Abstract
Bayanaul State National Nature Park (BSNNP), which was established in 1985 and is one of the biggest natural parks in the Republic of Kazakhstan, conserves and rehabilitates the natural flora and fauna of the Bayanaul mountain range. This article expands the floristic inventory of BSNNP and identifies the ecological and ethnobotanical importance of the park. The literature revealed that 681 plant species inhabited the BSNNP region but it was hypothesized that the park’s plant diversity was greater than the documented 681 plant species. Following our expedition travels to BSNNP, we extended the flora summary with an addition of 81 new plant species. Now, according to this study, the flora of BSNNP comprises 762 plant species belonging to 335 genera and 81 families. The leading families are Asteraceae Dumort., Poaceae Barnhart, Brassicaceae Burnett, Fabaceae Lindl, Rosaceae Juss., Caryophyllaceae Juss, Lamiaceae Lindl., Apiaceae Lindl., and Scrophulariaceae Juss. They comprise 57.7% of the total plant species in the national park and 58.5% of the total genera. The largest genera are wormwood, sedge, onion, cinquefoil, speedwell, and astragalus, based on which these genera can be considered polymorphic. Moreover, 16 species of endemic plants belonging to 14 genera and 7 families were also reported. The flora is characterized by high biological diversity with the participation of boreal relicts. The largest group among useful species is medicinal plants, represented by 186 species (24.4%) belonging to 83 genera, and 39 families. Our findings enhance the scientific understanding of plant diversity in BSNNP and provide the groundwork for future conservation research.
Keywords: Bayanaul State National Nature Park, new record, endemic plants, systematics, medicinal plants, conservation efforts
1. Introduction
The floristic diversity of Kazakhstan, specifically within its protected areas, is a subject of increasing scientific interest due to its unique ecological characteristics and the urgent need for conservation efforts [1]. BSNNP, situated in the Pavlodar region, serves as an important habitat for various plant species, many of which are endemic and rare [1,2]. Several current studies at the global level, funded by municipalities, regions, ministries, and research institutions, have underscored the importance of documenting plant species to better understand biodiversity and inform conservation strategies, especially in some territories such as Kazakhstan, which are very rich in plant biodiversity. For example, Ref. [3] reported that Kazakhstan’s flora consists of 1406 species from 134 families, with significant representation from families such as Asteraceae and Rosaceae, which are also prevalent in the Bayanaul region [3]. This highlights the urgency of expanding the floristic inventory in regions like Bayanaul, where ecological assessments can reveal both the vulnerabilities and richness of local biodiversity.
The documentation of newly recorded plant species is necessary not only for academic purposes but also for practical conservation efforts [4]: the flora of Central Kazakhstan, including that of national parks, is important in understanding natural and anthropogenic alterations in these ecosystems [5]. The floristic studies conducted in different protected areas, such as the Buiratau State National Park, have employed systematic methodologies, including route reconnaissance and herbarium collections, to compile comprehensive species lists [6,7,8]. Such methodologies are crucial for ensuring that the floristic inventory of Bayanaul State National Nature Park is both accurate and reflective of the current ecological state. Moreover, the significance of biodiversity monitoring is emphasized in the context of human impacts on natural resources. References [9,10] highlight that biodiversity assessments are essential for identifying changes and threats to ecosystems, which is particularly relevant in the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures. In Kazakhstan, the need for updated floristic data is critical, as many regions, including Bayanaul, lack comprehensive studies that reflect current species compositions [11].
BSNNP flora is rich in medicinal plants, used for various disorders from ancient times. The parks have approximately 24.4% medicinal flora out of the total plant species [11]. These species are utilized by local inhabitants for different medicinal purposes, providing remedies for ailments ranging from gastric issues to respiratory infections. This utilization highlights the important role that plants play not only in ecological health but also in traditional heritage and livelihoods. Despite the benefits, the rising pressure on these plant species from tourism and habitat alteration poses a substantial risk to their conservation, requiring enhanced local legislative and administrative efforts to promote sustainable practices [11,12]. This knowledge gap can hinder effective conservation strategies, making the documentation of newly recorded species an urgent priority, also because these include many species useful to humans, such as food and medicine, on which botanists at a global level have started specific research for their valorization [13,14].
A critical issue of our era is the conservation of biological diversity, both in natural and artificial population-established reserves. Kazakhstan, as a contemporary nation, has ratified several UN conventions related to the preservation and judicious utilization of biodiversity since gaining independence, including the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development Declaration, (1992); the Convention on Biological Diversity; the Global Plan of Action for the Conservation and Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture [15,16,17].
Being a unique natural site, Bayanaul State National Nature Park includes different ecosystems with high diversity, including rare relict and endemic species [6]. Some of these plants include Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Betula pendula, Corydalis elegans, Artemisia gurguliana, and Eriophorum vaginatum. Nowadays, it is a huge tourist area with a high number of visitors every year. The preservation of BSNNP is vital, and researchers are nowadays tasked with identifying methods to mitigate the extent of anthropogenic influence on this distinctive natural system [18]. Floristic research in Bayanaul commenced in 1816 with reports by I.P. Shangin’s expedition, published by G. Spassky, and has since progressed through excursions, organized scientific expeditions, project activities, dissertations, and independent studies. During this period, a substantial amount of information regarding the flora of Bayanaul National Park has been documented in the scientific literature, necessitating systematization and research. It was hypothesized that BSNNP’s plant diversity was greater than the documented 681 plant species. The objectives of this study were to (i) document and explore the newly recorded 81 plant species in Bayanaul State National Nature Park, aiding in an updated and inclusive floristic inventory of the region, (ii) identify and categorize the medicinal plants of newly recorded flora and document their traditional uses, and (iii) assess the ecological status of the newly identified species, highlighting the importance of conserving biodiversity in BSNNP.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
Bayanaul State National Nature Park is in the south-east of the Pavlodar region (Bayanaul district), 100 km from the industrialized city of Ekibastuz (Figure 1), on the eastern outskirts of the dry-steppe, Yereymentau-Bayanaul physical–geographical province, among dry steppes with dark chestnut soils of light mechanical composition. The province covers the vast northeastern part of Central Kazakhstan. It is characterized by a predominance of highly dissected hilly terrain with many blocky low mountains such as Bayanaul. The park encompasses a total area of 68,452.8 hectares.
Figure 1.
GIS-generated map of the Bayanaul State National Nature Park (the geo-referenced map is based on the WGS84 (World Geodetic System 1984) coordinate system).
BSNNP presents an exceptional environment characterized by significant climatic variability. The park’s climate is affected by its geographical location, with a mix of continental and steppe climates prevalent in the region. Previous studies show that the climate type in BSNNP is associated closely with a semi-arid climate, which is typical for much of Kazakhstan [19]. The park has long, cold winters and comparatively hot summers. Mean annual temperatures in Bayanaul usually range from approximately −12 °C in January to around 25 °C in July. Such temperature variations are characteristic of continental climates, which face stark seasonal variations [20]. The mean annual precipitation is around 300–400 mm, mostly rain during the late spring and summer months. This precipitation pattern aligns with the regional climate that highlights the increasing variability in rainfall along different areas of Kazakhstan, emphasizing the increased drought conditions attributed to climate change impacts in the larger region [20].
Remarkably, northern Kazakhstan, which comprises parts of BSNNP, has seen significant climatic variations, including a prominent decrease in precipitation (approximately 35% in recent decades) and an average increase in temperature by 1–2 °C, outstripping that of many other northern hemispheric regions. This climatic trend poses a challenge for maintaining biodiversity within BSNNP, as species that rely on certain climatic conditions are at risk due to habitat modification [20,21]. The integration of such data underscores the critical importance of monitoring climate variables in the park, as they naturally affect the flora and fauna diversity within this protected area [21].
2.2. Sampling
The materials and methods for the research was based on the flora of the Bayanaul State National Nature Park, published in the works of [22,23]. According to the previous studies, 681 plant species were reported in BSNNP. In addition, field research was carried out in 2023 on the territory of BSNNP using route reconnaissance and semi-stationary methods [6]). The semi-stationary method is used for continuous monitoring during certain conditions of natural territorial complexes, which are characteristic of it throughout the year. This method consists of studying several stationary points with different ecosystems or conditions at the same time. Regular visits are conducted to each data collection point, including changes and dynamics in environmental conditions, species abundance, and other observations throughout the year.
Initially, we categorized all natural regions in Bayanaul into multiple large clusters. These clusters are located near Bayanaul’s major lakes, i.e., Jasybay, Sabyndykol, Toraygyr, and Birzhankol. Furthermore, we selected various locations distant from lakes and popular hiking trails. A total of 69 sampling points were studied for floristic diversity. The size of each sampling plot was 1000 m2. The study locations were visited in two growing seasons, i.e., April to May and August to September, to record all the plant species of the area [24]. For this work, we created a protocol, which included different data on the area such as plant list, habitat, type of soil, coordinates, altitude, and cover range for various types of vegetation. At each point, we analyzed the floristic composition, considering the zonal variations of the landscape. We examined flora in the lowlands and on the slopes and summits of the mountains.
2.3. Plant Specimens’ Preservation and Identification
Plant species were recorded in the prepared lists in the locality, and their habitat type and other characteristics were also recorded. Those plant species that could not be identified at that time were collected with the help of a cutter, tagged, and placed in shopping bags. The plant specimens were then shade-dried and pressed with a plant pressor. Then, the plant specimens were poisoned using mercuric chloride plus ethyl alcohol solution [25]. Plant specimens were then identified by experts and were confirmed from the Flora of Central Kazakhstan [26]. The Latin names were clarified according to the summary by [27], and World Flora Online (https://www.worldfloraonline.org/ URL accessed on different occasions during the year 2024). We collected the literature data from modern sources; nevertheless, we used old classic works of past periods to trace the dynamics of Bayanaul’s flora. Until now, only 681 plant species had been reported in BSNNP [2,22,28,29].
2.4. Data Processing and Analyses
The plant list was prepared in MS Excel, and all related data were included. Plants’ names, families, and genera were confirmed from online websites, i.e., World Flora Online (https://www.worldfloraonline.org/), and the plant list was prepared. Furthermore, the ethnobotanical uses of plants were assessed and were classified as medicinal, decorative, feed, honey-bearing, soil, forest, phyto reclamation, food, technical, vitamin, essential oils, and insecticidal [30].
Ecological groups of plants were distinguished based on moisture content, which was calculated using a Scholander pressure chamber, one of the most widely used techniques for measuring plant water status. We fixed the pressure in branches and leaves and wrote them down in the protocol [31]. At the same time, we obtained data on climate control from the National Park Office, which included moisture, precipitation, and air pressure. All data were collected and analyzed during the fieldwork. Due to the research object, we determined the next ecological groups. Plant ectomorphs refer to living forms in connection to environmental variables; for terrestrial plants, this is predominantly humidity. Plants were categorized into xerophytes, mesophytes, and hygrophytes. A crucial aspect for plants is the degree of soil salt; vegetation thriving in saline soils was classified as halophyte ecomorph.
3. Results
3.1. Plant Species Diversity in BSNNP
The flora of BSNNP is represented by 762 species belonging to 335 genera and 81 families (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Of the total plant species, 681 were previously reported from the park, while we reported 81 new species from BSNNP. Equisetopsida (Horsetails) were represented by 5 species, Polypodiopsida (Ferns) by 12 species, Pinopsida (Cone-bearing trees) by 2 species, Gnetopsida (Gnetovye) by 2 species, Liliopsida (Monocots) by 142 species, and Magnoliopsida (Dicotyledons) were represented by 599 plant species (Table 1).
Table 1.
Taxonomic characteristics of plants of Bayanaul State National Nature Park.
| Taxon Name | No. of Families, pcs. | No. of Genera, pcs | No. of Species, pcs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equisetopsida—Horsetails | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Polypodiopsida—Ferns | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| Pinopsida—Cone-bearing trees | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Gnetopsida—Gnetovye | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Liliopsida—Monocots | 14 | 54 | 142 |
| Magnoliopsida—Dicotyledons | 56 | 267 | 599 |
3.2. Dominant Plant Families and Genera
The predominant families include Asteraceae Dumort. (124 species), Poaceae Barnhart (66 species), Brassicaceae Burnett (35 species), Fabaceae Lindl (49 species), Rosaceae Juss. (37 species), Caryophyllaceae Juss. (31 species), Lamiaceae Lindl. (29 species), Apiaceae Lindl. (26 species), Scrophulariaceae (26 species), and Boraginaceae Juss., (17 species (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1). These families constitute 57.7% of the total species and 58.5% of the overall genera in Bayanaul State National Nature Park.
Figure 2.
Leading plant families with the number of genera and species found at BSNNP.
The predominant genera include wormwood (25 species), sedge (18 species), onion (12 species), astragalus (14 species), cinquefoil (11 species), speedwell (11 species), and willow (10 species), indicating that the data genera can be classified as polymorphic. The genera Poa, Calamagrostis, and Polygonum each encompass 9 species (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 3.
Spectrum of leading genera of plants in the Bayanaul State National Nature Park (number of species in the genus, pcs.).
The vegetation of Bayanaul State National Nature Park has significant ecological diversity, featuring boreal relics such as Neottianthe cucullata L. Schlechter, Ramischia secunda (L.) Garcke, and Dactylorhiza incarnate L.
3.3. Habitat Types Based on Water Availability
All the plant species are classified as xerophytes, mesophytes, and hygrophytes. Plant ecomorphs refer to living forms in connection to environmental variables. For terrestrial plants, this is predominantly humidity. A crucial aspect for plants is the degree of soil salt. Vegetation thriving in saline soils is classified as halophyte ecomorph. The primary suite of ecomorphs comprises mesophytes, encompassing 303 species, representing 58.5%. The xerophyte suite comprises 187 species, accounting for 36.1% of the total. The assemblage of hygrophytes comprises merely 27 species (5.2%), with only 1 species classified as a typical halophyte (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Bayanaul ecomorph types and their percentage.
3.4. Ethnobotanical Uses of Plant Species of BSNNP
The examination of flora within Bayanaul State National Nature Park revealed that 719 plant species were economically significant (Table 2). The predominant category of economically important species is the medicinal plants with 186 species (24.4%) belonging to 83 genera and 39 families. Ornamental plants occupy second place in species diversity, comprising 126 species belonging to 61 genera and 34 families. The highest diversity of fodder plant species is found within the Poaceae, Fabaceae, and Asteraceae. The most useful forage plants are species from the genera Stipa, Poa, Festuca, Bromus, Glycyrrhiza, Astragalus, Trifolium, Medicago, Onobrychis, and Vicia. These plants can function as forage for cattle and wildlife, in addition to being utilized for hay production.
Table 2.
Groups of economically valuable plant species on the territory of BSNNP.
| Economic Groups | Number of Species | % | Number of Births | % | Number of Families | % | Abundant Plant Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicinal | 186 | 24.4 | 83 | 24.8 | 39 | 48.1 | Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Betula pendula, Urtica dioica, Padus racemosa, Taraxacum officinale, Thymus serpyllum, and Solidago virgo-aurea, |
| Decorative | 126 | 16.5 | 61 | 18.2 | 34 | 42.0 | Gypsophila altissima, Gypsophila muralis, Iris pseudacorusm Veronica spicata, Pteridium aquilina, Lavathera turinginea, and Fritillaria sp. |
| Feed | 120 | 15.7 | 24 | 7.2 | 15 | 18.5 | Leymus akmolensis, Festuca sulcata, Agropyron pectinatum, Vicia sativa, Medicago falcata, Medicago sativa, Trifolium repens, and Bromus inermis. |
| Honey-bearing | 81 | 10.6 | 26 | 7.8 | 14 | 17.3 | Melilotus officinalis, Frangula alnus, Dracocephalus thymiflorum, Salvia spepposa, Eleagnus angustifolia, Trifolium pratense, Chamerion angusrifolia, and Caragana frutex. |
| Soil, forest, phyto reclamation | 60 | 7.9 | 37 | 11.0 | 22 | 27.2 | Pinus sylvestris, Populus balsamifera, Salix alba, Alnus glutinosa, and Glycyrrhiza uralensis. |
| Food | 54 | 7.1 | 11 | 3.3 | 9 | 11.1 | Grossularia sp., Ribes niger, Hippophae rhamnoides, Cirsium esculentum, Fragaria viridis, Rubus caesias, and Rubus idaeas. |
| Technical | 45 | 5.9 | 16 | 4.8 | 12 | 14.8 | Typha latifolia, Salix alba, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Betula pendula, Pinus sylvestris, Lythrum salicaria, and Chamerion angusrifolia. |
| Vitamin | 22 | 2.9 | 5 | 1.5 | 4 | 4.9 | Rosa canina, Rosa cinnamomea, Sorbus sibirica, and Ribes niger. |
| Essential oilseeds | 21 | 2.8 | 14 | 4.2 | 5 | 6.2 | Thymus serpyllum, Ziziphora bungeana, Patrinia intermedia, Nepeta pannonica, and Nepeta ucranica. |
| Insecticidal | 4 | 0.5 | 4 | 1.2 | 3 | 3.7 | Pedicularis palustris, Anabasis aphylla, Tanacetum vulgare, and Artemisia absinthium. |
3.5. Newly Recorded Plant Species and Their Habitat
Based on the results of our expedition trips to Bayanaul National Park, we supplemented the flora summary with the addition of 81 plant species. The newly recorded plant species, scientific names, families, vernacular names, and habitats are given in Table 3.
Table 3.
List of 81 new recorded plant species of high conservation interest at BSNNP.
| No. | Plants | Family | Vernacular Name | Habitat and Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pteridium aquilinum | Dennstaedtiaceae | Common bracken | The most common background species of large ferns. |
| 2 | Equisetum arvense | Equisetaceae | Moore’s horsetail | Damp and open woodlands, pastures, roadsides, disturbed areas, and near the edge of streams. |
| 3 | Ephedra intermedia | Middle ephedra | Deserts, grasslands, floodlands and river valleys, slopes and cliffs, and sandy beaches. | |
| 4 | Aquilegia vulgaris | Ephedraceae | Creeping buttercup | Wild species from the cultivated flora. |
| 5 | Ranunculus repens | Ranunculaceae | Creeping buttercup | Very common in damp places, ditches, and flooded areas. |
| 6 | Thalictrum aquilegifolia | Ranunculaceae | Basil foliage | Native range extends through Europe and temperate Asia, with a naturalized distribution in North America limited to New York and Ontario. |
| 7 | Gypsophila perfoliata | Caryophyllaceae | perfoliate baby’s-breath | Cultivated areas of gardens and parks. |
| 8 | Stellaria holostea | Caryophyllaceae | Chickweed | Widely distributed in broad-leaved and mixed forests. |
| 9 | Atriplex nitens | Chenopodiaceae | Quinoa | Adapted to dry environments with salty soils. |
| 10 | Salicornia europaea | Amaranthaceae | European saltwort | Grows in various zones of intertidal salt marshes, on beaches, and among mangroves. |
| 11 | Camphorosma monspeliaca | Amaranthaceae | Campharosma monspeliaca | Found in salt marshes and salty soils. Grows scattered or in groups. |
| 12 | Halocnemum strobilaceum | Amaranthaceae | Sarsazan knobby | A hyper-halophyte capable of growing alongside glasswort in conditions of extreme soil salinity. |
| 13 | Kalidium foliatum | Amaranthaceae | Potassium foliatum | Grow in saline mudflats, on alkaline soils, at margins of alluvial fans, and the shores of salt lakes. |
| 14 | Anabasis aphylla | Amaranthaceae | Leafless barnacle, itssigek | A many-branched shrub usually found growing in alluvial fans and dune swales. |
| 15 | Limonium leptophyllum | Plumbaginaceae | Elegant Kermek | The native range of this species is Central Asia. It grows primarily in the temperate biome. |
| 16 | Populus nigra | Salicaceae | Black poplar | Spreads mainly from plantings in populated and recreation areas. |
| 17 | Populus alba | Salicaceae | White poplar | Spreads from plantings in populated areas. |
| 18 | Populus canescens | Salicaceae | Gray poplar | Natural hybrid between aspen and white poplar, polymorphic and widespread, also used in decorative landscaping. |
| 19 | Salix viminalis | Salicaceae | Basket willow | It is a shrub or tree and grows primarily in the temperate biome. |
| 20 | Ulmus pinnato-ramosa | Ulmaceae | Pinnate elm | It is the last tree species encountered in the semi-desert regions of Central Asia. |
| 21 | Urtica cannabina | Urticaceae | Hemp nettle | Weed species in the northern regions spread from the south, mainly through a network of settlements and through accidental introduction. |
| 22 | Euphorbia acuta | Euphorbiaceae | Acute spurge | Found in arid and littoral conditions, they are typical xero- and thermophytes. Few species enter the tropical zone, and very few of them enter cold regions. |
| 23 | Sedum purpurea | Crassulaceae | Purple sedum | Typically found in dry habitats with sufficient bright sunlight. |
| 24 | Sedum acre | Crassulaceae | Caustic sedum | Typically found in dry habitats with sufficient bright sunlight. |
| 25 | Ribes rubrum | Crassulaceae | Red currant | Wild and wild cultivated forms. |
| 26 | Grossularia reclinata | Grossulariaceae | Rejected gooseberry, cultivated | Bred everywhere, runs wild, goes into foothill forests and grows together with native species. |
| 27 | Syringa vulgaris | Oleaceae | Common lilac | Cultivated around all populated areas. |
| 28 | Fraxinus excelsior | Oleaceae | Tall ash | Spreads from artificial plantings |
| 29 | Pentaphylloides fruticosa | Rosaceae | Kuril bush tea | It is a subshrub or shrub and grows primarily in the temperate biome. |
| 30 | Pentaphylloides parviflora | Rosaceae | Small-flowered Kuril tea | It is a subshrub or shrub and grows primarily in the temperate biome. |
| 31 | Astragalus overiformis | Fabaceae | Grow on the edges and clearings of larch, pine, birch forests, in mountain fir and spruce forests, steppes. | |
| 32 | Astragalus lanuginosus | Fabaceae | Woolly astragalus | Grow on sands in light pine forests, as well as along riverbanks, on railway embankments, and along roadsides. |
| 33 | Astragalus arenarius | Fabaceae | Sandy astragalus | Grow on sands in light pine forests, as well as along riverbanks, on railway embankments, along roadsides. |
| 34 | Astragalus glycyphillus | Fabaceae | Astragalus licorice | Fresh, moist, slightly acidic, humus-rich, loamy and sandy loam soils. |
| 35 | Glycyrrhiza glabra | Fabaceae | Naked licorice | Grow in the valleys and floodplains of steppe and semi-desert rivers, on sand and shell ridges in the coastal zone, in the steppes and semi-deserts, in meadows. |
| 36 | Hedysarym neglectum | Fabaceae | Forgotten penny Weed |
Grow in alpine and subalpine meadows, on grassy and rocky slopes, in juniper forests and on river pebbles. |
| 37 | Lathyrus sylvestris | Fabaceae | Forest chin | Found on forest edges and bush thickets. |
| 38 | Lathyrus tuberosa | Fabaceae | Chin nodule | Partly from the culture—perennial forms of sweet pea. |
| 39 | Medicago sativa | Fabaceae | Alfalfa | Grassy slopes, steppes, pastures, forest edges, bushes, gravel, river valleys, as a weed, in crops and around them. |
| 40 | Caragana arborescens | Fabaceae | Tree caragana | Partly spreads from artificial plantings |
| 41 | Polygala sibirica | Polygalaceae | Siberian source | Loose, well-permeable and water-permeable sandy soil. Heliophyte, drought-resistant. |
| 42 | Erodium cicutarium | Geraniaceae | Common stork | Found in fields, vegetable gardens, forest clearings, wastelands, and weedy places. |
| 43 | Rhamnea frangula | Geraniaceae | Brittle buckthorn | |
| 44 | Eleagnus angustifolia | Elaeagnaceae | Eleven angustifolia | It is undemanding to soils; it tolerates significant soil salinity and grows successfully on chestnut-solonetz, dark chestnut, and light chestnut soils. |
| 45 | Eleagnus argentea | Elaeagnaceae | Silver oleaster | It is undemanding to soils; it tolerates significant soil salinity and grows successfully on chestnut-solonetz, dark chestnut, and light chestnut soils. |
| 46 | Hippophae rhamnoides | Elaeagnaceae | Sea buckthorn | Sea buckthorn thickets are usually found in river floodplains and lake shores. |
| 47 | Heracleum sosnowskii | Umbelliferae | Sosnowski’s hogweed | Distributed everywhere along streams; unlike Siberian hogweed, it is not poisonous, does not have a burning effect, and serves as an edible plant. |
| 48 | Pimpinella saxigraga | Apiaceae | Saxifraga | Grow in meadows, in meadow steppes, among bushes, on forest edges, in sparse deciduous and pine forests, on hills. |
| 49 | Laser trilobium | Apiaceae | Lives in forests, forest edges, clearings, on limestone outcrops, on marls. | |
| 50 | Selinum carvifolia | Umbelliferae | Gircha caraway | In meadows, on forest edges, under the canopy of damp broad-leaved, mixed, birch and coniferous trees, and in their clearings. |
| 51 | Sium latifolium | Umbelliferae | Along the banks of swamps, rivers, lakes, in peat pits and along the edges of reed-covered ditches. | |
| 52 | Sambucus racemosa | Viburnaceae | Common elderberry | Spreads from artificial plantings. |
| 53 | Symphoricarpos albus | Caprifoliaceae | White snowberry | Spreads from artificial plantings in the vicinity of populated areas. |
| 54 | Scabiosa scabiosoides | Dipsacaceae | Common scabiosa | Across steppes and steppe meadows, pine forests, and mountain slopes. |
| 55 | Valeriana officinalis | Caprifoliaceae | Valerian | Along the banks of reservoirs, among thickets of bushes, in clearings and forest edges. |
| 56 | Asperula odorata | Rubiaceae | Woodruff | Grows in mixed and broadleaf forests, as well as in the forest-steppe zone and on riverine sands. |
| 57 | Centaurlum umbellatum | Gentianaceae | Centaury | Grow damp meadows, light forest edges, and between bushes. |
| 58 | Convolvulus fruticosus | Convolvulaceae | Shrub bindweed | Grows singly, like a weed, on successional slopes and wastelands. |
| 59 | Symphytum officinale | Boraginaceae | Comfrey | Spreads from artificial plantings, found in wastelands along with black root. |
| 60 | Mertensia pallasi | Boraginaceae | Endemic to Bayanaul, occasionally observed in floodplain and floodplain biotopes. | |
| 61 | Scrophularia nodosa | Scrophulariaceae | Coniferous and mixed forests, among shrubs, on grass-forb, damp and dry meadows. | |
| 62 | Pedicularis palustris | Orobanchaceae | Swamp grass | Wetlands, swamps, fens, marshes, wet meadows, and ditches. |
| 63 | Plantago cornuti | Plantaginaceae | Cornut’s plantain | Common inhabitant of salt marsh meadows. |
| 64 | Leonurus cardiaca | Lamiaceae | Motherwort | Becomes a weed flora from settlements where it was grown as a medicinal plant. |
| 65 | Nepeta cataria | Lamiaceae | Catnip | Roadsides, in vacant fields, waste ground, rubbish dumps, and other disturbed areas. |
| 66 | Thymus serpyllum | Lamiaceae | Creeping thyme | Sandy-soiled heaths, rocky outcrops, hills, banks, roadsides, and riverside sand banks. |
| 67 | Tilia cordata | Malvaceae | Heart-leaved linden | Common in the regional center and rural settlements, where it has taken root well in artificial plantings and is spread by birds. |
| 68 | Artemisia procera | Asteraceae | High wormwood | Inhabitant of dry meadows in steppe areas. |
| 69 | Matricaria matricarioides | Asteraceae | Chamomile without tongue | Blooming on footpaths, roadsides, and similar places in spring and early summer. |
| 70 | Scorzonera orientalis | Asteraceae | Eastern Kozelets | Grows on steppes, outcrops of various rocks, less often in pine forests, sometimes on sandy cliffs of riverside terraces. |
| 71 | Potamogeton natans | Potamogetonaceae | Floating pondweed | Native to quiet or slow-flowing freshwater habitats. |
| 72 | Potamogeton crispus | Potamogetonaceae | Curly pondweed | Native to quiet or slow-flowing freshwater habitats. |
| 73 | Potamogeton lucens | Potamogetonaceae | Shiny pondweed | Native to quiet or slow-flowing freshwater habitats. |
| 74 | Potamogeton acutifolius | Potamogetonaceae | Norway pondweed | Native to quiet or slow-flowing freshwater habitats. |
| 75 | Scheichzeria palustris | Scheuchzeriaceae | Swamp Scheichzeria | Grows on relict sphagnum bogs of sandy meadow terraces, in river valleys. |
| 76 | Iris pseudacorus | Iridaceae | Iris pseudacorus | Common in wetlands, where it tolerates submersion, low pH, and anoxic soils. |
| 77 | Iris biglimus | Iridaceae | Common in wetlands, where it tolerates submersion, low pH, and anoxic soils. | |
| 78 | Gagea lutea | Liliaceae | Yellow goose onion | Broad-leaf woodlands, hedgerows, limestone pavements, pastures, and riverbanks. |
| 79 | Asparagus setifora | Asparagaceae | Bristle asparagus | Sources differ as to the plant’s native range but generally include most of Europe and western temperate Asia. |
| 80 | Sparganum emersum | Typhaceae | Pop-up hedgehog | Aquatic plant, growing in shallow water bodies. |
| 81 | Leymus akmolensis | Poaceae | Akmola hairweed | Found in saline meadows, salt marshes, gravel beds, and along roads. |
4. Discussion
Bayanaul State National Nature Park is classified as a gradual forest vegetation province, specifically within the dry steppe pine forest region of the Bayano-Karkaraly low mountains and the Bayanaul subdistrict of low mountain pine forests. The Bayanaul National Natural Park is situated in a compact mountain-steppe massif with distinct vertical zonation, predominantly including pine forests and a strongly continental climate. The soil inside BSNNP is correlated with vertical zoning influenced by the hilly topography. Mountain forest soil under pine woods and mountain black soils are present here. The topography of Bayanaul State National Park is markedly varied and extensively fragmented. The primary orographic features consist of low mountains and tiny hills characterized by sharp, irregular profiles with numerous rocky outcrops, interspersed with intermountain valleys. Relative elevations vary from 100 to 1027 m. Certain mountain ranges and rugged heights are classified as part of the middle mountains (Bayanaul Mountains—1027 m, Alabassky Mountains—700 m). The minor hills are in rows, with elevations ranging from 350 to 500 m. A dense network of narrow gorges and ravines characterizes the region’s landscape. The Bayanaul Mountains, by their origin, are classified within the erosion-tectonic relief group. The highest elevation attains 1027 m. The ecological dynamics of the park are due to the diverse topography, such as low mountains, hills, and intermountain valleys. The elevation ranges from 100 to 1027 m, with various microclimates and soil types, which promote the rich plant diversity observed. Due to the topography of the park, the composition of the soil is influenced by pine woods, for instance in the mountains, black soil, which ensures the availability of nutrients for the further support of various plant communities [32].
The results from our work on plant diversity in this area show a rich array of flora, with a total of 762 plant species identified, including 81 new species. This substantial addition to the present knowledge emphasizes the value of ongoing botanical surveys in comprehending and preserving biodiversity, given the need for comprehensive species recording in conservation efforts [33,34,35]. The predominance of certain families, especially Asteraceae (124 species) and Poaceae (66 species), represents wider ecological patterns observed in temperate regions, where these families are often well-signified owing to their adaptability and ecological flexibility. The ecosystem functions are mainly maintained by the diversity of species in these families by adopting the prevailing microclimatic variations [36]. Previous studies also identified that some of the given plant families were dominant in the study area. The dominant forest-forming species of the given families are Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), which constitutes 75% of the entire wooded area. The residual forested area comprises primarily birch (Betula pendula) at 15.7%, aspen (Populus tremula) at 3%, and black alder (Alnus glutinosa) at 2.3%. Tree species in the park comprise 98% of the wooded area, while shrubs (such as Spiraea crenata, S. hypericifolia, Rosa pisiformis, Juniperus sabina, etc.) constitute 2%. The authors of [6] established the findings of the investigation into the species composition of Indigenous flora in the Bayanaul Mountains. The findings indicated that 16 species from 14 genera and seven families thrive in this region. Most of the species are perennial herbaceous plants and are classified as xerophytes according to their ecological associations. Six species of vascular plants were newly identified in Central Kazakhstan (Centaurea pseudomaculosa Dobrocz., Cerinthe minor L., Equisetum × moorei Newm., Juniperus sibirica Burgsd., Lappula occultata M. Pop., Viola mirabilis L.) and eight rare species in the region (Arctium leiospermum Juz. et Ye.V. Serg., Equisetum scirpoides Michx., Geranium robertianum L., Linum corymbulosum Rchb., Poa remota Forsell., Ranunculus auricomus L., Silene dichotoma Ehrh., Veronica prostrata L.) [2]. Another research project and analysis of the flora revealed that 542 species of vascular plants from 282 genera and 71 families inhabited the Ulytau Mountains (Central Kazakhstan). The predominant taxonomic families include Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Rosaceae, Brassicaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Boraginaceae, Lamiaceae, Polygonaceae, and Apiaceae. The ecological niche available within the park is determined by the diversity of genera, including wormwood (25 species) and sedge (18 species). Different environmental conditions influence these genera, advocating that the park’s habitats could provide a range of microenvironments favorable to plant growth [37,38,39].
The diversity of plants within BSNNP and their ethnobotanical uses play a key role in local economies and cultural practices. Among the recognized species, medicinal plants constitute the major category, with 186 species (24.4%) belonging to 83 genera and 39 families, highlighting the reliance of local communities on these plants for health and wellness [40]. Ornamental plants are the second most diverse group, with 126 species from 61 genera and 34 families, indicating the aesthetic and cultural values linked with local flora [41]. Additionally, the Poaceae, Fabaceae, and Asteraceae families contain the highest diversity of fodder plant species, specifically in the genera such as Stipa, Poa, and Glycyrrhiza. They provide important forage for livestock and wildlife and are a source of hay production [42]. In addition to enhancing the livelihoods of local communities, this diverse use of plant species determines how important it is to conserve plant biodiversity for cultural heritage and sustainable development [43]. The incorporation of traditional knowledge concerning these plants is critical for their conservation and balanced use, as it promotes an innate understanding of their ecological and economic importance [44,45,46]. Overall, the ethnobotanical richness of BSNNP demonstrates the relationship between humans and plants, reflecting the need for continued research work and conservation strategies to protect these precious resources and propagate further via various development strategies [47,48,49,50]. The outcomes of this study not only influence scientific understanding of plant diversity in BSNNP while also serving as a ground for future research directed at conserving this dynamic natural resource. Preserving the ecological integrity of the park and sustaining the lives of the local communities that depend on its biodiversity requires continued exploration and documentation of plant species.
5. Conclusions
This study concludes that studying plant diversity within Bayanaul State National Nature Park enhanced our understanding by identifying 762 species, including 81 new records of conservation interests. The findings confirm the ecological significance of the park’s varied topography, soil types, and climatic conditions in supporting a rich tapestry of flora, especially medicinal, ornamental, and fodder plants. The diversity and the ethnobotanical uses of BSNNP flora play a critical role in local livelihoods and cultural practices. Further research, sustainable use, and conservation efforts are essential to protect this biodiversity. Sustainable management of plant resources for upcoming generations while maintaining the park’s ecological integrity is also required. It is recommended to conduct a detailed disease-based ethnobotanical study on the plant species present in the park. Furthermore, a detailed conservation assessment of the endemic and rare plant species is necessary for the monitoring of proper conservation measures.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants14071119/s1, Table S1: Detail floristic list of the Bayanaul State National Nature Park (BSNNP), Kazakhstan.
Author Contributions
Z.B.: writing—original draft; T.N.: methodology; K.M. and S.D.: investigation, validation; A.G.: formal analysis, visualization; S.M.K.: conceptualization and analyses; F.M.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.
Funding Statement
The article was prepared within the framework of a grant project funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, IRN AP19677807.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Simonyan G.S., Sarsekova D.N. Analysis of Ecological State of Wood and Shrub Vegetation in Armenia and Kazakhstan by the Armenian Index of Environmental Quality. Ukonf Publisher; Tambov, Russia: 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kubentayev S.A., Alibekov D.T., Perezhogin Y.V., Lazkov G.A., Kupriyanov A.N., Ebel A.L., Izbastina K.S., Borodulina O.V., Kubentayeva B.B. Revised checklist of endemic vascular plants of Kazakhstan. PhytoKeys. 2024;238:241. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.238.114475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grudzinskaya L., Gemejiyeva N., Karzhaubekova Z., Nelina N. Botanical Coverage of the Leading Families of Medicinal Flora of Kazakhstan. EDP Sciences; Les Ulis, France: 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bhattacharyya A., Ranhotra P.S., Shah S.K. Temporal and spatial variations of late pleistocene-holocene climate of the western himalaya based on pollen records and their implications to monsoon dynamics. J. Geol. Soc. India. 2006;68:507. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keukenov Y.B., Dzhanaleeva G. Use of biological resources of the Karkaraly Mountains. Vestn. KazNRTU. 2021;5:10–17. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kali A., Kenzhina K.D., Turlybekova G., Tulegenova S.E., Dukenbayeva A., Rustemova A., Beisenova R. Protected, Rare and Medicinal Plant Species of the Buiratau State National Natural Park (Republic of Kazakhstan) Preprints. 2023 doi: 10.20944/preprints202309.0226.v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Manan F., Haq Z.U., Kamran S., Iqbal M. Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainability in Asia: Volume 2: Prospects and Challenges in South and Middle Asia. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2022. Ecological Evaluation of Parrotiopsis jacquemontiana in the Hindu Kush and Himalayan Ranges of Pakistan and Its Conservation Status; pp. 181–197. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Asmat S., Khan S.M., Ahmad Z., Manan F., Noor R., Zaman I.U., Abdullah . Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainability in Asia: Volume 2: Prospects and Challenges in South and Middle Asia. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2022. Role of chitral gol national park in maintaining and conserving plant diversity of the region; pp. 199–217. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Manan F., Khan S.M., Ahmad Z., Kamran S., Haq Z.U., Abid F., Iqbal M., Abdullah Environmental determinants of plant associations and evaluation of the conservation status of Parrotiopsis jacquemontiana in Dir, the Hindu Kush Range of Mountains. Trop. Ecol. 2020;61:509–526. doi: 10.1007/s42965-020-00109-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iqbal M., Khan S.M., Ahmad Z., Hussain M., Shah S.N., Kamran S., Manan F., Haq Z.U., Ullah S. Vegetation classification of the margalla foothills, islamabad under the influence of edaphic factors and anthropogenic activities using modern ecological tools. Pak. J. Bot. 2021;53:1831–1843. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ishmuratova M., Shashakov M., Tleukenova S. Potential Application of GBIF Platform for Flora Inventory of Karaganda Region. EDP Sciences; Les Ulis, France: 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 12.ul Haq Z., Rasheed S., Manan F., Kamran S., Shah S.A., Ahmad H. Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainability in Asia: Volume 2: Prospects and Challenges in South and Middle Asia. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2022. Phytosociological Studies, Economic Value, and Sustainable Use of Alnus nitida: A Monophyletic Species of the Western Himalayas and Hindu Kush Region of the Sino-Japanese Belt of Pakistan; pp. 287–307. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mahmoud K.B., Abdelkefi F., Mezzapesa G.N., Perrino E.V. Nutritional value and functional properties of an underexploited Tunisian wild beet (Beta macrocarpa Guss.) in relation to soil characteristics. Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2024;9:705–720. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Perrino E.V., Wagensommer R.P., Mezzapesa G.N., Trani A. Stachys italica Mill.: Synecology, functional compounds and potential use of an Italian endemic taxon. Planta. 2024;260:138. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04571-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Glowka L., Burhenne-Guilmin F., Synge H., McNeely J.A., Gündling L. A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity. IUCN; Gland, Switzerland: 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rao V.R., Quek P., Mal B., Zhou M. Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Use in China. IPGRI; Beijing, China: 1999. Conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources; p. 9. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ho M.D. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Congressional Research Service; Washington, DC, USA: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khamzina Z.A., Buribayev Y.A., Turlykhankyzy K., Kuttygalieva A.R., Kubeyeva Z.T. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management. J. Environ. Account. Manag. 2022;10:361–374. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhumadina S., Abilova S., Bulekbayeva L., Tarasovskaya N., Zhumadilov B. Anthropogenic Impact on the Components of the Forest Ecosystem: On the Example of the Bayanaul State National Nature Park. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2023;32:3937–3945. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu Y., Li S., Zhao Q., Wen B., Gasparrini A., Tong S., Overcenco A., Urban A., Schneider A., Entezari A. Global, regional, and national burden of mortality associated with short-term temperature variability from 2000–19: A three-stage modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health. 2022;6:e410–e421. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00073-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ganiev B.N., Azimov N.N., Kholmatov B.R. A comparative study of spring avifauna in natural biotopes and agricultural landscapes of the Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. Acta Biol. Sib. 2024;10:1103–1120. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gorchakovsky P.L. Lesnye Oazisy Kazakhskoho Melkosopochnika [Forest Oases of the Kazakh Small Mountains] Nauka; Moscow, Russia: 1987. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kupriyanov A.N., Khrustaleva I.A., Akmullayeva A.S. List of plants of Bajanaul National park (Central Kazakhstan) Bot. Issled. Sib. Kazakhstana [Bot. Investig. Sib. Kazakhstan] 2011;17:95–114. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kirby K.J., Bines T., Burn A., Mackintosh J., Pitkin P., Smith I. Seasonal and observer differences in vascular plant records from British woodlands. J. Ecol. 1986;74:123–131. doi: 10.2307/2260353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Manan F., Khan S.M., Muhammad Z., Ahmad Z., Abdullah A., Rahman A.u., Han H., Ariza-Montes A., Contreras-Barraza N., Raposo A. Floristic composition, biological spectrum, and phytogeographic distribution of the Bin Dara Dir, in the western boundary of Pakistan. Front. For. Glob. Change. 2022;5:1019139. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.1019139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pavlov N.V. Flora of Central Kazakhstan, 1. Volume 3. Publication of the People’s Commissariat of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Almaty, Kazakhstan: 1928. p. 61. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cherepanov S.K. Vascular Plants of Russia and Neighboring States. Peace and Family; St. Petersburg, Russia: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Assylbekova G., Zhumabekova B., Klimenko M., Khan S.M., Aubakirova K. Technogenic effects on scots pine generative organs: A cross-country study. Acta Biol. Sib. 2025;15:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kadenova A.B., Kamkin V.A., Erzhanov N.T., Kamkina E.V. Flora and Vegetation of the Bayanaul State National Nature Park Kereku, Pavlodar. Bio. Sci. Kazakakh. 2008;3:8–20. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tarasovskaya N.E., Akhmetov K.I., Lunkov A.I. On the Problem of Using Natural Biologically Active Substances to Activate Artemia Eggs. «Дoклады НАН РК». 2020;5:5–12. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abysheva L.N., Belenovskaya L.M., Bobylyeva N.S. Dikorastushchie Poleznye Rasteniia Rossii [Wild Useful Plants of Russia] Publ. SPCPA; St. Petersburg, Russia: 2001. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu F., Zhan J., Chen J., He C., Zhang Q. Water yield variation due to forestry change in the head-water area of Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Adv. Meteorol. 2015;2015:786764. doi: 10.1155/2015/786764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abella S., Fisichelli N.A., Schmid S.M., Embrey T.M., Hughson D., Cipra J. Status and management of non-native plant invasion in three of the largest national parks in the United States. Nat. Conserv. 2015;10:71–94. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.10.4407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Khan M.S., Khan S.M., Ullah A., Liu J., Wu Z.-Y., Mohammad N., Batool Z., Afza R., Saqib Z., Manan F. Ecological assessment of Iris hookeriana across subalpine and alpine regions of the Hindu-Himalaya. Front. For. Glob. Change. 2025;8:1539025 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shah M., Khan S.M., Manan F., Hussain J., Din Z.U., Shah I., Arshad M., Ahmad I. The Role of Plant Nurseries in the Spread of Invasive Alien Plant Species in Pakistan’s Subtropical Region; A Threat for Urban Greening. Urban For. Urban Green. 2025;105:128688. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu H., Yuan Y., Xiong D., Zhang B., Liu L., Li W., Zhang X., Wang X., Deng W. Variation in soil erosion rate under typical land uses and vertical zones in an agricultural catchment of the Daliangshan region, Southwest China. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2024;49:3013–3026. doi: 10.1002/esp.5872. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yu J., Meixner F.X., Sun W., Mamtimin B., Xia C., Xie W. Biogenic nitric oxide emission of mountain soils sampled from different vertical landscape zones in the Changbai Mountains, Northeastern China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:4122–4128. doi: 10.1021/es100380m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kamran S., Khan S.M., Ahmad Z., Ur Rahman A., Iqbal M., Manan F., Ul Haq Z., Ullah S. The role of graveyards in species conservation and beta diversity: A vegetation appraisal of sacred habitats from Bannu, Pakistan. J. For. Res. 2020;31:1147–1158. doi: 10.1007/s11676-019-00893-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ul Haq Z., Shujaul Mulk Khan Abdullah, Razzaq A., Fazal Manan S.K., Rasheed S., Ahmad Z. Heavy metals uptake ability from water by the Himalayan alder growing in Riparian habitat of Sino Japanese regions in Pakistan. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020;9:704–713. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Patrício K.P., Minato A.C.d.S., Brolio A.F., Lopes M.A., Barros G.R.d., Moraes V., Barbosa G.C. Medicinal plant use in primary health care: An integrative review. Cienc. Saude Coletiva. 2022;27:677–686. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232022272.46312020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raga A., de Souza-Filho M.F., Machado R.A., Sato M.E., Siloto R.C. Host ranges and infestation indices of fruit flies (Tephritidae) and lance flies (Lonchaeidae) in São Paulo State, Brazil. Fla. Entomol. 2011;94:787–794. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kaur J., Pathak M., Pathak D. Development and characterization of F1 hybrids involving cultivated and related species of okra. Veg. Sci. 2023;50:73–77. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Appalasamy S., Zamri N.S.A., Arumugam N., Nor M.M., Zakaria S., Subramaniam S. Conservation of Indigenous Knowledge on the Consumption of Medicinal Zingiberaceae by Locals in Kelantan, Peninsular Malaysia. IOP Publishing; Bristol, UK: 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Handayani M., Sulistiyowati E. Local Knowledge on Useful Plants in The Coastal Line Along Parangtritis and Its Surroundings. UIN Sunan Kalijaga; Yogyakarta, Indonesia: 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Teixidor-Toneu I., Mattalia G., Caillon S., Abdullah A., Fiser Ž., Karlsen P., Khan S.M., Kool A., Loayza G., Porcuna-Ferrer A., et al. Stewardship underpins sustainable foraging. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2025;40:315–319. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2025.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu F.L., Mambo W.W., Liu J., Zhu G.F., Khan R., Khan S.M., Lu L. Spatiotemporal range dynamics and conservation optimization for endangered medicinal plants in the Himalaya. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2025;57:e03390. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ullah T., Khan S.M., Abdullah A., Sulaiman N., Ullah A., Khan M.S., Zeb S.A., Pieroni A. Bio-Cultural Diversity for Food Security: Traditional Wild Food Plants and Their Folk Cuisine in Lakki Marwat, Northwestern Pakistan. Diversity. 2024;16:684. doi: 10.3390/d16110684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Khan W., Khan S.M., Ahmad H. Altitudinal variation in plant species richness and diversity at Thandiani sub forests division, Abbottabad, Pakistan. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 2015;7:46–53. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mehmood A., Shah A.H., Shah A.H., Khan S.U., Khan K.R., Farooq M., Ahmad H., Sakhi S. Classification and ordination analysis of herbaceous flora in district Tor Ghar, western Himalaya. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021;41:451–462. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ozturk M., Khan S.M., Altay V., Efe R., Egamberdieva D., Khassanov F. Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainability in Asia: Volume II: Prospects and Challenges in South and Middle Asia. Springer Nature; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).




