Abstract
Three classes of wild house mice, Mus musculus, were studied: (a) mice of the tenth generation in captivity in an environment kept at 23 degrees C (controls); (b) a similar stock kept at 3 degrees C (Eskimo); (c) offspring of controls transferred at mating to 3 degrees C (immigrants). For analysis of chemical composition, samples of milk were drawn from lactating females after they had been injected with oxytocin. For estimates of milk yield, lactating females were injected with tritiated water, and yield was calculated from the tritium content of young aged 10 days, over a 24 h period. The milk of Eskimo females had a much higher proportion of both fat and protein than had milk of other classes. The milk of immigrant females had more fat but less protein than that of controls. Eskimo females were heavier than immigrant females; control females were the lightest. Eskimo young at 10 days were heavier than those of the other classes. Their body fat was much higher; but their fat-free body weight was also above that of the others. Young of both classes in the cold drank more milk than the controls, and the Eskimo more than the immigrant young. Maternal body weight, milk intake by the young and body weight of the young were intercorrelated, but milk intake was the principal determinant of the body weight of the young. There was no evidence of differences in the growth potential of the young of different classes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BLIGH E. G., DYER W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959 Aug;37(8):911–917. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett S. A., Little M. J. Maternal performance in mice at -3 degrees C: food consumption and fertility. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Jul 27;162(989):492–501. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett S. A. Maternal processes in the cold-adaptation of mice. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1973 Nov;48(4):477–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1973.tb01567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett S. A., Widdowson E. M. Organ weights and body composition of parturient and lactating mice, and their young, at 21 degrees C and -3 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil. 1971 Jul;26(1):39–57. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0260039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baverstock P. R., Spencer L., Pollard C. Water balance of small lactating rodents--II. Concentration and composition of milk of females on ad libitum and restricted water intakes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1976 Jan;53(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9629(76)80008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feller W. F., Boretos J. Semiautomatic apparatus for milking mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1967 Jan;38(1):11–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jara-Almonte M., White J. M. Milk production in laboratory mice. J Dairy Sci. 1972 Oct;55(10):1502–1505. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85703-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knight C. H., Peaker M. Mammary development in mice: effects of hemihysterectomy in pregnancy and of litter size post partum. J Physiol. 1982 Jun;327:17–27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagai J., Sarkar N. K. Relationship between milk yield and mammary gland development in mice. J Dairy Sci. 1978 Jun;61(6):733–739. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(78)83641-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rath E. A., Thenen S. W. Use of tritiated water for measurement of 24-hour milk intake in suckling lean and genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. J Nutr. 1979 May;109(5):840–847. doi: 10.1093/jn/109.5.840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanier M. W., Mount L. E. Growth rate, food intake and body composition before and after weaning in strains of mice selected for mature body-weight. Br J Nutr. 1972 Nov;28(3):307–325. doi: 10.1079/bjn19720041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]