Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982 Oct;331:499–510. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014386

Is action potential duration of the intact dog heart related to contractility or stimulus rate?

Angela J Drake *, Mark I M Noble ‡, Vincent Schouten †, Anthony Seed §, Henk E D J Ter Keurs †, Bjorn Wohlfart ∥
PMCID: PMC1197763  PMID: 7153914

Abstract

1. The contractility (maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure) and action potential duration were measured in intact closed-chest anaesthetized dogs with complete atrioventricular dissociation and β-adrenergic blockade.

2. Measurements were confined to test beats following a 1 sec interval. Prior to the test interval (priming period) a variety of potentiating stimulus trains were introduced.

3. When the frequency of stimulation was increased in the priming period (frequency potentiation), there was an inverse relationship between action potential duration and contractility of the test beat.

4. When the test beat was potentiated by a single beat terminating the priming period with one short interval (post-extrasystolic potentiation), there was no relationship between the action potential duration and contractility of the test beat.

5. Paired pulse stimulation was used for any given frequency to vary contractility by short interval potentiation. For any given frequency of stimulation there was no relationship between action potential duration and contractility of the test beat. For any given value of contractility, action potential duration decreased with increased frequency of stimulation.

6. The introduction of a high frequency train caused a step decrease in action potential duration on the first beat of the train. This was followed by a further slow decline in action potential duration with a time course of over 3 min. These two changes could be dissociated by the introduction during the train of one second interval test pulses, which only showed the slow shortening.

7. The lack of a consistent relationship between action potential duration and contractility of the test beat disagrees with the hypothesis that repolarization is controlled by the activator calcium responsible for the contractility. The action potential shortening associated with increased frequency is related to the frequency change per se.

8. The slow time course of change in action potential duration following an increase in stimulation frequency suggests that these changes are caused by the accumulation of an ion or metabolite, or possibly by changes of activity of the electrogenic Na+—K+ pump.

Full text

PDF
499

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen D. G., Jewell B. R., Wood E. H. Studies of the contractility of mammalian myocardium at low rates of stimulation. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(1):1–17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen D. G., Kurihara S. Calcium transients in mammalian ventricular muscle. Eur Heart J. 1980;Suppl A:5–15. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/1.suppl_1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson P. A., Manring A., Johnson E. A. The force of contraction of isolated papillary muscle: a study of the interaction of its determining factors. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1977 Feb;9(2):131–150. doi: 10.1016/0022-2828(77)90045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Attwell D., Cohen I., Eisner D. A. The effects of heart rate on the action potential of guinea-pig and human ventricular muscle. J Physiol. 1981;313:439–461. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BAUTOVICH G., GIBB D. B., JOHNSON E. A. The force of contraction of the rabbit papillary muscle preparation as a function of the frequency and pattern of stimulation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1962 Dec;40:455–472. doi: 10.1038/icb.1962.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BRAVENY P., KRUTA V. Dissociation de deux facteurs: restitution et potentiation dans l'action de l'intervalle sur l'amplitude de la contraction du myocarde. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1958 Nov;66(4):633–652. doi: 10.3109/13813455809084239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bass B. G. Restitution of the action potential in cat papillary muscle. Am J Physiol. 1975 Jun;228(6):1717–1724. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.228.6.1717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bassingthwaighte J. B., Fry C. H., McGuigan J. A. Relationship between internal calcium and outward current in mammalian ventricular muscle; a mechanism for the control of the action potential duration? J Physiol. 1976 Oct;262(1):15–37. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyett M. R. An analysis of the effect of the rate of stimulation and adrenaline on the duration of the cardiac action potential. Pflugers Arch. 1978 Nov 14;377(2):155–166. doi: 10.1007/BF00582846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyett M. R., Jewell B. R. A study of the factors responsible for rate-dependent shortening of the action potential in mammalian ventricular muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Dec;285:359–380. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyett M. R., Jewell B. R. Analysis of the effects of changes in rate and rhythm upon electrical activity in the heart. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1980;36(1):1–52. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(81)90003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carmeliet E. Repolarisation and frequency in cardiac cells. J Physiol (Paris) 1977;73(7):903–923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Edmands R. E., Greenspan K., Bailey J. C. Role of the premature action potential in contractile potentiation: a study of paired stimulation. Cardiovasc Res. 1972 Jul;6(4):368–374. doi: 10.1093/cvr/6.4.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edmands R. E., Greenspan K., Fisch C. Effect of cycle-length alteration upon the configuration of the canine ventricular action potential. Circ Res. 1966 Sep;19(3):602–610. doi: 10.1161/01.res.19.3.602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elzinga G., Lab M. J., Noble M. I., Papadoyannis D. E., Pidgeon J., Seed A., Wohlfart B. The action-potential duration and contractile response of the intact heart related to the preceding interval and the preceding beat in the dog and cat. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:481–500. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GIBBS C. L., JOHNSON E. A. Effect of changes in frequency of stimulation upon rabbit ventricular action potential. Circ Res. 1961 Jan;9:165–170. doi: 10.1161/01.res.9.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Giebisch G., Weidmann S. Membrane currents in mammalian ventricular heart muscle fibers using a voltage-clamp technique. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Mar;57(3):290–296. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.3.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Glitsch H. G. An effect of the electrogenic sodium pump on the membrane potential in beating guinea-pig atria. Pflugers Arch. 1973 Nov 26;344(2):169–180. doi: 10.1007/BF00586550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenspan K., Edmonds R. E., Fisch C. The relation of contractile enhancement to action potential change in canine myocardium. Circ Res. 1967 Mar;20(3):311–320. doi: 10.1161/01.res.20.3.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Isenberg G. Cardiac Purkinje fibres: [Ca2+]i controls the potassium permeability via the conductance components gK1 and gK2. Pflugers Arch. 1977 Oct 19;371(1-2):77–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00580775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Isnberg G. Is potassium conductance of cardiac Purkinje fibres controlled by (Ca2+)? Nature. 1975 Jan 24;253(5489):273–274. doi: 10.1038/253273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jóhannsson M., Wohlfart B. Cellular calcium as a determinant of action potential duration in rabbit myocardium. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980 Nov;110(3):241–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katzung B. G., Morgenstern J. A. Effects of extracellular potassium on ventricular automaticity and evidence for a pacemaker current in mammalian ventricular myocardium. Circ Res. 1977 Jan;40(1):105–111. doi: 10.1161/01.res.40.1.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. LANGER G. A. CALCIUM EXCHANGE IN DOG VENTRICULAR MUSCLE: RELATION TO FREQUENCY OF CONTRACTION AND MAINTENANCE OF CONTRACTILITY. Circ Res. 1965 Jul;17:78–89. doi: 10.1161/01.res.17.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lab M. J., Yardley J. Electrophysiological differences between apex and base in intact pig ventricle [proceedings]. J Physiol. 1979 Jul;292:62P–63P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahler Y., Rogel S. Interrelation between restitution time-constant and alternating myocardial contractility in dogs. Clin Sci. 1970 Nov;39(5):625–639. doi: 10.1042/cs0390625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Noble M. I., Wyler J., Milne E. N., Trenchard D., Guz A. Effect of changes in heart rat on left ventricular performance in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1969 Feb;24(2):285–295. doi: 10.1161/01.res.24.2.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Olsson B., Varnauskas E., Korsgren M. Further improved method for measuring monophasic action potentials of the intact human heart. J Electrocardiol. 1971;4(1):19–23. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(71)80045-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pidgeon J., Lab M., Seed A., Elzinga G., Papadoyannis D., Noble M. I. The contractile state of cat and dog heart in relation to the interval between beats. Circ Res. 1980 Oct;47(4):559–567. doi: 10.1161/01.res.47.4.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reiter M., Stickel F. J. Der Einfluss der Kontraktionsfrequenz auf das Aktionspotential des Meerschweinchem-Papillarmuskels. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1968;260(4):342–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rumberger E., Reichel H. The force-frequency relationship: a comparative study between warm- and cold-blooded animals. Pflugers Arch. 1972;332(3):206–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steiner C., Kovalik A. T. A simple technique for production of chronic complete heart block in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Nov;25(5):631–632. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1968.25.5.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. TRAUTWEIN W., DUDEL J. Aktionspotential und Mechanogramm des Warmblüterherzmuskels als Funktion der Schlagfrequenz. Pflugers Arch. 1954;260(1):24–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00363777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tritthart H., Kaufmann R., Volkmer H. P., Bayer R., Krause H. Ca-movement controlling myocardial contractility. I. Voltage-, current- and time-dependence of mechanical activity under voltage clamp conditions (cat papillary muscles and trabeculae). Pflugers Arch. 1973 Feb 6;338(3):207–231. doi: 10.1007/BF00587388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Van den Bos G. C., Elzinga C., Westerhof N., Noble M. I. Problems in the use of indices of myocardial contractility. Cardiovasc Res. 1973 Nov;7(6):834–848. doi: 10.1093/cvr/7.6.834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wohlfart B. Relationships between peak force, action potential duration and stimulus interval in rabbit myocardium. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979 Aug;106(4):395–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1979.tb06419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES