Skip to main content
BBA Advances logoLink to BBA Advances
. 2025 Mar 14;7:100156. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadva.2025.100156

Glycan-mediated adhesion mechanisms in antibiotic-resistant bacteria

Clara Dessenne a, Christophe Mariller a, Olivier Vidal a, Isabelle Huvent a, Yann Guerardel a,b, Elisabeth Elass-Rochard a, Yannick Rossez a,
PMCID: PMC11979486  PMID: 40207210

Highlights

  • WHO's 2024 list highlights urgent multidrug-resistant pathogens.

  • Host glycans facilitate bacterial adhesion and offer new therapeutic targets.

  • Bacterial adhesins that recognize glycan patches offer new research opportunities.

  • Bacterial adhesins targeting glycans in the environment need research.

Keywords: Adhesins, Glycans, Bacteria, Environment, Pathogens, Lectin

Abstract

Bacterial adhesins play a central role in host-pathogen interactions, with many specifically targeting glycans to mediate bacterial colonization, influence infection dynamics, and evade host immune responses. In this review, we focus on bacterial pathogens identified by the World Health Organization as critical threats to public health and in urgent need of new treatments. We summarize glycoconjugate targets identified in the literature across 19 bacterial genera and species. This comprehensive review provides a foundation for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies to effectively combat these pathogens.

Graphical abstract

Image, graphical abstract

List of acronyms

AIEC

Adherent Invasive E. coli

Ata

Trimeric Autotransporter Adhesin

BabA

Blood Group Antigen–Binding Adhesin

BFP

Bundle-Forming Pilus

CAZy

Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Database

CbpA

Choline Binding Protein A

ClfA/ClfB

Clumping Factors A and B

CS

Surface Antigens

CUP

Chaperone-Usher Pathway

DAEC

Diffuse Adherent E. coli

DLL

"Dock, Lock, and Latch"

EAEC

Enteroaggregative E. coli

EcbA

E. faecium Collagen Binding Protein A

ECM

Extracellular Matrix

ECP

E. coli Common Pilus

EHEC

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli

EIEC

Enteroinvasive E. coli

EPEC

Enteropathogenic E. coli

ESKAPE

Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.

ETEC

Enterotoxigenic E. coli

ExPEC

Extraintestinal Pathogenic E. coli

FHA

Filamentous Hemagglutinin

Fuc

Fucose

Gal

Galactose

GalCer

Galactosylceramide

GalNAc

N-acetylgalactosamine

GA1

Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–4Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide

GA2

GalNAcβ1–4Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide

Gb3

Globotriaosylceramide

Gb4

Globoside

GBS

Group B Streptococcus / Guillain-Barré Syndrome (context-dependent)

GH

Glycosyl Hydrolases

Glc

Glucose

GlcN

Glucosamine

GlcNAc

N-acetylglucosamine

GP2

Glycoprotein 2

GAG

Glycosaminoglycan

GAS

Group A Streptococcus

HA

Hyaluronic Acid

HBHA

Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin

HIF

H. influenzae Fimbriae

Hof

Helicobacter Outer Membrane

Hom

Helicobacter Outer Membrane

Hop

Helicobacter Outer Membrane Proteins

Hor

Hop-Related

Kdn

2-Keto-3-deoxy-D‑glycero-d-galacto-nononic acid

KpSC

Klebsiella pneumoniae Species Complex

LabA

LacdiNAc-Binding Adhesin

LacNAc

N-acetyllactosamine

LPxTG

Leucine-Proline-X-Threonine/Serine/Alanine-Glycine Motif

LOS

Lipooligosaccharides

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

Man

Mannose

Man3GlcNAc2

Oligomannose-3

Man5GlcNAc2

Oligomannose-5

Man6GlcNAc2

Oligomannose-6

MAM

Multivalent Adhesion Molecule

mAG

Mycolylarabinogalactan

MR/P

Man-Resistant Proteus-Like Fimbriae

MSCRAMM

Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules

MSHA

Mannose-Sensitive Hemagglutinin

MucBP

Mucin-Binding Protein

NAF

Non-Agglutinating Fimbria

Neu5Ac

N-acetylneuraminic Acid

Neu5Gc

N-glycolylneuraminic Acid

NHBA

Neisserial Heparin Binding Antigen

NhhA

Neisseria hsf Homologue

NTHi

Non-Typeable Haemophilus influenzae

nsSNPs

Nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

Omp

Outer Membrane Protein

OMPs

Outer Membrane Proteins

Opa

Opacity-Associated Protein

Pef

Plasmid-Encoded Fimbriae

PGC-3

Pilin Gene Cluster 3

Pls

Plasmin-Sensitive Protein

SabA

Sialic Acid-Binding Adhesin

Sdc1

Cell Surface Syndecan 1

sLea

Sialyl-Lewisᵃ

sLex

Sialyl-Lewisˣ

SLN-Ac (2–3)

Neu5Acα2–3Galβ1–4GlcN

SLN-Ac (2–6)

Neu5Acα2–6Galβ1–4GlcNAc

SPR

Surface Plasmon Resonance

SRR

Serine-Rich Repeat

SRRP

Serine-Rich Repeat Glycoprotein

STEC

Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli

T3SS

Type III Secretion System

T4bP

Type IVb Pilus

TAA

Trimeric Autotransporter Adhesin

TB

Tuberculosis

Uca

Urothelial Cell Adhesin

UPEC

Uropathogenic E. coli

UTI

Urinary Tract Infections

vWF

von Willebrand Factor

WHO

World Health Organization

Introduction

The ESKAPE pathogens were initially identified as a group of multidrug-resistant bacteria that present an urgent need for effective therapies. This group, collectively known as the "ESKAPE bugs," includes Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species [1]. With taxonomic revisions and the emergence of new threats, such as resistant Escherichia coli strains infections in immunocompromised individuals, there is growing recognition that the ESKAPE acronym may need to be updated to reflect these evolving challenges [2]. In addition to the ESKAPE pathogens, the 2024 World Health Organization (WHO) list highlights several other antibiotic-resistant bacteria that demand urgent attention. More pathogens were selected based on lethality, length of hospital stay, antibiotic resistance, ease of transmission, prevention options, available treatments, and whether new antibiotics are in development [3]. At the top of the priority list is multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, reflecting its critical public health impact. The WHO also designates Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriales with carbapenem resistance and third-generation cephalosporin resistance as critical priorities for research and development. In the high-priority category, the list includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella species, Salmonella species (both Typhi and non-typhoidal), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The medium-priority group comprises Group A and Group B Streptococci, which exhibit resistance to macrolides and penicillin, respectively, along with Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. These classifications highlight the urgent need for targeted efforts to develop new antibiotics and treatment strategies to address each of these resistant pathogens. Notably, Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter species, which were included in the 2017 WHO list, are no longer part of the 2024 update. However, their relevance to antibiotic resistance remains significant and they will be included in this review.

Glycans are critical determinants that regulate the attachment of pathogens to the surface of host cells. In vertebrates, glycans are covalently linked to proteins and lipids, resulting in a diverse array of glycoproteins and glycolipids that are essential for host-bacterial interactions. Common monosaccharides involved in vertebrate glycosylation include mannose (Man), fucose (Fuc), glucose (Glc), galactose (Gal), N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), glucosamine (GlcN), N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) and sialic acid (Neu5Ac, Neu5Gc, Kdn for the most common). Mucins, which can be up to 80 % carbohydrate by molecular weight, are mostly O-glycosylated and are characterized by a core region, an elongated backbone, and a peripheral domain with various antigenic structures [4]. In addition, proteoglycans consist of a protein core linked to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and play an essential role in pathogen adhesion and invasion [5]. Extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoproteins such as fibronectin, laminin, and collagen are also highly glycosylated, maintaining tissue integrity and facilitating cellular interactions. In addition, glycolipids contribute to this complexity by serving as receptors for pathogens, facilitating their attachment to host cells, and modulating immune responses [6]. Bacterial adhesion to host cells, often mediated by lectins (carbohydrate-binding proteins that recognize specific sugar structures on host surfaces) is a critical step in the infection process, facilitating colonization and increasing resistance to immune responses and antibiotics. Targeting this initial adhesion with anti-adhesion therapies represents a promising strategy to prevent infection [7,8]. Therefore, insight into the role of glycosylation in bacterial adhesion may reveal new therapeutic targets and improve strategies to disrupt the early stages of infection. This review will focus on bacterial adhesins identified in the WHO's priority pathogen list, with emphasis on their interactions with host glycans. Adhesins include fibrillar structures (also called fimbriae or pili) [9], surface-exposed proteins, secreted proteins, and glycolipids (Fig. 1). We will review the currently described molecular mechanisms of these adhesin-glycan interactions, which may point to future developments of effective therapeutic interventions.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1:

Schematic representation of the main molecules involved in glycan-mediated adhesion phenomena between antibiotic-resistant bacteria and eukaryotic cells. The complementary abbreviations represent: Omp: outer membrane protein, LPS: lipopolysaccharide: TAA: trimeric autotranporter, LPxTG: enterococcal surface protein linked by a leucine-proline-X-threonine/serine/alanine-glycine motif, MSCRAMM: microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, mAG: mycolylarabinogalactan, HBHA: heparin-binding hemagglutinin, GAG: glycosaminoglycan, HA: hyaluronic acid.

Critical priority list

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Mycobacteria cause various diseases, including tuberculosis (TB), leprosy, and opportunistic infections. They interact with host immune cells, particularly macrophages, to proliferate and spread [10]. While numerous mycobacterial adhesins have been identified [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]], limited information exists on lectin adhesins, their carbohydrate ligands, and functions [[17], [18], [19]] (Table 1). However, binding assays of M. tuberculosis (M. tub) on sugar-coated plates strongly suggested the presence of lectins on cell surfaces [19] and recent studies suggest mycobacterial lectins as potential drug targets and vaccine candidates for TB [20]. Genomic analyses have identified at least 94 potential lectins across mycobacteria, but only 11 in M. tub [17,18]. These include Ricin-type lectins, Man-specific C-type lectins, Man-sensitive hemagglutin, heparin-binding hemagglutinins, and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA). Most of these remain structurally uncharacterized.

Table 1.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by mycobacterial species along with the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Yeast mannan [31]
D-arabinose and mycobacterial arabinogalactan [31]
Heparan sulfate proteoglycans, including Syndecan-4 (disaccharide repeat consisting of GlcNAc and glucuronic acid with sulfate on hydroxyl groups) [[21], [22], [23],29]
Sulfated glycoconjugates [24,39,40]
Galβ1–4GlcNAc in N-glycans [34]
Sulfated Gal [43,44]
GalNAc [43,44]
Hyaluronic acid (disaccharide repeat consisting of GlcNAc and glucuronic acid) [30]
Dermatan sulfate (disaccharide repeat consisting of GalNAc and iduronic acid with sulfate on hydroxyl groups) [43,44]
Sialylated glycans [43]

Mycobacterium tuberculosis lectin adhesins

Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin (HBHA), a 22-kDa protein encoded by rv0475, is the most studied mycobacterial adhesin, essential for adherence to lung epithelial cells via heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which contain repeating disaccharide units of GlcNAc and glucuronic acid residues [[21], [22], [23]]. Its C-terminal lysine-rich domain binds sulfated glycoconjugates, promoting extrapulmonary dissemination [24]. Antibodies against HBHA reduce mycobacterial adhesion to epithelial cells. HBHA is present in multiple mycobacteria, including M. leprae and M. marinum [18]. It is also a proposed TB biomarker [25]. Additional functions include apoptosis induction in macrophages [26], actin reorganization [27], and lipid inclusion formation [28]. HBHA also interacts with syndecan-4 on alveolar epithelial cells [29]. Syndecans are a family of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. They are involved in cell adhesion, intercellular signaling, and tissue morphogenesis. The M. tub protein Rv3194c, primarily described as a protease, also binds hyaluronic acid (HA) found on pneumocytes [30]. The HA-binding site lies between amino acid residues 91–100 of Rv3194c. Overexpression of Rv3194c in M. smegmatis enhances persistent lung infections in mice [30]. Another 12–14 kDa lectin named "mycotin" was isolated from M. smegmatis [31], and similar hemagglutinating proteins were identified in M. tub and M. bovis [32]. Their hemagglutination was inhibited by yeast polymannosylated N-glycoproteins (mannan), d-arabinose, and mycobacterial arabinogalactan [31], while mannan also blocked adhesion to macrophages [32]. Interestingly, d-arabinose was shown to disperse mycobacterial clumps [33]. The secreted M. tub protein sMTL-13, encoded by rv1419, is a ricin-type β-trefoil lectin [34]. It is found in M. bovis BCG, M. marinum, and M. ulcerans. sMTL-13 is detected in M. tub culture filtrates but not in non-tuberculous mycobacteria [34]. Patients with active TB show high levels of anti-sMTL-13 IgG and secrete IFN-γ [34]. sMTL-13 induces IL-6 production, contributing to TB resistance [35]. It was predicted as a drug target [36], and a DNA vaccine has shown strong immune responses in mice [37]. The protein modulates macrophage adhesion, and its recombinant form was crystallized [38], but the 3D structure remains unresolved. Its β-trefoil structure belongs to the ricin β family, which recognizes [Galβ1–4GlcNAc] patterns in host N-glycans. Additionally, four M. tub proteins (Rv0355, Rv1917, Rv3343, Rv3350) with sequence similarity to FHA, a 220 kDa protein in Bordetella pertussis that binds sulfated glycolipids and promotes biofilm formation were identified in M. tub [39,40]. While these proteins remain uncharacterized, molecular docking with fucoidan derivatives suggests potential applications for TB treatment [20].

Lectin adhesins in other mycobacterial species

Beyond M. tub, several potential lectins have been identified in other mycobacterial species. MUL_3720 from M. ulcerans is composed of a lectin domain initially recognized as binding Man and of a C-terminal LysM domain that binds peptidoglycan [41,42]. The first domain was later shown to bind sulfated Gal and GalNAc present in GAG like dermatan sulfate (disaccharide repeat consisting of GalNAc and iduronic acid) and keratin [43,44]. Orthologs have been identified in M. marinum (MMAR_3773) but are not documented in M. tub [42]. M. ulcerans cells interact with diverse glycans, including sialylated glycans, although in a MUL_3720-independent manner [43]. A sequence-database search for β-prism fold lectin domains identified MSMEG_3662, a 208-residue protein in Mycobacterium smegmatis [45]. This protein shares similarities with monocot Man-binding β-prism II fold lectins. Orthologs were identified in M. abscessus but not in M. tub. Based on crystallization and X-ray from M. smegmatis [45,46], the Man-binding domain was located in the N-terminal region, within the carbohydrate-binding module 50 (CBM50, also known as LysM domains) (http://www.cazy.org). In contrast, the C-terminal domain was shown to be responsible for binding to peptidoglycan. However, its role in host interaction remains unclear. M. tub Rv2075 shows sequence and secondary structure similarities with human Man receptor 2 and C. elegans proteins [17,18]. Orthologs of Rv2075c have been identified in multiple M. tub strains [18]. This lectin is predicted to be located in the outer membrane [47]. rv2813 and rv3659 genes encode Man-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA)-like proteins, with Rv2813 sharing similarities with Vibrio cholerae MSHA D, essential for erythrocyte agglutination [48]. Recent studies have also shown that M. ulcerans exhibits high affinity for sulfated glycans and keratin [43,44]. Furthermore, the discovery of mycobacterial pili [[49], [50], [51]] opens new avenues to explore lectins within these structures.

Acinetobacter baumannii

A. baumannii is an emerging opportunistic pathogen responsible for infections in multiple body sites, including the lungs, bloodstream, skin, urinary tract, and soft tissues [52]. Despite its clinical significance, limited data are available on A. baumannii adhesins (Table 2). Among its characterized virulence factors is the trimeric autotransporter adhesin (Ata), which plays a critical role in the bacterium's ability to adhere to host cells and tissues. This adhesin has been shown to interact with components of the extracellular matrix of the host cell via specific glycans, including Gal, GlcNAc, and Gal(β1–3/4)-GlcNAc [53]. Furthermore, the adhesion onto respiratory tract epithelial cells of CsuA/BABCDE pilus of A. baumannii, another adhesin, is inhibited by Man [54]. Adding to these adhesins, the A. baumannii pili Abp1 and Abp2 are part of the chaperone-usher pathway (CUP) and are equipped with the adhesins Abp1D and Abp2D, which specifically bind to biantennary N-glycans. This biantennary glycan consists of two GlcNAc residues attached to a central trimannose moiety, with each branch containing a terminal GlcNAc and Gal [55]. In addition, A. baumannii possesses yet unidentified adhesins on its surface that can bind to various glycosphingolipids, including lactotetraosylceramide (Lc4Cer) (Galβ1–3GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) and neolactotetraosylceramide (nLc4Cer) (Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) via GlcNAc [56]. Conversely, the AbFhaB/FhaC two-partner secretion system has been identified to bind extracellular matrix glycoproteins such as fibronectin, although details of the glycan component of this interaction remain unknown [57].

Table 2.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Acinetobacter baumannii and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Gal(β1–3/4)-GlcNAc [53]
D-man [54]
Biantennary N-glycans with a trimannose backbone [55]
Lc4Cer [56]
nLc4Cer [56]

Enterobacterales

E. coli

Typically, E. coli is a commensal bacterium in the gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates, but certain strains express virulence factors allowing them to become pathogenic in humans and animals. These pathogenic strains cause a range of infections, from intestinal diseases such as diarrhea to extraintestinal infections such as urinary tract infections, sepsis, and meningitis. The major pathotypes include enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) including the shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), diffuse adherent E. coli (DAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC), and extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), which includes uropathogenic (UPEC), meningitic, and bloodborne strains [58].

Numerous pili, commonly known as fimbriae, have been extensively studied for their molecular recognition properties in E. coli (Table 3). These structures typically possess a lectin domain at the tip of their filamentous appendages. The type 1 pilus, in particular, has received considerable attention due to the presence of the FimH protein at its tip, which is critical for the virulence UPEC, the major cause of urinary tract infections (UTI) [59]. In addition, type 1 pilus of both Salmonella and E. coli have been shown to facilitate pathogenesis by mediating adhesion to and promoting internalization on a variety of host cells, including epithelial, endothelial, and lymphoid cells [60]. FimH contains a lectin domain that exhibits a specific binding affinity for Man. Its primary natural receptor is the uroplakin glycoprotein, which is highly expressed on the epithelial cells of the urinary tract [[61], [62], [63], [64]]. In addition, glycoprotein 2 (GP2), which is specifically expressed on the apical plasma membrane of M cells within the intestinal epithelium, is also recognized by the type 1 pilus and functions as a transcytotic receptor for mucosal antigens [65]. FimH targets oligomannosylated N-glycans, with oligomannose-3 (Man3GlcNAc2) and oligomannose-5 (Man5GlcNAc2) showing the strongest binding through their Manα1,3Man branch. The addition of an α1–2 linked Man to form oligomannose-6 (Man6GlcNAc2) shields this high-affinity site, facilitating cooperative bivalent binding of multiple FimH molecules, which further enhances the interaction [66]. In combination with this specificity, FimH uses catch bonds to enhance its binding capacity. Catch bonds are specialized receptor-ligand interactions that strengthen under mechanical force and have longer lifetimes, in contrast to typical slip bonds that weaken under increasing tension. FimH undergoes a force-induced conformational shift from an open to a closed state, increasing the stability of the binding. The closed binding pocket in FimH restricts ligand escape, making it highly resistant to dissociation under force and contributing to the longevity of the binding [67].

Table 3.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Escherichia coli and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Man [59,60,[65], [66], [67]]
Gb3 [58,68,69]
Gb4 [68,69]
LacNAc [70,71,73,74,[91], [92], [93]]
GalCer [[72], [73], [74]]
GA2 [[72], [73], [74]]
GA1 [[72], [73], [74]]
Sialic acid [[75], [76], [77],86,87]
GlcNAc [78]
Lactotriaosylceramide [80]
Lactotetraosylceramide [80]
Blood group H and B [83]
Sialyl-lacto-N-fucopentose VI [84]
Sulfatide [81,82,85]
β-GalNAc-1,4β-Gal [74,88]
Glucosylceramide [90]
Lactosylceramide [73,74,90]
Lea, Lex, Ley [90]
Neolactotetraosylceramide [90]
Gangliotriaosylceramide [90]
Gangliotetraosylceramide [90]
3-O-sulfated galactose [96]
GalNAc [98,99]

During ascending UTIs, UPEC utilize P-pili to attach to glycolipid receptors on the surface of renal epithelial cells, with the adhesin PapG, located at the tip of the P-pilus, playing a crucial role in this binding. The receptor for PapG is globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), which consists of a digalactoside core (Galα1–4 Gal) linked by a β-Glc residue to a ceramide group; variations in this receptor family, such as the addition of GalNAc to form Gb4 (globoside), can also be recognized by PapG. This interaction is essential for bacterial colonization of the kidneys and is a key factor in developing pyelonephritis, a severe kidney infection [68,69].

The adhesin FmlH, located at the tip of the F9 pilus facilitates adhesion to terminal Gal linked in β1–3 to GlcNAc, forming the Galβ1–3GlcNAc sequence, also known as type 1 GalNAc. This terminal LacNAc type 1 is present in core-1 and −2 O-glycans of inflamed urothelium and is linked to the persistence of UPEC during chronic cystitis in an acute mouse model [70,71].

ETEC strains isolated from pigs with post-weaning diarrhea produce different pili than ETEC strains that infect humans, including pili K88 and F18. In addition, ETEC strains causing neonatal diarrhea in piglets are typically associated with pili K99, F6 (also known as porcine antigen 987), and F41 (without known glycoreceptors so far), which show little correlation with post-weaning diarrhea [72]. The K88 pilus also known as F4 binds to GalCer (Gal-ceramide) with hydroxylated fatty acids, GA2 (GalNAcβ1–4Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide), GA1 (Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–4Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide), and lactosylceramide (Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) via galactosyl residues in glycosphingolipids [73,74]. K99 pilus, also called F5, was shown to bind to sialic acid [75] from gangliosides [76] and porcin mucins [77]. F17 G fimbriae promote binding to GlcNAc-containing receptors on the microvilli of the intestinal epithelium of ruminants [78]. Five F17 G variants exhibit different binding specificities, with F17aG having the highest affinity for HOOC(CH3)CH3–3-O-GlcNAcβ1–4GlcNAcβ, mainly due to its higher positive charge from additional lysines and arginines compared to F17bG. While F17aG also binds well to doubly sulfated Galβ1–4GlcNAc, F17bG affinity for this sugar is significantly lower, possibly due to the mutation of Asn90 to Lys90 in F17aG, which affects the interactions with sulfate ion. In addition, F17bG binds disialylated lactose [79].

F6 binds to the glycosphingolipids lactotriaosylceramide (GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) and lactotetraosylceramide (Galβ1–3GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) via a neolacto core chain (Galβ1–4GlcNAc) [80]. A class of pili related to F6, termed colonization factors or coli surface antigens (CS), has been identified in human-associated ETEC. They include CS12, CS18, CS20, and CS30. CS30 is found in ETEC isolates from children with diarrhea worldwide, underscoring their clinical significance. The operon structure of CS30 is highly conserved and closely resembles the operon architecture of F6, suggesting a common evolutionary origin and functional similarities across host species. The major subunit of CS30, CsmA, shares over 50 % amino acid identity with the major subunit of F6, FasA. In addition, the CS30-binding glycosphingolipid from human small intestine was identified as sulfatide (SO3–3Gal-ceramide) [81,82].

F18 pili encoded by the fed gene cluster found in ETEC and STEC are known to bind via the adhesin FedF to glycosphingolipids having blood group H type 1 determinant (Fucα1–2Galβ1–3GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc). Notably, the affinity increases when a terminal α3-linked Gal or GalNAc is added, forming the blood group B (Galα1–3(Fucα1–2)Galβ1–3GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc) or A (GalNAcα1–3(Fucα1–2)Galβ1–3GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc) determinants respectively on small intestinal epithelium [83].

Ucl pilus (also previously annotated as F17-like or Uca-like pilus) are key attachment factors that promote adherence of ExPEC. Among 358 glycans tested, Ucl pili were found to bind to four specific glycans, three of which were sialylated and three α1–3 fucosylated. The highest binding affinity was observed for sialyllacto-N-fucopentose VI, highlighting its role as a critical receptor for these pili (Neu5Acα2–6Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4(Fucα1–3)Glc) [84].

CS6 pili from ETEC bind specifically to sulfatide (SO3–3Gal-ceramide) on glycosphingolipids. This binding is mediated by the CssB subunit of the CS6 complex and is inhibited by dextran sulfate. Sulfatides are found located in the human or rabbit small intestine [85].

S-type fimbriae (Sfa) from ExPEC bind specifically to NeuAcα2–3-Gal on glycolipids and glycoproteins through the SfaS adhesin [86,87]. Similarly, F1C pili from UPEC can adhere to βGalNAc1–4βGal found on asialo-GM2 and asialoGM1 present in epithelial cells [74,88]. Like P and S pili, F1C pili have evolved to withstand the specific conditions of the upper urinary tract [89].

Colonization factor antigen (CFA/I) from ETEC is a pilus without distinct tip structure binding to many different glycosphingolipids: glucosylceramide (Glc-ceramide), lactosylceramide (Galα3Galβ4Glc-ceramide and Galα3Galα3Galβ4Glc-ceramide) with lewisa epitope (Galβ1–3(Fucα1–4)GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide), neolactotetraosylceramide (Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide, Galα1–3Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) with blood group H (Fucα1–2Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide), lewisx (Galβ4(Fucα3)GlcNAcβ3Galβ4Glc-ceramide) and lewisy (Fucα1–2Galβ1–4(Fucα1–3)GlcNAcβ1–3Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide), gangliotriaosylceramide (GalNAcβ1–4Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) and gangliotetraosylceramide (Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–4Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide) [90].

The bundle-forming pilus (BFP), also known as the type IVb pilus (T4bP) of EPEC, is essential for initial host cell attachment. Its major structural component acts as a lectin, allowing EPEC to bind specifically to N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) glycan receptors on host cell surfaces. Incubation of EPEC with synthetic LacNAc-bearing neoglycoconjugates not only blocks this adhesion, but also promotes BFP retraction, leading to subsequent degradation of T4bP subunits [[91], [92], [93]].

Of the 58 pili identified in E. coli, the molecular receptors for many of these adhesins remain to be elucidated. However, a significant number of studies have shown that the intestinal mucosa serves as a receptor for several types of pili [94]. Furthermore, EPEC and EHEC O157 adherence to HT-29 cells decreases with cell differentiation and following disruption of O-glycan biosynthesis. The absence of core 2 O-glycans further reduces the adhesion of these pathogens, highlighting the need to identify additional adhesins involved in this process [95]. Other than pili, the multivalent adhesion molecule (MAM) of the intestinal commensal E. coli recognize a common 3-O-sulfogalactosyl moiety found in mucin. Desulfation of mucin reduced bacterial binding and increased attachment to epithelial surfaces through interactions with sulfated lipids and proteins [96].

EtpA, an exoprotein adhesin secreted via the two-partner system in ETEC, binds to the conserved region of flagellin by attaching to the uncapped tips of the flagellum. This interaction forms a "bridge" that facilitates the indirect adhesion of flagella to intestinal mucosal tissues [97]. Once at the host epithelium, EtpA binds directly to GalNAc as the terminal monosaccharide of the human A blood group on enterocyte surfaces and secreted mucins such as MUC2 [98]. People with blood group A thus appear to be more likely to develop moderate to severe diarrhea when infected with the EtpA-producing ETEC [99].

Proteus spp

The genus Proteus is classified in the newly established family Morganellaceae, part of the order Enterobacteriales [100]. Proteus comprises six species, including P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, and P. penneri, which are typically considered opportunistic pathogens with relatively low virulence. Among these, P. mirabilis can cause a variety of human infections involving wounds, the eyes, the gastrointestinal tract, and the urinary tract [101]. Sequencing of the clinical isolate P. mirabilis HI4320 allowed to predict 17 chaperone fimbrial operons, with a high degree of conservation in the major structural subunit proteins for 14 of these pili among 58 clinical isolates [102]. However, to date, only a small number of pili encoded by P. mirabilis (Table 4) have been characterized among which Man-resistant Proteus-like (MR/P) and urothelial cell adhesin (Uca) (or non-agglutinating fimbria, NAF). The MR/P pilus features MrpH as its tip-located adhesin, which may interact with acidic protein side chains or sialoglycans. It contains a transition metal center, where Zn²⁺ is coordinated by three conserved histidine residues, alongside a ligand-binding site [84,103]. While the tip-adhesin from Uca, UcaD binds to TF antigen-β1–3 Gal (Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–3 Gal), 6-O-sulfated-sialyl-lewisx (Neu5Acα2–3(6-O-Sul)Galβ1–4(Fucα1–3)GlcNAcβ), biantennary lactosamine-Tn-antigens (Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–6(Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1–3)GalNAcα) and GT3 glycan moiety (Neu5Acα2–8Neu5Acα2–8Neu5Acα2–3Galβ1–4Glc) with high affinity [84]. Uca pili are phylogenetically related to Ucl pilus from E. coli and F17/G pilus from ETEC. However, none of the key residues observed in the F17/G or Ucl binding pockets are conserved in the tip-adhesin UcaD, suggesting differences in ligand recognition despite their evolutionary relationship [104].

Table 4.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Proteus spp. and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Sialoglycans, GT3 [84,103]
TF antigen-β1–3Gal [84]
6-O-sulfated-sialyl-Lewisx [84]
Biantennary lactosamine-Tn-antigens [84]

Klebsiella spp

Klebsiella spp. are opportunistic pathogens that can cause a variety of infections, including pneumonia, soft tissue and surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, and sepsis. The genus includes a wide range of species, most notably the Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex (KpSC) and several more genetically distinct species such as K. indica, K. terrigena, K. spallanzanii, K. huaxiensis, K. oxytoca, K. grimontii, K. pasteurii, and K. michiganensis. The KpSC, includes species that are closely related to K. pneumoniae sensu stricto and share an average nucleotide identity of 95–96 %. Seven KpSC phylogroups were identified, including K. pneumoniae (Kp1), K. quasipneumoniae subsp. quasipneumoniae (Kp2), K. variicola subsp. variicola (Kp3), K. quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae (Kp4), K. variicola subsp. tropica (Kp5), K. quasivariicola (Kp6), and K. africana (Kp7) [105].

Similar to UPEC, K. pneumoniae relies on FimH-tipped type 1 pili to adhere to and invade bladder epithelial cells. K. pneumoniae FimH is predominantly in a low-affinity state. However, isolates from patients with long-term indwelling catheters were shown to possess relaxed, high-affinity FimH variants. These variants enhance K. pneumoniae fitness in bladder infection models, suggesting that prolonged residence in the urinary tract may be selected for these higher-binding FimH variants [106]. Type 3 pili are found primarily in Klebsiella spp. (detected in 95 % of K. pneumoniae isolates), as well as in Enterobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia, and Citrobacter species. However, they occur in only about 2 % of E. coli isolates. These fimbriae belong to the chaperone/usher family encoded by the mrkABCDF gene cluster, where mrkA encodes the major structural subunit and mrkD encodes the fimbrial adhesin [107]. MrkD binds to collagen types IV and V [108]. Type 1 pili mediate Man dependent agglutination of yeast, whereas type 3 pili mediate Man-resistant agglutination [109]. Although the exact structure of the glycan target remains unclear, type 3 pili contain two domains similar to those of type 1 pili that allow catch-bond-like binding [107]. K. aerogenes uses the CUP1-mediated chaperone-usher (CU) pili system to bind and colonize the inflamed intestinal mucosa, but not the oral mucosa, although the exact molecular target is not known [110] (Table 5).

Table 5.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Klebsiella spp. and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Mannose-containing glycans [109]
Unknown glycan target in the inflamed intestinal mucosa [110]

Enterobacter spp.

The genus Enterobacter currently contains 22 identified species, of which E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, and E. hormaechei are the most isolated in clinical infections. These species are often associated with infections in immunocompromised patients and those in intensive care units. Enterobacter spp. have been implicated in a variety of infections, including cerebral abscess, pneumonia, meningitis, septicemia, and infections of the urinary tract (especially catheter-associated), wounds, and abdominal or intestinal tract [111]. In E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii, the mrkABCDF locus encoding type 3 pilus is commonly found on plasmids. Although type 3 fimbriae are not widely distributed across the species, they may confer a fitness advantage to certain E. hormaechei strains A 35 kDa pilus subunit in E. cloacae, showing over 85 % identity to FimH in S. Typhimurium, functions as a lectin that specifically recognizes and binds to high-mannose structures, particularly Man9GlcNAc2 [112]. Notably, around 50 % of Enterobacter spp. isolates from a hospital in Egypt were found to carry the fimH gene [113]. Despite these findings, the literature on adhesins in Enterobacter spp. remains scarce. (Table 6).

Table 6.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Enterobacter cloacae and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Man9GlcNAc2 [112]

Other Enterobacteriales

Other Enterobacteriales, such as Serratia spp., Citrobacter spp., Morganella spp., Raoultella spp., Providencia spp., Pantoea spp., Yersinia spp., Cronobacter spp., Kluyvera spp., Budvicia spp., Buttiauxella spp., Edwardsiella spp., Hafnia spp., and Cedecea spp., are increasingly concerning due to their ability to develop antibiotic resistance [114]. They represent a critical area for future research, as many of them are still poorly characterized in terms of their ability to bind glycoproteins.

High priority list

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is associated with increasing infections, primarily in healthcare settings. These infections are prevalent in immunocompromised individuals, including burn victims, patients with cystic fibrosis, acute leukemia, organ transplant recipients, and intravenous drug users [115]. The interaction between P. aeruginosa and glycans has been characterized for many types of glycans among which N-glycans have been identified as ligands for adhesion to epithelial cells and macrophages [116,117]. P. aeruginosa can also bind complex glycans in glycolipids [118], GAGs [116], chitin (disaccharide on GlcNAc linked in β1–4) [119], and mucin glycans [120]. Interestingly, the latter have also been described to attenuate P. aeruginosa virulence by downregulating the type VI secretion system [121,122] (Table 7).

Table 7.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
N-glycans [116,117]
Complex glycans in glycolipids [118]
Glycosaminoglycans [116]
Chitin (disaccharide on GlcNAc linked in β1–4) [119]
Mucin glycans [121,122]
GM1 [123,125]
GD1a [123,125]
Heparan sulfate (disaccharide repeat consisting of GlcNAc and glucuronic acid with sulfate on hydroxyl groups) [128]
Lex and sialyl-lex [126,127]
GalNAcβ1–4 Gal (present in asialo-GM1 and asialo GM2) [128]
Type 1: Galβ1–3GlcNAc and Type 2: Galβ1–4GlcNAc [129,130]
Fuc [131]
Gal [131]
Gb3, iGb3 [132,133]

P. aeruginosa flagellum plays a crucial role in pulmonary infection by binding to specific glycolipids containing α2,3-linked Neu5Ac residues on lung epithelial cells. It binds to the terminal sialic acid of GM1 (NeuAcα2–3Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–4(Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide)) and GD1a (NeuAc-α2–3Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–4(Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide)) on the apical surface. It also binds asialo-GM1 (Galβ1–3GalNAcβ1–4(Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide)) but with a lower affinity [[123], [124], [125]]. Additionally, flagella interact with heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the basolateral surface and to Lewisx and sialyl-lex through the cap of the Flagella; FliD on the strain PAO1. The Type IV pilus (T4P) further facilitates infection by binding to N-glycans on the apical surface of polarized lung epithelial cells [126,127]. The same pilus has been identified to recognize GalNAcβ1–4 Gal disaccharide, present in asialo-GM1 and asialo-GM2 (GalNAcβ1–4(Galβ1–4Glc-ceramide)) [128].

Whole bacterial cells have been reported to bind to type 1 (Galβ1–3GlcNAc) and type 2 (Galβ1–4GlcNAc) glycan epitopes as well as to GalNAcβ1–4 Gal; however, the specific adhesins responsible for this recognition have not been investigated [129,130].

P. aeruginosa produces two cytoplasmic lectins, LecA (PA-IL) and LecB (PA-IIL), which bind specifically to d-Gal and l-Fuc, respectively [131]. During infection, bacterial cell lysis releases tetrameric LecA, which bridges the bacterial envelope to Gal disaccharides present on tissue glycolipids, including globotriaosylceramide (Gb3, Galα1–4Galβ1–4Glc) and isoglobotriaosylceramide (iGb3, Galα1–3Galβ1–4Glc) [132]. This interaction triggers membrane engulfment of the bacterium through a "lipid zipper" mechanism, facilitating its internalization into host cells [133].

Enterococcus faecium

Enterococcus faecium is a commensal organism in the intestinal microbiota of humans and animals that has evolved over the past four decades into a feared multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen responsible for infectious endocarditis, urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections, meningitis, surgical site infections, and septicemia [134]. E. faecium expresses several adhesins that interact with host glycoproteins, particularly components of the ECM, although the specific role of glycans in these interactions remains unclear.

E. faecium and other Gram-positive cocci, like Staphylococcus aureus produces a variety of surface proteins that are covalently linked to the cell wall peptidoglycan through a leucine-proline-X-threonine/serine/alanine-glycine (LPxTG) motif and play a critical role in host colonization and infection progression. These cell wall-anchored proteins are typically categorized according to their structural and functional properties. Among the most common types are microbial surface component-recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, a family of proteins characterized by the presence of two adjacent IgG-like folded subdomains that are involved in ligand binding [135]. In E. faecium, 15 predicted microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM) proteins were identified predominantly in clinically derived isolates [136].

Among them, Acm (adhesin of collagen from E. faecium) that interacts with collagen type I and to a lesser extent with collagen type IV [137,138], Scm (for second collagen adhesin of E. faecium) binds to collagen type V and fibrinogen like EcbA (for E. faecium collagen binding protein A) [139]. However, due to the limited repertoire of surface proteins, individual bacterial proteins have undergone selective pressure to evolve multifunctionality, allowing them to play different roles in colonizing host tissues by having multiple ligands and evading the immune system [135].

Interestingly, the comparison of pilin gene cluster 3 (PGC-3) of E. faecium E1165 and the SpaCBA pili of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, a human gut-adapted and health-benefiting probiotic strain, revealed a high level of sequence similarity between the two pilus gene clusters. Pilus-mediated interaction between E. faecium and host mucus could be inhibited by targeting these structures through competitive binding of the L. rhamnosus GG SpaC protein [140]. The SpaC protein can recognize Man and may bind to longer intestinal mucin oligosaccharides. It also appears capable of forming a Fuc binding site similar to that found in F-type lectins, although it lacks the typical structural features of C-type lectins. This suggests that SpaC may represent an unconventional lectin with diverse glycan recognition capabilities [141]. The functional similarity between SpaC and PGC-3 to mucus-binding pili raises the possibility that PGC-3 binds to mucins via glycans, similar to SpaA. Examples from other bacterial species highlight the versatility of MSCRAMMs. For instance, the N-terminal domain of RadA from Ruminococcus gnavus not only binds collagen, like many MSCRAMMs, but also recognizes human immunoglobulins (IgG and IgA) and glycans present on intestinal mucins. This glycan interaction can be competitively inhibited by monosaccharides such as Gal and GalNAc [142] (Table 8).

Table 8.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Enterococcus faecium and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Man [140]
Fuc [141]

Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacterial pathogen responsible for many uncomplicated skin infections and a variety of serious invasive infections worldwide each year. It is a major cause of pneumonia and other respiratory tract infections, surgical site, prosthetic joint and cardiovascular infections, and is a leading cause of hospital-acquired bacteremia [143]. Like E. faecium, S. aureus expresses a diverse array of MSCRAMMs that facilitate adhesion to various ECM components and support biofilm formation. As a typical sortase anchored protein, these proteins are attached to the cell wall via a C-terminal LPxTG motif [135]. The fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB, are sortase-anchored multidomain adhesins in S. aureus that interact with several mammalian targets. FnBPB binds plasminogen independently of fibrinogen via distinct lysine-rich sites, facilitating bacterial spread and immune evasion during infection. FnBPB dual binding capabilities as critical for S. aureus virulence and dissemination [144].

Clumping factors A and B (ClfA and ClfB) are high-affinity fibrinogen-binding adhesins in S. aureus, with ClfA also binding other glycoproteins, such as von Willebrand factor (vWF), through a non-covalently anchored vWF-binding protein [145]. Uniquely, ClfA exhibits force-sensitive adhesion, where weak bonds at low forces strengthen under high forces due to conformational changes, a catch-bond behavior that enables S. aureus to withstand shear forces in dynamic environments like blood flow [146]. Similarly, collagen-binding adhesin Cna helps S. aureus evade immune defenses, forming a "collagen shield" by binding collagen and C1q, which supports chronic infection by dampening immune responses, although Cna-negative strains spread more rapidly [147].

Surface proteins SasG in S. aureus and Aap in S. epidermidis, both possessing an LPxTG motif for cell wall anchoring, bind glycans with complex N-linked structures. SasG exists in two allelic variants: SasG-I and SasG-II, with SasG-II showing a broader ligand-binding capacity due to an arginine in its lectin domain which includes core 2 O-glycans [148]. Aap, SasG, and Pls (plasmin-sensitive protein) contain lectin domains that bind metal ions without the non-proline cis-peptide bond, suggesting an unconventional ligand-binding mechanism [149].

The serine‑rich repeat glycoprotein (SRRP) SraP further enhances S. aureus adhesion by interacting with sialylated receptors through its Neu5Ac-binding lectin-like module [150]. Finally, SpA, another cell wall-anchored protein, has heparin-binding properties, and alongside numerous other surface proteins with potential heparin-binding capability, underlines the broad adhesion profile of S. aureus and the need for further studies to elucidate these interactions [151,152] (Table 9).

Table 9.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Staphylococcus aureus and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Sialic acid (Neu5Ac) [150]
N-acetyl-d-lactosamine and 3′-sialyl-N-acetyllactosamine [148]
Core 2 O-glycans [148]
Heparin (disaccharide repeat consisting of GlcNAc and iduronic acid) [151]

Shigella spp.

Shigellosis is an infectious disease caused by Shigella species, which primarily targets the digestive system. It typically presents symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and fever. The genus Shigella consists of several species, each contributing to the overall disease burden in different regions of the world. Shigella dysenteriae preferentially adheres to colonic mucins, but this adhesion remains unaffected by preincubation with mucin monosaccharides. Although S. dysenteriae also binds to glycolipids, no specific glycan structures have been identified as its receptors [153].

S. flexneri engages in glycan–glycan interactions between its O-antigen polysaccharide (part of its polysaccharide) and the gangliosides GM1 and GM3 [154]. In serotype 2a, S. flexneri LPS specifically interacts with glycans from glycoprotein 2 (GP2), demonstrating its glycan-mediated adhesion capacity [155]. These interactions also involve sialyl Tn and Tn antigens present on MUC2 mucin [156]. Like many other bacterial species, including E. coli, Shigella also possesses type 1 pili that specifically target Man residues [157].

The type III secretion system (T3SS) attachment complex comprises the IpaB, IpaC, and IpaD proteins. IpaB and IpaC are responsible for forming pores in the membrane of eukaryotic cells. At the same time, IpaD plays a key role in the assembly of the complex by facilitating the incorporation of IpaB and IpaC [158]. IpaB interacts with CD44, a glycoprotein on epithelial cell surfaces that serves as a receptor for hyaluronic acid, suggesting a potential role for glycans in mediating this interaction [159]. Additionally, IpaB, along with IpaC and IpaD, facilitates S. flexneri invasion by interacting with the α5β1 integrin complex, although the precise contribution of glycans in these interactions remains to be elucidated [160]. Other potential adhesion mediators include IcsA (VirG) [161], the sap gene, which exhibits significant sequence similarity to the antigen 43 autotransporter of pathogenic E. coli [162], and OspE1/OspE2, which are activated by bile salt sensing through the T3SS [163]. However, the molecular details of their specific targets, including potential glycan involvement, remain unclear (Table 10).

Table 10.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Shigella spp. and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
GM1 and GM3 [154]
Glycans from GP2 [155]
Sialyl Tn and Tn Antigens [156]
Man [157]
Hyaluronic acid (disaccharide repeat consisting of GlcNAc and glucuronic acid) [159]

Salmonella spp.

Salmonella species are primarily acquired through oral transmission and are responsible for four major clinical syndromes: enteric fever (typhoid fever), enterocolitis/diarrhea, bacteremia, and chronic asymptomatic carriage [164]. Salmonella infections rely on the ability of the bacteria to adhere to host cells to cause these syndromes. For example, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) has been shown to recognize the glycan Galβ1–3GalNAc on Caco-2 cells, although the exact adhesins involved in this recognition process remain unidentified [165]. On the contrary, the presence of terminal GalNAc, through the action of glycosyltransferase β1–4N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2, has been shown to have minimal impact on S. Typhimurium adhesion to epithelial cells [166]. Three key adhesins, type I pilus, plasmid-encoded fimbriae (Pef), and Std, have been characterized for their interactions with distinct oligosaccharide motifs (Table 11).

Table 11.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Salmonella spp. and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Galβ1–3GalNAc [165]
Man [65,167,168]
α1–2Fuc [171,172,174]
LeX [175,176]
Blood groups [155]

Type 1 pili, which mediate Man-sensitive hemagglutination and facilitate attachment to host cells, are present in Salmonella enterica serovars but are absent in S. bongori. Interestingly, the type 1 pili of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Pullorum and Gallinarum were initially classified as type 2 fimbriae due to their inability to bind Man. This difference was later attributed to specific amino acid substitutions in the FimH protein compared to S. Typhimurium [167,168]. Later, nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in FimH were identified, resulting in amino acid changes that affect its host-specific binding and facilitate the adaptation of S. Typhimurium to different hosts [169]. In S. Typhimurium, the FimH protein facilitates adhesion to enterocytes, while in E. coli, FimH preferentially binds to bladder epithelial cells [170]. In both species, glycoprotein 2 (GP2), uniquely expressed on the apical plasma membrane of M cells in the intestinal epithelium, is recognized by the type 1 pilus through Man-binding [65]. S. Typhimurium utilizes its Std pili to adhere to colonic epithelial cells by targeting α1–2Fuc found on N-linked glycans and mucus glycoproteins [171,172]. This adhesion is a crucial step in its infection strategy, which is further supported by its ability to metabolize elevated Fuc levels in the inflamed gut, enhancing growth and colonization, particularly following microbiota disruption [173,174]. Pef exhibits specific binding to the Lex, predominantly expressed on crypt epithelial cells. This interaction suggests a potential role for Pef in facilitating Salmonella adhesion to the crypt epithelium in humans [175]. Finally, the pef operon, responsible for Pef production, is found on the virulence plasmid of S. Typhimurium. It is also present in S. Enteritidis, S. Bovismorbificans, S. Paratyphi C, and S. Choleraesuis, although two genes found in S. Typhimurium are missing [176].

Furthermore, one of the surface-exposed molecules on Salmonella, LPS, has been shown to target blood group antigens through glycan-glycan interactions in S. Typhimurium [155].

Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the bacterium that causes gonorrhea, is a major global public health problem, particularly because of complications that disproportionately affect women, such as pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, infertility and increased susceptibility to HIV [177]. N. meningitidis can asymptomatically colonize the human oropharynx and, although rare, enter the bloodstream to cause invasive meningococcal disease, resulting in life-threatening conditions such as meningitis and septicemia, as well as other complications such as pneumonia, arthritis, urethritis, and conjunctivitis [178]. Whereas N. meningitidis is known to possess several well-defined adhesins that mediate interactions with host glycans, the specific adhesins and glycan interactions involved in N. gonorrhoeae adhesion are mostly unknown (Table 12). For example, the trimeric autotransporter adhesin NhhA (Neisseria hsf homologue) and NHBA (Neisserial Heparin Binding Antigen) in N. meningitidis bind to heparan sulfate [[179], [180], [181]]. Although N. gonorrhoeae shares some adhesins with similar binding properties to N. meningitidis, it utilizes distinct mechanisms for adherence and invasion of male urethral epithelial cells. Notably, N. gonorrhoeae NHBA exhibits a stronger binding affinity for heparin than chondroitin sulfate and glucose 6-phosphate, unlike its N. meningitidis counterpart. Moreover, N. gonorrhoeae NHBA, but not that of N. meningitidis, interacts with Lex, sialyl Lex, lacto-N-neotetraose, and their sialylated variants [182].

Table 12.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Neisseria spp. and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Heparan sulfate (disaccharide repeat consisting of GlcNAc and glucuronic acid with sulfate on hydroxyl groups) [[179], [180], [181],[185], [186], [187]]
Lex [182]
sialylated Lex [182]
Lacto-N-neotetraose [182]
Sialylated-lacto-N-neotetraose [182]
Sialylated poly-N-acetyllactosamine [183]
Syndecan 1 (heparan sulfate proteoglycan) [188]
Chondroitin sulfate (disaccharide repeat consisting of GalNAc and glucuronic acid with sulfate on hydroxyl groups) [182]

The initial attachment in N. gonorrhoeae is facilitated by pili, with subsequent adherence steps leading to tighter binding mediated by "opacity-associated" (Opa) proteins responsible for the opaque phenotype of agar-grown colonies. In N. meningitidis, T4P bind to Basigin/CD147, a glycosylated transmembrane protein of the immunoglobulin superfamily, via sialylated poly-N-acetyllactosamine-containing N-glycans [183]. While direct evidence for N. gonorrhoeae T4P binding is still lacking, the PilC protein - identified as the tip-localized adhesin of T4P in both bacteria - has been shown to interact with closely related epithelial cell receptors [184].

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans, previously introduced as key mediators of adhesion in Neisseria, play a critical role in N. gonorrhoeae attachment, particularly through interactions with OpaA proteins that bind to syndecan receptors [185]. This interaction highlights the essential role of syndecans, particularly syndecans 1 and 4, in facilitating bacterial attachment and invasion by binding to the hypervariable region 1 of the OpaA protein [186,187]. The GAG chains of cell surface syndecan 1 (Sdc1) further enhance bacterial pathogenesis by promoting bacterial attachment to host cells. When bacterial adhesins bind to these Sdc1 chains, signals are transmitted through the highly conserved Sdc1 cytoplasmic domain, potentially leading to N. gonorrhoeae uptake into host cells [188].

Medium priority

Streptococcus pneumoniae, Group A and Group B Streptococci

Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus, GAS) [189] and Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) [190] are important human pathogens known to cause a variety of infections, including throat and skin infections, as well as serious invasive diseases. Streptococcus pneumoniae is associated with several infections, including pneumonia, meningitis, bacteremia, and sinusitis [191]. GAS binds sialic acid residues on mucins during colonization, primarily through their outer surface M protein, a key virulence factor containing a LPxTG motif [192]. The M protein shows variability among GAS strains, and Rebecca Lancefield's M typing system, established in 1928, became the gold standard for serotyping. However, it has faced challenges due to limited antisera and high non-typability in tropical isolates. Instead, emm typing, based on sequence analysis of a portion of the M protein gene, now provides an alternative approach that closely correlates with traditional M serotyping [193,194]. This variability not only affects the accuracy of typing, but also affects the interactions of the M protein with host tissues [195]. Among the different emm-types, the M6, emm49 bind to GAGs, while M1, M3, M12 of this protein has a different binding affinity for ABO blood group antigens, lewis antigens and sialic acids [196,197]. The GBS surface alpha C protein contains a GAG-binding domain that has been shown to promote the bacterial penetration of the Drosophila blood-brain barrier as well as the adhesion to and the invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells [198]. Similarly, choline binding protein A (CbpA) interacts with factor H to enhance adherence and subsequent internalization of S. pneumoniae through GAGs [199]. Furthermore, GlcNAcβ1–3 Gal inhibits S. pneumoniae adherence to epithelial cells, although the specific adhesin(s) responsible for this interaction remain unidentified [200]. Notably, β-galactosidase BgaA and neuraminidase A NanA have lectin domains that enable them to act as adhesins independently of their enzymatic functions [201].

In GAS (PulA) and S. pneumoniae (SpuA), surface-anchored pullulanases have glycogen-binding modules that allow multivalent interactions with glycogen. These interactions are mediated by pullulanase-associated CBM41 modules, which are common to starch/glycogen debranching enzymes of the GH13 family (based on the Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes database (CAZy)) [202]. Bacteria first enter alveolar cells after binding to specific ligand including glycans. Once inside, their ability to bind to glycogen allows them to degrade the polysaccharide and gain a metabolic advantage within the host [203,204].

Other adhesins have been identified, although less is known about their specific molecular targets. To date, SpeB from GAS has been shown to bind glycoproteins such as thyroglobulin, fetuin, mucin, asialofetuin, and laminin [205], while also functioning as a broad-spectrum protease capable of cleaving over 200 host proteins [206]. Several streptococcal adhesins target ECM proteins. For example, SfbI (Streptococcal fibronectin-binding protein I) in GAS binds to fibronectin [207], while LraI (lipoprotein receptor antigen I) in GBS, a lipoprotein, binds to laminin [208]. Srr1 and Srr2 a member of the MSCRAMM along with FbsA, FbsB, and FbsC, are surface-associated proteins encoded by GBS that bind to fibrinogen [209,210]. Similarly, the adhesin RrgA from a pilus protein found in multiple Streptococcus species, also targets ECM proteins [211]. A total of seven components are essential for the formation of this pilus, including the rlrA regulatory element, the backbone forming pilin (RrgB), RrgA, a minor pilin (RrgC), and three sortases (SrtC-1, SrtC-2, and SrtC-3) [212]. The ligand-binding vWFA domain of RrgA has two arm-like protrusions that form a U-shaped cradle composed of basic residues that may serve as a binding site for negatively charged glycan carbohydrates [211]. Interestingly, Spr1345 from S. pneumoniae R6 encodes a mucin-binding protein (MucBP), part of a group of surface proteins that promote bacterial adhesion to host mucins. The first MucBP, named Mub, was discovered in Limosilactobacillus reuteri, where it was identified as a high molecular weight protein with 14 repeats of the mucin-binding domain (MucBD) [213]. In contrast, Spr1345 is a low molecular weight MucBP containing only a single MucBD. In addition to this domain, Spr1345 has a proline-rich region and a C-terminal LPxTG motif that is recognized and cleaved by sortase [214]. The MucBD is predicted to interact with mucins and various polysaccharides such as hyaluronan, suggesting a potential specificity for the carbohydrate moiety of mucins [215].

In Streptococcus sanguinis, T4P plays a central role in adhesion, and their glycan-binding specificity suggests the possibility of similar lectin-mediated interactions in other Streptococcus species. The minor pilin PilA stabilizes another minor pilin, PilC, which contains a lectin module that specifically binds sialylated glycans, particularly those with an α2–3-sialyl linkage, such as 3′-sialyllactose and 3′-sialyl-N-acetyllactosamine. PilC can also recognize ligands such as ganglioside GD1a, oligosaccharides with the Sda antigen, and sulfated GAGs [216]. In Streptococcus gordonii and S. sanguinis, serine‑rich repeat (SRR) adhesins - specifically Hsa, GspB, and SrpA - bind Neu5Ac/Neu5Gcα2–3 through their Siglec-like domains [217] (Table 13).

Table 13.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Group A and Group B Streptococci and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Sialic acid [192,196,197,216,217]
GAGs [[196], [197], [198]]
ABO blood groups [196,197]
Lewis antigens [196]
GlcNAcβ1–3Gal [200]
Glycogen [202]
Mucins [205,215]
GD1a [216]
Sda antigen [216]
Sulfated GAGs [216]

Haemophilus influenzae

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a human-adapted pathogen that primarily infects the respiratory tract. It is a common cause of otitis media, community-acquired pneumonia, and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [218]. Its ability to interact with host glycan structures, especially sialic acid, enhances its adherence to epithelial cells (Table 14). NTHi lipooligosaccharides (LOS) have been shown to preferentially adhere to Lewis structures on host cell surfaces via glycan–glycan interactions. Interestingly, the removal of sialic acid from the LOS enhances bacterial adherence, highlighting the role of sialylation in modulating bacterial interactions with host cells [155]. The major NTHi adhesin Hia, a phase-variable autotransporter protein, acts as a dual-function lectin, binding with high affinity to human respiratory tract sialic acid glycan receptors, particularly Neu5Acα2–6Galβ1–4GlcNAc (2–6 SLN-Ac), via its BD1 domain [219]. Specific amino acid residues, including D618, A620, and R674 mediate this interaction. Additionally, the BD2 domain of Hia can bind the Neu5Acα2–3Galβ1–4GlcN- (2–3 SLN-Ac) epitope, and Hia expression in NTHi strains induces the formation of dense biofilms on epithelial cells. Other lectin adhesins, such as HMW1 and HMW2, play critical roles in the adherence of H. influenzae to sialylated glycan structures. They are trimeric autotransporters (TAA) with heavy molecular weight proteins. HMW2 shows a preference for 2–6 SLN-Ac and HMW1 favors 2–3 SLN, further underscoring the importance of sialic acid in H. influenzae pathogenicity [220,221]. Furthermore, outer membrane proteins P2 and P5 interact specifically with sialic acid-containing oligosaccharides on nasopharyngeal mucins, facilitating bacterial colonization [222,223]. Similarly, H. influenzae fimbriae (HIF) allows attachment to human respiratory mucins [224]. Other NTHi adhesins, although less well characterized in terms of their molecular targets, also play important roles in host interactions. One such adhesin is Hap, which binds to extracellular matrix components like collagen IV and laminin and serves as the primary ligand for fibronectin [225]. In addition, several other NTHi adhesins contribute to its adhesion capabilities. For instance, Protein E (PE) mediates adherence to both epithelial cells and vitronectin, while P4, a surface-associated lipoprotein is essential for binding to vitronectin and for the bacterium's survival in the middle ear [226].

Table 14.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Haemophilus influenzae and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Sialic acid [155,219,[221], [222], [223]]
Lewis antigens [155]
2–6 SLN-Ac, 2–3 SLN-Ac [219,221]
Mucins (Human respiratory) [224]

Other pathogens no longer on the WHO 2024 list

Helicobacter pylori

The genome of Helicobacter pylori, a human gastric pathogen responsible for stomach ulcers and gastric cancer, encodes a diverse array of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) located in the bacterial cell envelope, which are classified into six groups: Hop (H. pylori OMPs), Hor (Hop-related), Hof (Helicobacter OMPs), Hom (Helicobacter outer membrane), iron-regulated OMPs, and efflux pump OMPs. Many H. pylori OMPs, particularly those in the Hop family, are predicted to function as porins or adhesins, aiding the bacterium in binding to the gastric mucosa [227,228] (Table 15). Notably, the blood group antigen–binding adhesin, BabA (HopS), the sialic acid-binding adhesin, SabA (HopP), and the lacdiNAc-binding adhesin, LabA (HopD) are known to recognize glycan residues [[229], [230], [231], [232]].

Table 15.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Helicobacter pylori and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
Leb [239]
Blood group ABO glycans [230]
α2–3 linked Neu5Ac [232,[246], [247], [248]]
LacdiNAc [231]

H. pylori infection begins via the oral route, where initial attachment can occur with salivary proteins such as MUC5B and the glycoprotein, deleted in malignant brain tumors-1 (DMBT1) [[233], [234], [235]]. Once in the stomach, H. pylori targets the gastric mucosa by interacting with mucins, secreted MUC5AC and membrane-bound MUC1 [236]. However, when H. pylori binds to MUC1, the bacteria are removed from the epithelial cell surface as MUC1 acts like a releasable decoy [237,238]. The BabA adhesin, was the first adhesin able to recognize carbohydrates described in H. pylori which binds to ABO/Lewisb histo-blood group antigens (Leb) [239]. It is one of the 35 most highly differentiated genes across populations in 723 H. pylori strains isolated worldwide [240]. babA genomic diversity varies not only across populations but also within different regions of the human stomach in the same individual [241]. H. pylori strains expressing the BabA protein can be categorized as either "specialists" or "generalists" based on their ABO blood group antigen preferences. Specialist strains specifically bind to blood group O glycans, whereas generalist strains can bind to glycans from blood groups O, A, and B [230]. This distinction is due to a single amino acid substitution in the carbohydrate-binding domain of BabA. Ib specialists strains the position 198 is occupied by a leucine, making part of the carbohydrate-binding domain inaccessible for binding to larger glycans from blood groups A and B. In contrast, this position is occupied by a serine in generalist strains, allowing them to bind to glycans from all three blood groups [242]. Notably, significant differences in Leb binding have been linked to the geographic origin of H. pylori strains. While some strains exhibited high levels of Leb binding, others showed little to no detectable binding [243,244]. Further studies are needed to determine the molecular basis for the differential ability of different H. pylori strains to recognize histo-blood group antigens [245].

When H. pylori colonizes the human gastric mucosa, it triggers inflammation and alters the glycosylation of the host tissues, leading to the new expression of α2–3linked Neu5Ac, including sialyl-Lewisa (sLea) and sialyl-Lewisx (sLex) [232]. The SabA adhesin recognizes and binds to these glycans, which are carried on gangliosides identified as Neu5Acα2–3neolactohexaosylceramide and Neu5Acα2–3neolactooctaosylceramide [246]. Another protein secreted by H. pylori, HP0721, binds strongly to the gangliosides GD1a and GM3. However, HP0721 is not thought to mediate high-affinity adhesion but may instead contribute to bacterial colonization by facilitating the use of sialic acid as a nutrient source [247,248].

The most recent H. pylori adhesin discovered to bind carbohydrates is LabA, which can recognize the lacdiNAc motif (GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc) on MUC5AC [231]. Interestingly, among several adhesins, only SabA and LabA were shown to be downregulated in response to lactate, mediated by the CheA/CheY signaling system [249]. The effect of lactate on microbial virulence is well documented, suggesting that LabA may play a role in H. pylori virulence, particularly through its involvement in the CheA/CheY system, which has been implicated in bacterial adhesion in other species [250,251]. However, structural analysis of LabA suggests that the lacdiNAc motif may not be its in vivo ligand, leaving the binding specificity to lacdiNAc residues unclear and requiring further investigation [252].

Campylobacter spp.

Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of gastroenteritis. In addition to acute infection, C. jejuni can trigger autoimmune disorders such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and its variant, Miller Fisher syndrome. The development of GBS is attributed to molecular mimicry between gangliosides and the LOS of the bacterium, leading to an immune response that mistakenly targets the host's nervous system [253]. The number of Campylobacter spp. adhesins targeting glycans is limited in the literature (Table 16). However, C. jejuni is known to recognize fucosylated structures, specifically targeting α1,2-fucosylated carbohydrate moieties that contain the H blood group epitope, found on human tissues and in human milk [254,255]. C. jejuni exhibits the ability to bind to the major human intestinal mucin, MUC2, and can also swim toward it. This is partly driven by the presence of l-Fuc, which is metabolized via a metabolic cluster also found in C. coli [[256], [257], [258]]. Glycan array analyses have shown that C. jejuni interacts not only with Fuc but with Gal, sialic acid, Man, GlcN, and glycosaminoglycans [259]. Specifically, C. jejuni binds O-glycans via core 1, core 2, H antigen, and Lewis antigens (Leb, Ley, Lex) [260]. Two adhesins mediate these interactions: the major subunit of C. jejuni flagella, FlaA, and the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) [260,261].

Table 16.

This table lists glycans and monosaccharides recognized by Campylobacter jejuni and the corresponding literature.

Glycan/monosaccharide recognized Literature
H blood group epitope [254,255,260]
Fuc [[256], [257], [258],263]
Gal [259,262,264]
Sialic acid [259,264]
Man [259,264]
Glucosamine [259,264]
GAGs [259,264]
Core 1 and Core 2 O-glycans [260]
Leb, Ley, Lex, Lea [260,263]
Rha [263]
GM1 [263]

Like other bacteria, C. jejuni can bind to terminal Gal and GalNAc on human glycans via its LOS with glycan-glycan interactions, and it can bind to blood groups and Lewis antigens with high affinity. These terminal monosaccharides, when present on GAGs, can inhibit the bacterial binding [155].

Interestingly, a Gal-sensing chemoreceptor (initially named Tlp11 and renamed CcrG for Campylobacter ChemoReceptor for Gal) in C. jejuni, can sense MUC1 and increase bacterial adhesion, a process that the presence of free Gal in the medium can completely inhibit. Given this interaction, CcrG likely plays a key role in detecting host cell surface glycans, particularly those with Gal moieties, thereby enhancing bacterial adherence to host tissues [262]. Similarly, the chemoreceptor Tlp10 also recognizes glycan ligands, but has two ligand binding sites: Site A binds arginine, α-ketoglutarate, fumarate, and other non-monosaccharide ligands, while site B is specific for glycan ligands containing Man, Fuc, Rhamnose, sialic acid, and Gal residues. Tlp10 can bind complex host glycans, including terminal and intermediate residues of structures like fucosylated human ganglioside GM1 and the Lea antigen [263].

Development of antibacterial adhesion

To develop effective carbohydrate and glycan mimetics as inhibitors of pathogen binding to host cells, it is essential to identify common glycans that serve as bacterial adhesin targets. The table below highlights key glycans shared by at least two of the listed bacterial species, emphasizing their potential as therapeutic targets (Table 17). These synthetic molecules, designed to mimic the structure of natural carbohydrates, are engineered to enhance binding affinity, stability, and specificity while remaining cost-effective and easier to manufacture than most natural glycans, which often require complex extraction and purification processes. Notably, multivalent glycan mimetics display multiple carbohydrate motifs on a single backbone, significantly strengthening binding through multivalent interactions. This strategy effectively disrupts bacterial adhesion and holds great promise for the development of novel anti-adhesion therapies against bacterial infections [265]. Targeting the biosynthesis of adhesins also holds promise, as this would interrupt the production of critical binding molecules, impeding bacterial colonization at the source [266]. Another promising direction involves the design of multivalent glycoconjugates, which can simultaneously bind multiple bacterial adhesins to block adhesion effectively. Dendrimers, for example, have been developed to inhibit the FimH adhesin in E. coli, reducing bacterial attachment by occupying multiple binding sites at once [267]. An alternative approach could be to target the catch bond mechanism itself. Initially identified in the type I pilus, catch bonds have also been observed in other adhesins, including the type 3 pilus found in various Enterobacteriales [107]. In contrast, the Sdr adhesin from S. aureus utilizes a distinct "dock, lock, and latch" (DLL) mechanism. In this process, the target ligand first binds to a groove on the adhesin, followed by locking through specific protein domains, and finally a latching by an additional structural element that stabilizes the interaction, even under mechanical force [268,269]. The development of allosteric inhibitors to disrupt catch bonds and the DLL mechanism could provide a novel way to modulate bacterial adhesion without directly competing at the primary binding sites. For FimH, allosteric inhibitors could stabilize its open conformation, preventing the transition to the closed, high-affinity state under mechanical force. By binding to non-active regions, such small molecules can "lock" FimH in a low-affinity state, thereby reducing its resistance to force without directly targeting the mannose-binding site. For the SdrG DLL mechanism, allosteric inhibitors could target the domains responsible for locking and latching, thus preventing the structural changes required for stable binding even if initial docking occurs.

Table 17.

Summary of the main glycan receptors recognized by bacterial lectins and adhesins.

Glycan receptor type Pathogen Lectins
Heparan sulfate Neisseria gonorrhoeae NhhA, NHBA and OpaA
Mycobacterium tuberculosis HBHA
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagellum
Hyaluronic acid Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3194c
Shigella spp. IpaB
Sialic acid E. coli K99, F17bG, Ucl, Sfa
Proteus spp. Uca, MR/P
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagellum
Staphylococcus aureus SraP
Shigella spp. Serotype 2a, S. flexneri LPS
Neisseria gonorrhoeae NHBA, T4P
Group A Streptococcus M protein
Streptococcus sanguinis T4P
Haemophilus influenzae Hia, HMW1, HMW2
Helicobacter pylori SabA
Campylobacter spp. Chemoreceptor Tlp10
Gangliosides Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagellum
Campylobacter spp. Tlp10
Blood groups E. coli F18 (FedF)
Salmonella Typhimurium LPS
Campylobacter spp. FlaA, MOMP
Mucins Pseudomonas aeruginosa LecA, LecB
Haemophilus influenzae HIF, P2, P5
Streptococcus pneumoniae SpeB, MucBP
Antigens Lewis Neisseria gonorrhoeae NHBA
Haemophilus influenzae LOS
N-acetylglucosamine E. coli F17 G fimbriae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Mannose Acinetobacter baumannii CsuA/BABCDE pilus
E. coli FimH
Enterococcus faecium SpaC
Salmonella enterica Type 1 pili
Shigella spp. Type 1 pili
Fucose Pseudomonas aeruginosa LecB
Enterococcus faecium SpaC
Campylobacter spp. Tlp10
Salmonella Typhimurium Std pili
Galactose Acinetobacter baumannii Ata
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LecA
Campylobacter spp. CcrG, Tlp10
Globotriaosylceramide E. coli PapG
Pseudomonas aeruginosa LecA
Lactotetraosylceramide Acinetobacter baumannii
E. coli CFA/I pilus
LewisX Salmonella spp. Pef
Neisseria gonorrhoeae NHBA
Sulfated glycosaminoglycans Mycobacterium tuberculosis MUL_3720
Streptococcus pneumoniae PilC

The abbreviations represent: NHBA: Neisseria Heparin-Binding Antigen, NhhA: Neisseria hia/hemagglutinin adhesion, OpaA: Opacity-associated outer membrane protein, HBHA: Heparin-binding hemagglutinin, Rv3194c: Hyaluronan-binding adhesin, IpaB: Invasion plasmid antigen B, K99: Sialic acid-binding adhesin, F17bG: Fimbrial adhesin, Ucl: Uropathogenic E. coli fimbriae, Sfa: S-fimbriae, Uca: Uropathogenic cell adhesin, MR/P: Mannose-resistant Proteus-Like fimbriae, SraP: Sialic acid-binding adhesin in Staphylococcus aureus, LPS: Lipopolysaccharide, T4P: Type IV pili, M protein: Virulence-associated protein in Group A Streptococcus, HMW1/HMW2: High molecular weight adhesin 1/2, SabA: Sialic acid-binding adhesin, FlaA: Flagellin protein, MOMP: Major outer membrane protein, F18 (FedF): Fimbrial adhesin in E. coli, SpeB: Streptococcal cysteine protease, MucBP: Mucin-binding protein, LOS: Lipooligosaccharide, F17G: N-acetylglucosamine-binding fimbrial adhesion, CsuA/BABCDE: Chaperone-usher pilus system, SpaC: Pili-associated adhesin, Std: Fucose-binding fimbriae, Ata: Autotransporter adhesin, CcrG: Galactose-binding chemoreceptor, PapG: Galabiose-binding adhesion, CFA/I: Colonization factor antigen I, Pef: Plasmid-encoded fimbriae, MUL_3720: Sulfated glycan-binding adhesin, PilC: Pilus-associated adhesin.

Surface sensing, or mechanosensing, plays a critical role in bacterial colonization by allowing cells to detect and respond to mechanical stimuli from surfaces [270]. This process is essential for bacterial pathogens to identify and bind to host surfaces, including glycans, which is a critical step in colonization. Targeting and disrupting surface sensing mechanisms can disrupt this process and prevent pathogens from colonizing host surfaces.

Intermediate hosts for transmission to humans

Understanding the interactions between humans, animals, and pathogens in shared environments is essential to the One Health framework, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health. This is particularly important in the context of bacterial pathogens that can be transmitted through contaminated fresh produce. While much attention has been paid to human-animal interactions, pathogenic bacteria also target a variety of glycans on intermediate hosts such as plants. However, this aspect of host-pathogen interactions remains underexplored in scientific literature. Among the few examples, in E. coli, the FimH adhesin can be expressed at low temperatures compatible with plant growth and has been shown to specifically bind mannose-containing polysaccharides and plant-derived N-glycans [271]. Similarly, the Yad pilus of E. coli K-12 and the E. coli common pilus (ECP) are expressed at low temperatures and facilitate adhesion to plant cell walls through interactions with xylose and arabinan residues, respectively [272,273]. In addition, while the F9 pilus is known for its role in binding terminal Gal residues on mammalian tissues, it has also been found to interact with galactosylated hemicellulose in plant cell walls [274]. These examples highlight the versatility of bacterial adhesins in targeting glycans in different host types, including plants, and underscore the importance of expanding research on plant-bacteria interactions as part of the One Health framework. This could provide valuable insights into how bacterial pathogens spread and persist across environmental interfaces.

Perspectives and future research directions

To date, most studies investigating interactions between bacterial adhesins and glycoproteins have primarily focused on single glycan epitopes. However, a new paradigm is emerging that focuses on characterizing interactions between bacterial adhesins and glycan patches within glycoproteins, paving the way for an exciting new area of research. This approach highlights the importance of glycan landscapes, where clusters of multiple glycans coalesce to form patches that create a more relevant context for bacterial adhesion [275,276]. In these cases, terminal glycan epitopes may serve as a "barcode" recognized by bacterial adhesins. Such recognition requires highly glycosylated proteins, a feature particularly typical of secreted mucins, but this concept can also be extended to glycolipids or hybrid interactions between glycolipids and glycoproteins. This is particularly relevant during inflammation in mucosal tissues, where disruption of the mucus barrier may allow the co-existence of mucins and membrane-bound glycomolecules [277]. Studying the microbial biology of these glycan patches, including their specific arrangements and compositions, will provide valuable insights into how bacterial pathogens navigate and exploit the host environment. Future studies of glycan patch recognition by bacterial adhesins will require the integration of advanced experimental and computational approaches. The development of synthetic glycan libraries and engineered glycoproteins is essential to accurately mimic natural glycan landscapes. This is exemplified by a cell-based platform that displays human glycodomains with tunable structures and patterns of O-glycans, allowing precise manipulation of glycan configurations [278]. These developments will have to be performed in association with structural biology techniques such as X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM to reveal detailed adhesin-glycan interactions. Similarly, surface-based assays such as glycan arrays and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) are likely to be used for high-throughput binding analysis. Super-resolution microscopy and mass spectrometry-based glycomics, including MALDI imaging, could provide insight into the structure and composition of glycan patches. The development of molecular dynamics simulations will be needed to model the dynamic nature of adhesin-glycan interactions in such complex interactions. As an illustration, mucinases from human gut bacteria, such as Akkermansia muciniphila, cleave peptide bonds in mucins by recognizing adjacent O-glycans, specifically targeting bonds between contiguous (bis) O-glycans [279].

Another important aspect of enzymes is their effect on bacterial adhesion through the production of glycosyl hydrolases (GH) that modify exposed glycans. For example, S. pneumoniae encodes extracellular glycosidases that enhance adhesion by modifying host glycoconjugates to expose glycan receptors via the pneumococcal neuraminidase A (NanA) [280]. The study of bacterial adhesion is evolving, with new research perspectives highlighting the critical role of GH in modulating this process. Because GH can alter the structure and availability of glycan receptors on host tissues, they may significantly influence bacterial binding. Future studies should consider how the specific GH produced by different bacterial species might affect bacterial binding to host glycans.

Host glycans play a critical role in mediating bacterial adhesion and serve as receptors that many pathogens exploit to establish infection. Targeting these host-pathogen interactions offers a promising strategy to prevent bacterial colonization and reduce reliance on antibiotics. At the same time, bacterial glycoconjugates - such as capsular polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, and glycoproteins - are key virulence factors that not only facilitate adhesion but also help bacteria evade immune responses. These bacterial glycans represent valuable targets for vaccine development. Conjugate vaccines, which couple bacterial polysaccharides to carrier proteins to enhance immunogenicity, have proven successful against pathogens such as S. pneumoniae or K. pneumoniae. Extending these approaches to a broader range of bacterial glycoconjugates could strengthen our arsenal against multidrug-resistant infections [281].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Clara Dessenne: Writing – original draft, Data curation. Christophe Mariller: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Formal analysis. Olivier Vidal: Writing – original draft. Isabelle Huvent: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Yann Guerardel: Writing – review & editing. Elisabeth Elass-Rochard: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Yannick Rossez: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

I have no conflicts of interest to declare, and the same applies to all associated authors.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation (C.D.).

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • 1.Rice L.B. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J. Infect. Dis. 2008;197:1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller W.R., Arias C.A. ESKAPE pathogens: antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, clinical impact and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024 doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01054-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jesudason T. WHO publishes updated list of bacterial priority pathogens. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5 doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jensen P.H., Kolarich D., Packer N.H. Mucin-type O-glycosylation – putting the pieces together. FEBS. J. 2010;277:81–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kamhi E., Joo E.J., Dordick J.S., Linhardt R.J. Glycosaminoglycans in infectious disease. Biol. Rev. 2013;88:928–943. doi: 10.1111/brv.12034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schnaar R.L., Sandhoff R., Tiemeyer M., Kinoshita T. Glycosphingolipids. 2022 doi: 10.1101/glycobiology.4e.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krachler A.M., Orth K. Targeting the bacteria–host interface. Virulence. 2013;4:284–294. doi: 10.4161/viru.24606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asadi A., Razavi S., Talebi M., Gholami M. A review on anti-adhesion therapies of bacterial diseases. Infection. 2019;47:13–23. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1222-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Monzon V., Lafita A., Bateman A. Discovery of fibrillar adhesins across bacterial species. BMC. Genomics. 2021;22:550. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07586-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abbasnia S., Hashem Asnaashari A.M., Sharebiani H., Soleimanpour S., Mosavat A., Rezaee S.A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and host interactions in the manifestation of tuberculosis. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 2024;36 doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar S., Puniya B.L., Parween S., Nahar P., Ramachandran S. Identification of novel adhesins of M. tuberculosis H37Rv using integrated approach of multiple computational algorithms and experimental analysis. PLoS. One. 2013;8:e69790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Squeglia F., Ruggiero A., De Simone A., Berisio R. A structural overview of mycobacterial adhesins: key biomarkers for diagnostics and therapeutics. Protein Sci. 2018;27:369–380. doi: 10.1002/pro.3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vinod V., Vijayrajratnam S., Vasudevan A.K., Biswas R. The cell surface adhesins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol. Res. 2020;232 doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.126392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Viljoen A., Dufrêne Y.F., Nigou J. Mycobacterial adhesion: from hydrophobic to receptor-ligand interactions. Microorganisms. 2022;10:454. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Daher W., Pichler V., Karam J., Neyrolles O., Kremer L. The molecular basis and downstream immune consequences of mycobacteria–host cell interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2023;47 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maharajh R., Pillay M., Senzani S. A computational method for the prediction and functional analysis of potential Mycobacterium tuberculosis adhesin-related proteins. Expert. Rev. Proteomics. 2023;20:483–493. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2023.2275678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh Desh Deepak, Jeyakani Justin. Scanning the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to identify potential lectins. Protein Pept. Lett. 2007;14:683–691. doi: 10.2174/092986607781483813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abhinav K.V., Sharma A., Vijayan M. Identification of mycobacterial lectins from genomic data. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 2013;81:644–657. doi: 10.1002/prot.24219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kolbe K., Veleti S.K., Reiling N., Lindhorst T.K. Lectins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis – rarely studied proteins. Beilstein. J. Org. Chem. 2019;15:1–15. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.15.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sundar S., Thangamani L., Piramanayagam S., Natarajan J. Discovering mycobacterial lectins as potential drug targets and vaccine candidates for tuberculosis treatment: a theoretical approach. J. Proteins Proteomics. 2021;12:93–104. doi: 10.1007/s42485-021-00065-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Menozzi F.D., Bischoff R., Fort E., Brennan M.J., Locht C. Molecular characterization of the mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin, a mycobacterial adhesin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998;95:12625–12630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pethe K., Aumercier M., Fort E., Gatot C., Locht C., Menozzi F.D. Characterization of the heparin-binding site of the mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin adhesin. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:14273–14280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Delogu G., Brennan M.J. Functional domains present in the mycobacterial hemagglutinin, HBHA. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:7464–7469. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.24.7464-7469.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pethe K., Alonso S., Biet F., Delogu G., Brennan M.J., Locht C., Menozzi F.D. The heparin-binding haemagglutinin of M. tuberculosis is required for extrapulmonary dissemination. Nature. 2001;412:190–194. doi: 10.1038/35084083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.De Maio F., Squeglia F., Goletti D., Delogu G. The mycobacterial HBHA protein: a promising biomarker for tuberculosis. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019;26:2051–2060. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666181029165805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Choi J.A., Lim Y.J., Cho S.N., Lee J.H., Jeong J.A., Kim E.J., Park J.B., Kim S.H., Park H.S., Kim H.J., Song C.H. Mycobacterial HBHA induces endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis through the generation of reactive oxygen species and cytosolic Ca2+ in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Cell Death. Dis. 2013;4:e957. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.489. –e957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verbelen C., Dupres V., Raze D., Bompard C., Locht C., Dufrêne Y.F. Interaction of the mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin with actin, as evidenced by single-molecule force spectroscopy. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190:7614–7620. doi: 10.1128/JB.00974-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Raze D., Verwaerde C., Deloison G., Werkmeister E., Coupin B., Loyens M., Brodin P., Rouanet C., Locht C. Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin Adhesin (HBHA) is involved in intracytosolic lipid inclusions formation in mycobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zimmermann N., Saiga H., Houthuys E., Moura-Alves P., Koehler A., Bandermann S., Dorhoi A., Kaufmann S.H.E. Syndecans promote mycobacterial internalization by lung epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:1846–1856. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao D., Lin D., Xu C. A protein fragment of Rv3194c located on mycobacterial cell surface efficiently prevents adhesion of recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis, and promises a new anti-adhesive drug. Microb. Pathog. 2020;149 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kundu M., Basu J., Chakrabarti P. Purification and characterization of an extracellular lectin from Mycobacterium smegmatis. FEBS Lett. 1989;256:207–210. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81749-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goswami S., Sarkar S., Basu J., Kundu M., Chakrabarti P. Mycotin: a lectin involved in the adherence of Mycobacteria to macrophages. FEBS Lett. 1994;355:183–186. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01203-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Anton V., Rougé P., Daffé M. Identification of the sugars involved in mycobacterial cell aggregation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1996;144:167–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nogueira L., Cardoso F.C., Mattos A.M., Bordignon J., Figueiredo C.P., Dahlstrom P., Frota C.C., Duarte dos Santos C.N., Chalhoub M., Cavada B.S., Teixeira H.C., Oliveira S.C., Barral-Netto M., Báfica A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv1419 encodes a secreted 13 kDa lectin with immunological reactivity during human tuberculosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:744–753. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Agus R., ode siti Purnamasari W., dengen Parura R., Sila F., g M.N.Mass. Cloning, production and responses of the sMTL-13 protein (13 kDa lectin secretion) Mycobacterium tuberculosis against Interleukin 6. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2022;23 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d231215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sridhar S., Dash P., Guruprasad K. Comparative analyses of the proteins from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and human genomes: identification of potential tuberculosis drug targets. Gene. 2016;579:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.12.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liang Y., Zhang X., Xiao L., Bai X., Wang X., Yang Y., Zhang J., Song J., Liu Y., Li N., Wu X. Immunogenicity and therapeutic effects of pVAX1-rv1419 DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr. Gene Ther. 2016;16:249–255. doi: 10.2174/1566523216666161102170123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Patra D., Srikalaivani R., Misra A., Singh D.D., Selvaraj M., Vijayan M. Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies of a secreted lectin (Rv1419) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F. Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2010;66:1662–1665. doi: 10.1107/S1744309110042892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Serra D.O., Conover M.S., Arnal L., Sloan G.P., Rodriguez M.E., Yantorno O.M., Deora R. FHA-mediated cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesions are critical for Bordetella pertussis biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces and in the mouse nose and the trachea. PLoS. One. 2011;6:e28811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bansal K., Sinha A.Y., Ghorpade D.S., Togarsimalemath S.K., Patil S.A., Kaveri S.V., Balaji K.N., Bayry J. Src homology 3-interacting domain of Rv1917c of Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces selective maturation of human dendritic cells by regulating PI3K-MAPK-NF-κB signaling and drives Th2 immune responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:36511–36522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.158055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Buist G., Steen A., Kok J., Kuipers O.P. LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;68:838–847. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dreyer A., Röltgen K., Dangy J.P., Ruf M.T., Scherr N., Bolz M., Tobias N.J., Moes C., Vettiger A., Stinear T.P., Pluschke G. Identification of the Mycobacterium ulcerans protein MUL_3720 as a promising target for the development of a diagnostic test for buruli ulcer. PLoS. Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Day C.J., Röltgen K., Pluschke G., Jennings M.P. The cell surface protein MUL_3720 confers binding of the skin pathogen Mycobacterium ulcerans to sulfated glycans and keratin. PLoS. Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.C.J. Day, J. Poole, G. Pluschke, M.P. Jennings, Investigation of Mycobacterium ulcerans glycan interactions using glycan array and surface plasmon resonance, in: 2022: pp. 29–40. 10.1007/978-1-0716-1779-3_4. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 45.Patra D., Sharma A., Chandran D., Vijayan M. Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies of the mannose-binding lectin domain of MSMEG_3662 from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F. Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2011;67:596–599. doi: 10.1107/S1744309111009547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Patra D., Mishra P., Surolia A., Vijayan M. Structure, interactions and evolutionary implications of a domain-swapped lectin dimer from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Glycobiology. 2014;24:956–965. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Song H., Sandie R., Wang Y., Andrade-Navarro M.A., Niederweis M. Identification of outer membrane proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2008;88:526–544. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fullner K.J., Mekalanos J.J. Genetic characterization of a new type IV-A pilus gene cluster found in both classical and El tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:1393–1404. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.3.1393-1404.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ramsugit S., Pillay M. Pili of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: current knowledge and future prospects. Arch. Microbiol. 2015;197:737–744. doi: 10.1007/s00203-015-1117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alteri C.J., Rios-Sarabia N., De la Cruz M.A., González-y-Merchand J.A., Soria-Bustos J., Maldonado-Bernal C., Cedillo M.L., Yáñez-Santos J.A., Martínez-Laguna Y., Torres J., Friedman R.L., Girón J.A., Ares M.A. The Flp type IV pilus operon of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is expressed upon interaction with macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.916247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Farnia P., Zhavnerko G.K., Farnia P., Poleschuyk N.N., Ghanavi J., Velayati A.A. Identification of seven types of pili in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: using atomic force microscopy. Int. J. Mycobacteriology. 2023;12:478–485. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_190_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mea H.J., Yong P.V.C., Wong E.H. An overview of Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis: motility, adherence and biofilm formation. Microbiol. Res. 2021;247 doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tram G., Poole J., Adams F.G., Jennings M.P., Eijkelkamp B.A., Atack J.M. The Acinetobacter baumannii autotransporter adhesin Ata recognizes host glycans as high-affinity receptors. ACS. Infect. Dis. 2021;7:2352–2361. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen C.L., Dudek A., Liang Y.H., Janapatla R.P., Lee H.Y., Hsu L., Kuo H.Y., Chiu C.H. D-mannose-sensitive pilus of Acinetobacter baumannii is linked to biofilm formation and adherence onto respiratory tract epithelial cells. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2022;55:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tamadonfar K.O., Di Venanzio G., Pinkner J.S., Dodson K.W., Kalas V., Zimmerman M.I., Bazan Villicana J., Bowman G.R., Feldman M.F., Hultgren S.J. Structure–function correlates of fibrinogen binding by Acinetobacter adhesins critical in catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212694120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Madar Johansson M., Azzouz M., Häggendal B., Säljö K., Malmi H., Zaviolov A., Teneberg S. Glycosphingolipids recognized by Acinetobacter baumannii. Microorganisms. 2020;8 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pérez A., Merino M., Rumbo-Feal S., Álvarez-Fraga L., Vallejo J.A., Beceiro A., Ohneck E.J., Mateos J., Fernández-Puente P., Actis L.A., Poza M., Bou G. The FhaB/FhaC two-partner secretion system is involved in adhesion of Acinetobacter baumannii AbH12O-A2 strain. Virulence. 2017;8:959–974. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1262313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yu D., Banting G., Neumann N.F. A review of the taxonomy, genetics, and biology of the genus Escherichia and the type species Escherichia coli. Can. J. Microbiol. 2021;67:553–571. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2020-0508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Knight S.D., Bouckaert J. Structure, function, and assembly of type 1 fimbriae. Top. Curr. Chem. 2009;288:67–107. doi: 10.1007/128_2008_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kisiela D.I., Chattopadhyay S., Tchesnokova V., Paul S., Weissman S.J., Medenica I., Clegg S., Sokurenko E.V. Evolutionary analysis points to divergent physiological roles of type 1 fimbriae in Salmonella and Escherichia coli. mBio. 2013;4 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00625-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wu X.R., Sun T.T., Medina J.J. In vitro binding of type 1-fimbriated Escherichia coli to uroplakins Ia and Ib: relation to urinary tract infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. u S. a. 1996;93:9630–9635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Old D.C. Inhibition of the interaction between fimbrial haemagglutinins and erythrocytes by D-mannose and other carbohydrates. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1972;71:149–157. doi: 10.1099/00221287-71-1-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Giampapa C.S., Abraham S.N., Chiang T.M., Beachey E.H. Isolation and characterization of a receptor for type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli from guinea pig erythrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:5362–5367. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2895767 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Connell I., Agace W., Klemm P., Schembri M., Mărild S., Svanborg C. Type 1 fimbrial expression enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinary tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. u S. a. 1996;93:9827–9832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hase K., Kawano K., Nochi T., Pontes G.S., Fukuda S., Ebisawa M., Kadokura K., Tobe T., Fujimura Y., Kawano S., Yabashi A., Waguri S., Nakato G., Kimura S., Murakami T., Iimura M., Hamura K., Fukuoka S.I., Lowe A.W., Itoh K., Kiyono H., Ohno H. Uptake through glycoprotein 2 of FimH+ bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature. 2009;462:226–230. doi: 10.1038/nature08529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Krammer E.M., Bridot C., Serna S., Echeverria B., Semwal S., Roubinet B., van Noort K., Wilbers R.H.P., Bourenkov G., de Ruyck J., Landemarre L., Reichardt N., Bouckaert J. Structural insights into a cooperative switch between one and two FimH bacterial adhesins binding pauci- and high-mannose type N-glycan receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2023;299 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sokurenko E.V., Vogel V., Thomas W.E. Catch-bond mechanism of force-enhanced adhesion: counterintuitive, elusive, but … widespread? Cell Host. Microbe. 2008;4:314–323. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dodson K.W., Pinkner J.S., Rose T., Magnusson G., Hultgren S.J., Waksman G. Structural basis of the interaction of the pyelonephritic E. coli adhesin to its human kidney receptor. Cell. 2001;105:733–743. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00388-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Stapleton A.E., Stroud M.R., Hakomori S.I., Stamm W.E. The globoseries glycosphingolipid sialosyl galactosyl globoside is found in urinary tract tissues and is a preferred binding receptor In vitro for uropathogenic Escherichia coli expressing pap-encoded adhesins. Infect. Immun. 1998;66:3856–3861. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.8.3856-3861.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wurpel D.J., Totsika M., Allsopp L.P., Hartley-Tassell L.E., Day C.J., Peters K.M., Sarkar S., Ulett G.C., Yang J., Tiralongo J., Strugnell R.A., Jennings M.P., Schembri M.A. F9 fimbriae of uropathogenic Escherichia coli are expressed at low temperature and recognise Galβ1-3GlcNAc-containing glycans. PLoS. One. 2014;9:e93177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Conover M.S., Ruer S., Taganna J., Kalas V., De Greve H., Pinkner J.S., Dodson K.W., Remaut H., Hultgren S.J. Inflammation-induced adhesin-receptor interaction provides a fitness advantage to uropathogenic E. coli during chronic infection. Cell Host. Microbe. 2016;20:482–492. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hu J., Li J., Huang X., Xia J., Cui M., Huang Y., Wen Y., Xie Y., Zhao Q., Cao S., Zou L., Han X. Genomic traits of multidrug resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from diarrheic pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1244026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Payne D., O'Reilly M., Williamson D. The K88 fimbrial adhesin of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli binds to beta 1-linked galactosyl residues in glycosphingolipids. Infect. Immun. 1993;61:3673–3677. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.9.3673-3677.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Day C.J., Lo A.W., Hartley-Tassell L.E., Argente M.P., Poole J., King N.P., Tiralongo J., Jennings M.P., Schembri M.A. Discovery of bacterial fimbria–glycan interactions using whole-cell recombinant Escherichia coli expression. mBio. 2021;12 doi: 10.1128/mBio.03664-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lindahl M., Brossmer R., Wadström T. Carbohydrate receptor specificity of K99 fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Glycoconj. J. 1987;4:51–58. doi: 10.1007/BF01048444. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ono E., Abe K., Nakazawa M., Naiki M. Ganglioside epitope recognized by K99 fimbriae from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 1989;57:907–911. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.3.907-911.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lindahl M., Carlstedt I. Binding of K99 fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to pig small intestinal mucin glycopeptides. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1990;136:1609–1614. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-8-1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Buts L., Bouckaert J., De Genst E., Loris R., Oscarson S., Lahmann M., Messens J., Brosens E., Wyns L., De Greve H. The fimbrial adhesin F17-G of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli has an immunoglobulin-like lectin domain that binds N-acetylglucosamine. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;49:705–715. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lonardi E., Moonens K., Buts L., De Boer A., Olsson J., Weiss M., Fabre E., Guérardel Y., Deelder A., Oscarson S., Wuhrer M., Bouckaert J. Structural sampling of glycan interaction profiles reveals mucosal receptors for fimbrial adhesins of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Biology. (Basel) 2013;2:894–917. doi: 10.3390/biology2030894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Madar Johansson M., Coddens A., Benktander J., Cox E., Teneberg S. Porcine intestinal glycosphingolipids recognized by F6-fimbriated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Microb. Pathog. 2014;76:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.von Mentzer A., Tobias J., Wiklund G., Nordqvist S., Aslett M., Dougan G., Sjöling Å., Svennerholm A.M. Identification and characterization of the novel colonization factor CS30 based on whole genome sequencing in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) Sci. Rep. 2017;7:12514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12743-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Von Mentzer A., Zalem D., Chrienova Z., Teneberg S. Colonization factor CS30 from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli binds to sulfatide in human and porcine small intestine. Virulence. 2020;11:381–390. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1749497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Coddens A., Diswall M., Ångström J., Breimer M.E., Goddeeris B., Cox E., Teneberg S. Recognition of blood group ABH type 1 determinants by the FedF qdhesin of F18-fimbriated Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:9713–9726. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807866200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hancock S.J., Lo A.W., Ve T., Day C.J., Tan L., Mendez A.A., Phan M.D., Nhu N.T.K., Peters K.M., Richards A.C., Fleming B.A., Chang C., Ngu D.H.Y., Forde B.M., Haselhorst T., Goh K.G.K., Beatson S.A., Jennings M.P., Mulvey M.A., Kobe B., Schembri M.A. Ucl fimbriae regulation and glycan receptor specificity contribute to gut colonisation by extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS. Pathog. 2022;18 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jansson L., Tobias J., Jarefjäll C., Lebens M., Svennerholm A.M., Teneberg S. Sulfatide recognition by colonization factor antigen CS6 from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. PLoS. One. 2009;4:e4487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Prasadarao N.V., Wass C.A., Hacker J., Jann K., Kim K.S. Adhesion of S-fimbriated Escherichia coli to brain glycolipids mediated by sfaA gene-encoded protein of S-fimbriae. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:10356–10363. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82209-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Prasadarao N.V., Wass C.A., Kim K.S. Identification and characterization of S fimbria-binding sialoglycoproteins on brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 1997;65:2852–2860. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.7.2852-2860.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Khan A.S., Kniep B., Oelschlaeger T.A., Van Die I., Korhonen T., Hacker J. Receptor structure for F1C fimbriae of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2000;68:3541–3547. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3541-3547.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Castelain M., Ehlers S., Klinth J., Lindberg S., Andersson M., Uhlin B.E., Axner O. Fast uncoiling kinetics of F1C pili expressed by uropathogenic Escherichia coli are revealed on a single pilus level using force-measuring optical tweezers. Eur. Biophys. J. 2011;40:305–316. doi: 10.1007/s00249-010-0648-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jansson L., Tobias J., Lebens M., Svennerholm A.M., Teneberg S. The major subunit, CfaB, of colonization factor antigen I from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is a glycosphingolipid binding protein. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:3488–3497. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02006-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Little J.I., Singh P.K., Zhao J., Dunn S., Matz H., Donnenberg M.S. Type IV pili of Enterobacteriaceae species. EcoSal. Plus. 2024 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0003-2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Humphries R.M., Griener T.P., Vogt S.L., Mulvey G.L., Raivio T., Donnenberg M.S., Kitov P.I., Surette M., Armstrong G.D. N-acetyllactosamine-induced retraction of bundle-forming pili regulates virulence-associated gene expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;76:1111–1126. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07192.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hyland R.M., Sun J., Griener T.P., Mulvey G.L., Klassen J.S., Donnenberg M.S., Armstrong G.D. The bundlin pilin protein of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is an N-acetyllactosamine-specific lectin. Cell Microbiol. 2007 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01028.x. 070816152918004-??? [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Werneburg G.T., Thanassi D.G. Pili assembled by the chaperone/usher pathway in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. EcoSal. Plus. 2018;8 doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0007-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ye J., Song L., Liu Y., Pan Q., Zhong X., Li S., Shang Y., Tian Y., He Y., Chen L., Chen W., Peng Z., Wang R. Core 2 mucin-type O-Glycan is related to EPEC and EHEC O157:H7 adherence to human colon carcinoma HT-29 epithelial cells. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2015;60:1977–1990. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3548-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Al-Saedi F., Vaz D.P., Stones D.H., Krachler A.M. 3-sulfogalactosyl–dependent adhesion of Escherichia coli HS multivalent adhesion molecule is attenuated by sulfatase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:19792–19803. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.817908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Roy K., Hilliard G.M., Hamilton D.J., Luo J., Ostmann M.M., Fleckenstein J.M. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli EtpA mediates adhesion between flagella and host cells. Nature. 2009;457:594–598. doi: 10.1038/nature07568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kumar P., Kuhlmann F.M., Bhullar K., Yang H., Vallance B.A., Xia L., Luo Q., Fleckenstein J.M. Dynamic interactions of a conserved enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli adhesin with intestinal mucins govern epithelium engagement and toxin delivery. Infect. Immun. 2016;84:3608–3617. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00692-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kumar P., Kuhlmann F.M., Chakraborty S., Bourgeois A.L., Foulke-Abel J., Tumala B., Vickers T.J., Sack D.A., DeNearing B., Harro C.D., Wright W.S., Gildersleeve J.C., Ciorba M.A., Santhanam S., Porter C.K., Gutierrez R.L., Prouty M.G., Riddle M.S., Polino A., Sheikh A., Donowitz M., Fleckenstein J.M. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli–blood group A interactions intensify diarrheal severity. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:3298–3311. doi: 10.1172/JCI97659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Adeolu M., Alnajar S., Naushad S., Gupta R.S. Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the ‘Enterobacteriales’: proposal for enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morgane. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016;66:5575–5599. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Girlich D., Bonnin R.A., Dortet L., Naas T. Genetics of acquired antibiotic resistance genes in Proteus spp. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kuan L., Schaffer J.N., Zouzias C.D., Pearson M.M. Characterization of 17 chaperone-usher fimbriae encoded by Proteus mirabilis reveals strong conservation. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;63:911–922. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.069971-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Jiang W., Ubhayasekera W., Breed M.C., Norsworthy A.N., Serr N., Mobley H.L.T., Pearson M.M., Knight S.D. MrpH, a new class of metal-binding adhesin, requires zinc to mediate biofilm formation. PLoS. Pathog. 2020;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wurpel D.J., Totsika M., Allsopp L.P., Webb R.I., Moriel D.G., Schembri M.A. Comparative proteomics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli during growth in human urine identify UCA-like (UCL) fimbriae as an adherence factor involved in biofilm formation and binding to uroepithelial cells. J. Proteomics. 2016;131:177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dong N., Yang X., Chan E.W.C., Zhang R., Chen S. Klebsiella species: taxonomy, hypervirulence and multidrug resistance. EBioMedicine. 2022;79 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lopatto E.D.B., Pinkner J.S., Sanick D.A., Potter R.F., Liu L.X., Bazán Villicaña J., Tamadonfar K.O., Ye Y., Zimmerman M.I., Gualberto N.C., Dodson K.W., Janetka J.W., Hunstad D.A., Hultgren S.J. Conformational ensembles in Klebsiella pneumoniae FimH impact uropathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2024;121 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2409655121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Stahlhut S.G., Chattopadhyay S., Kisiela D.I., Hvidtfeldt K., Clegg S., Struve C., Sokurenko E.V., Krogfelt K.A. Structural and population characterization of MrkD, the adhesive subunit of Type 3 fimbriae. J. Bacteriol. 2013;195:5602–5613. doi: 10.1128/JB.00753-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sebghati T.A.S., Korhonen T.K., Hornick D.B., Clegg S. Characterization of the Type 3 Fimbrial adhesins of Klebsiella strains. Infect. Immun. 1998;66:2887–2894. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2887-2894.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Stahlhut S.G., Struve C., Krogfelt K.A. Klebsiella pneumoniae type 3 fimbriae agglutinate yeast in a mannose-resistant manner. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012;61:317–322. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.036350-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Guo Y., Kitamoto S., Caballero-Flores G., Kim Y., Watanabe D., Sugihara K., Núñez G., Alteri C.J., Inohara N., Kamada N. Oral pathobiont Klebsiella chaperon usher pili provide site-specific adaptation for the inflamed gut mucosa. Gut. Microbes. 2024;16 doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2333463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Davin-Regli A., Lavigne J.P., Pagès J.M. Enterobacter spp.: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019;32 doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pan Y.T., Xu B., Rice K., Smith S., Jackson R., Elbein A.D. Specificity of the high-mannose recognition site between Enterobacter cloacae pili adhesin and HT-29 cell membranes. Infect. Immun. 1997;65:4199–4206. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.10.4199-4206.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ghonaim M., Elkhyat A., El-Hefnawy S., Hossam Eldeen E. FimH adhesin among Enterobacter spp. isolates and its relation to biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance pattern, Egypt. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018;27:45–54. doi: 10.21608/ejmm.2018.285640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Pan F., Wang C., Yang Y., Guo Y., Zhu D., Zhang H., Jiang X., Xu Y., Zhang X., Zhang Z., Ji P., Kang M., He C., Wang C., He L., Xu Y., Huang Y., Chen Z., Sun Z., Ni Y., Sun J., Chu Y., Tian S., Hu Z., Li J., Yu Y., Lin J., Shan B., Du Y., Guo S., Wang Y., Wei L., Wang X., Zhuo C., Su D., Wang R., Fang H., Yu B., Gong P., Song M., Guo D., Zhao J., Liu W., Li Y., Jin Y., Wang Y., Weng K., Zhang Y., Xu X., Yan C., Huang X., Yu H., Li Y., Wang S., Zhang L., Ma J., Zhou S., Ke J., Zhu L., Meng J., Shen H., Zhou W., Li G., Jia W., Wu J., Lu Y., Li J., Liu J., Liao L., Gu H., Jiang L., He W., Xue S., Feng J., Dou R., Yue C., Guo R., Jin Y., Ma X., Zheng Y., Hu F., Chen Y., Meng Q. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacterales isolated from children: data from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) from 2015–2021. One Heal. Adv. 2024;2:21. doi: 10.1186/s44280-024-00054-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Qin S., Xiao W., Zhou C., Pu Q., Deng X., Lan L., Liang H., Song X., Wu M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:199. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01056-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sanchez H., Hopkins D., Demirdjian S., Gutierrez C., O'Toole G.A., Neelamegham S., Berwin B. Identification of cell-surface glycans that mediate motility-dependent binding and internalization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by phagocytes. Mol. Immunol. 2021;131:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Bucior I., Mostov K., Engel J.N. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-mediated damage requires distinct receptors at the apical and basolateral surfaces of the polarized epithelium. Infect. Immun. 2010;78:939–953. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01215-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Rosenstein I.J., Yuen C.T., Stoll M.S., Feizi T. Differences in the binding specificities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa M35 and Escherichia coli C600 for lipid-linked oligosaccharides with lactose-related core regions. Infect. Immun. 1992;60:5078–5084. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.12.5078-5084.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Ovchinnikova E.S., Krom B.P., Harapanahalli A.K., Busscher H.J., van der Mei H.C. Surface thermodynamic and adhesion force evaluation of the role of chitin-binding protein in the physical interaction between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. Langmuir. 2013;29:4823–4829. doi: 10.1021/la400554g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Vishwanath S., Ramphal R. Tracheobronchial mucin receptor for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: predominance of amino sugars in binding sites. Infect. Immun. 1985;48:331–335. doi: 10.1128/iai.48.2.331-335.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wheeler K.M., Cárcamo-Oyarce G., Turner B.S., Dellos-Nolan S., Co J.Y., Lehoux S., Cummings R.D., Wozniak D.J., Ribbeck K. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:2146–2154. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0581-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wang B.X., Wheeler K.M., Cady K.C., Lehoux S., Cummings R.D., Laub M.T., Ribbeck K. Mucin glycans signal through the sensor kinase RetS to inhibit virulence-associated traits in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr. Biol. 2021;31:90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.088. e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Feldman M., Bryan R., Rajan S., Scheffler L., Brunnert S., Tang H., Prince A. Role of flagella in pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infection. Infect. Immun. 1998;66:43–51. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.1.43-51.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Xia B., Sachdev G.P., Cummings R.D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa mucoid strain 8830 binds glycans containing the sialyl-Lewis x epitope. Glycoconj. J. 2007;24:87–95. doi: 10.1007/s10719-006-9015-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Krivan H.C., Roberts D.D., Ginsburg V. Many pulmonary pathogenic bacteria bind specifically to the carbohydrate sequence GalNAc 1-4Gal found in some glycolipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1988;85:6157–6161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Scharfman A., Arora S.K., Delmotte P., Van Brussel E., Mazurier J., Ramphal R., Roussel P. Recognition of lewis x derivatives present on mucins by flagellar components of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:5243–5248. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5243-5248.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Bucior I., Pielage J.F., Engel J.N. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pili and flagella mediate distinct binding and signaling events at the apical and basolateral surface of airway epithelium. PLoS. Pathog. 2012;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sheth H.B., Lee K.K., Wong W.Y., Srivastava G., Hindsgaul O., Hodges R.S., Paranchych W., Irvin R.T. The pili of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains PAK and PAO bind specifically to the carbohydrate sequence beta GalNAc(1-4)beta Gal found in glycosphingolipids asialo-GM1 and asialo-GM2. Mol. Microbiol. 1994;11:715–723. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Ramphal R., Carnoy C., Fievre S., Michalski J.C., Houdret N., Lamblin G., Strecker G., Roussel P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa recognizes carbohydrate chains containing type 1 (Gal beta 1-3GlcNAc) or type 2 (Gal beta 1-4GlcNAc) disaccharide units. Infect. Immun. 1991;59:700–704. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.2.700-704.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Sanchez H., O'Toole G.A., Berwin B. Assessment of the glycan-binding profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023;11 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01667-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gilboa-Garber N. Methods Enzymol. 1982. [32]Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectins; pp. 378–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Blanchard B., Nurisso A., Hollville E., Tétaud C., Wiels J., Pokorná M., Wimmerová M., Varrot A., Imberty A. Structural basis of the preferential binding for globo-series glycosphingolipids displayed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin I. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;383:837–853. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Eierhoff T., Bastian B., Thuenauer R., Madl J., Audfray A., Aigal S., Juillot S., Rydell G.E., Muller S., de Bentzmann S., Imberty A., Fleck C., Romer W. A lipid zipper triggers bacterial invasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:12895–12900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402637111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Zhou X., Willems R.J.L., Friedrich A.W., Rossen J.W.A., Bathoorn E. Enterococcus faecium: from microbiological insights to practical recommendations for infection control and diagnostics. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2020;9:130. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00770-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Foster T.J. The MSCRAMM family of cell-wall-anchored surface proteins of gram-positive cocci. Trends. Microbiol. 2019;27:927–941. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Sillanpää J., Nallapareddy S.R., Prakash V.P., Qin X., Höök M., Weinstock G.M., Murray B.E. Identification and phenotypic characterization of a second collagen adhesin, Scm, and genome-based identification and analysis of 13 other predicted MSCRAMMs, including four distinct pilus loci, in Enterococcus faecium. Microbiology (N. Y) 2008;154:3199–3211. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/017319-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Nallapareddy S.R., Weinstock G.M., Murray B.E. Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium exhibit strain-specific collagen binding mediated by Acm, a new member of the MSCRAMM family. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;47:1733–1747. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Nallapareddy S.R., Singh K.V., Okhuysen P.C., Murray B.E. A functional collagen adhesin gene, acm, in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium correlates with the recent success of this emerging nosocomial pathogen. Infect. Immun. 2008;76:4110–4119. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00375-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hendrickx A.P.A., van Luit-Asbroek M., Schapendonk C.M.E., van Wamel W.J.B., Braat J.C., Wijnands L.M., Bonten M.J.M., Willems R.J.L. SgrA, a nidogen-binding LPXTG surface adhesin implicated in biofilm formation, and EcbA, a collagen binding MSCRAMM, are two novel adhesins of hospital-acquired Enterococcus faecium. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:5097–5106. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00275-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Tytgat H.L.P., Douillard F.P., Reunanen J., Rasinkangas P., Hendrickx A.P.A., Laine P.K., Paulin L., Satokari R., de Vos W.M. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG outcompetes Enterococcus faecium via mucus-binding pili: evidence for a novel and heterospecific probiotic mechanism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:5756–5762. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01243-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Kant A., Palva A., von Ossowski I., Krishnan V. Crystal structure of lactobacillar SpaC reveals an atypical five-domain pilus tip adhesin: exposing its substrate-binding and assembly in SpaCBA pili. J. Struct. Biol. 2020;211 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Maresca M., Alatou R., Pujol A., Nicoletti C., Perrier J., Giardina T., Simon G., Méjean V., Fons M. RadA, a MSCRAMM adhesin of the dominant symbiote Ruminococcus gnavus E1, binds human immunoglobulins and intestinal mucins. Biomolecules. 2021;11 doi: 10.3390/biom11111613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Cheung G.Y.C., Bae J.S., Otto M. Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence. 2021;12:547–569. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Pietrocola G., Nobile G., Gianotti V., Zapotoczna M., Foster T.J., Geoghegan J.A., Speziale P. Molecular interactions of human plasminogen with fibronectin-binding protein B (FnBPB), a fibrinogen/fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:18148–18162. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.731125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Viljoen A., Viela F., Mathelié-Guinlet M., Missiakas D., Pietrocola G., Speziale P., Dufrêne Y.F. Staphylococcus aureus vWF-binding protein triggers a strong interaction between clumping factor A and host vWF. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:453. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01986-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Herman-Bausier P., Labate C., Towell A.M., Derclaye S., Geoghegan J.A., Dufrêne Y.F. Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A is a force-sensitive molecular switch that activates bacterial adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. u S. a. 2018;115:5564–5569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718104115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Bhattacharya M., Spencer B.L., Kwiecinski J.M., Podkowik M., Putzel G., Pironti A., Shopsin B., Doran K.S., Horswill A.R. Collagen binding adhesin restricts Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. BioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.11.01.621145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Mills K.B., Maciag J.J., Wang C., Crawford J.A., Enroth T.J., Keim K.C., Dufrêne Y.F., Robinson D.A., Fey P.D., Herr A.B., Horswill A.R. Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization is mediated by SasG lectin variation. Cell Rep. 2024;43 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Clark L.C., Atkin K.E., Whelan F., Brentnall A.S., Harris G., Towell A.M., Turkenburg J.P., Liu Y., Feizi T., Griffiths S.C., Geoghegan J.A., Potts J.R. Staphylococcal Periscope proteins Aap, SasG, and Pls project noncanonical legume-like lectin adhesin domains from the bacterial surface. J. Biol. Chem. 2023;299 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Yang Y.H., Jiang Y.L., Zhang J., Wang L., Bai X.H., Zhang S.J., Ren Y.M., Li N., Zhang Y.H., Zhang Z., Gong Q., Mei Y., Xue T., Zhang J.R., Chen Y., Zhou C.Z. Structural insights into SraP-mediated Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to host cells. PLoS. Pathog. 2014;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Shi H., Tang J., An C., Yang L., Zhou X. Protein A of Staphylococcus aureus strain NCTC8325 interacted with heparin. Arch. Microbiol. 2021;203:2563–2573. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Mishra S., Horswill A.R. Heparin mimics extracellular DNA in binding to cell surface-localized proteins and promoting Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. mSphere. 2017;2 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00135-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Sudha P.S., Devaraj H., Devaraj N. Adherence of Shigella dysenteriae 1 to human colonic mucin. Curr. Microbiol. 2001;42:381–387. doi: 10.1007/s002840010234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Belotserkovsky I., Brunner K., Pinaud L., Rouvinski A., Dellarole M., Baron B., Dubey G., Samassa F., Parsot C., Sansonetti P., Phalipon A. Glycan-Glycan Interaction Determines Shigella Tropism toward Human T Lymphocytes. mBio. 2018;9:1–10. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02309-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Day C.J., Tran E.N., Semchenko E.A., Tram G., Hartley-Tassell L.E., Ng P.S.K., King R.M., Ulanovsky R., McAtamney S., Apicella M.A., Tiralongo J., Morona R., Korolik V., Jennings M.P. Glycan:glycan interactions: high affinity biomolecular interactions that can mediate binding of pathogenic bacteria to host cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015;112 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421082112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Tran E.N.H., Day C.J., McCartney E., Poole J., Tse E., Jennings M.P., Morona R. Shigella flexneri targets human colonic goblet cells by O antigen binding to sialyl-Tn and Tn antigens via glycan–glycan interactions. ACS. Infect. Dis. 2020;6:2604–2615. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Snellings N.J., Tall B.D., Venkatesan M.M. Characterization of Shigella type 1 fimbriae: expression, FimA sequence, and phase variation. Infect. Immun. 1997;65:2462–2467. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.6.2462-2467.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Nasser A., Mosadegh M., Azimi T., Shariati A. Molecular mechanisms of Shigella effector proteins: a common pathogen among diarrheic pediatric population. Mol. Cell Pediatr. 2022;9:12. doi: 10.1186/s40348-022-00145-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Skoudy A., Mounier J., Aruffo A., Ohayon H., Gounon P., Sansonetti P., Tran Van Nhieu G. CD44 binds to the Shigella IpaB protein and participates in bacterial invasion of epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2000;2:19–33. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2000.00028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Watarai M., Funato S., Sasakawa C. Interaction of Ipa proteins of Shigella flexneri with alpha5beta1 integrin promotes entry of the bacteria into mammalian cells. J. Exp. Med. 1996;183:991–999. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.3.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Qin J., Doyle M.T., Tran E.N.H., Morona R. The virulence domain of Shigella IcsA contains a subregion with specific host cell adhesion function. PLoS. One. 2020;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.León Y., Honigsberg R., Rasko D.A., Faherty C.S. Gastrointestinal signals in supplemented media reveal a role in adherence for the Shigella flexneri sap autotransporter gene. Gut. Microbes. 2024;16 doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2331985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Faherty C.S., Redman J.C., Rasko D.A., Barry E.M., Nataro J.P. Shigella flexneri effectors OspE1 and OspE2 mediate induced adherence to the colonic epithelium following bile salts exposure. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;85:107–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08092.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Popa G.L., Papa M.I. Salmonella spp. infection - a continuous threat worldwide. Germs. 2021;11:88–96. doi: 10.18683/germs.2021.1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Giannasca K.T., Giannasca P.J., Neutra M.R. Adherence of Salmonella Typhimurium to Caco-2 cells: identification of a glycoconjugate receptor. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:135–145. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.1.135-145.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Rausch P., Steck N., Suwandi A., Seidel J.A., Künzel S., Bhullar K., Basic M., Bleich A., Johnsen J.M., Vallance B.A., Baines J.F., Grassl G.A. Expression of the blood-group-related gene B4galnt2 alters susceptibility to Salmonella infection. PLoS. Pathog. 2015;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Crichton P.B., Yakubu D.E., Old D.C., Clegg S. Immunological and genetical relatedness of type-1 and type-2 fimbriae in salmonellas of serotypes Gallinarum, Pullorum and Typhimurium. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1989;67:283–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb02497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Kisiela D., Sapeta A., Kuczkowski M., Stefaniak T., Wieliczko A., Ugorski M. Characterization of FimH adhesins expressed by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Gallinarum and Pullorum: reconstitution of mannose-binding properties by single amino acid substitution. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:6187–6190. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.9.6187-6190.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Yue M., Han X., De Masi L., Zhu C., Ma X., Zhang J., Wu R., Schmieder R., Kaushik R.S., Fraser G.P., Zhao S., McDermott P.F., Weill F.X., Mainil J.G., Arze C., Fricke W.F., Edwards R.A., Brisson D., Zhang N.R., Rankin S.C., Schifferli D.M. Allelic variation contributes to bacterial host specificity. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8754. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Thankavel K., Shah A.H., Cohen M.S., Ikeda T., Lorenz R.G., Curtiss R., Abraham S.N. Molecular basis for the enterocyte tropism exhibited by Salmonella Typhimurium type 1 fimbriae. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:5797–5809. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Suwandi A., Galeev A., Riedel R., Sharma S., Seeger K., Sterzenbach T., García Pastor L., Boyle E.C., Gal-Mor O., Hensel M., Casadesús J., Baines J.F., Grassl G.A. Std fimbriae-fucose interaction increases Salmonella-induced intestinal inflammation and prolongs colonization. PLoS. Pathog. 2019;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Chessa D., Winter M.G., Jakomin M., Bäumler A.J. Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium Std fimbriae bind terminal α(1,2)fucose residues in the cecal mucosa. Mol. Microbiol. 2009;71:864–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06566.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Deatherage Kaiser B.L., Li J., Sanford J.A., Kim Y.M., Kronewitter S.R., Jones M.B., Peterson C.T., Peterson S.N., Frank B.C., Purvine S.O., Brown J.N., Metz T.O., Smith R.D., Heffron F., Adkins J.N. A multi-omic view of host-pathogen-commensal interplay in Salmonella-mediated intestinal infection. PLoS. One. 2013;8:e67155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Ng K.M., Ferreyra J.A., Higginbottom S.K., Lynch J.B., Kashyap P.C., Gopinath S., Naidu N., Choudhury B., Weimer B.C., Monack D.M., Sonnenburg J.L. Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens. Nature. 2013;502:96–99. doi: 10.1038/nature12503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Chessa D., Dorsey C.W., Winter M., Bäumler A.J. Binding specificity of Salmonella plasmid-encoded fimbriae assessed by glycomics. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:8118–8124. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M710095200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Hurtado-Escobar G.A., Grépinet O., Raymond P., Abed N., Velge P., Virlogeux-Payant I. H-NS is the major repressor of Salmonella Typhimurium Pef fimbriae expression. Virulence. 2019;10:849–867. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1682752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Unemo M., Lahra M.M., Escher M., Eremin S., Cole M.J., Galarza P., Ndowa F., Martin I., Dillon J.A.R., Galas M., Ramon-Pardo P., Weinstock H., Wi T. WHO global antimicrobial resistance surveillance for Neisseria gonorrhoeae 2017–18: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2:e627–e636. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00171-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Caugant D.A., Brynildsrud O.B. Neisseria meningitidis: using genomics to understand diversity, evolution and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;18:84–96. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0282-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Scarselli M., Serruto D., Montanari P., Capecchi B., Adu-Bobie J., Veggi D., Rappuoli R., Pizza M., Aricò B. Neisseria meningitidis NhhA is a multifunctional trimeric autotransporter adhesin. Mol. Microbiol. 2006;61:631–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Serruto D., Spadafina T., Ciucchi L., Lewis L.A., Ram S., Tontini M., Santini L., Biolchi A., Seib K.L., Giuliani M.M., Donnelly J.J., Berti F., Savino S., Scarselli M., Costantino P., Kroll J.S., O'Dwyer C., Qiu J., Plaut A.G., Moxon R., Rappuoli R., Pizza M., Aricò B. Neisseria meningitidis GNA2132, a heparin-binding protein that induces protective immunity in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:3770–3775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915162107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Vacca I., Del Tordello E., Gasperini G., Pezzicoli A., Di Fede M., Rossi Paccani S., Marchi S., Mubaiwa T.D., Hartley-Tassell L.E., Jennings M.P., Seib K.L., Masignani V., Pizza M., Serruto D., Aricò B., Delany I. Neisserial Heparin Binding Antigen (NHBA) contributes to the adhesion of Neisseria meningitidis to human epithelial cells. PLoS. One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Semchenko E.A., Mubaiwa T.D., Day C.J., Seib K.L. Role of the gonococcal Neisserial heparin binding antigen in microcolony formation, and serum resistance and adherence to epithelial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;221:1612–1622. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Le Guennec L., Virion Z., Bouzinba-Ségard H., Robbe-Masselot C., Léonard R., Nassif X., Bourdoulous S., Coureuil M. Receptor recognition by meningococcal type IV pili relies on a specific complex N -glycan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020;117:2606–2612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919567117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Rudel T., Scheuerpflug I., Meyer T.F. Neisseria PilC protein identified as type-4 pilus tip-located adhesin. Nature. 1995;373:357–359. doi: 10.1038/373357a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Chen T., Belland R.J., Wilson J., Swanson J. Adherence of pilus- Opa+ gonococci to epithelial cells in vitro involves heparan sulfate. J. Exp. Med. 1995;182:511–517. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.van Putten J.P., Paul S.M. Binding of syndecan-like cell surface proteoglycan receptors is required for Neisseria gonorrhoeae entry into human mucosal cells. EMBO J. 1995;14:2144–2154. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07208.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Freissler E., Meyer auf der Heyde A., David G., Meyer T.F., Dehio C. Syndecan-1 and syndecan-4 can mediate the invasion of OpaHSPG-expressing Neisseria gonorrhoeae into epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2000;2:69–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2000.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Aquino R.S., Teng Y.H.F., Park P.W. Glycobiology of syndecan-1 in bacterial infections. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018;46:371–377. doi: 10.1042/BST20170395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.McGuire E., Li A., Collin S.M., Decraene V., Cook M., Padfield S., Sriskandan S., Van Beneden C., Lamagni T., Brown C.S. Time to negative throat culture following initiation of antibiotics for pharyngeal group A Streptococcus: a systematic review and meta-analysis up to October 2021 to inform public health control measures. Eurosurveillance. 2023;28 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.15.2200573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Raabe V.N., Shane A.L. Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) Microbiol. Spectr. 2019;7 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0007-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Johnston C., Campo N., Bergé M.J., Polard P., Claverys J.P. Streptococcus pneumoniae, le transformiste. Trends. Microbiol. 2014;22:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Ryan P.A., Pancholi V., Fischetti V.A. Group A Streptococci bind to mucin and human pharyngeal cells through sialic acid-containing receptors. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:7402–7412. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7402-7412.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Lancefield R.C. The antigenic complex of Streptococcus haemolyticus : I. Demonstration of a type-specific substance in extracts of Streptococcus haemolyticus. J. Exp. Med. 1928;47:91–103. doi: 10.1084/jem.47.1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Facklam R., Beall B., Efstratiou A., Fischetti V., Johnson D., Kaplan E., Kriz P., Lovgren M., Martin D., Schwartz B., Totolian A., Bessen D., Hollingshead S., Rubin F., Scott J., Tyrrell G. emm typing and validation of provisional M types for group A streptococci1. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999;5:247–253. doi: 10.3201/eid0502.990209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Indraratna A.D., Everest-Dass A., Skropeta D., Sanderson-Smith M. The exploitation of human glycans by Group A Streptococcus. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022;46 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuac001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.De Oliveira D.M.P., Hartley-Tassell L., Everest-Dass A., Day C.J., Dabbs R.A., Ve T., Kobe B., Nizet V., Packer N.H., Walker M.J., Jennings M.P., Sanderson-Smith M.L. Blood group antigen recognition via the group A streptococcal M protein mediates host colonization. mBio. 2017;8 doi: 10.1128/mBio.02237-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.De Oliveira D.M.P., Everest-Dass A., Hartley-Tassell L., Day C.J., Indraratna A., Brouwer S., Cleary A., Kautto L., Gorman J., Packer N.H., Jennings M.P., Walker M.J., Sanderson-Smith M.L. Human glycan expression patterns influence Group A streptococcal colonization of epithelial cells. FASEB J. 2019;33:10808–10818. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900559R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Chang Y.C., Wang Z., Flax L.A., Xu D., Esko J.D., Nizet V., Baron M.J. Glycosaminoglycan binding facilitates entry of a bacterial pathogen into central nervous systems. PLoS. Pathog. 2011;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Weiser J.N., Ferreira D.M., Paton J.C. Streptococcus pneumoniae: transmission, colonization and invasion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018;16:355–367. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0001-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Andersson B., Dahmén J., Frejd T., Leffler H., Magnusson G., Noori G., Edén C.S. Identification of an active disaccharide unit of a glycoconjugate receptor for pneumococci attaching to human pharyngeal epithelial cells. J. Exp. Med. 1983;158:559–570. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.2.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Limoli D.H., Sladek J.A., Fuller L.A., Singh A.K., King S.J. BgaA acts as an adhesin to mediate attachment of some pneumococcal strains to human epithelial cells. Microbiology (N. Y) 2011;157:2369–2381. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.045609-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Lammerts van Bueren A., Finn R., Ausió J., Boraston A.B. α-Glucan recognition by a new family of carbohydrate-binding modules found primarily in bacterial pathogens. Biochemistry. 2004;43:15633–15642. doi: 10.1021/bi048215z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.van Bueren A.L., Higgins M., Wang D., Burke R.D., Boraston A.B. Identification and structural basis of binding to host lung glycogen by streptococcal virulence factors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007;14:76–84. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Lammerts van Bueren A., Ficko-Blean E., Pluvinage B., Hehemann J.H., Higgins M.A., Deng L., Ogunniyi A.D., Stroeher U.H., El Warry N., Burke R.D., Czjzek M., Paton J.C., Vocadlo D.J., Boraston A.B. The conformation and function of a multimodular glycogen-degrading pneumococcal virulence factor. Structure. 2011;19:640–651. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Hytönen J., Haataja S., Gerlach D., Podbielski A., Finne J. The SpeB virulence factor of Streptococcus pyogenes, a multifunctional secreted and cell surface molecule with strepadhesin, laminin-binding and cysteine protease activity. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;39:512–519. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Blöchl C., Holzner C., Luciano M., Bauer R., Horejs-Hoeck J., Eckhard U., Brandstetter H., Huber C.G. Proteolytic profiling of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B (SpeB) by complementary HPLC-MS approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;23:412. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Talay S.R., Valentin-Weigand P., Jerlström P.G., Timmis K.N., Chhatwal G.S. Fibronectin-binding protein of Streptococcus pyogenes: sequence of the binding domain involved in adherence of streptococci to epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 1992;60:3837–3844. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.9.3837-3844.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Spellerberg B., Rozdzinski E., Martin S., Weber-Heynemann J., Schnitzler N., Lütticken R., Podbielski A. Lmb, a protein with similarities to the LraI adhesin family, mediates attachment of Streptococcus agalactiae to human laminin. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:871–878. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.2.871-878.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Seo H.S., Minasov G., Seepersaud R., Doran K.S., Dubrovska I., Shuvalova L., Anderson W.F., Iverson T.M., Sullam P.M. Characterization of fibrinogen binding by glycoproteins Srr1 and Srr2 of Streptococcus agalactiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:35982–35996. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.513358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Buscetta M., Papasergi S., Firon A., Pietrocola G., Biondo C., Mancuso G., Midiri A., Romeo L., Teti G., Speziale P., Trieu-Cuot P., Beninati C. FbsC, a novel fibrinogen-binding protein, promotes Streptococcus agalactiae-host cell interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:21003–21015. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.553073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Izoré T., Contreras-Martel C., El Mortaji L., Manzano C., Terrasse R., Vernet T., Di Guilmi A.M., Dessen A. Structural basis of host cell recognition by the pilus adhesin from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Structure. 2010;18:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Barocchi M.A., Ries J., Zogaj X., Hemsley C., Albiger B., Kanth A., Dahlberg S., Fernebro J., Moschioni M., Masignani V., Hultenby K., Taddei A.R., Beiter K., Wartha F., von Euler A., Covacci A., Holden D.W., Normark S., Rappuoli R., Henriques-Normark B. A pneumococcal pilus influences virulence and host inflammatory responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103:2857–2862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511017103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Roos S., Jonsson H. A high-molecular-mass cell-surface protein from Lactobacillus reuteri 1063 adheres to mucus components. Microbiology (N. Y) 2002;148:433–442. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Du Y., He Y.X., Zhang Z.Y., Yang Y.H., Shi W.W., Frolet C., Di Guilmi A.M., Vernet T., Zhou C.Z., Chen Y. Crystal structure of the mucin-binding domain of Spr1345 from Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Struct. Biol. 2011;174:252–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Juge N. Microbial adhesins to gastrointestinal mucus. Trends. Microbiol. 2012;20:30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Shahin M., Sheppard D., Raynaud C., Berry J.L., Gurung I., Silva L.M., Feizi T., Liu Y., Pelicic V. Characterization of a glycan-binding complex of minor pilins completes the analysis of Streptococcus sanguinis type 4 pili subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2023;120 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216237120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Deng L., Bensing B.A., Thamadilok S., Yu H., Lau K., Chen X., Ruhl S., Sullam P.M., Varki A. Oral streptococci utilize a siglec-like domain of serine-rich repeat adhesins to preferentially target platelet sialoglycans in human blood. PLoS. Pathog. 2014;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Van Eldere J., Slack M.P.E., Ladhani S., Cripps A.W. Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, an under-recognised pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14:1281–1292. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70734-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Atack J.M., Day C.J., Poole J., Brockman K.L., Timms J.R.L., Winter L.E., Haselhorst T., Bakaletz L.O., Barenkamp S.J., Jennings M.P. The nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae major adhesin Hia is a dual-function lectin that binds to human-specific respiratory tract sialic acid glycan receptors. mBio. 2020;11 doi: 10.1128/mBio.02714-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.St Geme J.W. The HMW1 adhesin of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae recognizes sialylated glycoprotein receptors on cultured human epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 1994;62:3881–3889. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.9.3881-3889.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Atack J.M., Day C.J., Poole J., Brockman K.L., Bakaletz L.O., Barenkamp S.J., Jennings M.P. The HMW2 adhesin of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae is a human-adapted lectin that mediates high-affinity binding to 2–6 linked N-acetylneuraminic acid glycans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:1103–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Reddy M.S., Bernstein J.M., Murphy T.F., Faden H.S. Binding between outer membrane proteins of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and human nasopharyngeal mucin. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:1477–1479. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.4.1477-1479.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Spahich N.A., Kenjale R., McCann J., Meng G., Ohashi T., Erickson H.P., St. Geme J.W. Structural determinants of the interaction between the Haemophilus influenzae Hap autotransporter and fibronectin. Microbiology (N. Y) 2014;160:1182–1190. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.077784-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Kubiet M., Ramphal R., Weber A., Smith A. Pilus-mediated adherence of Haemophilus influenzae to human respiratory mucins. Infect. Immun. 2000;68:3362–3367. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3362-3367.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Fink D.L., Green B.A., St. Geme J.W. The Haemophilus influenzae Hap autotransporter binds to fibronectin, laminin, and collagen IV. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:4902–4907. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4902-4907.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Garai P., Atack J.M., Wills B.M., Jennings M.P., Bakaletz L.O., Brockman K.L. Adherence of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae to cells and substrates of the airway is differentially regulated by individual ModA phase varions. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023;11 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04093-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Matos R., Amorim I., Magalhães A., Haesebrouck F., Gärtner F., Reis C.A. Adhesion of Helicobacter species to the human gastric mucosa: a deep look into glycans role. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.656439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Oleastro M., Ménard A. The role of Helicobacter pylori outer membrane proteins in adherence and pathogenesis. Biology. (Basel) 2013;2:1110–1134. doi: 10.3390/biology2031110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Borén T., Falk P., Roth K.A., Larson G., Normark S. Attachment of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric epithelium mediated by blood group antigens. Science (80-.) 1993;262:1892–1895. doi: 10.1126/science.8018146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Aspholm-Hurtig M., Dailide G., Lahmann M., Kalia A., Ilver D., Roche N., Vikström S., Sjöström R., Lindén S., Bäckström A., Lundberg C., Arnqvist A., Mahdavi J., Nilsson U.J., Velapatiño B., Gilman R.H., Gerhard M., Alarcon T., López-Brea M., Nakazawa T., Fox J.G., Correa P., Dominguez-Bello M.G., Perez-Perez G.I., Blaser M.J., Normark S., Carlstedt I., Oscarson S., Teneberg S., Berg D.E., Borén T. Functional adaptation of BabA, the H. pylori ABO blood group antigen binding adhesin. Science (80-.) 2004;305:519–522. doi: 10.1126/science.1098801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Rossez Y., Gosset P., Boneca I.G., Magalh??es A., Ecobichon C., Reis C.A., Cieniewski-Bernard C., Curt M.J.C., L??onard R., Maes E., Sperandio B., Slomianny C., Sansonetti P.J., Michalski J.C., Robbe-Masselot C. The lacdiNAc-specific adhesin LabA mediates adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric mucosa. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;210:1286–1295. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Mahdavi J., Sondén B., Hurtig M., Olfat F.O., Forsberg L., Roche N., Ångström J., Larsson T., Teneberg S., Altraja S., Wadström T., Kersulyte D., Berg D.E., Petersson C., Magnusson K., Norberg T., Lindh F., Lundskog B.B., Arnqvist A., Hammarström L., Borén T. Helicobacter pylori SabA adhesin in persistent infection and chronic inflammation. Science (80-.) 2008;297:573–578. doi: 10.1126/science.1069076.Helicobacter. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Prakobphol A., Borén T., Ma W., Zhixiang P., Fisher S.J. Highly glycosylated human salivary molecules present oligosaccharides that mediate adhesion of leukocytes and Helicobacter pylori. Biochemistry. 2005;44:2216–2224. doi: 10.1021/bi0480180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Issa S., Moran A.P., Ustinov S.N., Lin J.H.H., Ligtenberg A.J., Karlsson N.G. O-linked oligosaccharides from salivary agglutinin: helicobacter pylori binding sialyl-Lewis x and Lewis b are terminating moieties on hyperfucosylated oligo-N-acetyllactosamine. Glycobiology. 2010;20:1046–1057. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwq066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Prakobphol A., Xu F., Hoang V.M., Larsson T., Bergstrom J., Johansson I., Frängsmyr L., Holmskov U., Leffler H., Nilsson C., Borén T., Wright J.R., Strömberg N., Fisher S.J. Salivary agglutinin, which binds Streptococcus mutans and Helicobacter pylori, is the lung scavenger receptor cysteine-rich protein gp-340. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:39860–39866. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006928200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Magalhães A., Rossez Y., Robbe-Masselot C., Maes E., Gomes J., Shevtsova A., Bugaytsova J., Borén T., Reis C.A. Muc5ac gastric mucin glycosylation is shaped by FUT2 activity and functionally impacts Helicobacter pylori binding. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:25575. doi: 10.1038/srep25575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Lindén S., Mahdavi J., Semino-Mora C., Olsen C., Carlstedt I., Borén T., Dubois A. Role of ABO secretor status in mucosal innate immunity and H. pylori infection. PLoS. Pathog. 2008;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040002. e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.McGuckin M.A., Every A.L., Skene C.D., Linden S.K., Chionh Y.T., Swierczak A., McAuley J., Harbour S., Kaparakis M., Ferrero R., Sutton P. Muc1 mucin limits both Helicobacter pylori colonization of the murine gastric mucosa and associated gastritis. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1210–1218. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Ilver D. Helicobacter pylori adhesin binding fucosylated histo-blood group antigens revealed by retagging. Science (80-.) 1998;279:373–377. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Muñoz-Ramirez Z.Y., Pascoe B., Mendez-Tenorio A., Mourkas E., Sandoval-Motta S., Perez-Perez G., Morgan D.R., Dominguez R.L., Ortiz-Princz D., Cavazza M.E., Rocha G., Queiroz D.M.M., Catalano M., Zerbetto De Palma G., Goldman C.G., Venegas A., Alarcon T., Oleastro M., Vale F.F., Goodman K.J., Torres R.C., Berthenet E., Hitchings M.D., Blaser M.J., Sheppard S.K., Thorell K., Torres J. A 500-year tale of co-evolution, adaptation, and virulence: helicobacter pylori in the Americas. ISMe J. 2021;15:78–92. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00758-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Wilkinson D.J., Dickins B., Robinson K., Winter J.A. Genomic diversity of Helicobacter pylori populations from different regions of the human stomach. Gut. Microbes. 2022;14 doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2152306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Moonens K., Gideonsson P., Subedi S., Bugaytsova J., Romaõ E., Mendez M., Nordén J., Fallah M., Rakhimova L., Shevtsova A., Lahmann M., Castaldo G., Brännström K., Coppens F., Lo A.W., Ny T., Solnick J.V., Vandenbussche G., Oscarson S., Hammarström L., Arnqvist A., Berg D.E., Muyldermans S., Borén T., Remaut H. Structural insights into polymorphic ABO glycan binding by Helicobacter pylori. Cell Host. Microbe. 2016;19:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Thorell K., Hosseini S., Palacios Gonzáles R.V.P., Chaotham C., Graham D.Y., Paszat L., Rabeneck L., Lundin S.B., Nookaew I., Sjöling Å. Identification of a Latin American-specific BabA adhesin variant through whole genome sequencing of Helicobacter pylori patient isolates from Nicaragua. BMC. Evol. Biol. 2016;16:53. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0619-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Nell S., Kennemann L., Schwarz S., Josenhans C., Suerbaum S. Dynamics of Lewis b binding and sequence variation of the babA adhesin gene during chronic Helicobacter pylori infection in humans. mBio. 2014;5 doi: 10.1128/mBio.02281-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Hage N., Howard T., Phillips C., Brassington C., Overman R., Debreczeni J., Gellert P., Stolnik S., Winkler G.S., Falcone F.H. Structural basis of Lewis b antigen binding by the Helicobacter pylori adhesin BabA. Sci. Adv. 2015;1 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Benktander J., Barone A., Johansson M.M., Teneberg S. Helicobacter pylori SabA binding gangliosides of human stomach. Virulence. 2018;9:738–751. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1440171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Bennett H.J., Roberts I.S. Identification of a new sialic acid-binding protein in Helicobacter pylori. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2005;44:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Voland P., Weeks D.L., Vaira D., Prinz C., Sachs G. Specific identification of three low molecular weight membrane-associated antigens of Helicobacter pylori. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002;16:533–544. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Somiah T., Gebremariam H.G., Zuo F., Smirnova K., Jonsson A.B. Lactate causes downregulation of Helicobacter pylori adhesin genes sabA and labA while dampening the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:20064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24311-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Huang L., Wang L., Lin X., Su Y., Qin Y., Kong W., Zhao L., Xu X., Yan Q. mcp, aer, cheB, and cheV contribute to the regulation of Vibrio alginolyticus (ND -01) adhesion under gradients of environmental factors. Microbiologyopen. 2017;6 doi: 10.1002/mbo3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Dons L., Eriksson E., Jin Y., Martin E., Kristensson K., Larsen C.N., Olsen J.E., Rottenberg M.E. Role of flagellin and the two-component CheA/CheY system of Listeria monocytogenes in host cell invasion and virulence. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:3237–3244. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3237-3244.2004.Updated. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Paraskevopoulou V., Schimpl M., Overman R.C., Stolnik S., Chen Y., Nguyen L., Winkler G.S., Gellert P., Klassen J.S., Falcone F.H. Structural and binding characterization of the LacdiNAc-specific adhesin (LabA; HopD) exodomain from Helicobacter pylori. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 2021;3:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Moran A.P., Annuk H., Prendergast M.M. Antibodies induced by ganglioside-mimicking Campylobacter jejuni lipooligosaccharides recognise epitopes at the nodes of Ranvier. J. Neuroimmunol. 2005;165:179–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Ruiz-Palacios G.M., Cervantes L.E., Ramos P., Chavez-Munguia B., Newburg D.S. Campylobacter jejuni binds intestinal H(O) antigen (Fucα1, 2Galβ1, 4GlcNAc), and fucosyloligosaccharides of human milk inhibit its binding and infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:14112–14120. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207744200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Cinco M., Banfi E., Ruaro E., Crevatin D., Crotti D. Evidence for L-fucose (6-deoxy-l-galactopyranose)-mediated adherence of Campylobacter spp. to epithelial cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1984;21:347–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb00334.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Tu Q.V., McGuckin M.A., Mendz G.L. Campylobacter jejuni response to human mucin MUC2: modulation of colonization and pathogenicity determinants. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008;57:795–802. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47752-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Stahl M., Friis L.M., Nothaft H., Liu X., Li J., Szymanski C.M., Stintzi A. L-Fucose utilization provides Campylobacter jejuni with a competitive advantage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011;108:7194–7199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014125108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Middendorf P.S., Zomer A.L., Bergval I.L., Jacobs-Reitsma W.F., den Besten H.M.W., Abee T. Host associations of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates carrying the L-fucose or D-glucose utilization cluster. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024;425 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Day C.J., Tiralongo J., Hartnell R.D., Logue C.A., Wilson J.C., von Itzstein M., Korolik V. Differential carbohydrate recognition by Campylobacter jejuni strain 11168: influences of temperature and growth conditions. PLoS. One. 2009;4:e4927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Mahdavi J., Pirinccioglu N., Oldfield N.J., Carlsohn E., Stoof J., Aslam A., Self T., Cawthraw S.A., Petrovska L., Colborne N., Sihlbom C., Borén T., Wooldridge K.G., Ala'Aldeen D.A.A. A novel O-linked glycan modulates Campylobacter jejuni major outer membrane protein-mediated adhesion to human histo-blood group antigens and chicken colonization. Open. Biol. 2014;4 doi: 10.1098/rsob.130202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.McSweegan E., Walker R.I. Identification and characterization of two Campylobacter jejuni adhesins for cellular and mucous substrates. Infect. Immun. 1986;53:141–148. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.1.141-148.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Day C.J., King R.M., Shewell L.K., Tram G., Najnin T., Hartley-Tassell L.E., Wilson J.C., Fleetwood A.D., Zhulin I.B., Korolik V. A direct-sensing galactose chemoreceptor recently evolved in invasive strains of Campylobacter jejuni. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13206. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Elgamoudi B.A., Andrianova E.P., Shewell L.K., Day C.J., King R.M., Taha H.Rahman, Hartley-Tassell L.E., Zhulin I.B., Korolik V. The Campylobacter jejuni chemoreceptor Tlp10 has a bimodal ligand-binding domain and specificity for multiple classes of chemoeffectors. Sci. Signal. 2021;14 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abc8521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Clayton D.J., Bowen A.J., Hulme S.D., Buckley A.M., Deacon V.L., Thomson N.R., Barrow P.A., Morgan E., Jones M.A., Watson M., Stevens M.P. Analysis of the role of 13 major fimbrial subunits in colonisation of the chicken intestines by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis reveals a role for a novel locus. BMC. Microbiol. 2008;8:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Gerling-Driessen U.I.M., Hoffmann M., Schmidt S., Snyder N.L., Hartmann L. Glycopolymers against pathogen infection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023;52:2617–2642. doi: 10.1039/D2CS00912A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Klein R.D., Hultgren S.J. Urinary tract infections: microbial pathogenesis, host–pathogen interactions and new treatment strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;18:211–226. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0324-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Wojtczak K., Byrne J.P. Structural considerations for building synthetic glycoconjugates as inhibitors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectins. ChemMedChem. 2022;17 doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202200081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Carlucci L.A., Johnson K.C., Thomas W.E. FimH-mannose noncovalent bonds survive minutes to hours under force. Biophys. J. 2024;123:3038–3050. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Ponnuraj K., Bowden M.G., Davis S., Gurusiddappa S., Moore D., Choe D., Xu Y., Hook M., Narayana S.V.L. A “dock, lock, and latch” structural model for a staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell. 2003;115:217–228. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00809-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Laventie B.J., Jenal U. Surface sensing and adaptation in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;74:735–760. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-012120-063427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Marshall J., Rossez Y., Mainda G., Gally D.L., Daniell T.J., Holden N.J. Alternate thermoregulation and functional binding of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae in environmental and animal isolates. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016;363:fnw251. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Rossez Y., Holmes A., Lodberg-Pedersen H., Birse L., Marshall J., Willats W.G.T., Toth I.K., Holden N.J. Escherichia coli common pilus (ECP) targets arabinosyl residues in plant cell walls to mediate adhesion to fresh produce plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:34349–34365. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.587717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Larsonneur F., Martin F.A., Mallet A., Martinez-Gil M., Semetey V., Ghigo J.M., Beloin C. Functional analysis of Escherichia coli Yad fimbriae reveals their potential role in environmental persistence. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;18:5228–5248. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Holmes A., Rossez Y., Wright K.M., Hedley P.E., Morris J., Willats W.G.T., Holden N.J. Escherichia coli O157:H7 F9 fimbriae recognize plant xyloglucan and elicit a response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9720. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Cohen M., Varki A. Modulation of glycan recognition by clustered saccharide patches. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014;308:75–125. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800097-7.00003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Luis A.S., Hansson G.C. Intestinal mucus and their glycans: a habitat for thriving microbiota. Cell Host. Microbe. 2023;31:1087–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.McCallum G., Tropini C. The gut microbiota and its biogeography. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024;22:105–118. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00969-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Nason R., Büll C., Konstantinidi A., Sun L., Ye Z., Halim A., Du W., Sørensen D.M., Durbesson F., Furukawa S., Mandel U., Joshi H.J., Dworkin L.A., Hansen L., David L., Iverson T.M., Bensing B.A., Sullam P.M., Varki A., de Vries E., de Haan C.A.M., Vincentelli R., Henrissat B., Vakhrushev S.Y., Clausen H., Narimatsu Y. Display of the human mucinome with defined O-glycans by gene engineered cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4070. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24366-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Taleb V., Liao Q., Narimatsu Y., García-García A., Compañón I., Borges R.J., González-Ramírez A.M., Corzana F., Clausen H., Rovira C., Hurtado-Guerrero R. Structural and mechanistic insights into the cleavage of clustered O-glycan patches-containing glycoproteins by mucinases of the human gut. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4324. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32021-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Blanchette K.A., Shenoy A.T., Milner J., Gilley R.P., McClure E., Hinojosa C.A., Kumar N., Daugherty S.C., Tallon L.J., Ott S., King S.J., Ferreira D.M., Gordon S.B., Tettelin H., Orihuela C.J. Neuraminidase A-exposed galactose promotes Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm formation during colonization. Infect. Immun. 2016;84:2922–2932. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00277-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Sorieul C., Dolce M., Romano M.R., Codée J., Adamo R. Glycoconjugate vaccines against antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Expert. Rev. Vaccines. 2023;22:1055–1078. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2274955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from BBA Advances are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES