.2218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Abudureheman M., Simayi R., Aimuroula H., et al., “Association of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis L‐formmpb64 Gene and Lung Cancer,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 23, no. 1 (2019): 113–120, 10.26355/eurrev_201901_16755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Tezera L. B., Bielecka M. K., Ogongo P., et al., “Anti‐PD‐1 Immunotherapy Leads to Tuberculosis Reactivation via Dysregulation of TNF‐α,” eLife 9 (2020): e52668, 10.7554/eLife.52668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Fujita K., Terashima T., and Mio T., “Anti‐PD1 Antibody Treatment and the Development of Acute Pulmonary Tuberculosis,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology 11, no. 12 (2016): 2238–2240, 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Suliman A. M., Bek S. A., Elkhatim M. S., et al., “Tuberculosis Following Programmed Cell Death Receptor‐1 (PD‐1) Inhibitor in a Patient With Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer. Case Report and Literature Review,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 70, no. 4 (2021): 935–944, 10.1007/s00262-020-02726-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Otoshi R., Ikeda S., Kaneko T., et al., “Treatment Strategies for Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer With Comorbid Respiratory Disease; Interstitial Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Tuberculosis,” Cancers 16, no. 9 (2024): 1734, 10.3390/cancers16091734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tamura A., “Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer,” Kekkaku [Tuberculosis] 91, no. 1 (2016): 17–25, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27192776. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Jian Z. H., Huang J. Y., Ko P. C., et al., “Impact of Coexisting Pulmonary Diseases on Survival of Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma: A STROBE‐Compliant Article,” Medicine 94, no. 4 (2015): e443, 10.1097/MD.0000000000000443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ye M. F., Su S., Huang Z. H., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent Anti‐Tuberculosis Treatment and Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients With Co‐Existent Tuberculosis,” Annals of Translational Medicine 8, no. 18 (2020): 1143, 10.21037/atm-20-5964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kuo C. H., Lo C. Y., Chung F. T., et al., “Concomitant Active Tuberculosis Prolongs Survival in Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Study in a Tuberculosis‐Endemic Country,” PLoS One 7, no. 3 (2012): e33226, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Leung C. C., Hui L., Lee R. S. Y., et al., “Tuberculosis Is Associated With Increased Lung Cancer Mortality,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 17, no. 5 (2013): 687–692, 10.5588/ijtld.12.0816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhou Y., Cui Z., Zhou X., et al., “The Presence of Old Pulmonary Tuberculosis Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Survival,” Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 8 (2013): 123, 10.1186/1749-8090-8-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Xie Y., Su N., Zhou W., et al., “Concomitant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Impair Survival in Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Receiving EGFR‐Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor,” Cancer Management and Research 13 (2021): 7517–7526, 10.2147/CMAR.S326349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information.

CAI2-4-e70009-s001.docx (24.1KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The study data can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.


Articles from Cancer Innovation are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Ltd. on behalf of Tsinghua University Press

RESOURCES