Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 Mar;336:359–376. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014586

Spatial-frequency-specific inhibition in cat striate cortex cells.

K K De Valois, R B Tootell
PMCID: PMC1198974  PMID: 6875912

Abstract

Responses to single and multiple spatial frequency gratings were recorded from eighty-eight cat striate cortex cells. A cell's response to a grating of its optimum spatial frequency (f) was examined both alone and in the presence of gratings of 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2, 3 and 4f, respectively. Some 97% (thirty-seven of thirty-eight) of all simple cells showed significant inhibition of f by one or more of the other frequencies. This inhibition was usually fairly narrowly tuned, with only one or two spatial frequencies producing significant inhibition. Thirty-four simple cells were maximally inhibited by a higher frequency, three by a lower spatial frequency. By far the most common interaction was a considerable inhibition of f by 2f and/or 3f. Of the thirty-seven simple cells showing inhibition to a complex grating, seventeen responded in a manner dependent on the relative phases of the two components. Some showed only inhibition of f; in others, the response to f was either increased or decreased, depending on the relative phase of the two frequencies. The other twenty simple cells showed phase-independent inhibition: the inhibition was of approximately equal amplitude regardless of the relative phase angle of the two grating components. Such phase-independent inhibition cannot be accounted for by linear summation within classical cortical receptive fields. Only eighteen of forty-eight (38%) of the complex cells showed significant inhibition of f by one or more other spatial frequencies. Fourteen of these (29%) were maximally inhibited by a higher spatial frequency, four (8%) by a lower spatial frequency. Inhibitory interactions in complex cells were never dependent on the relative phase of the two component gratings. Six simple cells (16%) and fourteen complex cells (29%) showed significant facilitation of the response to f by one or more (most often lower) spatial frequencies. This enhanced response was greater than the sum of the responses to each component alone, was usually broadly tuned for spatial frequency, and did not depend on the relative phase of the two components. It thus differs from the increased response sometimes seen in a phase-dependent interaction. Some of the observed spatial-frequency-specific interactions are incompatible with either a strictly hierarchical model of cortical architecture or a simple linear filter model of visual cortical processing. The asymmetry of inhibition suggests that it subserves some function other than (or in addition to) the narrowing of spatial frequency tuning functions.

Full text

PDF
359

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albrecht D. G., De Valois R. L. Striate cortex responses to periodic patterns with and without the fundamental harmonics. J Physiol. 1981;319:497–514. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews B. W., Pollen D. A. Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells. J Physiol. 1979 Feb;287:163–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benevento L. A., Creutzfeldt O. D., Kuhnt U. Significance of intracortical inhibition in the visual cortex. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jul 26;238(82):124–126. doi: 10.1038/newbio238124a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):237–260. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell F. W., Cooper G. F., Enroth-Cugell C. The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):223–235. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Valois K. K., De Valois R. L., Yund E. W. Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. J Physiol. 1979 Jun;291:483–505. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Valois K. K. Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity. Vision Res. 1977;17(9):1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Valois K. K., Switkes E. Spatial frequency specific interaction of dot patterns and gratings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):662–665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Valois R. L., Albrecht D. G., Thorell L. G. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res. 1982;22(5):545–559. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90113-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Georgeson M. A., Sullivan G. D. Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(3):627–656. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hammond P., MacKay D. M. Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture. Exp Brain Res. 1977 Nov 24;30(2-3):275–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00237256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heeley D. W. A perceived spatial frequency shift at orientations orthogonal to adapting gratings. Vision Res. 1979;19(11):1229–1236. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90188-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelly D. H. Pattern detection and the two-dimensional fourier transform: flickering checkerboards and chromatic mechanisms. Vision Res. 1976;16(3):277–287. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90111-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kulikowski J. J., Bishop P. O. Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1981;44(4):386–400. doi: 10.1007/BF00238831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levick W. R. Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbits retina. J Physiol. 1967 Feb;188(3):285–307. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maffei L., Fiorentini A. The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. Vision Res. 1973 Jul;13(7):1255–1267. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90201-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Movshon J. A. The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):445–468. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Movshon J. A., Thompson I. D., Tolhurst D. J. Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:79–99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Movshon J. A., Thompson I. D., Tolhurst D. J. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:101–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Movshon J. A., Thompson I. D., Tolhurst D. J. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:53–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pollen D. A., Ronner S. F. Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. Science. 1981 Jun 19;212(4501):1409–1411. doi: 10.1126/science.7233231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodieck R. W. Receptive fields in the cat retina: a new type. Science. 1967 Jul 7;157(3784):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3784.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sillito A. M. Inhibitory mechanisms influencing complex cell orientation selectivity and their modification at high resting discharge levels. J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:33–53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sillito A. M., Kemp J. A., Milson J. A., Berardi N. A re-evaluation of the mechanisms underlying simple cell orientation selectivity. Brain Res. 1980 Aug 4;194(2):517–520. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91234-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Singer W., Tretter F., Cynader M. Organization of cat striate cortex: a correlation of receptive-field properties with afferent and efferent connections. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Sep;38(5):1080–1098. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.5.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stone J., Dreher B. Projection of X- and Y-cells of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to areas 17 and 18 of visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1973 May;36(3):551–567. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.3.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tolhurst D. J. Adaptation to square-wave gratings: inhibition between spatial frequency channels in the human visual system. J Physiol. 1972 Oct;226(1):231–248. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tolhurst D. J., Barfield L. P. Interactions between spatial frequency channels. Vision Res. 1978;18(8):951–958. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES