Skip to main content
Mediators of Inflammation logoLink to Mediators of Inflammation
. 2025 Feb 26;2025:9999723. doi: 10.1155/mi/9999723

Progress of ADAM17 in Fibrosis-Related Diseases

Suyan Yan 1, Yaqi Zhao 2, Yuyu Yang 3, Baocheng Liu 1, Wei Xu 2, Zhenzhen Ma 1,4,, Qingrui Yang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11986189  PMID: 40224489

Abstract

Fibrosis leads to structural damage and functional decline and is characterized by an accumulation of fibrous connective tissue and a reduction in parenchymal cells. Because of its extremely poor prognosis, organ fibrosis poses a significant economic burden. In order to prevent and treat fibrosis more effectively, potential mechanisms need to be investigated. A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) is a membrane-bound protein. It regulates intracellular signaling and membrane protein degradation. Fibrosis mediated by ADAM17 has been identified as an important contributor, although the specific relationship between its multiple regulatory functions and the pathogenesis is unclear. This article describes ADAM17 activation, function, and regulation, as well as the role of ADAM17 mediated fibrosis injury in kidney, liver, heart, lung, skin, endometrium, and retina. To develop new therapeutic approaches based on ADAM17 related signal pathways.

Keywords: ADAM17, EGFR, fibrosis


Summary

  • • This review focuses on A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) components and its role in fibrosis and presents research progress.

  • • We describe the specific mechanisms by which ADAM17 induces fibrosis in different organs, including the kidney, liver, heart, lung, skin, endometrium, and retinal.

  • • We explore the possible factors through which ADAM17 contributes to fibrosis via inflammatory factors and cytokines in acute and chronic diseases are explored.

  • • We outline the most studied mechanisms underlying ADAM17-induced fibrosis and their potential implications.

1. Introduction

In most systemic disease processes, fibrosis is a process of scar repair. In response to specific cytokines and oxidative stress, replacement of native tissue with dense connective tissue due to homeostatic imbalances, leads to normal tissue becoming dysfunctional, organ dysfunction, and significant morbidity and mortality [1, 2] (Figure 1). A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17), also known as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) transform enzyme, is a membrane-associated enzyme that breaks down cell surface proteins [35]. Through its shedding enzyme function, ADAM17 is a regulator of cell propagation, growth, inflammation, and other cellular processes [6]. Dysregulation of ADAM17 has been strongly implicated in a variety of pathological conditions including asthma, cancer, arthritis, and fibrosis [79]. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to provide insight into the structure, activation, and regulation of ADAM17 during fibrosis development and to discuss how ADAM17-induced long-term inflammation and advanced fibrosis exacerbate organ failure. The family of ADAMs and their functions in the absence of pathology are shown in Table S1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The general fibrotic process. CXCL12, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12; ECM, extracellular matrix; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β. Drawing using Adobe illustrator software.

2. Biological Characteristics of ADAM17

An ADAM is a family of type I transmembrane and secreted metalloendopeptidases that act by cleaving ectodomains of membrane anchored growth factors, cytokines, and receptors [10, 11]. As of today, 22 ADAMs have been recognized in the human genome. ADAMs are generally composed of a number of characteristic protein domains: an N-terminal signal sequence surrounded by a prodomain, a catalytic domain, a disintegrin domain, a cysteine-rich region, an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain, a transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic tail [1214]. As opposed to the typical ADAMs, ADAM17 does not contain an EGF-like domain, instead, it consists of a membrane-proximal domain. A membrane proximal domain is followed by a brief stalk sequence that is highly conservation across the animal kingdom and is known as the CANDIS domain [6, 15, 16]. ADAM17 matures by furin-dependent processing at either a canonical proprotein convertase (PC) cleavage site at the prodomain/catalytic domain interface [17] or an upstream PC cleavage site [18] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The structure of classical ADAMs and ADAM17. The structure of classical ADAMs consists of a pro-domain, catalytic domain, a disintegrin-like domain, a cysteine-rich region, an EGF-like domain, a transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic tail. ADAM17 includes a pro-domain, catalytic domain, a disintegrin-like domain, a membrane proximal domain, CANDIS domain, transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic tail. ADAM17: A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17; EGF-like domain: epidermal growth factor-like domain. Drawing using Adobe illustrator software.

The N-terminus of ADAM17 includes signaling sequences that direct the protein to the secretory pathway [12]. ADAM17′s prodomain is essential for intracellular transport and functions as an intramolecular chaperone to ensure proper protein folding [19, 20]. Additionally, it prevents the catalytic activity of the enzyme via a cysteine switch mechanism [21] in which cysteine residues in the pro-domain coordinate zinc ions in the catalytic site, inhibiting catalysis [22]. In terms of its catalytic domain, ADAM17 shares some similarities with snake venom metalloproteinases [23, 24] and is relatively resistant to tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 [25]. This disintegrin-like domain is critical for interacting with integrins, mediating adhesion between neighboring cells, activating various receptors, and initiating various cell signaling pathways [26]. Additional, recombinant expression of the ADAM17 disintegrin-like domain impairs fibroblast-cancer cell interaction [27]. Protein disulfide isomerase interacts with the membraneproximal domain to participate in dimerization and substrate recognition, resulting in structural changes between the activated open state and the inactive closed conformation [28, 29]. A key substrate of ADAM17, the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), is mediated by CANDIS, whose substrate binding properties are modulated by its membrane proximal domain [16, 30]. The distinct compositions of the cytoplasmic tails are critical for their distinct roles in metalloproteinase activity, intracellular signaling, and subcellular localization. As a consequence, ADAM17 plays a significant role in physiopathological processes throughout the body.

3. Role of ADAM17 in Fibrosis

3.1. ADAM17 and Renal Fibrosis

As shown by RNA in situ hybridization in human normal kidneys, ADAM17 gene expression is highest in the distal tubules. Conversely, ADAM17 gene expression observed in glomerular endothelium, glomerular mesangium, peritubular capillaries, and proximal tubules [31]. The glomerular parietal epithelium and podocytes of patients with chronic renal disease express high levels of ADAM17 mRNA. De novo expression has also been reported in the glomerular endothelium, mesangium, peritubular capillaries, and proximal tubules in kidney disease [31, 32].

Renal fibrosis is marked by the overproduction and enrichment of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in the kidney, leading to parenchymal scarring, renal failure, and eventually end stage renal disease (ESRD) [33, 34]. An essential role is performed by the EGF receptor (EGFR), a member of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinase receptors. Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been shown by genetic knock out and pharmacological inhibition studies to be protected by early activation of the EGFR pathway, while sustained EGFR signaling leads to renal injury and fibrosis in experimental AKI [3537]. A study by Liu et al. [36] showed that unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) induced renal fibrosis significantly decreased smooth muscle actin expression, a hallmark of activated fibroblasts, and reduced collagen and fibronectin accumulation in the kidney by pharmacological inhibition or genetic reduction of EGFR activity [38]. To activate EGFR, membrane-bound precursors must be converted into soluble ligands by shedding enzymes. Recombinant EGFR ligands, for example, amphiregulin (AREG), heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF), epiregulin (EREG), and transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), are predominantly shed by ADAM17 [39]. After total body irradiation, targeted AREG mitigated the development of renal fibrosis. An intravenous injection of SAMiRNA targeting mouse AREG mRNA decreased radiation induced collagen accumulation in the renal cortex and medulla [40]. AREG has been demonstrated to upregulate ADAM17 in vitro [39]. In human proximal tubular epithelial cells, quercetin significantly improved TGF-β1 (TGF-β1) induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which was accompanied by increased AREG expression. It has also been shown that quercetin inhibits AREG binding to EGFR, suggesting that it alleviates fibrosis by inhibiting AREG/EGFR signaling [41]. A renal fibrosis model was established in mice induced by angiotensinogen II (Ang II) and its sheddase, metalloprotease-17. Targeted deletion of TGF-α or inhibiting its cleavage with a specific metalloprotease-17 inhibitor significantly reduced Ang II-induced EGFR phosphorylation and renal injury, indicating the relevance of the ADAM17/TGF-α/EGFR pathway in Ang II-induced renal injury [42]. TNF-α and HB-EGF, both ADAM17 substrate, are associated with renal damage in lupus nephritis by activation of the EGFR signal pathway and by causing renal inflammation [43], indicating a role for EGFR ligands or EGFR in the pathogenesis of renal fibrous formation.

In the classical interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling pathway, IL-6 binding to membrane IL-6Rs triggers signaling through glycoprotein 130 (gp130) as a signal transducer [44, 45]. Nevertheless, this signaling pathway depends on the presence of both IL-6R and gp130 on the same cell membrane. Experimental crescentic glomerulonephritis appears to be benefited by classical IL-6 signaling [46, 47]. However, IL-6 trans-signaling is thought to be involved in the progression of kidney disease. IL-6 trans-signaling involves ADAM17, which converts membrane-bound IL-6R to a soluble receptor that forms a soluble complex that stimulates cells with only gp130 on their membranes (e.g., renal endothelial, epithelial, or mesangial cells). Recombinant soluble gp130 extracellular structural domain coupled to the Fc portion of IgG prevents renal fibrosis by suppressing gp130/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3 in various mouse models [48]. Thus, inhibition of ADAM17 may reduce IL-6 trans pathway-mediated renal injury, while preserving classical nephroprotective IL-6 signaling.

Injury increases the expression of ADAM17 and its substrates, enhancing ADAM17 activity on the cell surface and increasing the release of soluble TNF-α, which activates TNF receptor-1 and receptor-2 (TNFR1/2). The TNF-α/TNFR1/2 pathway leads to tissue necrosis and proinflammatory cytokines, resulting in renal fibrosis after kidney injury [39]. In another study, a mouse model of type 1 diabetes was used to examine the role of endothelial ADAM17 (eADAM17) and proximal tubular ADAM17 (tADAM17) deficiencies in the regulation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), renal inflammation, and fibrosis. In addition, eADAM17 deficiency reduced renal fibrosis and inflammation, whereas tADAM17 deletion reduced podocyte loss, attenuated the RAS and decreased macrophage invasion, smooth muscle actin, and collagen accumulation [49]. ADAM17 promotes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) shedding to induce thylakoid matrix expansion, collagen deposition, and progression of diabetic nephropathy [50]. Inhibition of ADAM17 reduced renal fibrosis in mice with Ang II-induced kidney disease [51]. These findings indicate that ADAM17 may regulate downstream signaling pathways by activating the RAS through ACE2 cleavage.

3.2. ADAM17 and Liver Fibrosis

As a result of a variety of chronic liver diseases, liver fibrosis can develop. This condition is characterized by long-term parenchymal injury or chronic inflammation, which stimulates the transdifferentiation of hepatic stellate cells into stromal secretory myofibroblasts.

A heterogeneous population of proliferating, migrating, and profibrotic cells, liver myofibroblasts play a major role in promoting liver fibrosis [52]. Physiological and pathological changes in the liver can be influenced by ADAM17 under normal or abnormal conditions. ADAM17-deficient mice are lethal perinatally and show development defects related to EGFR signaling in the eye, hair, and skin [53]. ADAM17 h-KO mice expressing hepatocyte-specific knockouts of ADAM17 were significantly attenuated by partial hepatectomy following two-thirds partial hepatectomy, indicates that ADAM17 is the primary sheddase that produces these factors [54]. The TNFR1 receptor regulates liver regeneration and synergizes with the EGFR signaling pathway within the liver cells, initiating DNA replication cascades [55]. Additionally, ADAM10- and ADAM17-deficient mice in a partial hepatectomy model showed reduced protein kinase B phosphorylation and decreased release of EGFR-activating factors, indicating that synchronous ablation of ADAM10 and ADAM17 results in inhibited EGFR signaling [56].

C-mer tyrosine kinase (MerTK) is a member of the Tyro-Axl-MerTK family of proteins. It is expressed at high levels on macrophages and has various ligands, including Gas6 and protein S [57, 58]. Human genetic studies have shown that two single-nucleotide intronic polymorphisms in MerTK, rs4374383 A and rs6726639 A, are linked to reduced hepatic expression of MerTK and decreased risk of liver fibrosis [59, 60]. Interestingly, ADAM17 is capable of cleaving MerTK into soluble Mer (s-Mer) [61, 62]. In nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, limiting ADAM17 activity increases MerTK expression in macrophages, which further induces TGF-β1 production, leading to the activation of hepatic stellate cells by TGF-β1 to encourage liver fibrosis [63].

ADAM17 maturation is triggered by cofactors such as inactive rhomboid protein 2 (iRhom2), an ineffective member of the rhomboid protease family that is encoded by the Rhbdf2 gene [6467]. iRhom2 and ADAM17 are both found in the endoplasmic reticulum, where iRhom2 facilitates the translocation of ADAM17 to the plasma membrane [64]. ADAM17 activity is enhanced following deletion of the cytoplasmic tail, leading to increased TNFR shedding and decreased apoptosis following TNF-α exposure [65]. Phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail of iRhom2 leads to dissociation of ADAM17, accompanied by an enhancement of its catalytic activity [68, 69]. The liver of iRhom1 and 2 double knockout mice lacked mature ADAM17 expression. Similarly, iRhom2 knockout mice showed no reduction in mature ADAM17 expression in the liver [70]. It has been shown that iRhom2 deletion reduces the shedding of ADAM17 substrates (such as TNF-α, L-selectin, HB-EGF, TNFR1, TNFR2, and AREG) [65, 71, 72]. iRhom2 is a key regulator of multiple aspects of ADAM17 biology, including its maturation and catalytic activity, as these studies demonstrate. In a bile duct ligation (BDL) mouse model of liver fibrosis, Rhbdf2-/-BDL mice were found to have reduced ADAM17 activation and TNFR shedding following BDL, suggesting an increase in unbound TNFR on the surface of hepatic stellate cells or hepatocytes, promoting TNF-α binding to TNFR and driving hepatic stellate cell growth and liver fibrosis [73]. Although iRhom2 deficiency decreases TNF-α release, it does not completely prevent it [74]. In addition, unshed membrane-bound TNF-α can still bind and activate both TNFR1 and TNFR2, albeit with varying efficiencies [75, 76]. The result, ADAM17 contributes to a variety of liver diseases and fibrosis through substrate cleavage, but the specific mechanisms remain a mystery.

3.3. ADAM17 and Myocardial Fibrosis

Myocardial fibrosis is a shared pathophysiological process in numerous cardiac diseases, including heart attack, hypertension, and heart failures, and is marked by excessive deposition of ECM proteins [77]. This process is originally intended to safeguard cardiac function by the repair, replacement, and strengthening of heavily or permanently damaged tissue. Over-deposition of ECM decreases ventricular compliance and cardiomyocyte contractile function, resulting in heart failure and increased mortality [78].

ADAM17 activates AREG through proteolytic cleavage. The AREG protein is either consolidated as a type I transmembrane protein, which may be involved in signaling in bordering cells, or released as soluble AREG after protein hydrolysis, acting as an autocrine or as a paracrine factor [79, 80]. AREG soluble expression is widespread on cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, acting as a ligand for EGFR [79]. EGFR activation in the heart triggers important intracellular signaling pathways that control fibroblast proliferation, migration, and collagen synthesis. In chronic stress states marked by sustained elevation of soluble AREG, however, prolonged EGFR activation enhances cardiac fibroblast activation, proliferation, and myofibroblast differentiation mediated by the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathway and promotes cell migration and collagen synthesis, contributing to cardiac fibrosis [79]. Increased levels of TNF-α and IL-6 secreted by macrophages and T and B lymphocytes during chronic inflammation also contribute to the exacerbation of cardiac fibrosis, whereas upregulation of ADAM17 enhances the secretion of these cytokines by innate and adaptive immune cells through either direct or indirect cascades, thereby, contributing to maladaptive interstitial fibrosis [81, 82].

Ang II and its generating enzyme ACE, the main axis of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), have long been linked to the incidence and severity of cardiovascular disease [83]. Vasoconstriction is caused by Ang II [84], proliferation by Ang II [85], inflammation by Ang II [86], and coagulation by Ang II [87]. There is increasing support that another RAAS pathway has a protective effect on the heart [88, 89]. A homolog of ACE, ACE2, which is cleaved by ADAM17, reduces myocardial fibrosis, hypertrophy, and apoptosis by binding to the MAS receptor (MASR) [90]. In spite of this, experimental studies have shown conflicting results regarding ADAM17′s role in cardiomyopathy. The expression of ADAM17 is elevated in the myocardium of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in animal models [91]. In Ang II-induced hypertensive mice and in spontaneously hypertensive rats, inhibition of ADAM17 with small interference RNA inhibited myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis [92]. ADAM17 appears to be a double-edged sword, potentially useful only in circumstances where the RAS is highly activated.

3.4. ADAM17 and Pulmonary Fibrosis

As a consequence of excessive deposition of ECM proteins by active lung fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, pulmonary fibrosis leads to decreased gas exchange and reduced lung function [93]. According to a clinical study, serum ADAM17 expression was noteworthy higher in patients with inflammatory myopathies than in healthy individuals. In addition, patients who combined with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) had higher ADAM17 expression than patients with inflammatory myopathies alone [94], highlighting elevated ADAM17 expression in patients with inflammatory myopathies, particularly IPF. An additional clinical study confirmed that ADAM17 expression was higher in IPF patients and connective tissue diseases as well as interstitial lung disease than in healthy controls, with patients with acute exacerbations of IPF showing significantly higher ADAM17 expression than those with stable IPF; these findings suggest that ADAM17 plays a significant role in the progression of pulmonary fibrosis [95]. ADAM17 expression is widespread throughout the lung tissue [96]. TGF-β induces increased expression of connective tissue growth factor in human lung epithelial cells through the signal transduction pathway of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/ADAM17/ribosomal S6 kinases 1 (RSK1)/CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ), thereby, promoting pulmonary EMT and increasing fibronectin levels. Evidence also suggests that the ADAM17–EGFR–ERK pathway contributes to lung fibrosis [97, 98]. Therefore, ADAM17 has an important role in lung fibrosis and may be a therapeutic target.

3.5. ADAM17 and Dermal Fibrosis

Several inflammatory or autoimmune skin diseases can cause dermal fibrosis, which is defined by an excessive accumulation of ECM constituents in the dermis [99]. The Notch signaling pathway has been implicated in fibrosis [100]. Notch has been reported to be activated in patients with either localized scleroderma or diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc) [101]. In mammals, the Notch family is composed of four transmembrane receptors (Notch-1 to Notch-4) and five ligands (Jagged1, Jagged2, Delta1, Delta3, and Delta4). At all stages of the development, Notch signaling is implicated in cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis, and differentiation [102104]. A ligand must bind to the Notch ectodomain to trigger its shedding by ADAM-10 or ADAM-17 during Notch signaling [105, 106]. Thus, ADAM17-mediated regulation of dermal fibrosis is via Notch signaling. Furthermore, ADAM17–EGFR promotes dermal fibrosis in SSc mice in conjunction with increased inflammation caused by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) in skin fibroblasts [107].

3.6. ADAM17 and Endometrial Fibrosis

The existence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity is characteristic of endometriosis, a benign gynecological inflammatory disease [108]. Research has shown that oxidative stress plays an essential role in the development and course of endometriosis [109, 110]. Endometriosis is also characterized by fibrosis, which is seen in ectopic lesions and is strongly associated with the most serious forms of the disease [111]. ADAM17 expression is elevated during inflammatory processes, especially in the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [112, 113]. There was a significantly positive correlation between the levels of ADAM17 proteinase and advanced oxidation protein products in the peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis [114]. ADAM17 has also been shown to play a major role in the proteolysis of NICD (from the Notch-1 receptor) following ligand binding in in vitro experiments [115]. There are two consecutive cleavages of the active Notch receptor that release the NICD following activation of the Notch receptor. A NICD translocates to the nucleus and is implicated in the transcriptional regulation of nuclear target genes leading to fibrosis [101]. According to the above studies, ADAM17/Notch may play a role in the process of endometrial fibrosis.

3.7. ADAM17 and Retinal Fibrosis

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is critical for tumor neovascularisation, the formation of blood vessels within a tumor, which facilitates cancer cell survival, local tumor growth, and the formation of distant metastases [116]. VEGF binds to two different receptors, VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1) and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), with VEGFR2 thought to be the most important signaling receptor for endothelial cell membrane permeability, specification, and proliferation [117119]. Increased levels of VEGF have been found in vitreous samples from patients with retinal neovascular disease, suggesting a role for VEGF in retinal disease [120]. Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, located between the choroid and the retina, play a critical role in the methodogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [121]. RPE cells also seize a variety of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. These include IL-6, IL-11, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), TGF-β, and VEGF [122]. TGF-β and VEGF have been shown to significantly regulate Snail mRNA, which is associated with EMT. VEGF promotes VEGFR2 shedding via ADAM17, thereby, promoting the EMT process [123]. Evidence that ADAM17 is in relation to the pathogenesis of retinal fibrosis. A previous study indicated that inhibition of VEGF-mediated EMT signaling by cotreatment with vandetanib and an ADAM inhibitor is a novel and potentially promising therapeutic intervention for retinal pathologies [124]. Figure 3 summarizes the organ fibrotic process under ADAM17 activation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The organ fibrotic process in the condition of ADAM17 activation. ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; ADAM17, a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17; Ang (1-7), angiotensinogen (1-7); Ang II, angiotensinogen II; AREG, amphiregulin; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; gp130, glycoprotein 130; JAK, Janus kinase; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-6R, IL-6 receptor; MASR, MAS receptor; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MerTK, C-mer tyrosine kinase; RSK-1, ribosomal S6 kinases-1; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; TGF-α, transforming growth factor-α; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; TNFR, TNF receptor; TNFR1/2, TNF receptor-1/2. Drawing using Adobe illustrator software.

4. Limitations

Our review of ADAM17 pathogenesis and fibrosis-related diseases revealed that the relevant mechanisms have not yet been fully explained and the conclusions are not entirely consistent. Thus, ADAM17 is still a target for therapeutic intervention in fibrosis-related diseases and much research is needed before it can be proven efficacious.

5. Outlook

As discussed, ADAM17 is primarily studied as a disease-promoting cleavage protein, which is widely expressed in somatic cells and cleaves various substrates (including TNF-α, HB-EGF, AREG, IL-6R, and Notch) to promote disease onset and fibrosis development; it also plays protective roles, for instance, ADAM17 cleaves MerTK into s-Mer, which, through the ERK/TGFβ1 pathway, can be profibrotic. The inhibition of MerTK cleavage by ADAM17 contributes to the development of fibrosis. Similarly, ADAM17 cleaves ACE2 in order to convert Ang II into Ang II-VII, which exerts a protective effect against fibrosis. Therefore, ADAM17′s role depends on the membrane proteins it cleaves.

This review focuses mainly on the profibrotic effect of ADAM17. There are currently no clinically available inhibitors of ADAM17, making it a potentially effective antifibrosis strategy. Previously, we were aware of two ADAM17 inhibitors: DPC 333 (BMS-561392) [125] and TMI-005 (apratastat) [126]. However, both of these agents have some inhibitory effect on different ADAMs as well have not progressed past phase II trials due to toxicity or lack of efficacy. As reported by Xu et al. [127], a novel inhibitor of the Notch activating/cleaving enzyme ADAM17, ZLDI-8, inhibited NOTCH protein degradation, thereby, reducing the expression of pro-survival/anti-apoptosis and EMT-related proteins. But even with inhibitors specific to ADAM17 and not other metallases, the side effects would be significant. As more ADAM17 substrates are identified, there is increasing evidence that ADAM17 plays a role in almost all cellular functions. Its function as a major sheddase makes it essential for normal mammalian development and adult life. However, some studies have shown that despite the large number of substrates that have been assigned to ADAM17, it is notable that only a small number (e.g., IL-6R, EGFR ligands, and TNF-α) have been implicated in ADAM17 disease activity [128]. It is, therefore, likely that inhibitors targeting ADAM17 pathogenesis-related substrates will be a research focus in the future. Despite the fact that ADAM17 is a zinc-dependent metalloprotease with minimal sequence similarity to other ADAMs, most small molecules capable of inhibiting ADAM17 activity have failed in clinical trials. In addition, there are adverse side effects associated with other inhibitors of ADAM proteases, insufficient resorption and the formation of noxious metabolites [129 ]. For instance, TAPI-1 and GI254023X, which have been identified as potential ADAM17 inhibitors, have been observed to result in significant adverse effects in clinical settings. This is attributable to the presence of hydroxamate-based zinc binding groups, which facilitate their attachment to other zinc-dependent proteases [129, 130]. The sequestration of zinc (II) ions in zinc-dependent proteases is predominantly facilitated by the major functional groups of hydroxamate (CONHO), carboxylate (COO), thiolate (RS), and phosphorus (PO2). Among the compounds examined, hydroxamic acid followed by formylhydroxylamine exhibited the highest selectivity and potency for zinc binding. Consequently, the identification of non-zinc-binding compounds and the subsequent assessment of their farmacokinetics has the potential to enhance specificity and mitigate the adverse effects that are associated with ADAM17 inhibition. Nikfarjam et al. [131] employed bioinformatics techniques. Consequently, five drugs that have FDA approval, including both raltegravir and conivaptan, as well as paclitaxel, saquinavir, and venetoclax, were identified as having the capacity to inhibit the activity of the metalloenzyme ADAM17. However, these drugs were found to lack the necessary zinc-binding functional groups when assessed in testing. Further in silico analysis has demonstrated that raltegravir exhibits a favorable interaction with the active site and amino acids, in addition to the most advantageous kinetic properties when compared to other compounds. This suggests the potential for repurposing raltegravir as an antiviral agent to inhibit both serious inflammatory responses and tumourigenesis. This phenomenon can be attributed to ADAM17 dysfunction. In addition, targeting iRhom2, a binding protein specific to ADAM17, to inhibit ADAM17 activity is an emerging trend in ADAM17 inhibitor research. This is because iRhom2 is predominantly expressed in immune cells. Therefore, inhibitors would only affect the shedding processes on these cells. This may help to limit immune cell-mediated signaling via shed TNF-α in chronic inflammatory diseases without potentially affecting EGFR-mediated regeneration functions in nonimmune cells. However, a potential target could be the transmembrane helix (TMH) of ADAM17, which is a known interaction site with iRhoms. Here, disruption of the interaction site would destabilize the iRhom-ADAM17 complex, which could lead to a downregulation of ADAM17 activity [132].

Although it is still difficult and much remains to be explored and clarified, this should not dissuade us from trying to identify the cogwheels in the regulation mechanism of ADAM17 that could provide promising therapeutic approaches for the selective modification of this enzyme.

Acknowledgments

The authors have nothing to report.

Nomenclature

ADAM17:

A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

PC:

Proprotein convertase

IL-6R:

IL-6 receptor

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

UUO:

Unilateral ureteral obstruction

AREG:

Amphiregulin

HB-EGF:

Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor

EREG:

Epiregulin

TGF-α:

Transforming growth factor-α

EMT:

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

TGF-β1:

Transforming growth factor-β1

Ang II:

Angiotensinogen II

Ang (1-7):

Angiotensinogen (1-7)

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

gp130:

Glycoprotein 130

STAT:

Signal transducers and activators of transcription

TNFR1/2:

TNF receptor-1 and -2

eADAM17:

Endothelial ADAM17

tADAM17:

Tubular ADAM17

RAS:

Renin–angiotensin system

ACE2:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

MASR:

Mas receptor

sIL-6R:

Soluble IL-6R

JAK:

Janus kinase

ERK:

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

MEK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

MerTK:

C-mer tyrosine kinase

s-Mer:

Soluble Mer

iRhom2:

Rhomboid protein 2

BDL:

Bile duct ligation

RAAS:

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

SSc:

Systemic sclerosis

PMA:

Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate

C/EBPβ:

Enhancer-binding protein β

RSK1:

Ribosomal S6 kinases 1

CTGF:

Connective tissue growth factor.

Contributor Information

Zhenzhen Ma, Email: mazhenzhendz@163.com.

Qingrui Yang, Email: qryang720@163.com.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Consent

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Suyan Yan, Yaqi Zhao, Yuyu Yang, Baocheng Liu, Wei Xu wrote different sections of the manuscript. Zhenzhen Ma and Qingrui Yang prepared, revised, and wrote the manuscript. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication. The authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Suyan Yan and Yaqi Zhao contribute equally to this work. Zhenzhen Ma and Qingrui Yang shared senior authorship.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth fund project, Grant 82201994); the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (General Program, Grant ZR2022MH016 and Youth fund project, Grant ZR2021QH043); the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Certificate Number: 2023M742170).

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

Supporting Information

Table S1. Family of ADAMs and their functions in the absence of pathology. ADAM: a disintegrin and metalloprotease, CHL1: close homolog of L1, EGF: epidermal growth factor, APP: amyloid precursor protein, CNS: central nervous system, MGC: macrophage-derived giant cell, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, TGF: transforming growth factor, LGI1: anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1, FASL: FAS-ligand, CD40L: CD40-ligand.

9999723.f1.docx (20.4KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Maria A. T. J., Bourgier C., Martinaud C., et al. From Fibrogenesis Towards Fibrosis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Clinical Presentations. La Revue de Médecine Interne . 2020;41(5):325–329. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Talbott H. E., Mascharak S., Griffin M., Wan D. C., Longaker M. T. Wound Healing, Fibroblast Heterogeneity, and Fibrosis. Cell Stem Cell . 2022;29(8):1161–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2022.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zunke F., Rose-John S. The Shedding Protease ADAM17: Physiology and Pathophysiology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)–Molecular Cell Research . 2017;1864(11):2059–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang X., He Q., Zhou C., et al. Prolonged Hypernutrition Impairs TREM2-Dependent Efferocytosis to License Chronic Liver Inflammation and NASH Development. Immunity . 2023;56(1):58–77.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Canault M., Certel K., Schatzberg D., et al. The Lack of ADAM17 Activity During Embryonic Development Causes Hemorrhage and Impairs Vessel Formation. PloS One . 2010;5(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013433.e13433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brocker C. N., Vasiliou V., Nebert D. W. Evolutionary Divergence and Functions of the ADAM and ADAMTS Gene Families. Human Genomics . 2009;4(1):43–55. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-4-1-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Palau V., Pascual J., Soler M. J., Riera M. Role of ADAM17 in Kidney Disease. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology . 2019;317(2):F333–F342. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00625.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheng J., Xue F., Cheng C., et al. ADAM17 Knockdown Mitigates While ADAM17 Overexpression Aggravates Cardiac Fibrosis and Dysfunction Regulating ACE2 Shedding and Myofibroblast Transformation. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.997916.997916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lartey N. L., Valle-Reyes S., Vargas-Robles H., et al. ADAM17/MMP Inhibition Prevents Neutrophilia and Lung Injury in a Mouse Model of COVID-19. Journal of Leukocyte Biology . 2022;111(6):1147–1158. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3COVA0421-195RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Black R. A., Rauch C. T., Kozlosky C. J., et al. A Metalloproteinase Disintegrin that Releases Tumour-Necrosis Factor-Alpha From Cells. Nature . 1997;385(6618):729–733. doi: 10.1038/385729a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sharma D., Singh N. K. Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology . Vol. 184. Springer; 2023. The Biochemistry and Physiology of A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinases (ADAMs and ADAM-TSs) in Human Pathologies. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Edwards D. R., Handsley M. M., Pennington C. J. The ADAM Metalloproteinases. Molecular Aspects of Medicine . 2008;29(5):258–289. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Primakoff P., Myles D. G. The ADAM Gene Family: Surface Proteins With Adhesion and Protease Activity. Trends in Genetics . 2000;16(2):83–87. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01926-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blobel C. P. ADAMs: Key Components in EGFR Signalling and Development. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology . 2005;6(1):32–43. doi: 10.1038/nrm1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moss M. L., Jin S. L., Milla M. E., et al. Cloning of a Disintegrin Metalloproteinase that Processes Precursor Tumour-Necrosis Factor-α. Nature . 1997;385(6618):733–736. doi: 10.1038/385733a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Düsterhöft S., Höbel K., Oldefest M., et al. A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 17 dynamic Interaction Sequence, the Sweet Tooth for the Human Interleukin 6 Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2014;289(23):16336–16348. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.557322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schlöndorff J., Becherer J. D., Blobel C. P. Intracellular Maturation and Localization of the Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha Convertase (TACE) Biochemical Journal . 2000;347:131–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wong E., Maretzky T., Peleg Y., Blobel C. P., Sagi I. The Functional Maturation of A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase (ADAM) 9, 10, and 17 Requires Processing at a Newly Identified Proprotein Convertase (PC) Cleavage Site. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2015;290(19):12135–12146. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.624072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gonzales P. E., Solomon A., Miller A. B., Leesnitzer M. A., Sagi I., Milla M. E. Inhibition of the Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Converting Enzyme by Its Pro Domain. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2004;279(30):31638–31645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401311200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anders A., Gilbert S., Garten W., Postina R., Fahrenholz F. Regulation of the α-Secretase ADAM10 by Its Prodomain and Proprotein Convertases. The FASEB Journal . 2001;15(10):1837–1839. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0007fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van Wart H. E., Birkedal-Hansen H. The Cysteine Switch: A Principle of Regulation of Metalloproteinase Activity With Potential Applicability to the Entire Matrix Metalloproteinase Gene Family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 1990;87(14):5578–5582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pavlenko E., Cabron A.-S., Arnold P., et al. Functional Characterization of Colon Cancer-Associated Mutations in ADAM17: Modifications in the Pro-Domain Interfere With Trafficking and Maturation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2019;20(9) doi: 10.3390/ijms20092198.2198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maskos K., Fernandez-Catalan C., Huber R., et al. Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Converting Enzyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 1998;95(7):3408–3412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Takeda S. ADAM and ADAMTS Family Proteins and Snake Venom Metalloproteinases: A Structural Overview. Toxins . 2016;8(5) doi: 10.3390/toxins8050155.155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Black R. A., Durie F. H., Otten-Evans C., et al. Relaxed Specificity of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPS) and TIMP Insensitivity of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Production Suggest the Major TNF-α Converting Enzyme Is Not an MMP. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications . 1996;225(2):400–405. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Giancotti F. G., Ruoslahti E. Integrin Signaling. Science . 1999;285(5430):1028–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5430.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Trad A., Riese M., Shomali M., et al. The Disintegrin Domain of ADAM17 Antagonises Fibroblast-Carcinoma Cell Interactions, Cell Interactions. International Journal of Oncology . 2013;42:1793–1800. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Düsterhöft S., Jung S., Hung C.-W., et al. Membrane-Proximal Domain of a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease-17 Represents the Putative Molecular Switch of Its Shedding Activity Operated by Protein-disulfide Isomerase. Journal of the American Chemical Society . 2013;135(15):5776–5781. doi: 10.1021/ja400340u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schäfer M., Granato D. C., Krossa S., et al. GRP78 Protects a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 17 Against Protein-Disulfide Isomerase A6 Catalyzed Inactivation. FEBS Letters . 2017;591(21):3567–3587. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lorenzen I., Lokau J., Düsterhöft S., et al. The Membrane-Proximal Domain of A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) Is Responsible for Recognition of the Interleukin-6 Receptor and Interleukin-1 Receptor II. FEBS Letters . 2012;586(8):1093–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Melenhorst W. B., Visser L., Timmer A., et al. ADAM17 Upregulation in Human Renal Disease: A Role in Modulating TGF-α Availability? American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology . 2009;297(3):F781–F790. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.90610.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mulder G. M., Melenhorst W. B. W. H., Celie J. W. A. M., et al. ADAM17 Up-Regulation in Renal Transplant Dysfunction and Non-Transplant-Related Renal Fibrosis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation . 2012;27(5):2114–2122. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sureshbabu A., Muhsin S. A., Choi M. E. TGF-β Signaling in the Kidney: Profibrotic and Protective Effects. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology . 2016;310(7):F596–F606. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00365.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu Y. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Renal Fibrosis. Nature Reviews Nephrology . 2011;7(12):684–696. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang Z., Chen J.-K., Wang S.-W., Moeckel G., Harris R. C. Importance of Functional EGF Receptors in Recovery From Acute Nephrotoxic Injury. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology . 2003;14(12):3147–3154. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000098681.56240.1A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu N., Guo J.-K., Pang M., et al. Genetic or Pharmacologic Blockade of EGFR Inhibits Renal Fibrosis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology . 2012;23(5):854–867. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011050493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tang J., Liu N., Zhuang S. Role of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Acute and Chronic Kidney Injury. Kidney International . 2013;83(5):804–810. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tang J., Liu N., Tolbert E., et al. Sustained Activation of EGFR Triggers Renal Fibrogenesis After Acute Kidney Injury. The American Journal of Pathology . 2013;183(1):160–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kefaloyianni E., Muthu M. L., Kaeppler J., et al. ADAM17 Substrate Release in Proximal Tubule Drives Kidney Fibrosis. JCI Insight . 2016;1(13) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.87023.e87023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Son B., Kim T. R., Park J. H., et al. SAMiRNA Targeting Amphiregulin Alleviate Total-Body-Irradiation-Induced Renal Fibrosis. Radiation Research . 2022;197(5):471–479. doi: 10.1667/RADE-21-00220.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang Q., Wang F., Li X., Ma Z., Jiang D. Quercetin Inhibits the Amphiregulin/EGFR Signaling-Mediated Renal Tubular Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Renal Fibrosis in Obstructive Nephropathy. Phytotherapy Research . 2023;37(1):111–123. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lautrette A., Li S., Alili R., et al. Angiotensin II and EGF Receptor Cross-Talk in Chronic Kidney Diseases: A New Therapeutic Approach. Nature Medicine . 2005;11(8):867–874. doi: 10.1038/nm1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bollée G., Flamant M., Schordan S., et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Promotes Glomerular Injury and Renal Failure in Rapidly Progressive Crescentic Glomerulonephritis. Nature Medicine . 2011;17(10):1242–1250. doi: 10.1038/nm.2491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Su H., Lei C.-T., Zhang C. Interleukin-6 Signaling Pathway and Its Role in Kidney Disease: An Update. Frontiers in Immunology . 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00405.405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kang S., Narazaki M., Metwally H., et al. Historical Overview of the Interleukin-6 Family Cytokine. Journal of Experimental Medicine . 2020;217(5) doi: 10.1084/jem.20190347.217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Luig M., Kluger M. A., Goerke B., et al. Inflammation-Induced IL-6 Functions as a Natural Brake on Macrophages and Limits GN. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology . 2015;26(7):1597–1607. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014060620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schumacher N., Rose-John S. ADAM17 Activity and IL-6 Trans-Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer. Cancers . 2019;11(11) doi: 10.3390/cancers11111736.1736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen W., Yuan H., Cao W., et al. Blocking Interleukin-6 Trans-Signaling Protects Against Renal Fibrosis by Suppressing STAT3 Activation. Theranostics . 2019;9(14):3980–3991. doi: 10.7150/thno.32352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Palau V., Nugraha B., Benito D., et al. Both Specific Endothelial and Proximal Tubular Adam17 Deletion Protect Against Diabetic Nephropathy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(11) doi: 10.3390/ijms22115520.5520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Somineni H. K., Boivin G. P., Elased K. M. Daily Exercise Training Protects Against Albuminuria and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 Shedding in db/db Diabetic Mice. Journal of Endocrinology . 2014;221(2):235–251. doi: 10.1530/JOE-13-0532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shen M., Morton J., Davidge S. T., Kassiri Z. Loss of Smooth Muscle Cell Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 17 Transiently Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension and End-Organ Damage. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology . 2017;103:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Parola M., Pinzani M. Liver Fibrosis: Pathophysiology, Pathogenetic Targets and Clinical Issues. Molecular Aspects of Medicine . 2019;65:37–55. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Peschon J. J., Slack J. L., Reddy P., et al. An Essential Role for Ectodomain Shedding in Mammalian Development. Science . 1998;282(5392):1281–1284. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5392.1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.McMahan R. S., Riehle K. J., Fausto N., Campbell J. S. A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 17 Regulates TNF and TNFR1 Levels in Inflammation and Liver Regeneration in Mice. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology . 2013;305(1):G25–G34. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00326.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Argast G. M., Campbell J. S., Brooling J. T., Fausto N. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation Mediates Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Hepatocyte Replication. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2004;279(33):34530–34536. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405703200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zbodakova O., Chalupsky K., Sarnova L., et al. ADAM10 and ADAM17 Regulate EGFR, c-Met and TNF RI Signalling in Liver Regeneration and Fibrosis. Scientific Reports . 2021;11(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90716-3.11414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dransfield I., Zagórska A., Lew E. D., Michail K., Lemke G. Mer Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Mediates Both Tethering and Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells. Cell Death & Disease . 2015;6(2) doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.18.e1646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Scott R. S., McMahon E. J., Pop S. M., et al. Phagocytosis and Clearance of Apoptotic Cells Is Mediated by MER. Nature . 2001;411(6834):207–211. doi: 10.1038/35075603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Petta S., Valenti L., Marra F., et al. MERTK rs4374383 Polymorphism Affects the Severity of Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Journal of Hepatology . 2016;64(3):682–690. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cavalli M., Pan G., Nord H., et al. Genetic Prevention of Hepatitis C Virus-Induced Liver Fibrosis by Allele-Specific Downregulation of MERTK. Hepatology Research . 2017;47(8):826–830. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sather S., Kenyon K. D., Lefkowitz J. B., et al. A Soluble Form of the Mer Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibits Macrophage Clearance of Apoptotic Cells and Platelet Aggregation. Blood . 2006;109(3):1026–1033. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Thorp E., Vaisar T., Subramanian M., et al. Shedding of the Mer Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Is Mediated by ADAM17 Protein Through a Pathway Involving Reactive Oxygen Species, Protein Kinase Cδ, and p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2011;286(38):33335–33344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.263020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cai B., Dongiovanni P., Corey K. E., et al. Macrophage MerTK Promotes Liver Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Cell Metabolism . 2020;31(2):406–421.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Adrain C., Zettl M., Christova Y., Taylor N., Freeman M. Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling Requires iRhom2 to Promote Trafficking and Activation of TACE. Science . 2012;335(6065):225–228. doi: 10.1126/science.1214400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McIlwain D. R., Lang P. A., Maretzky T., et al. iRhom2 Regulation of TACE Controls TNF-Mediated Protection Against Listeria and Responses to LPS. Science . 2012;335(6065):229–232. doi: 10.1126/science.1214448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Al-Salihi M. A., Lang P. A. iRhom2: An Emerging Adaptor Regulating Immunity and Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2020;21(18) doi: 10.3390/ijms21186570.6570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Düsterhöft S., Babendreyer A., Giese A. A., et al. Status Update on iRhom and ADAM17: It’s Still Complicated. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research . 2019;1866(10):1567–1583. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cavadas M., Oikonomidi I., Gaspar C. J., et al. Phosphorylation of iRhom2 Controls Stimulated Proteolytic Shedding by the Metalloprotease ADAM17/TACE. Cell Reports . 2017;21(3):745–757. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Grieve A. G., Xu H., Künzel U., et al. Phosphorylation of iRhom2 at the Plasma Membrane Controls Mammalian TACE-Dependent Inflammatory and Growth Factor Signalling. Elife . 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/eLife.23968.016.e23968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Li X., Maretzky T., Weskamp G., et al. G, Etal, iRhoms 1 and 2 are Essential Upstream Regulators of ADAM17-Dependent EGFR Signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2015;112(19):6080–6085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505649112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Maney S. K., McIlwain D. R., Polz R., et al. Deletions in the Cytoplasmic Domain of iRhom1 and iRhom2 Promote Shedding of the TNF Receptor by the Protease ADAM17. Science Signaling . 2015;8(401) doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aac5356.ra109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Maretzky T., McIlwain D. R., Issuree P. D. A., et al. PDA, Etal, iRhom2 Controls the Substrate Selectivity of Stimulated ADAM17-Dependent Ectodomain Shedding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2013;110(28):11433–11438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302553110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sundaram B., Behnke K., Belancic A., et al. iRhom2 Inhibits Bile Duct Obstruction-Induced Liver Fibrosis. Science Signaling . 2019;12(605) doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aax1194.eaax1194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bemelmans M. H. A., Gouma D. J., Greve J. W., Buurman W. A. Cytokines Tumor Necrosis Factor and Interleukin–6 in Experimental Biliary Obstruction in Mice. Hepatology . 1992;15(6):1132–1136. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840150626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Alexopoulou L., Kranidioti K., Xanthoulea S., et al. Transmembrane TNF Protects Mutant Mice Against Intracellular Bacterial Infections, Chronic Inflammation and Autoimmunity. European Journal of Immunology . 2006;36(10):2768–2780. doi: 10.1002/eji.200635921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Uysal H., Chavez-Galan L., Vesin D., et al. Transmembrane TNF and Partially TNFR1 Regulate TNFR2 Expression and Control Inflammation in Mycobacterial-Induced Pleurisy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2018;19(7) doi: 10.3390/ijms19071959.1959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jellis C., Martin J., Narula J., Marwick T. H. Assessment of Nonischemic Myocardial Fibrosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2010;56(2):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Longo D. L., Rockey D. C., Bell P. D., Hill J. A. Fibrosis—A Common Pathway to Organ Injury and Failure. New England Journal of Medicine . 2015;372(12):1138–1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1300575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu L., Jin X., Hu C.-F., et al. Amphiregulin Enhances Cardiac Fibrosis and Aggravates Cardiac Dysfunction in Mice With Experimental Myocardial Infarction Partly Through Activating EGFR-Dependent Pathway. Basic Research in Cardiology . 2018;113(2) doi: 10.1007/s00395-018-0669-y.12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Berasain C., Avila M. A. Amphiregulin. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology . 2014;28:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wang X., Shaw S., Amiri F., Eaton D. C., Marrero M. B. Inhibition of the Jak/STAT Signaling Pathway Prevents the High Glucose-Induced Increase in Tgf-Beta and Fibronectin Synthesis in Mesangial Cells. Diabetes . 2002;51(12):3505–3509. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Adekunle A. O., Adzika G. K., Mprah R., et al. Predominance of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Postmenopausal Women: Intra- and Extra-Cardiomyocyte Maladaptive Alterations Scaffolded by Estrogen Deficiency. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology . 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.685996.685996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Peplinski B. S., Houston B. A., Bluemke D. A., et al. Associations of Angiopoietins With Heart Failure Incidence and Severity. Journal of Cardiac Failure . 2021;27(7):786–795. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Touyz R. M. The Role of Angiotensin II in Regulating Vascular Structural and Functional Changes in Hypertension. Current Hypertension Reports . 2003;5(2):155–164. doi: 10.1007/s11906-003-0073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schelling P., Fischer H., Ganten D. Angiotensin and Cell Growth: A Link to Cardiovascular Hypertrophy? Journal of Hypertension . 1991;9(1):3–15. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199109010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Touyz R. M., Tabet F., Schiffrin E. L. Redox-Dependent Signalling by Angiotensin II and Vascular Remodelling in Hypertension. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology . 2003;30(11):860–866. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2003.03930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lijnen P. J., Petrov V. V., Fagard R. H. Angiotensin II-Induced Stimulation of Collagen Secretion and Production in Cardiac Fibroblasts is Mediated via Angiotensin II subtype 1 Receptors. Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System . 2001;2(2):117–122. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2001.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Oudit G. Y., Crackower M. A., Backx P. H., Penninger J. M. The Role of ACE2 in Cardiovascular Physiology. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine . 2003;13(3):93–101. doi: 10.1016/S1050-1738(02)00233-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Danilczyk U., Eriksson U., Crackower M. A., Penninger J. M. A Story of Two ACEs. Journal of Molecular Medicine . 2003;81(4):227–234. doi: 10.1007/s00109-003-0419-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xue F., Cheng J., Liu Y., et al. Cardiomyocyte-Specific Knockout of ADAM17 Ameliorates Left Ventricular Remodeling and Function in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy of Mice. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy . 2022;7(1) doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01054-3.259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Fedak P. W. M., Moravec C. S., McCarthy P. M., et al. Altered Expression of Disintegrin Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitor in Human Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circulation . 2006;113(2):238–245. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.571414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang X., Oka T., Chow F. L., et al. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Converting Enzyme Is a Key Regulator of Agonist-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy and Fibrosis. Hypertension . 2009;54(3):575–582. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.127670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Thannickal V. J., Toews G. B., White E. S., Lynch III J. P., Martinez F. J. Mechanisms of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Annual Review of Medicine . 2004;55(1):395–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nishimi A., Isozaki T., Nishimi S., et al. ADAM-17 is Expressed in the Inflammatory Myopathy and is Involved With Interstitial Lung Disease. Clinical Rheumatology . 2018;37(4):1017–1024. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ge J., Tang L., Mu P., Zhu F., Xie L., Tang Y. Association of ADAM17 Expression Levels in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease. Immunological Investigations . 2020;49(1-2):134–145. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2019.1660367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dijkstra A., Postma D. S., Noordhoek J. A., et al. Expression of ADAMs (“A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease”) in the Human Lung. Virchows Archiv . 2009;454(4):441–449. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0748-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ou S. C., Bai K. J., Cheng W. H., et al. TGF-β Induced CTGF Expression in Human Lung Epithelial Cells Through ERK, ADAM17, RSK1, and C/EBPβ Pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2020;21(23) doi: 10.3390/ijms21239084.9084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chen H.-Y., Lin C.-H., Chen B.-C. ADAM17/EGFR-Dependent ERK Activation Mediates Thrombin-Induced CTGF Expression in Human Lung Fibroblasts. Experimental Cell Research . 2018;370(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Andrews J. P., Marttala J., Macarak E., Rosenbloom J., Uitto J. Keloids: The Paradigm of Skin Fibrosis—Pathomechanisms and Treatment. Matrix Biology . 2016;51:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zhu C., Kim K., Wang X., et al. Hepatocyte Notch Activation Induces Liver Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Science Translational Medicine . 2018;10(468) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat0344.eaat0344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kavian N., Servettaz A., Mongaret C., et al. Targeting ADAM-17/Notch Signaling Abrogates the Development of Systemic Sclerosis in a Murine Model. Arthritis & Rheumatism . 2010;62(11):3477–3487. doi: 10.1002/art.27626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Iso T., Hamamori Y., Kedes L. Notch Signaling in Vascular Development. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology . 2003;23(4):543–553. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000060892.81529.8F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Shi S., Stanley P. Evolutionary Origins of Notch Signaling in Early Development. Cell Cycle . 2006;5(3):274–278. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.3.2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.LaFoya B., Munroe J. A., Mia M. M., et al. Notch: A Multi-Functional Integrating System of Microenvironmental Signals. Developmental Biology . 2016;418(2):227–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Delwig A., Rand M. D. Kuz and TACE Can Activate Notch Independent of Ligand. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences . 2008;65(14):2232–2243. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8127-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Brou C., Logeat F., Gupta N., et al. A Novel Proteolytic Cleavage Involved in Notch Signaling: The Role of the Disintegrin-Metalloprotease TACE. Molecular Cell . 2000;5(2):207–216. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80417-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fukaya S., Matsui Y., Tomaru U., et al. Overexpression of TNF-α-Converting Enzyme in Fibroblasts Augments Dermal Fibrosis After Inflammation. Laboratory Investigation . 2013;93:72–80. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Giudice L. C., Kao L. C. Endometriosis. the Lancet . 2004;364(9447):1789–1799. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ngô C., Chéreau C., Nicco C., Weill B., Chapron C., Batteux F. Reactive Oxygen Species Controls Endometriosis Progression. The American Journal of Pathology . 2009;175(1):225–234. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Leconte M., Nicco C., Ngô C., et al. The mTOR/AKT Inhibitor Temsirolimus Prevents Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis in Mice. The American Journal of Pathology . 2011;179(2):880–889. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Clement P. B. The Pathology of Endometriosis: A Survey of the Many Faces of a Common Disease Emphasizing Diagnostic Pitfalls and Unusual and Newly Appreciated Aspects. Advances in Anatomic Pathology . 2007;14(4):241–260. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3180ca7d7b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wang Y., Herrera A. H., Li Y., Belani K. K., Walcheck B. Regulation of Mature ADAM17 by Redox Agents for L-Selectin Shedding. The Journal of Immunology . 2009;182(4):2449–2457. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Scott A. J., O’Dea K. P., O’Callaghan D., et al. Reactive Oxygen Species and p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Mediate Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Converting Enzyme (TACE/ADAM-17) Activation in Primary Human Monocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2011;286(41):35466–35476. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.277434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.González-Foruria I., Santulli P., Chouzenoux S., Carmona F., Chapron C., Batteux F. Dysregulation of the ADAM17/Notch Signalling Pathways in Endometriosis: From Oxidative Stress to Fibrosis. MHR: Basic science of reproductive medicine . 2017;23(7):488–499. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gax028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kavian N., Marut W., Servettaz A., et al. Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Killing of Activated Fibroblasts by Arsenic Trioxide Ameliorates Fibrosis in a Murine Model of Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism . 2012;64(10):3430–3440. doi: 10.1002/art.34534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Darby I., Skalli O., Gabbiani G. Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin Is Transiently Expressed by Myofibroblasts During Experimental Wound Healing. Laboratory Investigation; A Journal of Technical Methods and Pathology . 1990;63(1):21–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kerbel R. S. Tumor Angiogenesis: Past, Present and the Near Future. Carcinogenesis . 2000;21(3):505–515. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ferrara N., Houck K., Jakeman L., Leung D. W. Molecular and Biological Properties of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Family of Proteins. Endocrine Reviews . 1992;13(1):18–32. doi: 10.1210/edrv-13-1-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Tuccillo C., Romano M., Troiani T., et al. Antitumor Activity of ZD6474, a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-2 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination With SC-236, A Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research . 2005;11(3):1268–1276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Aiello L. P., Avery R. L., Arrigg P. G., et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Ocular Fluid of Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy and Other Retinal Disorders. New England Journal of Medicine . 1994;331(22):1480–1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412013312203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Young R. W. Pathophysiology of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Survey of Ophthalmology . 1987;31(5):291–306. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(87)90115-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Nagineni C. N., Kommineni V. K., William A., Detrick B., Hooks J. J. Regulation of VEGF Expression in Human Retinal Cells by Cytokines: Implications for the Role of Inflammation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Journal of Cellular Physiology . 2012;227(1):116–126. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Swendeman S., Mendelson K., Weskamp G., et al. VEGF-A Stimulates ADAM17-Dependent Shedding of VEGFR2 and Crosstalk Between VEGFR2 and ERK Signaling. Circulation Research . 2008;103(9):916–918. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kim D., Ko H. S., Park G. B., Hur D. Y., Kim Y. S., Yang J. W. Vandetanib and ADAM Inhibitors Synergistically Attenuate the Pathological Migration of EBV-Infected Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells by Regulating the VEGF-Mediated MAPK Pathway. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine . 2017;13(4):1415–1425. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Qian M., Bai S. A., Brogdon B., et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of DPC 333 ((2R)-2-((3R)-3-Amino-3{4-[2-Methyl-4-Quinolinyl) Methoxy] Phenyl}-2-Oxopyrrolidinyl)-N-Hydroxy-4-Methylpentanamide)), A Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Converting Enzyme in Rodents, Dogs, Chimpanzees, and Humans. Drug Metabolism and Disposition: The Biological Fate of Chemicals . 2007;35:1916–1925. doi: 10.1124/dmd.107.015933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Thabet M. M., Huizinga T. W. J. Drug Evaluation: Apratastat, a Novel TACE/MMP Inhibitor for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs (London, England: 2000) . 2006;7(11):1014–1019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Xu C., Gao X., Ren T., et al. The ADAM17 Inhibitor ZLDI-8 Sensitized Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells to Sorafenib Through Notch1-Integrin β-Talk. Pharmacological Research . 2024;203 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107142.107142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Saad M. I., Jenkins B. J. The Protease ADAM17 at the Crossroads of Disease: Revisiting Its Significance in Inflammation, Cancer, and Beyond. The FEBS Journal . 2024;291(1):10–24. doi: 10.1111/febs.16923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bienstein M., Minond D., Schwaneberg U., Davari M. D., Yildiz D. In Silico and Experimental ADAM17 Kinetic Modeling as Basis for Future Screening System for Modulators. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2022;23(3) doi: 10.3390/ijms23031368.1368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Calligaris M., Cuffaro D., Bonelli S., et al. Strategies to Target ADAM17 in Disease: From its Discovery to the iRhom Revolution. Molecules, Feb . 2021;26(4) doi: 10.3390/molecules26040944.944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Nikfarjam Z., Rakhshi R., Zargari F., Aalikhani M., Hasan-Abad A. M., Bazi Z. Repurposing Raltegravir for Reducing Inflammation and Treating Cancer: A Bioinformatics Analysis. Scientific Reports . 2024;14(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82065-8.30349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Calligaris M., Spanò D. P., Bonelli S., et al. iRhom2 Regulates Ectodomain Shedding and Surface Expression of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences . 2024;81(1) doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05201-7.163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Table S1. Family of ADAMs and their functions in the absence of pathology. ADAM: a disintegrin and metalloprotease, CHL1: close homolog of L1, EGF: epidermal growth factor, APP: amyloid precursor protein, CNS: central nervous system, MGC: macrophage-derived giant cell, TNF: tumor necrosis factor, TGF: transforming growth factor, LGI1: anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1, FASL: FAS-ligand, CD40L: CD40-ligand.

9999723.f1.docx (20.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Mediators of Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES