Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1983 Jul;340:649–680. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014785

Calcium transients studied under voltage-clamp control in frog twitch muscle fibres

R Miledi 1, I Parker 1, P H Zhu 1
PMCID: PMC1199232  PMID: 6604154

Abstract

1. Intracellular calcium transients were recorded from frog twitch muscle fibres in response to voltage-clamped depolarizing pulses, using arsenazo III as an intracellular calcium monitor. The object was to investigate the time- and voltage-dependent characteristics of the coupling process between membrane depolarization and calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (s.r.)

2. To examine the extent to which the T-tubule membrane potential was controlled during clamp pulses, the dye NK 2367 was used as an optical probe of tubular potential. This indicated that the tubular time constant is about 0·6 msec.

3. Strength—duration curves were obtained for depolarizing pulses required to give both threshold mechanical contraction and calcium signal. Curves measured in these two ways were closely similar.

4. Changes in holding potential altered the strength—duration curve for calcium release so that at more positive holding potentials a shorter pulse was needed to obtain a response for any given pulse amplitude.

5. A latency of a few milliseconds was observed between the onset of depolarization and the initial rise of the calcium signal. This became shorter with stronger depolarizations, but approached a minimum at potentials above about +25 mV.

6. Subthreshold depolarizations applied before a test pulse increased the size and decreased the latency of the calcium signal. Conditioning hyperpolarizations had opposite effects.

7. The rate of build-up of potentiation or depression of response size seen with subthreshold de- and hyperpolarizing conditioning pulses was examined using conditioning pulses of different durations. For both pulses this process showed a time constant of about 3 msec (at 10 °C).

8. The rate of decay of potentiation or depression was similarly measured, using a gap of variable duration between conditioning and test pulses. For both de- and hyperpolarizing pulses this showed a time constant of about 5 msec (10 °C).

9. The relationship between conditioning pulse potential, and the size of calcium signal elicited by a following test pulse was non-linear.

10. Subthreshold pulses immediately following a brief test pulse affected the size of the calcium signal in a similar way to preceding conditioning pulses.

11. The relationship between potential and size of the calcium signal was examined using pulses of 3 and 20 msec duration. With the long pulse the relation was roughly sigmoid, but with the short pulse continued to rise even at strongly positive potentials.

12. The results are discussed in terms of a model in which the exponential build-up of a hypothetical coupler in the excitation—contraction (e.—c.) coupling process is presumed to lead to calcium release when a threshold level is exceeded.

Full text

PDF
649

Images in this article

651Fig. 1
on p.651

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):207–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Voltage clamp experiments in striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):607–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H. Charge movement in the membrane of striated muscle. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:85–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian R. H., Costantin L. L., Peachey L. D. Radial spread of contraction in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):231–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adrian R. H., Peres A. Charge movement and membrane capacity in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1979 Apr;289:83–97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almers W., Best P. M. Effects of tetracaine on displacement currents and contraction of frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):583–611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blinks J. R., Rüdel R., Taylor S. R. Calcium transients in isolated amphibian skeletal muscle fibres: detection with aequorin. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:291–323. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caputo C. Excitation and contraction processes in muscle. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:63–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.000431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F., Schneider M. F. A non-linear voltage dependent charge movement in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):245–283. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F., Schneider M. F. Effects of glycerol treatment and maintained depolarization on charge movement in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):285–316. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Costantin L. L. Contractile activation in skeletal muscle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1975;29(2):197–224. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(76)90023-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Endo M. Calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Physiol Rev. 1977 Jan;57(1):71–108. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1977.57.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FALK G., FATT P. LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Apr 14;160:69–123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ford L. E., Podolsky R. J. Intracellular calcium movements in skinned muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):21–33. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heiny J. A., Vergara J. Optical signals from surface and T system membranes in skeletal muscle fibers. Experiments with the potentiometric dye NK2367. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Aug;80(2):203–230. doi: 10.1085/jgp.80.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Horowicz P., Schneider M. F. Membrane charge moved at contraction thresholds in skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:595–633. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Horowicz P., Schneider M. F. Membrane charge movement in contracting and non-contracting skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:565–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hui C. S. Pharmacological dissection of charge movement in frog skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1982 Jul;39(1):119–122. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84498-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kovács L., Ríos E., Schneider M. F. Calcium transients and intramembrane charge movement in skeletal muscle fibres. Nature. 1979 May 31;279(5712):391–396. doi: 10.1038/279391a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kovács L., Schneider M. F. Contractile activation by voltage clamp depolarization of cut skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:483–506. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lüttgau H. C., Spiecker W. The effects of calcium deprivation upon mechanical and electrophysiological parameters in skeletal muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1979 Nov;296:411–429. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mathias R. T., Levis R. A., Eisenberg R. S. Electrical models of excitation-contraction coupling and charge movement in skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Jul;76(1):1–31. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miledi R., Nakajima S., Parker I., Takahashi T. Effects of membrane polarization on sarcoplasmic calcium release in skeletal muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Sep 17;213(1190):1–13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miledi R., Parker I., Schalow G. Calcium transients in frog slow muscle fibres. Nature. 1977 Aug 25;268(5622):750–752. doi: 10.1038/268750a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miledi R., Parker I., Schalow G. Measurement of calcium transients in frog muscle by the use of arsenazo III. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Aug 22;198(1131):201–210. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miledi R., Parker I., Schalow G. Transition temperature of excitation-contraction coupling in frog twitch muscle fibres. Nature. 1979 Jul 26;280(5720):326–328. doi: 10.1038/280326a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miledi R., Parker I., Schalow G. Transmitter induced calcium entry across the post-synaptic membrane at frog end-plates measured using arsenazo III. J Physiol. 1980 Mar;300:197–212. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miledi R., Parker I., Zhu P. H. Calcium transients evoked by action potentials in frog twitch muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1982 Dec;333:655–679. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Miledi R., Parker I., Zhu P. H. Calcium transients in frog skeletal muscle fibres following conditioning stimuli. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:223–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakajima S., Gilai A. Action potentials of isolated single muscle fibers recorded by potential-sensitive dyes. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Dec;76(6):729–750. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.6.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakajima S., Gilai A. Radial propagation of muscle action potential along the tubular system examined by potential-sensitive dyes. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Dec;76(6):751–762. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.6.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Palade P., Vergara J. Arsenazo III and antipyrylazo III calcium transients in single skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Apr;79(4):679–707. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.4.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ross W. N., Salzberg B. M., Cohen L. B., Davila H. V. A large change in dye absorption during the action potential. Biophys J. 1974 Dec;14(12):983–986. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85963-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1973 Mar 23;242(5395):244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schneider M. F. Membrane charge movement and depolarization-contraction coupling. Annu Rev Physiol. 1981;43:507–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.43.030181.002451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stephenson E. W. Activation of fast skeletal muscle: contributions of studies on skinned fibers. Am J Physiol. 1981 Jan;240(1):C1–19. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1981.240.1.C1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES