Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982 Oct;331:637–652. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014395

Origin of the light peak: in vitro study of Gekko gekko

Edwin R Griff 1,2, Roy H Steinberg 1,2
PMCID: PMC1197772  PMID: 7153919

Abstract

1. The light peak is a large, light-evoked increase in standing potential recorded in mammals, birds and reptiles. We have studied the cellular origin of the light peak in an in vitro preparation of neural retina-pigment epithelium (r.p.e)—choroid from the lizard, Gekko gekko. The tissue was mounted between two separate bathing solutions; the trans-tissue potential was recorded retinal-side positive; micro-electrodes were introduced to measure the trans-epithelial potential (t.e.p.) and to record intracellularly from the r.p.e.

2. A 10 min stimulus of diffuse white light evoked an increase in trans-tissue potential that reached maximum amplitude, the light peak, about 15 min after stimulus onset. Since the light peak is present in vitro, it must originate in either the neural retina or the r.p.e.

3. A micro-electrode was positioned in the subretinal space and the trans-retinal potential and t.e.p. were measured simultaneously. A 10 min stimulus produced an increase in t.e.p. equal in magnitude and time course to the trans-tissue light peak; no potential was present across the retina. The light peak is therefore generated solely across the r.p.e.

4. Intracellular r.p.e. recordings were made to determine whether the light peak was generated at the apical or basal membrane or across the paracellular shunt. A 10 min stimulus first caused a hyperpolarization of both membranes with a time course similar to the r.p.e. c-wave followed by a depolarization of both membranes with the time course of the light peak. We conclude that whereas the r.p.e. c-wave results from a hyperpolarization of the apical membrane, the light peak is generated by a depolarization of the basal membrane of the r.p.e.

5. Changes in tissue resistance, Rt, and the ratio of apical to basal membrane resistances, a, were monitored during the light peak by passing current across the tissue and measuring the appropriate current-induced voltages. Rt decreased and a increased with the time course of the light peak. Assuming that the paracellular shunt resistance is constant, we conclude that the light peak is accompanied by an increase in basal membrane conductance.

6. This and the following paper present the first direct demonstration of an interaction between the neural retina and the basal membrane of the r.p.e. The light peak, initiated by absorption of light by photoreceptors, results in a depolarization and conductance increase of the basal membrane.

Full text

PDF
637

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARDEN G. B., KELSEY J. H. Changes produced by light in the standing potential of the human eye. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:189–204. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown K. T., Flaming D. G. Instrumentation and technique for beveling fine micropipette electrodes. Brain Res. 1975 Mar 14;86(1):172–180. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90652-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frömter E., Diamond J. Route of passive ion permeation in epithelia. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jan 5;235(53):9–13. doi: 10.1038/newbio235009a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GOURAS P., CARR R. E. LIGHT-INDUCED DC RESPONSES OF MONKEY RETINA BEFORE AND AFTER CENTRAL RETINAL ARTERY INTERRUPTION. Invest Ophthalmol. 1965 Jun;4:310–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hudspeth A. J., Yee A. G. The intercellular junctional complexes of retinal pigment epithelia. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973 May;12(5):354–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kikawada N. Variations in the corneo-retinal standing potential of the vertebrate eye during light and dark adaptations. Jpn J Physiol. 1968 Dec 15;18(6):687–702. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.18.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Linsenmeier R. A., Steinberg R. H. Origin and sensitivity of the light peak in the intact cat eye. J Physiol. 1982 Oct;331:653–673. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Madachi-Yamamoto S. [Abolition of the light rise by aspartate (author's transl)]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1980 Jul 10;84(7):607–616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martins-Ferreira H., de Oliveira Castro G. Spreading depression in isolated chick retina. Vision Res. 1971;Suppl 3:171–184. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90038-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller S. S., Steinberg R. H. Active transport of ions across frog retinal pigment epithelium. Exp Eye Res. 1977 Sep;25(3):235–248. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(77)90090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller S. S., Steinberg R. H. Passive ionic properties of frog retinal pigment epithelium. J Membr Biol. 1977 Sep 15;36(4):337–372. doi: 10.1007/BF01868158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oakley B., 2nd, Green D. G. Correlation of light-induced changes in retinal extracellular potassium concentration with c-wave of the electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Sep;39(5):1117–1133. doi: 10.1152/jn.1976.39.5.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oakley B., 2nd, Miller S. S., Steinberg R. H. Effect of intracellular potassium upon the electrogenic pump of frog retinal pigment epithelium. J Membr Biol. 1978 Dec 29;44(3-4):281–307. doi: 10.1007/BF01944225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oakley B., 2nd Potassium and the photoreceptor-dependent pigment epithelial hyperpolarization. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Oct;70(4):405–425. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.4.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oakley B., 2nd, Steinberg R. H., Miller S. S., Nilsson S. E. The in vitro frog pigment epithelial cell hyperpolarization in response to light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977 Aug;16(8):771–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodieck R. W. Components of the electroretinogram--a reappraisal. Vision Res. 1972 May;12(5):773–780. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Skoog K. O. The directly recorded standing potential of the human eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975 Mar;53(1):120–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steinberg R. H., Niemeyer G. Light peak of cat DC electroretinogram: not generated by a change in [K+]0. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Mar;20(3):415–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steinberg R. H., Oakley B., 2nd, Niemeyer G. Light-evoked changes in [K+]0 in retina of intact cat eye. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Nov;44(5):897–921. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.44.5.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Täumer R., Hennig J., Wolff L. Further investigations concerning the fast oscillation of the retinal potential. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1976;(85):57–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Täumer R., Rohde N., Pernice D. The slow oscillation of the retinal potential: a biochemical feedback stimulated by the activity of rods and cones. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1976;(85):40–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Valeton J. M., van Norren D. Intraretinal recordings of slow electrical responses to steady illumination in monkey: isolation of receptor responses and the origin of the light peak. Vision Res. 1982;22(3):393–399. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90155-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Harreveld A. Two mechanisms for spreading depression in the chicken retina. J Neurobiol. 1978 Nov;9(6):419–431. doi: 10.1002/neu.480090602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES