Abstract
Cell fate decisions, such as proliferation, differentiation, and death, are driven by complex molecular interactions and signaling cascades. While significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular determinants of these processes, historically, cell fate transitions were identified through light microscopy that focused on changes in cell morphology and function. Modern techniques have shifted toward probing molecular effectors to quantify these transitions, offering more precise quantification and mechanistic understanding. However, challenges remain in cases where the molecular signals are ambiguous, complicating the assignment of cell fate. During viral infection, programmed cell death (PCD) pathways, including apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis, exhibit complex signaling and molecular cross-talk. This can lead to simultaneous activation of multiple PCD pathways, which confounds assignment of cell fate based on molecular information alone. To address this challenge, we employed deep learning–based image classification of dying cells to analyze PCD in single herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1)-infected cells. Our approach reveals that despite heterogeneous activation of signaling, individual cells adopt predominantly prototypical death morphologies. Nevertheless, PCD is executed heterogeneously within a uniform population of virus-infected cells and varies over time. These findings demonstrate that image-based phenotyping can provide valuable insights into cell fate decisions, complementing molecular assays.
A challenge in quantitative microscopy lies in translating visual observations into quantifiable parameters that can be evaluated and compared, particularly for phenotypes that manifest as morphological changes. While some phenotypes can be associated with measurable biochemical molecules, such signals are often ambiguous.
Deep learning–based image analysis was utilized to develop new approaches for generating large datasets that represent the biological diversity within the data. This pipeline was used to evaluate heterogeneity and flexibility in PCD during viral infection.
This microscopy and image analysis pipeline enables the study of cell death fates in various biological contexts, complementing molecular assays.
INTRODUCTION
Cell fate decisions—such as proliferation, differentiation, or death—are the result of complex molecular interaction networks and signaling cascades. Although today we know a great deal about the molecular species that signify major cell fate and state transitions, historically, such transitions were visualized by microscopy and defined by changes in morphology or function.
As our understanding of the signaling pathways governing cellular decisions deepened, morphology-based classification gradually gave way to techniques that probe for key molecular effectors. These assays offer precise, quantifiable biological data, whereas cell images remain complex, heterogeneous, and often require specialized expertise to interpret. However, despite the advantages of molecular probe-based assays, signaling can be ambiguous and context dependent, making it difficult to assign cell phenotype or fate from molecular data alone.
Ambiguity in signaling can arise from various factors: technical limitations, where some molecules are challenging to measure accurately; biological promiscuity, where similar downstream signals can be activated by different upstream triggers; biological stochasticity, where fate commitment is driven by inherently unpredictable biochemical noise; or contextual variations, where the same signals may lead to different outcomes in distinct environments. Furthermore, many cell fate decisions are driven by multiple signals that are difficult to measure simultaneously in single cells.
We previously studied the timing of commitment to programmed cell death (PCD) during viral infection, and discovered that it is well described by a memoryless exponential process (Oyler-Yaniv et al., 2021). Consequently, the fates of individual cells cannot be deduced from their current state. PCD is a conserved form of defense against viruses and other intracellular pathogens, which effectively short circuits the pathogen's life cycle and restricts spread (Jorgensen et al., 2017). Aside from the timing of cell death, the PCD decision involves a choice between multiple different PCD types.
The three major types of PCD that occur during viral infection—apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis—differ in the molecular circuits that control their execution, cell morphology preceding death, and on their ability to stimulate inflammation (Ketelut-Carneiro and Fitzgerald, 2022). While apoptosis is considered anti-inflammatory or immunologically silent, necroptosis and pyroptosis, both lytic forms of PCD, are highly inflammatory due to the release of proinflammatory cytokines and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Elevated levels of lytic cell death during infection are associated with more severe symptoms, impaired tissue function, and hyperinflammation (Rodrigue-Gervais et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2017; Karki et al., 2021, 2022; Junqueira et al., 2022; Sefik et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2024). It is therefore important to be able to measure—and potentially control—the execution of PCD fates during viral infection. However, there is significant crosstalk and promiscuity in PCD signaling, making it challenging to ascertain how cells ultimately die (Snyder and Oberst, 2021).
Given that unique and stereotypic death-associated morphologies are defining characteristics of each PCD type, we reasoned that morphology may be useful to distinguish cell death modes during infection (Ketelut-Carneiro and Fitzgerald, 2022). However, extracting morphological information from images of cells in a systematic and scalable manner is difficult. In recent years, deep learning–based image classification tools have revolutionized computational image analysis (Moen et al., 2019). In instances where ground truth data are available, models can be trained to make classifications directly from image pixels. This presents an opportunity to automate—and therefore dramatically scale up—cellular phenotyping that is otherwise accomplished manually by trained personnel. These models offer rapid and accurate performance on routine tasks such as automated segmentation of nuclei and dead cell identification in cultured cells and in more complex tissues and embryos (La Greca et al., 2021; Stringer et al., 2021; Kabir et al., 2022; Villars et al., 2023). More recently, they have been applied to identify more subtle and complex cellular phenomena such as cell cycle, senescence, stem cell differentiation, and metastatic potential (Waisman et al., 2019; Zaritsky et al., 2021; Heckenbach et al., 2022; Jose et al., 2024).
Motivated by these rapid advancements, we used a combination of microscopy and deep learning–assisted image analysis to study PCD signaling and execution in single herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1)-infected fibroblasts. We find that virus-infected cells often activate multiple PCD signaling pathways simultaneously. Despite promiscuity in signaling, dying cells adopt heterogeneous, yet prototypical morphologies, indicating commitment to a particular death fate. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that the different PCD pathways are functionally redundant, such that cells can flexibly switch between them. However, blocking of caspases, which drive apoptosis, led to fractional killing, whereas blocking receptor-interacting protein kinases 1 (RIP1), which drives necroptosis, delayed execution of both apoptosis and necroptosis. In neither case did we observe functional compensation by the intact pathways. In summary, we used deep learning–based image classification of PCD fates during infection to overcome limitations imposed by ambiguity in the upstream signaling network. We expect this strategy to continue enabling new insights in cell fate decisions rooted in cell morphology, in addition to molecular machinery.
RESULTS
Single, virus-infected cells activate more than one death signaling pathway simultaneously
Infection with HSV-1 has been reported to activate both apoptosis and necroptosis depending on the cell type and context (Guo et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2015). Further, bulk pull-down assays have shown that HSV-1 and other pathogens can lead to the physical association of effector proteins from both death pathways (Lee et al., 2021). These observations suggest that during infection, both apoptosis and necroptosis may be activated simultaneously. We therefore wanted to examine the activation of apoptotic and necroptotic signaling pathways within single HSV-1–infected cells.
To do so, we visualized the activation of terminal effector proteins in the apoptotic and necroptotic signaling pathways: cleaved caspase 3 (Cl Casp 3) and phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (pMLKL) (Galluzzi et al., 2018). During apoptosis, procaspase 3 is cleaved into its active form by the initiator caspase 8. Cl Casp 3 is referred to as the executioner caspase because it digests many cellular proteins during the final stage of apoptosis. During necroptosis, MLKL is phosphorylated by the receptor-interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIP1/3), leading to its oligomerization and pore formation in the plasma membrane, ultimately resulting in cell lysis.
As controls, we visualized Cl Casp 3 and pMLKL in mouse 3T3 fibroblasts treated with tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), an initiator of extrinsic apoptosis; doxorubicin, an activator of intrinsic apoptosis; or TNFα combined with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-Vad(Ome)-FMK (ZVad), which activates necroptosis (Vercammen et al., 1998; Gewirtz, 1999; Li and Beg, 2000; Micheau and Tschopp, 2003; Zhang et al., 2009). Our data show that each treatment causes activation of either Casp 3 or MLKL, but not simultaneous activation of both (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 1:
Virus-infected cells simultaneously activate both apoptotic and necroptotic signaling pathways. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of mouse fibroblasts treated with the indicated compounds and stained for either Cl Casp 3, phosphorylated MLKL (pMLKL), or an isotype control. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of HSV-1–infected mouse fibroblasts stained for both Cl Casp 3 and pMLKL simultaneously. (C) Quantification of the total proportion of either HSV-1 VP26-positive or -negative cells that are positive for either PCD signaling marker, or both markers. The error bars show the s.e.m. of four independent experiments. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of HSV-1–infected mouse fibroblasts stained for either cleaved caspase 8 (Cl Casp 8), or pRIP. All images are representative of results from at least three independent experiments.
We next infected fibroblasts with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 with HSV-1, strain KOS-VP26-mCherry, where mCherry is fused to the viral small capsid protein VP26 (Etienne et al., 2017). Immunofluorescence staining revealed that, unlike the control treatments, a majority of VP26-positive infected cells stain positive for both Cl Casp 3 and pMLKL (Figure 1, B and C). Eighty-five percent of VP26-negative cells are negative for all programmed death pathways; however, a small percentage is positive for both markers or pMLKL alone. As VP26 is a late-stage viral protein, it is likely that some VP26-negative cells that stain positive for death markers are in early stages of infection that cannot be visualized using VP26 reporter viruses (Knipe and Howley, 2007). This is supported by the observation that uninfected control cells are negative for death markers, and that a fraction of cells negative for viral VP26-mCherry stain positive for the immediate-early viral protein ICP4 (Figure 1A; Supplemental Figure S1, A and B). Staining for upstream markers of the apoptotic and necroptotic pathways—Cl Casp 8 and phosphorylated RIP1 (pRIP), respectively—further supports the idea that these pathways are heterogeneously activated, both across a population of virus-infected cells and within individual infected cells (Figure 1D).
Taken together, these data demonstrate that a significant proportion of individual HSV-1–infected cells simultaneously activate both the apoptotic and necroptotic signaling pathways. This overlap in cell death signaling makes it difficult to determine how infected cells ultimately execute cell death. Given that different forms of PCD are associated with unique and distinctive morphologies, we asked whether cell death–associated morphologies could be used to determine the mode of death.
Pharmacologic induction of each of the three major PCD types
To study the execution of PCD during viral infection, where heterogeneity is anticipated, we first established a system to observe the morphologies of each death type in isolation. Although only apoptosis and necroptosis are associated with HSV-1 infection in nonimmune cell types, we also included pyroptosis-inducing compounds in our studies, since published transcriptomic and proteomic datasets confirm that our cells express the core components of all three pathways (Supplemental Figure S2, A and B) (Schwanhäusser et al., 2011).
Next, we treated cells with established pharmacologic treatments that result in uniform activation of each death type (referred to as “prototype conditions”). To induce apoptosis, we treated cells with TNFα, the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX), and a specific inhibitor of RIP1K, Necrostatin-1 (Nec1) (Supplemental Figure S2C) (Degterev et al., 2005, 2008). To induce necroptosis, we treated cells with TNFα, CHX, and the caspase inhibitor ZVad (Vercammen et al., 1998; Li and Beg, 2000; Zhang et al., 2009). In both treatments, CHX promotes the decay of the labile protein c-FLIP, which antagonizes the formation of both the death-inducing signaling complex and the ripoptosome (Irmler et al., 1997; Feoktistova et al., 2011; Roux et al., 2015). To activate pyroptosis, we treated cells with a combination of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and nigericin, a potassium ionophore that leads to inflammasome activation (Mariathasan et al., 2006).
Dead cells were identified using a conventional classifier based on a combination of either or both of the following: 1) an abrupt and sustained increase in nuclear Hoechst intensity, indicating nuclear condensation; and 2) incorporation of Sytox green, indicating loss of membrane integrity (Supplemental Figure S2D). Hoechst labels the nuclei of all cells—live and dead—whereas Sytox green stains the nuclei once the plasma membrane is compromised. Both dyes were used because nuclear condensation often precedes plasma membrane rupture—in some cases by several hours (Supplemental Figure S2D)—so the use of both dyes improves the accuracy of cell death identification.
Each of the cytotoxic prototype treatments induces cell death, yet to varying extents and with varying kinetics (Figure 2, A and B). While the initial onset of death is slightly earlier for necroptosis compared with apoptosis, both treatments result in comparable overall death by 48 h, and the overall death rate is faster for apoptosis. By contrast, pyroptosis is slower, likely reflecting the time needed to upregulate some components of the pathway, accomplished via the LPS priming signal (Bauernfeind et al., 2009). To ensure that our method for assigning death was equally accurate for cells treated with the different cytotoxic prototype conditions and during viral infection, we compared it with manually-annotated data. We used movies of 100 individual tracked cells in each condition, imaged using differential interference contrast (DIC), Hoechst, and Sytox green and identified whether and when each cell died. We then calculated the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of our automated approach, along with the accuracy in calling the time of death (Supplemental Figure S2, E–I). We used a bootstrapping procedure to estimate the associated error (95% confidence interval). Overall, our automated cell death classifier performed well, and did not introduce a strong bias toward specific classes.
FIGURE 2:
Pharmacologic induction of each PCD type. (A) Quantification of cell death over time for each of the different prototype PCD inducing treatments (Apo: TNFα, CHX, Nec1; Necro: TNFα, CHX, ZVad; Pyro: LPS and Nigericin). (B) Quantification of the total fraction of cells dead at 48 h post-treatment. (C) Quantification of extracellular ATP for each of the different prototype treatment conditions. Error bars show the SD of multiple biological replicates.
Finally, we quantified extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in response to the different cytotoxic treatments. ATP is a canonical DAMP released during lytic death that binds to purinergic receptors to mediate inflammation (Linden et al., 2019). This experiment demonstrates that both necroptosis- and pyroptosis-inducing treatments cause significantly greater ATP release than apoptosis, reflecting the lytic nature of these forms of cell death (Figure 2C). These data demonstrate that while 3T3 fibroblasts are predisposed to apoptosis, under different conditions, they are competent to undergo necroptosis and pyroptosis, which lead to the release of inflammatory DAMPs.
An image classifier distinguishes the different forms of PCD based on cellular morphology alone
The different modes of PCD are associated with distinct morphological characteristics (Ketelut-Carneiro and Fitzgerald, 2022). Apoptosis is characterized by membrane blebbing, nuclear shrinkage, and fragmentation, followed by the release of membrane-bound apoptotic bodies. Necroptosis is marked by swollen organelles, rounding of the cell body, and an abrupt rupture of the plasma membrane. Pyroptosis involves intracellular vacuolization and a characteristic “parachute” morphology. Both necroptosis and pyroptosis lead to pore formation—although by distinct pore-forming proteins—which results in osmotic stress, cell swelling, and lysis. To visualize the morphological differences between these types of cell death, we treated cells with cytotoxic prototype compounds and imaged them using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. Each treatment resulted in consistent and distinct morphologies at the time of cell death that were visually discernible (Figure 3A; Supplemental Movies S1–S3).
FIGURE 3:
An CNN classifier distinguishes the different forms of PCD based on cellular morphology alone. (A) Representative examples of imminently dying apoptotic, necroptotic, and pyroptotic cells from each of the different cytotoxic prototype conditions. (B) Cartoon diagram showing the general approach for training a CNN-based image classifier. Cells are treated with compounds that uniformly induce each PCD type, then imaged over time. Dead cells are identified generally using incorporation of Hoechst and Sytox green. Imminently-dying cells are defined as the image of the cell in the frame just prior to automatic death assignment with Hoechst and Sytox. Then images of single, imminently-dying cells are used to train a CNN-based image classifier. (C) Performance of the classifier during training following pruning of the training data via a multi-model consensus strategy. (D) Logit scores of the train and test data following pruning. (E) Confusion matrix demonstrating model performance following data pruning. Numbers represent the number of cells classified (top) and fraction called correctly (bottom). (F) Occlusion sensitivity for representative cells from each death prototype class. (G) UMAP dimensional reduction of feature space for cells from each class. (H) Representative images of single cells sampled from the indicated points within the UMAP clusters. For all of Figure 3, images of cells used to train, validate, and test the model were aggregated from three independent imaging experiments, each with at least five technical replicates per prototype condition.
Movie S1.
3T3 fibroblasts were treated with apoptosis-inducing compounds TNF-alpha, Cycloheximide, and Necrostatin-1 and imaged over time using DIC microscopy.
Movie S2.
3T3 fibroblasts were treated with necroptosis-inducing compounds TNF-alpha, Cycloheximide, and Z-VAD(Ome)-FMK and imaged over time using DIC microscopy.
Movie S3.
3T3 fibroblasts were treated with pyroptosis-inducing compounds Lipopolysaccharides and Nigericin and imaged over time using DIC microscopy.
Motivated by the observation of distinct death morphotypes, we trained the residual convolutional neural network (CNN) ResNet50 using images of cells that were imminently dying (Figure 3B) (He et al., 2015). Cells were first treated with cytotoxic prototype compounds and imaged over time. As mentioned previously, dead cells were first identified generally by a combination of Hoechst and Sytox green nuclear intensities. Prior analyses demonstrate that this step accurately identifies both whether and when a cell dies, and performs well across the death classes (Supplemental Figure S2, E–I). An imminently dying cell image was defined as the image of the cell from the frame just prior (within 40 min) to death. The images of imminently dying cells from each prototype condition were then used as labeled data to train our death mode classifier.
To enhance robustness, the training image datasets were augmented through cropping, rotations, reflections, and intensity adjustments before being applied to model training. After initial training, the datasets were pruned using a consensus strategy, where only images correctly classified with at least 80% confidence by all 10 separately trained models were retained. This approach, a variation of confident learning, helps improve label quality by automatically identifying and removing label errors in the dataset, ensuring the model is trained on accurate prototypical examples (Northcutt et al., 2019). Using this relatively strict cutoff, 70% of the initial training dataset (13,652/19,667) was retained following pruning. Visual inspection revealed that most pruned samples were either from the edge of the imaging field, contained live cells which were misclassified as dead due to floating debris, or contained multiple overlapping cells. The pruned dataset was then used to train a new model, which was subsequently validated and tested on unseen images of prototype cells. Pruning significantly improved both training speed and model performance, evidenced by clearer separation of logit scores between death prototypes and higher precision, recall, and accuracy (Figure 3, C–E; Supplemental Figure S3, A–C; Table 1). Logit scores quantify the probability that a given cell falls into a particular death class. To determine which regions of the images were most critical for model classification, we measured the model's sensitivity to occluding different image areas. Notably, the model was most sensitive to disruptions in the cell body, including the nucleus, cytoplasm, and apoptotic bodies, across all death prototype conditions (Figure 3F; Supplemental Figure S3, D–F). As an additional measure of model interpretability, we used Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping ++ (Grad-CAM++), a state of the art method for determining which areas in an image contribute most to model classification (Supplemental Figure S3, G–I) (Chattopadhyay et al., 2017). These analyses indicate that the model used meaningful cellular morphology rather than irrelevant or spurious features for classification.
TABLE 1:
Model performance statistics.
| Precision | Recall | F1 Score | Support | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apoptosis | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.99 | 954 | 675 |
| Necroptosis | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 1036 | 672 |
| Pyroptosis | 0.97 | 1.0 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 960 | 701 |
| Overall accuracy | 0.91 | 0.99 | ||||||
Single model | model trained on consensus-pruned data
We examined the diversity of death-associated morphologies within each prototype class. To do this, we analyzed the final fully connected layer of the trained model that contained 2048 learned features, and performed dimensional reduction (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection - UMAP) on this feature space. This analysis demonstrates that cells within each prototype death class cluster separately from one another (Figure 3G). Examination of representative cells from within each cluster reveals in-class morphological diversity (Figure 3H). This diversity may arise from differences in the timing of cell death between frames, biological variability in the morphology of each PCD type, or a combination of both. In either case, our model correctly classifies cells dying via each prototypical death mode, even in situations where a human would struggle to do so. In summary, we developed a method for training a highly accurate CNN-based classifier capable of assigning death fate from microscopy images based on cellular morphology alone. Our trained classifier enables us to study variability in death-associated morphologies during viral infection, where heterogeneous death fates are expected.
Dying, virus-infected cells adopt diverse and variable death-associated morphologies
Our previous work demonstrates that treatment of HSV-1–infected fibroblasts with a combination of Nec1 (RIP1 inhibitor) and ZVad (pan-Caspase inhibitor) dramatically reduces cytotoxicity (Oyler-Yaniv et al., 2021; Sonnett et al., 2024). This indicates that PCD, rather than unregulated necrosis, constitutes the majority of cell death during HSV-1 infection. To examine the morphology of dying, infected cells, we infected cells with HSV-1 strain KOS-VP26-mCherry at a MOI of 10 and imaged them over a 48-h period. This high MOI ensures that ∼90% of cells are infected synchronously from the initial viral exposure, minimizing variability in the timing of infection (Oyler-Yaniv et al., 2021; Sonnett et al., 2024). We also confirmed that infection with a high MOI of HSV-1 leads to widespread activation of the apoptotic and necroptotic signaling pathways, as was observed for lower MOI earlier (Supplemental Figure S4, A–C; Figure 1, B–D). Visual examination of death morphologies in infected cells reveals greater heterogeneity than that observed under prototype conditions (Supplemental Movie S4). This indicates that cell death during viral infection is morphologically diverse. We next used our trained cell death image classifier to systematically examine this variability.
Movie S4.
3T3 fibroblasts were infected with MOI 10 of HSV-1 strain KOS and imaged over time using DIC microscopy.
We used our trained classifier to quantify the mode of cell death of imminently dying, virus infected cells. We projected the multi-dimensional feature space from imminently dying, virus infected cells onto a UMAP of prototype cells (Figure 3G), color-coding based on the timing of death postinfection (Figure 4A). Most dying cells are morphologically similar to necroptotic and apoptotic prototype cells, rather than pyroptotic prototypes. This is consistent with the observation that pyroptosis is more common in innate immune cell types, such as macrophages, and that our fibroblasts are not predisposed to undergo pyroptosis (Figure 2, A–B). We confirmed that HSV-1–infected cells activate the inflammasome, as has been shown previously for other fibroblastic cells (Supplemental Figure S4D) (Johnson et al., 2013). Visual examination of representative dying, HSV-1–infected cells from each cluster shows that cells are morphologically similar to dying prototype cells, and that there is comparable heterogeneity within each death morphotype (Figure 4B).
FIGURE 4:
Virus-infected cells execute heterogeneous forms of PCD. (A) UMAP dimensional reduction of feature space for cytotoxic prototype-treated cells, with virus-infected cells overlaid on top. Note that this panel includes the same data and representation as Figure 3G, but modified to include virus-infected cells. (B) Representative images of single, dying HSV-1–infected cells sampled from the indicated points within the UMAP clusters. Note that these images show different cells (dying, virus-infected rather than prototype-treated cells) than those shown in Figure 3H. (C) Logit scores of test data from cytotoxic prototype-treated cells, with virus-infected cells overlaid on top. Small time-colored circles represent single virus-infected cells, while the larger time-colored circles represent the average classification for each timepoint. Note that this panel includes the same data and representation as Figure 3D, but modified to include virus-infected cells. (D) Kinetics of cell death for virus-infected cells treated with the vehicle control, ZVad, or Nec1. (E) Total proportion of virus-infected cells classified as apoptotic, necroptotic, or pyroptotic with or without ZVad or Nec1 treatment, over the course of the 48 h experiment. (F–H) Kinetics of cell classification as apoptotic (F), necroptotic (G), or pyroptotic (H) for virus-infected cells treated with the vehicle control, ZVad, or Nec1. For all of Figure 4, images of virus-infected cells were aggregated from two independent experiments, each with at least 10 technical replicates per treatment.
Logit scores, which quantify the probability that a given cell falls into each class, from imminently dying, virus-infected cells primarily overlap with prototypical apoptotic and necroptotic cells, with a much smaller fraction falling into the pyroptosis cluster (Figure 4C). These data show that necroptosis is the predominant form of death early during infection, whereas apoptosis occurs later. This is consistent with reports that ICP6, an early-expressed HSV-1 protein, directly interacts with mouse RIP1 and RIP3 to initiate necroptotic signaling (Huang et al., 2015). Over the course of 48 h, roughly 38%, 53%, and 8% of cells are classified as apoptotic, necroptotic, or pyroptotic, respectively (Figure 4D). These data demonstrate that HSV-1–infected cells execute variable and dynamic modes of PCD.
It has been proposed that cross-talk between the different PCD pathways allows dying cells to flexibly switch to a different pathway if one is blocked (Snyder and Oberst, 2021). To test the flexibility of infected cells in switching between death pathways, we infected cells with HSV-1 and treated them with either a caspase inhibitor (ZVad) or a RIP1K inhibitor (Nec1). Caspase inhibition triggered significantly faster, yet reduced overall cell death compared with cells treated with the vehicle control (Figure 4D). Conversely, inhibiting RIP delayed the onset of cell death compared with the vehicle control, although a similar overall fraction of cells eventually died by 48 h postinfection. This result is consistent with observations that genetic ablation of RIP3 delays and reduces—rather than switches—overall cell death during infection of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) or lung epithelial cells with influenza types A and B (Nogusa et al., 2016). These results show that, contrary to the idea of full redundancy between these pathways, caspase- and RIPK-dependent forms of PCD are not able to substitute for each other during infection, indicating that these death programs are not fully compensatory.
We next used our classifier to test whether the application of caspase or RIPK inhibitors alters the proportion of cells undergoing each type of cell death. Compared with the control, caspase inhibition significantly reduced the fraction of cells classified as apoptotic and increased the proportion classified as necroptotic (Figure 4D). Conversely, although RIP inhibition delays cell death, it does not affect the overall frequency of cells classified as necroptotic throughout the experiment (Figure 4, D and E).
Finally, we used our cell death classifier to evaluate the kinetics of the different PCD pathways over time and with pharmacologic inhibition of either RIP or caspases. An advantage of our approach is the analysis of kinetics, which has been shown to provide much more mechanistic insight into cell death processes than static quantification (Forcina et al., 2017; Inde et al., 2020). In control cells, necroptosis strongly predominates early during infection, whereas the proportion of apoptotic cells increases over time (Figure 4, A, C, F, and G). While caspase inhibition potently favors necroptosis over apoptosis in the cells that died, the overall reduction in death implies that cells that were destined to apoptosis simply survived, rather than switched to necroptosis. Adding a RIP inhibitor delayed the onset of both necroptosis and apoptosis, but did not significantly alter the fraction of cells dying by different modes. The modest effect of RIP inhibition on apoptosis is consistent with reports that RIP can direct a caspase-independent form of apoptosis specifically during viral infection (Nogusa et al., 2016). Neither caspase nor RIP inhibition altered the proportion of cells that undergo pyroptosis (Figure 4H).
Overall, these data show that viral infection triggers diverse PCD pathways within a uniform population of cells. Necroptosis is the dominant mode of cell death early in the infection, but apoptosis becomes more prevalent as the infection progresses. While inhibiting caspases shifts the proportion of death modes from apoptosis to necroptosis, that shift can be explained by a fractional killing effect, where apoptosis-destined cells survive. Inhibiting RIP simply delays cell death without changing the type of PCD. Additionally, neither treatment affected the proportion of cells undergoing pyroptosis. These findings suggest that, although the population as a whole exhibits plasticity in the activation of different PCD pathways, individual cells show limited flexibility in switching between modes. Therefore, distinct PCD mechanisms provide overall adaptability during infection, but single cells are constrained in their ability to alter their death fate.
DISCUSSION
Molecular measurements of signaling pathways and gene expression are the workhorse of biological research, but can fall short in determining cell fate. This is especially true when multiple cell signaling pathways are activated in parallel, but only one is fully executed. We found that PCD during viral infection is a prime example of this complexity, as many infected cells show activation of both apoptotic and necroptotic signaling pathways (Figure 1). Historically, microscopy-based morphology assessments could be used to distinguish execution of these two different PCD types, but were limited by lower throughput and reliance on human expertise. Recent advances in computer vision now offer an opportunity to integrate morphological data back into biological research in a systematic and scalable way (Moen et al., 2019).
To build a robust morphology-based classifier, it was crucial to create accurate training data that captured heterogeneity without introducing mislabeled samples. We treated cells with drugs that selectively induce apoptosis, necroptosis, or pyroptosis, then used automated image analysis and confident learning to prune incorrect labels from the dataset (Northcutt et al., 2019) (Figures 2 and 3). By training a residual neural network (ResNet) on this refined data, we were able to accurately classify cells based on their mode of death (Figure 3) (He et al., 2015). This approach builds on past work that utilized feature extraction, as opposed to pixel-level classification—or holographic microscopy to distinguish different death modes (Barker et al., 2020; Vicar et al., 2020; Verduijn et al., 2021). Our results showed that HSV-1–infected fibroblasts primarily died via necroptosis early on, with apoptosis becoming more prevalent later in infection (Figure 4). Importantly, inhibiting caspases did not cause cells to switch to necroptosis, and vice versa, challenging the notion of functional redundancy in death pathways during infection.
A current limitation of our approach is that it relies on cell segmentation and tracking, and on a separate conventional classifier which uses membrane permeabilization and nuclear condensation as general indicators of cell death. Future work will expand this method to allow one-shot classification of both death status and death type from a single snapshot of label-free images. Secondly, our pipeline currently quantifies single timepoint images. The dynamic nature of programmed cell death suggests that more can be learned from classifying movies of individual dying cells as they traverse different PCD processes.
This approach overcomes the limitations of manually annotated datasets, which tend to be morphologically uniform and less representative of real data variability. By combining a pharmacological strategy with computational dataset pruning, we generated a more accurate classifier. Our findings suggest that cells are predisposed to specific death modes and have limited ability to switch when one pathway is blocked. This “bet-hedging” strategy might help the population resist viral spread, as some infected cells will die regardless of which pathway the virus targets. As is the case for many other biological systems, the cell death decision is likely governed by a kinetic “winner-takes-all” mechanism, where fate is triggered once key regulatory molecules reach critical levels (Elowitz and Leibler, 2000; Carniol et al., 2004; Feinerman et al., 2008; Spencer et al., 2009, 2013; Roux et al., 2015). Such a process can be biased by natural variation in the baseline expression of signaling cascade proteins.
Our experimental and computational framework could be extended to study other processes involving fate-associated morphologies, such as mitosis, differentiation, and others. In summary, deep learning–based image classification improves the accuracy and scalability of cell death assignment from microscopy data. We expect this approach to enhance and complement existing molecular assays that probe for biochemical evidence of distinct PCD fates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and culture conditions
NIH 3T3 and Vero cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (#CRL-1658 and #CCL-81), and grown at 37°C and 5% CO₂ in a humidified incubator. Cells were grown in MEM, supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 2mM L-glutamine.
Cytotoxic prototype treatments
To induce apoptosis, cells were treated with a combination of 10 ng/ml mouse TNFα (Peprotech), 30 µM Nec1 (Sigma-Aldrich); and 3 µg/ml CHX (Sigma-Aldrich). To induce necroptosis, cells were treated with a combination of 10 ng/ml mouse TNFα, 30µM Z-VAD(Ome)-FMK (Cayman Chemical), and 3 µg/ml CHX. To induce pyroptosis, cells were treated with a combination of 250 ng/ml K12 E. coli-derived LPS (Invivogen) and 10 µM Nigericin (Invivogen).
Viruses and viral propagation
HSV-1 strain KOS bearing fluorescent fusion proteins (Etienne et al., 2017) of the small capsid protein VP26 to tdTomato, mCherry, or mCerulean were provided by Dr. Prashant Desai (Johns Hopkins University). To propagate viruses, 4 ✕ 106 Vero cells were seeded in T150 cm2 tissue culture flasks, then infected with HSV-1 strains at an MOI of 0.05. To infect, medium was removed and a 1.5 ml suspension of virus in PBS was added. After rocking briefly, the flask was transferred to 37°C and rocked every 10 min. After 1 h, 45 ml of growth medium was added and incubated for 2 d at 37°C. After 2 d, cells were detached by shaking/tapping, and then pelleted for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a conical tube and kept on ice. The remaining cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of growth medium, and cells were lysed by repeatedly pushing through a 1.5 ml syringe. A total of 8 ml of growth medium was added to the lysate, and clarified by spinning for 10 min at 4°C. The two supernatant sources were then combined and centrifuged in a Beckman Coulter Optima L-100XP Ultracentrifuge at 40,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the remaining pellet was resuspended in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 10% glycerol to a final volume of 1.8 ml. The virus suspension was then homogenized using a 1.5 ml syringe and stored at −80°C. Viral titers were quantified by standard plaque assays performed in Vero cells.
Immunofluorescence staining
For immunofluorescence, 3.5 ✕ 104 cells were cultured in Nunc Chambered Coverglass 8-well Lab-Tek II plates. Cells were fixed with 1.6% paraformaldehyde for 10 min on ice, then washed with PBS and permeabilized with ice-cold 90% methanol for at least 1 h. For antibodies directed against pRIP or pMLKL, cells were fixed only with ice-cold 90% methanol (Samson et al., 2021). Fixed and permeabilized cells were then washed 3x with PBS, and blocked for 1 h at room temperature. Blocking buffer consists of PBS, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 5% normal human serum (catalogue no.: 009-000-121, Jackson Immunoresearch). Human serum is essential to block nonspecific binding of primary antibodies to HSV-1–infected cells. Cells were stained with antibodies for 30 min to 1 h at room temperature or up to overnight at 4°C. Where, indicated, cells were then washed 3x with blocking buffer, then incubated with secondary antibodies and counterstained with DAPI for 1h at room temperature, light protected. Cells were then washed 3x with blocking buffer and an additional 2x with PBS before imaging.
Primary antibodies
Rabbit anti-pMLKL (clone D6E3G, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-pRIP (clone E9K2A, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-Cleaved Caspase 3 (clone 9661, Cell Signaling Technology), Rabbit anti-Cleaved Caspase 8 (clone D5B2, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-ASC (clone D2W8U, Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti-ICP4 (clone 10F1, Abcam), rabbit IgG isotype control antibody (clone DA1E, Cell Signaling Technology).
Secondary antibodies
Donkey anti-goat F(ab’)2-Alexa647 (catalogue no.: 705-606-147, Jackson Immunoresearch), goat anti-rabbit F(ab’)2-Alexa488 (catalogue no.: 111-546-003, Jackson Immunoresearch), goat anti-mouse F(ab’)2-Alexa647 (catalogue no.: 115-606-003, Jackson Immunoresearch)
Fixed cell microscopy
Images were collected on a confocal Nikon Eclipse Ti2E-inverted microscope equipped with a Nikon CFI Plan Apo λ 20✕, numerical aperture (NA) 0.75 objective lens. Images were acquired with a CrestOptics X-Light V3 light engine and a Photometrics Kinetix camera. All imaging was accomplished using custom automated software written using MATLAB and Micro-Manager.
ATP release assay
The RealTime-Glo Extracellular ATP Assay Reagent was mixed with 10 ml of culture medium (RPMI 1640, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (volume:volume) yielding a 4X reagent. A total of 6.00 ✕ 10⁴ cells were seeded in culture medium in Greiner CELLSTAR 96-well plates and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Cells were then treated with compounds, and 50 µl of 4X RealTime-Glo Extracellular ATP Assay Reagent was added to each well. Cells were then imaged using a BioTek Synergy HTX plate reader.
Time-lapse imaging
A total of 3.5 ✕ 104 cells were seeded in imaging media (MEM - no phenol red/no glutamine, 10% FBS, 10 U/ml Penicillin and 10 µg/ml Streptomycin) in Nunc Lab-Tek II Chambered Coverglass 8-well or 2.5 ✕ 104 cells were seeded in 96-well glass-bottom plate with high performance #1.5 cover glass (CellVis). Cells were labeled with 20 ng/ml Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and death was tracked by incorporation of 1:10,000 Sytox Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images (20✕) were collected on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2-E inverted microscope equipped with a Nikon CFI Plan Apo Lambda 20✕, numerical aperture (NA) 0.75 objective lens. Images were acquired with a Lumencor SOLA SE V-nIR light engine and Hamamatsu ImagEM EM-CCD camera. NIS Elements software was used for image acquisition.
Time-lapse image analysis
Automated image processing and analysis was performed using custom code written in Python. Software is available from the GitHub repository: https://github.com/oylab/oyLabImaging. Briefly, phase correlation–based jitter and drift correction was applied to time-lapse image stacks. Single cells were identified using the Hoechst-labeled nuclear channel, and segmented using the pretrained segmentation model stardist (version 0.8.3, Schmidt et al., 2018), and single cell features were saved. Single cells were then tracked using our custom made tracking software based on the python package lap (Jonker and Volgenant, 1987). Cell death was identified automatically as a sustained (>4 consecutive frames) increase of either the intensity of the nuclear marker Hoechst 33342, indicative of nuclear condensation, or Sytox Green, indicative of membrane rupture, above a user-selected threshold. 128×128 pixel DIC images of individual cells taken from the frame immediately prior to death were saved for deep learning model training. To establish a ground truth dataset for cell death, we manually annotated whether and when death occurred for 100 randomly-selected, individual tracked cells per death condition. Automatic death assignment was then compared to this ground truth dataset, using bootstrapping to estimate the associated error.
ResNet models
Model training and deployment were performed using custom Python code. We implemented transfer learning by using the pretrained ResNet50 model as our base (https://download.pytorch.org/models/resnet50-0676ba61.pth). The model was adapted to accept single 128×128 grayscale inputs and trained on images of imminently dying cells exposed to prototype-inducing drugs. Training was done using stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with Focal Loss (gamma = 2) (Lin et al., 2017). We trained 10 independent models on an identical dataset with a 70/15/15 split for training, validation, and testing, with random shuffling. Data were partitioned on a cell level. Each model was trained for 150 epochs, using a minibatch size of 32 for the training set and 400 for the validation and testing sets. The training set was class-balanced.
After initial training, we pruned incorrectly labeled samples by removing any sample that was not classified as its ground truth label by at least 80% of the models (using softmax probability estimates) across the initial 10 models. The pruned dataset was then used to train a new model using standard Cross Entropy as the loss function and SGD over 500 training epochs. Deployment of the ResNet models was also done with custom Python code, based on the PyTorch distribution. The software is available on GitHub: https://github.com/oylab/oyDL.
Model interpretability
We used two independent methods to verify the interpretability of our model. For Occlusion Sensitivity analysis, we used the python package captum’s implementation attr.Occlusion. For GradMag++, we used pytorch_grad_cam function GradCAMPlusPlus. To capture fine morphological details, which are hallmarks of different PCD programs, in our GradCam++ score, we calculated scores across multiple layers of our network.
Statistical analysis and data presentation
To visualize our classifier outputs, we performed dimensional reduction using UMAP. We generated UMAP representations of the final classifier features by extracting activations from the last fully connected layer, which contains 2048 features measured over the entire pruned dataset. A two-dimensional UMAP representation was fit using 100 neighbors and a minimum Euclidean distance of 0.1. Features extracted from virus infected cells were projected onto the same prototype projection, and were not fit independently.
All relevant data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) or SD. For microscopy images, identical brightness and contrast settings are used in side-by-side images.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Core for Imaging Technology and Education (CITE, HMS) for providing access to microscopes and consultation on imaging conditions, Dr. Talley Lambert (CITE, HMS) for helping with image analysis software development, Dr. Prashant Desai (Johns Hopkins University) for sharing viruses and protocols for their propagation, Drs. Tim Mitchison (HMS), Carlos Lopez (Altos Labs), and all members of the Oyler-Yaniv lab for helpful conversations, and Karla Flores for lab support.
Abbreviations used:
- ATP
adenosine triphosphate
- Cl Casp 3/8
cleaved caspase 3 or 8
- CHX
cycloheximide
- CNN
convolutional neural network
- DAMPs
danger associated molecular patterns
- DIC
differential interference contrast
- GRAD-CAM++
gradient-weighted class activation mapping ++
- HSV-1
herpes simplex virus-1
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- MEFs
mouse embryonic fibroblasts
- MOI
multiplicity of infection
- Nec1
necrostatin-1
- PCD
programmed cell death
- pMLKL
phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein
- ResNet
residual neural network
- RIP1/3
receptor-interacting protein kinases 1 and 3
- SGD
stochastic gradient descent
- TNFα
tumor necrosis factor α
- UMAP
uniform manifold approximation and projection
- ZVad
Z-Vad(Ome)-FMK.
Footnotes
This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E24-10-0438) on January 22, 2025.
REFERENCES
- Barker KL, Boucher KM, Judson-Torres RL (2020). Label-free classification of apoptosis, ferroptosis and necroptosis using digital holographic cytometry. Appl Sci 10, 4439. [Google Scholar]
- Bauernfeind FG, Horvath G, Stutz A, Alnemri ES, MacDonald K, Speert D, Fernandes-Alnemri T, Wu J, Monks BG, Fitzgerald KA, et al. (2009). Cutting Edge: NF-κB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J Immunol 183, 787–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carniol K, Eichenberger P, Losick R (2004). A threshold mechanism governing activation of the developmental regulatory protein sigma F in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 279, 14860–14870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chattopadhyay A, Sarkar A, Howlader P, Balasubramanian VN (2017). Grad-CAM++: Improved visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. arXiv:1710.11063v3.
- Degterev A, Hitomi J, Germscheid M, Ch'en IL, Korkina O, Teng X, Abbott D, Cuny GD, Yuan C, Wagner G, et al. (2008). Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol 4, 313–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degterev A, Huang Z, Boyce M, Li Y, Jagtap P, Mizushima N, Cuny GD, Mitchison TJ, Moskowitz MA, Yuan J (2005). Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury. Nat Chem Biol 1, 112–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000). A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etienne L, Joshi P, Dingle L, Huang E, Grzesik P, Desai PJ (2017). Visualization of herpes simplex virus type 1 virions using fluorescent colors. J Virol Methods 241, 46–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feinerman O, Veiga J, Dorfman JR, Germain RN, Altan-Bonnet G (2008). Variability and robustness in T cell activation from regulated heterogeneity in protein levels. Science 321, 1081–1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Kellert B, Dimitrova DP, Langlais C, Hupe M, Cain K, MacFarlane M, Häcker G, Leverkus M (2011). cIAPs block Ripoptosome formation, a RIP1/caspase-8 containing intracellular cell death complex differentially regulated by cFLIP isoforms. Mol Cell 43, 449–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forcina GC, Conlon M, Wells A, Cao JY, Dixon SJ (2017). Systematic quantification of population cell death kinetics in mammalian cells. Cell Syst 4, 600–610.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, Alnemri ES, Altucci L, Amelio I, Andrews DW, et al. (2018). Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ 25, 486–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gewirtz DA (1999). A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. Biochem Pharmacol 57, 727–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo H, Omoto S, Harris PA, Finger JN, Bertin J, Gough PJ, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES (2015). Herpes simplex virus suppresses necroptosis in human cells. Cell Host Microbe 17, 243–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heckenbach I, Mkrtchyan GV, Ezra MB, Bakula D, Madsen JS, Nielsen MH, Oró D, Osborne B, Covarrubias AJ, Idda ML, et al. (2022). Nuclear morphology is a deep learning biomarker of cellular senescence. Nat Aging 2, 742–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2015). Deep residual learning for image recognition.
- Huang Z, Wu S-Q, Liang Y, Zhou X, Chen W, Li L, Wu J, Zhuang Q, Chen C, Li J, et al. (2015). RIP1/RIP3 binding to HSV-1 ICP6 initiates necroptosis to restrict virus propagation in mice. Cell Host Microbe 17, 229–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inde Z, Forcina GC, Denton K, Dixon SJ (2020). Kinetic heterogeneity of cancer cell fractional killing. Cell Rep 32, 107845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irmler M, Thome M, Hahne M, Schneider P, Hofmann K, Steiner V, Bodmer JL, Schröter M, Burns K, Mattmann C, et al. (1997). Inhibition of death receptor signals by cellular FLIP. Nature 388, 190–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson KE, Chikoti L, Chandran B (2013). Herpes simplex virus 1 infection induces activation and subsequent inhibition of the IFI16 and NLRP3 inflammasomes. J Virol 87, 5005–5018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jonker R, Volgenant A (1987). A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems. Computing 38, 325–340. [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen I, Rayamajhi M, Miao EA (2017). Programmed cell death as a defence against infection. Nat Rev Immunol 17, 151–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jose A, Roy R, Moreno-Andrés D, Stegmaier J (2024). Automatic detection of cell-cycle stages using recurrent neural networks. PLoS One 19, e0297356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Junqueira C, Crespo Â, Ranjbar S, de Lacerda LB, Lewandrowski M, Ingber J, Parry B, Ravid S, Clark S, Schrimpf MR, et al. (2022). FcγR-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection of monocytes activates inflammation. Nature 606, 576–584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabir MA, Kharel A, Malla S, Kreis ZJ, Nath P, Wolfe JN, Hassan M, Kaur D, Sari-Sarraf H, Tiwari AK, et al. (2022). Automated detection of apoptotic versus nonapoptotic cell death using label-free computational microscopy. J Biophotonics 15, e202100310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karki R, Lee S, Mall R, Pandian N, Wang Y, Sharma BR, Malireddi RS, Yang D, Trifkovic S, Steele JA, et al. (2022). ZBP1-dependent inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, and cytokine storm disrupt IFN therapeutic efficacy during coronavirus infection. Sci Immunol 7, eabo6294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karki R, Sharma BR, Tuladhar S, Williams EP, Zalduondo L, Samir P, Zheng M, Sundaram B, Banoth B, Malireddi RKS, et al. (2021). Synergism of TNF-α and IFN-γ triggers inflammatory cell death, tissue damage, and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection and cytokine shock syndromes. Cell 184, 149–168.e17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ketelut-Carneiro N, Fitzgerald KA (2022). Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis-oh my! The many ways a cell can die. J Mol Biol 434, 167378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knipe DM, Howley PM (2007). Fields’ Virology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar]
- La Greca AD, Pérez N, Castañeda S, Milone PM, Scarafía MA, Möbbs AM, Waisman A, Moro LN, Sevlever GE, Luzzani CD, et al. (2021). celldeath: A tool for detection of cell death in transmitted light microscopy images by deep learning-based visual recognition. PLoS One 16, e0253666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee S, Karki R, Wang Y, Nguyen LN, Kalathur RC, Kanneganti T-D (2021). AIM2 forms a complex with pyrin and ZBP1 to drive PANoptosis and host defence. Nature 597, 415–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang K, Barnett KC, Hsu M, Chou W-C, Bais SS, Riebe K, Xie Y, Nguyen TT, Oguin TH, 3rd, Vannella KM, et al. (2024). Initiator cell death event induced by SARS-CoV-2 in the human airway epithelium. Sci Immunol 9, eadn0178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M, Beg AA (2000). Induction of necrotic-like cell death by tumor necrosis factor alpha and caspase inhibitors: novel mechanism for killing virus-infected cells. J Virol 74, 7470–7477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linden J, Koch-Nolte F, Dahl G (2019). Purine release, metabolism, and signaling in the inflammatory response. Annu Rev Immunol 37, 325–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin T-Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollár P (2017). Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 42, 318–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O'Rourke K, Roose-Girma M, Lee WP, Weinrauch Y, Monack DM, Dixit VM (2006). Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature 440, 228–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Micheau O, Tschopp J (2003). Induction of TNF receptor I-mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes. Cell 114, 181–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moen E, Bannon D, Kudo T, Graf W, Covert M, Van Valen D (2019). Deep learning for cellular image analysis. Nat Methods 16, 1233–1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogusa S, Thapa RJ, Dillon CP, Liedmann S, Oguin TH, 3rd, Ingram JP, Rodriguez DA, Kosoff R, Sharma S, Sturm O, et al. (2016). RIPK3 activates parallel pathways of MLKL-driven necroptosis and FADD-mediated apoptosis to protect against influenza A virus. Cell Host Microbe 20, 13–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Northcutt CG, Jiang L, Chuang IL (2019). Confident learning: Estimating uncertainty in dataset labels. arXiv:1911.00068v6.
- Oyler-Yaniv J, Oyler-Yaniv A, Maltz E, Wollman R (2021). TNF controls a speed-accuracy tradeoff in the cell death decision to restrict viral spread. Nat Commun 12, 2992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigue-Gervais IG, Labbé K, Dagenais M, Dupaul-Chicoine J, Champagne C, Morizot A, Skeldon A, Brincks EL, Vidal SM, Griffith TS, et al. (2014). Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein cIAP2 protects against pulmonary tissue necrosis during influenza virus infection to promote host survival. Cell Host Microbe 15, 23–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roux J, Hafner M, Bandara S, Sims JJ, Hudson H, Chai D, Sorger PK (2015). Fractional killing arises from cell-to-cell variability in overcoming a caspase activity threshold. Mol Syst Biol 11, 803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samson AL, Fitzgibbon C, Patel KM, Hildebrand JM, Whitehead LW, Rimes JS, Jacobsen AV, Horne CR, Gavin XJ, Young SN, et al. (2021). A toolbox for imaging RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL in mouse and human cells. Cell Death Differ 28, 2126–2144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt U, Weigert M, Broaddus C, Myers G (2018). Cell detection with star-convex polygons. arXiv:1806.03535v2..
- Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W, Selbach M (2011). Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sefik E, Qu R, Junqueira C, Kaffe E, Mirza H, Zhao J, Brewer JR, Han A, Steach HR, Israelow B, et al. (2022). Inflammasome activation in infected macrophages drives COVID-19 pathology. Nature 606, 585–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snyder AG, Oberst A (2021). The antisocial network: Cross talk between cell death programs in host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 39, 77–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sonnett M, Centofanti E, Boersma S, Brambach M, Peshkin L, Tatavosian R, Oyler-Yaniv A, Oyler-Yaniv J (2024). Synergy between TNFα and proteostatic stress drives cell death and guard immunity.
- Spencer SL, Cappell SD, Tsai F-C, Overton KW, Wang CL, Meyer T (2013). The proliferation-quiescence decision is controlled by a bifurcation in CDK2 activity at mitotic exit. Cell 155, 369–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer SL, Gaudet S, Albeck JG, Burke JM, Sorger PK (2009). Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Nature 459, 428–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stringer C, Wang T, Michaelos M, Pachitariu M (2021). Cellpose: A generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat Methods 18, 100–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vercammen D, Beyaert R, Denecker G, Goossens V, Van Loo G, Declercq W, Grooten J, Fiers W, Vandenabeele P (1998). Inhibition of caspases increases the sensitivity of L929 cells to necrosis mediated by tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med 187, 1477–1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verduijn J, Van der Meeren L, Krysko DV, Skirtach AG (2021). Deep learning with digital holographic microscopy discriminates apoptosis and necroptosis. Cell Death Discov 7, 229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vicar T, Raudenska M, Gumulec J, Balvan J (2020). The quantitative-phase dynamics of apoptosis and lytic cell death. Sci Rep 10, 1566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villars A, Letort G, Valon L, Levayer R (2023). DeXtrusion: automatic recognition of epithelial cell extrusion through machine learning in vivo. Development 150, dev201747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waisman A, La Greca A, Möbbs AM, Scarafía MA, Santín Velazque NL, Neiman G, Moro LN, Luzzani C, Sevlever GE, Guberman AS, et al. (2019). Deep learning neural networks highly predict very early onset of pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Reports 12, 845–859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y-L, Tang H-L, Peng H-R, Zhao P, Qi Z-T, Wang W (2017). RIP3 deficiency ameliorates inflammatory response in mice infected with influenza H7N9 virus infection. Oncotarget 8, 27715–27724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaritsky A, Jamieson AR, Welf ES, Nevarez A, Cillay J, Eskiocak U, Cantarel BL, Danuser G (2021). Interpretable deep learning uncovers cellular properties in label-free live cell images that are predictive of highly metastatic melanoma. Cell Syst 12, 733–747.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D-W, Shao J, Lin J, Zhang N, Lu B-J, Lin S-C, Dong M-Q, Han J (2009). RIP3, an energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis. Science 325, 332–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




