Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1984 Feb;347:255–277. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015065

Substance P reduces acetylcholine-induced currents in isolated bovine chromaffin cells.

D E Clapham, E Neher
PMCID: PMC1199446  PMID: 6200595

Abstract

Patch-clamp techniques were used to examine the effect of substance P on acetylcholine-induced current in bovine chromaffin cells. Cells had been enzymatically isolated and kept in short-term culture. Experiments were performed at 22 degrees C. Under whole-cell voltage-clamp conditions substance P alone (2-10 microM) did not induce ionic currents. Acetylcholine (ACh, 20 microM) at -60 mV induced an inward current that desensitized in the continued presence of ACh. The time course of desensitization was somewhat variable from cell to cell. In most cases it could be fitted by a single exponential with time constant of 8-10 s. Substance P (2-50 microM) applied simultaneously with ACh induced what appeared to be an acceleration of the desensitization process. The time course in the presence of 10 microM-substance P (20 microM-ACh) was best fitted by the sum of two exponentials with time constants of 0.6 s and 5 s respectively. The effect was reversible. The recovery of ACh-induced current from desensitization was not affected by substance P. The time constant for recovery was approximately 7 s in the presence or absence of substance P. Single-channel records showed that the conductance of individual channels was not changed by substance P. The mean open time of single channels was shortened by substance P both at high (20 microM) and at low (0.5 microM) concentrations of ACh. The inverse mean open time varied linearly with substance P concentration. Single-channel responses appeared in bursts and clusters after almost complete desensitization at 20 microM-ACh, as was previously observed in frog skeletal muscle. Substance P dramatically reduced ACh current by increasing interburst intervals while decreasing burst duration and the number of openings per burst. We conclude that substance P inhibits ACh-induced depolarization of chromaffin cells either by increasing the rate of desensitization or by inducing channel blockade, which indirectly enhances desensitization. Possible models of desensitization in the absence and presence of substance P are discussed.

Full text

PDF
255

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Membr Biol. 1981 Feb 28;58(3):161–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01870902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Drug blockade of open end-plate channels. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(3):531–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker J. L. Peptides: roles in neuronal excitability. Physiol Rev. 1976 Apr;56(2):435–452. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1976.56.2.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belcher G., Ryall R. W. Substance P and Renshaw cells: a new concept of inhibitory synaptic interactions. J Physiol. 1977 Oct;272(1):105–119. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ben-Haim D., Dreyer F., Peper K. Acetylcholine receptor: modification of synaptic gating mechanism after treatment with a disulfide bond reducing agent. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Mar 22;355(1):19–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00584796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biales B., Dichter M., Tischler A. Electrical excitability of cultured adrenal chromaffin cells. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):743–753. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandt B. L., Hagiwara S., Kidokoro Y., Miyazaki S. Action potentials in the rat chromaffin cell and effects of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(3):417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):464–466. doi: 10.1038/294464a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies J., Dray A. Substance P and opiate receptors. Nature. 1977 Jul 28;268(5618):351–352. doi: 10.1038/268351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Douglas W. W., Kanno T., Sampson S. R. Effects of acetylcholine and other medullary secretagogues and antagonists on the membrane potential of adrenal chromaffin cells: an analysis employing techniques of tissue culture. J Physiol. 1967 Jan;188(1):107–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feltz A., Trautmann A. Desensitization at the frog neuromuscular junction: a biphasic process. J Physiol. 1982 Jan;322:257–272. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fenwick E. M., Marty A., Neher E. A patch-clamp study of bovine chromaffin cells and of their sensitivity to acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1982 Oct;331:577–597. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fenwick E. M., Marty A., Neher E. Sodium and calcium channels in bovine chromaffin cells. J Physiol. 1982 Oct;331:599–635. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heidmann T., Changeux J. P. Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of a fluorescent agonist with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Feb 15;94(1):255–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb12893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huganir R. L., Greengard P. cAMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylates the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1130–1134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hökfelt T., Elfvin L. G., Schultzberg M., Goldstein M., Nilsson G. On the occurrence of substance P-containing fibers in sympathetic ganglia: immunohistochemical evidence. Brain Res. 1977 Aug 19;132(1):29–41. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90704-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackson M. B., Wong B. S., Morris C. E., Lecar H., Christian C. N. Successive openings of the same acetylcholine receptor channel are correlated in open time. Biophys J. 1983 Apr;42(1):109–114. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84375-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kidokoro Y., Ritchie A. K. Chromaffin cell action potentials and their possible role in adrenaline secretion from rat adrenal medulla. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:199–216. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krishtal O. A., Pidoplichko V. I. A receptor for protons in the nerve cell membrane. Neuroscience. 1980;5(12):2325–2327. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Livett B. G., Kozousek V., Mizobe F., Dean D. M. Substance P inhibits nicotinic activation of chromaffin cells. Nature. 1979 Mar 15;278(5701):256–257. doi: 10.1038/278256a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Magleby K. L., Pallotta B. S. A study of desensitization of acetylcholine receptors using nerve-released transmitter in the frog. J Physiol. 1981 Jul;316:225–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mizobe F., Kozousek V., Dean D. M., Livett B. G. Pharmacological characterization of adrenal paraneurons: substance P and somatostatin as inhibitory modulators of the nicotinic response. Brain Res. 1979 Dec 14;178(2-3):555–566. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90714-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mohd N. A., Hawthorne J. N. Phosphatidylinositol labelling in response to activation of muscarinic receptors in bovine adrenal medulla. J Neurochem. 1981 May;36(5):1858–1860. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb00441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Neher E., Steinbach J. H. Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:153–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neher E. The charge carried by single-channel currents of rat cultured muscle cells in the presence of local anaesthetics. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:663–678. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Neubig R. R., Boyd N. D., Cohen J. B. Conformations of Torpedo acetylcholine receptor associated with ion transport and desensitization. Biochemistry. 1982 Jul 6;21(14):3460–3467. doi: 10.1021/bi00257a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Neubig R. R., Cohen J. B. Permeability control by cholinergic receptors in Torpedo postsynaptic membranes: agonist dose-response relations measured at second and millisecond times. Biochemistry. 1980 Jun 10;19(12):2770–2779. doi: 10.1021/bi00553a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Otsuka M., Konishi S. Release of substance P-like immunoreactivity from isolated spinal cord of newborn rat. Nature. 1976 Nov 4;264(5581):83–84. doi: 10.1038/264083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peper K., Bradley R. J., Dreyer F. The acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction. Physiol Rev. 1982 Oct;62(4 Pt 1):1271–1340. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1982.62.4.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Role L. W., Leeman S. E., Perlman R. L. Somatostatin and substance P inhibit catecholamine secretion from isolated cells of guinea-pig adrenal medulla. Neuroscience. 1981;6(9):1813–1821. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90215-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sakmann B., Patlak J., Neher E. Single acetylcholine-activated channels show burst-kinetics in presence of desensitizing concentrations of agonist. Nature. 1980 Jul 3;286(5768):71–73. doi: 10.1038/286071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smilowitz H., Hadjian R. A., Dwyer J., Feinstein M. B. Regulation of acetylcholine receptor phosphorylation by calcium and calmodulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):4708–4712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.4708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stallcup W. B., Patrick J. Substance P enhances cholinergic receptor desensitization in a clonal nerve cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):634–638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Steinacker A., Highstein S. M. Pre- and postsynaptic action of substance P at the Mauther fiber-giant fiber synapse in the hatchetfish. Brain Res. 1976 Sep 10;114(1):128–133. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)91013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Terrar D. A. Effects of dithiothreitol on end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:403–417. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tregear G. W., Niall H. D., Potts J. T., Jr, Leeman S. E., Chang M. M. Synthesis of substance P. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 21;232(29):87–89. doi: 10.1038/newbio232087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. V Euler U. S., Gaddum J. H. An unidentified depressor substance in certain tissue extracts. J Physiol. 1931 Jun 6;72(1):74–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1931.sp002763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Walker J. W., McNamee M. G., Pasquale E., Cash D. J., Hess G. P. Acetylcholine receptor inactivation in Torpedo californica electroplax membrane vesicles. Detection of two processes in the millisecond and second time regions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981 May 15;100(1):86–90. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(81)80066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES