In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Tables 6 and 9. There was a typographical error in the coding of items 88 and 89 in Supplementary Tables 6 and 9. Italicization indicates items that are reverse coded. In the original Supplementary Tables, item 88 was italicized, suggesting it was reverse coded, while item 89 was not italicized, indicating normal coding. The corrected tables show that item 88 should not be italicized, indicating it is normally coded, and item 89 should be italicized, indicating it is reverse coded. This typo was present only in the Supplementary Tables and did not affect the data processing and analysis, which were correct. The correct material statement has been published in the original article.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.