Skip to main content
The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia logoLink to The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia
letter
. 2024 Dec 14;32:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100516

Methodological concerns in the ‘Economic burden of suicide deaths in India (2019)’

Anamika Pandey 1, G Anil Kumar 1,∗, Rakhi Dandona 1
PMCID: PMC11980693  PMID: 40207050

We read with interest the research article by Nigam and colleagues1 published in The Lancet Regional Health—Southeast Asia, which estimated the economic burden of suicide deaths in India and states in 2019 using the approach previously applied in other studies.2,3 However, we found certain methodological issues with this study1 and have highlighted them in this Correspondence. We replicated the analysis using the approach described in the paper and data provided in the Excel file published online. We utilised the number of suicide deaths from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019 Results tool4 as these data were not reported in the paper1 but were mentioned. Our replication yielded lower estimates of economic loss than reported in the paper using the same data and approach. For instance, for females and males aged 10–14 years, the replicated economic loss estimate was 1.2–6.0 times lower across the states than that reported (Supplementary Information). Varying levels of estimates were calculated for other age groups as well. Given this variation, to confirm our approach, we replicated the economic loss due to maternal deaths as reported by Kirigia and colleagues2 which is the basis of the approach followed by Nigam and colleagues.1 Our replicated estimates matched with those reported in the paper by Kirigia and colleagues.2 Furthermore, the authors have provided estimates for Puducherry. However, the GBD does not provide separate suicide estimates for Union Territories except for Delhi and Jammu and Kashmir & Ladakh. Given these discrepancies, the reported economic loss estimates due to suicide deaths by Nigam and colleagues1 warrant further review.

Contributors

GAK performed the calculations with inputs from AP and RD. AP drafted the correspondence and other authors contributed and agreed with the final version. All authors had the final responsibility for the decision to submit the correspondence for publication.

Declaration of interests

We declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100516.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary Information
mmc1.xlsx (439.4KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Nigam A., Vuddemarry M., Zadey S. Economic burden of suicide deaths in India (2019): a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024;29 doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kirigia J.M., Mwabu G.M., Orem J.N., Muthuri R.D. Indirect cost of maternal deaths in the WHO African region in 2010. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:299. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kirigia J.M., Muthuri R.D.K., Muthuri N.G. The monetary value of human lives lost to suicide in the african continent: beating the African War Drums. Healthcare. 2020;8:84. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Global burden of disease study 2019 results. 2019. https://gbd2019.healthdata.org/gbd-results/

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
mmc1.xlsx (439.4KB, xlsx)

Articles from The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES