Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982 Oct;331:577–597. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014393

A patch-clamp study of bovine chromaffin cells and of their sensitivity to acetylcholine.

E M Fenwick, A Marty, E Neher
PMCID: PMC1197770  PMID: 6296371

Abstract

1. Bovine chromaffin cells were enzymatically isolated and kept in short term tissue culture. Their electrical properties were studied using recent advances of the patch-clamp technique (Hamill, Marty, Neher, Sakmann & Sigworth, 1981). 2. When a patch pipette was sealed tightly to a chromaffin cell ('cell-attached configuration') current wave forms due to intracellular action potentials could be observed. The frequency of the wave forms was altered by changing the pipette potential. When acetylcholine was present in the pipette solution, acetylcholine-induced single channel currents were evident in the patch recording. Action potential wave forms were then often seen to follow acetycholine-induced single channel currents. 3. In the cell-attached configuration, large single channel current events did not resemble square pulses but showed exponential relaxations with time constants of the order of 50 ms. 4. After rupture of the patch of membrane, the pipette--cell seal remained stable ('whole-cell recording', Hamill et al. 1981). Chromaffin cells were found to have a resting potential of -50 to -80 mV, and an input resistance around 5 G omega. The high cell resistance accounts for the relaxing currents evident in the cell-attached configuration. 5. In the best cases, the effective time constant of the voltage clamp in the whole-cell recording mode was 15 microseconds. Exchange of small ions such as Na+ ions between pipette and cell interior solutions was then complete within 15 s. 6. Acetylcholine-induced currents were obtained at various acetylcholine concentrations. Single acetylcholine-induced channels had a slope conductance of 44 pS between -100 and -55 mV, and a mean duration of 27 ms at -80 mV (at room temperature).

Full text

PDF
577

Images in this article

580Fig. 1
on p.580

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biales B., Dichter M., Tischler A. Electrical excitability of cultured adrenal chromaffin cells. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):743–753. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brandt B. L., Hagiwara S., Kidokoro Y., Miyazaki S. Action potentials in the rat chromaffin cell and effects of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(3):417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):464–466. doi: 10.1038/294464a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Douglas W. W., Kanno T., Sampson S. R. Effects of acetylcholine and other medullary secretagogues and antagonists on the membrane potential of adrenal chromaffin cells: an analysis employing techniques of tissue culture. J Physiol. 1967 Jan;188(1):107–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fenwick E. M., Fajdiga P. B., Howe N. B., Livett B. G. Functional and morphological characterization of isolated bovine adrenal medullary cells. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jan;76(1):12–30. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fenwick E. M., Marty A., Neher E. Sodium and calcium channels in bovine chromaffin cells. J Physiol. 1982 Oct;331:599–635. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorman A. L., Mirolli M. The passive electrical properties of the membrane of a molluscan neurone. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):35–49. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ito S., Nakazato Y., Ohga A. The effect of veratridine on the release of catecholamines from the perfused adrenal gland. Br J Pharmacol. 1979 Feb;65(2):319–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb07833.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kidokoro Y., Ritchie A. K. Chromaffin cell action potentials and their possible role in adrenaline secretion from rat adrenal medulla. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:199–216. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirpekar S. M., Prat J. C. Release of catecholamines from perfused cat adrenal gland by veratridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):2081–2083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.2081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kostyuk P. G., Krishtal O. A., Shakhovalov Y. A. Separation of sodium and calcium currents in the somatic membrane of mollusc neurones. J Physiol. 1977 Sep;270(3):545–568. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krishtal O. A., Pidoplichko V. I. A receptor for protons in the nerve cell membrane. Neuroscience. 1980;5(12):2325–2327. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee K. S., Akaike N., Brown A. M. Properties of internally perfused, voltage-clamped, isolated nerve cell bodies. J Gen Physiol. 1978 May;71(5):489–507. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.5.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marty A. Ca-dependent K channels with large unitary conductance in chromaffin cell membranes. Nature. 1981 Jun 11;291(5815):497–500. doi: 10.1038/291497a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pallotta B. S., Magleby K. L., Barrett J. N. Single channel recordings of Ca2+-activated K+ currents in rat muscle cell culture. Nature. 1981 Oct 8;293(5832):471–474. doi: 10.1038/293471a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rang H. P. The characteristics of synaptic currents and responses to acetylcholine of rat submandibular ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:23–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schneider A. S., Herz R., Rosenheck K. Stimulus-secretion coupling in chromaffin cells isolated from bovine adrenal medulla. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):5036–5040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.5036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trifaró J. M., Lee R. W. Morphological characteristics and stimulus-secretion coupling in bovine adcrenal chromaffin cell cultures. Neuroscience. 1980;5(9):1533–1546. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson S. P., Kirshner N. The acetylcholine receptor of the adrenal medulla. J Neurochem. 1977 Apr;28(4):687–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES